Next Article in Journal
Unique Interaction between Layered Black Phosphorus and Nitrogen Dioxide
Next Article in Special Issue
Ligand Engineering Triggered Efficiency Tunable Emission in Zero-Dimensional Manganese Hybrids for White Light-Emitting Diodes
Previous Article in Journal
Polypyrrole Modified MoS2 Nanorod Composites as Durable Pseudocapacitive Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Versatile Gold Telluride Iodide Monolayer as a Potential Photocatalyst for Water Splitting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Substrate-Modulated Electric and Magnetic Resonances of Lithium Niobite Nanoparticles Illuminated by White Light

Institute of Ultrafast Optical Physics, Department of Applied Physics & MIIT Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Microstructure and Quantum Sensing, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(12), 2010; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122010
Submission received: 8 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Properties of Semiconductor Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
The manipulation of light at the nanoscale is important for nanophotonic research. Lithium niobite (LiNbO3), as an ideal building block for metamaterials, has attracted great interest for its unique properties in the field of nonlinear optics. In this paper, we numerically studied the effect of different substrates on the optical resonances of a LiNbO3 nanoparticle. The results show that the electric and magnetic resonances of such a system can be effectively adjusted by changing the substrate. Compared to the impact of dielectric substrate, the interaction between the LiNbO3 nanoparticle and the Au film shows a fascinating phenomenon that a sharp resonance peak appears. The multipole decomposition of the scattering spectrum shows that the size, shape of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle, and the thickness of the SiO2 film between the particle and the Au film have a significant impact on the electromagnetic resonance of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle. This work provides a new insight into LiNbO3 nanoparticles, which may have potential use in the design of dielectric nanomaterials and devices.

1. Introduction

The study of light scattering of subwavelength particles can be traced back to 100 years ago when the Mie theory was provided and widely used to describe the optical resonance of spherical particles [1]. The electric and magnetic resonances of subwavelength particles have attracted tremendous interest as viable potential alternatives to nanophotonic devices.
Metal nanoparticles, for example, can support surface plasmons, which can be used to concentrate light into subwavelength volumes and produce higher optical intensity [2,3,4,5,6], thus paving the way to break the diffraction limit down to the nanometer scale. These extraordinary properties can trigger numerous fascinating optical phenomena such as superlensing effects [7,8] and surface-enhanced Raman scattering [9,10]. However, the majority of these undergo Ohmic loss and lack of magnetic resonance, which inevitably limit their application. By comparison with metal nanoparticles, dielectric nanoparticles possess lower dissipative loss for the small imaginary part of the refractive index. It was not until 2011 that dielectric nanoparticles with significant electromagnetic response in the visible and infrared wavebands were theoretically studied [11]. Dielectric nanoparticles with a high refractive index above 3.0, such as silicon (Si) [12,13,14], germanium (Ge) [15,16], and gallium arsenide (GaAs) [17], exhibit well-separated electric and magnetic dipole (ED and MD) resonances in the scattering spectra. It has been demonstrated that ED and MD resonances can be effectively controlled by adjusting the particle geometry and dielectric environment [18,19]. The circular displacement currents excited by the incident light lead to the oscillating dipole, termed as MD resonance. MD resonance occurs when the wavelength of the incident light (λ) and the diameter (D) of the particle have the relationship of λ = nD, where n is the refractive index of the particles. These nanoparticles can be utilized as building blocks for nanoantenna in the visible range. In contrast to the high refractive index nanoparticles, the nanoparticles with a refractive index around 1.7–3 also support ED and MD resonances [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In this case, the spectra of the ED and MD resonances tend to largely overlap with each other, which enables forward scattering to occur at the peak of total scattering spectra.
Unlike ideal studies of the scattering spectra in a free space, nanoparticles always need to be supported by various substrates that, in general, modify their ED and MD resonances. Thus, another degree of freedom for manipulating their optical properties is provided. So far, systematic studies of the interaction between nanoparticles and substrates have been carried out [2,3,4,5,22,27,28,29,30]. It has been theoretically and experimentally demonstrated that the dielectric substrates have a slight influence on the ED and MD resonances [30]. In contrast, the localized plasmon resonance of metallic nanoparticles and substrate is sensitive to the shape and size of the nanoparticle and the surrounding environment [4,27]. An interesting case is high refractive index dielectric nanoparticles placed on metallic substrate. The strong coupling effects lead to a significant enhancement in the electromagnetic field [29,30,31].
LiNbO3, as an important nonlinear material, has high second-order susceptibility coefficients, which can be widely used in electro-optical modulator [32,33,34,35] and phase modulator [36,37,38,39] devices, and in acoustic filters [40,41]. However, little attentions has been paid to the scattering properties of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle.
In this study, we calculate multipole decomposition of the scattering spectra of a LiNbO3 nanoparticle placed on different substrates by using a finite-different time-domain (FDTD) technique. Compared to a LiNbO3 nanoparticle supported on dielectric substrates, a sharp resonance mode appears, which is caused by the interaction of the LiNbO3 particle and the Au film. Furthermore, the evolution of the scattering spectra of LiNbO3 nanoparticles with different diameters is studied. It is demonstrated that the thickness of SiO2 film between the LiNbO3 nanoparticle and the Au film has an impact on the scattering spectra. Furthermore, the results show that the shape also has a great influence on the scattering mode.

2. Theoretical Analysis

The scattering spectra of the LiNbO3 nanoparticles in this work are calculated using the FDTD technique. Firstly, we calculate the background field without the presence of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle. The total scattering spectra of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle is then derived. Finally, the scattering spectra is obtained from the difference between the total scattering spectra and the background field.
To analyze the electric and magnetic resonances of the LiNbO3 nanoparticles placed on different substrates, we employ the multipole decomposition of polarization P = ε 0 ε P ε d E , in the Cartesian coordinate, where ε 0 , ε p , and ε d represent the vacuum dielectric constant, relative dielectric permittivity of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle, and relative dielectric permittivity of the surrounding medium, respectively. E is the total electric field inside the LiNbO3 nanoparticle. The multipole moment can be obtained by integration of the induced polarization currents over the volume of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle. As a result, the ED moment, electric quadrupole (EQ) moment, MD moment, and magnetic quadrupole (MQ) moment can be expressed as:
ED = P r d r
EQ = 3 r P r + P r r 2 3 r · P r U ^ d r
MD = i ω 2 r × P r d r
MQ = ω 3 i r × P r r r r × P r d r
where ω is the angular frequency of the incident light, r describes the radius vector of a volume element inside the LiNbO3 nanoparticles, and U ^ is a 3 × 3 unit tensor. The scattering cross sections of the ED, EQ, MD, and MQ can be expressed as:
σ E D = k 0 4 12 π ε 0 2 v d μ 0 ED 2
σ E Q = k 0 6 ε d 1440 π ε 0 2 v d μ 0 α β EQ α β 2
σ M D = k 0 4 ε d 12 π ε 0 v d MD 2
σ M Q = k 0 6 ε d 2 160 π ε 0 v d α β MQ α β 2
Here, k0, vd, and μ 0 denote the wave number in vacuum, the speed of light in the surrounding medium, and the vacuum permeability, respectively. The subscript characters α and β represent x, y, z. The total scattering intensity (Psc) can be obtained by the superposition of the scattering cross sections of multipole moments. Note that the poles that are of a higher order than the quadrupole make less contributions to the scattering intensity [20,42]; here we include the contributions from ED, EQ, MD, and MQ, which can be expressed as:
P s c σ E D + σ M D + σ E Q + σ M Q
The dielectric constants of LiNbO3, SiO2, and Au are respectively taken from Zelmon [43], Gao [44], and Rakić [45], while we assume that the refractive index of the glass substrate is equal to 1.5.

3. Results

In Figure 1, we present the total scattering spectra, as well as the contributions from multipole resonances calculated for a LiNbO3 nanoparticle located on top of the glass substrate, LiNbO3 substrate, and 50 nm Au film/glass substrate. A uniform environment with a refractive index of 1.0 is employed. The first row of Figure 1 shows the schematic of LiNbO3 nanoparticles with diameter D = 300 nm placed on different substrates. With the light incidents along the z axis and the polarization direction along the y axis, the corresponding multipole decomposition of the scattering spectra is calculated by using the FDTD simulation with respect to the center of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle, as shown in the second row of Figure 1. These results clearly demonstrate that ED resonance of LiNbO3 nanoparticles largely overlaps with that of MD resonance. Different from the conventional Si and GaAs nanoparticles, the EQ and MQ resonances of LiNbO3 nanoparticle also make a prominent contribution to scattering spectra, except for the ED and MD resonances. Note that with the increasing of the refractive index of the substrate, the ED resonance is enhanced while MD resonance is weakened, as shown in Figure 1d,e. More importantly, a significantly reduced linewidth is found for the LiNbO3 nanoparticles positioned on Au film (Figure 1f) compared to that on dielectric substrates (Figure 1d,e). The corresponding electric field distributions on the yz plane are depicted in Figure 2. It is clear to see that the peak of the scattering spectra is obvious for the Au film substrate (Figure 1f). On the contrary, the peaks of the other cases are not so pronounced (Figure 1d,e); here we show the electric field distribution at the peak of the ED. As shown in Figure 2c, a hotspot is generated between the nanoparticle and the Au film. Generally, for the LiNbO3 nanoparticle-metal film system, the hotspot is attributed to the interaction of the original ED and MD resonances of the nanoparticle and their mirror images aroused by Au film. According to the mirror image theory [31,33], the original ED mode induced by incident light leads to an antiparallel mirror ED mode inside the Au film, while the original MD mode results in a mirror MD mode inside the Au film. Due to the coherent interaction of the ED and MD resonances and their mirror images, the ultimate ED resonance of the LiNbO3 particle/Au film system is enhanced while the MD resonance is decreased. The far-field radiation pattern in the xy plane is depicted in Figure 3. It is remarkable that the strong power distribution is along the y direction, which indicates the existence of the dipole oscillating along the y direction.
To corroborate this mechanism for the LiNbO3 nanoparticle on the Au film/glass system, we calculated the total scattering spectra, as well as the multipole decompositions of a LiNbO3 nanoparticle with different diameters. Figure 4a–f show the calculated spectra for a LiNbO3 nanoparticle with diameter D = 240 nm, 260 nm, 280 nm, 300 nm, 320 nm, and 340 nm, respectively. We can clearly see that the scattering spectra redshifts slightly and becomes wider when the diameter of the nanoparticle increases. At the same time, the ED resonance is strengthened while the MD resonance is weakened. An impressive phenomenon is that the quadrupolar resonances is enhanced, which may be caused by the symmetry breaking aroused by the presence of the Au film.
In Figure 5a, we calculate the scattering spectra for a LiNbO3 nanoparticle of diameter D = 300 nm located on a SiO2 film/Au film/glass substrate with an increasing thickness (g) of the SiO2 film. Note that, with the increasing of g, the scattering spectra has a redshift and becomes stronger. The electric field distribution in the yz plane for g = 10 nm at 670 nm, g = 30 nm at 690 nm, and g = 50 nm at 705 nm are depicted in Figure 5b–d, respectively. It is clear to see that the intensity of the hotspot decreases as the thickness of SiO2 increases.
Furthermore, we studied the influence of the shape of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle on the scattering spectra by considering the LiNbO3 nanoparticle with its long axis (Z) perpendicular to the Au film. As shown in Figure 6, the two main peaks of the scattering spectra exhibit redshift with the increase of Z. In particular, for all the values of Z in consideration, the coupled dipole resonance slowly damps out as the quadrupole resonance is strongly enhanced.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the influence of substrate on the scattering spectra of a LiNbO3 nanoparticle by using the FDTD technique. With the increase of the refractive index of the dielectric substrate, the ED resonance is enhanced and MD resonance is weakened. In contrast, the coupling of a LiNbO3 nanoparticle to an underlying Au film results in a sharper resonance. It is demonstrated that SiO2 film between the LiNbO3 particle and the Au film has a significant influence on the scattering spectra. Moreover, the shape of the LiNbO3 nanoparticle also affects the scattering spectra. In general, this work demonstrates that the different scattering properties can be obtained by adjusting the structure of the substrate and the nanoparticle. The results presented here broaden the study of moderate-refractive-index dielectric-metal hybrid systems, which may advance the application of LiNbO3 nanoparticles in lab-on-chip photonic devices and sensitive biosensors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L., Y.P. and R.L.; formal analysis, H.L., Y.P. and R.L.; investigation, H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.P. and R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62105154 and 11904028), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20210324), Jiangsu Provincial Double-Innovation Doctor Program (Grant No. JSSCBS20210218), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M691601), and the Foundation of the key laboratory of computational physics (Grant No. 6142A05200303).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kerker, M. The Scattering of Light, and Other Electromagnetic Radiation; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1969; pp. 27–96. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lei, D.Y.; Fernández-Domínguez, A.I.; Sonnefraud, Y.; Appavoo, K.; Haglund, R.F., Jr.; Pendry, J.B.; Maier, S.A. Revealing plasmonic gap modes in particle-on-film systems using dark-field spectroscopy. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, J.; Xiang, J.; Jiang, S.; Dai, Q.; Tie, S.; Lan, S. Multipole radiations from large gold nanospheres excited by evanescent wave. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sobhani, A.; Manjavacas, A.; Cao, Y.; McClain, M.J.; García de Abajo, F.J.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N.J. Pronounced linewidth narrowing of an aluminum nanoparticle plasmon resonance by interaction with an aluminum metallic film. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6946–6951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, G.C.; Zhang, Y.L.; Jiang, J.; Luo, Y.; Lei, D.Y. Metal-substrate-mediated plasmon hybridization in a nanoparticle dimer for photoluminescence line-width shrinking and intensity enhancement. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3067–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.; Xiang, J.; Jiang, S.; Dai, Q.F.; Tie, S.L.; Lan, S. Radiation of the high-order plasmonic modes of large gold nanospheres excited by surface plasmon polaritons. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 9153–9163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pendry, J.B. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 3966–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fang, N.; Lee, H.; Sun, C.; Zhang, X. Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens. Science 2005, 308, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kneipp, K.; Kneipp, H.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R.R.; Feld, M. Ultrasensitive chemical analysis by raman spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2957–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Ye, X.; Lin, H. Revealing the quadrupole radiation of liquid Gallium nanospheres. Appl. Phys. Express 2022, 15, 022006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garcia-Etxarri, A.; Gomez-Medina, R.; Froufe-Perez, L.S.; Lopez, C.; Chantada, L.; Scheffold, F.; Aizpurua, J.; Nieto-Vesperinas, M.; Saenz, J.J. Strong magnetic response of submicron silicon particles in the infrared. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 4815–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kuznetsov, A.I.; Miroshnichenko, A.E.; Fu, Y.H.; Zhang, J.; Luk’Yanchuk, B. Magnetic light. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Feng, T.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Miroshnichenko, A.E. Ideal magnetic dipole scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 173901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Xiang, J.; Li, H.; Li, J.X.; Dai, Q.; Lan, S.; Miroshnichenko, A.E. Lighting up silicon nanoparticles with Mie resonances. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ma, C.; Yan, J.; Huang, Y.; Yang, G. Directional scattering in a germanium nanosphere in the visible light region. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1700761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishii, S.; Chen, K.; Okuyama, H.; Nagao, T. Resonant optical absorption and photothermal process in high refractive index germanium nanoparticles. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1600902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiang, J.; Jiang, S.; Chen, J.; Li, J.; Dai, Q.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.; Tie, S.; Lan, S. Hot-electron intraband luminescence from GaAs nanospheres mediated by magnetic dipole resonances. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 4853–4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Van de Groep, J.; Polman, A. Designing dielectric resonators on substrates: Combining magnetic and electric resonances. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 26285–26302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van de Haar, M.A.; van de Groep, J.; Brenny, B.J.M.; Polman, A. Controlling magnetic and electric dipole modes in hollow silicon nanocylinders. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 2047–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Chen, B.; Wei, Y.; Liu, W.; Xu, Y.; Lan, S.; Liu, J. Ultraviolet second harmonic generation from Mie-resonant lithium niobate nanospheres. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 4273–4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Timpu, F.; Sergeyev, A.; Hendricks, N.R.; Grange, R. Second-harmonic enhancement with Mie resonances in perovskite nanoparticles. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, N.; Wang, H.; Lai, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, J. Substrate-modulated electromagnetic resonances in colloidal Cu2O nanospheres. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2020, 37, 2000106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ullah, K.; Habib, M.; Huang, L.; Garcia-Camara, B. Analysis of the substrate effect on the zero-backward scattering condition of a Cu2O nanoparticle under non-normal illumination. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhuo, X.; Cheng, X.; Guo, Y.; Jia, H.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J. Chemically synthesized electromagnetic metal oxide nanoresonators. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Wu, Y.; Vallée, R.A.; Wu, S.; Liu, X. Resonant scattering manipulation of dielectric nanoparticles. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, S.; Jiang, R.; Xie, Y.M.; Ruan, Q.; Yang, B.; Wang, J.; Lin, H.Q. Colloidal moderate-refractive-index Cu2O nanospheres as visible-region nanoantennas with electromagnetic resonance and directional light-scattering properties. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7432–7439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Miroshnichenko, A.E.; Evlyukhin, A.B.; Kivshar, Y.S.; Chichkov, B.N. Substrate-induced resonant magnetoelectric effects for dielectric nanoparticles. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 1423–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deng, F.; Liu, H.; Panmai, M.; Lan, S. Sharp bending and power distribution of a focused radially polarized beam by using silicon nanoparticle dimers. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 20051–20062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xifre-Perez, E.; Shi, L.; Tuzer, U.; Fenollosa, R.; Ramiro-Manzano, F.; Quidant, R.; Meseguer, F. Mirror-image-induced magnetic modes. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, F.; Liu, H.; Lan, S. Metal substrate-induced line width compression in the magnetic dipole resonance of a silicon nanosphere illuminated by a focused azimuthally polarized beam. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Xiang, J.; Li, X.F.; Zhang, C.Y.; Tie, S.L.; Lan, S. Exploiting the interaction between a semiconductor nanosphere and a thin metal film for nanoscale plasmonic devices. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18963–18971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ding, T.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, X. Integration of cascaded electro-optic and nonlinear processes on a lithium niobate on insulator chip. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 1524–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, D.; Ding, T.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, X. Cascaded sum-frequency generation and electro-optic polarization coupling in the PPLNOI ridge waveguide. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 15283–15288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jagatpal, N.; Mercante, A.J.; Ahmed, A.N.R.; Prather, D.W. Thin film lithium niobate electro-optic modulator for 1064 nm wavelength. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2021, 33, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, J.; Huang, Y.; Lu, C.; Ding, T.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, X. Tunable linear polarization-state generator of single photons on a lithium niobate chip. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 064068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, H.; Chen, X. Nonlinear moiré superlattice for super-resolution nondestructive detection of nonlinear photonic crystals. Laser Photonics Rev. 2021, 15, 2000596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, B.; Liu, H.; Yan, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X. Second-harmonic computer-generated holographic imaging through monolithic lithium niobate crystal by femtosecond laser micromachining. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 4132–4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ren, T.; Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Shao, L.; Reimer, C.; Zhang, Y.; King, O.; Esman, R.; Cullen, T.; Lončar, M. An integrated low-voltage broadband lithium niobate phase modulator. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yuan, Z.L.; Fröhlich, B.; Lucamarini, M.; Roberts, G.L.; Dynes, J.F.; Shields, A.J. Directly phase-modulated light source. Phys. Rev. X 2016, 6, 031044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Brick, D.; Emre, E.; Grossmann, M.; Dekorsy, T.; Hettich, M. Picosecond photoacoustic metrology of SiO2 and LiNbO3 layer systems used for high frequency surface-acoustic-wave filters. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 80822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shcherbakov, A.S.; Arellanes, A.O.; Bertone, E. Advanced collinear LiNbO3 acousto-optical filter for astrophysical spectroscopy in the near-ultraviolet: Exploring high-spectral resolution. J. Astron. Telesc. Inst. 2015, 1, 045002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Evlyukhin, A.B.; Fischer, T.; Reinhardt, C.; Chichkov, B.N. Optical theorem and multipole scattering of light by arbitrarily shaped nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 205434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zelmon, D.E.; Small, D.L.; Jundt, D. Infrared corrected eellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol.% magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobate. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1997, 14, 3319–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gao, L.; Lemarchand, F.; Lequime, M. Refractive index determination of SiO2 layer in the UV/Vis/NIR range: Spectrophotometric reverse engineering on single and bilayer designs. J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid 2013, 8, 13010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rakić, A.D.; Djurišić, A.B.; Elazar, J.M.; Majewski, M.L. Optical properties of metallic films for vertical-cavity optoelectronic devices. Appl. Opt. 1998, 37, 5271–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of LiNbO3 particle with diameter D = 300 nm placed on a glass substrate (a), a LiNbO3 substrate (b) and an Au film/glass substrate (c). The corresponding multipole decomposition of the scattering spectrum are displayed in the second row (df). SC represents the total scattering intensity.
Figure 1. Schematic of LiNbO3 particle with diameter D = 300 nm placed on a glass substrate (a), a LiNbO3 substrate (b) and an Au film/glass substrate (c). The corresponding multipole decomposition of the scattering spectrum are displayed in the second row (df). SC represents the total scattering intensity.
Nanomaterials 12 02010 g001
Figure 2. Electric field distributions in the yz plane at different peaks for 620 nm on glass substrate (a), LiNbO3 substrate (b), and for 665 nm on Au film/glass substrate (c). The white arrows depict the electric field vector.
Figure 2. Electric field distributions in the yz plane at different peaks for 620 nm on glass substrate (a), LiNbO3 substrate (b), and for 665 nm on Au film/glass substrate (c). The white arrows depict the electric field vector.
Nanomaterials 12 02010 g002
Figure 3. Radiation pattern in the xy plane for LiNbO3 nanoparticles (D = 300 nm) placed on an Au film/glass substrate.
Figure 3. Radiation pattern in the xy plane for LiNbO3 nanoparticles (D = 300 nm) placed on an Au film/glass substrate.
Nanomaterials 12 02010 g003
Figure 4. The calculated multipole decomposition of the scattering spectra of LiNbO3 particle with diameters (a) D = 240 nm, (b) D = 260 nm, (c) D = 280 nm, (d) D = 300 nm, (e) D = 320 nm and (f) D = 340 nm on Au film/glass substrate.
Figure 4. The calculated multipole decomposition of the scattering spectra of LiNbO3 particle with diameters (a) D = 240 nm, (b) D = 260 nm, (c) D = 280 nm, (d) D = 300 nm, (e) D = 320 nm and (f) D = 340 nm on Au film/glass substrate.
Nanomaterials 12 02010 g004
Figure 5. (a) The evolution of the scattering spectra for LiNbO3 particle of diameter D = 300 nm placed on SiO2 film/Au film/glass substrate with an increasing thickness (g) of SiO2 layer, g = 0 nm, 10 nm, 20 nm, 30 nm, 40 nm, and 50 nm. (bd) represent the electric field distribution in the yz plane for g = 10 nm at 670 nm, g = 30 nm at 690 nm, and g = 50 nm at 705 nm, respectively.
Figure 5. (a) The evolution of the scattering spectra for LiNbO3 particle of diameter D = 300 nm placed on SiO2 film/Au film/glass substrate with an increasing thickness (g) of SiO2 layer, g = 0 nm, 10 nm, 20 nm, 30 nm, 40 nm, and 50 nm. (bd) represent the electric field distribution in the yz plane for g = 10 nm at 670 nm, g = 30 nm at 690 nm, and g = 50 nm at 705 nm, respectively.
Nanomaterials 12 02010 g005
Figure 6. The calculated multipole decomposition of the scattering spectra for LiNbO3 particle placed on 50 nm Au film/glass substrate with a fixed axis of 300 nm at in the xy directions and varying axis perpendicular to the Au film. Z represents the length of the particle in the z direction with (a) Z = 325 nm, (b) Z = 350 nm, (c) Z = 375 nm and (d) Z = 400 nm.
Figure 6. The calculated multipole decomposition of the scattering spectra for LiNbO3 particle placed on 50 nm Au film/glass substrate with a fixed axis of 300 nm at in the xy directions and varying axis perpendicular to the Au film. Z represents the length of the particle in the z direction with (a) Z = 325 nm, (b) Z = 350 nm, (c) Z = 375 nm and (d) Z = 400 nm.
Nanomaterials 12 02010 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Peng, Y.; Lu, R. Substrate-Modulated Electric and Magnetic Resonances of Lithium Niobite Nanoparticles Illuminated by White Light. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122010

AMA Style

Li H, Peng Y, Lu R. Substrate-Modulated Electric and Magnetic Resonances of Lithium Niobite Nanoparticles Illuminated by White Light. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(12):2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hui, Yigeng Peng, and Ruifeng Lu. 2022. "Substrate-Modulated Electric and Magnetic Resonances of Lithium Niobite Nanoparticles Illuminated by White Light" Nanomaterials 12, no. 12: 2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12122010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop