Charged Gold Nanoparticles Promote In Vitro Proliferation in Nardostachys jatamansi by Differentially Regulating Chlorophyll Content, Hormone Concentration, and Antioxidant Activity

Nardostachys jatamansi is a critically endangered medicinal plant and endemic to the Himalayas, having high commercial demand globally. The accumulation of various secondary metabolites in its shoots and roots with antioxidant potential are well-documented in traditional as well as modern medicine systems. In the present study, we first attempted to investigate the impact of citrate (−ve charge, 11.1 ± 1.9 nm) and CTAB (+ve charge, 19.5 ± 3.2 nm) coated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on the in vitro proliferation and antioxidant activities of N. jatamansi. Both the nanoparticles differentially affected the morphological and biochemical parameters, chlorophyll content, internal hormone concentration, and antioxidant activities in a concentration-dependent (10–100 µM) manner. Vigorous shooting was observed in half strength MS medium supplemented with IAA (1 mg/L) with 60 µM citrate-AuNPs (46.4 ± 3.7 mm) and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs (42.2 ± 3.2 mm). Similarly, the maximum number of roots (5.00 ± 0.67 and 5.33 ± 0.58) and root length (29.9 ± 1.5 mm and 27.3 ± 4.8 mm) was reported in half-strength MS medium with IAA (1 mg/L) supplemented with 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs, respectively. In addition, plants growing on MS medium supplemented with 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs showed significantly enhanced photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids, and total chlorophyll), internal hormone concentration (GA3, IAA, and ABA), and antioxidant activities (total phenolics, flavonoids, DPPH, and SOD enzyme activity). Moreover, the transcript analysis of ANR1, ARF18, PLY9, SAUR28, GID1A, GRF1, SOD, and CAT further confirmed the role of 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs in the improvement in the growth and antioxidant activities of N. jatamansi. Bearing in mind the urgent requirements of the effective conservation measures of this endangered species, the present findings suggest the elicitation of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs would significantly improve the potential applications of N. jatamansi in the medicinal plant-based industry.


Introduction
Nardostachys jatamansi is a critically endangered, perennial medicinal herb of the family Caprifoliaceae (https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/50126627/50131395, accessed on 16 July 2014), and is restricted to the Alpine Himalayas at an altitude of 3000 m to 5000 m above sea level [1]. As an adaptation to the high altitude cold region, this species primarily propagates through its underground rhizomes and has a 3-4 year juvenile phase, followed by a short reproductive stage and poor seed germination rate [2]. Since it is not cultivated, the complete demand of raw material is fulfilled through the indiscriminate and

Synthesis of CTAB-AuNPs
The CTAB-AuNPs were synthesized using a one-step reaction according to the previous literature [15]. Briefly, 100 µL of 50 mM solution of gold (III) chloride trihydrate salt (HAuCl 4 ·3H 2 O) was prepared in Mili-Q water and added to 40 mL of CTAB (200 mM) in a dropwise manner. After this, 120 µL of pre-cooled ascorbic acid (~75 mM) was carefully added to this solution until the color of the solution turned from yellowish to colorless. Furthermore, 500 µL of 100 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution was added to this solution. Finally, the color of the solution started changing to wine red, which indicated the formation of CTAB-AuNPs. To remove the unreacted moieties, these NPs were then centrifuged thrice at 12,000 rpm for 20 min and redispersed in Mili-Q water for further characterization and stored at room temperature.

Characterization of Synthesized AuNPs
Absorption studies of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs were carried out using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 1 cm quartz cell and the total volume in each titration was made to 3 mL. The hydrodynamic diameter and net zeta potential of the prepared AuNPs was determined by using a DLS/Zeta sizer (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). All of the measurements were recorded by taking 1 mL of the NP solution. For analysis, readings were taken in three technical replicates per sample. For TEM analysis,~20 µL of the AuNP solution was directly drop-casted on the carbon coated copper grid and kept for drying overnight. The images were captured using Tecnai T20 twin, TEM 200 kV, FEI Netherlands.

Plant Material and Treatment Conditions
Shoot cultures of N. jatamansi were obtained from the Division of Biotechnology, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, India from the previous researchers and maintained in a previously standardized MS medium [16] with 0.75 mg/L TDZ and 0.5 mg/L kinetin under in vitro condition [5]. Established shoots of 0.5-1 cm height were sub-cultured on previously defined rooting medium containing half strength MS medium, 30 g/L sucrose, 8 g/L agar, and the pH was maintained at 5.75 ± 0.2. After autoclaving at 121 • C and 15 psi for 20 min, media were supplemented with 1 mg/L IAA and different concentrations (10-100 µM) of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs under an aseptic environment. Each treatment consisted of a biological triplicate with three explants per flask. The flasks were incubated at 25 • C ± 2, with a 16/8 h illumination period for 30 days.

Morphological Analysis
In vitro grown plants of N. jatamansi were harvested from the medium after 30 days. Photographs were taken and maximum root and shoot length was measured using ImageJ software. The number of roots per explant and the total plant biomass (fresh weight) were also measured manually.

Chlorophyll Estimation
Total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a and b, and total carotenoid content were measured using a method defined earlier [17]. Briefly, 0.1 g tissue was extracted in 80% acetone (Merck Millipore), centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min (LEGEND MICRO 21R centrifuge, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube, and extraction was repeated until the solution became colorless. The absorbance was measured at 663, 645, and 480 nm using UV-Visible spectrophotometer against a blank and photosynthetic pigments were calculated as described earlier [18].

Total Soluble Sugar Content
The anthrone method was used to analyze the total soluble sugar [19]. Briefly, 0.2 g of tissue was extracted with 1 mL of deionized water and boiled for 20 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min (LEGEND MICRO 21R centrifuge, Thermoscientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Furthermore, 1.8 mL of deionized water with 0.14% anthrone (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India) in 2 mL H 2 SO 4 (Merck Millipore, Mumbai, India) was mixed with 0.2 mL supernatant, boiled for 20 min, and the absorbance was measured at 620 nm. The glucose standard curve at 620 nm with the linear equation Y = 1.255X + 0.1133 was used to determine the total soluble sugar content in each sample.

Estimation of Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants
The methanolic extract was prepared using the control and treated leaves. A total of 100 mg of fresh leaf samples were mixed with 10 mL 80% methanol (Merck Millipore, Mumbai, India), and rotated overnight at 150 rpm. The resultant extract was centrifuged and filter sterilized for the further assessment of phenolics, flavonoids, and % DPPH inhibition. For the estimation of total phenolic content, 1 mL of extract was combined with 2.5 mL of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu (HiMedia, Mumbai, India, 25%) and 2 mL of 2% sodium carbonate (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), incubated for 30 min in the dark, and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm. The standard curve of gallic acid (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India ≥98.0%) with linear equation Y = 4.8744X − 0.0235 was used to express the results as the total phenolic content mg/g of the total extract [20]. The estimated total flavonoid content, the extract of 0.15 mL was mixed with 5% NaNO 2 (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), and 0.6 mL of distilled water, incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Furthermore, 0.045 mL of 10% AlCl 3 (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) was added to the mixture and incubated for 1 min, 0.3 mL of 1 N NaOH (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), and 0.3 mL of deionized water was further added after incubation, and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. The standard curve of quercetin (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India, ≥95%) with the linear equation Y = 2.954X + 0.0577 was used to express the results as the total flavonoids mg/g of the total extract [20].

DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
An extract of 0.5 mL was added to 3.5 mL of 1, 1-diphenyl-1-picrlhydrazyl (DPPH) (Merck Millipore, Mumbai, India, ≥90%), incubated for 30 min in the dark, and the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. Percent inhibition was calculated through decreasing absorbance by the following equation: Inhibition % = (Abs (blank) − Abs (sample))/(Abs (blank)) × 100 Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1962 5 of 18 As the morphological growth parameters and non-enzymatic antioxidant activity were significantly affected in the 10 µM and 60 µM concentrations of the citrate-AuNPs treated plants, and 40 µM concentration of the CTAB-AuNP treated plants, further endogenous hormones and transcript regulation were analyzed in the above said concentrations along with the control.

Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Enzyme Activity
For the determination of SOD enzyme activity, the control and treated leaf samples were homogenized in liquid nitrogen. Potassium phosphate buffer of 50 mM (pH 7.5) and EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) 0.5 mM was further added to the resultant mixture, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm (LEGEND MICRO 21R centrifuge, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 15 min, and the supernatant was stored at 4 • C. For activity analysis, 0.1 mL of extract was mixed with 75 µM NBT (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India), 14.5 mM methionine (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India), 50 mM sodium carbonate (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India), 0.1 mM EDTA, 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, and 4 µM riboflavin (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India), incubated under fluorescent light for 15 min. Extract free enzyme tube was considered as the control and the non-incubated mixture was used as the blank. After incubation, the absorbance was recorded at 560 nm and one unit of enzyme activity was defined as the reduction of absorbance by 50% in comparison to the control [21].

Endogenous Hormone Content Measurement
The quantitative analysis of IAA (indole-3-acetic acid), GA3 (gibberellic acid), and ABA (abscisic acid) was performed by the method as described earlier [22]. Briefly, 0.1 g leaf samples from the GNPs treated as well as the control plants were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and transferred to a 2 mL centrifuge tube. Each tube was filled with 0.5 mL of extraction solvent, consisting of 2-propanol/distilled water/concentrated HCl (2:1:0.002). Tubes were rotated at a speed of 100 rpm at 4 • C for 30 min. One mL of dichloromethane (Merck Millipore, Mumbai, India) was then added to the mixture and further rotated for 30 min at 4 • C. The resultant mixture was centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 5 min, and 0.9 mL of the lower phase was transferred into a centrifuge tube. The solvent mixture was then dried in a lyophilizer and the resultant samples were dissolved in 0.1 mL of methanol. A total of 50 µL of the samples was injected into the C18 reverse phase column for UPLC analysis.

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis
RNA was isolated in triplicate by the iRIS method [23] from the leaves of the citrate-AuNP and CTAB-AuNP treated plants along with the control. Isolated RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer. First-strand cDNAs were then synthesized using the Verso cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) as per the manufacturer's instruction. For expression analysis, the contigs of PYL9, ARF18, ANR1, SAUR28, GRF1, and GID1A were extracted from the online transcriptomic database of N. jatamansi (SRR1241890) and contigs of CAT1 and SOD1 were extracted from the SRR11184224 database [24] (Supplementary Figure S1). Further using these contig sequences, primers were designed through the primer 3 online software (Table 1). Finally, qRT-PCR in three biological replicates of each sample was completed using the ABI StepOne Real-Time PCR instrument by Applied Biosystems. A 10 µL of the reaction mix was prepared using the DyNAmo color flash SYBR green master mix Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA, as per the manufacturer's instructions. The amplification cycle comprised of 95 • C for 7 min initiation, followed by an amplification step of 40 cycles at 95 • C for 10 s, and 60 • C for 30 s; the melting curve was analyzed with default reaction cycles. The relative quantification method (2−ddCT) was used to quantify the variations using actin as an internal control according to the previously published literature [24].

Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses were carried out, and bar graphs were assembled using SIGMA PLOT v 14.5 scientific software. In all experiments, the significance levels were determined using the two-tailed Welch's t-test of p < 0.05 and examined between the control and treated plants [25,26].

Characterization of AuNPs
From the absorption studies, it was observed that the prepared citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs showed characteristic surface plasmon resonance peaks at 531 and 534 nm respectively, which confirmed the successful synthesis of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs. From the DLS and zeta potential studies, the hydrodynamic size of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs was found to be~14.9 ± 0.8 and 28.8 ± 0.7 nm, respectively. Zeta potential studies suggested a negative zeta potential of~−30.1 ± 2.2 mV due to the presence of citrate on the AuNP surface. Furthermore, CTAB-AuNPs showed a positive zeta potential of 28.7 ± 0.5 mV because of the capping of positively charged CTAB to the AuNP. Moreover, the polydispersity index (PDI) in both the AuNPs was found to be <0.3 (~0.25 for citrate-AuNPs and 0.21 for CTAB-AuNPs). All of these studies suggest the formation of stable colloidal solutions of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs (Table 2). TEM was conducted to evaluate the morphological characters and size of the synthesized AuNPs. The TEM micrographs showed the presence of uniformly distributed spherical AuNPs with sizes ranging from~9-12 nm for citrate-AuNPs and~17-23 nm for CTAB-AuNPs ( Figure 1).

Citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs Improves the Shoot and Root Proliferation and Biomass
Shoot and root proliferation was significantly affected by both the citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs in a concentration dependent manner ( Figure 2). After 30 days, it was observed that 10 µM concentrations of the citrate-AuNP treated in vitro plants had a significantly reduced root number (0.66 ± 0.33) and length (5.6 ± 1.1 mm) compared to the control plants, but there was no significant effect on the shoots. However, on increasing the concentration, the maximum root number was observed at 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs (5.33 ± 0.58), followed by 60 µM citrate-AuNPs (5.00 ± 0.67). However, the maximum root length (29.9 ± 1.5 mm) and shoot length (46.4 ± 3.7 mm) was recorded at 60 µM citrate-AuNPs followed by 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs (27.3 ± 4.8 mm and 42.2 ± 3.2 mm, respectively) and reduced thereafter at higher concentrations ( Figure 3). In addition, both citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs also significantly affected the total plant biomass, among which the minimum biomass was recorded in 10 µM citrate-AuNPs (1350 ± 31.4 mg), while the maximum biomass was recorded at the 60 µM citrate-AuNP (5460 ± 91.1 mg) and 40 µM concentration of the CTAB-AuNP (5480 ± 54.2 mg) treated plants.

Citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs Improves the Shoot and Root Proliferation and Biomass
Shoot and root proliferation was significantly affected by both the citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs in a concentration dependent manner ( Figure 2). After 30 days, it was observed that 10 µM concentrations of the citrate-AuNP treated in vitro plants had a significantly reduced root number (0.66 ± 0.33) and length (5.6 ± 1.1 mm) compared to the control plants, but there was no significant effect on the shoots. However, on increasing the concentration, the maximum root number was observed at 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs (5.33 ± 0.58), followed by 60 µM citrate-AuNPs (5.00 ± 0.67). However, the maximum root length (29.9 ± 1.5 mm) and shoot length (46.4 ± 3.7 mm) was recorded at 60 µM citrate-AuNPs followed by 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs (27.3 ± 4.8 mm and 42.2 ± 3.2 mm, respectively) and reduced thereafter at higher concentrations ( Figure 3). In addition, both citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs also significantly affected the total plant biomass, among which the minimum biomass was recorded in 10 µM citrate-AuNPs (1350 ± 31.4 mg), while the maximum biomass was recorded at the 60 µM citrate-AuNP (5460 ± 91.1 mg) and 40 µM concentration of the CTAB-AuNP (5480 ± 54.2 mg) treated plants.
Similarly, the carotenoid contents were also differentially accumulated after the treatment of both citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs (Figure 4c). The carotenoid content was significantly reduced (251.84 ± 10.23 mg/g fresh weight) at the 10 µM citrate-AuNP concentration compared to the control (525.55 ± 8.81 mg/g fresh weight). In contrast, a significantly higher content of carotenoids was observed at a 60 µM concentration of citrate-AuNPs (891.28 ± 14.73 mg/g fresh weight) and at a 40 µM concentration of CTAB-AuNPs (895.28 ± 30.57 mg/g fresh weight). The total soluble sugar content was also regulated in a concentration dependent manner of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs (Figure 4d). The minimum total soluble sugar content (1.71 ± 0.06 mg/g fresh weight) was observed at a 10 µM citrate-AuNP concentration, while the maximum content was observed at a 60 µM citrate-AuNP concentration (5.96 ± 0.14 mg/g fresh weight) followed by a 40 µM CTAB-AuNP concentration (5.26 ± 0.05 mg/g fresh weight) compared to the control (3.86 ± 0.1 mg/g fresh weight).

Citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs Modulates Genes Regulating Hormone Content and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities
The relative expression of transcripts regulating the growth, hormonal profile, and antioxidant activity were differentially regulated by citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs ( Figure 6). It was observed that the expression of the ABA receptor, PYL9, increased 1.5-fold under the 10 µM citrate-AuNPs, whereas it was severely downregulated (3-fold) under the 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and the 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs in comparison to the control. However, small auxin upregulated RNA, SAUR28 showed no variation in the transcript expression under both 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs, but its expression was significantly declined under the 10 µM citrate-AuNP treatment. In contrast, the auxin response factor, ARF18 was significantly downregulated under both the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP concentrations, while significant upregulation was observed under the 10 µM concentrations of citrate-AuNPs. Furthermore, the MADS box transcription factor (ANR1), GA3 receptor (GID1A), growth regulating factor (GRF1), SOD, and CAT were significantly upregulated under both the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP concentration, whereas they were severely downregulated under the 10 µM concentration of citrate-AuNPs in comparison to the control.

Citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs Modulates Genes Regulating Hormone Content and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities
The relative expression of transcripts regulating the growth, hormonal profile, and antioxidant activity were differentially regulated by citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs ( Figure 6). It was observed that the expression of the ABA receptor, PYL9, increased 1.5fold under the 10 µM citrate-AuNPs, whereas it was severely downregulated (3-fold) under the 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and the 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs in comparison to the control. However, small auxin upregulated RNA, SAUR28 showed no variation in the transcript expression under both 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs, but its expression was significantly declined under the 10 µM citrate-AuNP treatment. In contrast, the auxin response factor, ARF18 was significantly downregulated under both the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP concentrations, while significant upregulation was observed under the 10 µM concentrations of citrate-AuNPs. Furthermore, the MADS box transcription factor (ANR1), GA3 receptor (GID1A), growth regulating factor (GRF1), SOD, and CAT were significantly upregulated under both the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP concentration, whereas they were severely downregulated under the 10 µM concentration of citrate-AuNPs in comparison to the control.

Discussion
In past few years, the application of nanoparticles has immensely increased in agriculture and plant tissue culture for the commercial production of various plants and their

Discussion
In past few years, the application of nanoparticles has immensely increased in agriculture and plant tissue culture for the commercial production of various plants and their secondary metabolites [27,28]. The size and concentration of nanoparticles could play an imperative role in growth and development in a species-specific manner. A model was predicted to quantify engineered gold nanoparticles in water (0.14 µg/L) and soil (5.99 µg/kg) [29]. Other than a few studies, the overall toxic effect of gold nanoparticles was observed to be higher than 100 mg/L with particle sizes less than 5 nm [30], though the underlying mechanism is still not clearly understood. However, surface modifications could stabilize nanomaterials, though under natural conditions, the chemistry of the coating can change, affecting the properties and biocompatibility of nanoparticles [13]. The majority of studies on the toxic effect of nanoparticles have focused on animals and bacteria, and is significantly less available on plants [30]. Furthermore, the mechanism for the biological action of nanoparticles in plant development and antioxidant activity is yet to be determined. Therefore, it is very important to explore the effect of metallic as well as non-metallic nanoparticles on plants, especially medicinal plants. The size and concentration of nanoparticles could be imperative in the growth and development in a species-specific manner. Nanoparticles could enter the plasma membrane by creating some nano-scale holes of about 15-40 nm in diameter [31]. Although nanoparticles can aggregate in the growth medium, surface coatings are used and can play a key role in their stabilization. The physical interaction of nanoparticles with a plasma membrane can be influenced by positive or negative coatings. Logically, negatively charged nanoparticles should accumulate less on the cell surface due to electrostatic repulsion compared to the positively charged nanoparticles due to electrostatic attraction. However, negatively charged nanoparticles can overcome the hindrance by strong covalent bindings [32], and pass the cell membrane. The present study reflects that the smaller particle size, irrespective of the charge, may overcome electrostatic repulsion, and the metal ion gradient difference inside and outside the cell may play the key role in nanoparticle internalization.
In the present study, the application of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs significantly increased the shoot multiplication, root proliferation, total plant biomass, photosynthetic pigments, enzymatic, and non-enzymatic antioxidant levels and endogenous hormone levels in a dose dependent manner under in vitro conditions in N. jatamansi. It was observed earlier that green-synthesized biogenic Ca-AuNPs and PEGMA-AuNPs enhanced the fresh weight, dry weight, and total biomass in banana under in vitro conditions [33]. Furthermore, after 10 weeks of in vitro culture of Lamprocapnos spectabilis, treatment of AuNPs increased the shoot number, but reduced rooting [34]. Moreover, 10 mg/L of citrate-AuNPs were previously shown to influence all of the growth parameters of Arabidopsis [35]. In our findings, we observed that all the growth parameters as well as the physiological and biochemical activities were enhanced at an optimum concentration of 60 µM of citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM of CTAB-AuNPs, whereas negative regulation was observed at a 10 µM concentration of citrate-AuNPs. At a lower concentration, nanoparticles might also hinder the uptake of other nutrients and on increasing the concentration above the optimum due to a higher concentration of nanoparticles, no significant growth was observed. It was also reported that negatively charged gold nanoparticles might not be uptaken by the plant at lower doses [11]. Previous findings suggest that auxin works in an acid growth hypothesis, reducing the pH of the cell wall for cell elongation [36]; this might have helped the uptake of citrate-AuNPs. It was also confirmed by SAUR28 gene expression, which promotes auxin-induced cell wall loosening through acidification by activating PM H + -ATPase and inhibiting PP2C.D family protein phosphatases, leading to cell expansion and enhanced solute uptake [36,37]. This gene expression somewhere also suggests that a lower concentration of citrate-AuNPs limits IAA and other nutrient uptake, leading to the retardation of growth and root development, which might be due to the accumulation of nanoparticles at the base of the plant. ARF family transcripts are known to regulate plant growth and stress tolerance; different sets of ARFs such as ARF10, 16, 17, and 18 are known for negatively regulation of root growth in plants, out of these, ARF18 also has abiotic stress tolerance activity [38,39], thus we chose ARF18 over the other ARFs. The decrease in the transcript levels of ARF18 was also observed under the 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs, which were similar to that in earlier studies [40,41]. Therefore, an increase in the shoot and root proliferation by the downregulation of ARF18 is because it inhibits downstream auxins by forming homodimers, showing in response, a negative correlation with plant growth [42]. Moreover, the transcript levels of MADS-box transcription factor ANR1 was found to be increased with the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treatment. It was reported by previous researchers that ANR1 acts as a key player in the root and shoot development by promoting auxin biosynthesis, transport, and accumulation, aside from influencing nitrate assimilation, amino acid metabolism, glycolysis, and TCA cycle [43,44]. A higher absorption of nitrate further improved the synthesis of phenolic compounds [45,46]. Citrate-coated gold nanoparticles positively influenced all of the growth parameters of Arabidopsis at a concentration of 10 mg/L [35].
Chlorophyll content is used to detect the photosynthetic performance of the plant, ultimately leading to overall plant growth and development. In addition, carotenoids prevent from photo-oxidation by absorbing excess light that is not absorbed by the chlorophyll pigments. Since chlorophyll and carotenoids are vital biomolecules for photosynthesis, understanding the alterations in their contents would provide a deep insight into plant adaptation to high altitude regions. In the current findings, the photosynthetic pigments (i.e., chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids) showed a remarkable increase under the 60 µM citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM CTAB-AuNPs. This enhancement in the photosynthetic pigment content in the AuNP treated plants may be due to the upregulation of ROS-scavenging enzymes, which help detoxify ROS radicals [28]. The total soluble sugars including glucose, fructose, and sucrose are known to play key roles in plant metabolism, growth, and maintain ROS balance inside the cell [47]. In our study, the total soluble sugar content increased under the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treated plants. This suggests that the nanoparticles induced cellular metabolism in a positive manner, which subsequently led to growth enhancement of the plant. An increase in the chlorophyll content and total soluble sugar was observed in in vitro grown banana under Caralluma tuberculata AuNPs (Ca-AuNPs) and polyethylene glycol methacrylate coated Ca-AuNP nanocomposites (PEGMA-AuNPs) [33].
Phenolics are important constituents of the plant cell, having redox properties to facilitate antioxidant activity, and they are the second largest group of secondary metabolites in plants. Similarly, flavonoids are secondary metabolites present inside the vacuole, and are responsible for plant development, photo protection, and antioxidant activity. Phenolic and flavonoid compounds prevent cells from oxidation by electrolyzing and purifying the ROS generated during the photosynthetic electron transport process [48]. In this work, the pattern of total phenolic content and flavonoid content increased in a concentrationdependent manner of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs. Phenolic biosynthesis primarily occurs through the arogenate/shikimate pathway generating phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan, which are precursors of auxin biosynthesis [46]. It was observed that nanoparticles stimulate phenolic compound synthesis, leading to an increase in systemic acquired resistance [49]. The DPPH radical scavenging activity is widely used to determine the antioxidant activity of the plant. Our results are in accordance with [33], where there was increased phenol, flavonoid, and DPPH radical activity under the Ca-AuNPs and PEGMA-AuNPs in the in vitro grown banana. Other researchers under in vitro conditions also observed similar results [19,50]. SOD provides a first line of defense molecule against the oxidative stress in cells, catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide radical (O 2 •− ) into hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) [51]. SOD is the primary enzyme of ROS scavenging, which converts free radical oxygen to H 2 O 2 , and then CAT further converts this H 2 O 2 into water and oxygen to mitigate the toxic effects. In this study, SOD activity was reported to be higher in the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treatments. Enhanced SOD and peroxidase activities were observed earlier in the AuNP treated callus cultures of Prunella vulgaris [19]. The relative expression levels of genes regulating the SOD and CAT activity also showed a higher expression under the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treatment. It was reported earlier that long-term exposure of different organs of rats with AuNPs increased the SOD and CAT activity, leading to a reduction in energy metabolism [52].
Endogenous hormones mainly play an acute role in the growth and stress adaptation of plants under critical conditions. Endogenous ABA is a growth retardant that leads to senescence and is also known to regulate stress adaptation in plants. A major form of endogenous auxin is IAA, and it is known to play a major role in primary root initiation. In our study, we assessed the endogenous IAA, GA3, and ABA levels to correlate the growth of gold nanoparticle treated N. jatamansi. The 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treatments enhanced the level of endogenous hormones GA3 and IAA, where there was increased plant growth. Similar to our results, Musa cultures supplemented with Ca-AuNPs and PEGMA-AuNPs showed increased IAA levels, in correlation with increased growth [33]. A positive correlation of endogenous IAA and GA with the rooting and plant growth of Gerbera jamesonii was also observed under the treatment of Se-NPs [53]. Furthermore, the expression of GRF1 and GID1A was also found to increase under the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treatments, which showed that AuNPs regulate the endogenous hormone levels in in vitro plant growth. It was previously shown that GRF1 is a transcriptional activator that interacts with GIF (GRF INTERACTING FACTOR) and DELLA transcription factors to modulate cell proliferation, leading to leaf expansion [54,55]. Functional studies also revealed the key regulatory role of GRF1 in plant growth and development, cell signaling, and phytohormone biosynthesis [56]. Similarly, it was observed that DELLA proteins interact with GA receptor GID1A proteins. Gibberellins induce stem elongation through binding to its receptor GID1A, which after binding to GA represses the expression of the GA inhibitor DELLA [57]. The DELLA domain mediates GA-dependent GAI interaction and GAI DELLA functions as the receiver for the activated GID1A receptor, thus promoting gibberellic acid signaling in plants [58]. The ROS showed positive regulation with ABA signaling, which plays a key role in the plant's lateral root development in the exposure to environmental stress [59]. ABA was found to regulate root growth in a concentration dependent manner, where a higher concentration reduced the root growth and lower concentration induced the root growth [60]. A higher expression of RCAR1/PYL9, a cytoplasm and nuclear ABA receptor, was also found with the 60 µM citrate-AuNP and 40 µM CTAB-AuNP treatments in the present study. It was previously shown that PYL9 directly interacted with MYB77 and MYB44, and regulated auxin responsive genes to improve primary root growth and lateral root formation [61]. Further detailed studies on the mechanism of action of citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs will provide a much clearer arena of the effect of AuNPs in plant growth and development.

Conclusions
From the present investigation, it can be concluded that applying 60 µM oof citrate-AuNPs and 40 µM of CTAB-AuNPs in the in vitro culture medium will enhance the shoot and root proliferation as well as the antioxidant properties of N. jatamansi in a concentration dependent manner. The outcomes of the photosynthetic pigments, antioxidant enzyme activities, phenolic compounds, internal hormone levels, and transcript analysis clearly indicated that the citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs modulated the antioxidant mechanism and production of phenolic derivatives, thus restraining ROS production. Furthermore, the datasets obtained from the in vitro experimental findings clearly indicate that citrate-AuNPs and CTAB-AuNPs stimulate genes regulating endogenous hormone levels and plant growth. Thus, the current investigations revealed that charged gold nanoparticles can be further used in plant tissue culture medium for rapid and efficient micropropagation and for the mitigation of ROS production under high altitude conditions. Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox11101962/s1, Figure S1: Contig sequences of Nardostachys jatamansi (24). PYL9, ARF18, ANR1, SAUR28, GRF1, and GID1A were extracted from the SRR1241890 database. CAT1 and SOD1 were extracted from the SRR11184224 database.