The MraY Inhibitor Muraymycin D2 and Its Derivatives Induce Enlarged Cells in Obligate Intracellular Chlamydia and Wolbachia and Break the Persistence Phenotype in Chlamydia

Chlamydial infections and diseases caused by filarial nematodes are global health concerns. However, treatment presents challenges due to treatment failures potentially caused by persisting Chlamydia and long regimens against filarial infections accompanied by low compliance. A new treatment strategy could be the targeting of the reduced peptidoglycan structures involved in cell division in the obligate intracellular bacteria Chlamydia and Wolbachia, the latter being obligate endosymbionts supporting filarial development, growth, and survival. Here, cell culture experiments with C. trachomatis and Wolbachia showed that the nucleoside antibiotics muraymycin and carbacaprazamycin interfere with bacterial cell division and induce enlarged, aberrant cells resembling the penicillin-induced persistence phenotype in Chlamydia. Enzymatic inhibition experiments with purified C. pneumoniae MraY revealed that muraymycin derivatives abolish the synthesis of the peptidoglycan precursor lipid I. Comparative in silico analyses of chlamydial and wolbachial MraY with the corresponding well-characterized enzyme in Aquifex aeolicus revealed a high degree of conservation, providing evidence for a similar mode of inhibition. Muraymycin D2 treatment eradicated persisting non-dividing C. trachomatis cells from an established penicillin-induced persistent infection. This finding indicates that nucleoside antibiotics may have additional properties that can break bacterial persistence.


Introduction
Bacteria of the genera Chlamydia and Wolbachia are obligate intracellular bacteria of medical importance.Chlamydia spp.are pathogens that undergo a unique biphasic developmental cycle within human epithelial and endothelial cells, whereas Wolbachia spp.reside in filarial nematodes and can cause diseases in humans.
Chlamydia infect host cells as condensed and metabolically less active elementary bodies (EBs).After invagination into the host cell, the EBs differentiate into non-infectious, metabolically active reticulate bodies (RBs) and replicate in the chlamydial inclusion.They asynchronously differentiate back into EBs and are released by host cell lysis or extrusion.One of the most relevant chlamydial pathogens is C. trachomatis.Serovars A-C cause ocular infections that are the leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide [1], while serovars D-K lead to ano-urogenital infections, and serovars L1-L3 cause lymphogranuloma venereum.The latter two are sexually transmitted infections.In 2019, 434,184 confirmed cases of genital chlamydial infection were recorded in member states of the European Union/European Economic Area [2].Infections such as cervicitis in women and urethritis in men are often asymptomatic, but chronic or untreated chlamydial infections can have detrimental consequences for women, e.g., pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage [3,4].Currently, the WHO recommends doxycycline (DOX) or azithromycin (AZI) treatment for uncomplicated genital Chlamydia infections [5].However, high rates of reoccurring chlamydial infections after treatment have been reported, ranging from a median of 13% in a meta-study to 31% for females in the USA [6][7][8].About 8% of treatment failures cannot be attributed to reinfection by sexual partners [8,9].
Besides the possibility of reinfection from the gastro-intestinal tract [10], persistent C. trachomatis infection should be taken into consideration, as enlarged chlamydial cells could be observed in murine tissue under amoxicillin treatment [11] and in tissue from patients [6,12].These enlarged and non-dividing cells, referred to as aberrant bodies (ABs), can be found in cell culture in the presence of stressors such as β-lactams and interferonγ [13,14].ABs are less metabolically active, persist within the host cell, and can re-enter the developmental cycle after the removal of the stressor [14,15].Persisting chlamydial cells, including those induced by penicillin (PEN) treatment, are less susceptible to DOX and AZI in cell culture and in murine infection models [11,[16][17][18], a phenomenon that may also contribute to treatment failure with these front-line antibiotics in patients.
Wolbachia spp.can be found in a range of arthropods and filarial nematodes [19][20][21].In arthropods, these endobacteria are mostly facultative symbionts [22], whereas in the filarial nematodes Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, Brugia timori, and Onchocerca volvulus, they are obligate endosymbionts that support filarial development and survival [23,24].Filarial infections cause the neglected tropical diseases lymphatic filariasis, transmitted by mosquitos, and onchocerciasis (river blindness), transmitted by blackflies.Worldwide, an estimated 52 million people had lymphatic filariasis in 2018, and the disease predominantly occurs in the tropical countries of Africa and Asia [25].Onchocerciasis, predominantly found in Africa and in foci in Yemen and Latin America, affects 21 million people, causing severe skin disease and vision loss [26].The drugs diethylcarbamazine or ivermectin used to treat lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis mainly kill the larvae in the blood or skin but not the adult worms [26].Because the nematodes are dependent on Wolbachia spp.for development and adult worm survival, DOX or rifampicin, which both deplete the endobacteria from the worms, can also be used, with the benefit that the targeting of Wolbachia spp.leads to the killing of adult worms and, therefore, does not require annual or biannual treatment for the lifetime of the adult worms as it is required for diethylcarbamazine and ivermectin [23,24,27].Anti-wolbachial treatment is the only safe and effective adult worm-killing therapy [28], and new drugs without the contraindications for DOX and rifampicin are needed.
Treatment failure of chlamydial infections, the high prevalence of C. trachomatis and diseases caused by filarial nematodes, and long treatment regimens in combination with low compliance and contraindications for filarial infections stress the need for new antimicrobial treatment strategies against Chlamydia and Wolbachia.An important antibiotic target in many bacteria is the peptidoglycan (PGN) layer within the cell envelope.PGN is unique to bacteria and usually consists of linear glycan strands connected by cross-linked peptides that form an exoskeleton-like meshwork that protects bacteria from osmotic stress.Inside their intracellular niche, Chlamydia and Wolbachia are protected from osmotic challenges, and the reductive adaptation to their host is reflected by the loss of a canonical energy-costintensive PGN-based cell wall [29][30][31].
However, both endobacteria retained reduced, but functional, PGN biosynthesis pathways that have been implicated in cell division [32][33][34].Chlamydia synthesize a transient PGN ring that is required for a unique cell division process [29,30,35,36].The exact PGN structure in Wolbachia is unknown, but a growing body of research provides evidence for a reduced PGN-like structure that is also important for cell division [31][32][33].
Antibiotics targeting PGN biosynthesis in the obligate intracellular Chlamydia and Wolbachia need to traverse several membranes, and due to the reduced synthesis machinery and distinct functions and structure of PGN in both endobacteria, these antibiotics may not act in the same manner as it has been defined in free-living bacteria.PEN binds to penicillinbinding proteins (PBPs) and thereby interferes with the transpeptidation and remodeling of PGN, which is usually bactericidal in many bacteria via not fully understood cellular downstream effects.PEN acts bacteriostatically in Chlamydia and induces a reversible state of persistence by blocking cell division, which leads to the formation of enlarged ABs that persist within the host cell [14,[37][38][39].Wolbachia, on the other hand, are unaffected by PEN treatment [40] but are susceptible to fosfomycin [32], which lacks activity against Chlamydia due to intrinsic resistance [41].Fosfomycin targets the first synthesis step of the PGN precursor lipid II [42].We previously showed that fosfomycin treatment also induces the formation of enlarged Wolbachia cells [33], a phenotype similar to that seen for PEN treatment of Chlamydia.
A target of interest within the lipid II synthesis pathway is the transferase MraY, a member of the polyprenyl-phosphate N-acetyl hexosamine 1-phosphate transferase superfamily.Our previous work showed that both Chlamydia and Wolbachia harbor functionally conserved MraY and MurG homologs and are thus capable of synthesizing the PGN precursor lipid II [32].At the inner membrane of these two organisms, the soluble precursor uridine diphosphate (UDP)-N-acetylmuramoyl(MurNAc)-pentapeptide is first linked to the membrane carrier undecaprenyl-phosphate (bactoprenol, C 55 -P) by the integral membrane protein MraY, yielding the penultimate PGN precursor, lipid I. Subsequently, the glycosylation of lipid I with UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) by MurG leads to the formation of lipid II [32].
In this study, we aimed to understand the PGN synthesis machinery in Chlamydia and Wolbachia and to explore the antimicrobial activity of muraymycins against these distinct non-model bacteria that have both functionally conserved the target of nucleoside antibiotics.Using cell culture-based infection models, we showed that these endobacteria are susceptible to muraymycins.In both genera, the MraY inhibitors induced the formation of enlarged cells that are similar to the chlamydial PEN-induced persistence phenotype.In complementary enzymatic studies with purified chlamydial MraY, we verified the integral membrane protein as a target of muraymycin D2 in Chlamydia.Based on our in silico analysis, we propose a similar mechanism for the binding of MRY D2 and its derivatives to the target protein MraY in Chlamydia and Wolbachia as that described for A. aeolicus MraY.When applied to PEN-induced persistent chlamydial infection, MRY D2 had persistencebreaking properties and eradicated the enlarged non-dividing chlamydiae from the host cells, indicating that the nucleoside antibiotics may have further effects in addition to the inhibition of MraY.

Muraymycin D2 and its Derivatives Induce the Formation of Enlarged Cells in C. trachomatis upon Treatment at an Early Stage of the Chlamydial Developmental Cycle
Treatment failure of genital chlamydial infections is not completely understood and needs to be addressed by understanding the underlying reasons and by searching for new antibiotics against the minimalist bacteria.Here, we explored the effects of muraymycins in obligate intracellular Chlamydia.These natural compounds block PGN synthesis through interference with the transferase MraY in free-living bacteria [45,[47][48][49][50]. Since the enzyme is functionally conserved in Chlamydia [32], we postulated that muraymycins may have antichlamydial activity and hamper biosynthesis of the PGN ring that is essential in chlamydial cell division, as shown for the persistence-inducing antibiotic PEN.
First, we tested the lead compound MRY D2 (Figure 1a) and seven muraymycin derivatives (MRH; described in [47,48]) on C. trachomatis in cell culture experiments.To this end, C. trachomatis D/UW-3/CX-infected HEp-2 cells were treated with the compounds at 2 h post infection (hpi; Figure 1b), which represents an early stage of the chlamydial developmental cycle before bacterial replication [14,51].Inhibitors were applied over a range of concentrations that were not detrimental to HEp-2 host cells in resazurin-based viability assays (Table S1), and the effects were visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Figures 1c and S2) at 30 hpi.The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Chlamydia was defined as either the lowest concentration leading to a >90% reduction in inclusions [52] or, for aberrance-inducing compounds, the concentration leading to abnormal chlamydial cell phenotypes, i.e., enlarged cells after treatment with PEN G [39].
As expected, our data showed that the PEN G control acted bacteriostatically, resulting in the presence of enlarged, non-dividing bacterial cells in the inclusion, whereas the ciprofloxacin control killed the pathogens and cleared the infection from the host cells (Figure 1c).The lead compound, MRY D2 (Figure 1a), induced the formation of large ABs at 128 µg/mL (Figure 1c), phenocopying the PEN-induced persistence phenotype (Figure 1c).This observation supports our hypothesis that MRY D2 targets chlamydial MraY and thereby affects the cell division machinery in the cell-wall-lacking minimalist endobacterium.
Compared with MRY D2, all muraymycin derivatives had a lipophilic C 15 side chain (Figures 1d and S1) added to their peptidic moiety.Each derivative had further modifications in the peptidic moiety, and some were configuration isomers (MRH-22/23; MRH-38/-76; Figures 1d and S1).Except for MRH-92, treatment with all other muraymycin derivatives led to an enlarged chlamydial cell phenotype (Figure S2).However, the phenotype was induced at lower concentrations compared with the lead compound: MRH-22, -38, and -82 had an MIC of 64 µg/mL, while MRH-23, -25, and -76 had an MIC of 32 µg/mL (Figure 1d).Since these derivatives induced the phenotype at lower concentrations, the addition of the lipophilic side chain seemed to enhance the anti-chlamydial activity.Furthermore, the anti-chlamydial activity was increased two-fold for the derivatives MRH-23 and -76, which had an Sinstead of an R-configuration in the bond linking the acylated L-leucine to the peptidic moiety.
The derivative MRH-92 did not induce the formation of aberrant chlamydial cells even at the highest tested concentration of 64 µg/mL (Figure S2).The phenotype of the inclusions resembled that of the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle control (Figure 1c).We could not explore whether higher concentrations of MRH-92 might have led to the abnormal phenotype observed for the other muraymycins due to host cell cytotoxic effects at concentrations > 64 µg/mL (Table S1).The vehicle control with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) showed an active infection, 100 U/mL penicillin (PEN) G induced persistence visible as enlarged, aberrant bodies (ABs), while 0.5 µg/mL ciprofloxacin (CIP) was bactericidal.MRY D2 is shown at the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC; 128 µg/mL), at which the formation of aberrant cells was induced; cCPZ had the lowest MIC of 16 µg/mL.Eukaryotic host cell cytoplasm from representative images was labeled with Evans Blue (red), genomic desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) with 4 ′ ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue), and chlamydial lipopolysaccharide with fluorescein (green).Representative images of three experiments.Scale bar: 10 µm.(d) Overview of the structural features of muraymycin derivatives (MRH) and cCPZ compared with MRY D2.MRH-22 and -23 have an L-ornithine (L-Orn).Compared with MRY D2, the MICs of muraymycin and caprazamycin derivatives were lower, ranging between 16 µg/mL and 64 µg/mL.Data obtained from three experiments.MRH-92 did not induce the formation of enlarged chlamydial cells.
In addition, we analyzed the effect of another nucleoside antibiotic on C. trachomatis, the caprazamycin-derivative carbacaprazamycin (cCPZ; described in [49]) (Figure S1).Like most of the tested muraymycins, cCPZ induced the formation of enlarged, aberrant chlamydial cells with an MIC of 16 µg/mL, the lowest MIC measured in this study (Figure 1c,d).
Taken together, the majority of muraymycins and cCPZ induced the formation of enlarged C. trachomatis cells.In free-living bacteria, these antibiotics inhibit MraY and arrest cell wall biosynthesis [45,[47][48][49][50]. Based on our cell culture data obtained with C. trachomatis, we propose that the natural compounds also block cell division in this cell-wall-lacking non-model bacterium through interference with transferase MraY.

Muraymycins Induce the Formation of Enlarged Cells in Wolbachia
Chlamydia and Wolbachia are both intracellular bacteria with reduced genomes and modified PGN synthesis and cell division machineries.We showed that muraymycins induce the formation of enlarged cells in C. trachomatis; thus, we wanted to analyze if there are similar effects on the endosymbiont Wolbachia of Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells.First, we assessed the cytotoxicity of the compounds toward the insect cells by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect the insect actin B gene.Infected A. albopictus insect cells were cultured with varying concentrations of the derivatives or with the protein biosynthesis inhibitor DOX as a positive control for nine days.Most of the compounds were detrimental to the host cells; however, MRH-76 and -92 were non-toxic at the tested concentration range.
Therefore, we analyzed the activity of these two muraymycins using fluorescence microscopy and by measuring bacterial depletion by qPCR to detect the 16S rDNA gene from Wolbachia, normalized to the actin B gene from A. albopictus.As Wolbachia grow more slowly than Chlamydia, a longer treatment time was needed to see potential effects of the inhibitors [53].Our microscopy data showed that in untreated and DMSO-treated insect cells, Wolbachia were distributed throughout the host cell cytoplasm, seen as small green fluorescent foci (Figure 2a).Whilst treatment with 4 µg/mL DOX led to a depletion of the bacteria from the host cells (Figure 2c), treatment with 8 µg/mL MRH-76 led to the formation of enlarged wolbachial cells (Figure 2a; exemplary cells indicated by white squares), similar to the fosfomycin-induced Wolbachia phenotype [33].Interestingly, enlarged Wolbachia also appeared upon treatment with 32 µg/mL MRH-92 (Figure 2a), which had no effect on C. trachomatis (Figure 1c).
As the treatment of Wolbachia with muraymycin derivatives had similar effects to fosfomycin, which targets the first enzyme of UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide synthesis, our results support MraY as the target of muraymycins in Wolbachia.

Muraymycin D2 and the Derivative MRH-92 Inhibit the Chlamydial Transferase MraY In Vitro
As shown above, muraymycins induced the formation of enlarged cells in both intracellular species C. trachomatis and Wolbachia.Therefore, we hypothesized that MRY D2 and the tested derivatives target the transferase MraY (Figure 3a) in Wolbachia and Chlamydia as in free-living bacteria [45,[47][48][49][50]54].We previously showed that recombinant purified MraY of C. pneumoniae and Wolbachia endosymbiont from B. malayi exhibit activity in vitro, leading to the formation of lipid I using bactoprenol and UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide [32].Inhibition of MraY by compounds such as MRY D2 would lead to a depletion of lipid I and thereby block the synthesis of new PGN material.As a result, cell division would be arrested, similar to that seen following treatment with other antibiotics such as PEN G and fosfomycin in Chlamydia and Wolbachia, respectively [14,33].To further support the hypothesis that inhibition of MraY by MRY D2 and its derivatives caused the formation of enlarged cells, we performed MraY enzyme inhibition assays.

In Silico Analysis Reveals That Chlamydia and Wolbachia MraY Retain All Amino Acid Residues Important for Binding of UDP-MurNAc-Pentapeptide and Muraymycins
To further support the hypothesis that MraY of Chlamydia and Wolbachia is inhibited by muraymycins, we performed in silico studies.These included protein sequence alignments and 3D-protein model predictions with phyre2 created for MraY of C. trachomatis (Ctr), C. pneumoniae (Cpn), and Wolbachia endosymbionts of A. albopictus (wAlbB) and B. malayi (wBm) against crystal structures of A. aeolicus (Aae) MraY.The MraYAae active C. pneumoniae MraY was heterologously overexpressed in E. coli, purified via Histag affinity chromatography, and inhibition of the enzymatic activity was analyzed by visualizing the reaction products via thin-layer chromatography.We conducted MraY Cpn inhibition assays by incubation with either MRY D2 or MRH-92 at concentrations between 0.05 µM and 0.5 µM, as the compounds did not need to traverse four membranes as in the cell culture-based experiments, and lower concentrations could be used.Both compounds completely abolished enzymatic activity at 0.5 µM (Figure 3b), indicating that MraY Cpn is the target of MRY D2 and MRH-92.

In Silico Analysis Reveals That Chlamydia and Wolbachia MraY Retain All Amino Acid Residues Important for Binding of UDP-MurNAc-Pentapeptide and Muraymycins
To further support the hypothesis that MraY of Chlamydia and Wolbachia is inhibited by muraymycins, we performed in silico studies.These included protein sequence alignments and 3D-protein model predictions with phyre2 created for MraY of C. trachomatis (Ctr), C. pneumoniae (Cpn), and Wolbachia endosymbionts of A. albopictus (wAlbB) and B. malayi (wBm) against crystal structures of A. aeolicus (Aae) MraY.The MraY Aae active site has been well studied [55][56][57][58] in the apo form where the cofactor Mn 2+ was exchanged for Mg 2+ [58], as well as in complex with MRY D2 [50].Additionally, crystallization with cCPZ led to further characterization of residues contributing to the binding of the lipophilic side chain [54].
Crystal structures of MraY Aae bound to MRY D2 showed that MRY D2 did not interact with the three catalytic aspartic acid residues of the active site but, rather, formed a watermediated hydrogen-bonding network with H324 and H325, occupying the binding site for UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide [50].Upon MRY D2 binding, a conformational change of MraY Aae took place, where the active site was reshaped forming a nucleoside-binding and a peptide-binding pocket, which still faced the cytoplasm (Figure 4) [50,58].The lipophilic side chain of cCPZ was bound in a hydrophilic cleft (Figure 4) [54,58].Thus, the mode of inhibition of MraY Aae by MRY D2 and acylated derivatives was competitive for the natural substrate UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide regarding the nucleotide-binding site but non-competitive for C 55 -P [47,50,54].
As in MraY Aae , our predictions for MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm identified that the residues contributing to the binding of MRY D2 and the lipophilic side chain are located on the outside of the proteins and face the cytoplasm and hydrophobic cleft, respectively (Figure 4).Furthermore, MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm seem to change their conformation as the active sites are wider in our respective predictions, leading to the formation of uracil and peptidic side-chain binding pockets by moving the residues for binding closer together (Figure 4), as shown for MraY Aae [50].or MraYAae crystallized with MRY D2 [50] with 100% confidence.Proteins are viewed from the side (top: periplasm; bottom: cytoplasm) or turned by 90° + 90° and viewed from the cytoplasm.Amino acid residues of the active site (orange), Mn 2+ ions (representative for Mg 2+ ; grey), Ni 2+ ions (magenta), as well as residues contributing to binding of uracil (red), 5′-aminoribose (green), and the peptidic side chain (violet) from MRY D2 and the acyl moiety of cCPZ (blue), are highlighted as in [50,58].Surface hydrophobicity is indicated from hydrophobic (brown) to hydrophilic (turquoise).The hydrophobic groove (dashed line) of apoMraYAae is visualized as in [58].The phyre2 predictions revealed that MraYCtr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm have similar secondary and tertiary structures compared to ap-oMraYAae.The active sites face the cytoplasm.In MraYCtr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm, the uracil, 5′-aminoribose, and peptidic side chains face the cytoplasm, residues contributing to the binding of the cCPZ acyl chain are located at the surface of the protein groove as in apoMraYAae.Residues V266 and I267 of MraY-wAlbB, contributing to acyl moiety binding in MraYAae, could not be predicted.).MraY structure predictions were made by pyhre2 against apoMrY Aae chain A [58] or MraY Aae crystallized with MRY D2 [50] with 100% confidence.Proteins are viewed from the side (top: periplasm; bottom: cytoplasm) or turned by 90 • + 90 • and viewed from the cytoplasm.Amino acid residues of the active site (orange), Mn 2+ ions (representative for Mg 2+ ; grey), Ni 2+ ions (magenta), as well as residues contributing to binding of uracil (red), 5 ′ -aminoribose (green), and the peptidic side chain (violet) from MRY D2 and the acyl moiety of cCPZ (blue), are highlighted as in [50,58].Surface hydrophobicity is indicated from hydrophobic (brown) to hydrophilic (turquoise).The hydrophobic groove (dashed line) of apoMraY Aae is visualized as in [58].The phyre2 predictions revealed that MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm have similar secondary and tertiary structures compared to apoMraY Aae .The active sites face the cytoplasm.In MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm , the uracil, 5 ′ -aminoribose, and peptidic side chains face the cytoplasm, residues contributing to the binding of the cCPZ acyl chain are located at the surface of the protein groove as in apoMraY Aae .Residues V266 and I267 of MraY wAlbB , contributing to acyl moiety binding in MraY Aae , could not be predicted.).Alignments were performed with Clustal Omega, the position of specific residues is indicated for MraYAae.Compared with MraYAae [56][57][58], the three proposed catalytical aspartic acid residues (orange) and histidine (purple) residues within the active site of MraYCtr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm are highly conserved.MraYAae residues contributing to the binding of MRY D2 are indicated based on the respective MRY D2 moieties, which are uracil (red), 5′-aminoribose (green), and the peptidic side chain (violet) [50,54].The acyl moiety of cCPZ is bound in a hydrophobic groove in MraYAae (blue) [54].With a few exceptions, ).Alignments were performed with Clustal Omega, the position of specific residues is indicated for MraY Aae .Compared with MraY Aae [56][57][58], the three proposed catalytical aspartic acid residues (orange) and histidine (purple) residues within the active site of MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm are highly conserved.MraY Aae residues contributing to the binding of MRY D2 are indicated based on the respective MRY D2 moieties, which are uracil (red), 5 ′ -aminoribose (green), and the peptidic side chain (violet) [50,54].The acyl moiety of cCPZ is bound in a hydrophobic groove in MraY Aae (blue) [54].With a few exceptions, these residues are also conserved in MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm .MraY Aae contains an interfacial helix (IH), ten transmembrane domains (TM), one periplasmic helix (PH), and five cytoplasmatic loops (A-E).Conservation grade: fully conserved (*), strongly similar properties (:), weakly similar properties (.).
Our models for MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm further showed that the majority of residues contributing to the binding of uracil, 5 ′ -aminoribose, and the peptidic moiety of MRY D2, as well as the binding of a lipophilic side chain, are also highly conserved and are located at the surface of the protein (Figures 4 and 5; indicated in red, green, violet, and blue, respectively).In MraY Ctr , the amino acids F180, A188, and T299 of the lipophilic binding site of MraY Aae are not conserved; in MraY Cpn , the residues F180 and T299 as well as A321 of the peptidic binding site of MraY Aae are not present.The latter is also lacking in MraY wAlbB/wBm .Additionally, in MraY wAlbB , T75 of the 5 ′ -aminoribose binding site and in MraY wBm , I303 of the lipophilic binding site of MraY Aae are not conserved (Figures 4 and 5).
Together, the high level of conservation at the primary, secondary, and tertiary structural levels gives further evidence for similar enzymatic and inhibitory mechanisms of muraymycins versus MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm compared with MraY Aae .It is likely that MRY D2 and its derivatives fit into the binding pockets of the enzymes and thereby compete with the substrate UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide, leading to inhibition of the enzyme and, thus, depletion of lipid I within the cell.

Muraymycin D2 Eliminates Persistent C. trachomatis Cells from an Established PEN-Induced Persistent Infection upon Addition at the Mid-Stage of the Chlamydial Developmental Cycle
As we have shown, muraymycins target MraY and interfere with the cell division process in both Chlamydia and Wolbachia, leading to enlarged cells, phenocopying the PENinduced persistent infection in Chlamydia [14] and the fosfomycin-induced phenotype in Wolbachia [33].The mechanism behind the PEN-induced persistence in Chlamydia is not entirely understood.Because muraymycins and PEN G have different structural targets in PGN synthesis, we investigated the effects of simultaneous treatment with MRY D2 and PEN G on a chlamydial infection and if MRY D2 has an effect on an established PEN G-induced persistent C. trachomatis infection.The latter would also be of interest in the context of the treatment of chlamydial infections in vivo, where enlarged chlamydial cells have been observed and treatment failures with first-choice antibiotics have been reported [6,12,[16][17][18].
To study simultaneous treatment, we added 100 U/mL PEN G and 128 µg/mL of MRY D2 at 2 hpi to C. trachomatis D/UW-3/CX-infected cells to analyze any effects of a combined administration (Figure 6a).These experiments revealed that when MRY D2 and PEN G were added simultaneously, inclusions filled with ABs were visible as for PEN G alone (Figure 6b-d).
We next investigated the effects of MRY D2 on an established persistent infection by inducing persistence with PEN G at 2 hpi followed by the addition of MRY D2 at 12 hpi (Figure 6a).At this time point, chlamydial cells are usually in the mid-phase of their developmental cycle and have started replicating [14,51].In cells treated with PEN G at the beginning of the infection, ABs are visible after 12 h [14].After the application of MRY D2 at 12 hpi to the PEN G-induced persistent C. trachomatis infection, fewer inclusions containing ABs were observed (Figure 6b,d), corresponding to a 70% reduction of the inclusion quantity (Figure 6c).As a control, MRY D2 was also added alone at 12 hpi (Figure 6a) to the active infection at the mid-stage of the chlamydial developmental cycle.Again, 75% fewer inclusions were observed, of which 83% contained EBs/RBs and 8% contained a mixed phenotype (EBs/RBs/ABs) (Figure 6b,c).
In summary, we saw that the mid-stage application of MRY D2 to dividing or persisting Chlamydia results in clearance of the inclusions by the host cell.Early application of MRY D2 at 2 hpi (p < 0.0001) and simultaneous application with PEN G at 2 hpi induced the formation of ABs.Application of MRY D2 at mid-phase (12 hpi) did not lead to the formation of ABs, but fewer inclusions were observed (p = 0.0166).This was also visible if persistence was induced by PEN G at 2 hpi followed by MRY D2 addition at 12 hpi (p = 0.0037).

Discussion
The endobacteria Chlamydia spp.and Wolbachia spp.are of medical importance.Depending on the serovar, C. trachomatis can cause eye infections and infections of the ano-urogenital tract.Chronic or untreated infections can have detrimental long-term effects, e.g., blindness (serovar A-C) [1] or infertility in women (serovar D-K) [3,4].Genital chlamydial infections are treated with DOX or AZI [5]; however, an 8% treatment failure rate is reported [8,9], which might occur due to re-infection from the gastro-intestinal tract [10] or persistent C. trachomatis cells [6,12].Persisting chlamydial cells were shown to be less susceptible to DOX and AZI in murine models and cell culture experiments [11,[16][17][18].Wolbachia reside in the filarial nematodes W. bancrofti, B. malayi, B. timori, and O. volvulus [19,20].These nematodes cause the neglected tropical diseases lymphatic filariasis (lymphedema or hydrocele) and onchocerciasis (severe skin disease or vision loss).Anti-wolbachial treatment with DOX or rifampicin is the only effective and safe treatment against adult worms as Wolbachia are obligate endosymbionts that support filarial development, growth, and survival [23,24,27].Overall, contraindications for these antibiotics, including long treatment regimens for the anti-wolbachial treatment of filariasis, and treatment failure in Chlamydia require new strategies to fight these infections.
In this study, we explored the activity of the nucleoside antibiotics muraymycins and caprazamycins against Chlamydia and Wolbachia.Muraymycins and caprazamycins share a core structure comprised of glycyluridine, to which an aminoribose is attached at the 5 ′ position [43,44,46].In MRY D2, an N-alkylamide linker is attached to the 6 ′ position of the nucleoside and connects the core structure with a peptidic moiety consisting of L-Leu, L-epi-capreomycidine, and L-Val [43].Carbacaprazamycins, which have an acyl chain linked directly to the diazepanone ring, are chemically more stable derivatives of caprazamycin [49].Nucleoside antibiotics display structural similarity to UDP-MurNAcpentapeptide, the natural substrate of the transferase MraY, which catalyzes the formation of lipid I.This is the penultimate precursor molecule of bacterial PGN.Due to the structural similarity of nucleoside antibiotics and UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide, the antibiotics are competitive for the MraY binding site of the substrate [47,50,54] and thereby inhibit enzymatic activity, as shown for multiple species, e.g., B. subtilis and S. aureus [45,48,49].Binding of nucleoside antibiotics to MraY blocks lipid I formation and halts bacterial PGN synthesis.
Inside their intracellular niches, Chlamydia and Wolbachia are protected against osmotic stress [32], making a canonical cell wall redundant.However, both genera have retained all genes for de novo synthesis of the ultimate PGN building block, lipid II [32,33].We previously hypothesized that lipid II synthesis is essential for cell division of Chlamydia and Wolbachia and demonstrated functional conservation of the transferase MraY and the transglycosylase MurG, which catalyze the formation of lipid I and lipid II, respectively [32].Furthermore, some enzymes involved in the assembly, modification, and recycling of PGN are conserved [33,34].Later, it was shown that Chlamydia synthesizes a transient PGN ring that facilitates proper cell division initiated by a specialized budding mechanism [29,30,35,36], whereas the exact PGN structure in Wolbachia is still unknown.However, research in this field proposes a reduced PGN-like structure [31][32][33].Based on these observations, we postulated that nucleoside antibiotics, including muraymycins, exhibit antibacterial activity against the minimalist endobacteria Chlamydia and Wolbachia via inhibition of MraY, leading to interference of the PGN synthesis and cell division machineries.
The tested compounds were applied to C. trachomatis-infected cells at an early stage of the chlamydial developmental cycle (Figure 1a), before the bacteria started replicating [14,51].During the early treatment with MRY D2, the majority of muraymycin derivatives and cCPZ had MICs between 16 µg/mL for cCPZ and 128 µg/mL for MRY D2 (Figure 1d).These MICs were relatively high compared with the MICs of the first-choice antibiotics against uncomplicated chlamydial genital infections, DOX and AZI, which have MICs of <1 µg/mL against C. trachomatis serovar D in cell culture [62,63].All derivatives harboring the lipophilic side chain had more potent anti-chlamydial activity compared with MRY D2 as reflected by their lower MICs (Figure 1d).This is probably due to the increased membrane permeability of the derivatives, as the compounds have to pass four membranes to reach their target MraY in Chlamydia.The same effect was also described for free-living pathogens [47].
The stereochemistry of the bond linking the peptidic moiety to the nucleoside core structure (Figures 1d and S1) influenced the activity of the compound, as described in S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium [45,47].If the bond had an Sconfiguration, as in the isomers MRH-23 and -76 (32 µg/mL), the MIC for Chlamydia was two-fold lower compared with the R-configuration in the isomers MRH-22 and -38 (64 µg/mL, Figure 1d).Another structural feature that influenced the activity in S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. faecium were the amino acids of the peptidic moiety.The activity was two-to four-fold higher when the peptidic moiety included L-capreomycidine instead of L-ornithine [47].This seemed to be less relevant in C. trachomatis, as reflected by the same MIC for MRH-25 and -23 (64 µg/mL), which had the same structure but contained L-capreomycidine and L-ornithine, respectively (Figures 1d and S1).Furthermore, other studies revealed the importance of L-leucine of the peptidic moiety for the activity of the derivatives [45,47].Exchanging the accessory peptidic motif, including L-leucine and the N-alkylamide linker, for a C 12 side chain led to a much weaker activity similar to MRY D2 in S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. faecium [45,47].In our study, the muraymycin derivatives with the most reduced structure were MRH-38 and -76, which only retained the acylated Lleucine (Figures 1d and S1).They exhibited similar anti-chlamydial activity (64 µg/mL and 32 µg/mL) as the other derivatives (Figure 1d), highlighting the importance of the peptidic moiety for interacting with the target enzyme and thereby increasing the antibacterial activity of these derivatives.Based on our observations, improved anti-chlamydial activity of a muraymycin is obtained by acylation, which increases the membrane permeability, and by having an S-configuration of the bond linking L-leucine to the rest of the peptidic moiety.The lowest MIC measured for C. trachomatis was for cCPZ (Figure 1d).As proposed by others, the diazepanone ring might contribute to the higher anti-chlamydial activity by positioning the uridine, 5 ′ -aminoribose, and acyl chain to the respective binding sites in MraY [49,54,59].
Most muraymycins tested in this study induced the formation of enlarged chlamydial cells, with one to a few of these ABs per inclusion (Figures 1c and S2).The phenotype is similar to the one seen in PEN G-induced persistent chlamydial infection (Figure 1c) [14].Compared with MRY D2 inhibiting the formation of lipid I, PEN G acts downstream of MraY in the chlamydial PGN synthesis pathway (Figures 7 and 8).It binds to the transpeptidases PBP2 and PBP3 and the D,D-carboxypeptidase PBP6 [39,64], thereby inhibiting synthesis of cross-linked PGN and blocking cell division [36][37][38].Although PEN G and MRY D2 both halt chlamydial cell division, different processes are likely to be involved at a cellular level in the bacteria.PEN G-induced persistent chlamydial cells try to compensate for the growth defect by upregulating the transcription of several genes important for PGN precursor synthesis, including the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 1-carboxyvinyltransferase MurA and ligases MurD and MurE.However, the transcription level of MraY is not affected [65].Furthermore, it was shown by fluorescent labeling of PGN that the PGN ring dissociates under PEN G treatment due to continued PGN degradation accompanied by increased shedding of PGN material [38].
While a few small foci of nascent and non-cross-linked PGN are present under PEN G treatment at an early stage of the chlamydial developmental cycle [38], it is assumed that PGN synthesis is not initiated during the early application of muraymycins.First, transcription of most genes involved in lipid II synthesis starts between >8 hpi to ≤16 hpi [66], which is the time during which the first cell division takes place [14,51].This includes most Mur enzymes and MraY.Only transcription of the non-canonical alanine racemase GlyA, which converts L-Ala into D-Ala [67], and MurF, which ligates the alanine dipeptide to UDP-MurNAc-tripeptide [68], starts between >3 hpi and ≤8 hpi [66].These data indicate that the enzymes for lipid II synthesis, including MraY, are newly synthesized by Chlamydia after infection of a new host cell.It would then be inhibited by muraymycins directly or soon after the synthesis of the enzyme.Second, the levels of lipid II are predicted to be very low in Gram-negative bacteria compared with other lipids, as shown for E. coli, due to the rapid translocation of lipid II to the periplasm and its incorporation into PGN [69].Thus, even if there are some molecules of lipid I and II synthesized prior to the inhibition by muraymycins, only a few rounds of cell division might be possible.This would lead to inclusions filled with a few chlamydial cells, as seen for most of the tested muraymycins (Figures 1c and S2) and as shown for PEN G (Figure 1c) [14], compared with untreated inclusions filled with ~500 chlamydial cells [14,70].However, the presence of a few ABs per inclusion could also arise from multiple EBs infecting one host cell.Overall, we propose that upon early inhibition of chlamydial MraY by muraymycins, the production of lipid I and thereby lipid II is abolished and PGN synthesis is not initiated, leading to a block in cell division and subsequent enlargement of chlamydial cells lacking PGN (Figure 7a).
The phenotype induced by PEN G in chlamydial cell culture models is commonly referred to as a persistent state, which is characterized by an inhibition of cell division, enlarged chlamydial cells, an inhibited production of infectious progeny, and the reversibility of this phenotype.Two of these four criteria are fulfilled for muraymycins as the chlamydial cells stop dividing and appear aberrant.Whether or not the muraymycins induce a true persistent state in Chlamydia-infected cell culture models, which can be reversed after removal of the antibiotic, resulting in the production of new infectious progeny, needs to be addressed in the future.
As muraymycins had an effect on cell division in intracellular Chlamydia, we also investigated the effect against the endosymbiont Wolbachia.Although no canonical cell wall has been detected in this genus, a PGN-like structure was visualized using the clickable Dalanine analog ethynyl-D-alanine [31].We have shown that the endobacteria have retained the ability to form lipid II by MraY and MurG [32], and several other genes involved in PGN synthesis are also conserved [33].Of these, transcription could be proven for many genes from the Wolbachia endosymbiont of A. albopictus, including RodA, a protein of the shape, elongation, division, and sporulation (SEDS) family, the transpeptidase PBP2, and the carboxypeptidase PBP6a [33].In general, Wolbachia strains have retained at least one of the SEDS proteins, RodA or FtsW, and at least one monofunctional class B PBP [31,34].In Wolbachia of B. malayi and A. albopictus, PBP2 and RodA are conserved.Recently, both RodA and FtsW of several Gram-positive bacteria were shown to exhibit monofunctional glycosyltransferase activity [71,72], which would close the gap of the missing glycosyltransferases in Wolbachia.Thereby, a minimum of one putative glycosyltransferase and one transpeptidase would be present, which could catalyze the formation of a PGN-like structure in Wolbachia [31,34].Research on cell-wall-targeting antibiotics in Wolbachia is helping to elucidate the composition of the PGN synthesis machinery and PGN structure of Wolbachia spp.Since we demonstrated antibacterial activity of muraymycins against Chlamydia and Wolbachia in cell culture experiments, we next investigated whether this activity is mediated by MraY inhibition.Using inhibition assays performed with recombinant purified MraYCpn, we confirmed the enzymatic inhibition by MRY D2 and MRH-92 (Figure 3b).The enzyme was inhibited at a relatively low concentration compared with the MICs determined for C. trachomatis.This difference was also observed for MRY D2, in contrast to its

Cytotoxicity of Compounds toward HEp-2 Cells
Cytotoxicity of the compounds toward HEp-2 cells was assessed using the resazurinbased alamarBlue cell viability reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). 5 × 10 4 HEp-2 cells/mL were seeded into flat base TC-96-well plates (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2.After 48 h, the cells were washed with medium, followed by the addition of compounds in a serial dilution ranging from 128 In this study, the muraymycin derivatives MRH-76 and MRH-92 were tested for their antibacterial activity against Wolbachia in cell culture.Both had the same effect: they induced the formation of enlarged Wolbachia cells (Figure 2a, b) similarly to muraymycin treatment in Chlamydia and resembling the PEN-induced persistent phenotype.Unlike in Chlamydia, PEN G does not have an effect on Wolbachia [40]; however, the antibiotic fosfomycin, targeting MurA of the lipid II synthesis pathway [73] (Figure 8), also induced the formation of enlarged Wolbachia cells [33].The enlarged cells caused by muraymycins and fosfomycin indicate a block of cell division in Wolbachia due to the inhibition of lipid II synthesis [33].Although the exact PGN structure of Wolbachia remains to be described, we propose that PGN synthesis is abolished upon muraymycin treatment (Figure 7b).
Due to the shared similarities between Chlamydia and Wolbachia, it is conceivable that Wolbachia also try to compensate for the growth defect by increasing the transcription of genes involved in PGN precursor synthesis.Furthermore, fewer Wolbachia were detected in the host cells compared with untreated infected host cells (Figure 2c).The effect was more pronounced for MRH-76 compared with MRH-92 in regards to the wolbachial median cell diameter and the proportion of enlarged cells.Atwal et al. (2021) observed a similar bacterial depletion compared to the control in the D-cycloserine treatment against Wolbachia in Drosophila melanogaster [31].This D-amino acid antibiotic is commonly known to target PGN precursor synthesis by inhibiting alanine racemases and D-alanyl-D-alanine ligases involved in lipid II synthesis (Figure 8).Wolbachia has retained and expresses the enzyme Ddl and the alternative D-alanine racemases GlyA and MetC [33], the first two of which are potential targets for D-cycloserine, as shown for Chlamydia [67,74].Whether the depletion of Wolbachia by antibiotics targeting lipid II synthesis is an indirect effect of inhibited cell division and less growth over time and/or an active depletion of the bacteria needs to be addressed in the future.However, a similar effect could be expected for muraymycins in vivo in murine models or in patients if the compounds can be absorbed by the tissue, as observed for other Wolbachia-depleting antibiotics such as DOX and rifampicin [23,24].Analyses regarding the reversibility of the phenotype could elucidate whether fosfomycin and muraymycins can induce a persistent-like state in Wolbachia as defined for PENtreated Chlamydia.
Since we demonstrated antibacterial activity of muraymycins against Chlamydia and Wolbachia in cell culture experiments, we next investigated whether this activity is mediated by MraY inhibition.Using inhibition assays performed with recombinant purified MraY Cpn , we confirmed the enzymatic inhibition by MRY D2 and MRH-92 (Figure 3b).The enzyme was inhibited at a relatively low concentration compared with the MICs determined for C. trachomatis.This difference was also observed for MRY D2, in contrast to its acylated derivative, which had a 32-fold lower MIC for several S. aureus strains [45,47].The lipophilic acyl chain of the derivative increased the overall lipophilicity of the compound and thus the membrane permeability.The MIC of MRH-92 was > 64 µg/mL (Figure 1d).However, both compounds have to traverse four membranes in C. trachomatis-infected host cells to reach its target MraY in Chlamydia, a process which could contribute to higher MICs in general.Furthermore, the inhibition of MraY Cpn was not altered by the addition of a palmitoyl chain and further derivatization of the peptidic moiety in MRH-92 (Figures 1d and S1), similar to results obtained in inhibition assays with S. aureus MraY [48].
For a deeper insight into the enzymatic function and mode of inhibition, we performed a detailed analysis, which included alignments and protein prediction modeling of MraY from Chlamydia and Wolbachia in comparison to the well-characterized enzyme of A. aeolicus [50,54,58].We included four strains in the analysis: C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae, and Wolbachia endosymbionts of the human pathogenic filarial nematode B. malayi and of the mosquito A. albopictus; the latter was used for the cell culture experiments as Wolbachia of B. malayi is not culturable.
Due to the structural similarities of the MraY natural substrate UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide and nucleoside antibiotics, the antibiotics are able to bind to and inhibit MraY.One of the best-characterized nucleoside antibiotics is MRY D2, which is competitive for the nucleotide of UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide [47,50] and non-competitive for the substrate C 55 -P [47].Upon binding of MRY D2 to MraY, a conformational change of the enzyme widens the active site, creating a nucleoside-and peptide-binding pocket.The acyl chain of carbacaprazamycin binds in a hydrophobic cleft of MraY Aae .Our sequence comparison and 3D modeling of MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm against MraY Aae bound to MRY D2 [50] revealed that the amino acid residues important for binding to the uracil, 5 ′ -aminoribose, and peptidic moiety of MRY D2 and the acyl chain of cCPZ are, with a few exceptions, also highly conserved among these four species and face the cytoplasm or the hydrophobic cleft (Figures 4 and 5).In total, eight amino acids contribute to the binding of the lipophilic side chain in MraY Aae .In MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB , five to seven of these residues are present (Figures 4 and 5).The conserved residues in MraY Cpn are sufficient for the binding of MRH-92 as evidenced by the observed inhibition (Figure 3b).The MRY D2 derivatives are also able to exert antibacterial activity against C. trachomatis and Wolbachia (Figures 1d and 2).A residue that is not conserved in MraY Cpn/wAlbB is A321 of MraY Aae , which facilitates binding to the peptidic moiety of MRY D2.This part of the peptidic moiety is not present in the derivatives MRH-38, -76, and -92 (Figure S1); thus, this missing residue in MraY Cpn and MraY wAlbB is not important for binding these three derivatives.Since MRH-92 and MRY D2 abolished the enzymatic activity of MraY Cpn at the same concentration (Figure 3b), the amino acid exchange from A321 to a serine in MraY Cpn is not detrimental for the inhibitory effect of MRH-92 compared to MRY D2.This also fits with the observation that MRY D2 binding to MraY Aae was most disturbed by D193N and F262A mutations [50], of which both residues are conserved in MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm .
Considering the in vitro inhibition of MraY Cpn by muraymycins and the high level of conservation of residues contributing to binding of the antibiotics in MraY Ctr/Cpn/wAlbB/wBm , we postulate a similar mode of inhibition for muraymycins toward chlamydial and wolbachial MraY as for MraY Aae : muraymycins harboring the essential uracil moiety, the 5 ′ -aminoribose, and the 3'-hydroxyl group of the 5 ′ -aminoribose [59][60][61] bind to MraY of Chlamydia and Wolbachia via the conserved amino acid residues, leading to a conformation change in the enzyme.This binding is competitive for the nucleotide from the natural substrate UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide and non-competitive for C 55 -P.
Based on our observations that muraymycins inhibit chlamydial MraY and thereby block further lipid II formation, we were curious about the effects of MRY D2 on a PEN G-induced persistent infection with C. trachomatis.Compared with MRY D2, PEN G acts downstream in the PGN cycle by inhibiting PGN transpeptidation and remodeling (Figure 8).A persistent chlamydial state in cell culture models can be induced by βlactams or stress factors such as nutrient starvation or interferon-γ [13,14].However, the enlarged chlamydial cell phenotypes can also be detected in vivo in tissue obtained from patients [6,12].Several studies conducted in vitro showed evidence for β-lactaminduced ABs being less susceptible to treatment with the first-choice antibiotics AZI and DOX [16][17][18].Reduced susceptibility of persisting chlamydial cells could be one important factor in treatment failures in infected patients, resulting in reoccurring infections with potential long-term effects.Therefore, it is of importance to understand how persistence develops in Chlamydia and if persisting Chlamydia can be treated in vivo.
First, we tested the simultaneous application of MRY D2 and PEN G at an early development stage, which led to the formation of enlarged chlamydial cells, as seen for MRY D2 alone (Figure 6b and d).No synergistic effects were observed, which might be due to the fact that the effects of MRY D2 occurred upstream of the effects of PEN G activity in PGN biosynthesis.This result is similar to the activity of D-cycloserine.Recently, D-cycloserine was shown to target not only alanine racemases and Ddl but also transpeptidases in B. subtilis and E. coli due to their structural similarity with the native substrates [75].For Chlamydia, inhibition of the alternative racemase GlyA and MurC/Ddl was shown in vitro [67,74] (Figure 8), and treatment of C. trachomatis with D-cycloserine also leads to the formation of enlarged chlamydial cells [29].Simultaneous application of muraymycins and PEN G interferes with the same PGN synthesis sub-pathway as Dcycloserine, where the effect of inhibiting precursor synthesis outcompetes the inhibition of transpeptidation.However, treatment with D-cycloserine leads to ABs exhibiting nascent, non-cross-linked PGN instead of the lack of a PGN ring, with just a few remaining synthesis nodes of nascent non-cross-linked PGN, as seen with PEN G [38].
MRY D2 treatment of PEN G-induced persisting chlamydial cells cleared 70% of the infection in contrast to cells treated with the β-lactam only (Figure 6b,c).A reduced abundance of inclusions was also observed for MRY D2 treatment alone at the mid-stage of the developmental cycle in an active infection (Figure 6b,c).This indicates that while muraymycins had a bacteriostatic effect when applied early before the EB-to-RB differentiation and cell division, their later application exhibited bactericidal effects on actively dividing or persisting C. trachomatis cells.
One reason for the persistence-breaking bactericidal properties of MRY D2 could be the interference with another pathway besides PGN synthesis and/or a secondary target.Tunicamycin, another MraY inhibitor, additionally targets the glycosyltransferases TarO and CapM of the wall teichoic acid pathway and the 2-epimerases MnaA and Cap5P of the capsule synthesis in staphylococci [76,77].Although these enzymes and MraY catalyze different reactions, they all use an UDP-activated hexose as a substrate.Chlamydia do not possess wall teichoic acid, a capsule, or an O-antigen; however, enzymes of other pathways with a similar substrate as MraY might be inhibited, which could then lead to the detrimental effect of the mid-stage application of muraymycins.
Another possible cause for this effect might be the timing itself.Normally, chlamydial cells differentiate into RBs and subsequently start cell division at ~8 hpi to 12 hpi [14,29,51,70].During cell division, bacteria naturally shed PGN material into their surroundings; in E. coli, ~6% to 8% of their PGN is released per generation [78].In Chlamydia, PGN is degraded by the lytic transglycosylase SpoIID, resulting in anhydro-MurNAc-tetra-or pentapeptides and the amidase AmiA, which releases the peptide chain from the sugar [79,80].These PGN-derived peptides are subsequently recycled by the cytoplasmic peptidase YkfC by cleaving the γ-D-Glu-mDAP bond [81].PGN fragments containing MurNAc-L-Ala-γ-D-Glu and L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-mDAP motifs are ligands for NOD1 and NOD2 receptors, respectively.These are located in the host cell cytoplasm and exhibit immune modulatory properties via NF-κB activation and the transcription of cytokines [82,83].Application of muraymycins at the mid-stage of the chlamydial developmental cycle could lead to a complete block of new PGN synthesis that might be accompanied by continued PGN degradation.The antibiotic's interference with the pathway might lead to an increased shedding of chlamydial PGN, which could trigger the NOD-mediated host response in cervical HEp-2 cells and in cells of the female reproductive tract [84].This NOD response could contribute to the clearance of chlamydial inclusions by increased inflammation and autophagy [85,86].Although cell division is nearly completely blocked in PEN-induced persistent cells at 12 hpi [14], some PGN synthesis nodes remain [38].Furthermore, continued shedding of NOD1 and NOD2 ligands was also reported for C. trachomatis upon treatment with different β-lactams [38,87,88].An additional blockage of PGN precursor synthesis through muraymycins on top of the persistent state could then abolish the remaining PGN synthesis and intensify the cellular stress in these chlamydial cells.This might result in an enhanced NOD-mediated host response, eradicating Chlamydia from the host cells.
In contrast to cell culture infection models, Chlamydia infections in patients are not synchronized, and the pathogens are present at different stages of their developmental cycle, e.g., the early phase (before cell division started) and the mid-phase (active cell division).This could lead to mixed effects upon muraymycin treatment, inducing aberrance in the early phases and clearance in the mid phases.Cell culture infection models are also limited in reflecting the interplay of multiple stress-inducing factors like iron starvation, interferonγ induced tryptophan starvation, or viral co-infections that may contribute to persisting phenotypes within infected human tissues and impact the antibiotic effect.
The results presented here support MraY as a promising target for the development of new antibiotic treatment strategies against Chlamydia and Wolbachia.However, to progress to selecting a muraymycin as a lead candidate for development, further medicinal chemistry is required to improve its potency and solubility, with a focus on penetrating multiple membrane barriers to reach intracellular pathogens and more in-depth analyses of toxicity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) determination in appropriate in vivo models, and resistance development.
In conclusion, we showed that MRY D2 and its derivatives interfere with the activity of the transferase MraY in Chlamydia and Wolbachia.The structural conservation between the MraY of Chlamydia and Wolbachia and the MraY of A. aeolicus suggests that similar binding occurs in a competitive manner toward the natural substrate UDP-MurNAc.Treatment of Wolbachia with muraymycin derivatives resulted in the formation of enlarged bacterial cells, further strengthening the hypothesis that functional PGN synthesis is essential in these symbiotic bacteria of filarial nematodes.The effects of MRY D2 treatment on Chlamydia were dependent on the time of application.Based on these observations, we postulate the following: (i) in Wolbachia and nondividing Chlamydia in their early stage of the developmental cycle, inhibition of MraY-catalyzed lipid I formation has a bacteriostatic effect and induces the formation of enlarged, nondividing cells; (ii) the enlarged, aberrant cells lack PGN; and (iii) the interference of lipid I formation in actively dividing (mid-stage) or persisting Chlamydia abolishes (remaining) PGN synthesis and might also interfere with other bacterial or host cell mechanisms, resulting in a bactericidal effect on the Chlamydia.
The observed persistence-breaking property of MRY D2 could improve the understanding and treatment of reoccurring chlamydial infections in vivo.

Cytotoxicity of Compounds toward HEp-2 Cells
Cytotoxicity of the compounds toward HEp-2 cells was assessed using the resazurinbased alamarBlue cell viability reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 5 × 10 4 HEp-2 cells/mL were seeded into flat base TC-96-well plates (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and incubated at 37 • C and 5% (v/v) CO 2 .After 48 h, the cells were washed with medium, followed by the addition of compounds in a serial dilution ranging from 128 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL for another 28 h.Next, the cells were washed twice with Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) and incubated with the alamarBlue cell viability reagent diluted 1:10 in HBSS for 1 h.The conversion of resazurin into resorufin by viable cells was determined by transferring the supernatant into black 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) and measuring the fluorescence at 550 nm excitation and 595 nm emission wavelengths using a Tecan infinite M200 plate reader and Tecan SparkControl software v3.2 (Tecan Group, Männedorf, Switzerland).HEp-2 cell viability was normalized to the vehicle control, and the cytotoxic concentration 50% (CC 50 ) was calculated by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism v10.1.2(GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Effect of Compounds on Active and Penicillin G-Induced Persistent C. trachomatis Infections
The effect of the compounds on active C. trachomatis infections was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy.First, 3.5 × 10 4 HEp-2 cells/mL were seeded into black 96-well plates (ibidi, Gräfeling, Germany) and incubated for 3 days at 37 • C and 5% CO 2 .The cells were washed once with medium and infected with freshly prepared C. trachomatis D/UW-3/CX EB-containing suspension.After 2 h incubation, the EB suspension was aspirated, and the cells were washed twice with medium.The effect of compounds on an infection was determined by application of the compound at 2 hpi or 12 hpi in a serial dilution from 1 µg/mL to 64 µg/mL (MRH-25, -76, -92, cCPZ) or from 1 µg/mL to 128 µg/mL (MRY D2, MRH-22, -23, -38, and -82).Negative controls were conducted with DMSO as a vehicle control.For Chlamydia, the MIC is defined as a >90% reduction in inclusions [52].The MIC of compounds inducing the formation of enlarged, aberrant bodies is the lowest concentration that induces the abnormal inclusion morphology [39].
The effect of MRY D2 on penicillin-induced persistent C. trachomatis infections was analyzed as described for the active infection, with the following modifications.After removal of the EB-containing lysate at 2 hpi and washing of the cells, 100 U/mL PEN G was added to induce a persistent infection.MRY D2 was added at 12 hpi in a concentration range of 128 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL by serial dilution.In another approach, MRY D2 was applied simultaneously with PEN G at 2 hpi to determine if early administration influences the establishment of a persistent infection.
Infected HEp-2 cells were fixed and permeabilized with 100% (v/v) ice-cold methanol at 30 hpi and washed once with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 4 mM KH 2 PO 4 pH 7.4, 16 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , 115 mM NaCl).The Pathfinder Chlamydia Culture Confirmation System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) was used to stain the C. trachomatis lipopolysaccharide and host cell cytoplasm by incubation for 30 min at 37 • C. Genomic DNA was stained with 10 µg/mL DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 min and then washed twice with PBS for 10 min at 4 • C. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with an Axio observer Z.1 using the Zen2 software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Inclusions were quantified using CellProfiler 4.0.6.Cell image analysis software (Borad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA; [90]) was used to identify fluorescein-labeled Chlamydia clusters as the primary objects.The chlamydial cell phenotype in each inclusion was assessed manually and categorized by inclusions filled with (i) EBs and/or RBs, (ii) enlarged, aberrant bodies similar to the penicillin G-induced ABs, and (iii) a mixed phenotype of inclusions filled with EBs/RBs and AB (typically just one).Statistical analysis for all parameters was performed with an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-test against the respective vehicle control using GraphPad Prism software version 10.1.2for Windows (GraphPad Software).

Fluorescence Microscopy of Muraymycin-Treated Wolbachia
The effect of muraymycin derivatives on the phenotype of Wolbachia was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy as described [33], with minor modifications.Briefly, 1.5 × 10 4 A. albopictus C6/36 cells infected with Wolbachia were seeded into 8-well culture slides and incubated with or without compound at 26 • C. Medium was exchanged every third day, with and without compound.The cells were fixed on day 9 using 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS.The cells were permeabilized with 0.25% (v/v) Triton X-100 and washed with PBS supplemented with 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA Fraction V, Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (PBST).Genomic DNA was stained with 0.25 µg/mL DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich), and the cells were washed with PBST.Slides were embedded in Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA), and microscopy was performed with a Leica fluorescence microscope DM RD (Leica Camera, Wetzlar, Germany).Photoshop CS2 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for editing the sharpness, brightness, and contrast of the images.ZEN 3.5 (blue edition) software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used in combination with the image analysis module to determine the diameter of Wolbachia.Enlarged cells were defined as having a diameter greater than the 75th percentile of the DMSO control.For statistical analysis, a Kruskal-Wallis test was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 10.1.2for Windows (GraphPad Software).

Quantification of Wolbachia
Susceptibility of Wolbachia toward different compounds was tested as described [32,53].In short, 1 × 10 4 cells/well of A. albopictus C6/36 infected with Wolbachia were cultured in supplemented medium in 96-well plates with or without compound at 26 • C for 9 days.The medium, with and without compound, was exchanged every third day, and the cells were harvested on day 9 for the extraction of genomic DNA using the QIAamp Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol.Wolbachia were quantified by qPCR of the 16S rDNA gene of Wolbachia (GenBank accession No. X61767) and the actin B gene of A. albopictus (GenBank accession no.DQ657949) as described [32,91].A plasmid containing the appropriate insert was used to generate a standard curve to determine the copy number of the genes.The abundance of Wolbachia was normalized by calculating the ratio of 16S rDNA copies/µL to actin B copies/µL.

Purification of C. pneumoniae MraY
The heterologous transmembrane protein C. pneumoniae MraY (MraY Cpn , primary accession No. A0A0F7WR30) was produced as described in Henrichfreise et al. (2009) [32], with minor changes.Briefly, the plasmid pET20+mraY Cpn was transformed into E. coli C43(DE3) [92], and expression of transcription was induced in 4 L 2 × YT medium (16 g/L tryptone, 10 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl, pH 7.0) by 1 mM IPTG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at an OD 600nm of 0.6 with shaking at 25 • C for 16 h.Harvested cells were washed in 200 mL of 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) and resuspended in buffer A (25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 150 mM NaCl, 30% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM MgCl 2 ).After adding 1 U/mL benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich) and increasing the MgCl 2 concentration to 3 mM, the cells were sonicated and centrifuged at 31.85× g at 4 • C for 30 min.The pellet was resuspended in 10 mL buffer A supplemented with 17.8 mM n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and incubated for 50 min at 4 • C. The supernatant was separated from membrane debris by centrifugation, and the obtained pellet was solubilized a second time with 21.5 mM DDM.Each supernatant containing MraY Cpn was then incubated with 1.5 mL Ni-NTA agarose (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and equilibrated twice with 10 mL buffer A under gentle shaking at 4 • C for 3 h.The mixtures were poured onto affinity chromatography columns and rinsed with 7.2 mL buffer A followed by 7.2 mL washing buffer (buffer A supplemented with 3.9 mM DDM, 10 mM imidazole).MraY Cpn was eluted by the sequential addition of 3 × 0.5 mL elution buffer (buffer A with 3.9 mM DDM) containing 100 mM, 200 mM, and 300 mM imidazole, respectively.Eluates were stored at −70 • C.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Effects of muraymycin (MRY) D2, its derivatives, and carbacaprazamycin (cCPZ) on C. trachomatis.(a) The lead compound MRY D2 consists of a nucleoside and peptidic moiety made up of L-Val, L-epi-capreomycidine (Cpm), and L-Leu.The bond between the latter two has an Sconfiguration.(b) HEp-2 cells were infected with C. trachomatis D/UW-3/CX, the compounds were added at 2 h post infection (hpi), and anti-chlamydial activity was analyzed at 30 hpi by fluorescence

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Effects of the muraymycin derivatives MRH-76 and -92 on Wolbachia strain B of Aedes albopictus.(a) A. albopictus C6/36 cells infected with Wolbachia strain B of A. albopictus were cultured for 9 days with or without the compounds at varying concentrations.Treatment with 8 µg/mL MRH-76 or 32 µg/mL MRH-92 induced the formation of enlarged Wolbachia cells (exemplary cells indicated by white squares).Genomic DNA was stained with DAPI (green).Scale bar = 2 µm.(b) Using ZEN 3.5 (blue edition) with the image analysis module, the diameter of untreated and treated Wolbachia from 3 to 4 images was determined, shown as median ± interquartile ranges.For statistical analysis, a Kruskal-Wallis test was applied; p < 0.0001.n = 663 (control), 294 (MRH-76, 8 µg/mL), 348 (MRH-92, 8 µg/mL), and 298 (MRH-92, 32 µg/mL) cells.The cell diameter of Wolbachia cells treated with 8 µg/mL MRH-76, as well as of those treated with 8 µg/mL and 32 µg/mL MRH-92, was significantly larger compared with the vehicle control.(c) The depletion of Wolbachia from infected and treated C6/36 cells was measured after 9 days by extracting genomic DNA and measuring the ratio of Wolbachia 16S rDNA and A. albopictus actin B by qPCR; the median ± interquartile range from three experiments is shown.Wolbachia were nearly completely depleted by 4 µg/mL doxycycline (DOX), the positive control, whereas treatment with MRH-76 and MRH-92 led to a concentration-dependent reduction of Wolbachia, with 32 µg/mL MRH-76 showing a > 50% reduction compared with the negative DMSO control.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Effects of the muraymycin derivatives MRH-76 and -92 on Wolbachia strain B of Aedes albopictus.(a) A. albopictus C6/36 cells infected with Wolbachia strain B of A. albopictus were cultured for 9 days with or without the compounds at varying concentrations.Treatment with 8 µg/mL MRH-76 or 32 µg/mL MRH-92 induced the formation of enlarged Wolbachia cells (exemplary cells indicated by white squares).Genomic DNA was stained with DAPI (green).Scale bar = 2 µm.(b) Using ZEN 3.5 (blue edition) with the image analysis module, the diameter of untreated and treated Wolbachia from 3 to 4 images was determined, shown as median ± interquartile ranges.For statistical analysis, a Kruskal-Wallis test was applied; p < 0.0001.n = 663 (control), 294 (MRH-76, 8 µg/mL), 348 (MRH-92, 8 µg/mL), and 298 (MRH-92, 32 µg/mL) cells.The cell diameter of Wolbachia cells treated with 8 µg/mL MRH-76, as well as of those treated with 8 µg/mL and 32 µg/mL MRH-92, was significantly larger compared with the vehicle control.(c) The depletion of Wolbachia from infected and treated C6/36 cells was measured after 9 days by extracting genomic DNA and measuring the ratio of Wolbachia 16S rDNA and A. albopictus actin B by qPCR; the median ± interquartile range from three experiments is shown.Wolbachia were nearly completely depleted by 4 µg/mL doxycycline (DOX), the positive control, whereas treatment with MRH-76 and MRH-92 led to a concentration-dependent reduction of Wolbachia, with 32 µg/mL MRH-76 showing a >50% reduction compared with the negative DMSO control.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Effect of MRY D2 on PEN G-induced persistent C. trachomatis infections.(a) HEp-2 cells infected with C. trachomatis D/UW-3/CX were treated with 128 µg/mL MRY D2 at 2 hpi or 12 hpi to analyze the effect on active infection.Additionally, 128 µg/mL MRY D2 and 100 U/mL PEN G were added simultaneously at 2 hpi.To assess the effect on a PEN G-induced persistent infection, 100 U/mL PEN G was added at 2 hpi, and 128 µg/mL MRY D2 was added at 12 hpi.Anti-chlamydial

Antibiotics 2024 , 32 Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Muraymycins inhibit lipid I formation by binding to MraY and blocking lipid II and peptidoglycan (PGN) synthesis in C. trachomatis (a) and in Wolbachia of A. albopictus and B. malayi (b).Enzymes that are solely conserved in Wolbachia of A. albopictus (wAlbB) or B. malayi (wBm) are indicated.Dashed lines indicate inhibited/downregulated processes; dotted lines indicate uncharacterized processes.OM: outer membrane; IM: inner membrane.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Muraymycins inhibit lipid I formation by binding to MraY and blocking lipid II and peptidoglycan (PGN) synthesis in C. trachomatis (a) and in Wolbachia of A. albopictus and B. malayi (b).Enzymes that are solely conserved in Wolbachia of A. albopictus (wAlbB) or B. malayi (wBm) are indicated.Dashed lines indicate inhibited/downregulated processes; dotted lines indicate uncharacterized processes.OM: outer membrane; IM: inner membrane.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Antibiotic inhibition of enzymes catalyzing important steps in the different PGN synthesis and degradation pathways interrupt the PGN cycle in C. trachomatis (Ctr) and Wolbachia (Wol), leading to an arrest in cell division.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Antibiotic inhibition of enzymes catalyzing important steps in the different PGN synthesis and degradation pathways interrupt the PGN cycle in C. trachomatis (Ctr) and Wolbachia (Wol), leading to an arrest in cell division.