Edge-Rich Interconnected Graphene Mesh Electrode with High Electrochemical Reactivity Applicable for Glucose Detection

The development of graphene structures with controlled edges is greatly desired for understanding heterogeneous electrochemical (EC) transfer and boosting EC applications of graphene-based electrodes. We herein report a facile, scalable, and robust method to produce graphene mesh (GM) electrodes with tailorable edge lengths. Specifically, the GMs were fabricated at 850 °C under a vacuum level of 0.6 Pa using catalytic nickel templates obtained based on a crack lithography. As the edge lengths of the GM electrodes increased from 5.48 to 24.04 m, their electron transfer rates linearly increased from 0.08 to 0.16 cm∙s−1, which are considerably greater than that (0.056 ± 0.007 cm∙s−1) of basal graphene structures (defined as zero edge length electrodes). To illustrate the EC sensing potentiality of the GM, a high-sensitivity glucose detection was conducted on the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh with the longest edge length. At a detection potential of 0.6 V, the edge-rich graphene/Ni hybrid mesh sensor exhibited a wide linear response range from 10.0 μM to 2.5 mM with a limit of detection of 1.8 μM and a high sensitivity of 1118.9 μA∙mM−1∙cm−2. Our findings suggest that edge-rich GMs can be valuable platforms in various graphene applications such as graphene-based EC sensors with controlled and improved performance.


Introduction
Graphene possesses unique properties, including excellent transparency, high thermal and electrical conductivity, large specific surface area, and excellent electrochemical (EC) stability which make it one of the most attractive materials [1][2][3][4]. Graphene has been utilized in various applications such as transparent conducting electrodes [5], energy devices [6,7], electronic and optoelectronic devices [8,9], and bio-and chemical-sensing devices [10,11]. In general, EC performance of an electrode is determined by its electron transfer kinetics and the interactions between molecules and electrode surfaces [12,13]. Recently, Yuan et al. reported that graphene edges exhibited higher specific capacitance, faster electron transfer rate, and stronger electrocatalytic activity than those of graphene basal plane [14]. Furthermore, Li et al. reported that a nanometer-thick linear graphene edge nanoelectrode showed much better EC performance compared with traditional carbon fiber microelectrodes [15]. Moreover, Pavlov et al. used theories and computations to show that the graphene edges provide ca. 4 times faster electron transfer in comparison with the basal plane [16]. Therefore, edge-rich graphene, due to its prevalent defects and dangling bonds, is considered an ideal electrode material for energy storage [17,18] and bio-and chemical-sensing applications [19][20][21].
Owing to their superior large periphery (compared to basal/planar structure), graphene mesh (GM) architectures, comprising of interconnected graphene wires, are believed as potent edge-rich graphene electrodes for advanced EC applications. Several methods have been employed to fabricate GM, including electron beam lithography [22], nanoimprint lithography [23], nanosphere-assisted lithography [24,25], template-assisted lithography [26,27], and self-organized growth [28]. However, most of these methods require complex lithography and etching (such as reactive ion etching or toxic etching solution) processes, which are costly and hard to scale up. Moreover, chemical contamination is another obstacle in the existing fabrication processes, which may cause degradation in performance of GM [29]. Recently, we developed a facile method to fabricate nickel (Ni) meshes covered with conformal graphene coating by the combination of crack lithography and rapid thermal annealing techniques [30]. Our fabrication method has advantages of simplicity, robustness, low cost, scalability, and minimal chemical contamination. Inspired by these earlier findings, we hypothesized that the exploitation of GM fabricated in a controlled manner could be of immense benefit for the sustainable development of effective graphene electrodes with tailorable EC performances.
In this study, we present a strategy to fabricate scalable GM with controllable edge lengths and investigate their edge length-dependent EC reactivity. Specifically, different edge lengths of interconnected GM samples were obtained by exploiting self-cracking TiO 2 templates with various crack densities. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was employed to assess EC performance of the fabricated GM and basal graphene samples. The results showed that the electron transfer rate of GM electrodes increased with increasing edge length and was remarkably greater than that of its basal graphene counterpart. This validates the important role of the graphene edge effects in controlling and enhancing EC performance of GM electrodes. To shed light on the possible EC applications of the edgerich GM electrodes, a high-sensitive glucose detection was conducted on the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh with the longest edge length. The edge-rich graphene/Ni hybrid mesh sensor exhibited a wide linear response range from 10.0 µM to 2.5 mM with a high sensitivity of 1118.9 µA·mM −1 ·cm −2 and a limit of detection of 1.8 µM. Our findings suggest that edge-rich GM may be a promising candidate for boosting various graphene applications such as graphene-based EC sensors with controlled and enhanced EC reactivity.

Fabrication of Ni Mesh Template
The procedure for fabricating the Ni mesh template was adapted from our preceding work [30]. First, the TiO 2 suspension was prepared by successively mixing the solution of DI water (0.5 mL), ethanol (2 mL) (99%, HY Biocare Chem, New York, NY, USA), acetic acid (4 mL) (99.7%, J.T.Baker, PA, USA), and titanium (IV) ethoxide (0.5 mL) (97%, Sigma-Aldrich, India) under continuous stirring (300 rpm). After stirring 30 min, different volumes (5 µL, 15 µL, 25 µL, 35 µL, and 50 µL) of erasable ink solution (PILOT P-WMRF8-G) were separately added and continuously stirred for 2-3 h. The density of TiO 2 crack was controlled by amount of added ink. Next, the TiO 2 suspension (100 µL) was dropcoated onto a 1.5 × 2 cm 2 cleaned Si substrate with 300 nm thick of SiO 2 layer atop. Note the SiO 2 layer is not essential for the formation of TiO 2 cracks described in below. After a few minutes, an interconnected self-cracked TiO 2 template was obtained during the evaporation of the solvents in air at room temperature due to particle packing and volume shrinkage [31,32]. Subsequently, Ni (99.99%, Gredmann) was deposited onto the self-cracked TiO 2 template by a thermal evaporator at a vacuum level of 6 × 10 −4 Pa where Ni slug was heated by a high current (150 A) to melt. The thickness of Ni was controlled by the thickness sensor of the thermal evaporator. Finally, the Ni mesh template was obtained after the lift-off TiO 2 layer by acetone solution under ultrasonication for 3-5 min.

Fabrication of Graphene Mesh
The graphene was grown on the Ni mesh template with a solid carbon precursor via a rapid thermal annealing approach as reported in previous works [30,[33][34][35][36]. The Ni mesh template and cellulose acetate (CA) (C045A047A, Advantec Toyo, Japan) were first put together in the sample container of an infrared lamp annealing system (Mila 5000, Ulvac, Advance Riko, Japan) and then annealed at constant temperature of 850 • C for 8 min at a vacuum level of 0.6 Pa. A heating rate of 10 • C/s was applied to heat from room temperature to 850 • C. After the annealing process, the sample was cooled to room temperature. Subsequently, the GM was obtained after etching Ni mesh by immersing the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh into HCl/FeCl 3 (0.1 M/0.1 M) overnight. Finally, a gold contact and a SiO 2 protection layers were successively deposited on top of the GM sample except for the center circular region (with 0.7 cm diameter) using a mask by thermal evaporation and E-beam evaporation methods, respectively.

Characterization
The morphologies and dimensions of the self-cracked TiO 2 , Ni mesh templates, planar graphene and GM samples were examined by optical microscopy (OM, Hamlet MH101, Hwatang, Taiwan), atomic force microscopy (AFM, XE70, Park Systems, Korea), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-3000H, Hitachi Asia Pacific, Taiwan). The crystallographic and layered structures of the GM samples were investigated by Raman spectroscopy (XploRA ONE, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Japan) with the excited laser at the wavelength of 638 nm. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of the field emission scanning electron microscopy (JSM-6500F, JEOL, Japan) was used to examine the elemental composition of the GM. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (PHI Hybrid Quantera, ULVAC-PHI, Japan) was used to analyze the surface chemical properties of the graphene samples.

Electrochemical Measurement
Electrochemical characterization was conducted inside a miniature reactor containing a working electrode (GM electrode), a Pt wire counter electrode, and an Ag/AgCl/KCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode (see Figure S1). All the electrodes were connected to a Jiehan 5600 electrochemical workstation. The CV curves were recorded by the electrochemical workstation. The electrolyte consisted of 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (Bu 4 NPF 6 ) (T1279, TCI, Japan) and 1.0 mM ferrocene (87202, Alfa Aesar, China) in acetonitrile (99.5%, J.T.Baker, Pennsylvania, USA)was used to determine the electron transfer rate. Glucose (D-(+) glucose, Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA) in 0.1 M NaOH was used to determine the EC sensing capability of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh electrodes. It has been reported that the current of CVs increase with the pH value of the electrolyte [37]. Since the 0.1 M NaOH solution could yield a high pH value of 13, we chose it as the electrolyte to promote the currents of CVs. The 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte is relevant even for testing the electrode in real sample, e.g., human serum, as reported in [38]. Prior to recording the CV curves, the measurements were repeatedly scanned at the same potential window until no change in the CV curves was observed. All EC measurements were performed by using a cylindrical cell with a diameter of 0.7 cm. Amperometric measurements were carried out by using the electrochemical workstation with a constant potential of 0.6 V and drop-wise addition of glucose solution every 50 s onto 0.1 M NaOH solution without stirring. The volume of added glucose solution was determined by the increased value of glucose concentration. Ascorbic acid (AA) (05878 Fluka, Honeywell, China), dopamine (DA) (Sigma Aldrich, Germany), and uric acid (UA) (Sigma Aldrich, Hungary) were used for the investigation of the interfering species presented in biological samples.

Fabrication and Characterization of Ni Mesh Template
Our fabrication procedure for GM electrode includes (1) drop coating of a TiO 2 suspension on a SiO 2 /Si substrate to form a TiO 2 crack template, (2) Ni deposition, (3) lift-off of the TiO 2 layer, (4) growing graphene on the Ni mesh template, (5) Ni removal, (6) deposition of gold (Au) contact layer and (7) deposition of SiO 2 protection layer ( Figure S2). The gold layer serves to provide a good electrical contact between GM and the potentiostat while the SiO 2 is a hard protection layer of the graphene electrodes. TiO 2 suspension was drop-coated onto the Si/SiO 2 substrate. After few minutes, an interconnected self-cracked TiO 2 template was spontaneously formed on the substrate due to the particle packing and volume shrinkage properties of TiO 2 [31,32]. Previous studies reported that crackle pattern, i.e., crack spacing and crack width, can be tuned by changing the thickness of crack layer. However, this approach is complex and may lead the detachment or delamination of the crack layer from the substrate when the crack layer thickness is too thick [39]. Therefore, it is better to find an approach to tune crack spacing without affecting the adhesion of the TiO 2 layer on the substrate. Herein, we present a facile approach to change crack spacing on the TiO 2 thin film by adding different volumes of ink solutions into TiO 2 suspensions with a fixed concentration of other chemicals. Specifically, 5 µL, 15 µL, 25 µL, 35 µL, and 50 µL of ink solutions were separately added to TiO 2 suspensions to obtain self-cracked TiO 2 templates (assigned as V-5, V-15, V-25, V-35, and V-50) with different surface coverages (SCs) of cracks, respectively. Figure S3a shows an optical microscopic image of the TiO 2 template V-50, which clearly illustrates that cracks of the template are well connected to form large amount polygonal cells. A representative crack was characterized by AFM measurement. The width of the crack is around 1.75 µm, as shown in Figure S3b. Figure S4a displays a SEM image of the Ni mesh sample obtained from the TiO 2 template V-50 (assigned as NM V-50), and it clearly demonstrates that the Ni wires of the sample NM V-50 are highly interconnected to form a replica of the crack network on the TiO 2 template V-50. The thickness of all Ni meshes used to synthesize graphene was chosen at 120 nm as indicated by the AFM profile of the NM V-50 shown in Figure S4b Figure 1a-e, respectively. These Ni mesh samples exhibit different spacing between Ni wires. A thresholding digital imaging process was used to convert the grayscale SEM images shown in Figure 1a-e to binary images. The surface coverage (SC) of Ni wires of each Ni mesh sample was determined by image processing. Figure 1f shows that the SC of Ni wires of the Ni mesh increases almost linearly with the volume of the ink solution added to the TiO 2 suspension for the preparation of the TiO 2 template, which indicates that SC of Ni wires can be easily controlled by the volume of the added ink solution.

Fabrication and Characterization of Graphene Mesh
The graphene was directly grown on the Ni mesh template by a rapid thermal annealing of the solid carbon precursor (CA) at low vacuum. During the annealing procedure, dissociated carbon atoms diffused into the Ni template, and graphene precipitated onto the Ni surface during annealing and cooling [30,[33][34][35][36]. After etching off Ni wires, only GM was left on the SiO 2 /Si substrate. As revealed from the SEM image (see Figure 2a) of the GM sample (assigned as GM V-50) obtained from the NM V-50, the GM remained the network distribution like the Ni mesh (NM V-50) template. Figure 2b shows a high magnification SEM image of the GM, which clearly demonstrates that graphene wires are continuous. As indicated by the EDS analysis of the GM V-50 displayed in Figure 2c Figure 2d, all Raman spectra of the GM samples contain the D peak at~1348 cm −1 , and two characteristic peaks of graphene; i.e., the G peak at 1580 cm −1 ; and the 2D peak at~2704 cm −1 [40,41]. The I 2D /I G, i.e., intensity ratios of the 2D peak over the G peak of all five GM samples are comparable (from 0.69 to 0.82 as shown in Table 1), and it reveals that few layers of graphene were obtained [41]. The presence of the D peak is due to defects or edges of the graphene mesh. Note the Raman spectra shown in Figure 2d were acquired with a fixed laser excitation beam size. Figure S6 plots the intensity ratio of the D peak over the G peak (I D /I G ) versus SC of graphene wires of each GM, and it clearly shows that I D /I G increases (from 0.31 to 0.88) with SC of graphene wires. It indicates that higher SC of graphene wire can yield more graphene edges.  XPS was used to analyze the surface chemical properties of graphene samples. The C 1s XPS spectra of graphene samples (displayed in Figure 3) can be mainly deconvoluted into four types of carbon bonds: the presence of carbon sp 2 at 284.5 eV, the presence of carbon sp 3 (defect peak) at 285.4 eV, and the presence of the C−O−C and O−C=O functional groups at 286.6 eV and 288.9 eV, respectively [42]. Compared to the planar graphene, the ratios of sp 2 /sp 3 of GM decreased from 7.01 to 4.5 for the GM V-5 and 4.07 for the GM V-50, indicating the presence of high edge in GM samples.

Electron Transfer Rate
CV curves of graphene-based electrodes measured in acetonitrile solution containing 0.1 M Bu 4 NPF 6 and 1.0 mM ferrocene with different scan rates are displayed in Figure 4a, which clearly shows all of them giving well-defined redox peaks. As the scanning rate increased, the anodic peaks regularly shifted to the right-hand side while the cathodic peaks regularly shifted to the left-hand side. Moreover, their peak currents increased as the scan rate increased which illustrates a quasi-reversible process, indicating effective direct electron transfer between the GM electrodes and the redox species [43,44]. The increase of peak current and the decrease of peak potential separation were observed when the SC of graphene wires increased (see Figure S7). This confirms that the GM electrode with higher SC of graphene wires exhibits better EC reactivity, because it contains more graphene edges to facilitate the EC reactivity, contributed by dangling bonds [14,15,23]. The importance of edge-reactivity can be directly inferred from the comparison of the CV diagram to continuous graphene grown under identical conditions (more information in the Supplementary Materials). Figure 4b presents the linear relationships between the anodic peak positions and the scan rates, as expected for the redox reaction of adsorbed species [45]. Their slopes decreased with the increase of the SC.   Since GM samples were directly grown on the Ni meshes, we assumed that the average width of each GM sample is close to that of Ni wires of each Ni mesh. We have measured the average widths of Ni wires of all five Ni meshes and found their average widths are very close (see Table S1). Electroactive areas of the electrodes were determined by Randles-Sevcik equation: where i p is the peak current (A), A is the electroactive area of the electrode (cm 2 ), n is the number of electrons participating in the reaction (and is equal to 1), D is the diffusion coefficient of ferrocene in 0.1 M Bu 4 NPF 6 acetonitrile (D = 2.4 × 10 −5 cm 2 ·s −1 adapted from [46,47]), C is the concentration of the probe molecule in the solution (mol·cm −3 ), and ν is the scan rate (V·s −1 ). Table 2 shows the electroactive areas of the GM electrodes determined from Equation (1). In addition, the average edge length of graphene wires of each GM sample was determined from Equation (S1). As indicated in Table S1, the average edge length of graphene wires increases with SC of graphene wires. Consequently, the GM with a higher SC of graphene wire is expected to have a stronger EC reactivity. The electron transfer rates (k) can be extracted from the scan rate dependence of the CV peak positions [48,49]. If the value of the peak separation ∆E p > 200/n (mV), where n is the number of electrons per molecule (n = 1 for ferrocene redox mediator), the value of k can be calculated from following equation: where: ν is the scan rate (V/s), R (= 8.314 J·mol −1 ·K −1 ) is the ideal gas constant, T is the room temperature (K), F is 96485.333 C·mol −1 , and α is the transfer coefficient between the electroactive compound and the graphene electrode. α can be determined from plots of scan rate versus peak position E p = f (log ν) which yields two straight lines with one slope equal to 2.3RT/(1−α)nF for the anodic peak, and the another equal to −2.3RT/αnF for the cathodic peak [49] (more information in the Supplementary Materials). According to Equation (2), the electron transfer rate decreases with ∆E p [43,50]. The k value at each electrode was calculated using Equation (2) and plotted as a function of the edge length in Figure 4c. Note that the edge length of each electrode was determined by Equation (S1), and the edge length of the planar graphene electrode was assumed to be zero. The k value of the planar graphene scattered in ferrocene redox mediator (~0.056 cm·s −1 ) is close to the results of CVD graphene reported in [45,48]. As displayed, the k value increases with the edge length. The red line exhibits a linear fitting of k values exhibiting a linear increase of the electron transfer rates from 0.056 to 0.160 cm·s −1 as the edge length of the GM electrodes increased from 0 to 24.04 m. This result confirms that increasing SC of the GM indeed promotes its EC reactivity because of the increase of graphene edge, where more ions from electrolyte are accumulated [14,23]. Table 2. The electroactive areas of the graphene mesh (GM) samples.

Application on Enzyme-Free Glucose Detection
For enzyme-free glucose detection, the transition metals (e.g., Ni, Cu, Co) and their oxides are widely used as the metal catalysts due to their high sensitivity, good stability and low-cost [51,52]. Among them, Ni-based materials have received great attention due to their higher sensitivity than other metals which is attributed to the high catalytic activity of NiOOH produced by Ni(OH) 2 [53]. To illustrate the EC sensing potentiality of the edge-rich GM, a high-sensitivity glucose detection was conducted on the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh (Ni template was not etched). In this investigation, the Ni mesh template, that was used to grow graphene mesh, was utilized as the metal catalyst. For comparison, the glucose detection was performed using the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 and V-5 samples. Their CV curves processed in 0.1 M NaOH solution at 50 mV·s −1 in the absence and the presence of 0.5 mM glucose are displayed in Figure S10. Both samples showed significantly increased responses in the presence of 0.5 mM glucose in 0.1 M NaOH solution electrolyte. The current intensity obtained from the hybrid mesh V-50 sample was higher than that of the hybrid mesh V-5 sample indicating that the former had a better performance. Therefore, the hybrid mesh V-50 sample was used for further investigation of glucose detection. The SEM image and the EDS analysis of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 are displayed in Figure S11. CV measurements processed in 0.1 M NaOH solution at various scan rates are presented in Figure 5a. A pair of redox peaks were observed for all the CV curves at the potential range of 0-0.8 V, which were attributed to the redox process of Ni 2+ /Ni 3+ . Ni 0 first reacted with OH − ions to generate Ni 2+ . The Ni 2+ was then oxidized into Ni 3+ in the anodic sweep, and the Ni 3+ was reduced to Ni 2+ in the cathodic sweep [51]. With the increase of scan rate, the positive and negative shifts were observed for anodic and cathodic peaks, respectively, indicating a quasi-reversible electrochemical process [44]. Figure 5b displays the CVs of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 with various glucose concentrations in 0.1 M NaOH solution at a scan rate of 50 mV·s −1 . Obviously, when the concentration of glucose increased, a remarkable increase of the current intensity and a slight positive shift of the potential at anodic peak were observed; while the cathodic peak potential was almost stable, suggesting good electrocatalytic activity of the graphene/Ni hybrid material towards glucose oxidation [51]. The reactions can be described as the following equations [51,53]: NiOOH + glucose → Ni(OH) 2 + glucolacton (5) The increase of current at both anodic and cathodic peaks in the presence of glucose are similar to the results reported in [53]. We propose that when glucose was added, more NiOOH were needed to react with glucose (see Reaction (5)), which promoted the oxidation process (see Reaction (4)) and the anodic peak current. In the meantime, the adding of glucose also produced more Ni(OH) 2 through the Reaction (5) and that facilitated the reduction process of Ni(OH) 2 + 2e − → Ni + 2OH − and the cathodic peak current. Figure 5c displays the typical amperometric response of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 electrode with successive additions of glucose solution at 50 s intervals into 0.1 M NaOH solution at applied potential of 0.6 V. As shown, the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 electrode exhibited a rapid current response after the additions of glucose solution, representing an efficient and rapid response to glucose concentration. Furthermore, a good linear relationship was found between the amperometric current and glucose concentration in the range from 10 µM to 2.5 mM (see Figure 5d), and its regression equation was i(mA) = 0.373 + 0.753·C(mM) with R 2 = 0.9963. A large intercept was attributed to a large peak intensity due to the high catalytic activity of Ni wires at zero glucose concentration. Based on this equation, the sensitivity of the graphene/Ni mesh V-50 electrode was found to be 1118.9 µA·mM −1 ·cm −2 obtained by dividing the slope of the regression equation by the active area of the electrode [54]. The limit of detection of the sensor was determined to be 1.8 µM at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. Although the normal blood glucose level (4.0 to 5.5 mM) [55] is out of the calibration curve range (see Figure 5d) of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 electrode, the electrode is still usable for real sample analysis just simply by diluting the real sample in the 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte to have a level of blood glucose within the calibration range. A comparison of our present sensor with other graphene-based non-enzymatic glucose sensors is summarized in Table 3. Its EC analytical performance is comparable to those of the previously reported sensors, and its fast and sensitive response to glucose is attributed to the high electron transfer rate contributed from the edge-rich architecture of the GM and catalysis of Ni material. The selectivity of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 electrode was investigated using some interfering species that normally co-exist with glucose in human blood serum, such as AA, DA, and AA [52]. The typical level of glucose in human blood is about 30 times higher than the interfering species [53]. Therefore, the interference experiments were tested by successive additions of 1.0 mM of glucose, 0.1 mM of interfering species, and 0.5 mM of glucose, respectively, into 0.1 M NaOH solution at applied potential of 0.6 V. As displayed in Figure S12, the responses from the glucose are much higher than those from interfering species, exhibiting a good selectivity of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 electrode in using as the glucose sensor.

Conclusions
In conclusion, we have presented a facile and robust approach to fabricate large-scale and high-quality GM samples with controllable edge lengths by the combination of crack lithography and rapid thermal annealing techniques. The edge lengths of interconnected GM samples were controlled by the crack density of TiO 2 films. The electron transfer rates of the GM samples were evaluated and the result showed an increase in electron transfer rate with increasing graphene edge length. Moreover, we found all the GM electrodes exhibited considerably greater electron transfer rates than that of the basal graphene electrode. This indicates that the abundant graphene edge of the GM electrodes indeed is the main attribution for the enhancement of their EC performance. Furthermore, the sensor made of the graphene/Ni mesh V-50 exhibited a wide linear glucose response range from 10.0 µM to 2.5 mM with a limit of detection of 1.8 µM and a high sensitivity of 1118.9 µA·mM −1 ·cm −2 . The edge-rich GM V-50 presented in this work shows a great promise for advancing various graphene applications such as graphene-based EC sensors with controlled performances.

Supplementary Materials:
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4 991/11/2/511/s1, Figure S1: Cyclic voltammetry measurement setup; Figure S2: (a) Schematic of fabrication procedure of the GM electrode, (b) The cross-section view of the electrode; Figure S3: (a) Optical microscopic image and (b) AFM profile of representative cracks of the TiO 2 template V-50; Figure S4: (a) SEM image of the Ni mesh obtained with the TiO 2 template V-50, (b) AFM profile of the NM V-50; Figure S5: The SEM images of several random positions of the Ni mesh (NM V-50) sample obtained from the TiO 2 template V-50; Figure S6: The intensity ratio of D/G peak vs. surface coverage of graphene wires of each GM electrode; Figure S7: Representative cyclic voltammograms of graphene electrodes with different SC of graphene wire in 1 mM ferrocene and 0.1 M Bu 4 NPF 6 in acetonitrile electrolyte obtained at a scan rate of 0.02 V/s; Figure S8: Planar graphene (a) OM image, (b) Raman shift spectrum; Figure S9: Anodic peak position vs. log(scan rate); Figure S10: CV of (a) the hybrid mesh V-5 and (b) V-50 electrodes in 0.1 M NaOH with/without glucose; Figure S11: SEM image of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50; (b) EDS analysis of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh; Figure S12: Selectivity of the graphene/Ni hybrid mesh V-50 measured with 1 mM glucose, 0.1 mM AA, 0.1 mM DA, 0.1 mM UA and 0.5 mM glucose in 0.1 M NaOH. Table S1: Average width and average edge length of graphene wire, Table S2: The transfer coefficients (α) between electroactive compound and the graphene electrode.  Institutional Review Board Statement: "Not applicable" for studies not involving humans or animals.
Informed Consent Statement: "Not applicable" for studies not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement:
Data is available upon the reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.