Tubular Membrane Coupled with Marine Waste-Derived Hybrid Adsorbent for Textile Micropollutant Removal and Photochemical Regeneration
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Material
2.2. Membrane Preparation
2.3. Study Area
2.4. Membrane Characterization
2.5. Filtration Process
2.5.1. Methodology
2.5.2. Experimental Protocol
- Physicochemical analysis of the raw effluent;
- Membrane filtration;
- Physicochemical analysis of the filtrate followed by a comparative study with the real effluent.
2.6. Adsorption Experiments
2.7. Regeneration Experimental Protocol
2.7.1. Operating Mode
2.7.2. Irradiation Device
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characterization of Raw Material
3.1.1. XRD Analysis
3.1.2. XRF Analyses
3.1.3. TGA Analysis
3.1.4. Particle Size Distribution Analyses
3.2. Characterization of Ceramic Membrane
3.3. Characterization of the Adsorbent
3.3.1. Analysis by Infrared Spectrometry
3.3.2. X-Ray Diffraction
3.3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
4. Application
4.1. Filtration and Adsorption Studies
4.2. Surface Charge Characteristics and Adsorption Mechanism
- (i)
- Surface complexation, involving the coordination between surface Ca2+ sites and electron-donating groups of dye molecules or other organic constituents;
- (ii)
- Calcium-mediated interactions and possible co-precipitation, resulting from the partial dissolution of CaCO3 under alkaline conditions;
- (iii)
- Physical adsorption and pore diffusion, facilitated by the biogenic porous structure of the shell material;
- (iv)
- Hydrophobic interactions due to the aromatic structure of indigo molecules.
4.3. Regeneration
Infrared Spectrometry Analysis
4.4. Comparison with Literature
5. Combined Systems Economic Evaluation
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shi, B.; Wang, G.; Feng, C.; Tang, H. Removal of direct dyes by coagulation: The performance of preformed polymeric aluminum species. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarkar, B.; Venkateshwarlu, N.; Rao, R.N.; Bhattacharjee, C.; Kale, V. Potable water production from pesticide contaminated surface water—A membrane based approach. Desalination 2007, 204, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radjenović, J.; Petrocić, M.; Ventura, F.; Barceló, D. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane driking water treatment. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3601–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, A.S.; Wang, L.; Sorg, T.J.; Lytle, D.A. Removing arsenic and co-occurring contaminants from drinking water by full-scale ion exchange and point-of-use/point-of-entry reverse osmosis systems. Water Res. 2020, 172, 115455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, W.L.; Mohammad, A.W.; Hilal, N.; Leo, C.P. A review on the applicability of integrated/hybrid membrane processes in water treatment and desalination plants. Desalination 2015, 363, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Q.; Lim, Y.J.; Wang, R. Chemically robust hollow fiber thin-film composite membranes based on polyurea selective layers for nanofiltration under extreme pH conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2026, 738, 124818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozia, S. Photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) in water and wastewater treatment. A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Dong, B.Z.; Gao, N.Y.; Fan, J.C. Effect of coagulation pretreatment on fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane. Desalination 2007, 204, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeili, A.; Saremnia, B. Comparison study of adsorption and nanofiltration methods for removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from oil-field wastewater. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2018, 171, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: http://www.citet.nat.tn/Portail/doc/SYRACUSE/40964/norme-tunisienne-nt-106-002-norme-tunisienne-nt-106-002-1989-relative-aux-rejets-d-eents-dans-le?lg=fr-FR (accessed on 26 January 2026).
- Schwertmann, U.; Cornell, R.M. Iron Oxides in the Laboratory, Preparation and Characterization; Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Chihi, R.; Blidi, I.; Trabelsi-Ayadi, M.; Ayari, F. Elaboration and characterization of a low-cost porous ceramic support from natural Tunisian bentonite clay. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2019, 22, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beniash, E.; Aizenberg, J.; Addadi, L.; Weiner, S. Amorphous calcium carbonate transforms into calcite during sea urchin larval spicule growth. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 1997, 264, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addadi, L.; Raz, S.; Weiner, S. Taking advantage of disorder: Amorphous calcium carbonate and its roles in biomineralization. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 959e970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickson, J.A.D. Morphological analysis of archetypal calcite cement. J. Sediment. Res. 2019, 89, 66–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skanji, T.; Dutruch, L.; Grenier-Loustalot, M.F. Caractérization des composés organiques volatils et des résidus de degradation thermique d’un tensioactif anionique organophosphoré. J. Société Chim. Tunis. 2008, 10, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
- Sanders, J.P.; Gallagher, P.K. Kinetic analyses using simultaneous TG/DSC measurements: Part I: Decomposition of calcium carbonate in argon. Thermochim. Acta 2002, 388, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, S.; Kamruddin, M.; Ajikumar, P.K.; Tyagi, A.K.; Raj, B. Nanocrystalline and metastable phase formation in vacuum thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate. Thermochim. Acta 2000, 363, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ejraei, A.; Aroon, M.A.; Saravani, A.Z. Wastewater treatment using a hybrid system combining adsorption, photocatalytic degradation and membrane filtration processes. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 28, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, C.S.D.; Madeira, L.M.; Boaventura, R.A.R. Synthetic textile dyeing wastewater treatment by integration of advanced oxidation and biological processes—Performance analysis with costs reduction. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badaoui, A.K.; Zaher, K. Hybrid treatment system for real textile wastewater remediation based on coagulation/flocculation, adsorption and filtration processes: Performance and economic evaluation. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozia, S.; Tomaszewska, M. Treatment of surface water using hybrid processes—adsorption on PAC and ultrafiltration. Desalination 2004, 162, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naje, A.S.; Chelliapan, S.; Zakaria, Z.; Abbas, S.A. Enhancement of an electrocoagulation process for the treatment of textile wastewater under combined electrical connections using titanium plates. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 4495–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naje, A.S.; Abbas, S.A. Combination of electrocoagulation and electro-oxidation processes of textile waste waters treatment. Civil Environ. Res. 2013, 3, 61–73. [Google Scholar]



















| wt, % | Raw Material | Methocel | Amigel | Starch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | |||||
| Clayey membrane | 84 | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Parameters | pH | Conductivity | COD | BOD5 | TSS | Color | λmax | Chloride |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Units | _ | µScm−1 | mgL−1 | mgL−1 | mgL−1 | pt-co | nm | mgL−1 |
| Effluent | 12.4 | 12,372 | 1400 | 400 | 141 | 1580 | 594 | 2000 |
| Tunisian Standards (Public Hydraulic Domain) | 6.5–8.5 | 1000 | 90 | 30 | 30 | 70 | _ | 600 |
| Weight wt% | Fe(T) | SiO2 | CaO | Al2O3 | Na2O | MnO | MgO | TiO2 | P2O5 | SO3 | K2O | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clay | 5.15 | 70.5 | 2.4 | 14.31 | - | - | 2.89 | 0.2 | - | 0.21 | 0.52 | 9.01 |
| COD (mg/L) | BOD5 (mg/L) | TSS (mg/L) | pH | Color (Pt-Co) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Effluent | 1400 | 400 | 141 | 11.5 | 1580 |
| After Filtration Process | 766 | 218 | 77.14 | 9 | 420 |
| After Adsorption Process | 201 | 54 | 19 | 7.3 | 55 |
| Tunisian standard for disposal of industrial wastewater into river (Tunisian standard NT 106.002, 1989 [17]) | 90 | 30 | 30 | 6.5–8.5 | 100 |
| Process Used | Remarks | Wastewater/Dye | Color % | COD% | BOD5% | TSS% | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photocatalytic degradation process | TiO2 nanoparticles Sol–gel method | Real effluent | - | 79 | 80 | 11 | [19] |
| Adsorption process | Clam shell as adsorbent | Real textile | 86.9 | 73.75 | 75.2 | 75.3 | This Work |
| Adsorption process | Activated carbon as adsorbent | Real effluent | - | 65 | 58 | 10 | [19] |
| Filtration process | Clayey tubular membrane Extrusion | Real textile | 73.41 | 45.28 | 45.2 | 45.2 | This Work |
| Filtration process | PAN/PVP membrane PAN flat sheet nanofiltration Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as additive Dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent Phase inversion method | Real effluent | - | 86 | 83 | 92 | [19] |
| Fenton reaction | Used in a sequential bath reactor | Synthetic cotton textile wastewater | 99 | 88 | 83 | - | [20] |
| Synthetic polyester textile wastewater | 99 | 91 | 91 | - | [20] | ||
| 1. Coagulation/flocculation 2. Adsorption 3. Filtration | 1. Using FeCl3 2. Using nZVI 3. Using micro zeolite | 98.4 | 97.5 | _ | 98 | [21] | |
| 1. Filtration 2. Adsorption 3. Photo-Fenton | 1. Using clayey membrane 2. Clam shell 3. Fe2SO4 | Real textile | 99 | 86.53 | 94.5 | 92.19 | This work |
| 1. Membrane filtration 2. Adsorption 3. Photocatalyst | 1. Using PAN/PVP membrane 2. Using activated carbon as adsorbent 3. Using TiO2 nanoparticles | Real effluent | - | 88 | 86 | 98 | [19] |
| 1. Adsorption 2. Membrane filtration 3. Photocatalyst | 1. Using activated carbon as adsorbent 2. Using PAN/PVP membrane 3. Using TiO2 nanoparticles | Real effluent | - | 89 | 87 | 96 | [19] |
| 1. Adsorption 2. Membrane filtration | 1. Powdered activated carbon (commercial CWZ30) as adsorbent 2. Polyacrylonitrile as UF membrane | organic carbon | 92% | 65% | - | - | [22] |
| EC: Electrocoagulation EO: Electrooxidation | EC + EO | Textile wastewater | 97.5% | 93.5% | 97% | [23] | |
| Photo-Fenton process | Using Fe2SO4 | Real textile | 99 | 86.53 | 59.25 | 42.10 | This Work |
| EC: Electrocoagulation EO: Electrooxidation | EC + EO | Textile wastewater | - | 90 | 87.0 | - | [24] |
| Quantity estimated | 200 m3/day |
| Number of working hours per day | 8 h/day |
| Number of working day per year | 302 day/year |
| direct cost | |
| Raw material consumption | 9.32 $/m3 |
| Reagents | 3.57 $/m3 |
| Labors charge | 37.5 $/m3 |
| Energy consumption cost | 0.008 $/m3 |
| Mechanical instruments | 15 $/m3 |
| Electrical instruments | 9 $/m3 |
| indirect cost | |
| Maintenance cost | 12 $/m3 |
| Others cost | 7 $/m3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chihi, R.; Mahresi, M.I.; Ayari, F.; Mansour, L.; Othman, A.B. Tubular Membrane Coupled with Marine Waste-Derived Hybrid Adsorbent for Textile Micropollutant Removal and Photochemical Regeneration. Membranes 2026, 16, 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16030110
Chihi R, Mahresi MI, Ayari F, Mansour L, Othman AB. Tubular Membrane Coupled with Marine Waste-Derived Hybrid Adsorbent for Textile Micropollutant Removal and Photochemical Regeneration. Membranes. 2026; 16(3):110. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16030110
Chicago/Turabian StyleChihi, Rania, Mouna Ibn Mahresi, Fadhila Ayari, Lamjed Mansour, and Amel Ben Othman. 2026. "Tubular Membrane Coupled with Marine Waste-Derived Hybrid Adsorbent for Textile Micropollutant Removal and Photochemical Regeneration" Membranes 16, no. 3: 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16030110
APA StyleChihi, R., Mahresi, M. I., Ayari, F., Mansour, L., & Othman, A. B. (2026). Tubular Membrane Coupled with Marine Waste-Derived Hybrid Adsorbent for Textile Micropollutant Removal and Photochemical Regeneration. Membranes, 16(3), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16030110

