Copper(II) and Cobalt(II) Complexes Based on Abietate Ligands from Pinus Resin: Synthesis, Characterization and Their Antibacterial and Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2

Co-abietate and Cu-abietate complexes were obtained by a low-cost and eco-friendly route. The synthesis process used Pinus elliottii resin and an aqueous solution of CuSO4/CoSO4 at a mild temperature (80 °C) without organic solvents. The obtained complexes are functional pigments for commercial architectural paints with antipathogenic activity. The pigments were characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), mass spectrometry (MS), thermogravimetry (TG), near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and colorimetric analysis. In addition, the antibacterial efficiency was evaluated using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test, and the antiviral tests followed an adaptation of the ISO 21702:2019 guideline. Finally, virus inactivation was measured using the RT-PCR protocol using 10% (w/w) of abietate complex in commercial white paint. The Co-abietate and Cu-abietate showed inactivation of >4 log against SARS-CoV-2 and a MIC value of 4.50 µg·mL−1 against both bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli). The results suggest that the obtained Co-abietate and Cu-abietate complexes could be applied as pigments in architectural paints for healthcare centers, homes, and public places.


Introduction
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (named COVID-19 by the WHO on 11 February 2020) pandemic. Coronaviruses (CoVs) are enveloped positive single−strand RNA viruses. CoVs are classified into four genera, α-, β-, γand δ-coronaviruses. β-CoV is responsible for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and SARS-CoV-2 (also known as 2019-nCoV) [1]. The SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes for a spike−like glycoprotein (S) outside the viral particle, where it can bind to a cellular receptor and mediate membrane fusion and virus entry [2]. The initial COVID-19 outbreak was reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and expanded globally, infecting almost 35 million people and causing more than a million deaths [1], devastating the world's economy [3]. The first vaccines reduced the number of hospitalizations, deaths, and infection incidence. However, disinfection methods play a significant role in controlling For the metal−abietate synthesis, the resin of Pinus elliottii var. elliottii is supplied in nature by Guarapuava, Parana State, Brazil producers. This resin was purified following the method reported in ref. [22].
All reagents are from Sigma Aldrich (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) (puriss. PA). First, the purified Pinus resin and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, PA) were dissolved in water and mixed in a molar proportion of 1:1, with mechanically stirring for 3 h, at 90 • C, until the formation of a hygroscopic salt (Na-abietate), as reported in [23]. Next, the Na-abietate was macerated in an agate mortar with a pestle. Then Na-abietate and cobalt sulfate (CoSO 4 , P.A.) was dissolved separately in water. These solutions were mixed dropwise in molar proportions of 3:1 (Na-abietate: Co 2+ ), forming the Co-abietate complex instantaneously. Next, this complex was washed out with deionized water, filtered, and dried in an oven at 70 • C for 5 h. Finally, the powder was characterized and applied as an antibacterial pigment in a commercial white paint. This procedure was repeated for copper, using CuSO 4 , to form Cu-abietate [24].

Material Characterization
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer Frontier spectrometer (Pontyclun, Mid Glamorgan, UK) in the 4000-650 cm −1 region. The samples were analyzed in the Eco-ATR attenuated total reflectance acquisition mode, equipped with a high-capacity ZnSe ATR crystal to analyze powders, solids, pastes, and liquids. Eight scans were performed with a spectral resolution of 2 cm −1 .
The mass spectra (MS) of abietate complexes were obtained from a solution of dichloromethane (DCM) diluted in methanol injected in a Bruker Amazon Speed ETD equipment from Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA, ion trap (MS-MS) with low resolution, in negative ion and ionization by electrospray mode. A drying gas flow of 4 L·min −1 was used at a temperature of 200 • C, nitrogen as a nebulizer gas under pressure of 7 psi, and a voltage of 4500 V.
The NEXAFS spectra were recorded at the XM-beamline (U41-PGM1-XM) at BESSY II, Berlin. The TXM optical design combines a spectral resolution of E/∆E = 1 × 10 4 with a spatial resolution of 25 nm in a field of view of 15-20 µm. The design of the X-ray microscopy beamline U41-PGM1-XM allows analysis in the soft (0.25-1.5 keV) and tender X-ray photon energy regime (1-2.7 keV) [25,26].
The chemical composition was evaluated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Versaprobe PHI 5000 from Physical Electronics, Chanhassen, MN, USA), equipped with a monochromatized X-ray source Al Kα). The XPS spectra were collected at a takeoff angle of 45 • with the electron energy analyzer, and the spot size was 200 µm. A passage energy of 20 eV was used for the high-energy resolution spectra recorded on the Co 2p, Cu 2p, O 1s, and C 1s core level energy range. The spectra were analyzed using the CASA-XPS software (Teignmouth, Devon, UK).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were performed using a Hitachi TM-3000 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (Tokyo, Japan) operated at 15 kV. The spatial resolution was 5 nm.
The Co-abietate and Cu-abietate samples, in powder form, were evaluated by colorimetry. The coordinates were determined by a portable colorimeter (model NR60CP, 3nh (Shenzhen, China)) with a D65 light source. The CIE 1976 L*a*b* colorimetric method was used. In this method, L* is the color lightness (L = 0 for black; and L = 100 for white), a* is the green (−)/red (+) axis, and b* is the blue (−)/yellow (+) axis, as recommended by the Commission Internationale de I'Eclairage (CIE) [27].
Thermal decomposition was analyzed on a Perkin Elmer thermal analyzer, STA 6000, in Simultaneous Differential Scanning Calorimetry (STA/TG-DSC) mode (from Pontyclun, Mid Glamorgan, UK). A heating rate of 10 • C/min was used, in the temperature range of 30 to 1000 • C, with the support of alumina samples, in a nitrogen atmosphere with an average flow rate of 40 mL·min −1 .

Antibacterial Test
The broth microdilution method measured the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) according to the adapted methodology from the Clinical Manual and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2006). Inoculums of E. coli (ATCC 25922) and S. aureus (ATCC ® . 25923) were cultivated at 35 • C for 18 h and diluted to obtain a density of 10 5 CFU mL −1 . Next, these extracts were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to reach a concentration range from 3.20 to 24.5 µg·mL −1 . A volume of 150 µL of Mueller Hinton broth containing the inoculum and 50 µL of different dilutions of pigments were added in each well. Microplates were incubated at 35 • C for 24 h. Bacterial growth was detected by adding 10 µL of sterile aqueous solution (20 mg·mL −1 ) of triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC, Inlab, Brazil) after incubation at 35 • C for 30 min. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is defined as the lowest concentration of the abietic complexes to inhibit bacterial growth, as indicated by a reduction in the red color of the TTC [28]. The experiments were performed in triplicate.

Antiviral Test
The antiviral tests were conducted using the RT-qPCR protocol of the national COVID-19 detection service in a procedure for viral inactivation detection. SARS-CoV-2 viruses were isolated into Hank's balanced salt solution from nasopharyngeal swabs of confirmed COVID-19 patients and stored at −80 • C until application. The samples were residuals from the initial COVID-19 testing platform at UMONS (University of Mons, Mons, Belgium) and came to the testing platform from all over the Hainault region of Belgium. The exposure phase of the antiviral test followed the ISO 21702:2019 guideline, while an RT-qPCR−based technique was used to quantify the surviving intact viral particles. Polyvinyl chloride specimens were made in a size of 25 mm × 25 mm for the test. The specimens were coated with acrylic coatings (as negative control), and the coatings containing Co-abietate and Cu-abietate were synthesized. Weathered copper plates were used as positive controls. The samples were placed in individual wells of a sterile 6-well plate in triplicate. Before the tests, the samples were sterilized by ultraviolet according to the standard procedure (15 min per side). A liquid volume of 100 µL in a virus concentration corresponding to a Ct value in RT-qPCR of approximately 22 was added to each surface. A 20 mm × 20 mm polyethylene film cover was placed on top of the liquid. The samples were inoculated with 100% relative humidity at 37 • C. After the incubation, intact viral particles were recovered in 200 µL of a viral recovery solution containing 5 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 40 mM dithiothreitol, 20 µg/mL glycogen, 1% Triton X-100, buffered with 25 mM sodium citrate to pH 8 was used. Using the manufacturers' extraction protocol, the viral RNA was extracted with AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman, MA, USA) SARS-CoV-2 viral suspensions were tested using the RT-PCR kit (Takyon One-Step Rox Probe 5x MasterMix dTTP, Eurogentec, Belgium). The Ct values, and the number of cycles necessary to spot the virus, were generated via the RT-PCR test as viral load indicators. The amplification reactions were performed using TaqMan RT-PCR on a StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher, USA). The primers used were SARS E_Sarbeco-F1 (ACAGGTACGTTAATAGT-TAATAGCGT) and SARS E_Sarbeco-R2 (ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA) with SARS E_Sarbeco-P1 (FAM-ACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGCGCTTCGBBQ) as a fluorescent probe for the E gene using the Eurogentec (Belgium) Mastermix containing ROX as the internal reference. The PCR conditions were as follows: the initial denaturation step, 48 • C for 10 min for reverse transcription, followed by 95 • C for 3 min, and then 45 cycles of 95 • C for 15 s, 58 • C for 30 s. The antiviral activity was performed in triplicate, and the results were expressed logarithmically. The antiviral activity was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test at a 5% level of significance.

Vibrational Spectroscopy (FTIR)
The FTIR was used to analyze the abietate complex's structure and the bonding mode. Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra for the Co-abietate, Cu-abietate complexes, and the Naabietate precursor. The characteristic bands obtained for FTIR of the metal-carboxylate interaction are represented by the strong asymmetric COO stretching vibration (υ as COO − ) and the symmetric COO stretching vibration (υ s COO − ) modes. The metal-carboxylate can coordinate in different ways, for instance, involving an ionic form, unidentate coordination, a bidentate chelating coordination, and a bidentate bridging coordination [29]. The wavenumber of the carboxylate bands varies according to the ligand and metallic core. The infrared spectra can access the binding mode of the carboxylate group by the difference in the wavenumbers of the symmetric and asymmetric modes, e.g., ∆υ = υ as COO − − υ s COO − . Analogously as shown by Deacon and Phillips [30], the ionic form (Na-abietate) can be used to determine the binding mode. This form is found in sodium or potassium salts. The carboxylate complex presents a ∆υ(COO − ) value different from the ionic form or carboxylate ion. The possible mode of coordination can be deduced by comparing the two forms. A general trend for band separation values, ∆υ, can be outlined as uncoordinated acid > unidentate coordination > bidentate bridging > chelating coordination > free car-Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1202 5 of 17 boxylate ion (the ionic form) [31]. Table 1 shows the typical bands of carboxylate ligands for the Co-abietate and Cu-abietate complexes, the Na-abietate ionic form, including the ∆υ(COO − ) values. As can be seen in Table 1, the ∆υ (COO − ) of the Co-abietate complex exceeds the value for the ionic form (Na-abietate). However, the value is not exceptionally high, indicating that the complex is bidentate. The Cu-abietate complex showed a higher ∆υ(COO − ) value, consistent with a unidentate coordination mode.
modes, e.g., Δυ = υasCOO − -υsCOO − . Analogously as shown by Deacon and Phillips [30], the ionic form (Na-abietate) can be used to determine the binding mode. This form is found in sodium or potassium salts. The carboxylate complex presents a Δυ(COO − ) value different from the ionic form or carboxylate ion. The possible mode of coordination can be deduced by comparing the two forms. A general trend for band separation values, Δυ, can be outlined as uncoordinated acid > unidentate coordination > bidentate bridging > chelating coordination > free carboxylate ion (the ionic form) [31]. Table 1 shows the typical bands of carboxylate ligands for the Co-abietate and Cu-abietate complexes, the Na-abietate ionic form, including the Δυ(COO − ) values. As can be seen in Table 1, the Δυ (COO − ) of the Co-abietate complex exceeds the value for the ionic form (Na-abietate). However, the value is not exceptionally high, indicating that the complex is bidentate. The Cu-abietate complex showed a higher Δυ(COO − ) value, consistent with a unidentate coordination mode.

Mass Spectrometry (MS)
Mass spectrometry is used to investigate the structure of the compounds. The mass spectra (MS) for Co and Cu-abietate were obtained from a solution of dichloromethane (DCM) diluted in methanol injected into an ion trap spectrometer (MS-MS) with low resolution in the negative and positive ion mode and electrospray ionization. Figure 2 shows the mass spectra of the Co-abietate sample and the respective structures corresponding to the m/z peaks in the negative ion mode. The prominent peak at m/z 301

Mass Spectrometry (MS)
Mass spectrometry is used to investigate the structure of the compounds. The mass spectra (MS) for Co and Cu-abietate were obtained from a solution of dichloromethane (DCM) diluted in methanol injected into an ion trap spectrometer (MS-MS) with low resolution in the negative and positive ion mode and electrospray ionization. Figure 2 shows the mass spectra of the Co-abietate sample and the respective structures corresponding to the m/z peaks in the negative ion mode. The prominent peak at m/z 301 corresponds to the theoretical molecular mass of deprotonated abietic acid [C 20 H 29 O 2 ]. The peak at m/z 649 corresponds to forming a dimeric form of the abietic acid, but with three additional oxygen atoms corresponding to the oxidation of three C=C bonds to its keto form. Figure 2B shows these consecutive oxidations resulting in a difference of m/z 16 between them: m/z − 617; m/z − 633; m/z − 649. The peak of m/z − 1008 ( Figure 2A between them: m/z − 617; m/z − 633; m/z − 649. The peak of m/z − 1008 ( Figure 2A corresponds to the formation of Co-abietate with three abietate ligands [Co(C20H29O2)3] also with m/z equivalent to the complex with three additional oxygen atoms; these oxidations of the ligands are identified by m/z differences of 16 units between peaks ( Figure 2C). The highest m/z peak at m/z − 1270 ( Figure 2A) corresponds to the formation of the Co-abietate complex with four abietate ligands [Co(C20H29O2)4].  The Cu-abietate sample shows m/z peaks with similar distribution to Co-abietate ones, suggesting a single metallic nucleus bond to four abietate ligands. This structure can be observed by the mass spectrum of the Cu-abietate compound ( Figure 3A Figure 3B shows the successive oxidations of C=C bonds, evidenced by the m/z difference of 16 units between the peaks. Compared to Co-abietate, the copper complex shows less unsaturation due to the different oxidative or reducing character of these transition metals. The Cu-abietate sample shows m/z peaks with similar distribution to Co-abietate ones, suggesting a single metallic nucleus bond to four abietate ligands. This structure can be observed by the mass spectrum of the Cu-abietate compound ( Figure 3A), in which four peaks are denoted: m/z − 301, m/z − 603, m/z − 966, and m/z − 1273, corresponding to the molecular mass of deprotonated abietic acid (C20H29O2) − ; to the dimeric form of abietic acid; the molecular mass of copper bound to three abietate ligands [Cu(C20H29O2)3] − ; and to the Cu-abietate complex constituted by four ligands (C20H29O2) − , respectively. Figure 3B shows the successive oxidations of C=C bonds, evidenced by the m/z difference of 16 units between the peaks. Compared to Co-abietate, the copper complex shows less unsaturation due to the different oxidative or reducing character of these transition metals.

NEXAFS
The Na K-edge ( Figure 4A) spectrum of the Na-abietate precursor presents three main features: the shoulder observed at 1076.9 eV is assigned to the 1s → 3p transition [32], a peak at 1079.4 eV whose origin is not well established, and, a pre-edge structure observed in the spectrum at 1074.6 eV that corresponds to the transition 1s → 3s [33]. This transition is parity forbidden in a free sodium ion. Therefore, it will not be observed in a NEXAFS spectrum of atomic sodium [32], indicating that the sodium atoms in the Naabietate are in ionic form, as expected for this sample.

NEXAFS
The Na K-edge ( Figure 4A) spectrum of the Na-abietate precursor presents three main features: the shoulder observed at 1076.9 eV is assigned to the 1s→3p transition [32], a peak at 1079.4 eV whose origin is not well established, and, a pre-edge structure observed in the spectrum at 1074.6 eV that corresponds to the transition 1s→3s [33]. This transition is parity forbidden in a free sodium ion. Therefore, it will not be observed in a NEXAFS spectrum of atomic sodium [32], indicating that the sodium atoms in the Na-abietate are in ionic form, as expected for this sample. The X-ray absorption (NEXAFS) measurements at Co L-edge and Cu L-edge were performed to determine the electronic structure of the metals in Co-abietate and Cuabietate samples. Figure 4B shows the absorption spectra of cobalt atoms in the Coabietate sample. The NEXAFS spectrum results from the 2p → 3d dipole transitions. The Co LIII absorption lines exhibit peaks centered at 777.1, 778.6, and 779.5 eV and the Co LII at 774.0 eV. These are characteristic of the Co 2+ oxidation state [34][35][36][37].
The Cu 2p NEXAFS spectrum ( Figure 4C) from the Cu-abietate shows the dipole transition of the Cu 2p3/2 (LIII) and 2p1/2 (LII) electrons into the empty d-states [38]. The intense absorption band at 931.1 eV is characteristic of the Cu 2+ oxidation state. In contrast, the low-intensity peak at a photon energy of 933.7 eV is related to the presence of Cu + in a smaller proportion [39]. The energy separation between LIII and LII features, which is determined by the spin coupling, is dependent on the oxidation state of Cu. It is 19.0 eV for Cu 2+ and 21.0 eV for Cu + [38]. However, for Cu-abietate in Figure 4C, the separation between LIII and LII is 20 eV and 18 eV for Cu 2+ and Cu + , respectively. This difference occurred because the oxidation states mixture resulted in a peak (at 951 eV) displacement in the LII edge. It should be noted that Cu 2+ ions were used in the Cu-abietate synthesis process, and the presence of Cu + indicates a change in the electronic structure of the metal, i.e., the abietate ligand contributed to the reduction of a small portion of the copper ions used in the synthesis.

XPS
The composition of Co-abietate and Cu-abietate was evaluated by X-ray photoelectron (XPS). The spectra were analyzed using the CASA XPS software, and the binding energies were calibrated using the carbon C 1s peak at 284.6 eV. The XPS survey was used to determine the elemental analysis of the abietates complexes. For Co-abietate the presence of C, O, Na, S, and Co was identified, and for Cu-abietate the presence of C, O, Na, and Cu, as shown in Figure 5. The X-ray absorption (NEXAFS) measurements at Co L-edge and Cu L-edge were performed to determine the electronic structure of the metals in Co-abietate and Cu-abietate samples. Figure 4B shows the absorption spectra of cobalt atoms in the Co-abietate sample. The NEXAFS spectrum results from the 2p→3d dipole transitions. The Co LIII absorption lines exhibit peaks centered at 777.1, 778.6, and 779.5 eV and the Co LII at 774.0 eV. These are characteristic of the Co 2+ oxidation state [34][35][36][37].
The Cu 2p NEXAFS spectrum ( Figure 4C) from the Cu-abietate shows the dipole transition of the Cu 2p3/2 (LIII) and 2p1/2 (LII) electrons into the empty d-states [38]. The intense absorption band at 931.1 eV is characteristic of the Cu 2+ oxidation state. In contrast, the low-intensity peak at a photon energy of 933.7 eV is related to the presence of Cu + in a smaller proportion [39]. The energy separation between LIII and LII features, which is determined by the spin coupling, is dependent on the oxidation state of Cu. It is 19.0 eV for Cu 2+ and 21.0 eV for Cu + [38]. However, for Cu-abietate in Figure 4C, the separation between LIII and LII is 20 eV and 18 eV for Cu 2+ and Cu + , respectively. This difference occurred because the oxidation states mixture resulted in a peak (at 951 eV) displacement in the LII edge. It should be noted that Cu 2+ ions were used in the Cu-abietate synthesis process, and the presence of Cu + indicates a change in the electronic structure of the metal, i.e., the abietate ligand contributed to the reduction of a small portion of the copper ions used in the synthesis.

XPS
The composition of Co-abietate and Cu-abietate was evaluated by X-ray photoelectron (XPS). The spectra were analyzed using the CASA XPS software, and the binding energies were calibrated using the carbon C 1s peak at 284.6 eV. The XPS survey was used to determine the elemental analysis of the abietates complexes. For Co-abietate the presence of C, O, Na, S, and Co was identified, and for Cu-abietate the presence of C, O, Na, and Cu, as shown in Figure 5.
The spectrum of O 1s for the Co-abietate can be reproduced using three components (Gaussians-Lorentzian) centered at 531.   [43,44]. All the components denoted in C 1s and O 1s spectra confirm the carboxylate groups presence in the abietates complexes structure, as evidenced in infrared data (FTIR).

Morphological (SEM) Characteristics
The morphology of the abietates complexes was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figure 6 shows the SEM image of the Co-abietate and Cu-abietate samples. It is observed that the morphology is dependent on the metal core. The Co-abietate morphology is composed of irregular clusters of particles, such as lumps with an ellipsoid to spherical form with an average size of 100 nm ( Figure 6C). The surface is homogeneous and rough. There are small vacancies between the particles that tend to prevent the proliferation of bacteria on the surface, as suggested in previous reports [45]. On the other hand, the Cu-abietate morphology shows large rod−shaped pores with slightly non−uniformity, and the surface is rougher than in Co-abietate images. Cu-abietate also showed a smaller particle size than Co-abietate, as shown in Figure 6D. These results indicate that the metal influences the morphology of the complexes. oxygen (C=O), and carboxylate group (O−C=O), at 284.3, 285.4, 288.0 eV, respectively. In Cu-abietate, four components at 284.3; 285.8; 287.6; 289.9 eV, assigned to the same characteristic peaks attributed in Co-abietate C1s spectrum: C−H/C−C, C=C, C−O/C=O, and O-C=O bonds, respectively [43,44]. All the components denoted in C 1s and O 1s spectra confirm the carboxylate groups presence in the abietates complexes structure, as evidenced in infrared data (FTIR).

Morphological (SEM) Characteristics
The morphology of the abietates complexes was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figure 6 shows the SEM image of the Co-abietate and Cu-abietate samples. It is observed that the morphology is dependent on the metal core. The Coabietate morphology is composed of irregular clusters of particles, such as lumps with an ellipsoid to spherical form with an average size of 100 nm ( Figure 6C). The surface is homogeneous and rough. There are small vacancies between the particles that tend to prevent the proliferation of bacteria on the surface, as suggested in previous reports [45]. On the other hand, the Cu-abietate morphology shows large rod−shaped pores with slightly non−uniformity, and the surface is rougher than in Co-abietate images. Cuabietate also showed a smaller particle size than Co-abietate, as shown in Figure 6D. These results indicate that the metal influences the morphology of the complexes.  Figure 7 shows the images of specimens painted with the pigments dispersed in paint ( Figure 7A,B), the pigments in powder form ( Figure 7C,D), and the colorimetric coordinates of the complexes according to the norm of the International Commission d'Eclairage (CIE) of 1976, which relates the hue and saturation of the materials ( Figure 7E). The results obtained through colorimetric coordinates were L* = 73.5; a* = +5.83; b* = −5.31 for Coabietate, and L* = 76.8; a* = −21.8; b* = −1.93, for Cu-abietate. Co-abietate showed a negative b* value tending to blue, and when combined, the a* coordinate explained the purple color of the powder material. Cu-abietate showed a negative a* value, tending to a green color. These results accord for green materials as expected. Different colors can be observed between the samples according to the chromaticity values, indicating that the metallic core is the main responsible for the color of the complexes. Therefore, different colors can be obtained for their application as synthetic pigments. d'Eclairage (CIE) of 1976, which relates the hue and saturation of the materials ( Figure  7E). The results obtained through colorimetric coordinates were L* = 73.5; a* = +5.83; b* = −5.31 for Co-abietate, and L* = 76.8; a* = −21.8; b* = −1.93, for Cu-abietate. Co-abietate showed a negative b* value tending to blue, and when combined, the a* coordinate explained the purple color of the powder material. Cu-abietate showed a negative a* value, tending to a green color. These results accord for green materials as expected. Different colors can be observed between the samples according to the chromaticity values, indicating that the metallic core is the main responsible for the color of the complexes. Therefore, different colors can be obtained for their application as synthetic pigments.

TG-DTG
Thermogravimetric analysis was undertaken to evaluate the thermal stability of the pigments in the temperature range of 25 to 1000 °C. Figure 8 shows the thermogravimetric (TG/DTG) curves for the Co-abietate and Cu-abietate complexes. The thermal decomposition processes were different for each compound.

TG-DTG
Thermogravimetric analysis was undertaken to evaluate the thermal stability of the pigments in the temperature range of 25 to 1000 • C. Figure 8 shows the thermogravimetric (TG/DTG) curves for the Co-abietate and Cu-abietate complexes. The thermal decomposition processes were different for each compound. The thermal analysis of the Co-abietate, presented in Figure 8A, shows four stages of mass loss. The first stage occurs at 80-124 °C with a mass loss of 3.1% (m/m) attributed to the loss of water molecules. The second step was observed at 190-280°C with 14% (m/m) of organic ligand loss. The third and foremost stage is observed in an interval of 330-490 °C with 45% (m/m) of mass loss also from the organic ligand loss, and the last step at 710-820 °C occurs with 9% (m/m) of weight loss due to the decomposition of the COO − a group from the abietate ligands. The mass loss and derivate curves for Cu-abietate ( Figure 8B) show that, when compared to the Co-abietate, Cu-abietate has more events, with a total of five stages: the dehydration event occurs from room temperature up to 103 °C, indicating the loss of 1.2% (m/m), the second is found at 182-363 °C with 49.1% (m/m) due to ligand decomposition, the third at 182 °C with 1.6% (m/m) loss related to the abietate The thermal analysis of the Co-abietate, presented in Figure 8A, shows four stages of mass loss. The first stage occurs at 80-124 • C with a mass loss of 3.1% (m/m) attributed to the loss of water molecules. The second step was observed at 190-280 • C with 14% (m/m) of organic ligand loss. The third and foremost stage is observed in an interval of 330-490 • C with 45% (m/m) of mass loss also from the organic ligand loss, and the last step at 710-820 • C occurs with 9% (m/m) of weight loss due to the decomposition of the COO − a group from the abietate ligands. The mass loss and derivate curves for Cu-abietate ( Figure 8B) show that, when compared to the Co-abietate, Cu-abietate has more events, with a total of five stages: the dehydration event occurs from room temperature up to 103 • C, indicating the loss of 1.2% (m/m), the second is found at 182-363 • C with 49.1% (m/m) due to ligand decomposition, the third at 182 • C with 1.6% (m/m) loss related to the abietate decomposition, the fourth occurs at between 363-503 • C with 14.4 % (m/m) of variation to the ligand decomposition, and the last stage involves 5.6% of mass loss between 503-670 • C, corresponding to the decomposition of the COO − group from the abietate ligands.
Zhou et al. [46] reported on the decomposition of pine resin + metal compounds showing two prominent stages within the 30-800 • C. In the first, the weight loss below 300 • C was associate with the degradation of the resin. During the second stage, the weight loss was related to the fracture of COO-Metal-OOC bonds. This second step, described by these authors, shows the metals' influence on the degradation of the complexes from pine resin. The differences in the stages were associated with the different coordination modes, as shown by mass spectrometry and FTIR analysis. According to these authors, the results discussed here suggest that the differences in thermogravimetric (TG/DTG) curves between the complex samples are related to the complexation of the metal in the coordination compounds and the different labilities between the metals. Furthermore, the thermal analysis showed differences between the complexes, even with the same ligand for all the samples. These differences may be due to structural differences between the Co and Cu complexes.

Antibacterial Activity
Co-abietate and Cu-abietate were tested against the Gram−positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus and the Gram−negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Both complexes in DMSO exhibited positive results for S. aureus and E. coli, with MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) values of 4.50 µg·mL −1 , and the concentration range tested was 3.20 to 24.5 µg·mL −1 . These results are similar to those found in the previous works, as shown in Table 2, and better than those found in Solanki et al. [47], which describes the carboxylates and pyrazole containing mixed ligand copper(II) and cobalt(II) complexes synthesis, which had MIC activity of 200 µg·mL −1 against S. aureus, and E.coli. Reports on the antimicrobial activities of Pinus resin [48,49], demonstrated that the Pinus resin is insoluble in water, and the pigments (Cu-abietate and Co-abietate) show hydrophobic properties. Hydrophobic coatings can inhibit bacterial growth because they have strong adhesion resistance, which prevents direct contact with the bacteria on the surface [50]. Another explanation for the observed antibacterial properties is the presence of metals (Co and Cu) in synthesizing the pigments that can form reactive oxygen species that inhibit bacterial growth [51]. However, for carboxylates ligands, the antimicrobial effect is likely due to the lipophilic character favoring the interaction with the bacterial cell wall, breaching it, and causing the bacteria's death [52,53]. An advantage of using metal compounds is that their lifespan is longer than chemical disinfectants because they are not consumed in the inhibition process.

Antiviral Activity
To verify the inhibitory effect of Cu-abietate and Co-abietate against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the specimens were evaluated using an adaptation of the ISO 21702:2019 guideline for the exposure phase. The remaining intact virus was quantified using an RT-qPCR protocol. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in environmental samples (Table 3) is used to indicate that virus (viable or nonviable) was present on that surface at some point previously, indicating a viable virus [58]. In the specimens containing Co-abietate and Cu-abietate, the percentage of viral load reduction after 24 h was 99.996% for both samples. These show that pigments at 10% (W/W) concentrations in commercial paint present an optimal virucidal activity (SARS-CoV-2). Exposure to the acrylic coating (paint matrix) alone resulted in a 1.5 log viral load reduction. Still, the coatings containing Co-abietate and Cu-abietate resulted in a 2.5 log further reduction, proving the efficiency of Co-abietate and Cu-abietate as antiviral pigments. The metal complexes have been reported as potential inhibitors of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which in addition to playing a role in the host cell entry, might function as a potential modulator of host immunity to delay or attenuate the immune response against the viruses [58]. This virus belongs to a large family of enveloped viruses with +ssRNA and crown−like spikes on their spherical surfaces [3]. The damage to the protein and envelope of the SARS-CoV-2's spike destroys the external structure of the virus and thereby inhibits the mechanism by which it infects [20]. Many studies have related that transition metals, such as cobalt and copper, combined with natural diterpenes, such as abietic and dehydroabietic acids (DHAA) from Pinus resin, can form efficient complexes to kill viruses. Natural resin is a traditional product of Chinese medicine; its derivatives have a wide range of biological activities [59].

Discussion on Advantages and Constraints of the Novel Synthesis Process
The use of renewable raw materials to obtain the binder of the complexes contributes to the reduction in production costs and the use of an environmentally friendly product. Furthermore, the proposed synthesis route proved effective at mild temperatures and without organic solvents, which are the main advantages of the proposed green synthesis process. In contrast, the presence of complexes with three and four ligands was identified as shown in mass spectrometry (MS), which could be a possible limitation of the reproducibility of the process since it is not possible to fine-control the formation of a single structure-besides the presence of more than one oxidation state of the metals, indicated by the NEXAFS technique. However, when applied in the coating, the complexes showed good opacity and coating, and the curing process of the coating was not altered. Thus, the complexes have a high potential for application as pigments for architectural paints. In addition, the antibacterial and antiviral properties of the complexes were satisfactory, not requiring antimicrobial additives, leading to a reduction in the cost of the final product.

Conclusions
We described a novel synthesis route that is low−cost, more straightforward, and environmentally friendly compared to reported ones to obtain similar pigments. The cobalt and copper ions strongly interacted with the ligand, forming stables compounds with a +2 oxidation state in both complexes. It was found that these complexes interact with the carboxylate group in the ligand. These structures were confirmed by elemental analysis, XPS, FTIR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. The colorimetric analysis indicated that parameters a* and b* combine purple and green−blue colors for Co-abietate and Cu-abietate, respectively. Both complexes show good thermal stability. The antibacterial test for both complexes showed satisfactory minimum inhibitory concentration (4.50 µg·mL −1 ) against S. aureus and E. coli. In addition, the samples showed promising results against SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the synthesized pigments are promising materials to reduce infection proliferation from contact with contaminated surfaces, thus limiting the SARS-CoV-2 spread. Further studies on the toxicity of the pigments will be performed.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.