Correction: Bonyár, A. Maximizing the Surface Sensitivity of LSPR Biosensors through Plasmon Coupling—Interparticle Gap Optimization for Dimers Using Computational Simulations. Biosensors 2021, 11, 527

In the original publication [...].


Error in Figure/Table
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figures 3 and 6 as published. The unit of D/D 0 (in the axes labels) is indicated as (nm), while it should correctly be dimensionless (-). The mistake only involves the figures; in the text and in the figure captions D/D 0 , was always correctly referred to as dimensionless. The corrected Figures 3 and 6 appear below.

Error in Figure/Table
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figures 3 and 6 as published. The unit of D/D0 (in the axes labels) is indicated as (nm), while it should correctly be dimensionless (-). The mistake only involves the figures; in the text and in the figure captions D/D0, was always correctly referred to as dimensionless. The corrected Figures 3 and 6 appear below. The author apologizes for any inconvenience caused and states that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Text Correction
There were two textual errors in the original publication. On page 4, in one instance, RISdim was written instead of ∆ , . A correction has been made to "3. Results and Discussion", first paragraph: "By depositing a dielectric layer of 5 nm thickness and nl = 1.5, the experienced tinction peak shifts were ∆ , = 6.1 nm and ∆ , = 18.2 nm (Figure 2b), correspo ing to an enhancement of 2.98 (EFt=5nm)." On page 5, in one instance, t = 7 nm was written instead of t = 5 nm. A correction has been made to "3. Results and Discussion", seventh paragraph: "The practical meaning of EFt is, for example, that dimer nanospheres of 70 nm ameter and 10 nm gap provide a 3.2 times higher signal compared to uncoupled sph of the same size with t = 5 nm layer thickness." The author apologizes for any inconvenience caused and states that the scientific clusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Text Correction
There were two textual errors in the original publication. On page 4, in one instance, RIS dim was written instead of ∆λ p,dim . A correction has been made to "3. Results and Discussion", first paragraph: "By depositing a dielectric layer of 5 nm thickness and n l = 1.5, the experien extinction peak shifts were ∆λ p,sp = 6.1 nm and ∆λ p,dim = 18.2 nm (Figure 2b), correspond to an enhancement of 2.98 (EF t=5nm )." On page 5, in one instance, t = 7 nm was written instead of t = 5 nm. A correction has been made to "3. Results and Discussion", seventh paragraph: "The practical meaning of EF t is, for example, that dimer nanospheres of 70 diameter and 10 nm gap provide a 3.2 times higher signal compared to uncoupled sph of the same size with t = 5 nm layer thickness." The author apologizes for any inconvenience caused and states that the scien conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Text Correction
There were two textual errors in the original publication. On page 4, in one instance, RIS dim was written instead of ∆λ p,dim . A correction has been made to "3. Results and Discussion", first paragraph: "By depositing a dielectric layer of 5 nm thickness and n l = 1.5, the experienced extinction peak shifts were ∆λ p,sp = 6.1 nm and ∆λ p,dim = 18.2 nm (Figure 2b), corresponding to an enhancement of 2.98 (EF t=5nm )".
On page 6, in one instance, t = 7 nm was written instead of t = 5 nm. A correction has been made to "3. Results and Discussion", seventh paragraph: "The practical meaning of EF t is, for example, that dimer nanospheres of 70 nm diameter and 10 nm gap provide a 3.2 times higher signal compared to uncoupled spheres of the same size with t = 5 nm layer thickness".
The author apologizes for any inconvenience caused and states that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.