Next Article in Journal
Intraocular Inflammation Control and Changes in Retinal and Choroidal Architecture in Refractory Non-Infectious Uveitis Patients after Adalimumab Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and the Long-Term Risk for Glucose Intolerance and Overweight in the Offspring: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteriuria as a Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia. Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study
Article

Multidisciplinary Group Education for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

1
Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
2
Nursing and Midwifery Research Group, Brussel Health Campus, University Hospital Brussel, Brussels 1000, Belgium
3
Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(2), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020509
Received: 16 January 2020 / Revised: 30 January 2020 / Accepted: 11 February 2020 / Published: 13 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus)
The value of diabetes education, focusing on lifestyle measures, in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is acknowledged, but requires intensive education and input of resources if done on an individual basis. Group education could be a valuable alternative to individual education. This study aims to investigate the impact of multidisciplinary group education on women’s knowledge about GDM, education, treatment satisfaction, and emotional status. Two hundred women with GDM were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Dutch speaking women were offered group education at their first visit after GDM diagnosis. Non-Dutch speaking women or women for whom group education was not possible received individual education. Individual follow-up with a dietitian was planned within two weeks for all women. Women receiving individual education (n = 100) were more often from an ethnic minority background compared to women in group education (n = 100) (32.0% (n = 31) vs. 15.3% (n = 15), p = 0.01). Knowledge about GDM significantly improved after education, with few differences between the two education settings. Both patients in group and individual education were equally satisfied with the content and duration of the initial and follow-up education. Of all group participants, 91.8% (n = 90) were satisfied with group size (on average three participants) and 76.5% (n = 75) found that group education fulfilled their expectations. In conclusion, women diagnosed with GDM were overall satisfied with the education session’s content leading to a better understanding of their condition, independent of the education setting. Group education is a valuable alternative to better manage the increasing workload and is perceived as an added value by GDM patients. View Full-Text
Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus; treatment; education; group education gestational diabetes mellitus; treatment; education; group education
MDPI and ACS Style

Minschart, C.; Amuli, K.; Delameillieure, A.; Calewaert, P.; Mathieu, C.; Benhalima, K. Multidisciplinary Group Education for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020509

AMA Style

Minschart C, Amuli K, Delameillieure A, Calewaert P, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Multidisciplinary Group Education for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(2):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minschart, Caro, Kelly Amuli, Anouk Delameillieure, Peggy Calewaert, Chantal Mathieu, and Katrien Benhalima. 2020. "Multidisciplinary Group Education for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 2: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020509

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop