Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Coupling Coordination Among Digital Village Development, Agricultural Modernization, and Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency: An Empirical Study Based on a Triple-System Coupling and GTWR Model
Previous Article in Journal
Carpel-Specific Suppression of GhCKX3b Enhances Cotton Yield Without Compromising Fiber Quality in the Elite Cultivar ‘Yuanmian 8’
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional and Fiber Quality Assessment of Native Greek Dactylis glomerata Populations

by
Vasileios Greveniotis
1,*,
Elisavet Bouloumpasi
2,
Adriana Skendi
2,
Dimitrios Kantas
3 and
Constantinos G. Ipsilandis
4
1
Institute of Industrial and Forage Crops, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA (ELGO-DIMITRA), GR-41335 Larissa, Greece
2
Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-66100 Drama, Greece
3
Department of Animal Science, University of Thessaly, Campus Gaiopolis, GR-41500 Larissa, Greece
4
Regional Administration of West Macedonia, GR-50131 Kozani, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2026, 16(11), 1132; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111132
Submission received: 19 March 2026 / Revised: 24 April 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 22 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Production)

Abstract

Dactylis glomerata, a perennial forage grass widely distributed in Mediterranean areas, is recognized for its adaptability and nutritional quality. This study aimed to assess the chemical composition and fiber components of ten natural populations of Dactylis glomerata in order to characterize genetic variability in nutritional and fiber traits among populations. Seeds of all populations were established in a randomized complete block design with four replicates and cultivated for two consecutive years. Forage was collected at the boot stage, and analyses were conducted for crude protein, ash, crude fiber, neutral and acid detergent fibers, acid detergent lignin, hemicellulose, cellulose, digestible dry matter, dry matter intake, and relative feed value. Combined ANOVA indicated that genotypic effects were highly significant for all traits (p ≤ 0.001), with additional significant contributions from environmental and genotype × environment interactions. Crude protein ranged from 11.74% to 14.98%, neutral detergent fiber from 56.31% to 58.43%, and relative feed value from 100.1 to 106.4 among populations. Stability index analysis identified Kefalopotamos and Filyra as the most environmentally stable populations, whereas Kori and Xyloparoiko exhibited relatively higher values in selected forage quality traits. Broad-sense heritability values were high for the majority of traits (H2 between 93.3% and 99.9%, except for hemicellulose), suggesting a strong genetic influence. Correlation analysis also revealed inverse relationships between protein content and fiber fractions and positive relationships with digestibility-related indices. Multivariate analyses revealed a clear separation between nutritional quality traits and structural fiber components, indicating consistent differentiation among populations. Overall, these results highlight the potential of local Dactylis glomerata populations as genetic resources for further evaluation in breeding and conservation programs under Mediterranean conditions.

1. Introduction

Dactylis glomerata L., commonly known as orchardgrass, is a long-lived grass species with wide distribution, recognized for its adaptability and forage quality [1,2]. It is commonly used in pastures and mixed grass-legume systems [3,4]. Orchardgrass provides high-quality forage with elevated crude protein content, moderate fiber levels, and good digestibility, making it a preferred species for ruminant nutrition [5,6,7,8]. Under specific pasture management conditions, grazing animals fed D. glomerata can exhibit improved liveweight gain and milk production compared to other grasses [9,10].
The nutritive value of D. glomerata is influenced by environmental conditions, plant maturity, and morphological traits such as leaf-to-stem ratio and tillering capacity. Key chemical and fiber constituents—including crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), neutral and acid detergent fibers (NDF and ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), cellulose, and hemicellulose—differ among genotypes and are also shaped by management practices, harvest stage, and environmental stresses [2,8,11,12,13]. Harvest at the vegetative stage produces higher CP and digestible dry matter (DDM), while fiber fractions increase with plant maturity [2]. Genetic variation among populations influences DDM, CP, and water-soluble carbohydrate content, indicating the existence of exploitable phenotypic diversity for forage quality traits [8,13]. Multi-environment testing is essential to evaluate the stability of these traits [12]. Given this variability, assessing local Greek populations is essential to identify genotypes with differential expression of nutritional and fiber traits under Mediterranean conditions.
In Greece, studies on orchardgrass have primarily focused on genetic, morphological, and agronomic traits of natural populations, whereas detailed information on how these traits vary under different environmental conditions is limited [14,15]. Previous research has investigated the effects of factors such as shade, water availability, and temperature on plant performance, including growth and dry matter production [14,15]. Research across Europe and the Mediterranean has shown high genetic variability and geographic structuring in D. glomerata populations, despite limited ploidy variation [11,13,15,16,17,18,19]. Genetic and phylogenetic analyses of subspecies reveal substantial diversity, emphasizing the need to consider subspecies variation in breeding and conservation programs [20,21].
Genetic variation influences several forage quality attributes, including growth traits and compositional parameters [13], while growth, persistence, and post-drought recovery differ among genotypes [11]. Maintaining consistent performance of these traits across different environments is important for pasture management, as understanding genotype × environment (G × E) interactions helps breeders identify genotypes that perform reliably under diverse conditions [22,23]. For instance, Greveniotis et al. [12] reported significant G × E interactions for digestible dry matter, intake of dry matter, and relative feed value, demonstrating how environmental factors shape genetic potential.
Standard analytical methods—including determination of CP, ash, CF, NDF, ADF, ADL, and derived indices such as DDM, DMI, and RFV—allow reliable comparisons across populations and provide insights into both nutritional and fiber traits, as these methods are widely used in forage quality assessment [24,25,26].
In Mediterranean regions, forage yields are often reduced due to drought, heat, and seasonal variations [12,27]. Under such conditions, the use of locally adapted germplasm is particularly important, as native populations are more likely to possess traits related to stress tolerance and stable performance [28,29]. Therefore, the evaluation of indigenous Dactylis glomerata populations is essential for identifying genotypes with improved adaptability and forage quality suitable for Mediterranean grazing systems.
Based on the observed genetic variability and potential genotype × environment (G × E) interactions among Dactylis glomerata populations, we hypothesized that local populations from different natural sites in the Trikala region would exhibit significant differences in chemical composition, fiber fractions, and overall forage quality, and that variation in trait expression would reflect underlying genetic diversity among populations. The present research focused on analyzing the chemical composition, fiber fractions, and forage quality of Dactylis glomerata populations from ten natural sites in the Trikala region, Greece, grown in experimental field plots under controlled management conditions, in order to assess phenotypic variation, genetic variability, and trait associations in forage quality characteristics among native populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Sampling of Seeds

Seeds of Dactylis glomerata were collected from natural populations in the Trikala region, Greece, during 2023, representing local autochthonous genotypes. Collection was conducted under authorization from the Ministry of Environment and Energy, according to Flora Research Permit Protocol No. ΥΠΕΝ/ΔΠΔ/129149/7625/10-01-2023 (ADA 6Ρ9Γ4653Π8-ΖΦΚ).
Seeds were harvested from multiple individuals per population to ensure genetic diversity while minimizing impact on natural populations. The primary aim of the collection was ex situ conservation and evaluation of autochthonous Greek populations with agronomic interest.
Collected seeds were stored under dry and cool conditions until sowing for the experiment. Table 1 summarizes the populations, collection dates, and locations of the harvested seeds. Although collections were conducted over a period from September to November, seeds were harvested at physiological maturity in each location, ensuring a comparable developmental stage among populations.

2.2. Experimental Design

2.2.1. Field Trials

The field experiment was initiated in late November 2023 in the Trikala region (39°55′ N, 21°46′ E, 120 m above sea level). Two successive growing periods were included to capture a wider range of environmental conditions, facilitating the evaluation of genotype performance and stability across environments.
A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications was employed. Each plot consisted of four rows, 2 m long, spaced 25 cm apart. Data were collected over two experimental years and analyzed both within individual years and as a combined dataset for statistical evaluation.

2.2.2. Soil Characteristics

The experimental soil was loamy, composed of 40% sand, 33% silt, and 27% clay. Key soil properties were: N–NO3 5.7 mg kg−1, P–Olsen 14.4 mg kg−1, K 175 mg kg−1, organic matter 1.8%, and CaCO3 8.48%.

2.2.3. Crop Management

Plots were sown at a rate of 15 kg ha−1, reflecting a typical plant density for Dactylis glomerata under field conditions, as suggested by previous studies [30]. Uniform and satisfactory stand establishment was achieved across all plots, ensuring comparable plant density and minimizing differences in plant competition among genotypes. Annual fertilization consisted of 150 kg N ha−1 and 80 kg P2O5 ha−1. In the first year, the entire phosphorus dose and 50 kg N ha−1 were applied before planting, with the remaining 100 kg N ha−1 split into four top-dressings of 25 kg N ha−1 each during the growing season, following rainfall or irrigation. In the second year, the same fertilization rates and top-dressing schedule were followed. All fertilizers were applied on the soil surface without incorporation. Weed and pest management were applied uniformly across all plots following local best practices. Irrigation was applied using a conventional sprinkler system, based on crop water requirements and prevailing weather conditions, in order to avoid water stress and maintain uniform growth across plots. Irrigation management was consistent across all treatments, ensuring uniform soil moisture conditions throughout the experimental period.

2.2.4. Climatic Data

Climatic conditions during the experimental periods were recorded to provide context for plant growth and to facilitate the interpretation of potential environmental effects on the evaluated traits. Average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures (°C) and total monthly precipitation (mm) for the experimental periods are presented in Figure 1.

2.3. Harvesting and Analyses

Plants were harvested at the boot stage (just prior to flowering) during spring 2024 and 2025 to balance high crude protein content with moderate fiber levels, ensuring optimal plant material for nutritional and fiber analyses. For each plot, the entire area was cut to 5 cm above ground; to reduce edge effects, only the central rows were collected and used as the experimental unit for statistical analyses of all chemical and fiber assessments. Analyses were carried out at the Laboratory of Animal Technology, University of Thessaly.
Dried samples were prepared according to standard AOAC procedures [31,32], oven-dried at controlled temperature conditions (IKA 125, IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany), and ground through a 1 mm sieve (Retsch ZM200, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) to ensure uniformity. Crude Protein (CP) was estimated from nitrogen content (N × 6.25) using the Kjeldahl method (AOAC 990.03) with a Gerhardt Kjeldatherm KT20s digestion block and Gerhardt Vapodest 300 distillation unit. Ash content was determined by incineration at 600 °C for 2 h (AOAC 942.05) and expressed as a percentage of dry matter. Crude Fiber (CF), representing cellulose and hemicellulose resistant to digestion, was measured through sequential acid and alkaline digestion (AOAC 978.10), with ash correction.
Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) were analyzed following Van Soest et al. [25] using a Velp FIWE Fiber Analyzer (VELP Scientifica, Usmate, Italy). Cellulose and hemicellulose contents were calculated as ADF minus ADL and NDF minus ADF, respectively [33].
Digestible Dry Matter (DDM, %) was calculated using the formula DDM = 88.9 − 0.779 × ADF (%), and Dry Matter Intake (DMI, % of body weight) as DMI = 120 ÷ NDF (%), in accordance with standard forage evaluation protocols [34,35]. Relative Feed Value (RFV) was subsequently derived as RFV = (DDM × DMI)/1.29 [34]. RFV categories provide a practical guide for livestock feeding: Class I (>151) for high-producing dairy cows, Class II (125–151) for good-quality dairy cows and young heifers, Class III (103–124) for beef cattle and older heifers, Class IV (87–102) for beef cattle and non-lactating cows, and Class V (75–86) for dry cows [34].
All measurements were conducted in triplicate per plot, and mean values were used for statistical analysis. Samples from each experimental year (2024 and 2025) were analyzed separately. For the combined analysis, mean values per plot and year were used as input in the statistical model, allowing the assessment of both environmental effects and genotype × environment interactions. This approach minimizes environmental and procedural variation, allowing a clearer assessment of genetic differences among populations.

2.4. Statistical Analyses and Trait Stability

All statistical analyses were carried out to explore variation and relationships among the evaluated forage quality traits. A combined ANOVA was performed for each trait, treating genotypes as fixed effects [36], using IBM SPSS v.31 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Mean comparisons were conducted using Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05, implemented in MSTAT-C (Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, v.2.10). Given the relatively small numerical differences observed among population means, results of the mean comparison test should be interpreted with caution, as statistically significant differences may not always reflect biologically meaningful variation.
To assess associations among traits, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and visualized in JMP Pro 18 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), with statistical significance evaluated at p < 0.05. To further explore overall patterns and relationships among traits and populations, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), network ordination, and two-way Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) were performed. For the HCA, data were standardized to account for differing scales, and Ward’s minimum variance method was applied using Euclidean distance as the proximity metric. Clustering relationships were visualized via a dual-axis heat map and dendrograms presented on a Distance Scale, complemented by a constellation plot to illustrate the structural arrangement and relative distances between clusters.
The Stability Index (SI) for each trait was calculated following Fasoula [37] as:
S I =   ( x ̄ / s ) 2
where x ̄ represents the mean value of the trait and s is the standard deviation, with higher values reflecting greater stability of the trait across different environments.
The Stability Index (SI) was then used to evaluate genotype stability based on the relationship between mean performance and variability, providing a simple and effective criterion for identifying stable genotypes, particularly in experiments with a limited number of environments.
Variance components were derived from the ANOVA mean squares according to McIntosh [38] and used to estimate broad-sense heritability (H2) following Johnson et al. [39] and Hanson et al. [40]. The phenotypic (PCV) and genotypic (GCV) coefficients of variation were calculated as described by Singh and Chaudhary [41] to assess the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to trait variability.
H 2 = σ g 2 σ g 2 + σ g x e 2 e + σ r e 2 r x e
GCV ( % ) = σ g 2 x ¯ × 100
PCV ( % ) = σ p 2 x ¯ × 100
For these calculations, genotypic variance, phenotypic variance, genotype × environment interaction variance, residual error variance, number of replications, number of environments, and overall mean were considered as σ g 2 , σ p 2 , σ g x e 2 , σ r e 2 , r, e, and x ¯ , respectively.

3. Results

Forage quality traits of ten Dactylis glomerata populations were evaluated over two consecutive years under controlled conditions to determine the effects of genotype, environment, and their interaction on chemical composition, fiber fractions, and derived indices (DDM, DMI, RFV).

3.1. Combined ANOVA

The combined ANOVA for Dactylis glomerata populations (Table 2) showed that genotypic effects were significant for all evaluated traits (p ≤ 0.001), including crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), and relative feed value (RFV). Environmental effects were also significant for all traits, although generally lower than those for genotypes, indicating that both genetic variation and environmental factors, including genotype × environment interaction, play an important role in determining forage quality. The genotype × environment interaction was significant for all traits, reflecting differential responses of genotypes across environments. Replications within environments were not significant for any trait.
These results highlight a strong genetic influence on forage quality traits, while also indicating substantial contributions of environmental factors and genotype × environment interactions. Replications nested within environments were not significant, indicating low experimental error and good field uniformity.

3.2. Stability of Forage Quality Traits

The Stability Index (SI) analysis for Dactylis glomerata populations (Table 3) revealed considerable variation in environmental stability among the evaluated populations. Certain populations, such as Kefalopotamos, and Filyra, exhibited high SI values for key nutritional traits—including digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV)— indicating high environmental stability (i.e., consistent performance across environments). In contrast, populations like Gorgogyri and Pialeia showed lower stability for several traits, greater sensitivity to environmental variation.
Similarly, crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) stability varied across populations, highlighting differences in how genotypes maintain quality traits under variable environmental conditions. Overall, these results suggest that some populations combine both superior forage quality and environmental stability, making them potential candidates for further evaluation in breeding programs; however, selection decisions should also consider additional agronomic traits such as dry matter yield and persistence.

3.3. Descriptive Statistics

The genetic parameter estimates for the Dactylis glomerata populations indicated strong genetic control over most of the assessed forage quality traits (Table 4). Crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), cellulose, digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV) generally exhibited high heritability, reflecting a predominant genetic influence. Hemicellulose showed moderate heritability, suggesting a greater environmental contribution.
These results suggest that selective breeding for improved nutritional and fiber quality traits in Dactylis glomerata populations is feasible. Populations with consistently high genetic values and stable performance across environments represent promising candidates for forage improvement and breeding programs.

3.4. Performance of Dactylis glomerata Populations Based on Duncan’s Multiple Range Test

Duncan’s multiple range test revealed significant differences among Dactylis glomerata populations for all evaluated forage quality traits (Table 5). Populations such as Kori and Xyloparoiko generally exhibited higher digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV), indicating superior overall forage quality, even though Kori had slightly higher crude protein (CP) than Xyloparoiko, and Palaiochori actually showed the highest CP.
In contrast, populations like Prodromos and Kato Rachi tended to show lower values across several traits, reflecting comparatively lower nutritional potential. These differences among populations were consistent across most quality parameters, suggesting stable patterns of variation rather than isolated trait effects.
These results highlight trends in forage quality among populations and suggest which genotypes may be promising candidates for further evaluation in breeding programs aimed at improving high-quality and stable forage, particularly when multi-trait performance is considered rather than single-trait selection, without overgeneralizing suitability based solely on a single trait.

3.5. Correlation Analysis of Forage Quality Traits in Dactylis glomerata Populations

Correlation analysis among forage quality traits revealed clear patterns linking chemical composition to nutritional indices (Figure 2). Crude protein (CP) was positively associated with digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV), while fiber fractions (CF, NDF, ADF, cellulose) were negatively associated with these nutritional traits. RFV was strongly associated with DDM and DMI, indicating that populations with higher protein and lower fiber generally provide better forage quality.
These patterns highlight the relationships among protein and fiber components and their impact on forage quality. Observed correlations are consistent with expectations and can inform selection strategies; interpretation of genetic influence should be considered alongside heritability results.

3.6. Principal Component Analysis of Forage Quality Variation in Dactylis glomerata Populations

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of forage quality traits explained 72.1% of the total variation, with PC1 accounting for 52.8% and PC2 for 19.3% (Figure 3). The score plot revealed a clear separation of populations into groups based on nutritional and fiber characteristics. Populations such as Xyloparoiko, Filyra, and Kori clustered on the positive side of PC1, associated with higher digestibility and feed value, whereas populations like Prodromos, Kefalopotamos, and Kato Rachi were positioned on the negative side, reflecting higher structural fiber content. Other populations occupied intermediate positions, indicating moderate forage quality.
The loading plot indicated that DMI, RFV, DDM, and CP were positively associated with PC1, while NDF, ADF, and cellulose were negatively associated. Thus, PC1 represents a gradient of forage quality, separating populations with higher nutritional value from those with higher fiber content. PC2 was mainly influenced by ADL and ash, highlighting additional variation in fiber composition and mineral content.
Overall, the PCA supports the identification of populations with superior forage quality, complementing the correlation and heritability analyses. Populations clustered on the positive side of PC1 can be considered promising candidates for selection in breeding programs aiming to improve digestibility and feed value in Dactylis glomerata.

3.7. Network Ordination of Forage Quality Relationships Among Dactylis glomerata Populations

The network ordination diagram (Figure 4) visualizes the similarity relationships among the ten Dactylis glomerata populations. Replicates of the same population formed distinct clusters, confirming the consistency of trait expression within populations. Populations such as Xyloparoiko and Kori grouped closely, reflecting high nutritional quality, whereas populations like Kato Rachi, Pialeia, and Kefalopotamos clustered together on the opposite side, associated with higher fiber content or intermediate forage quality.
This approach complements the correlation and PCA analyses by providing an intuitive visualization of overall population relationships, highlighting clusters of populations with similar forage profiles. Such patterns can inform the identification of superior or stable genotypes, as populations forming tight clusters with favorable traits may represent promising candidates for breeding programs.

3.8. Hierarchical Clustering of Forage Quality Traits in Dactylis glomerata Populations

Hierarchical clustering of forage quality traits (Figure 5) revealed two main clusters of variables: one including protein, hemicellulose, DDM, DMI, RFV, Ash, and ADL, and another consisting mainly of structural fiber components (CF, NDF, ADF, Cellulose).
Populations clustered according to overall trait profiles, with Xyloparoiko, Kori, and Filyra showing higher nutritional quality and lower fiber, while Prinos, Kefalopotamos, and Kato Rachi were associated with higher fiber content. The remaining populations displayed intermediate patterns.
These clusters complement the PCA and network ordination results by providing a clear grouping of populations based on combined trait performance. The identified patterns can help highlight populations with superior forage quality and stability for potential breeding selection.

4. Discussion

Considerable variation was observed among the ten Dactylis glomerata populations from the Trikala region in traits related to chemical composition, fiber fractions, and overall forage quality. Previous studies have documented substantial genotypic diversity in natural D. glomerata populations across Greece and other regions [15,42,43], providing a context for interpreting the observed differences. Such inherited variability provides a valuable foundation for future breeding programs, supporting the development of cultivars with enhanced nutritional value and stability under varying environmental conditions [44,45]. These patterns reflect the combined influence of genotypic potential and environmental responsiveness, indicating that populations differ in their nutritional profiles and in their response to environmental variability, highlighting relationships among traits and differentiation between populations.
Our combined ANOVA for Dactylis glomerata populations showed that genotypic effects were highly significant for all measured traits, including crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), digestible dry matter (DDM), and relative feed value (RFV). Environmental effects were also significant, although generally smaller than the genotypic effects, indicating that genotypic variability is a major determinant of forage quality. The genotype × environment interaction was significant across all traits, reflecting differential responses of populations under varying conditions. These findings support previous studies that emphasize the importance of genotypes and G × E interactions in maintaining stable forage quality in cocksfoot and other forage species [12,46,47,48,49].
High broad-sense heritability (H2 > 93% for most traits, Table 4) confirms that these forage quality traits—particularly crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and relative feed value (RFV)—are predominantly under genetic regulation and suggest strong potential for genetic improvement through selection. Hemicellulose, with moderate heritability (H2 = 65.2%), appears more influenced by environmental conditions, highlighting the importance of multi-environment evaluation [26,50]. These findings align with previous studies reporting high heritability for CP, NDF, ADF, and RFV in cocksfoot and other forage species [12,47], and traits with higher H2 observed in our study tended to show reduced environmental sensitivity and stronger inherited control compared with more plastic traits, indicating greater stability and predictability for selection [51,52,53]. Key traits, such as dry matter intake (DMI) and fiber fractions including NDF, are well-recognized parameters for evaluating forage quality and their potential impact on animal nutrition [25,54]. The relatively high heritability values observed here may also reflect the controlled experimental conditions and reduced environmental variability, as broad-sense heritability is defined as the ratio of genetic to total phenotypic variance, with lower environmental variation leading to higher estimates [55]. Overall, these results demonstrate that the measured forage quality traits in the studied Dactylis glomerata populations are under strong genotypic influence, while selection strategies should carefully consider environmental variability to optimize breeding efficiency. Heritability estimates should always be interpreted within the context of the experimental conditions under which they were obtained.
Populations Kori and Xyloparoiko consistently displayed higher values for key measured forage quality traits, including crude protein (CP), digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV), whereas Palaiochori was primarily characterized by its high CP content rather than overall performance across all traits. This distinction highlights that high protein content alone does not necessarily indicate superior forage quality, which is better captured by composite indices such as RFV. In contrast, populations such as Prodromos and Kato Rachi exhibited lower values for these nutritional traits. Stability Index analysis identified Kefalopotamos and Filyra as the most environmentally stable populations for DDM, DMI, and RFV, indicating consistent trait performance across diverse conditions. The use of SI in the present study provides a practical approach for preliminary evaluation of genotypes under variable environments. Although statistically significant differences among populations were detected, the relatively small numerical differences observed for several traits suggest limited biological differentiation under the experimental conditions. This may be partly attributed to the uniform crop management practices and relatively consistent environmental conditions across plots.
The observed variation in both quality and stability among populations is consistent with established knowledge on the inheritance of forage traits. Traits with high heritability, such as CP and RFV, tend to exhibit greater stability across environments, suggesting relatively simpler genetic control compared to more complex traits [48,56,57,58,59]. By contrast, more complex quantitative traits or those sensitive to environmental fluctuations, such as hemicellulose, exhibit lower Stability Index values and require evaluation across multiple environments for accurate selection [59,60,61,62]. Therefore, identifying populations that combine high-quality traits with environmental stability is critical for developing reliable cultivars suited to variable Mediterranean conditions.
Correlation analyses revealed strong associations among chemical composition, fiber fractions, and nutritional value. In particular, crude protein (CP) was positively correlated with digestible dry matter (DDM; r = 0.58 **) and relative feed value (RFV; r = 0.51 **), and negatively correlated with neutral detergent fiber (NDF; r = −0.36 **), acid detergent fiber (ADF; r = −0.58 **), and crude fiber (CF; r = −0.66 **). Similarly, RFV was strongly associated with DDM (r = 0.91 **) and dry matter intake (DMI; r = 0.92 **), indicating that populations with higher protein and lower fiber content exhibit improved nutritional indices. These patterns are consistent with previous studies on cocksfoot, where CP was generally negatively associated with fiber components, and DDM showed positive associations with quality traits [8,13,49,63]. Furthermore, research on ethnobotanically important grasses in Pakistan confirmed that protein content positively correlates with in vitro digestibility and negatively with fiber fractions, reinforcing the relevance of these traits for assessing forage nutritional quality [64]. The observed negative correlation between crude protein and fiber components (NDF and ADF) aligns with previous reports [26,65]. These relationships reflect the structural composition of the plant cell wall: NDF contributes to bulkiness, limiting dry matter intake due to rumen fill, while ADF is negatively related to digestibility. Acid detergent lignin (ADL) further restricts microbial degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose, reducing digestible dry matter (DDM) [65]. Together, these mechanisms explain the strong associations observed between fiber fractions and forage quality indices.
The observed trait correlations support targeted selection strategies: increasing CP while reducing NDF and ADF can simultaneously enhance digestibility and feed value. Populations exhibiting this combination, such as Palaiochori and Kori, represent valuable genetic material for future quality-focused selection and germplasm evaluation, rather than direct agronomic recommendation.
Multivariate analyses further supported the relationships observed in the correlation analysis. Principal component analysis, network ordination, and hierarchical clustering each contributed complementary insights into the relationships among traits, collectively highlighting a separation between forage quality traits and structural fiber fractions across the studied Dactylis glomerata populations. Traits associated with higher nutritional value, including crude protein (CP), digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), and relative feed value (RFV), were grouped together and positioned opposite to fiber-related traits such as neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and cellulose. This pattern reflects the well-established trade-off between forage digestibility and structural fiber accumulation in grasses, where increased cell-wall components generally reduce intake potential and nutritional value. The limiting role of cell-wall concentration and lignification on forage digestibility and intake has been widely documented in ruminant nutrition studies [26,65]. Furthermore, variation in forage quality traits among populations may reflect both environmental influences and underlying genotypic effects, which are known to affect the nutritional characteristics of forage species [66]. Similar patterns of population differentiation and genetic variability have been reported in orchardgrass germplasm studies, highlighting the importance of natural populations as valuable genetic resources for forage improvement [20,67]. Moreover, the consistent grouping of populations Xyloparoiko, Filyra, and Kori across the PCA, network ordination, and hierarchical clustering analyses suggests a stable pattern of differentiation associated with higher forage quality traits. The convergence of these independent multivariate approaches strengthens the reliability of the observed relationships among traits and populations.
The high genotypic variance and heritability across traits suggest strong potential for selection and genetic improvement. Populations with superior nutritional quality and stability, such as Kefalopotamos, Filyra, Palaiochori, and Xyloparoiko, may serve as potential parental material in preliminary breeding or selection programs focused on forage quality improvement, rather than immediate cultivar development. Moreover, knowledge of population-specific trait stability allows the recommendation of particular genotypes for further experimental evaluation under multi-environment trials.
The study also demonstrates the utility of combined evaluation of both chemical composition and fiber fractions. By integrating SI, heritability, and trait correlations, breeders can select genotypes that optimize both nutritional quality and environmental resilience, improving forage availability and livestock performance.
From a breeding perspective, the combination of high crude protein and low fiber content (particularly NDF) is desirable, as it improves both digestibility and intake. However, selection based solely on nutritional quality may lead to trade-offs with yield and persistence, suggesting that balanced selection strategies are required.
Although dry matter yield is an important parameter in forage evaluation, the present study focuses specifically on forage quality traits in order to assess the genetic variability and phenotypic differentiation in nutritional traits among autochthonous Dactylis glomerata populations. In forage production systems, nutritional quality plays a critical role, particularly in ruminant feeding, where parameters such as crude protein, digestibility, and intake directly influence animal performance [26,54]. Moreover, forage quality and biomass yield are often not positively correlated, and may involve trade-offs, as negative or weak genetic correlations between dry matter yield and quality traits have been reported in forage grasses [13,51]. This highlights the importance of evaluating these components separately. Therefore, the results of this study provide valuable information on the variability of forage quality traits, while further research integrating yield and persistence would allow a more comprehensive agronomic evaluation.
In Mediterranean grazing systems, where environmental variability is high, the selection of genotypes that combine acceptable forage quality with stability across environments is particularly important. Populations identified as both high-performing and stable in this study may be suitable for use in low-input or stress-prone environments as genetic resources for future selection efforts.
In conclusion, Dactylis glomerata populations from the Trikala region exhibit considerable genetic variation for key forage quality traits. Populations such as Palaiochori, Xyloparoiko, Kori, Kefalopotamos, and Filyra demonstrated relatively high nutritional value and trait stability, indicating potential interest for further evaluation in germplasm conservation and quality-oriented breeding research. These findings provide a basis for assessing local germplasm and highlight the importance of conserving native populations as a resource for sustainable livestock production and future cultivar development, while acknowledging that additional studies on yield and field performance are needed to fully support practical applications.

5. Conclusions

Analysis of ten native Dactylis glomerata populations from the Trikala region revealed marked differences in chemical composition, fiber fractions, and overall forage quality. Populations such as Kori and Xyloparoiko exhibited higher values in several quality traits, while Filyra and Kefalopotamos were distinguished by higher environmental stability. Palaiochori was mainly characterized by high crude protein content rather than consistently superior performance across all traits.
High broad-sense heritability for key traits—including crude protein, fiber fractions, digestible dry matter, and relative feed value—indicates a strong genetic component underlying forage quality variation. Correlation analyses highlighted consistent relationships between protein content, fiber composition, and digestibility. Multivariate analyses further confirmed the differentiation among populations and the separation between nutritional and structural traits.
These results highlight substantial genetic variability among native populations and support their value as germplasm resources for future studies focused on forage quality traits and breeding programs targeting improved performance and adaptability.
Further evaluation of these populations—including yield, persistence, and multi-environment field performance—is required for comprehensive agronomic evaluation under diverse conditions and for identifying superior genotypes for practical forage production systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.G.; methodology, V.G.; investigation, V.G., C.G.I., D.K. and E.B.; statistical analysis, A.S. and V.G., writing—original draft preparation, V.G., E.B. and C.G.I.; writing—review and editing, V.G., E.B. and A.S.; visualization, A.S. and V.G.; supervision, V.G.; project administration, V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Environment and Energy for permitting the collection of autochthonous Dactylis glomerata populations in the Trikala region, Greece.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Qiao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, X.; Li, M.; Cai, K.; Luo, H.; Zeng, B. Transcriptome analysis on responses of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) leaves to a short term flooding. Hereditas 2020, 157, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mir, N.H.; Ahmad, S.; Bhat, S.S. Orchard Grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Yield and Nutritive Characteristics in Response to Different Cutting Regimes in a Temperate Region. Range Manag. Agrofor. 2024, 45, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maldonado Peralta, M.D.L.Á.; Rojas García, A.R.; Torres Salado, N.; Herrera Pérez, J.; Joaquín Cancino, S.; Ventura Ríos, J.; Hernández Garay, A.; Hernández Guzmán, F.J. Productivity of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) alone and associated with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2017, 46, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Nyfeler, D.; Huguenin-Elie, O.; Suter, M.; Frossard, E.; Lüscher, A. Grass-legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 140, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peri, P.L.; Lucas, R.J.; Moot, D.J. Dry matter production, morphology and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata growing under different light regimes. Agrofor. Syst. 2007, 70, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gürsoy, E.; Kaya, A.; Gül, M. Determining the nutrient content, energy, and in vitro true digestibility of some grass forage plants. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2021, 33, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Coblentz, W.K.; Akins, M.S.; Cavadini, J.S. Fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of baled grass silages made from meadow fescue, tall fescue, or an orchardgrass cultivar exhibiting a unique nonflowering growth response. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 3219–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Farshadfar, M. Diversity and relationships of yield and quality traits in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) genotypes. J. Rangel. Sci. 2017, 7, 210–219. [Google Scholar]
  9. González, P.; Astigarraga, L. Productivity of Dairy Cows in Pastures of Tall Fescue or Dactylis. Agrociencia Urug. 2012, 16, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gareli, M.S.; Mendoza, A.; Bello, N.M.; Lattanzi, F.A.; Fariña, S.R.; Savian, J.V. Effects of grazing management and concentrate supplementation on intake and milk production of dairy cows grazing orchardgrass. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2023, 301, 115668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bakhtiari, M.A.; Saeidnia, F.; Majidi, M.M.; Mirlohi, A. Growth traits associated with drought survival, recovery and persistence of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) under prolonged drought treatments. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Skendi, A.; Korkovelos, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Stability of Forage Quality Traits in Artificial Meadows Across Greek Environments. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jafari, A.; Naseri, H. Genetic variation and correlation among yield and quality traits in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 145, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abraham, E.M.; Kyriazopoulos, A.P.; Parissi, Z.M.; Kostopoulou, P.; Karatassiou, M.; Anjalanidou, K.; Katsouta, C. Growth, Dry Matter Production, Phenotypic Plasticity, and Nutritive Value of Three Natural Populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under Various Shading Treatments. Agrofor. Syst. 2014, 88, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Madesis, P.; Abraham, E.M.; Kalivas, A.; Ganopoulos, I.; Tsaftaris, A. Genetic diversity and structure of natural Dactylis glomerata L. populations revealed by morphological and microsatellite–based (SSR/ISSR) markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 2014, 13, 4226–4240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hodkinson, T.R.; Perdereau, A.; Klaas, M.; Cormican, P.; Barth, S. Genotyping by Sequencing and Plastome Analysis Finds High Genetic Variability and Geographical Structure in Dactylis glomerata L. in Northwest Europe Despite Lack of Ploidy Variation. Agronomy 2019, 9, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, L.F.; Zhang, X.Q.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.K.; Xie, W.G.; Ma, Y.M.; Zhao, Y.F. Identification of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars by using simple sequence repeat markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 2013, 12, 5111–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, X.; Feng, G.; Li, P.; Yu, S.; Hao, F.; Nie, G.; Huang, L.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide association analysis reveals the function of DgSAUR71 in plant height improvement. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chtourou-Ghorbel, N.; Guenni, K.; Bedoui, M.; Chadded, H.; Sai-Kachout, S.; Trifi-Farah, N. Genetic and phenological diversity of Tunisian natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2024, 71, 3471–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Last, L.; Widmer, F.; Fjellstad, W.; Stoyanova, S.; Kölliker, R. Genetic Diversity of Natural Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Populations in Three Regions in Europe. BMC Genet. 2013, 14, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, D.; Zhao, X.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.; Zhang, X. Phylogenetic and Diversity Analysis of Dactylis glomerata Subspecies Using SSR and IT-ISJ Markers. Molecules 2016, 21, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Robins, J.G.; Rigby, C.W.; Jensen, K.B. Genotype × Environment Interaction Patterns in Rangeland Variety Trials of Cool-Season Grasses in the Western United States. Agronomy 2020, 10, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yadesa, L. Review on genetic-environmental interaction (GxE) and its application in crop breeding. Int. J. Res. Agron. 2022, 5, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fenetahun, Y.; You, Y.; Fentahun, T.; Xinwen, X.; Yong-Dong, W. Effects of grazing intensity on forage nutritive value of dominant grass species in Borana rangelands of Southern Ethiopia. PeerJ. 2001, 9, e12204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 7, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Soest, P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1994; p. 476. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lelièvre, F.; Seddaiu, G.; Ledda, L.; Porqueddu, C.; Volaire, F. Water use efficiency and drought survival in Mediterranean perennial forage grasses. Field Crops Res. 2011, 121, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Annicchiarico, P.; Pecetti, L.; Abdelguerfi, A.; Bouzerzour, H.; Kallida, R.; Porqueddu, C.; Simões, N.M.; Volaire, F. Optimal forage grass germplasm for drought-prone Mediterranean environments. Field Crops Res. 2013, 148, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nichols, P.G.; Norton, M. Improvement of pasture and forage legumes and grasses for Mediterranean climate zones. Options Méditerr. Série A. Ecosyst. Serv. Socio-Econ. Benefits Mediterr. Grassl. 2016, 114, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yfoulis, A. Field Crops III; Organization for Educational Publications: Athens, Greece, 1998; p. 216. [Google Scholar]
  31. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 21st ed.; Oxford University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC): Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hindrichsen, I.K.; Kreuzer, M.; Madsen, J.; Bach Knudsen, K.E. Fiber and lignin analysis in concentrate, forage, and feces: Detergent versus enzymatic-chemical method. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2168–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Linn, J.G.; Martin, N.P. Forage Quality Tests and Interpretation; MN AG-FO-02637; University of Minnesota Extension Service: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  35. Moore, J.E.; Undersander, D. Relative Forage Quality: An Alternative to Relative Feed Value and Quality Index. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, Gainesville, FL, USA, 11–12 January 2002; pp. 16–32. [Google Scholar]
  36. Steel, R.G.D.; Torrie, H.; Dickey, D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1997; p. 666. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fasoula, V.A. Prognostic Breeding: A new paradigm for crop improvement. In Plant Breeding Reviews; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 37, pp. 297–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McIntosh, M.S. Analysis of Combined Experiments. Agron. J. 1983, 75, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Johnson, H.W.; Robinson, H.E.; Comstock, R.E. Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J. 1955, 47, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hanson, G.; Robinson, H.F.; Comstock, R.E. Biometrical studies on yield in segregating population of Korean Lespedeza. Agron. J. 1956, 48, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Singh, R.K.; Chaudhary, B.D. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis; Kalyani Publishers: New Delhi, India, 1977; p. 304. [Google Scholar]
  42. Altaf, M.T.; Cavagnaro, P.F.; Kökten, K.; Ali, A.; Morales, A.; Tatar, M.; Baloch, F.S. Genotyping-by-sequencing derived SNP markers reveal genetic diversity and population structure of Dactylis glomerata germplasm. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1530585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xie, W.G.; Lu, X.F.; Zhang, X.Q.; Huang, L.K.; Cheng, L. Genetic Variation and Comparison of Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Cultivars and Wild Accessions as Revealed by SSR Markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 2012, 11, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Robins, J.G.; Bushman, B.S.; Jensen, K.B. Agronomic Evaluation of the Results of Selection within Late-Maturing Dactylis glomerata Populations. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Casler, M. Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value. Adv. Agron. 2001, 71, 51–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Colas, V.; Barre, P.; van Parijs, F.; Wolters, L.; Quitté, Y.; Ruttink, T.; Roldán-Ruiz, I.; Escobar Gutiérrez, A.J.; Muylle, H. Seasonal differences in structural and genetic control of digestibility in perennial ryegrass. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 801145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. da Fonseca, C.E.L.; Carvalho, M.A.; Pessoa-Filho, M.; Ramos, A.K.B.; Karia, C.T.; Braga, G.J.; Maciel, N.B.A.; Tameirão, S.N.D. Genetic Variability, Heritability, and Expected Gains for Yield and Forage Quality in Gamba Grass (Andropogon gayanus) Populations. Grasses 2025, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Skendi, A.; Korkovelos, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Evaluation and Stability of Red and White Trifolium Species for Nutritional Quality in a Mediterranean Environment. Agriculture 2025, 15, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tarakanovas, P.; Kanapeckas, J.; Lemežienė, N. Studies of intertrait correlations in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). Žemdirbystė 2006, 93, 306–313. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sanada, Y.; Takai, T.; Yamada, T. Inheritance of the concentration of water-soluble carbohydrates and its relationship with the concentrations of fibre and crude protein in herbage of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). Grass Forage Sci. 2007, 62, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Annicchiarico, P.; Romani, M. Genetic Variation, Heritability and Genetic Correlations for Forage Quality and Yield Traits of Mediterranean Tall Fescue Germplasm. Plant Breed. 2008, 124, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Becker, H.; Leon, J. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 1988, 101, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, C.S.; Binns, M.R. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar × location data. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1988, 68, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ball, D.; Collins, M.; Lacefield, G.; Martin, N.; Mertens, D.; Olson, K.; Putnam, D.; Undersander, D.; Wolf, M. Understanding Forage Quality; Publication 1-01; American Farm Bureau Federation: Park Ridge, IL, USA, 2001; Available online: https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/forage/files/2017/04/FQ.pdf (accessed on 4 March 2026).
  55. Falconer, D.S.; Mackay, T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th ed.; Addison Wesley Longman: Harlow, UK, 1996; p. 464. [Google Scholar]
  56. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Zotis, S.; Korkovelos, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction Analysis for Quantity and Quality Traits in Faba Beans Using AMMI, GGE Models, and Stability Indices. Plants 2023, 12, 3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Zotis, S.; Korkovelos, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. A Comparative Study on Stability of Seed Characteristics in Vetch and Pea Cultivations. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Zotis, S.; Korkovelos, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Stability Dynamics of Main Qualitative Traits in Maize Cultivations across Diverse Environments regarding Soil Characteristics and Climate. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fasoulas, A.C. The Honeycomb Methodology of Plant Breeding; Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: Thessaloniki, Greece, 1988; p. 168. [Google Scholar]
  60. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Skendi, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Evaluating Wheat Seed Quality: Performance, Stability, and Genetic Control Across Six Greek Environments Using Multiple Selection Designs. Agriculture 2026, 16, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Skendi, A.; Zotis, S.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Genetic Control, Stability, and Multivariate Analysis of Wheat Seed Quality Traits in Elite Pure Lines Under Mediterranean Environments. Agriculture 2026, 16, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Zotis, S.; Korkovelos, A.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Assessment of Interactions between Yield Components of Common Vetch Cultivars in Both Conventional and Low-Input Cultivation Systems. Agriculture 2021, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Farshadfar, M. Evaluation of the Forage Yield and Quality in Some Accessions of Dactylis glomerata under Irrigated Conditions. Sch. Res. Libr. 2012, 3, 6. [Google Scholar]
  64. Harun, N.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Shaheen, S.; Ahmad, M.; Sahan, Z.; Bashir, H. Connecting nutritional facts with the traditional ranking of ethnobotanically used fodder grasses by local farmers in Central Punjab of Pakistan. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jung, H.G.; Allen, M.S. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 2774–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Buxton, D.R. Quality-Related Characteristics of Forages as Influenced by Plant Environment and Agronomic Factors. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 1996, 59, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zeng, B.; Zhang, X.; Lan, Y.; Yang, W.-Y. Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Relationships in Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Germplasm Based on SRAP Markers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 88, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures (°C) and total precipitation (mm) during the experimental periods, providing context for plant growth and interpretation of environmental effects.
Figure 1. Average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures (°C) and total precipitation (mm) during the experimental periods, providing context for plant growth and interpretation of environmental effects.
Agriculture 16 01132 g001
Figure 2. Correlation matrix showing relationships among forage quality traits in Dactylis glomerata populations. The upper triangle displays the Pearson correlation coefficients among CP, Ash, Fiber (CF), NDF, ADF, ADL, Hemicellulose, Cellulose, DDM, DMI (% bw), and RFV. The lower triangle shows scatterplots of all pairwise trait combinations with black points (dots), overlaid with fitted red regression lines and 95% confidence ellipses (pink areas), highlighting the patterns, trends, and clustering among the populations collected from the Trikala region.
Figure 2. Correlation matrix showing relationships among forage quality traits in Dactylis glomerata populations. The upper triangle displays the Pearson correlation coefficients among CP, Ash, Fiber (CF), NDF, ADF, ADL, Hemicellulose, Cellulose, DDM, DMI (% bw), and RFV. The lower triangle shows scatterplots of all pairwise trait combinations with black points (dots), overlaid with fitted red regression lines and 95% confidence ellipses (pink areas), highlighting the patterns, trends, and clustering among the populations collected from the Trikala region.
Agriculture 16 01132 g002
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot of forage quality traits measured in Dactylis glomerata populations collected from different locations in the Trikala region, Greece. Populations correspond to Palaiochori (G1), Gorgogyri (G2), Xyloparoiko (G3), Prinos (G4), Pialeia (G5), Prodromos (G6), Filyra (G7), Kefalopotamos (G8), Kori (G9), and Kato Rachi–Neromylos (G10). The first two principal components explain 52.8% and 19.3% of the total variance, respectively.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot of forage quality traits measured in Dactylis glomerata populations collected from different locations in the Trikala region, Greece. Populations correspond to Palaiochori (G1), Gorgogyri (G2), Xyloparoiko (G3), Prinos (G4), Pialeia (G5), Prodromos (G6), Filyra (G7), Kefalopotamos (G8), Kori (G9), and Kato Rachi–Neromylos (G10). The first two principal components explain 52.8% and 19.3% of the total variance, respectively.
Agriculture 16 01132 g003
Figure 4. Network ordination diagram illustrating the relationships among samples of ten Dactylis glomerata populations collected in the Trikala region, Greece. Each point represents an individual sample originating from the populations Palaiochori (G1), Gorgogyri (G2), Xyloparoiko (G3), Prinos (G4), Pialeia (G5), Prodromos (G6), Filyra (G7), Kefalopotamos (G8), Kori (G9), and Kato Rachi (Neromylos) (G10). Lines represent similarity-based connections among samples, highlighting the clustering patterns among populations.
Figure 4. Network ordination diagram illustrating the relationships among samples of ten Dactylis glomerata populations collected in the Trikala region, Greece. Each point represents an individual sample originating from the populations Palaiochori (G1), Gorgogyri (G2), Xyloparoiko (G3), Prinos (G4), Pialeia (G5), Prodromos (G6), Filyra (G7), Kefalopotamos (G8), Kori (G9), and Kato Rachi (Neromylos) (G10). Lines represent similarity-based connections among samples, highlighting the clustering patterns among populations.
Agriculture 16 01132 g004
Figure 5. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of forage quality traits measured in Dactylis glomerata populations from the Trikala region, Greece. Rows represent individual samples from the populations Palaiochori (G1), Gorgogyri (G2), Xyloparoiko (G3), Prinos (G4), Pialeia (G5), Prodromos (G6), Filyra (G7), Kefalopotamos (G8), Kori (G9), and Kato Rachi–Neromylos (G10), while columns correspond to the measured traits. Colors represent standardized values (red = higher values, grey= medium values, blue = lower values). Dendrograms indicate hierarchical clustering of both samples and variables.
Figure 5. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of forage quality traits measured in Dactylis glomerata populations from the Trikala region, Greece. Rows represent individual samples from the populations Palaiochori (G1), Gorgogyri (G2), Xyloparoiko (G3), Prinos (G4), Pialeia (G5), Prodromos (G6), Filyra (G7), Kefalopotamos (G8), Kori (G9), and Kato Rachi–Neromylos (G10), while columns correspond to the measured traits. Colors represent standardized values (red = higher values, grey= medium values, blue = lower values). Dendrograms indicate hierarchical clustering of both samples and variables.
Agriculture 16 01132 g005
Table 1. Collection sites and dates of Dactylis glomerata populations in the Trikala region.
Table 1. Collection sites and dates of Dactylis glomerata populations in the Trikala region.
GenusSpeciesMaterial Ex SituCollection DatePrefectureLocation
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds22 September 2023TrikalaPalaiochori, former Municipality of Pialeia (G1)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds25 October 2023TrikalaGorgogyri (G2)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds31 October 2023TrikalaXyloparoiko (G3)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds1 November 2023TrikalaPrinos (G4)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds9 November 2023TrikalaPialeia (G5)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds14 November 2023TrikalaProdromos (G6)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds16 November 2023TrikalaFilyra (G7)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds21 November 2023TrikalaKefalopotamos (G8)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds23 November 2023TrikalaKori (G9)
DactylisD. glomerataSeeds29 November 2023TrikalaKato Rachi (Neromylos) (G10)
Table 2. Combined ANOVA for Dactylis glomerata populations. Traits include crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). Significance of population, environment, and their interaction is shown for each trait.
Table 2. Combined ANOVA for Dactylis glomerata populations. Traits include crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). Significance of population, environment, and their interaction is shown for each trait.
Source of
Variation
CPAshCFNDFADFADLHemicelluloseCelluloseDDMDMI
(% BW)
RFV
m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.m.s.
Environment (E)1.200 ***0.553 ***0.008 ***0.450 ***0.412 ***0.012 ***1.723 ***0.281 ***0.250 ***0.001 ***0.157 ***
REPS/
Environments
0.001 ns0.001 ns0.0005 ns0.0002 ns0.0002 ns0.0002 ns0.0003 ns0.0005 ns0.0002 ns0.000001 ns0.0003 ns
Genotype (G)8.760 ***3.792 ***6.368 ***3.939 ***6.691 ***0.195 ***2.756 ***6.651 ***4.061 ***0.005 ***41.498 ***
Environment × Genotype (E × G)0.003 ***0.002 ***0.297 ***0.243 ***0.238 ***0.008 ***0.960 ***0.246 ***0.144 ***0.0003 ***0.076 ***
Error0.0010.00040.00030.00050.00040.00030.0010.0010.00020.0000010.003
Probability levels: *** p ≤ 0.001; ns—not significant; m.s.: mean squares.
Table 3. Stability Index (SI) values for Dactylis glomerata populations, including crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, and digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). Higher SI values indicate that a population maintains more consistent trait performance under varying environmental conditions.
Table 3. Stability Index (SI) values for Dactylis glomerata populations, including crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, and digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). Higher SI values indicate that a population maintains more consistent trait performance under varying environmental conditions.
PopulationCPAshCFNDFADFADLHemicelluloseCelluloseDDMDMI
(% bw)
RFV
Palaiochori8318465815,18788,83022,7995341372728,74482,00286,24494,365
Gorgogyri7741438215,86881,06030,5236405440217,28787,94580,75889,280
Xyloparoiko13,225640217,13687,64525,4865129411531,79589,47386,51991,106
Prinos8035615719,39793,97930,7205990406117,64289,78993,16992,392
Pialeia9499620525,22080,10733,6406618430818,85489,95476,40389,170
Prodromos11,312663520,49082,76528,6067230393834,21791,42679,90690,322
Filyra9326714719,98591,33228,9466372451015,43694,56891,68791,031
Kefalopotamos13,094753218,67293,48330,1928611393734,38095,16392,63893,898
Kori10,745931023,73483,29031,1377608483830,34197,72582,37789,045
Kato Rachi11,626748425,61586,50828,8558200411433,51792,10483,68490,861
Table 4. Genetic parameter estimates for Dactylis glomerata populations, including crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, and digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). The table presents minimum (Min), maximum (Max), mean, standard deviation (SD), genotypic variance ( σ g 2 ), phenotypic variance ( σ p 2 ), genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV %), phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %), and broad-sense heritability (H2%). These parameters reflect genetic contributions to trait variation and may be useful to identify populations with superior nutritional and fiber qualities suitable for breeding programs.
Table 4. Genetic parameter estimates for Dactylis glomerata populations, including crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, and digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). The table presents minimum (Min), maximum (Max), mean, standard deviation (SD), genotypic variance ( σ g 2 ), phenotypic variance ( σ p 2 ), genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV %), phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %), and broad-sense heritability (H2%). These parameters reflect genetic contributions to trait variation and may be useful to identify populations with superior nutritional and fiber qualities suitable for breeding programs.
TraitsMin.Max.MeanSD σ g 2 σ p 2 GCV (%)PCV (%)H2 (%)
CP11.6114.9713.2751.0071.09461.0957.88137.882799.97
Ash6.168.377.2590.6630.47380.47409.48189.484399.95
CF26.1128.7927.4750.8720.75890.79603.17073.247395.34
NDF56.1158.6357.4180.6950.46200.49241.18381.222193.83
ADF30.7233.8932.5020.8920.80660.83642.76332.813896.44
ADL2.903.503.14100.1530.02340.02444.86794.970995.90
Hemicellulose23.6126.1224.9160.6680.22450.34451.90172.355765.17
Cellulose27.7330.8329.3610.8890.80060.83143.04753.105596.30
DDM62.5064.9763.5810.6950.48960.50761.10051.120696.45
DMI (% BW)2.052.1392.0900.0250.000580.00621.15541.195993.34
RFV99.97106.54103.0332.1775.17785.18732.20842.210599.82
Table 5. Mean comparison of Dactylis glomerata populations based on Duncan’s multiple range test for crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, and digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). This approach allowed identification of significant differences among populations and highlighted genotypes with superior forage quality potential. Values represent means across two experimental years (combined analysis).
Table 5. Mean comparison of Dactylis glomerata populations based on Duncan’s multiple range test for crude protein (CP), ash, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), hemicellulose, cellulose, and digestible dry matter (DDM) (all expressed as %), dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight), and relative feed value (RFV). This approach allowed identification of significant differences among populations and highlighted genotypes with superior forage quality potential. Values represent means across two experimental years (combined analysis).
PopulationCPAshCFNDFADFADLHemicelluloseCelluloseDDMDMI
(% bw)
RFV
Palaiochori14.98 a7.875 b26.63 h57.23 g32.45 f3.245 c24.78 f29.21 f63.62 e2.097 c103.4 c
Gorgogyri13.50 e7.451 e26.98 g57.96 c32.29 g3.055 f25.67 b29.24 f63.74 d2.070 f102.3 d
Xyloparoiko13.04 f7.267 f27.45 e56.31 i31.51 i2.951 h24.80 f28.56 g64.36 b2.131 a106.3 a
Prinos12.30 h6.412 i27.20 f57.27 f33.30 c3.040 f23.97 g30.26 b62.96 h2.095 d102.3 d
Pialeia12.82 g6.821 g28.12 d57.72 d32.70 e3.149 d25.02 de29.55 e63.43 f2.079 e102.2 e
Prodromos13.82 d7.836 c26.50 i58.43 a33.42 b3.340 b25.02 e30.08 c62.87 i2.054 h100.1 h
Filyra14.08 c8.267 a28.42 c56.7 h31.65 h3.440 a25.05 d28.21 h64.25 c2.116 b105.4 b
Kefalopotamos12.11 i7.734 d28.57 b57.7 e33.70 a3.048 f24.00 g30.65 a62.65 j2.080 e101.0 f
Kori14.55 b6.241 j26.29 j56.68 h30.93 j3.012 g25.76 a27.91 i64.81 a2.117 b106.4 a
Kato Rachi11.74 j6.685 h28.60 a58.18 b33.08 d3.128 e25.10 c29.95 d63.13 g2.063 g100.9 g
Different letters within each column indicate statistically significant differences among population means based on Duncan’s multiple range test at p ≤ 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Greveniotis, V.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Skendi, A.; Kantas, D.; Ipsilandis, C.G. Nutritional and Fiber Quality Assessment of Native Greek Dactylis glomerata Populations. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111132

AMA Style

Greveniotis V, Bouloumpasi E, Skendi A, Kantas D, Ipsilandis CG. Nutritional and Fiber Quality Assessment of Native Greek Dactylis glomerata Populations. Agriculture. 2026; 16(11):1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Greveniotis, Vasileios, Elisavet Bouloumpasi, Adriana Skendi, Dimitrios Kantas, and Constantinos G. Ipsilandis. 2026. "Nutritional and Fiber Quality Assessment of Native Greek Dactylis glomerata Populations" Agriculture 16, no. 11: 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111132

APA Style

Greveniotis, V., Bouloumpasi, E., Skendi, A., Kantas, D., & Ipsilandis, C. G. (2026). Nutritional and Fiber Quality Assessment of Native Greek Dactylis glomerata Populations. Agriculture, 16(11), 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop