Boat Noise and Black Drum Vocalizations in Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon (Argentina)

: Human-generated underwater noise and its effect on marine biota is recognized as an important issue. Boat noise can affect the communication success of ﬁsh species that use sounds for spawning purposes. During the reproductive period, males of the black drum Pogonias spp. produce calls ranging from 90 Hz to 300 Hz. In the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon (Buenos Aires, Argentina), Pogonias courbina is one of the primary ﬁshing species. Although no regulation is directly applied to protect it, a ban protects the reproductive period of other ﬁsh species during weekdays. Here, we investigated the potential effect of boat noise on P. courbina vocalizations through a passive acoustic method. Acoustic data were collected, and P. courbina calls were identiﬁed and counted. The ﬁles with boat noise passages were categorized into classes according to their noise frequency range (A = below 700 Hz, B = over 700 Hz, and C = below and above 700 Hz). The ﬁsh call rate was lower in ﬁles where boat noise overlapped the ﬁsh call frequency (Classes A and C). Only boat noise from Class C was signiﬁcantly reduced during days with the active ﬁshing ban. These results suggest that anthropogenic noise may affect the P. courbina call rate and underline the importance of including the evaluation of anthropogenic noise in the current management of the area.


Introduction
Growing human density in coastal habitats is leading to increased anthropogenic pollution, among which are increasing levels of human-generated noise in underwater habitats. Its effect on animal assemblages is an important problem for the community [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Human noise can affect the health and well-being of aquatic animals, from mammals [7][8][9] to invertebrates [10][11][12], leading to physiological and behavioral changes. The response to noise occurs through adaptation or avoidance strategies [13][14][15][16][17]. The responses can be different at the species level, and little is known about them for many species.
Sciaenidae is an important teleost family that comprises about 270 species [18,19]. They are known as croakers and drums for their extensive use of sounds to communicate [20]. The sounds produced are generally composed of trains of pulses, with a frequency range between 100 Hz and 1000 Hz and little modulation [20]. The calls have been classified as reproductive and disturbance calls. Reproductive calls are emitted during the spawning season by males, with a general increase during night hours [21,22].
Black drum Pogonias spp. are distributed along coastal waters in both the northwest and southwest areas of the Atlantic Ocean. They have been recently redescribed based on molecular and morphologic evidence, differentiating the black drum Pogonias courbina No. 89/08 of the Ministry of Agrarian Issues of the Buenos Aires Province. However, no regulation is directly applied to protect the other fish species.
Despite the number of publications on the local fish community (e.g., [46,48,49]), few studies have been carried out on the acoustic activity of species in the area [50,51]. A previous study [52] investigated the lagoon soundscape and its variations from the mouth to the inner side of the lagoon, revealing the highest presence of black drum mating calls in the mouth of the lagoon and during the month of November. Moreover, results showed that this part of the lagoon was the most affected by boat noise in the same period, highlighting the need to further investigate the possible implications.
For this reason, the aim of this study was to evaluate the following: (1) The level of boat noise in the mouth of the lagoon; (2) The temporal overlapping of black drum sounds and boat noises in the mouth of the lagoon; (3) The potential effect on black drum acoustic activity; (4) The effectiveness of the fishing ban on boat noise in the mouth of the lagoon.

Study Area
The Mar Chiquita (Buenos Aires, Argentina) coastal lagoon is connected to the sea through an inlet channel 6 km long and about 200 m wide ( Figure 1) [43,53].
during weekdays (Monday to Friday), from September 1 to December 1 every imposed by Provision No. 89/08 of the Ministry of Agrarian Issues of the Buen Province. However, no regulation is directly applied to protect the other fish spe Despite the number of publications on the local fish community (e.g., [46,48, studies have been carried out on the acoustic activity of species in the area [ previous study [52] investigated the lagoon soundscape and its variations from th to the inner side of the lagoon, revealing the highest presence of black drum ma in the mouth of the lagoon and during the month of November. Moreover, results that this part of the lagoon was the most affected by boat noise in the same highlighting the need to further investigate the possible implications.
For this reason, the aim of this study was to evaluate the following: 1) The level of boat noise in the mouth of the lagoon; 2) The temporal overlapping of black drum sounds and boat noises in the mou lagoon; 3) The potential effect on black drum acoustic activity; 4) The effectiveness of the fishing ban on boat noise in the mouth of the lagoon

Study Area
The Mar Chiquita (Buenos Aires, Argentina) coastal lagoon is connected t through an inlet channel 6 km long and about 200 m wide ( Figure 1) [43,53]. The environmental characteristics of the lagoon change from the mout headlands, being comparable to the coastal sea area in the mouth and influence The environmental characteristics of the lagoon change from the mouth to the headlands, being comparable to the coastal sea area in the mouth and influenced by the freshwater conditions in the headlands [53]. The depth of the lagoon in the estuarine region is typically 1.5-2 m, while it reaches 3 m in the discharge channel in the mouth [43,55,56].The lagoon has important conservation value for its unique ecosystem (classified by the MAB Programme by UNESCO [44]). Here, the black drum is among the primary fished species, due to its size and flesh quality [47]. It is an estuary-dependent marine fish, abundant in the mouth of the lagoon during the autumn, spring, and summer [49]. Vessels in the lagoon are represented by small boats, with lengths less than 4 m, equipped with a small outboard engine and adapted to move around in the shallow waters of the estuarine region, mostly using the deeper central area of the lagoon.

Data Collection
Data were collected with an autonomous recorder deployed close to the mouth of the lagoon (37 • 44 S, 57 • 25 W). The recorder was vertically attached to a semi-buried metal stake and firmly secured by plastic zip ties to avoid any vibration. In order to be underwater for the entire sampling time, the hydrophone was positioned during low tide conditions at a water depth of 70 cm at the site of deployment, remaining at 30 cm from the bottom of the lagoon. The deployment site was 15 m from the coast side and about 90 m from the central and deepest part of the lagoon, where vessels pass by more frequently.
The recorder (Lunilettronik, Italy) consisted of an omnidirectional, preamplified, calibrated hydrophone with a flat sensitivity response of −174.5 (±2) dB re V/µPa from 0.1 Hz to 70 kHz (Benthowave BII 7016 T6 low-noise broadband hydrophone) and a digital signal processor (C5535 DSP-TMS320C5535) coupled with an AIC3204 audio codec (Texas Instruments). The recordings were carried out using a sample frequency of 192 kHz at 16 bits, alternating between 2 min of recordings and 8 min of pause (duty cycle of 20%). Data were collected in November (spring season) during 3 sessions of 5 days each. Each session covered both weekdays and weekends, with and without the fishing ban, respectively ( Table 1). The water temperature was recorded with the temperature sensor of the hydrophone during the sampling period.

Sound Analysis
Using iZotope RX software, the dataset was aurally and visually inspected through a spectrogram survey, using a logarithmic frequency scale to obtain preliminary identification of the different sound sources, exclude files with noises conceivably generated by crustaceans touching the hydrophone, and identify and classify files with boat noise.
To quantify the potential impact of boat noise, files with boat passages were visually and aurally identified in the spectrogram. A preliminary screening highlighted the presence of different types of boat noise, as found by Smott et al. [37] while investigating the anthropogenic component of the May River estuary (South Carolina, USA) soundscape. All files containing boat noise were categorized into three classes, based on the noise frequency range extension (Figure 2a,c):

1.
Class A: narrow band noise, with low frequency noise in a range below 700 Hz; 2.
Class B: mid-frequency noise, with mid-to-high frequency noise in a range over 700 Hz; 3.
Class C: burst broadband noise, with the entire band noise covering the entire spectrum (below and above 700 Hz).  The count of single drum calls was carried out by combining automatic and manual analysis. First, all acoustic files were downsampled from 192 Hz to 6 kHz. Using the merge function of Avisoft SASlab Pro software (Avisoft-SASLab Pro-Avisoft Bioacoustics), one All files without boat noise were included in a fourth class: Class N. Noise classes can be related to the velocity of traveling boats [57] and the use of particular engines [58]. The categorization was deemed important and retained for this study since, from the black drum audiogram, this species ended up being less sensitive to noise over 600 Hz [30].
Based on previous descriptions of black drum signals [22,28,29], the recorded P. courbina calls were identified as loud drum sounds emitted during courtship behavior by males before spawning (Figure 2d,e).
In order to evaluate the overlapping frequencies between fish sounds and different kinds of boat noise, for each 2 min file with the presence of only boat noise, fish chorus, and background noise, the average power spectrum was calculated.
The count of single drum calls was carried out by combining automatic and manual analysis. First, all acoustic files were downsampled from 192 Hz to 6 kHz. Using the merge function of Avisoft SASlab Pro software (Avisoft-SASLab Pro-Avisoft Bioacoustics), one daily file at the start and end of the chorus was generated. In order to isolate the calls from the noise, a band pass filter from 0.1 kHz to 0.7 kHz was applied to these files, and each call was automatically counted using the pulse train analysis with labelled output function of the software. After preliminary tests, the following parameters were empirically set and maintained for the analysis of the entire data set: time constant 50 ms, threshold 0.17 Pa, hysteresis 5 dB, start and end threshold −1 dB. The pulse train analysis automatically counted and marked every single call in the waveform that overpassed the fixed energy threshold. This parameter is not adaptive to background noise, so that made it possible to count the signals during intense chorus activity, but it did not increase during boat noise passages or windy conditions. On the one hand, this did not affect the sensitivity of the method when there was a lot of background noise, but on the other hand, water or boat noise could be incorrectly detected, leading to false positive errors (see Figure 3). For this reason, manual and automatic analysis were combined.
All the recordings were visually checked by an expert operator, and false positive errors due to the automatic counting during noise emission were adjusted (see Figure 3g).
If boat noise was so intense as to prevent the identification of black drum calls, that section of the recordings was excluded from the data set. In total, 1.3 min (3%) of recordings were excluded from the data set. In all the other cases, the intensity of the calls was intense enough to make them identifiable in the waveform by the pulse train count (see Figure 3e-h). The intensity of the fish call (see the result section of Figure 4), combined with the used acoustic filter, led to supporting the correct assessment of call numbers during Class A and C boat noise as well.
section of the recordings was excluded from the data set. In total, 1.3 min (3%) of recordings were excluded from the data set. In all the other cases, the intensity of the calls was intense enough to make them identifiable in the waveform by the pulse train count (see Figure 3e-h). The intensity of the fish call (see the result section of Figure 4), combined with the used acoustic filter, led to supporting the correct assessment of call numbers during Class A and C boat noise as well.   In order to normalize the data, the black drum call rate parameter was measured, dividing the number of counted calls by the duration in seconds of the analyzed recording: In order to normalize the data, the black drum call rate parameter was measured, dividing the number of counted calls by the duration in seconds of the analyzed recording: To evaluate if the presence of different kinds of boat noise could affect the black drum call rate while also considering possible variability due to the different daily environmental conditions and the time of day, linear mixed models (LMMs [59]) were carried out, including the data where fish calls were recorded (black drum call rate >0) as a dependent variable and the boat type variable (Class A, Class B, Class C, or Class N) as a possible explicative factor. The day and hours factors were included and tested as possible random factors, either individually or combined. A Gaussian family distribution and identity link function were chosen. The best fit model was selected by means of model averaging, based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Validation graphs (e.g., plots of observed versus predicted values, the residuals versus predicted values, and normal quantile-quantile (Q-Q)) were analyzed to control for possible model misspecification and the presence of outliers (see Figure A1).
Moreover, considering only files where fish calls were detected, the Pearson's correlation between the black drum call rate and the temperature was calculated.
Finally, to understand if the boat noise recorded in the lagoon was affected by the fishing ban, the daily average of the boat recordings was calculated as follows: Daily The values calculated during the days with and without the fishing ban were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results
In total, 2063 files of 2 min each were recorded. Boat noise was recorded in 550 files (27%); in particular, 163 files were categorized as Class A noise, 133 as Class B, and 251 as Class C. Fish sounds were recorded in 188 files.
The most intense noise was generated by the boats in Class C, resulting in an average increase of 11.8 dB (±1.83 dB) from 70 Hz to 3800 Hz compared with the background noise. Boats in Classes A and B were less intense, with an average noise increase of 7.46 dB (±1.06 dB) and 7.22 dB (±2.61 dB), respectively, in the same frequency range. The fish chorus resulted in an increase in energy of about 11.35 dB (±4.16 dB) from 70 Hz to 600 Hz. In this frequency range, the average increase of SPL rms , determined by the boat noise of Class C, was 10.64 dB (±1.86 dB), whereas for Class A it was 8.86 dB (±1.49 dB) and for Class B it was only 4.01 dB (±0.46 dB) (Figure 4).
Fish and boat noises were recorded during the whole sampled period. The black drum chorus generally started at 5:00 p.m. and continued throughout the night. Boat noise and black drum calls were recorded simultaneously for 12.8% of the data collected and 17% of the chorus time emission ( Figure 5).  Figure A1. The presence or absence of boats significantly affected the number of fish signals (ANOVA: F = 5.55, df = 3, p < 0.01, shown in Figure 6). The best linear mixed model (LMM) selected included both the hour and day variables as random factors. The observed vs. predicted values, the residuals vs. predicted values, and the normal Q-Q plots are reported in Figure A1.
The presence or absence of boats significantly affected the number of fish signals (ANOVA: F = 5.55, df = 3, p < 0.01, shown in Figure 6). The best linear mixed model (LMM) selected included both the hour and day variables as random factors. The observed vs. predicted values, the residuals vs. predicted values, and the normal Q-Q plots are reported in Figure A1.
The presence or absence of boats significantly affected the number of fish signals (ANOVA: F = 5.55, df = 3, p < 0.01, shown in Figure 6). The estimated variation of the call rate for different classes of boat noise with respect to the absence of boat noise is reported in Table 2. There was a total of 561 calls for Class A, 1857 for Class B, 323 for Class C, and 22,862 for Class N. The presence of Class A and C boat noise resulted in a significant reduction of the black drum call rate. In particular, the effect was higher with the presence of Class C noise ( Table 2).
The temperature in the sampled period ranged from 14.8 °C to 22.6 °C. The Pearson's correlation was not significant between the number of signals and the water temperature (ρ = 0.108, p = 0.141). The estimated variation of the call rate for different classes of boat noise with respect to the absence of boat noise is reported in Table 2. There was a total of 561 calls for Class A, 1857 for Class B, 323 for Class C, and 22,862 for Class N. The presence of Class A and C boat noise resulted in a significant reduction of the black drum call rate. In particular, the effect was higher with the presence of Class C noise ( Table 2).
The temperature in the sampled period ranged from 14.8 • C to 22.6 • C. The Pearson's correlation was not significant between the number of signals and the water temperature ( = 0.108, p = 0.141).
The comparison of the daily average of boat recordings in the presence and absence of the fishing ban showed a significant reduction for the boat noise of Class C during the ban (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = −3025, p < 0.01) and no differences for the other boat noise classes (Figure 7).
The comparison of the daily average of boat recordings in the presence and absence of the fishing ban showed a significant reduction for the boat noise of Class C during the ban (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = −3025, p < 0.01) and no differences for the other boat noise classes (Figure 7).

Discussions
This work described and quantified the level of boat noise in the mouth of the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon, a Man and the Biosphere reserve, in the presence and absence of a fishing ban and evaluated the possible effect of boat noise on the chorus vocalizations of an important local fish species, the black drum. Our results showed that in the presence of boat noise that overlapped the emissions of fish calls and the hearing frequency range of the species, the black drum call rate was lower. The fishing ban led to a significant reduction of only the most intense boat sounds, but it did not affect other kinds of boat noise. Our results suggest that boat noise might affect the Pogonias courbina call rate and that an evaluation of the impact of anthropogenic noise would be important to improve management efforts in the lagoon.
The boat noise recorded in the lagoon during the spring season accounted for 27% of the time sampled, and it was divided into three classes based on the frequency extension in the spectrogram. The SPLrms measurements in the most sensitive frequency band of black drum fish showed that boat noise extending along the entire frequency band (Class C, defined as burst broadband) was the most intense, while low-frequency (Class A, defined as narrowband) and mid-frequency (Class B) noise was less intense.
Li et al. [57] showed that the frequency ranges of boat noise depend on the velocity of travel; high-speed boats generated burst broadband noise up to 180 kHz, with greater components in the mid-to high-frequency ranges, while low-frequency boat noise was associated to a boat traveling at a slow speed or idling [37]. Basing on these data, recordings in the Mar Chiquita lagoon of Classes A and C could represent boats with

Discussions
This work described and quantified the level of boat noise in the mouth of the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon, a Man and the Biosphere reserve, in the presence and absence of a fishing ban and evaluated the possible effect of boat noise on the chorus vocalizations of an important local fish species, the black drum. Our results showed that in the presence of boat noise that overlapped the emissions of fish calls and the hearing frequency range of the species, the black drum call rate was lower. The fishing ban led to a significant reduction of only the most intense boat sounds, but it did not affect other kinds of boat noise. Our results suggest that boat noise might affect the Pogonias courbina call rate and that an evaluation of the impact of anthropogenic noise would be important to improve management efforts in the lagoon.
The boat noise recorded in the lagoon during the spring season accounted for 27% of the time sampled, and it was divided into three classes based on the frequency extension in the spectrogram. The SPL rms measurements in the most sensitive frequency band of black drum fish showed that boat noise extending along the entire frequency band (Class C, defined as burst broadband) was the most intense, while low-frequency (Class A, defined as narrowband) and mid-frequency (Class B) noise was less intense.
Li et al. [57] showed that the frequency ranges of boat noise depend on the velocity of travel; high-speed boats generated burst broadband noise up to 180 kHz, with greater components in the mid-to high-frequency ranges, while low-frequency boat noise was associated to a boat traveling at a slow speed or idling [37]. Basing on these data, recordings in the Mar Chiquita lagoon of Classes A and C could represent boats with different velocities in the area. The mid-frequency class (Class B), on the contrary, was less intense than the others below 1500 Hz, but over this frequency, its energy increase became higher than the noise from Class A. This suggests an association of this noise with specific kinds of boats more than their travel patterns, particularly watercraft or small boats with outboard or inboard engines [58]. The boats used inside the lagoon are mostly small (less than 4 m with a little outboard engine, generally 10 HP), but some bigger ones (about 6 m with 60 HP engines) can be used in the inlet to fish out of the lagoon. Nevertheless, Mar Chiquita is characterized by shallow water conditions with a mean depth of less than 1 m [43], and the recorded mid-frequency boat noise could have been the result of a combination of particular vessel propellers and high-pass filter action due to the low depth [4,60].
The black drum signals recorded in Mar Chiquita showed three frequency peaks (94, 210, and 280 Hz) matching those described in [31]. On the contrary, the calls described by Tellechea et al. [29] for the southern species showed a fundamental frequency of about 135 Hz. The reason for this mismatch could be related to the length of the specimens or to propagation conditions in the studied area, and this needs to be deeply investigated. The black drum chorus in the lagoon was very intense, and the average SPL rms recorded achieved comparable values to noisier boats. On the contrary, Smott et al. [37] found that the energy levels measured from Class C and B boats were above the power spectral density of the black drum chorus measurements in the May River estuary, suggesting that these two noise classes could increase the risk of auditory masking (defined as interference in the perception of important sounds by others, influencing detection, discrimination, and signal recognition [61]). Our results could be due to the relative distances of fish and boat sources from the hydrophone deployment site, which was located closer to the coastline than to the middle of the lagoon, an area mainly used by boats for transit. Moreover, boats in the area generally move slowly due to the presence of sand banks and the generally low depth. However, the effect of noise on animal communication may be related not only to its amplitude but also to the overlap in frequency between the noise and animal acoustic space [61]. In our work, Class A and class C boat noise showed comparable SPL rms values to fish signals, falling in the frequency range used by black drums for their calls (100-300 Hz) and in their most sensitive range (up to 500 Hz). On the contrary, Class B showed the same attenuation in the important frequency range of the species for emission as for the perception of acoustic signals. Based on this, it is likely that Class A and C boat noise that occurs simultaneously with call emission can affect black drum communication, leading to a masking effect [62].
In the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon, boat noise reached high levels during the day hours throughout the sampled period, occurring in up to 100% of the recorded files in some hours. Meanwhile, the fish acoustic activity generally started from 5:00 p.m. The two sounds overlapped for some hours on all days, mostly during sunrise, reaching an almost 17% co-presence during chorus activity. During this period, our results showed a reduction in the fish call rate in the presence of Class A and C boat noise when compared with the no-boat condition. The reduction of calls could indicate a temporary interruption of acoustic behavior and could also be related to animals moving away from the recording area.
The variation in the number of calls did not show a correlation with temperature variation which, in the sampled period, ranged from 14.8 • C to 22.6 • C, but the analysis could be improved by increasing the length of time for data collection and following the entire mating period.
Several works have shown that fish species modify their behavior when there is boat noise (e.g., foraging [63], predation, and survival [64]), their hearing threshold changes [65,66], and it affects successful mating [61]. The responses differ according to the species, the life stage, and the kind and duration of the stimulus [67][68][69]. Few studies have focused on vocal communication variations. Picciulin et al. [40] and Holt and Johnston [41] reported that Sciena umbra and Cyprinella venusta, respectively, emitted an increased number of signals during boat noise. This was interpreted as compensation behavior necessary to obtain successful communication in noisy conditions. On the contrary, the reduced emission of courtship drums during continuous noise (30 min of stimulus) by males of two goby species (Gobiusculus flavescens and Pomatoschistus pictus) was found in a controlled tank experiment [42]. In accordance with de Jong et al. [42], our results showed a reduced rate of Pogonias courbina calls during noise emission.
Our results are the first evidence of possible noise effects on P.courbina communication. However, some limitations, due to the use of the passive acoustic method in a natural environment with a non-continuous sampling design, need to be highlighted. Indeed, despite this method giving the opportunity to study animal acoustic behavior without human operator interference, it does not allow for control of some important variables (e.g., fish school size and distance between the black drum fish group and the boat) that may affect the fish response to boat noise. The absence of visual observation of boats in the area during the recordings and the use of a single hydrophone did not allow us to exactly match the noise recorded with the different boats moving in the lagoon and to estimate the locations of fish. For this reason, even though the high intensity of fish signals and the use of a conservative approach for the analysis (combining automatic and manual detection of filtered signals and excluding the parts of recordings with intense masking) allowed us to support that our detection capacity was not affected by noise-fish call overlapping, only the information about fish and boat locations could dispel any doubts and confirm our results. Moreover, although the use of a non-continuous sampling design let us consider every boat noise event as independent from the previous one, this limits the possibility to make inferences about changing behavior over time, the relation to prolonged noise exposure, or the duration of the effects once the sound source was no longer present [64]. This point was found to be important for other fish species. For example, Picciulin et al. [40] found that the response of brown meagre to boat noise was not immediate, only starting after some vessel passages. On the contrary, Mauro et al. [69] found that the reaction of Sparus aurata to boat noise was immediate, and it returned to normal levels after prolonged exposure. Future studies using continuous sampling design and lasting the entire mating season will help to better understand boat and fish interactions.
In sonic fish species like black drums, in which males use acoustic signals to attract females for mating, the timing overlap between noise and mating calls and their relative reduction can lead to a decreased effectiveness of courtship behavior, with possible consequences on mating success and population survival. In common goby (Pomatoschistus microps), it was demonstrated that the disturbance effects generated by continuous boat noise could be transferred out to the sound's temporal coincidence, influencing male signal perception from females, increasing female latency in nest inspection and spawning, and decreasing spawning probability [33]. During our study in the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon, an overlap between boat noise and fish acoustic activity was found at the beginning of the fish's nocturnal acoustic activity and reached 17% coincidence in chorus activity time. Considering that our study was carried out for only one month of recording, we cannot exclude possible changes in human use of the area and relative fish responses with the onset of mating season.
No previous studies have reported on black drum communication success in the presence of boat noise and the effects on reproduction of this species, and further studies are needed to focus on this aspect, increasing the temporal and spatial scale of analysis and investigating the possible effects on reproductive success of this species to better understand the scale of the phenomenon at a population level.
Considering our results, particular attention needs to be focused on the management of boating activity in the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon. Our data show that the area is selected as a possible spawning site by male black drums. Even if information about the actual state of reproduction activity in the lagoon is missing, our data suggest that boat noise at least interferes with the reproductive acoustic activity of males of this species. In the area, boat usage is related to recreational fishing, and the impact in terms of noise is concentrated in the mouth of the lagoon, close to the village [52]. This activity is governed by Provision No. 89/08 of the Ministry of Agrarian Issues of the Province of Buenos Aires. The provision, which protects the reproductive period of Odontesthes spp., imposed a partial ban of this species, allowing fishing activities only during weekends (Saturday and Sunday) from September 1 to December 1 every year. From our results, this ban led to a significant reduction of only Class C boat noise in the area and did not affect the other classes of noise. This result needs to be extended by collecting data over a longer period of time, covering the entire ban period, but for now it suggests the need for some mitigation strategies to reduce the impact of noise in the lagoon, at least during black drum reproductive periods. For example, promoting the use of engines with less impact in terms of noise and limiting boating activity during the period of fish acoustic activity could be considered as possible solutions to mitigate the effects. Nowadays, management strategies are directed at a species-specific level and are related only to fish activity without considering noise as possible pollutant, with potential effects on multiple species. More data and specific studies on this aspect are needed to study the noise effects on an ecosystem scale. The use of a categorization approach to classify the boat noise can furnish a tool to promote specific management strategies able to support not only species conservation, but also sustainable development of human activities in the area. This is especially important in a Man and the Biosphere reserve, where it aims to establish a balanced human-nature coexistence.

Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.