Hydrogen Flux Inhibition of Pd-Ru Membranes under Exposure to NH3

The hydrogen flux inhibition of Pd-Ru membranes under exposure to 1–10% NH3 at 673–773 K was investigated. The Pd-Ru membranes were characterized by XRD, SEM, XPS, and hydrogen permeation tests. The results show that when exposed to 1–10% NH3 at 723 K for 6 h, the hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes sharply decreases by 15–33%, and the decline in hydrogen flux becomes more significant with increasing temperatures. After the removal of 1–10% NH3, 100% recovery of hydrogen flux is observed. XPS results show that nitrogenous species appear on the membrane surface after NH3 exposure, and the hydrogen flux inhibition may be related to the competitive adsorption of nitrogenous species. By comparing the hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH3 with 10% N2, it is indicated that the rapid decrease in hydrogen flux is due to the concentration polarization and competitive adsorption of nitrogenous species. The competitive adsorption effect is attenuated, while the concentration polarization effect becomes more pronounced with increasing temperature.


Introduction
In recent decades, hydrogen as an ideal energy carrier has received wide attention due to its CO X -free nature, environmental friendliness, and high energy density [1].However, the difficulty in hydrogen storage and transportation and the poor safety hinder the further application of hydrogen.At present, large-scale storage and transportation of hydrogen are mainly achieved with compressed hydrogen [2] and liquid hydrogen [3], but both methods have the limitations of large energy consumption.Alternatively, hydrogen can be stored by chemical storage using hydrogen carriers such as methanol, formic acid, NH 3 , etc. NH 3 is liquid at room temperature and medium pressure (<1 MPa) [4], and it is relatively easy to transport and store.The hydrogen storage density of NH 3 (17.8wt.% [5]) surpasses that of methanol (12.6 wt.% [6]) and formic acid (4.34 wt.% [7]), making it a promising liquid hydrogen carrier.Hydrogen can be produced by the decomposition of NH 3 , followed by hydrogen separation and purification to meet the requirements of downstream applications.This offers a practical solution for the efficient and secure storage, delivery, and versatile usage of hydrogen.
The gases produced by thermal decomposition of NH 3 are hydrogen, nitrogen, and trace ammonia.Hydrogen needs to be further separated and purified from these decomposition gases for downstream applications.Traditional hydrogen purification methods like pressure swing adsorption (PSA) have drawbacks such as high energy consumption, low hydrogen purity, and large foot-print area [8].Hydrogen purification using Pd membranes shows great potential in small-to medium-scale hydrogen production [9,10].By integrating the NH 3 decomposition process with membrane purification in a single chamber [11,12], the separation and purification of hydrogen are realized while the decomposing reaction is conducted.This facilitates the transition of NH 3 decomposition reaction towards the product side, overcoming the thermodynamic constraints of the NH 3 decomposition reaction [13], significantly reducing its operating temperature (<773 K) and improving the NH 3 conversion efficiency.Cechetto et al. [14] found that the NH 3 decomposition membrane reactor achieved 15% higher NH 3 conversion than conventional reactors.The hydrogen yield exceeded 86%, and the purity of hydrogen reached 99.998%.This demonstrates the potential of membrane reactors in NH 3 decomposition for hydrogen production.
In NH 3 decomposition membrane reactors, Pd-based membranes, such as pure Pd [15,16], Pd-Ag [13,17], Pd-Au [18], etc., exhibit outstanding performance in terms of hydrogen separation.However, pure Pd membranes have limitations in terms of working temperature.The pure Pd membranes may cause hydrogen embrittlement at low temperatures (<573 K).Although the above-mentioned Pd-Ag and Pd-Au alloy membranes show property improvements in the aspects of hydrogen embrittlement and hydrogen permeation, defects or pinholes develop with time at high temperatures, and they have poor resistance to impurity poisoning.Pd-Ru membranes were widely used in membrane reactions for their high hydrogen permeability, resistance against impurity, and high thermal stability [19][20][21].
In the process of NH 3 decomposition, the presence of N 2 and residual NH 3 may adversely affect the hydrogen permeation performance of Pd membranes.Sakamoto et al. [22] investigated the effects of N 2 and NH 3 on the hydrogen permeation performance of Pd membranes.The hydrogen flux of pure Pd membranes was reduced by 13% under exposure to 10% NH 3 at 523 K, while it was only reduced by 9% after exposure to 10% N 2 .They observed the N 1s spectra by XPS on the membrane after NH 3 exposure, and the decrease in hydrogen flux was mainly due to the competitive adsorption on the membrane surface occupying the hydrogen dissociation adsorption site.However, the XPS analysis showed that chemical species, such as NH 2 , NH 3 , -NO, NO 2 , etc., could not be identified.Zhang et al. [23] showed a slight decrease (6.3%) in the hydrogen flux of pure Pd membranes with increasing NH 3 content in the feed gas from 920 ppm to 63,000 ppm, and no significant hydrogen permeability change was observed over several days.However, owing to the change in hydrogen content at different temperatures, it remains uncertain whether hydrogen partial pressure or NH 3 contributes to the decreased hydrogen flux.Similarly, Lundin et al. [24] did not observe any inhibition of hydrogen fluxes by N 2 or NH 3 at 673 K and 1 MPa.To evaluate the effect of trace NH 3 , Peters et al. [25] investigated the flux inhibition of Pd 77 Ag 23 membranes exposed to 10-500 ppm NH 3 .They found no inhibition effect on the hydrogen flux of Pd 77 Ag 23 membranes when exposed to 200 ppm NH 3 at 723 K.However, the hydrogen flux of Pd 77 Ag 23 membranes was reduced by 26% in the presence of 200 ppm NH 3 at 573 K.They concluded that the inhibition of hydrogen flux might be related to the incorporation of changes in the Pd alloy membranes due to surface segregation.
It is clear that the reported effects of NH 3 on the hydrogen flux of Pd-based membranes are contradictory, and the poisoning mechanism of NH 3 remains unclear.The role of NH 3 seems more complex, and specific studies on individual factors are needed to further elucidate their poisoning mechanisms.In particular, a few issues about the poisoning of NH 3 on Pd-Ru membranes are discussed.To further improve the overall performance of Pd-Ru membranes and better optimize the operating conditions in membrane reactors, it is essential to clarify the inhibition effect of NH 3 on the hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes under the conditions of NH 3 decomposition.
In this paper, we investigate the hydrogen permeation performance of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 1-10% NH 3 at 673-773 K and different pressures.We present the effects of NH 3 concentration and exposure temperatures on the hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes, and the NH 3 poisoning mechanism on the Pd-Ru membranes is analyzed.

Membrane Preparation
Porous alumina ceramic tubes with a diameter of 12 mm and an average pore size of 0.05 µm were used as the supports of the Pd-Ru membrane.The Pd-Ru membrane was deposited by a sequential electroless plating technique [26].The surface of the porous alumina ceramic tubes was uniformly sprayed with palladium acetate dissolved in chloroform.Subsequently, the tubes were heat-treated for 3 h at 523 K in an air atmosphere to convert the palladium acetate into palladium oxide.These heat-treated substrate tubes were then reduced in hydrazine baths for 1 h to form palladium nano-particles.The Pd layer was deposited on the activated surface by electroless plating at 308 K, followed by the deposition of the Ru layer on top of the Pd layer at 333 K.The bath compositions of the electroless plating are presented in Table 1.The as-deposited Pd-Ru membranes were heat-treated by a hydrogen permeation process at 723 K for 24 h.

NH 3 Poisoning Tests and Characterization
Graphite seals were used to seal the Pd-Ru membrane tubes into tubular stainless steel cavities.The feed gases entered through the shell side and the hydrogen permeated through the membrane to the tube side.The feed pressure was controlled with a pressure regulator installed on the retentate side.
Prior to NH 3 exposure, pure hydrogen permeation tests were performed on the Pd-Ru membranes in the range of 623-773 K and 0.1-0.4MPa.NH 3 poisoning tests were performed by passing a 1-10% NH 3 /H 2 mixture through these membranes for 6 h at 723 K.After NH 3 exposure, pure hydrogen was introduced to evaluate the recovery performance of hydrogen flux.Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH 3 were further examined for changes in hydrogen flux under different temperatures and pressures.For comparative analysis, the NH 3 poisoning tests were all performed on the same membrane.And different membrane samples prepared with the same preparation process were used in the postprocess characterization.
The surface microstructural characterization of the membranes was performed by using a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan).The phase and composition of the membranes before and after NH 3 exposure were determined using a Rigaku D/max 2500 X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and ESCA-LAB Xi+ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).For the XPS analysis, the C 1s reference signal was used as a calibrated reference.

Hydrogen Permeation Experiments
SEM micrographs of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane are shown in Figure 1.The membrane is compact without pinholes or cracks, which confirms that the electroless plating conditions used in this study are suitable for preparing a uniform membrane surface.As shown in Figure 1b, the Pd-Ru membrane has two distinct layers, Pd and Ru layers.The thickness of the Pd layer is about 5 µm, and the thickness of the Ru layer is about 0.25 µm.EDS mappings of the Pd-Ru membrane are shown in Figure 2, and it is clear that the Ru layer is above the Pd layer.According to the thickness of the Pd-Ru membrane and the metal density, the Ru content is calculated as about 5 wt.%.
membrane is compact without pinholes or cracks, which confirms that the electroless p ing conditions used in this study are suitable for preparing a uniform membrane surf As shown in Figure 1b, the Pd-Ru membrane has two distinct layers, Pd and Ru lay The thickness of the Pd layer is about 5 µm, and the thickness of the Ru layer is about 0 µm.EDS mappings of the Pd-Ru membrane are shown in Figure 2, and it is clear that Ru layer is above the Pd layer.According to the thickness of the Pd-Ru membrane and metal density, the Ru content is calculated as about 5 wt.%.The XRD pattern of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane is shown in Figure 3.The fractogram exhibits peaks of the Pd phase and Ru phase, indicating that the Pd-Ru me brane has been successfully prepared.SEM micrographs of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane are shown in Figur membrane is compact without pinholes or cracks, which confirms that the electrol ing conditions used in this study are suitable for preparing a uniform membrane As shown in Figure 1b, the Pd-Ru membrane has two distinct layers, Pd and R The thickness of the Pd layer is about 5 µm, and the thickness of the Ru layer is ab µm.EDS mappings of the Pd-Ru membrane are shown in Figure 2, and it is clear Ru layer is above the Pd layer.According to the thickness of the Pd-Ru membrane metal density, the Ru content is calculated as about 5 wt.%.The XRD pattern of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane is shown in Figure 3. fractogram exhibits peaks of the Pd phase and Ru phase, indicating that the Pd-R brane has been successfully prepared.Hydrogen permeation through Pd membranes follows the solutionanism [27].Driven by the partial pressure difference between the two si brane, hydrogen diffuses from the high-pressure region to the low-press drogen molecules adsorbed on the surface of the Pd membrane undergo hydrogen atoms, which then dissolve in the Pd lattice.When diffused to surface of the low-pressure side, hydrogen molecules are reconnected and the Pd surface.The hydrogen permeation flux is obtained by combining F law: gen permeability of the membrane, mol•m −1 •s −1 •Pa −n ; d is the total thickn brane, m; P1 is the partial pressure of hydrogen on the feed side, Pa; P2 is sure of hydrogen on the permeated side, Pa; and n is the pressure expone Figure 4 shows the variation in hydrogen flux through Pd-Ru membr temperatures and pressures.The hydrogen flux gradually increases with perature and pressure difference.At temperatures of 623 K, 673 K, 723 K hydrogen permeability values for the Pd-Ru membrane are measured as f mol , respectively.The determined value agreed quite well ported in the literature [28].The pressure exponent n values are measured 0.69, 0.66, and 0.77.The values of the pressure exponent n are all in the indicating that both the surface reaction and the bulk diffusion of the h control the hydrogen permeation through the Pd-Ru membranes.At a tem K, the H2/N2 selectivity value for the Pd-Ru membrane at 0.1 MPa is 1960 Hydrogen permeation through Pd membranes follows the solution-diffusion mechanism [27].Driven by the partial pressure difference between the two sides of the membrane, hydrogen diffuses from the high-pressure region to the low-pressure region.Hydrogen molecules adsorbed on the surface of the Pd membrane undergo dissociation into hydrogen atoms, which then dissolve in the Pd lattice.When diffused to the membrane surface of the low-pressure side, hydrogen molecules are reconnected and desorbed from the Pd surface.The hydrogen permeation flux is obtained by combining Fick and Sieverts' law: where J H 2 is the hydrogen permeate flux of the membrane, mol•m −2 •s −1 ; P e is the hydrogen permeability of the membrane, mol•m −1 •s −1 •Pa −n ; d is the total thickness of the membrane, m; P 1 is the partial pressure of hydrogen on the feed side, Pa; P 2 is the partial pressure of hydrogen on the permeated side, Pa; and n is the pressure exponent.Figure 4 shows the variation in hydrogen flux through Pd-Ru membranes at different temperatures and pressures.The hydrogen flux gradually increases with the rising temperature and pressure difference.At temperatures of 623 K, 673 K, 723 K, and 773 K, the hydrogen permeability values for the Pd-Ru membrane are measured as follows: 4 5 , respectively.The determined value agreed quite well with values reported in the literature [28].The pressure exponent n values are measured as follows: 0.65, 0.69, 0.66, and 0.77.The values of the pressure exponent n are all in the range of 0.5-1, indicating that both the surface reaction and the bulk diffusion of the hydrogen atoms control the hydrogen permeation through the Pd-Ru membranes.At a temperature of 723 K, the H 2 /N 2 selectivity value for the Pd-Ru membrane at 0.1 MPa is 1960.When exposed to 1-10% NH3, the relative hydrogen fluxes through branes decreased sharply by 15-33% before rapidly stabilizing at new stead The inhibition effect of NH3 became more pronounced with the increase in tration.After NH3 removal, the hydrogen fluxes all recovered to 100%, indi inhibition caused by NH3 on the hydrogen fluxes is completely reversible adsorption of NH3 on the surface of Pd-Ru membranes may be a reason fo in hydrogen fluxes.This is mainly due to the fact that among the availab sites, the top side of the horizontal orientation for hydrogen molecules exh energetically favorable condition (−0.343 eV), while the adsorption energy cules is greater than −0.84 eV, slightly stronger than that of hydrogen [29,30] time of hydrogen flux after pure hydrogen treatment increases with increa centration.These occupied active sites are gradually released over time f hydrogen treatment, resulting in the recovery of hydrogen flux.Thus, it c that the decrease in hydrogen flux may be related to the physical adsorpt the surface of the Pd-Ru membrane.) before NH 3 exposure.When exposed to 1-10% NH 3 , the relative hydrogen fluxes through Pd-Ru membranes decreased sharply by 15-33% before rapidly stabilizing at new steady-state values.The inhibition effect of NH 3 became more pronounced with the increase in NH 3 concentration.After NH 3 removal, the hydrogen fluxes all recovered to 100%, indicating that the inhibition caused by NH 3 on the hydrogen fluxes is completely reversible.The physical adsorption of NH 3 on the surface of Pd-Ru membranes may be a reason for the decrease in hydrogen fluxes.This is mainly due to the fact that among the available adsorption sites, the top side of the horizontal orientation for hydrogen molecules exhibits the most energetically favorable condition (−0.343 eV), while the adsorption energy of NH 3 molecules is greater than −0.84 eV, slightly stronger than that of hydrogen [29,30].The recovery time of hydrogen flux after pure hydrogen treatment increases with increasing NH 3 concentration.These occupied active sites are gradually released over time following pure hydrogen treatment, resulting in the recovery of hydrogen flux.Thus, it can be inferred that the decrease in hydrogen flux may be related to the physical adsorption of NH 3 on the surface of the Pd-Ru membrane.

Effect of NH3 on Hydrogen Permeation through Pd-Ru Membrane
Membranes 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW

Effect of NH3 Exposure Temperature
As mentioned above, the inhibition effect of 10% NH3 on the hydrogen flu Pd-Ru membrane is more significant.Therefore, 10% NH3 was chosen to investi effect of NH3 at different exposure temperatures.Figure 6 shows the relative hy flux of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH3 at various temperatures at 0.1 M the subsequent recovery using pure hydrogen.The hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru mem rapidly decreased 27-50% after exposure to 10% NH3 at 673-773 K, and the in extent of NH3 increased with increasing temperature.All hydrogen fluxes recov 100% upon introducing pure hydrogen.In addition to competitive adsorption effects, the concentration polarization by the accumulation of non-permeable gases on upstream surfaces also blocks the ation of hydrogen.For the NH3/H2 mixtures, both physical adsorption and conce polarization effects may occur.N2 is usually regarded as an inert gas, and hydro inhibition is observed after the introduction of N2.This is typically attributed to centration polarization rather than competing adsorption [24].To comprehend th

Effect of NH 3 Exposure Temperature
As mentioned above, the inhibition effect of 10% NH 3 on the hydrogen flux of the Pd-Ru membrane is more significant.Therefore, 10% NH 3 was chosen to investigate the effect of NH 3 at different exposure temperatures.Figure 6 shows the relative hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH 3 at various temperatures at 0.1 MPa and the subsequent recovery using pure hydrogen.The hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes rapidly decreased by 27-50% after exposure to 10% NH 3 at 673-773 K, and the inhibition extent of NH 3 increased with increasing temperature.All hydrogen fluxes recovered to 100% upon introducing pure hydrogen.

Effect of NH3 Exposure Temperature
As mentioned above, the inhibition effect of 10% NH3 on the hydrogen flu Pd-Ru membrane is more significant.Therefore, 10% NH3 was chosen to investi effect of NH3 at different exposure temperatures.Figure 6 shows the relative hy flux of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH3 at various temperatures at 0.1 M the subsequent recovery using pure hydrogen.The hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru mem rapidly decreased by 27-50% after exposure to 10% NH3 at 673-773 K, and the in extent of NH3 increased with increasing temperature.All hydrogen fluxes recov 100% upon introducing pure hydrogen.In addition to competitive adsorption effects, the concentration polarization by the accumulation of non-permeable gases on upstream surfaces also blocks the ation of hydrogen.For the NH3/H2 mixtures, both physical adsorption and conce polarization effects may occur.N2 is usually regarded as an inert gas, and hydro inhibition is observed after the introduction of N2.This is typically attributed to centration polarization rather than competing adsorption [24].To comprehend th of concentration polarization and competitive adsorption of NH3, the variation in drogen flux through Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH3 and 10% N2 at differ peratures was investigated.In addition to competitive adsorption effects, the concentration polarization caused by the accumulation of non-permeable gases on upstream surfaces also blocks the permeation of hydrogen.For the NH 3 /H 2 mixtures, both physical adsorption and concentration polarization effects may occur.N 2 is usually regarded as an inert gas, and hydrogen flux inhibition is observed after the introduction of N 2 .This is typically attributed to the concentration polarization rather than competing adsorption [24].To comprehend the effects of concentration polarization and competitive adsorption of NH 3 , the variation in the hydrogen flux through Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 at different temperatures was investigated.
Figure 7 shows the temperature dependence of relative hydrogen flux for the Pd-Ru membrane when exposed to 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 at 673-773 K.The difference in relative hydrogen flux (( ) represents the competitive adsorption effect of NH 3 .The permeation of H 2 /N 2 can be used to study concentration polarization.The decrease in hydrogen flux increases with rising temperature when exposed to 10% N 2 , which proves a gradual increase in concentration polarization effect.There are two main effects of the temperature on concentration polarization [31].On the one hand, higher temperature enhances the diffusion coefficient and improves the mass transfer behavior, thereby weakening the concentration polarization effect.On the other hand, with higher temperatures, the hydrogen flux through the membrane is enhanced and the concentration polarization effect becomes more severe.As shown in Figure 6, with increasing temperature from 673 to 773 K, the difference in the relative hydrogen flux between Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 decreased from 13.3% to 5.9%, indicating a gradual reduction in the competitive adsorption effect.The results suggest that both concentration polarization and competitive adsorption of NH 3 occur simultaneously when the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to NH 3 .Competitive adsorption has a bigger effect at lower temperatures, whereas concentrated polarization becomes more prominent at higher temperatures.The combined effect of these two effects ultimately leads to an increase in the inhibition effect of NH 3 with rising temperature, as shown in Figure 5.
Membranes 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW hydrogen flux ( ) represents the competitive adsorption e NH3.The permeation of H2/N2 can be used to study concentration polarization.crease in hydrogen flux increases with rising temperature when exposed to 10% N proves a gradual increase in concentration polarization effect.There are two mai of the temperature on concentration polarization [31].On the one hand, higher te ture enhances the diffusion coefficient and improves the mass transfer behavior, weakening the concentration polarization effect.On the other hand, with higher atures, the hydrogen flux through the membrane is enhanced and the concentra larization effect becomes more severe.As shown in Figure 6, with increasing temp from 673 to 773 K, the difference in the relative hydrogen flux between Pd-Ru mem exposed to 10% NH3 and 10% N2 decreased from 13.3% to 5.9%, indicating a gra duction in the competitive adsorption effect.The results suggest that both conce polarization and competitive adsorption of NH3 occur simultaneously when th membrane is exposed to NH3.Competitive adsorption has a bigger effect at low peratures, whereas concentrated polarization becomes more prominent at higher atures.The combined effect of these two effects ultimately leads to an increase in hibition effect of NH3 with rising temperature, as shown in Figure 5. Figure 8 shows the variation in hydrogen flux with pressure when the Pd-R brane is exposed to 10% NH3 and 10% N2 at 723 K. Compared with N2, the inhib hydrogen flux is more pronounced for the same NH3 concentration, further indicat the poisoning effect of NH3 on Pd-Ru membranes is influenced by other factors in a to the concentration polarization effect.With the same N2 concentration, there is increase in hydrogen flux inhibition with increasing pressure due to an elevation sure leading to a higher hydrogen composition gradient and a lower diffusion coe As a result, the effect of concentration polarization increases with rising pressure trast, there are no significant changes in the hydrogen flux under NH3 exposure a ent pressures, indicating that pressure plays a minor role in the NH3 poisoning fo membranes.Figure 8 shows the variation in hydrogen flux with pressure when the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 at 723 K. Compared with N 2 , the inhibition of hydrogen flux is more pronounced for the same NH 3 concentration, further indicating that the poisoning effect of NH 3 on Pd-Ru membranes is influenced by other factors in addition to the concentration polarization effect.With the same N 2 concentration, there is a slight increase in hydrogen flux inhibition with increasing pressure due to an elevation in pressure leading to a higher hydrogen composition gradient and a lower diffusion coefficient.As a result, the effect of concentration polarization increases with rising pressure.In contrast, there are no significant changes in the hydrogen flux under NH 3 exposure at different pressures, indicating that pressure plays a minor role in the NH 3 poisoning for Pd-Ru membranes.

Post-Process Characterization
Figure 9 shows the SEM images of Pd-Ru membranes after exposure to 10% 6 h at various temperatures.A surface smoothening and grain size growth are o after exposure to 10% NH3.No cracks or pinholes are observed on the Pd-Ru mem The N2 flux of the Pd-Ru membrane before and after NH3 exposure did not sh significant changes and the Pd-Ru membranes remained dense and defect-free, in that NH3 exposure has no significant effect on the surface morphology of the Pd-R branes.Figure 10 shows the grazing incidence XRD patterns obtained from the Pd-R brane after exposure to 10% NH3 at 723 K for 6 h.After the NH3 exposure, the significant change in the phase of the Pd-Ru membrane, which is consistent with t membrane.

Post-Process Characterization
Figure 9 shows the SEM images of Pd-Ru membranes after exposure to 10% NH 3 for 6 h at various temperatures.A surface smoothening and grain size growth are observed after exposure to 10% NH 3 .No cracks or pinholes are observed on the Pd-Ru membranes.The N 2 flux of the Pd-Ru membrane before and after NH 3 exposure did not show any significant changes and the Pd-Ru membranes remained dense and defect-free, indicating that NH 3 exposure has no significant effect on the surface morphology of the Pd-Ru membranes.

Post-Process Characterization
Figure 9 shows the SEM images of Pd-Ru membranes after exposure to 10% 6 h at various temperatures.A surface smoothening and grain size growth are o after exposure to 10% NH3.No cracks or pinholes are observed on the Pd-Ru mem The N2 flux of the Pd-Ru membrane before and after NH3 exposure did not sh significant changes and the Pd-Ru membranes remained dense and defect-free, in that NH3 exposure has no significant effect on the surface morphology of the Pd-R branes.Figure 10 shows the grazing incidence XRD patterns obtained from the Pd-R brane after exposure to 10% NH3 at 723 K for 6 h.After the NH3 exposure, the significant change in the phase of the Pd-Ru membrane, which is consistent with t membrane.Figure 10 shows the grazing incidence XRD patterns obtained from the Pd-Ru membrane after exposure to 10% NH 3 at 723 K for 6 h.After the NH 3 exposure, there is no significant change in the phase of the Pd-Ru membrane, which is consistent with the fresh membrane.Figure 11 shows the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Pd 3d, Ru 3p, and N 1s for the Pd-Ru membranes before and after exposure to 10% NH3 at 723 K for 6 h.A elements, i.e., Pd, Ru, and N, are detected on the surface of the membrane.There tributions from high valence states of Pd n+ and Ru n+ [32].Figure 11c shows that a fr Ru membrane surface results in a dominant N 1s peak centered at an energy level eV corresponding to NH3, which may be introduced by the process of electroless When the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to 10% NH3 at 723 K, the N 1s spectrum i broad and exhibits at least three distinct peaks.It can be seen that the fitted N 1s sp reveals a main peak at around 399.8 eV, corresponding to NH3, and the peak at 3 is assigned to NHX (x = 1, 2) [33].The N 1s spectrum at 402 eV could not be ide During NH3 exposure, NH3 molecules and other nitrogenous species are adsorbe surface of the Pd-Ru membrane, covering the hydrogen adsorption sites and thus ing hydrogen permeation through the Pd-Ru membrane.Figure 11 shows the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Pd 3d, Ru 3p, and N 1s signals for the Pd-Ru membranes before and after exposure to 10% NH 3 at 723 K for 6 h.All three elements, i.e., Pd, Ru, and N, are detected on the surface of the membrane.There are contributions from high valence states of Pd n+ and Ru n+ [32].Figure 11c shows that a fresh Pd-Ru membrane surface results in a dominant N 1s peak centered at an energy level of 399.8 eV corresponding to NH 3 , which may be introduced by the process of electroless plating.When the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to 10% NH 3 at 723 K, the N 1s spectrum is rather broad and exhibits at least three distinct peaks.It can be seen that the fitted N 1s spectrum reveals a main peak at around 399.8 eV, corresponding to NH 3 , and the peak at 397.8 eV is assigned to NH X (x = 1, 2) [33].The N 1s spectrum at 402 eV could not be identified.During NH 3 exposure, NH 3 molecules and other nitrogenous species are adsorbed on the surface of the Pd-Ru membrane, covering the hydrogen adsorption sites and thus inhibiting hydrogen permeation through the Pd-Ru membrane.Figure 11 shows the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Pd 3d, Ru 3p, and N 1s signals for the Pd-Ru membranes before and after exposure to 10% NH3 at 723 K for 6 h.All three elements, i.e., Pd, Ru, and N, are detected on the surface of the membrane.There are contributions from high valence states of Pd n+ and Ru n+ [32].Figure 11c shows that a fresh Pd-Ru membrane surface results in a dominant N 1s peak centered at an energy level of 399.8 eV corresponding to NH3, which may be introduced by the process of electroless plating.When the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to 10% NH3 at 723 K, the N 1s spectrum is rather broad and exhibits at least three distinct peaks.It can be seen that the fitted N 1s spectrum reveals a main peak at around 399.8 eV, corresponding to NH3, and the peak at 397.8 eV is assigned to NHX (x = 1, 2) [33].The N 1s spectrum at 402 eV could not be identified.During NH3 exposure, NH3 molecules and other nitrogenous species are adsorbed on the surface of the Pd-Ru membrane, covering the hydrogen adsorption sites and thus inhibiting hydrogen permeation through the Pd-Ru membrane.Figure 12 shows the XPS spectrum of the N 1s for Pd-Ru membranes after different treatments.Compared with the Pd-Ru membrane exposed to NH 3 , the species in the 397.8 eV and 402 eV range disappeared after pure hydrogen treatment, indicating that only physical adsorption but not chemical adsorption occurred after NH 3 exposure.When pure hydrogen was reintroduced, the dissociation and adsorption equilibrium of NH 3 on the membrane surface moved in the opposite direction, resulting in the almost complete desorption of physically adsorbed NH 3 and NH x (x = 1, 2).Therefore, the hydrogen fluxes all recovered 100% after pure hydrogen treatment.
Membranes 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW Figure 12 shows the XPS spectrum of the N 1s for Pd-Ru membranes after d treatments.Compared with the Pd-Ru membrane exposed to NH3, the species in t eV and 402 eV range disappeared after pure hydrogen treatment, indicating th physical adsorption but not chemical adsorption occurred after NH3 exposure.Wh hydrogen was reintroduced, the dissociation and adsorption equilibrium of NH membrane surface moved in the opposite direction, resulting in the almost comp sorption of physically adsorbed NH3 and NHx (x = 1, 2).Therefore, the hydroge all recovered 100% after pure hydrogen treatment.

Conclusions
In this study, we investigated the effect of NH3 concentration and temperatur hydrogen flux and subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen of the Pd-Ru membra results showed that Pd-Ru membranes exhibit excellent NH3 tolerance.The follow sults were observed: (1) The hydrogen flux of the Pd-Ru membrane remains 67-85% under exposu The combination of the hydrogen permeation test, SEM, XRD, and XPS results suggests that physical adsorption and concentration polarization of nitrogenous species occur simultaneously when the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to NH 3 .The competitive adsorption effect weakens and the extent of the concentration polarization effect increases with the temperature rising.No additional defects are formed on the Pd-Ru membrane during NH 3 exposure, and the deactivations of the membranes are reversible after pure hydrogen is introduced.When Pd-Ru membranes are exposed to NH 3 , the effective area decreases due to the adsorption of the nitrogenous species on the surfaces, and thus the hydrogen flux decreases.Pure hydrogen treatment results in almost complete desorption of physically adsorbed NH 3 and NH x (x = 1,2) and recovery of hydrogen flux.Otherwise, the high NH 3 concentration or the long exposure time may promote a diffusion of the Pd to the surface and thus enhance the adsorption of nitrogenous species.The enrichment of Ru on the membrane surface may have a unique effect on the NH 3 tolerance of the Pd-Ru membrane.

Conclusions
In this study, we investigated the effect of NH 3 concentration and temperature on the hydrogen flux and subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen of the Pd-Ru membranes.The results showed that Pd-Ru membranes exhibit excellent NH 3 tolerance.The following results were observed: (1) The hydrogen flux of the Pd-Ru membrane remains 67-85% under exposure to 1-10% NH 3 for 6 h at 723 K.A higher NH 3 concentration leads to greater inhibition of hydrogen flux, which can be fully recovered after the removal of NH 3 .
(2) The inhibition effect of NH 3 increases with the temperature increasing.The hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes rapidly decreases by 27-50% after 10% NH 3 exposure at 673-773 K. (3) A difference in relative hydrogen flux of 5.9% is observed at 773 K between 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 exposure, while a difference of 13.3% is observed at 673 K.The poisoning effect of NH 3 on Pd-Ru membranes is attributed to both competitive adsorption and concentration polarization.With increasing temperature, the competitive adsorption effect of NH 3 decreases and the concentration polarization effect increases.(4) The XPS analysis of the membranes after exposure to NH 3 showed that the reduction in hydrogen flux is attributed to the decrease in effective area due to the adsorption of the nitrogenous species on the surfaces during the dissociation process of hydrogen molecules.The poisoning effect of NH 3 on Pd-Ru membranes is completely reversible.

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 1.SEM images of the surface (a) and cross-section (b) of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membr

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.SEM images of the surface (a) and cross-section (b) of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane.

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 1.SEM images of the surface (a) and cross-section (b) of the as-deposited Pd-Ru m

Figure 2 .Figure 3 .
Figure 2. EDS analysis of the Pd-Ru membrane: (a) EDS surface Pd mapping; (b) EDS surface Ru mapping; (c) SEM surface image; (d) EDS line scans.The XRD pattern of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane is shown in Figure3.The diffractogram exhibits peaks of the Pd phase and Ru phase, indicating that the Pd-Ru membrane has been successfully prepared.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. XRD pattern of the as-deposited Pd-Ru membrane.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Hydrogen permeation flux of the Pd-Ru membrane as a function of pressu different temperatures.n is the pressure exponent.

3. 2 . 1 .
Figure 5 shows the variation in relative hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru memb to 1-10% NH3 at 0.1 MPa for 6 h at 723 K and the subsequent recovery in p The above test conditions are based on the conditions of NH3 decompositio convenient to compare with literature data."The relative hydrogen flux ( N H F

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Hydrogen permeation flux of the Pd-Ru membrane as a function of pressure difference at different temperatures.n is the pressure exponent.

3. 2 .
Figure 5 shows the variation in relative hydrogen flux of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 1-10% NH 3 at 0.1 MPa for 6 h at 723 K and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.The above test conditions are based on the conditions of NH 3 decomposition, which were convenient to compare with literature data."The relative hydrogen flux (F NH 3 H 2 /F original H 2 )

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Hydrogen flux inhibition of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to different concentration at 723 K and 0.1 MPa for 6 h and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Hydrogen flux inhibition of the Pd-Ru membrane exposed to 10% NH3 at 0.1 different temperatures and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Hydrogen flux inhibition of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to different concentrations of NH 3 at 723 K and 0.1 MPa for 6 h and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Hydrogen flux inhibition of Pd-Ru membranes exposed to different concentration at 723 K and 0.1 MPa for 6 h and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Hydrogen flux inhibition of the Pd-Ru membrane exposed to 10% NH3 at 0.1 different temperatures and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Hydrogen flux inhibition of the Pd-Ru membrane exposed to 10% NH 3 at 0.1 MPa for different temperatures and the subsequent recovery in pure hydrogen.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Relative hydrogen flux difference for Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH3 and at 0.1 MPa and different temperatures.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Relative hydrogen flux difference for Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 at 0.1 MPa and different temperatures.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Variation in relative hydrogen permeation flux with pressure for Pd-Ru membranes exposed to 10% NH 3 and 10% N 2 at 723 K.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Variation in relative hydrogen permeation flux with pressure for Pd-Ru memb posed to 10% NH3 and 10% N2 at 723 K.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Grazing incidence XRD pattern of Pd-Ru membranes after exposure to 10% NH at 723 K.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Grazing incidence XRD pattern of Pd-Ru membranes after exposure to 10% NH 3 for 6 h at 723 K.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.High-resolution XPS spectrum of Pd 3d, Ru 3p, and N 1s signals for Pd-Ru membranes.(a-c) Fresh membrane; (d-f) membrane after exposure to 10% NH3 at 723 K. Ru is the catalyst for the cracking of NH3.NH3 consecutively decomposes as NH2 → NH → N on the active site.During NH3 decomposition, NH3 is readily dissociated to give NH2 and NH2 is easily fragmented to form NH. When the Pd-Ru membrane is exposed to NH3, a portion of the active site becomes covered in NH3, whereas a small amount of NH3 decomposition should result in a certain coverage of NHX species.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.High-resolution XPS spectrum of Pd 3d, Ru 3p, and N 1s signals for Pd-Ru membranes.(a-c) Fresh membrane; (d-f) membrane after exposure to 10% NH 3 at 723 K. Ru is the catalyst for the cracking of NH 3 .NH 3 consecutively decomposes as NH 2 → NH → N on the active site.During NH 3 decomposition, NH 3 is readily dissociated to give

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.High-resolution XPS spectrum of N 1s signals for Pd-Ru membranes after differ ments.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.High-resolution XPS spectrum of N 1s signals for Pd-Ru membranes after different treatments.