Management of Coagulopathy in Bleeding Patients

Early recognition of coagulopathy is necessary for its prompt correction and successful management. Novel approaches, such as point-of-care testing (POC) and administration of coagulation factor concentrates (CFCs), aim to tailor the haemostatic therapy to each patient and thus reduce the risks of over- or under-transfusion. CFCs are an effective alternative to ratio-based transfusion therapies for the correction of different types of coagulopathies. In case of major bleeding or urgent surgery in patients treated with vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) can effectively reverse the effects of the anticoagulant drug. Evidence for PCC effectiveness in the treatment of direct oral anticoagulants-associated bleeding is also increasing and PCC is recommended in guidelines as an alternative to specific reversal agents. In trauma-induced coagulopathy, fibrinogen concentrate is the preferred first-line treatment for hypofibrinogenaemia. Goal-directed coagulation management algorithms based on POC results provide guidance on how to adjust the treatment to the needs of the patient. When POC is not available, concentrate-based management can be guided by other parameters, such as blood gas analysis, thus providing an important alternative. Overall, tailored haemostatic therapies offer a more targeted approach to increase the concentration of coagulation factors in bleeding patients than traditional transfusion protocols.


Introduction
Acquired bleeding disorders are characterised by abnormal haemostasis and represent a major challenge for emergency room physicians. They can develop predominantly as a result of medical conditions, such as liver disease, traumatic injury, surgical procedures, medical interventions, or iatrogenic causes such as anticoagulation medications or massive transfusions [1]. Disrupted balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis leads to coagulopathy and is typically characterised by impaired clot formation leading to spontaneous, prolonged or excessive bleeding, as well as thrombotic tendency [2]. Coagulopathy might occur as a result of dysfunction, reduced levels or absence of coagulation factors, as well as dysfunction or reduced levels of platelets [2]. Deficiencies of coagulation factors may be induced acutely, for instance following the loss of a large amount of blood after major trauma or surgery, which would necessitate fluid replacement therapy and a variety of blood component therapies leading to haemodilution [3]. They may also develop over time, for example due to a vitamin K deficiency or chronic anticoagulation therapy to control hypercoagulability; both can be associated with bleeding in case of overdosing or vascular injury [4].
Early recognition of coagulopathy is crucial for its prompt and successful management and improved clinical outcomes after major blood loss. A variety of haemostatic packages of FFP with RBCs with late or no fibrinogen supplementation did not improve in neither lactate levels, a prognostic marker of tissue hypoperfusion and haemorrhagic shock, nor any ROTEM parameters characterising the clot strength and clotting time (CT) [24]. Overall, more concentrated agents such as cryoprecipitate or CFCs (i.e., FC) appear to be superior to FFP as first-line treatment [22,25]. Poor efficacy of treatment with FFP in comparison with FC was confirmed also by results of a meta-analysis of patient outcomes in massive trauma or surgery [23]. In direct comparison FC was superior to FFP in more than half of the measured outcomes including reducing blood loss, need for allogeneic blood products and length of hospital stay [23]. Moreover, the use of FC intraoperatively was shown to reduce the need for FFP; patients in major vascular surgeries who received FC, compared with those who received FFP, did not require any further supplementation with blood components apart from RBCs [26]. European guidelines now suggest FC as the first-line treatment for major bleeding accompanied by hypofibrinogenaemia [12].

Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants
Patients at elevated risk of arterial or venous thrombosis (e.g., after coronary stenting, primary prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation, secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, etc.) require anticoagulation treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin or with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) [27]. There has been an increasing trend towards anticoagulant therapy in primary prevention with particularly DOAC prescriptions rising rapidly [28,29]. However, in cases of major or life-threatening bleeding, urgent surgery, or sometimes at supratherapeutic levels of anticoagulant without bleeding, urgent reversal of the anticoagulant drug is required.

Treatment of VKA-Associated Bleeding
The treatment of bleeding related to VKA can be achieved by co-administering vitamin K with either FFP or PCC [30]. The treatment goal is to increase the concentration of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors including factors II (FII), VII (FVII), IX (FIX), and X (FX) [30]. Vitamin K induces de novo synthesis of these factors in the liver; therefore, this treatment has a slow onset of action (4-6 h) and may be inadequate for acute haemorrhage treatment [30,31]. Plasma transfusion (FFP or thawed plasma) is commonly used to provide an immediate source of these factors, but to restore haemostatic levels, administration of a large volume is needed, which may lead to fluid overload [32].
PCC represents an alternative source of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors; 3-factor PCC (3F-PCC) contains FII, FIX and FX whilst 4-factor PCC (4F-PCC) contains FII, FVII, FIX and FX, proteins C and S, and heparin [33]. The concentration of clotting factors in PCC is about 25 times higher than that in plasma, therefore, its administration reduces the risk of fluid overload [33]. The superiority of PCCs over plasma to treat VKA-associated bleeding was shown in several studies [34][35][36]. A meta-analysis of 13 studies comparing the use of PCCs and FFP for warfarin reversal showed that PCC was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality [35]. PCC administration in comparison with FFP was also more likely to achieve normalisation of international normalised ratio (INR, odds ratio [OR] 10.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.12-19.07) and the time to correction was shorter (mean difference −6.50 h; 95% CI, −9.75 to −3.24) [35]. Moreover, patients treated with PCC had a lower risk of TACO compared with FFP (OR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13-0.58) and no significant difference in the risk of thromboembolism between patients receiving PCC or FFP was observed (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.44-1.89) [35]. A meta-analysis by Brekelman et al. showed that PCC was more effective than FFP in correcting INR in patients with bleeding complications within 1 h after administration (1.4-1.9 vs. 2.2-12, respectively) [34]. A recent meta-analysis including 17 studies with a total of 2606 participants reported similar findings [36]. Treatment with PCC in comparison with FFP decreased 90-day all-cause mortality, improved INR reversal and had a lower risk of adverse events [36].
One of the side effects of VKA treatment is a high risk of bleeding, particularly of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) [37]. Moreover, patients with VKA-associated ICH (VKA-ICH) are at higher risk of in-hospital haematoma expansion compared with non-VKAtreated patients [38]. A retrospective study comparing mortality in patients with VKA-ICH who received FFP and/or PCC suggested that reversal of VKA-ICH with a combination of FFP and PCC might be associated with the lowest mortality (27.8%), followed by PCC only (37%) and FFP only (45.6%) [39]. A randomised trial in patients with VKA-ICH showed faster INR normalisation with PCC than with FFP, which in turn was associated with smaller haematoma expansion [40]. A meta-analysis by Hill et al. showed that PCC treatment in patients with VKA-ICH resulted in lower mortality and improved INR reversal compared with FFP treatment [36]. Overall, the studies show superiority of PCC over FFP for urgent treatment of VKA-associated bleeding and its use has been now adopted by many guidelines, as summarised in Table 1 [12,14,[41][42][43][44][45].

Treatment of DOAC-Associated Bleeding
DOACs are a newer class of oral anticoagulants that include direct activated FX (FXa) inhibitors (e.g., apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban), and the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran. In comparison with VKAs, DOACs have the advantages of a rapid onset of action, within 2-3 h, and more predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [27,55]. Specific DOAC reversal agents such as andexanet alfa for apixaban and rivaroxaban reversal and idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal are currently available [56]. However, these specific antidotes, particularly andexanet alfa, have limitations including high cost, safety concerns and mechanistic limitations [56], or might not be widely available, which makes managing a life-threatening haemorrhage in a patient receiving FXa inhibitors challenging [55,57]. Furthermore, in emergency situations the administration of specific reversal agents can be delayed if the type and plasma level of DOAC present in a patient's blood needs to be rapidly identified with specific tests [58,59]. Non-specific strategies for the treatment of DOAC-associated bleeding, such as administration of PCC, are now widely recognised and recommended by different organisations for situations when specific agents are not readily available [12,14,41,42,47,48,[50][51][52]54,60]. The guideline recommendations are summarised in Table 1. PCC can effectively restore haemostasis in patients requiring urgent treatment of bleeding related to DOACs as was shown in multiple clinical studies. The UPRATE study investigated the effectiveness of 4F-PCC to treat bleeding associated with FXa inhibitors in two cohorts (Sweden and Canada) and showed comparable haemostatic effectiveness in both groups (69% and 68% of patients, respectively); the authors suggested that 4F-PCC could become an effective and relatively affordable option for management of DOACassociated bleeding [61,62]. Furthermore, a retrospective study of 4F-PCC in patients with major bleeding and a need for treatment of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding reported excellent or good haemostasis in 89% of cases [63]. Of particular interest is a comparison of a subgroup of patients in this trial that met stricter inclusion criteria similar to those used in the specific antidote andexanet alfa (ANNEXA-4) trial [64]. The reported clinical success rate was comparable between these two studies (90% and 82% for 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa, respectively) [63,64]. Another recent observational study showed that a low-dose of 4F-PCC promoted haemostasis in 83.8% of bleeding patients receiving FXa inhibitors [65].
Several retrospective studies compared the haemostatic efficacy of PCC vs. specific reversal agent for the treatment of ICH in patients receiving DOACs. Low-dose 4F-PCC was successfully used to manage DOAC-associated ICH in 94.7% of treated patients [66]. A retrospective analysis of adult patients with FXa inhibitor-related ICH receiving andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC reported no difference in functional outcome or thrombotic events between the two groups [67]. In another retrospective study of FXa-associated ICH, excellent or good haemostatic efficacy was observed in 16/18 (89%) patients treated with andexanet alfa, compared with 6/10 (60%) patients treated with 4F-PCC [68]. However, no statistical comparison of the two study groups was performed due to the small number of patients [68]. Lastly, a retrospective review of patients who received 4F-PCC for the treatment of oral FXa inhibitor-related ICH reported excellent or good haemostatic efficacy in 22/32 (69%) of patients with ICH following treatment with 4F-PCC compared with 135/168 (80%) of patients with ICH in the ANNEXA-4 trial [69].
Overall, there is significant heterogeneity in reporting standards, methodology, and outcomes across these small, retrospective studies; therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution [70]. In a recent meta-analysis of 22 studies of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding treatment, the overall rate of good to excellent haemostatic control with 4F-PCC was 76% [71]. This study also reported a higher rate of thrombotic complications with andexanet alfa in comparison with aPCC/4F-PCC (13% vs. 4%, respectively) [71]. Similarly, another systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the haemostatic effectiveness of andexanet alfa or PCC for acute treatment of FXa inhibitor-associated haemorrhage reported a mean effectiveness for andexanet alfa of 82% at 12 h and 71% at 24 h and for PCC of 88% at 12 h and 76% at 24 h; these differences were not statistically significant [72]. Lastly, meta-analysis by Jaspers et al. also confirmed similar effectiveness of PCC and andexanet alfa in treatment of bleeding patients using FXa inhibitors [73]. However, in both studies the rate of thrombotic events was lower for PCC compared with andexanet alfa [72,73].

Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy
Uncontrolled bleeding is the major cause of preventable death in patients following trauma [74]. At least one in four of all bleeding trauma patients show signs of coagulopathy at hospital admission [75][76][77]. The pathophysiology of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is complex, but the dilution or consumption of clotting factors is the main contributing factor [74]. TIC is associated with an increased rate of massive transfusions and mortality [75,78].
Assessment of coagulopathy and the following bleeding management are often guided by SLTs including prothrombin time (PT), INR, partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and Clauss fibrinogen test. However, the usefulness of SLTs in assessing or managing coagulopathy has been questioned [79]. SLTs provide only limited information (i.e., time of coagulation and platelet count), are time-consuming and tend to be omitted in situations where rapid treatment is needed, such as in severe bleeding [79]. In contrast, POC testing with viscoelastic tests (VET) provides information in real time [80]. VET, e.g., thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thrombelastography (TEG), measure mechanical properties of the clot formation and provide dynamic information on the speed of coagulation initiation, kinetics of clot growth, clot strength, and breakdown of the clot [81]. The advantages and disadvantages of SLTs and VET testing are summarised in Table 2. In emergency situations, haemostatic treatment can be initiated with empirical fixed ratio-based transfusion protocols. However, as the haemostatic state of the patient is unknown, these protocols are in a sense 'blind' transfusions [83]. MTPs vary between hospitals, and the optimal mixture ratio of RBC:FFP:platelet concentrate (PC) is a matter of debate [81]. MTPs are associated with insufficient transfusion of both FFP and platelets, which may aggravate bleeding [83]. Analysis of an in-house transfusion algorithm with a fixed ratio of RBC:FFP:PC of 6:3:1 showed that 82% patients received "insufficient" amounts of FFP and platelets and these amounts were on average 50% lower compared with the calculated amounts [83]. Another study showed that reconstitution of whole blood in a 1:1:1 (RBC:FFP:PC) fixed ratio resulted in significantly lower coagulation factor activity, endogenous thrombin potential and abnormal standard coagulation tests, as well as reduced haematocrit and platelet count [84]. Moreover, fibrinogen concentration was found to be significantly lower in reconstituted blood compared with citrated whole blood [84].
In contrast to MTPs, goal-directed coagulation management (GDCM) algorithms are based on VET results and the treatment is adjusted to the actual needs of the individual patient [80]. Thanks to the short turnaround of VET testing (first results available within 10 min) it is possible to check the effectiveness of the treatment and re-adjust it accordingly at the bedside [6]. GDCM of trauma patients was shown to reduce mortality and to be more efficient than treatment with MTPs [24,[85][86][87]. A retrospective analysis including trauma patients showed that the observed mortality in patients receiving GDCM guided by ROTEM was lower than predicted by the trauma injury severity score [86]. Another study comparing transfusion of FFP and CFCs as the first-line therapy for reversal of TIC was terminated early for futility and safety reasons [25]. FFP showed poor efficacy in limiting blood loss or correcting TIC, and a large proportion of patients required rescue therapy [25].
Since GDCM monitors the patient's haemodynamic state with POC before and during treatment, it reduces the risks of overuse of blood products (especially RBC and FFP) as well as under-transfusion [88]. A comparison between two cohorts of trauma patients treated before and after the implementation of changes in trauma management protocols (i.e., before and after inclusion of GDCM) showed reduced incidence of massive transfusion and a reduction in the transfusion of RBC and FFP in GDCM protocols [88]. Consequently, GDCM with the use of FC instead of FFP reduced not only the use of allogeneic blood products but also the related costs [88]. Implementation of GDCM protocols including POC in two Italian trauma centres led to a reported cost reduction of 23% [89]. Overall, GDCM and use of CFCs (such as FC, PCC, FXIII) may reduce costs associated with transfusion of blood products in patients with acquired bleeding [12].

Goal-Directed Coagulation Management for TIC Patients
An example of ROTEM-guided haemostatic treatment algorithm for TIC is depicted in Figure 1. Individual steps are based on VET results, and the treatment utilises CFCs to restore clot strength, as explained below [6].

Fibrinogen Supplementation
Hypofibrinogenaemia as a result of blood loss, factor consumption, or haemodilution is associated with poor patient outcomes and increased mortality in trauma patients [90]. Fibrinogen concentration on arrival at the hospital may vary depending on individual patient factors; for instance, low fibrinogen levels have been associated with young age, male gender, long time elapsed since injury, low base excess, and high injury severity score [90]. Besides tranexamic acid, FC is the primary pharmacological intervention in TIC [91]. Fibrinogen plasma levels can be indirectly assessed by the FIBTEM test, a type of ROTEM analysis that examines the properties of fibrin-based clot independently by using extrinsic activator (tissue factor) and platelet inhibitor (cytochalasin D) [86]. This test has a high predictive value for massive transfusion in trauma patients comparable with SLTs [92]. FIBTEM amplitude at 10 min following the start of clot formation (FIBTEM A10 ) correlates with fibrinogen concentration [93], and, therefore, allows early identification of fibrinogen deficiency [94]. FIBTEM A10 < 7 mm has been suggested as a trigger for fibrinogen substitution with the aim to raise FIBTEM A10 to at least 10 mm in ongoing bleeding [6].
Fibrinogen supplementation may reduce transfusion requirements with corresponding reductions in morbidity and mortality. Recent studies showed that early FC administration (within one hour of admission) was associated with increased plasma fibrinogen concentration and a favourable survival rate among severe trauma patients [95,96]. The treatment of severe trauma patients with FC as the first-line therapy in bleeding management after hospital admission is unlikely to increase prothrombotic risk [91]. FC supplementation does not lead to higher fibrinogen levels post-trauma (>24 h after treatment) [91]. test, arachidonic acid [ASPI] test, and thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 [TRAP] test) are also performed. † Any major improvement in APTEM parameters compared to corresponding EXTEM parameters may be interpreted as a sign of hyperfibrinolysis. ‡ Only for patients not receiving TXA at an earlier stage of the algorithm. § If decreased ATIII is suspected or known, consider co-administration of ATIII. ¶ Traumatic brain injury: platelet count 80,000-100,000/μl. CA10, clot amplitude at 10 min; BGA, blood gas analysis; BW, body weight; CT, clotting time; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; ISS, injury severity score; MCF, maximum clot firmness; ML, maximum lysis; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; TXA, tranexamic acid. test, arachidonic acid [ASPI] test, and thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 [TRAP] test) are also performed. † Any major improvement in APTEM parameters compared to corresponding EXTEM parameters may be interpreted as a sign of hyperfibrinolysis. ‡ Only for patients not receiving TXA at an earlier stage of the algorithm. § If decreased ATIII is suspected or known, consider co-administration of ATIII. ¶ Traumatic brain injury: platelet count 80,000-100,000/µL. CA 10 , clot amplitude at 10 min; BGA, blood gas analysis; BW, body weight; CT, clotting time; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; ISS, injury severity score; MCF, maximum clot firmness; ML, maximum lysis; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; TXA, tranexamic acid.

Thrombin Generation
In TIC, endogenous thrombin levels remain relatively stable despite dilution [97]. Thrombin generation is higher in trauma patients than in healthy controls as a result of haemostatic dysregulation and systemic changes [98]. During bleeding management, thrombin generation deficit should be considered only after the fibrinogen levels are adjusted [99]. FC supplementation to reach the therapeutic goal of FIBTEM A10 > 10-12 mm also often reduces CT to normal levels [14,99]. A recent in vitro study also showed that the substitution of PCC was not necessary to support clot formation and sufficient thrombin generation in case of sufficient fibrinogen supplementation following dilution [97]. Fibrinogen substitution, however, played a key role in the preservation of haemostatic capacity [97]. However, if EXTEM CT remains > 80 s after FC administration, thrombin generation can be improved by PCC supplementation [6]. There is limited evidence evaluating PCC as first-line therapy in trauma-associated bleeding and further studies are needed to assess its efficacy and safety [100].

Platelet Supplementation
Platelets play a key role in haemostasis and clot formation. Although very few trauma patients have low platelet numbers on admission [101], platelet deficit will very likely develop over time depending on the treatment [14]. Insufficient number of platelets is characterized by EXTEM CA10 < 40 mm (but normal FIBTEM amplitude) and low platelet count (<50,000/µL), which will indicate the need for platelet concentrate administration [6].

Clot Stability and FXIII
FXIII is known to be an essential contributor to clot strength by its ability to crosslink and stabilise fibrin [102]. However, most bleeding management guidelines currently do not include measurement and subsequent supplementation of FXIII [103]. Clot instability due to FXIII deficiency has been identified in some cases by ROTEM [103,104]. In the neurosurgical setting, a postoperative FXIII level < 60% was found to be an independent risk factor for postoperative ICH [105]. In cases of bleeding and low FXIII activity (e.g., <30%), administration of FXIII concentrate (30 IU/kg) is suggested [12].

Goal-Directed Coagulation Management without POC Testing
GDCM algorithms offer a systematic approach to the management of bleeding and guidance in treatment measures [106,107]. Initial steps of most treatment algorithms include SLTs, obtaining patient history (e.g., usage of prescribed oral anticoagulants), and basics of coagulation management, i.e., initial administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in line with current guidelines [14], followed by fibrinogen administration [107]. Fibrinogen administration as well as the following steps are often based on results of VET testing, which is not available in all hospitals, and there is little experience or data on concentratebased management without it [107]. SLTs have a long turn-around time-the standard Clauss fibrinogen test takes on average 40-45 min; therefore, the assessment of plasma fibrinogen levels within the first hour of admission without VET is challenging [108]. However, some parameters allow the estimation of plasma fibrinogen levels based on SLTs and enable rapid FC supplementation even without VET [107]. These can be implemented into alternative coagulation management guidelines (Figure 2) [107].
The Fibrinogen on Admission in Trauma (FibAT) score was developed as a simple clinical tool to predict low fibrinogen concentration in trauma patients on arrival at the hospital [109]. Independent predictive factors for low plasma fibrinogen levels were identified by a multivariate logistic regression model and included factors such as age, heart rate, body temperature, haemoglobin (Hb) concentration on admission, and blood lactate level [109]. A final FibAT score of 5 or above was able to reliably predict trauma patients with fibrinogen levels at 1.5 g/L or below on admission [109]. Another immediate physiological assessment of haemorrhagic shock in trauma patients is provided by basedeficit (BD) measurement that was found to be a better mortality predictor than vital signs [110]. Another study showed that fibrinogen levels show strong correlation with rapidly obtainable routine laboratory parameters, such as base excess (BE) and Hb [108]. These two parameters might provide a sensitive and quick tool to identify major trauma patients that are at risk of reaching critically low fibrinogen. Both parameters are now included in the European Guidelines for bleeding following trauma [14]. Initial Hb is used as indicator for severe bleeding, associated with coagulopathy (Grade 1B) and BD measurements to estimate the extent of bleeding (Grade 1B) [14].

Goal-Directed Coagulation Management without POC Testing
GDCM algorithms offer a systematic approach to the management of bleeding and guidance in treatment measures [106,107]. Initial steps of most treatment algorithms include SLTs, obtaining patient history (e.g., usage of prescribed oral anticoagulants), and basics of coagulation management, i.e., initial administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in line with current guidelines [14], followed by fibrinogen administration [107]. Fibrinogen administration as well as the following steps are often based on results of VET testing, which is not available in all hospitals, and there is little experience or data on concentratebased management without it [107]. SLTs have a long turn-around time-the standard Clauss fibrinogen test takes on average 40-45 min; therefore, the assessment of plasma fibrinogen levels within the first hour of admission without VET is challenging [108]. However, some parameters allow the estimation of plasma fibrinogen levels based on SLTs and enable rapid FC supplementation even without VET [107]. These can be implemented into alternative coagulation management guidelines (Figure 2) [107].

Figure 2.
Simplified treatment algorithm for the initial assessment and management of trauma-induced coagulopathy without VET. Adapted from Casu S, 2021 [107]. Reprinted by permission from BMJ as indicated in the Terms and Conditions of the Creative Commons CC-NY license. BE; base excess; Ca, calcium; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FXIII, factor XIII; Hb, haemoglobin; INR, international normalised ratio; PC, platelet concentrate; pRBC, packed red blood cells; rFVIIa, activated recombinant factor VII; TBI, traumatic brain injury.  [107]. Reprinted by permission from BMJ as indicated in the Terms and Conditions of the Creative Commons CC-NY license. BE; base excess; Ca, calcium; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FXIII, factor XIII; Hb, haemoglobin; INR, international normalised ratio; PC, platelet concentrate; pRBC, packed red blood cells; rFVIIa, activated recombinant factor VII; TBI, traumatic brain injury.
These findings were integrated into a decision tree (Figure 3) to guide fibrinogen dosing based on Hb and BE analysis as these parameters consider the extent of the trauma instead of blindly estimating the required dose [107]. These results are routinely available within minutes as part of blood gas analysis, and can serve as an effective alternative to conventional POC testing [107]. In this way, the published guidelines can be adapted to the local resources and help provide efficient GDCM of trauma-associated bleeding. Limitation of this protocol adaptation is that it is still blind in many aspects, and further studies will be required to validate this method. dosing based on Hb and BE analysis as these parameters consider the extent of the trauma instead of blindly estimating the required dose [107]. These results are routinely available within minutes as part of blood gas analysis, and can serve as an effective alternative to conventional POC testing [107]. In this way, the published guidelines can be adapted to the local resources and help provide efficient GDCM of trauma-associated bleeding. Limitation of this protocol adaptation is that it is still blind in many aspects, and further studies will be required to validate this method.

Conclusions
Despite general improvements in the management of bleeding patients, the treatment protocols vary considerably in different places. This is not only due to local differences in available resources but also a lack of solid evidence supporting one protocol over another. The aim of GDCM is a tailored haemostatic therapy for each patient that would provide the most suitable treatment in the given situation. Algorithms based on VET allow for individualised treatment and reduce the risks of over-or under-transfusion. Moreover, CFCs are an effective and promising alternative to ratio-based transfusion therapies for the correction of different types of coagulopathies and are increasingly incorporated as the first-line treatment option into many guidelines. Finally, initial concentrate-based management is possible also without POC testing; dosage can be also based on parameters from blood gas analysis, offering a vital alternative to ensure patients receive the optimal care.