MOF-Derived Cu@Cu2O Nanocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Cycloaddition Reaction

Research on the synthesis of nanomaterials using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are characterized by multi-functionality and porosity, as precursors have been accomplished through various synthetic approaches. In this study, copper and copper oxide nanoparticles were fabricated within 30 min by a simple and rapid method involving the reduction of a copper(II)-containing MOF with sodium borohydride solution at room temperature. The obtained nanoparticles consist of a copper core and a copper oxide shell exhibited catalytic activity in the oxygen reduction reaction. The as-synthesized Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst exhibited an enhanced limit current density as well as onset potential in the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Moreover, the nanoparticles exhibited good catalytic activity in the Huisgen cycloaddition of various substituted azides and alkynes under mild reaction conditions.

Recently, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), comprised of metal species and organic ligands, have attracted attention in the fields of catalysts, sensors, and drug delivery due to their large surface area, multi-functionality and adjustable size, shape and porosity [30,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. In particular, the integration of metal nanoparticles and MOFs has led to enhancement of the physicochemical, magnetic and optical properties of these species. MOFs themselves can be used as supports for encapsulating nanoparticles, and can also be used as precursors for porous graphitic carbon and as shell materials after thermal or chemical treatment of their organic ligands. Moreover, the metal species of MOFs have been employed as precursors to form nanocomposites with uniform shapes and high porosity. By directly producing or incorporating metal nanoparticles into the pores, cavities and channels of MOFs, improved structural properties of the nanomaterials can be achieved, thereby enhancing their application as catalysts, gas sensors and storage materials. In a different approach, nanoparticles have been coated with MOFs to hinder agglomeration of the nanoparticles, thereby retaining the catalytic activity and improving the reusability of the nanoparticles. Furthermore, the metal ions and organic ligands of MOFs can be used as a template or a metal precursor to form a porous metal nanoframe or to generate metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. In the structure of MOF, metal ions combined with organic ligands are scattered throughout the MOF and these scattered metal ions can be reduced to form a uniform sized and shaped nanoparticles without any surfactants and stabilizing agents [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].
In this context, we report the generation of MOF-derived Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst by a facile treatment. The Cu(II)-MOF, formed by the coordination of copper ions and benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxyate linkers, is transformed into smaller Cu@Cu 2 O nanoparticles using sodium borohydride solution as a reducing agent at room temperature. The catalytic activity of the obtained nanoparticles consisting of a copper core and a copper oxide shell, Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst, in the oxygen reduction reaction and the azide-alkyne Huisgen cycloaddition is also investigated.

Catalyst Characterization
The copper-based MOF, Cu 3 (BTC) 2 (referred to hereinafter as "Cu(II)-MOF"), was prepared using copper(II) nitrate and H 3 BTC (H 3 BTC = benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid) in a mixture of N,N-dimethylformamide, ethanol and water through the solvothermal method reported in the literature [55][56][57][58]. The copper-based MOF was transformed into smaller copper nanoparticles (referred to hereinafter as "Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst") by reduction with 10 eq. of sodium borohydride solution. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the Cu(II)-MOF and MOF-derived Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst are displayed in Figure 1a,b. The Cu(II)-MOF comprised irregular microstructures with an average diameter of approximately 5.0 µm. Generally, the metal nanoparticles which are formed from metal ions of MOF are very close to each other due to the structure of the MOF, so that the metal nanoparticles easily form small agglomerates [16,48,52,59,60]. As shown in Figure 1c-e, the SEM and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images confirm that the copper ions in the Cu(II)-MOF are transformed to spherical nanoparticles with average diameter of approximately 14.8 nm and copper nanoparticles tend to form small agglomerates. The elemental mapping image in Figure 1f shows that more oxygen is distributed on the outer surface of copper nanoparticles showing that surface of the small agglomerate of the copper nanoparticles is unevenly oxidized to copper oxide shell.   Figure 2c shows that the XRD pattern of Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst is consistent with the reference data for Cu and Cu 2 O. The crystalline size and shell thickness of Cu (111) and Cu 2 O (111) calculated from XRD data are 13.5 nm and 5.07 nm, respectively. And the Cu/Cu 2 O ratio was calculated from ICP and elemental analysis data and the ratio was confirmed as 1:0.8. The presence of copper and oxygen as the main elements was confirmed by ICP and elemental analysis data, and the Cu/Cu 2 O ratio was 1:0.8 which was calculated based on the amount of oxygen. re 1. (a,b) SEM images of Cu(II)-MOF; (c) SEM and FE-SEM (inset) images of Cu@Cu2O -shell nanocatalyst and (d,e) TEM images of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst; (f) elemental ping and HAADF-STEM image (inset) of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst (red for copper, n for oxygen). The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patte were acquired to verify the formation of Cu(II)-MOF and Cu@Cu2O. The FT-IR spectrum Cu(II)-MOF in Figure 2a shows absorption peaks near 480 and 730 cm −1 that can be assigned to t characteristic Cu-O stretching vibration. The characteristic peaks near 1110, 1380 and 1640 cm −1 a attributed to CO-Cu stretching and the two CO stretching vibrations of the carboxyl group. T XRD pattern in Figure 2b shows very sharp diffraction peaks at 11.56°, 13.39°, 14.64°, 15.01°, 16.4 17.44°, and 19.04°, corresponding to the (222), (400), (331), (420), (422), (333), and (440) crystalli planes of Cu(II)-MOF. Figure 2c shows that the XRD pattern of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst consistent with the reference data for Cu and Cu2O. The crystalline size and shell thickness of C (111) and Cu2O (111) calculated from XRD data are 13.5 nm and 5.07 nm, respectively. And t Cu/Cu2O ratio was calculated from ICP and elemental analysis data and the ratio was confirmed 1:0.8. The presence of copper and oxygen as the main elements was confirmed by ICP and elemen analysis data, and the Cu/Cu2O ratio was 1:0.8 which was calculated based on the amount of oxyge Furthermore, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the compositi and chemical state of Cu(II)-MOF and Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst. The XPS survey spectru of Cu(II)-MOF in Figure 3a shows peaks at ca. 531.8 eV for O 1s, ca. 399.4 eV for N 1s a ca. 284.6 eV for C 1s; two characteristic peaks of Cu(II) were observed in the Cu 2p region at bindi energies of 934.9 and 954.7 eV, corresponding to Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2, respectively. Furthermo Cu(II)-MOF (Figure 3a) reveals the presence of two strong satellite features on the higher bindi energies centered at 938-946 eV and 961-965 eV corresponding to Cu 2p, which is also evidence t presence of Cu(II) in Cu(II)-MOF. To note, the binding energy values of the Cu 2p3/2 (932 eV) a Cu 2p1/2 (952 eV) in Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst (Figure 3b) are shifted as compared to t Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 values in Cu(II)-MOF ( Figure 3a). And, the binding energy of pea corresponding to the satellite features of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst (Figure 3b) showed ve tiny peak intensities (due to the insignificant amount of CuO formation from slightly oxidiz surface of Cu2O shell via atmospheric exposure) as compared to the peak intensities of Cu(II)-MO ( Figure 3a). Thus, the shifts in the binding energy values of Cu 2p3/2, Cu 2p1/2 and reduction of stro  [61,62]. Considering both the XRD and XPS results, it is reasonable to deduce that the copper ions in the MOF were adequately reduced to Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst.

Electrocatalytic Activity of Cu@Cu2O Core-Shell Nanocatalyst
In order to assess the ORR electrocatalytic activity of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH using a glass carbon (GC) disk electrode loaded with the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst were employed as convenient and efficient tools (as described in the Materials and Methods section). The CV curve of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst (Figure 4a) was used to explore the redox reactions involved. In the strong 0.1 M KOH electrolyte, a pair of anodic (1.075 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) and cathodic (0.69 V vs. RHE) peaks was clearly observed at a scan rate of 0.02 V s −1 , which indicates Faradaic redox reactions (Cu 2+ /Cu + ) of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst. Further, the electrocatalytic activity towards the ORR is clearly demonstrated in Figure 4b, where the oxygen reduction peak potential shifted to a more positive direction with a high peak current density in the presence of O2 (Figure 4b curve i) than in the presence of Ar (Figure 4b curve ii).
In order to elucidate the mechanism of enhancement of the electrocatalytic activity of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst in the ORR, LSV measurements (Figure 5 a) were performed using a rotating-disk electrode (RDE) in the applied potential range of 0.2-1.4 V vs. RHE in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution (scan rate = 0.02 V s −1 ; the electrode rotating speed was varied as 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000 and 2500 r.p.m.). The ORR polarization curves of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst demonstrate enhancement of the limit current density as well as the more positive onset potential (Eonset = 0.93 V vs. RHE). The Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst showed a half-wave potential (E1/2) of 0.86 V vs. RHE at 1600 r.p.m., which is comparatively higher than the reported values for Cu-based ORR catalysts such as rGO-TADPyCu (E1/2 = 0.795 V) [63], Cu-Nx/C [0.755 V] [64]. To quantitatively evaluate the ORR electrocatalytic activity of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst, the Koutecky-Levich (K-L) plots based on the LSV measurements in the potential range of 0.45-0.70 V vs. RHE at various rotating speeds were used to calculate the corresponding electron transfer

Electrocatalytic Activity of Cu@Cu 2 O Core-Shell Nanocatalyst
In order to assess the ORR electrocatalytic activity of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in O 2 -saturated 0.1 M KOH using a glass carbon (GC) disk electrode loaded with the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst were employed as convenient and efficient tools (as described in the Materials and Methods section). The CV curve of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst (Figure 4a) was used to explore the redox reactions involved. In the strong 0.1 M KOH electrolyte, a pair of anodic (1.075 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) and cathodic (0.69 V vs. RHE) peaks was clearly observed at a scan rate of 0.02 V s −1 , which indicates Faradaic redox reactions (Cu 2+ /Cu + ) of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst. Further, the electrocatalytic activity towards the ORR is clearly demonstrated in Figure 4b, where the oxygen reduction peak potential shifted to a more positive direction with a high peak current density in the presence of O 2 ( Cu2O-20 (n = 2.04)) [65]. These are confirmed that the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst has direct 4-electron transfer pathway in ORR due to the synergistic morphological effects of a core-shell nanostructure, well dispersed Cu2O and the high, strong adsorption of O2 on Cu@Cu2O surfaces. There are might be the reasons for the superior electrocatalytic activity of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst towards ORR. These results evidently suggested that the prepared Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst is the highly selective 4-electron transfer pathway with more positive Eonset = 0.93 V vs. RHE toward ORR.  In order to elucidate the mechanism of enhancement of the electrocatalytic activity of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst in the ORR, LSV measurements (Figure 5 a) were performed using a rotating-disk electrode (RDE) in the applied potential range of 0.2-1.4 V vs. RHE in O 2 -saturated 0.1 M KOH solution (scan rate = 0.02 V s −1 ; the electrode rotating speed was varied as 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000 and 2500 r.p.m.). The ORR polarization curves of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst demonstrate enhancement of the limit current density as well as the more positive onset potential (E onset = 0.93 V vs. RHE). The Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst showed a half-wave potential (E 1/2 ) of 0.86 V vs. RHE at 1600 r.p.m., which is comparatively higher than the reported values for Cu-based ORR catalysts such as rGO-TADPyCu (E 1/2 = 0.795 V) [63], Cu-N x /C [0.755 V] [64]. To quantitatively evaluate the ORR electrocatalytic activity of Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst, the Koutecky-Levich (K-L) plots based on the LSV measurements in the potential range of 0.45-0.70 V vs. RHE at various rotating speeds were used to calculate the corresponding electron transfer number (Figure 5b). The corresponding K-L plots show good linearity and also parallelism of plots indicate the first order kinetics towards ORR in alkaline electrolyte. The electron transfer number of Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst estimated from the slope of the K-L plots is averagely 3.97 at 0.45-0.7 V, suggested a principal 4-electron transfer pathway. The n = 3.97 is higher than already reported on various shape controlled Cu 2 O nanostructures (Cu 2 O-70 (n = 3.74); Cu 2 O-50 (n = 3.22) and Cu 2 O-20 (n = 2.04)) [65]. These are confirmed that the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst has direct 4-electron transfer pathway in ORR due to the synergistic morphological effects of a core-shell nanostructure, well dispersed Cu 2 O and the high, strong adsorption of O 2 on Cu@Cu 2 O surfaces. There are might be the reasons for the superior electrocatalytic activity of Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst towards ORR. These results evidently suggested that the prepared Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst is the highly selective 4-electron transfer pathway with more positive E onset = 0.93 V vs. RHE toward ORR.
indicate the first order kinetics towards ORR in alkaline electrolyte. The electron transfer number of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst estimated from the slope of the K-L plots is averagely 3.97 at 0.45-0.7 V, suggested a principal 4-electron transfer pathway. The n = 3.97 is higher than already reported on various shape controlled Cu2O nanostructures (Cu2O-70 (n = 3.74); Cu2O-50 (n = 3.22) and Cu2O-20 (n = 2.04)) [65]. These are confirmed that the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst has direct 4-electron transfer pathway in ORR due to the synergistic morphological effects of a core-shell nanostructure, well dispersed Cu2O and the high, strong adsorption of O2 on Cu@Cu2O surfaces. There are might be the reasons for the superior electrocatalytic activity of Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst towards ORR. These results evidently suggested that the prepared Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanocatalyst is the highly selective 4-electron transfer pathway with more positive Eonset = 0.93 V vs. RHE toward ORR.

Catalytic Activity of Cu@Cu2O Core-Shell Nanocatalyst in Azide-Alkyne Huisgen Cycloaddition
Huisgen azide-alkyne cycloaddition is a representative reaction of click chemistry, especially under the copper catalysis, produces a 1,2,3-triazoles as a product which can be applied in organic

General Remarks
The morphology of the samples was analyzed by using a Zeiss Supra 40 VP field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operating at 15 kV. The size and morphology were characterized by using a JEOL JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku D/MAX-RB (12 kW; Rigaku, Shibuya-ku, Japan) diffractometer. Fourier-transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) and X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on Nicolet 380 (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) and ESCALab250 (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) instruments, respectively. Electrochemical measurements were performed by using an electrochemical workstation (CHI600E, CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) with a three-electrode system. The progress of the catalytic reaction was observed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS; Shimadzu-QP2010 SE, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). All chemicals were used as received without further purification.
The as-synthesized Cu(II)-MOF (0.5 g) was dissolved in deionized (DI) water (20 mL) with stirring. NaBH 4 solution (10 eq.) was added dropwise with stirring in an ice-bath. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. The resultant particles were washed with water and ethanol and dried under vacuum.

Electrode Preparation and Electrochemical Measurements
The electrochemical and electrocatalytic performance of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst was investigated through cyclic voltammetry (CV) and by using a rotating disc electrode (RDE, AFMSRCE, Pine Research Instruments, Durham, NC, USA) in an O 2 -saturated (0.1 M KOH) electrolyte at a scan rate of 20 mV s −1 . For the three-electrode system, a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) and graphite electrode were used as the reference and counter electrodes, respectively. The Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst (5 mg) was dispersed in 200 µL of ink solution containing isopropyl alcohol (140 µL), deionized water (40 µL) and Nafion solution (20 µL) in a 7:2:1 (v/v) ratio and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 1 h to obtain a homogeneous suspension of the prepared ink solution. The Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst ink (10 µL) was dropped onto the surface of a glassy carbon disk (working electrode, area = 0.1963 cm 2 ) and dried at 60 • C for 30 min. A conventional RDE three-compartmental glass cell was used. All experiments were performed at room temperature. The ORR performance was measured in O 2 -saturated 0.1 M KOH electrolyte. To avoid the influence of the reduction of Cu 2+ and set the background correction, an Ar-saturated 0.1 M KOH electrolyte was used under the same experimental conditions. In this study, all reported potentials were converted from the Ag/AgCl to the RHE scale using E (RHE) = E (Ag/AgCl) + 0.198 V in 0.1 M KOH. The number of electrons transferred during the ORR was calculated from the Koutecky-Levich (K-L) plot, which is determined by Equations (1) and (2).
1/J = 1/J L + 1/J K = 1/Bω 1/2 + 1/J K where J, J L and J K are the values of the experimentally measured current and kinetic and diffusion-limiting current densities, respectively; ω is the angular velocity of the disk, and B can be defined as follows: where F is the Faraday constant (96,485.34 C mol −1 ), C O is the bulk concentration of O 2 (1.2 × 10 −6 mol cm −3 ), ϑ is the kinematic viscosity of the electrolyte (ϑ = 0.01 cm 2 s −1 , D O is the diffusion coefficient of O 2 in 0.1 M KOH (1.9 × 10 −5 cm 2 s −1 ) and n is the number of electrons transferred during the electrochemical reaction. The value of n can be calculated from the slope of the J −1 vs. ω −1⁄2 plot.

General Procedure for Azide-Alkyne Huisgen Cycloadditions
Benzyl azide (1 mmol), phenyl acetylene (1.5 mmol), water (2.0 mL), tert-butyl alcohol (1.0 mL) and Cu@Cu 2 O nanocatalyst (2.3 mol %) were placed into a 10 mL sealed aluminum vial with a butyl gum septum. The mixture was stirred at 50 • C for 5 h. After the reaction, the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst were separated from the clear solution. The products were analyzed by 1 H-NMR and GC/MS.

Conclusions
In summary, Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst with a diameter of 74 nm was easily synthesized through the sodium borohydride reduction of Cu(II)-MOF and Cu 3 (BTC) 2 . The ORR polarization curves of the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst show an improved limit current density and onset potential (E onset = 0.93 V vs. RHE). The electron transfer number for the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst is 3.97 and this catalyst operates by a 4-electron transfer pathway in the ORR. We have reason to believe that the Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst will extend the understanding of non-noble metal/metal oxide catalysis and direct the rational strategy of non-noble metal/metal oxide catalysts for the ORR. Also, Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst exhibits good catalytic activity in the azide-alkyne Huisgen cycloaddition of various substituents under mild reaction conditions. The simply-obtained MOF-derived copper-copper oxide nanoparticles were successfully employed as a nanocatalyst in both organic reactions and electrochemical catalysis. The prepared Cu@Cu 2 O core-shell nanocatalyst can circumvent the problems encountered with peroxide, such as corrosion or premature degradation of the cells. However, in order to replace costly platinum-based catalysts in fuel cells with the current type of composites, systematic studies should be conducted to enhance the kinetic current density as well as stability of the catalysts.