The Emergence of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Characteristics in Enterococcus Species Isolated from Bovine Milk

Enterococcus spp., including E. faecalis and E. faecium, pose risks to dairy farms as opportunistic pathogens. The study evaluates antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and virulence characteristics of Enterococcus spp. isolated from bovine milk. Bile esculin agar was used to assess 1471 milk samples, followed by colony identification, gram staining, catalase tests, and 45 °C incubation. PCR analysis targeted E. faecalis and E. faecium in characteristic Enterococcus spp. colonies, with MALDI-TOF used for negative samples. Multiple tests, including disk diffusion, chromogenic VRE agar for vancomycin resistance, Vancomycin Etest® for MIC determination, and PCR for virulence factors (cylA, esp, efaA, ace, asa1, gelE, and hyl genes), were performed. Out of 100 identified strains, E. durans (30.66%), E. faecium (26.28%), and E. faecalis (18.25%) were predominant. AMR in Enterococcus spp. varied, with the highest rates against rifampicin (27%), tetracycline (20%), and erythromycin (18%). Linezolid (5%), vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and teicoplanin (3% each) had lower prevalence. E. faecium and E. faecalis showed high AMR to rifampicin, erythromycin, and tetracycline. Thirty-two strains (18.98%) grew on VRE Chromoselect agar, while 4 (2 E. faecalis and 2 E. faecium) showed vancomycin resistance by MIC values. E. faecalis carried gelE (45.5%) and asa1 (36%), and E. gallinarum had 9.1% with the asa1 gene. Detecting resistant Enterococcus in bovine milk supports control strategies for enterococci on dairy farms, highlighting AMR concerns in the food chain.


Introduction
Bovine mastitis is considered an endemic disease, common and economically harmful to the dairy industry, causing physicochemical changes in milk that reflect its composition and quality [1][2][3].Antibiotic treatment of mastitis is a common practice; however, it is common for pathogens to acquire antimicrobial resistance, AMR [4], reducing cure rates and selecting drug-resistant opportunistic pathogens [5], such as the Enterococcus genus [6].
The Enterococcus genus is recognized as an important opportunistic pathogen group, with E. faecalis and E. faecium being the most representative species, accounting for over 80% of isolates associated with infections.These two species have been identified as the third and fourth most prevalent nosocomial pathogens worldwide [7,8].The genus is ubiquitous and can easily contaminate the food chain and affect intestinal colonization, including the human gut, where they usually are commensal microorganisms.When present in environments, they are indicators of faecal contamination in water [7][8][9].Similarly to the human microbiota, the Enterococcus species most commonly found in the animal microbiota are E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. hirae, and E. durans [8].However, many species from this genus can contaminate and colonize the teat skin, leading to bovine mastitis [4,10,11].The growing number of fatalities attributed to these bacteria is a cause for concern.In 2019, many deaths were linked to AMR, with E. faecalis and E. faecium as causative agents.The estimated deaths associated with these bacteria ranged from 100,000 to 250,000 [12].
Enterococcus is commonly observed in the food industry, mainly in dairy products, attributed to its high tolerance to disadvantageous conditions, allowing it to survive in adverse environmental conditions [11].The concerning emergence of multidrug-resistant enterococci and carriers of genes encoding virulence factors capable of evading the human immune system has been extensively researched [13][14][15].Enterococcus spp.can be reservoirs of AMR and virulence genes [6,8], and the ease of transmission and perpetuation of virulence and resistance genes to other species and different bacterial genera make enterococcal infection a significant concern for public health [16].Normal strains lacking genes for virulence factors may acquire virulence genes through horizontal gene transfer and spontaneous mutations [16,17].The virulence factors, including aggregation substance (asa1), collagen-binding protein (ace), virulence factor associated with infective endocarditis (efaA), enterococcal surface protein associated with biofilm production (esp), gelatinase (gelE), cytolysin (cylA), and hyaluronidase (hyl), play crucial roles in the invasion and spread of Enterococcus, thereby influencing its pathogenicity in bovine mastitis [11,[17][18][19].
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a global health concern due to their rapid spread and resistance to vancomycin, a critical antibiotic for severe Gram-positive bacterial infections.These multidrug-resistant bacteria pose risks to patient safety with increased morbidity and mortality [8,16,20].While vancomycin acts by blocking cell wall formation in bacteria, enterococci have acquired genes that allow them to bypass the susceptible steps targeted by the antibiotic, leading to complex resistance mechanisms [8,20,21].VRE has been detected in various samples, including milk, emphasizing the role of food in its dissemination [20,22].Furthermore, inappropriate use of antimicrobials in animal feeding contributes to VRE prevalence.It leads to multidrug resistance and nosocomial infections, particularly in developing countries where controlling its spread is challenging due to limited resources [16,23].
The involvement of enterococci in bovine mastitis is the most common reason for using antibiotics in dairy cows.It is particularly interesting due to the misuse of antibiotics in cattle and the broad survival characteristics of Enterococcus species in the environment associated with the ease of transmission of virulence genes between strains [17,24].Therefore, to assess the susceptibility profile of Enterococcus strains, a variety of antibiotics with different classes and mechanisms of antimicrobial action were selected.The chosen antibiotics included beta-lactams, glycopeptides, lipoglycopeptides, macrolides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, ansamycins, phenols, and oxazolidinones to cover a broad range of antimicrobial actions.
Due to the significant impact on public health, this research was conducted to examine the occurrence of Enterococcus spp. in bovine milk, with a particular focus on E. faecalis and E. faecium.The study also aimed to determine the prevalence of AMR profile (phenotypic), including vancomycin resistance and virulence genes (genotypic) among the identified Enterococcus strains.This knowledge is vital for developing effective control strategies in dairy farms, safeguarding public health, preserving the efficacy of antimicrobial agents, and ensuring the welfare and productivity of dairy cattle.

Prevalence of Enterococcus spp. in Bovine Milk
A total of 100 strains were identified as Enterococcus.The analysis revealed that E. faecium (26%), E. faecalis (22%), and E. durans (22%) were the most prevalent species among the identified isolates.These strains were sourced from different origins, including four samples obtained from cows with clinical mastitis, 34 with subclinical mastitis, 59 from healthy cows, and three samples that could not be classified into any of the abovementioned categories.
Our study revealed a more significant frequency of Enterococcus in healthy samples than in those with clinical and subclinical mastitis.Several factors can explain this finding.Enterococcus is considered an opportunistic pathogen and a commensal microorganism commonly found in the normal gut flora of humans and animals.Therefore, its presence in milk samples is expected, even when mastitis is absent.Furthermore, the higher prevalence of Enterococcus in healthy samples can be attributed to its commensal nature, ability to survive in adverse conditions, and intrinsic resistance mechanisms [11,13].Detailed information regarding the species distribution and sample sources is provided in Table 1.

Antimicrobial Resistance
Antimicrobial resistance testing was conducted to assess the resistance of the analyzed strains.A total of 13 strains (13%) were resistant to at least one antibiotic, 16 (16%) were identified as resistant to two antibiotics, and 13 (13%) were multi-resistant (resistant to three or more antibiotics).Additionally, three strains were found resistant to vancomycin in the disk test.Regarding growth on vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) Chromoselect agar, 32 (18.98%) strains exhibited characteristic growth according to the manufacturer s instructions.
Concerning the difference in antibiotic susceptibility among the same strains isolated from clinical mastitis, subclinical mastitis, and healthy samples, we observed a significant association between the type of mastitis and sensitivity to antibiotics, specifically vancomycin and teicoplanin.The proportion of sensitive isolates was higher in samples from healthy cows than those with subclinical mastitis for both antibiotics.Studies have shown that the composition and diversity of the milk microbiome can vary depending on the health status of the cows.Previous research has demonstrated that a balanced and diverse microbial community, including beneficial bacteria, characterizes the milk microbiome of healthy cows.In contrast, cows with mastitis may exhibit an altered milk microbiome with a higher abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria that could contribute to reduced antibiotic sensitivity.It is essential to highlight that Enterococcus may be a part of the healthy milk microbiota [15,25,26].
Based on our results, the higher proportion of susceptible isolates for vancomycin and teicoplanin in healthy samples compared to clinical and subclinical samples may be attributed to a more favorable microbial composition in the milk from healthy cows that potentially enhance the effectiveness of the treatment.However, it is essential to note that these results may not necessarily extend to other antibiotics, as no significant association was observed between the type of mastitis and sensitivity for the other antibiotics tested.In addition, individual variations, such as farm management practices, immune response, and genetic variations, could contribute to the observed differences in antibiotic susceptibility among the different milk sources [15,22].
The analysis of antimicrobial resistance was performed using the disk diffusion method, as shown in Figure 1, which clearly illustrates the distinction between antimicrobial resistance (Figure 1a) and susceptibility (Figure 1b) among the analyzed Enterococcus strains.Zone diameters were then interpreted and categorized according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M100-S24) breakpoints [27], classifying them as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant.The detailed results of this analysis are displayed in Table 2.Among the 100 isolates, the highest resistance rates were observed against rifampicin (27%), followed by tetracycline (20%), erythromycin (18%), penicillin, and nitrofurantoin (11%).Resistance rates were lower for linezolid (5%), vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and teicoplanin (3% each).
shown that the composition and diversity of the milk microbiome can vary depending on the health status of the cows.Previous research has demonstrated that a balanced and diverse microbial community, including beneficial bacteria, characterizes the milk microbiome of healthy cows.In contrast, cows with mastitis may exhibit an altered milk microbiome with a higher abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria that could contribute to reduced antibiotic sensitivity.It is essential to highlight that Enterococcus may be a part of the healthy milk microbiota [15,25,26].
Based on our results, the higher proportion of susceptible isolates for vancomycin and teicoplanin in healthy samples compared to clinical and subclinical samples may be attributed to a more favorable microbial composition in the milk from healthy cows that potentially enhance the effectiveness of the treatment.However, it is essential to note that these results may not necessarily extend to other antibiotics, as no significant association was observed between the type of mastitis and sensitivity for the other antibiotics tested.In addition, individual variations, such as farm management practices, immune response, and genetic variations, could contribute to the observed differences in antibiotic susceptibility among the different milk sources [15,22].
The analysis of antimicrobial resistance was performed using the disk diffusion method, as shown in Figure 1, which clearly illustrates the distinction between antimicrobial resistance (Figure 1a) and susceptibility (Figure 1b) among the analyzed Enterococcus strains.Zone diameters were then interpreted and categorized according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M100-S24) breakpoints [27], classifying them as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant.The detailed results of this analysis are displayed in Table 2.Among the 100 isolates, the highest resistance rates were observed against rifampicin (27%), followed by tetracycline (20%), erythromycin (18%), penicillin, and nitrofurantoin (11%).Resistance rates were lower for linezolid (5%), vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and teicoplanin (3% each).The antimicrobial resistance testing results revealed distinct patterns among different Enterococcus species.The E. faecalis strains exhibited resistance to tetracycline (27.3%), erythromycin (22.7%), and rifampicin (13.6%), while all strains displayed susceptibility to chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin.On the other hand, a higher prevalence of resistance was observed in E. faecium strains, with 42.3% being resistant to rifampicin, 50% to erythromycin, and 46.2% to tetracycline.Notably, resistance to ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol was not detected.Our results were similar to those reporting a higher prevalence of antibiotic resistance in E. faecium than in E. faecalis [28,29], highlighting the importance of surveillance and control of antibiotic resistance in Enterococcus species.In addition, among the other five species of enterococci identified, E. durans exhibited the highest resistance rates to the tested antimicrobials, with 59.1% of isolates being resistant to rifampicin, 40.9% to nitrofurantoin, 4.5% to ciprofloxacin, and 4.5% to linezolid.No antibiotic resistance was identified in E. gallinarum and E. saccharolyticus, except for two strains resistant to tetracycline and one to ciprofloxacin, respectively.All E. hirae and E. casseliflavus isolates showed sensitivity to the ten antibiotics evaluated.
In our study, tetracycline demonstrated notable efficacy against E. faecalis and E. faecium, emphasizing its importance as an effective antimicrobial agent.These findings align with a previous study by Yang et al. [6], which evaluated the antimicrobial resistance of E. faecalis isolated from bovine mastitis cases in China and found high rates of resistance to tetracycline (87.7%) and erythromycin (79%).These results underscore the importance of tetracycline as an essential tool in combating Enterococcus infections.
Erythromycin resistance was found in 22.7% of E. faecalis strains and 50% in E. faecium.The study by Nasaj et al. [30] supports our findings, as it reported 62.3% of E. faecalis and 86.6% of E. faecium as resistant to the antibiotic.On the other hand, Róza ńska et al. [11] observed a higher proportion of erythromycin-resistant E. faecalis strains (50.57%) compared to E. faecium (31.43%) in Polish dairy farms.Additionally, previous research has suggested a potential association between the high levels of erythromycin resistance and the widespread use of the antibiotic in animal husbandry [31].
In our study, the frequency of rifampicin-resistant strains was 13.6% in E. faecalis and 42.3% in E. faecium, the highest value among the tested antimicrobials.While rifampicin is not routinely used to treat infections caused by E. faecium, the species commonly present acquired resistance to this antimicrobial [32].Deshpande et al. [33] provided supporting evidence for our findings by reporting resistance rates to rifampicin of 5.9% in E. faecalis and 65.9% in E. faecium among strains isolated in the USA.In Europe, the rates were even higher, with 21.4% of E. faecalis and 67.5% of E. faecium.Yang et al. [6] identified 18.5% of E. faecalis strains resistant to rifampicin; Jahansepas et al. [29] isolated enterococci from human body fluids, predominantly E. faecalis and E. faecium, with resistance rates of 71.2% and 94.3%, respectively.Furthermore, Sharifi et al. [34] reported complete resistance to rifampicin in E. faecium (100%) and a substantial proportion in E. faecalis (81.2%), which supports our finding of higher resistance to rifampicin in E. faecium strains.
We observed that 34.6% of E. faecium and 9.1% of E. faecalis were resistant to penicillin.Depending on the species, Enterococci exhibit intrinsic resistance or reduced natural susceptibility to penicillins by expressing low-affinity penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) that bind weakly to beta-lactam antibiotics [8,35].Enterococci without intrinsic resistance to penicillins can develop acquired resistance, which is more common in E. faecium and rarer in E. faecalis [36,37].Our study corroborates the results obtained by Róza ńska et al. [11], where E. faecium exhibited higher penicillin resistance (5.71%) compared to E. faecalis (3.43%).
Chloramphenicol showed efficacy against all strains (100%), and ciprofloxacin was efficient against 97 strains (97%), in contrast to previous studies [6], where 14.8% of E. faecalis displayed resistance to chloramphenicol and 11.1% to ciprofloxacin.However, Róza ńska et al. [11] reported a higher frequency of chloramphenicol-resistant strains, with 49.43% in E. faecalis and 20% in E. faecium.Interestingly, their findings on the efficacy of ciprofloxacin appear to be consistent with our results, showing only 0.57% of resistance in E. faecalis and 2.86% in E. faecium.However, it is essential to note that ciprofloxacin exhibits only moderate activity against enterococci and is not the first treatment choice [38].Nitrofurantoin was also effective against 96% E. faecalis, and 8.33% E. faecium exhibited resistance to the antimicrobial.Notably, these results are consistent with those reported by Nasaj et al. [30], which showed 100% efficacy against E. faecalis and 25.4% resistance in E. faecium.
Resistant strains of E. durans to some of the evaluated antibiotics were found, as shown in Table 2. Our findings of E. durans resistance to rifampicin (n = 8) and nitrofurantoin (n = 13) align with the data from Výrostková et al. [24], which evaluated goat and sheep cheeses and reported that 100% and 66.7% of E. durans isolates showed resistance to rifampicin and nitrofurantoin, respectively.These results highlight the significance of E. durans as a species of interest and concern for public, animal, and dairy health.
In our study, linezolid demonstrated high efficacy against E. faecalis (95.5%) and E. faecium (88.5%) strains.Likewise, Nasaj et al. [30] obtained similar results, reporting linezolid s effectiveness against 100% of both species, while Róza ńska et al. [11] revealed resistance to this antimicrobial in 4% of E. faecalis strains and 2.86% of E. faecium strains.Despite the initial approval of Linezolid by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, the emergence of VREs quickly followed by identifying these strains in the United States in 2001 and subsequently in the United Kingdom in 2002.Their emergence is linked to genetic mutations and methylation events that affect the gene involved in the antimicrobial response [15].
Regarding teicoplanin, 4.5% E. faecalis and 7.7% E. faecium showed resistance.The study by Nasaj et al. [30] agrees with our results revealing higher resistance of E. faecium (73%) to the antibiotic regarding E. faecalis (5%), although with a more significant value disparity.Our prevalence results are similar to the study by Fernandes and Dhanashree [28], which reported 1.2% E. faecalis and 5.8% E. faecium resistant to the antibiotic.Notably, teicoplanin resistance shares the gene responsible for vancomycin resistance (vanA), raising concerns regarding public health implications due to the frequency of gene mutations and the potential for horizontal transfer among enterococci [39].
Because of the results of VRE, usually accompanied by resistance to other antibiotics, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined vancomycin-resistant E. faecium as multidrug-resistant organisms with high priority for surveillance [40], given that they have been extensively described in hospitals in recent decades [8].Among our findings, it was possible to identify VRE through antibiogram results and by observing the growth of colonies on VRE Chromoselect Agar in 32 strains.We found three multi-resistant strains on Mueller-Hinton agar, constituting 3%.These strains included two E. faecium and one E. faecalis strain.Corroborating the WHO definitions and findings by Cortés et al. [41] and Mannu et al. [42], 100% of VRE strains identified from Mueller-Hinton agar were resistant to at least five other antibiotics.
Previous studies in the European Union and the United States have identified a higher prevalence of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium compared to E. faecalis.These studies also highlight an increase in the majority of both species over time [8,39,41].Notably, the increase in the VRE prevalence in different countries has primarily been attributed to the incidence and spread of vanA and vanB genes accompanied by other virulence factors [21,30], which may be easily shared between species of the genus and, thus, may explain the increased incidence of vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis in recent years [8,39], as well as the VRE findings in the other species found in our study [43].
The Vancomycin Etest ® was performed to evaluate the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) required to inhibit the growth of E. faecium and E. faecalis, which were identified as antimicrobial-resistant strains in the previously discussed tests.Figure 2 provides a visual representation of the results of the test.Out of the 36 strains tested, 26 (72.2%) exhibited sensitivity to the antibiotic (Figure 2a), while four strains, including two E. faecalis and two E. faecium, were classified as resistant to vancomycin as evident by halo formation at a concentration of ≥32 µg/mL (Figure 2b) [27].Notably, 100% of the strains that showed resistance to vancomycin were resistant to 6 or 7 antibiotics in the antimicrobial susceptibility test, corroborating the WHO definition when considering VRE as a multi-resistance factor [40].However, it is worth noting that the use of this method for determining the MIC has been relatively limited in the existing literature.
The Enterococcus genus has become a significant public health concern due to its role in causing nosocomial infections, including Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), primarily caused by E. faecium and E. faecalis [44].The high incidence of HAIs caused by VRE and the increased number of antibiotic-resistant isolates found in recent years are of particular concern.For instance, in Germany, the percentage of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains increased from 10.5% in 2015 to 23.8% in 2018 [45], with some hospitals reporting as high as 80% of E. faecium isolates being resistant to vancomycin [15] constituting a significant concern for healthcare systems.
Antibiotics 2023, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 14 formation at a concentration of ≥32 µg/mL (Figure 2b) [27].Notably, 100% of the strains that showed resistance to vancomycin were resistant to 6 or 7 antibiotics in the antimicrobial susceptibility test, corroborating the WHO definition when considering VRE as a multi-resistance factor [40].However, it is worth noting that the use of this method for determining the MIC has been relatively limited in the existing literature.The Enterococcus genus has become a significant public health concern due to its role in causing nosocomial infections, including Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), primarily caused by E. faecium and E. faecalis [44].The high incidence of HAIs caused by VRE and the increased number of antibiotic-resistant isolates found in recent years are of particular concern.For instance, in Germany, the percentage of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains increased from 10.5% in 2015 to 23.8% in 2018 [45], with some hospitals reporting as high as 80% of E. faecium isolates being resistant to vancomycin [15] constituting a significant concern for healthcare systems.

Detection of Virulence Genes
Virulence factors play a vital role in the pathogenesis of enterococci [18].Previous research has highlighted the presence of various virulence genes in E. faecalis [46][47][48].However, it is noteworthy that these genes are more commonly found in E. faecium.Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of the prevalence of these genes among the tested Enterococcus species.

Detection of Virulence Genes
Virulence factors play a vital role in the pathogenesis of enterococci [18].Previous research has highlighted the presence of various virulence genes in E. faecalis [46][47][48].However, it is noteworthy that these genes are more commonly found in E. faecium.Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of the prevalence of these genes among the tested Enterococcus species.

Species
Virulence Genes (%) cylA esp efaA ace asa1 gelE hyl Various virulence factors have been attributed to playing different roles in the pathogenic potentials of Enterococcus spp.The gelE (45.5%) and asa1 (45.1%) genes were the only detected virulence genes in E. faecalis.For E. gallinarum, only one strain (9.1%) harbored the asa1 gene.None of the virulence genes were detected among E. faecium strains.As shown in this study, the most prevalent virulence gene for E. faecalis was the gelE gene which is involved in gelatinase production and enhances the survival of Enterococcus spp.The asa1 (aggregation substance-encoding gene) plays a significant role in enterococcal virulence.It enables the transfer of plasmids containing the sex pheromone gene and enhances virulence by promoting adherence to renal, cardiac, and intestinal epithelial cells [18].A study on mastitis and normal raw bovine milk revealed that E. faecalis harboring gelE (85.7%) and asa1 (71.4%) might be causative agents for mastitis disease.The study highlighted that bovine mastitis milk exhibited higher virulence properties than normal raw milk, emphasizing the clinical significance of these virulence factors [17].Likewise, our findings are consistent with those of Jahansepas et al. [29], in which a higher prevalence of gelE and asa1 was identified (88% and 74.4% of E. faecalis, respectively) compared to our results.Another study by Song et al. [47] found gelE and asa1 genes in 88% and 44% of E. faecalis strains, respectively.
On the other hand, Kiruthiga et al. [18] revealed that asa1 was the most common in E. faecalis among the five analyzed, followed by gelE, while gelE was more prevalent in E. faecium, followed by esp.In general, gelE and asa1 were significantly more common in E. faecalis when compared to E. faecium.The prevalence of virulence genes could enhance enterococcal infections and contribute to their pathogenesis.The evaluated strains in our study did not show the presence of cylA, esp, efaA, ace, and hyl genes.In contrast, Jahansepas et al. [29] found a higher frequency of the esp and hyl genes in E. faecium than in E. faecalis strains.These differences in gene prevalence highlight the genetic diversity and variability within the Enterococcus species, which may have implications for their virulence and clinical outcomes.
Taken together, the findings of this study highlight the importance of understanding the prevalence and potential risks associated with Enterococcus in dairy environments.Furthermore, identifying antibiotic resistance and virulence factors in dairy Enterococcus raises concerns about the possible transfer of these traits to human pathogens, posing a significant threat to public health.Therefore, it is crucial to establish stringent control and monitoring measures to ensure milk quality and mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes.In addition, future research should investigate the mechanisms of resistance and virulence gene transfer, specifically in dairy Enterococcus, aiming to develop strategies that minimize their dissemination.By addressing these issues, effective interventions can be developed to safeguard public health and enhance the safety of dairy products.

Identification of Enterococcal Isolates
A total of 1471 milk samples were collected from various herds in five distinct regions of Brazil, including São Paulo, Pará, Santa Catarina, Goiás, and Paraíba.The collection period was from March 2021 to February 2022.Among these samples, 720 were from healthy cows, 198 were from cows with clinical mastitis, 529 were from cows with subclinical mastitis, two were from farm bulk tanks, and 22 samples could not be classified accurately.The isolation was performed using the spread plate method with 100 µL and 10 µL, which were seeded with an L loop on the surface of Bile esculin azide agar (HiMedia) and incubated at 37 • C for 24 h.Enterococcus spp.were identified according to the results of the catalase-negative test (3% hydrogen peroxide), Gram stain (Gram-positive), and microscopic morphologic tests (cocci or short rod bacteria).Also, isolates were incubated in BHI broth at 45 • C for 48 h to select based on a temperature tolerance test.Strains exhibiting similar characteristics to Enterococcus were subjected to conventional PCR targeting E. faecalis and E. faecium.In cases where positive bands for both species were not detected, the samples were further analyzed using MALDI-TOF for accurate identification.

Identification of E. faecium and E. faecalis by PCR
DNA extraction was performed using the "InstaGene Matrix" kit (BIO-RAD) following the manufacturer s instructions.For each strain, 1 mL aliquot of BHI broth was added in a sterile 1.5 mL microtube and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min at room temperature.The supernatant was carefully discarded, and 200 µL of the matrix solution was added to the pellet.Microtubes were placed in a water bath at 60 • C for 25 min, homogenized on a shaker, inserted into a boiling water bath at 100 • C for 8 min, and homogenized once again, concluding the extraction.Finally, the resulting material was quantified using a NanoDrop Lite (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA).PCR reactions were performed in a thermocycler SimpliAmp (ThermoFisher, Marsiling, Singapore), and GoTaq ® kit reagents (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) were used in the amounts described by Jackson, Fedorka-Cray, and Barrett [49] with some modifications.For detection of E. faecium, the final reaction volume was 25 µL containing 10 µL of buffer, 4 µL of MgCl 2 , 0.5 µL of dNTPs, 1.5 µL of Primer Forward FM1 (5 -GAAAAAACAATAGAAGAATTAT-3 ), 1.5 µL of Primer Reverse FM2 (5 -TGCTTTTTTGAATTCTTCTTTA-3 ), 0.4 µL of Taq DNA Polymerase, 2.1 µL of ultrapure water and 5 µL of sample DNA.For detection of E. faecalis, the final reaction volume was 25 µL containing 10 µL of buffer, 2.5 µL of MgCl 2 , 0.5 µL of dNTPs, 1.5 µL of Primer Forward FL1 (5 -ACTTATGTGACTAACTTAACC-3 ), 1.5 µL of Primer Reverse FL2 (5 -TAATGGTGAATCTTGGTTTGG-3 ), 0.3 µL of Taq DNA Polymerase, 3.7 µL of ultrapure water and 5 µL of sample DNA.For both species, the cycle profile used was initial denaturation at 95 • C for 4 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 • C for 30 s, annealing at 55 • C for 1 min, and extension at 72 • C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72 • C for 7 min.Subsequently, PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gel containing SYBR ® Safe (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a 100 bp molecular weight DNA ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to validate the length of the products.

Identification of Enterococcus spp. by MALDI-TOF MS
Strains that grew in BHI at 45 • C for 48 h, along with bubble formation in the catalase test and/or that grew in VRE chromogenic medium but could not be confirmed as either E. faecium, or E. faecalis through PCR were sent to the Milk Quality Research Laboratory of the University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP) for identification using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for strains suspected to belong to the genus Enterococcus, according to Barcelos et al. [50].

Antimicrobial Resistance
The strains confirmed for the genus through PCR or MALDI-TOF analysis were inoculated onto plates containing VRE Chromoselect Agar Base (Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) to assess the emergence of VRE [51].In addition, the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the strains were determined using the disk diffusion method.
The E. faecium and E. faecalis strains confirmed to be resistant to vancomycin in the disk diffusion test were submitted to Etest ® (BioMérieux, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).The strains were seeded on the surface of plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar, and a strip impregnated with increasing antibiotic concentrations was placed above it.After incubation at 37 • for 24 and 48 h, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration values were determined following the guidelines outlined by CLSI M100-S24 [27].In addition, the study also included the evaluation of VRE strains targeting E. gallinarum and E. hirae.

Virulence Genes
The analysis of virulence genes was carried out through Conventional PCR.The selection of cylA, esp, efaA, ace, asa1, gelE, and hyl genes was based on their known association with virulence and relevance as indicators of pathogenic potential in Enterococcus species.A final reaction volume of 25 µL was prepared, containing 10 µL of buffer, 2.5 µL of MgCl 2 , 0.5 µL of dNTPs, 1.5 µL of Primer Forward, 1.5 µL of Primer Reverse, 0.25 µL of Taq DNA Polymerase, 3.75 µL of ultrapure water, and 5 µL of sample DNA.The specific primer sequences used for each gene can be found in Table 4.

Conclusions
We identified several species of Enterococcus, including E. faecium, E. faecalis, E. hirae, E. gallinarum, E. saccharolyticus, and E. casseliflavus.E. faecium was the most prevalent among these species within the Enterococcus genus.Virulence determinants were more common in E. faecalis, which harbored gelE and asa1 genes; however, virulence genes in E. faecium were absent.Considering the vancomycin resistance, we found the presence in our strains, emphasizing the importance of the control of AMR in food processing chains.In addition, the antibiotic resistance observed against rifampicin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and nitrofurantoin highlights the potential concern of these strains as reservoirs for antibiotic resistance genes.

Table 1 .
Frequency of Enterococcus species isolated from bovine milk.

Table 2 .
Antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus species isolated from bovine milk.

Table 3 .
Distribution of virulence genes among Enterococcus species from bovine milk.

Table 3 .
Distribution of virulence genes among Enterococcus species from bovine milk.

Table 4 .
Virulence gene primers for E. faecium and E. faecalis were used in the study.