Purification, Physicochemical Properties, and Antioxidant Activities of Two Low-Molecular-Weight Polysaccharides from Ganoderma leucocontextum Fruiting Bodies

Two low-molecular-weight polysaccharides (GLP-1 and GLP-2) were purified from Ganoderma leucocontextum fruiting bodies, and their physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities were investigated and compared in this study. The results showed that GLP-1 and GLP-2 were mainly composed of mannose, glucose, galactose, xylose, and arabinose, with weight-average molecular weights of 6.31 and 14.07 kDa, respectively. Additionally, GLP-1 and GLP-2 had a similar chain conformation, crystal structure, and molecular surface morphology. Moreover, GLP-1 exhibited stronger antioxidant activities than GLP-2 in five different assays: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), hydroxyl radical, superoxide anion radical, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and oxygen radical antioxidant capacity (ORAC). The main linkage types of GLP-1 were found to be →4)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, →4)-β-D-Glcp-(1→, →3)-β-D-Glcp-(1→, →6)-β-D-Galp-(1→, →6)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, →4,6)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, and Glcp-(1→ by methylation analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. In addition, GLP-1 could protect NIH3T3 cells against tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP)-induced oxidative damage by increasing catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities, elevating the glutathione/oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG) ratio, and decreasing the malondialdehyde (MDA) level. These findings indicated that GLP-1 could be explored as a potential antioxidant agent for application in functional foods.


Introduction
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), superoxide anion, and hydroxyl free radicals, are generated during normal cellular metabolism [1]. Under normal physiological conditions, the production and elimination of ROS are usually balanced by various antioxidant compounds and enzymes. However, under pathological conditions, ROS excessively accumulate and attack proteins, lipids, and DNA, which in turn causes oxidative damage to tissues and organs [2,3]. Such oxidative injuries promote the development of various human diseases, including cardiovascular disease, age-related disorders, metabolic disease, cancer, and other diseases [4,5].

Evaluation for In Vitro Antioxidant Activities 2.6.1. ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay
The antioxidant capacity of polysaccharide samples in the reaction with ABTS radical cation (ABTS •+ ) was determined by the method of Re et al. [25] with some modifications, applied to a 96-well microplate assay. First, ABTS •+ was produced by reacting 7 mM ABTS stock solution with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate (final concentration) and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark at room temperature for 16 h before use. The ABTS •+ solution was diluted with PBS to obtain an absorbance of 0.70 (±0.05) at 734 nm by mixing with an equal volume of ultrapure water. Then, 100 µL of appropriately diluted samples was mixed with 100 µL of ABTS •+ solution. The reaction mixture was incubated in the dark for 6 min at 30 • C. The absorbance at 734 nm was read using a VersaMax ELISA microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and Vc was used as a positive control. The ABTS •+ radical scavenging rate was calculated using the following formula: ABTS •+ radical scavenging activity (%) = [(A control − A sample )/A control ] × 100 (1) where A sample is the absorbance of the tested sample and A control is the absorbance of the ultrapure water instead of the tested sample. The hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity of polysaccharide samples was evaluated on a microplate analytical assay according to a previous method [26] with some modifications. First, 50 µL of ferrous sulfate (1.5 mM) and 50 µL of H 2 O 2 (0.01%) were mixed with 100 µL of samples. Finally, 50 µL of 1,10-phenanthroline (1.5 mM) was added. The reaction mixture was then incubated in the dark for 30 min at 37 • C, and the absorbance was measured at 536 nm. Vc was used as a positive control. The hydroxyl radical scavenging rate was calculated using the following formula: Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity (%) = (A sample − A control )/(A 0 − A control ) × 100 (2) where A sample is the absorbance of the tested sample, A control is the absorbance of the ultrapure water instead of the tested sample, and A 0 is the absorbance of the ultrapure water instead of H 2 O 2 and the tested sample.

Superoxide Anion Scavenging Assay
The superoxide anion scavenging activity of polysaccharide samples was evaluated on a microplate analytical assay according to the method of Li et al. [27] with some modifications. First, 100 µL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 375 µM NADH and 125 µM NBT was mixed with 100 µL of samples. After the addition of 16.5 µM PMS (50 µL), the mixture was incubated in the dark for 5 min at 25 • C. The absorbance was recorded at 560 nm, and Vc was used as a positive control. The superoxide anion scavenging rate was calculated using the following formula: Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity (%) = [(A control − A sample )/A control ] × 100 (3) where A sample is the absorbance of the tested sample and A control is the absorbance of the ultrapure water instead of the tested sample.

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay
The ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was performed according to the method of Benzie and Strain [28] with slight modifications, applied to a 96-well microplate assay. The working FRAP reagent was made 1 h prior to the assay by mixing 300 mM acetate buffer pH 3.6 (1.896 g CH 3 COONa and 16 mL CH 3 COOH per liter), 10 mM TPTZ solution in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl 3 solution in ultrapure water in the ratio of 10:1:1. The FRAP reagent was warmed to 37 • C before the assay. Then, 150 µL of FRAP reagent was mixed with 50 µL of appropriately diluted samples or Trolox. The reaction mixture was incubated in the dark for 4 min at 37 • C, and the absorbance was measured at 593 nm. Trolox equivalents were calculated using a calibration curve prepared with Trolox (0-40 µM, final concentration). Results were expressed as µmol/g Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC).

Oxygen Radical Antioxidant Capacity Assay
The oxygen radical antioxidant capacity (ORAC) assay of polysaccharide samples was performed according to a previous method [29] with slight modifications. The fluorescence measurement was performed at 37 • C on a SpectraMax i3x multi-mode microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The fluorescence intensity was recorded every minute for 60 min at an emission wavelength of 520 nm and an excitation wavelength of 485 nm. Trolox equivalents were calculated using a calibration curve prepared with Trolox (0-4 µM, final concentration). The final ORAC values were expressed as µmol/g TEAC. Before the investigation of the protective effect of GLP-1 on tBHP-induced cellular oxidative damage, NIH3T3 cells were treated with various tBHP concentrations (50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 µM) for 24 h to confirm an appropriate concentration in this cell model. Briefly, NIH3T3 cells were seeded on a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 10 4 cells/well and incubated for 24 h at 37 • C in 5% CO 2 . Subsequently, the cells were treated with different concentrations of GLP-1 (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL) or Trolox (80 µM) and co-cultured with 100 µM of tBHP. The blank control group and model group were treated with DMEM and 100 µM of tBHP, respectively. After 24 h of treatment, the cell culture supernatants were collected for LDH release assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell viability was measured with 200 µL of serum-free DMEM containing CCK-8 solution (5 µL). The plate was incubated for another 2 h at 37 • C and the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm. The cell viability was expressed as the percentage of the blank control group.

Determination of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species
The intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) of NIH3T3 cells were determined using an ROS assay kit. First, NIH3T3 cells (5 × 10 4 cells/well) were seeded on a 24-well plate and incubated for 24 h at 37 • C in 5% CO 2 . After 6 h of various treatments as described above, the medium was removed, and 0.5 mL of serum-free DMEM containing DCFH-DA (10 µM) was added into each well. The plate was transferred to the incubator for 30 min, and then washed with DPBS three times. Fluorescence images were captured using an EVOS FL Auto 2 microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bothell, WA, USA). The fluorescence intensity of each image was quantified by ImageJ software. 2.7.4. Determination of MDA, GSH, GSSG, CAT, and GSH-Px Levels First, NIH3T3 cells (6 × 10 5 cells/well) were seeded on 60 mm 2 culture dishes and incubated for 24 h at 37 • C in 5% CO 2 . After 24 h of different treatments as described above, the cells were collected and the cell lysate supernatant was used in the next analysis. The protein concentrations were quantified by the BCA assay kit. The contents of MDA, GSH, and GSSG were measured with microscale MDA and total GSH/GSSG assay kits. The activities of CAT and GSH-Px were analyzed by CAT and GSH-Px assay kits. These experiments were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical Analysis
The results were presented as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). The statistical significance of difference was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test using SAS 9.2 software. Origin 9.2 software was used for illustration.

Purification, Component Analysis and Molecular Weights of GLP-1 and GLP-2
Using an ultrafiltration instrument, the water-soluble CGLP was separated into three fractions: 5-10 kDa (CGLP-1), 10-100 kDa (CGLP-2), and >100 kDa (CGLP-3). The structural characteristics and immunomodulatory activity of purified CGLP-3 have been investigated in our previous study [20]. In the current study, to obtain homogenized polysaccharides, both CGLP-1 and CGLP-2 were subjected to a DEAE-Sepharose fast-flow column and eluted with ultrapure water and 0.1-0.5 M NaCl ( Figure 1A,B). The fractions obtained from 0.1 M NaCl, which were the highest yield, were further purified by a Sephacryl S-300 HR column ( Figure 1C,D). The obtained GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited a single peak in the GPC chromatogram ( Figure 1E,F).
The chemical compositions and molecular weights of GLP-1 and GLP-2 are presented in Table 1. The total carbohydrate contents of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were 73.36% and 72.45%, respectively. Both GLP-1 (0.03%) and GLP-2 (0.08%) contained very low protein, suggesting that protein was almost entirely removed by the Sevage reagent. According to the HPGPC analysis, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of GLP-1 was calculated to be 6.31 kDa, while that of GLP-2 was calculated to be 14.07 kDa according to the calibration curve for the standard. The polydispersity indexes (Mw/weight-average molecular weight (Mn)) of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were 1.21 and 1.40, respectively, indicating that both GLP-1 and GLP-2 had a relatively homogeneous molecular weight.

Purification, Component Analysis and Molecular Weights of GLP-1 and GLP-2
Using an ultrafiltration instrument, the water-soluble CGLP was separated into three fractions: 5-10 kDa (CGLP-1), 10-100 kDa (CGLP-2), and >100 kDa (CGLP-3). The structural characteristics and immunomodulatory activity of purified CGLP-3 have been investigated in our previous study [20]. In the current study, to obtain homogenized polysaccharides, both CGLP-1 and CGLP-2 were subjected to a DEAE-Sepharose fast-flow column and eluted with ultrapure water and 0.1-0.5 M NaCl ( Figure 1A,B). The fractions obtained from 0.1 M NaCl, which were the highest yield, were further purified by a Sephacryl S-300 HR column ( Figure 1C,D). The obtained GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited a single peak in the GPC chromatogram ( Figure 1E,F).
The chemical compositions and molecular weights of GLP-1 and GLP-2 are presented in Table 1. The total carbohydrate contents of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were 73.36% and 72.45%, respectively. Both GLP-1 (0.03%) and GLP-2 (0.08%) contained very low protein, suggesting that protein was almost entirely removed by the Sevage reagent. According to the HPGPC analysis, the weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of GLP-1 was calculated to be 6.31 kDa, while that of GLP-2 was calculated to be 14.07 kDa according to the calibration curve for the standard. The polydispersity indexes (Mw/weight-average molecular weight (Mn)) of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were 1.21 and 1.40, respectively, indicating that both GLP-1 and GLP-2 had a relatively homogeneous molecular weight.

FT-IR Spectra of GLP-1 and GLP-2
The FT-IR spectra showed that both GLP-1 and GLP-2 contained the typical absorption peaks of polysaccharides ( Figure S1). The characteristic peak at 3392.4 cm −1 was due to the O-H stretching vibration, and the peak at 2925.6 cm −1 was due to the C-H stretching vibration [31,32]. The absorption peak around 1726.1 cm −1 was attributed to the stretching vibrations of carboxylic groups [33]. The polysaccharide GLP-1 had a weaker

FT-IR Spectra of GLP-1 and GLP-2
The FT-IR spectra showed that both GLP-1 and GLP-2 contained the typical absorption peaks of polysaccharides ( Figure S1). The characteristic peak at 3392.4 cm −1 was due to the O-H stretching vibration, and the peak at 2925.6 cm −1 was due to the C-H stretching vibration [31,32]. The absorption peak around 1726.1 cm −1 was attributed to the stretching vibrations of carboxylic groups [33]. The polysaccharide GLP-1 had a weaker absorption peak at 1726.1 cm −1 than GLP-2, which might be due to the lower uronic acid content of GLP-1 (described above). The absorption peak at 1645.4 cm −1 for GLP-1 and that at 1658.2 cm −1 for GLP-2 indicated the presence of associated water [34,35]. The bands in the range of 1200-1500 cm −1 probably corresponded to the deformation vibrations of C-H and bending vibrations of C-OH [36]. The intense bands at 1154.7, 1076.5, and 1040.0 cm −1 indicated the pyranose form of glucosyl residues [37,38]. In addition, the characteristic absorptions at 835.4 and 900.3 cm −1 suggested the presence of α-and β-type glycosidic linkage, respectively [6,39].

Chain Conformation and Crystalline Characteristics of GLP-1 and GLP-2
Polysaccharides with a triple-helix structure can form complexes with Congo red, so that the λ max of the complex will undergo a bathochromic shift in comparison to Congo red [40]. The result of the Congo red experiment is shown in Figure 3A. No redshifts of the λ max were observed in the concentration range of 0.05-0.5 M, indicating that no triple-helix structure existed in GLP-1 and GLP-2. A previous study also reported that no triple-helix conformation existed in polysaccharides extracted from G. lucidum by ultrasound and hot water [8].
Polysaccharides with a triple-helix structure can form complexes with Congo red, so that the λmax of the complex will undergo a bathochromic shift in comparison to Congo red [40]. The result of the Congo red experiment is shown in Figure 3A. No redshifts of the λmax were observed in the concentration range of 0.05-0.5 M, indicating that no triple-helix structure existed in GLP-1 and GLP-2. A previous study also reported that no triple-helix conformation existed in polysaccharides extracted from G. lucidum by ultrasound and hot water [8].
The crystalline structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were examined by XRD. As shown in Figure 3B, the diffraction curves had amorphous peak regions at the angles (2θ) around 20° and contained no sharp peaks, suggesting that GLP-1 and GLP-2 were low-crystallinity amorphous polymers [41]. Similar diffraction peaks at about 20° were also observed in the polysaccharides from G. lucidum [42] and Bletilla striata [43].

Morphological Properties of GLP-1 and GLP-2
AFM has been widely used to characterize the morphological properties of biological macromolecules including polysaccharides [44]. The planar and three-dimensional structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 are shown in Figure 3C,D. The network structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 in aqueous solution were observed. The height and width of the chain were in the ranges of 0.5-3.5 nm and 70-240 nm, respectively. The theoretical diameter of a single polysaccharide chain is generally 0.1-1.0 nm [45]. These results suggested that the polysaccharide units could aggregate in aqueous solution, a behavior also exhibited The crystalline structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were examined by XRD. As shown in Figure 3B, the diffraction curves had amorphous peak regions at the angles (2θ) around 20 • and contained no sharp peaks, suggesting that GLP-1 and GLP-2 were low-crystallinity amorphous polymers [41]. Similar diffraction peaks at about 20 • were also observed in the polysaccharides from G. lucidum [42] and Bletilla striata [43].

Morphological Properties of GLP-1 and GLP-2
AFM has been widely used to characterize the morphological properties of biological macromolecules including polysaccharides [44]. The planar and three-dimensional structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 are shown in Figure 3C,D. The network structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 in aqueous solution were observed. The height and width of the chain were in the ranges of 0.5-3.5 nm and 70-240 nm, respectively. The theoretical diameter of a single polysaccharide chain is generally 0.1-1.0 nm [45]. These results suggested that the polysaccharide units could aggregate in aqueous solution, a behavior also exhibited by polysaccharides from Lentinus edodes [46]. Giannotti et al. [47] have demonstrated the hydrogen-bonded water-bridged nature of the network structure of polysaccharide chains. Li et al. [48] pointed out that hydrogen bonding triggered the molecular aggregation of polysaccharides because the hydroxyl groups on the chains provided strong inter-and intra-molecular interactions with each other or water molecules. Therefore, the network structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were probably due to hydrogen bonding interactions.

Antioxidant Activities of GLP-1 and GLP-2 In Vitro
Nowadays, many antioxidant methods are widely used to screen antioxidant compounds, but various analytical methods have different mechanisms and suitability. Therefore, a single method cannot accurately and quantitatively assess the antioxidant capacity, and two or more methods with different mechanisms of antioxidant action are suggested [49,50]. In this study, ABTS, hydroxyl radical, superoxide anion radical, FRAP, and ORAC assays were carried out to compare the antioxidant activities of GLP-1 and GLP-2.
As shown in Figure 4, both GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited obvious ABTS, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion radical scavenging activities in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, the IC 50 values of GLP-1 for ABTS, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion radical were 0.56 mg/mL, 1.32 mg/mL, and 0.76 mg/mL, respectively, which were lower than those of GLP-2 (1.18 mg/mL, 2.78 mg/mL, and 1.34 mg/mL). However, the radical scavenging abilities of Vc were relatively higher than those of GLP-1 and GLP-2. For FRAP and ORAC assays ( Figure 4D,E), the TEAC values of GLP-1 were 6.85 µmol/g and 84.8 µmol/g, respectively, which were 2.77 and 1.61 times larger than those of GLP-2 (3.59 µmol/g and 52.6 µmol/g, respectively). The TEAC values of GLP-1 and GLP-2 from the FRAP assay were lower than those from the ORAC assay. On one hand, this was due to the different reaction mechanisms of these two methods. On the other hand, both GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited weak reducing power, which was consistent with the results from a previous study [51]. The results of five antioxidant methods consistently indicated that GLP-1 had better antioxidant activity than GLP-2.
gation of polysaccharides because the hydroxyl groups on the chains provided strong inter-and intra-molecular interactions with each other or water molecules. Therefore, the network structures of GLP-1 and GLP-2 were probably due to hydrogen bonding interactions.

Antioxidant Activities of GLP-1 and GLP-2 In Vitro
Nowadays, many antioxidant methods are widely used to screen antioxidant compounds, but various analytical methods have different mechanisms and suitability. Therefore, a single method cannot accurately and quantitatively assess the antioxidant capacity, and two or more methods with different mechanisms of antioxidant action are suggested [49,50]. In this study, ABTS, hydroxyl radical, superoxide anion radical, FRAP, and ORAC assays were carried out to compare the antioxidant activities of GLP-1 and GLP-2.
As shown in Figure 4, both GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited obvious ABTS, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion radical scavenging activities in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, the IC50 values of GLP-1 for ABTS, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion radical were 0.56 mg/mL, 1.32 mg/mL, and 0.76 mg/mL, respectively, which were lower than those of GLP-2 (1.18 mg/mL, 2.78 mg/mL, and 1.34 mg/mL). However, the radical scavenging abilities of Vc were relatively higher than those of GLP-1 and GLP-2. For FRAP and ORAC assays ( Figure 4D,E), the TEAC values of GLP-1 were 6.85 μmol/g and 84.8 μmol/g, respectively, which were 2.77 and 1.61 times larger than those of GLP-2 (3.59 μmol/g and 52.6 μmol/g, respectively). The TEAC values of GLP-1 and GLP-2 from the FRAP assay were lower than those from the ORAC assay. On one hand, this was due to the different reaction mechanisms of these two methods. On the other hand, both GLP-1 and GLP-2 exhibited weak reducing power, which was consistent with the results from a previous study [51]. The results of five antioxidant methods consistently indicated that GLP-1 had better antioxidant activity than GLP-2. Although many studies have demonstrated that polysaccharides possess antioxidant activities, the underlying mechanism is still not fully understood. It has been reported that the molecular weight and uronic acid contents of polysaccharides are two important parameters related to antioxidant abilities [52,53]. The presence of uronic acid groups in the polysaccharides can activate the hydrogen atom of the anomeric carbon [52]. In several studies, polysaccharides with higher uronic acid contents were found to generally have stronger antioxidant properties [34,54]. Our results showed that GLP-1 exhibited better antioxidant capacity despite the fact that the uronic acid content in GLP-1 was lower than that in GLP-2. This may be correlated to the different molecular weights between GLP-1 and GLP-2. In some previous studies, polysaccharides with relatively larger molecular weights showed better antioxidant efficiency [55,56]. Nevertheless, Cai et al. [53] found that a low-Mw polysaccharide from Sophorae tonkinensis Radix was more effective in free-radical scavenging and Fe 2+ chelating. Liu et al. [51] reported that a low-Mw polysaccharide (5.2 kDa) from G. lucidum displayed better antioxidant activity than a high-Mw polysaccharide (15.4 kDa), which is consistent with our result. Therefore, the stronger antioxidant properties of GLP-1 could be partly due to its relatively lower molecular weight.

Protective Effects of GLP-1 on tBHP-Induced Oxidative Damage in NIH3T3 Cells
To confirm an appropriate concentration in the cell model, NIH3T3 cells were treated with different tBHP concentrations. As shown in Figure 5A, after treatment with 100 µM of tBHP, the viability of NIH3T3 cells significantly decreased to 54.4%. Therefore, tBHP at a concentration of 100 µM was used to induce oxidative damage in the subsequent experiments.
atively larger molecular weights showed better antioxidant efficiency [55,56]. Nevertheless, Cai et al. [53] found that a low-Mw polysaccharide from Sophorae tonkinensis Radix was more effective in free-radical scavenging and Fe 2+ chelating. Liu et al. [51] reported that a low-Mw polysaccharide (5.2 kDa) from G. lucidum displayed better antioxidant activity than a high-Mw polysaccharide (15.4 kDa), which is consistent with our result. Therefore, the stronger antioxidant properties of GLP-1 could be partly due to its relatively lower molecular weight.

Protective Effects of GLP-1 on tBHP-Induced Oxidative Damage in NIH3T3 Cells
To confirm an appropriate concentration in the cell model, NIH3T3 cells were treated with different tBHP concentrations. As shown in Figure 5A, after treatment with 100 μM of tBHP, the viability of NIH3T3 cells significantly decreased to 54.4%. Therefore, tBHP at a concentration of 100 μM was used to induce oxidative damage in the subsequent experiments.
As shown in Figure 5B, compared with the model group, treatment with various GLP-1 concentrations (0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, and 2 mg/mL) increased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. The viability of NIH3T3 cells treated with 2 mg/mL of GLP-1 was significantly increased to 90.5%. As a stable cytoplasmic enzyme, LDH was a vital marker to evaluate cellular injury [34]. As illustrated in Figure 5C, LDH leakage markedly increased after the treatment with 100 μM tBHP. However, GLP-1 inhibited the LDH release in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, 2 mg/mL of GLP-1 reduced the LDH levels to a normal level. The protective effects of GLP-1 at 2 mg/mL were comparable to those of Trolox (80 μM). These results indicated that GLP-1 could prevent tBHP-induced oxidative damage in NIH3T3 cells.  As shown in Figure 5B, compared with the model group, treatment with various GLP-1 concentrations (0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, and 2 mg/mL) increased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. The viability of NIH3T3 cells treated with 2 mg/mL of GLP-1 was significantly increased to 90.5%. As a stable cytoplasmic enzyme, LDH was a vital marker to evaluate cellular injury [34]. As illustrated in Figure 5C, LDH leakage markedly increased after the treatment with 100 µM tBHP. However, GLP-1 inhibited the LDH release in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, 2 mg/mL of GLP-1 reduced the LDH levels to a normal level. The protective effects of GLP-1 at 2 mg/mL were comparable to those of Trolox (80 µM). These results indicated that GLP-1 could prevent tBHP-induced oxidative damage in NIH3T3 cells.
Excessive intracellular ROS can cause oxidative stress through the oxidation of biomolecules in cells and tissues [57]. Antioxidants can protect cells from oxidative damage by reducing the ROS levels [58]. To explore the underlying mechanisms by which GLP-1 protected against tBHP, the effect of GLP-1 on intracellular ROS levels was investigated. As presented in Figure 6, compared with the blank control group, a significant increase in ROS production was observed in NIH3T3 cells after tBHP treatment for 6 h. However, the GLP-1-treated groups significantly reduced ROS generation compared with the tBHP-induced group. These results suggested that GLP-1 could protect NIH3T3 cells from tBHP-induced oxidative damage by inhibiting intracellular ROS production.
MDA accumulation in a dose-dependent manner, and the inhibitory effect of 2 mg/ GLP-1 was comparable to that of 80 μM Trolox. Glutathione, a nonenzymatic anti dant in the cells, plays a crucial role in the antioxidant defense system. A too-high le of GSSG may damage many enzymes; thus, the GSH/GSSG ratio is a good index of dative damage in cells [2]. As can be seen in Figure 7B, the GSH/GSSG ratio marke reduced in NIH3T3 cells induced by tBHP. However, GLP-1 treatment significantly hibited the decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the tBHP-treated group.  Overproduced ROS can react with the double bonds of polyunsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes and consequently generate lipid hydroperoxides. MDA, a marker of lipid peroxidation, has been reported to accumulate in various diseases related to free radical damage [59]. As shown in Figure 7A, tBHP-treated NIH3T3 cells increased the MDA level by a factor of 2.5. The polysaccharide GLP-1 significantly suppressed the MDA accumulation in a dose-dependent manner, and the inhibitory effect of 2 mg/mL GLP-1 was comparable to that of 80 µM Trolox. Glutathione, a nonenzymatic antioxidant in the cells, plays a crucial role in the antioxidant defense system. A too-high level of GSSG may damage many enzymes; thus, the GSH/GSSG ratio is a good index of oxidative damage in cells [2]. As can be seen in Figure 7B, the GSH/GSSG ratio markedly reduced in NIH3T3 cells induced by tBHP. However, GLP-1 treatment significantly inhibited the decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio of the tBHP-treated group. The antioxidant enzyme system plays an important role in the protection against oxidative stress. Catalase and GSH-Px are included in this system, and their activities have been widely used as important antioxidant biomarkers [7,60]. Catalase converts H 2 O 2 to H 2 O, and GSH-Px participates in catalyzing the reaction of hydroperoxides, which requires GSH as the electron donor. Therefore, their activities are crucial for maintaining the steady-state concentration of H 2 O 2 and the control level of lipid hydroperoxides [61,62]. As shown in Figure 7C,D, compared with the blank control, NIH3T3 cells exposed to tBHP featured a significant decrease in CAT and GSH-Px activities. Nevertheless, GLP-1 treatment significantly elevated CAT and GSH-Px activities in comparison to the tBHPtreated group. Additionally, GLP-1 at higher concentrations (1 mg/mL and 2 mg/mL) markedly enhanced CAT and GSH-Px activities compared with those of the untreated cells. These findings indicated that GLP-1 might protect NIH3T3 cells against oxidative damage through the enzymatic mechanism. Figure 6. Effect of GLP-1 on intracellular ROS level: blank control group (A); cells treated with 100 μM tBHP (B); 100 μM tBHP + 0.5 mg/mL GLP-1 (C); 100 μM tBHP + 1 mg/mL GLP-1 (D); 100 μM tBHP + 2 mg/mL GLP-1 (E); 100 μM tBHP + 80 μM Trolox (F). Fluorescence intensity analysis (G). Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Values with different letters (a-d) denote the significant differences (p < 0.05).
The assignations of residue signals in 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra were further analyzed by the 1 H-1 H COSY and HSQC spectra. The residue A, namely →4)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, was taken as an example in this section. The cross-peaks 5.32/3.55 and 3.55/3.88 ppm were detected in the 1 H-1 H COSY spectrum (Figure 9). Given that the signal at 5.32 ppm corresponded to the H-1 of residue A, 3.55 and 3.88 ppm were attributed to the H-2 and H-3 of residue A, respectively. Similarly, the signals at 3.58, 3.76, and 3.77 ppm were assigned to the H-4, H-5, and H-6 of residue A. From the HSQC spectrum ( Figure 10), the strong cross-peak H/C (5.32/100.66 ppm) revealed close connectivity between H-1 and C-1. The carbon peaks of C-2 (72.53 ppm), C-3 (74.25 ppm), C-4 (77.69 ppm), C-5 (72.22 ppm), and C-6 (61.43 ppm) were also found in the HSQC spectrum. Based on the above-mentioned analogy and the literature data, the C/H chemical shifts of all residues were confirmed and are presented in Table 3 [24,34,[64][65][66][67].
The linkage sequence and sites of glucosyl moieties were determined by the HMBC spectrum ( Figure 11). Residue C C-1 was related to residue B H-4 and C H-3, and residue B C-4 was related to residue B H-1. Hence, the following connectivity was established: →3)-β-    Figure S2). The signals at 16.57/1.15 ppm might be due to the methyl of Rha residues (K). The assignations of residue signals in 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra were further analyzed by the 1 H-1 H COSY and HSQC spectra. The residue A, namely →4)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, was taken as an example in this section. The cross-peaks 5.32/3.55 and 3.55/3.88 ppm were detected in the 1 H-1 H COSY spectrum (Figure 9). Given that the signal at 5.32 ppm corresponded to the H-1 of residue A, 3.55 and 3.88 ppm were attributed to the H-2 and        presence of →4,6)-α-D-Glcp-(1→4,6)-β-D-Galp-(1→. Based on the monosaccharide composition analysis, methylation analysis, and NMR spectroscopy, the probable preliminary structure of GLP-1 is shown in Figure 12.

Conclusions
In this study, two low-molecular-weight polysaccharides, GLP-1 and GLP-2, were isolated and purified from G. leucocontextum, and their physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities were compared. The results showed that GLP-1 and GLP-2 had similar monosaccharide compositions, chain conformation, crystal structure, and molecular surface morphology, with Mw of 6.31 and 14.07 kDa, respectively. The characteristic

Conclusions
In this study, two low-molecular-weight polysaccharides, GLP-1 and GLP-2, were isolated and purified from G. leucocontextum, and their physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities were compared. The results showed that GLP-1 and GLP-2 had similar monosaccharide compositions, chain conformation, crystal structure, and molecular surface morphology, with Mw of 6.31 and 14.07 kDa, respectively. The characteristic

Conclusions
In this study, two low-molecular-weight polysaccharides, GLP-1 and GLP-2, were isolated and purified from G. leucocontextum, and their physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities were compared. The results showed that GLP-1 and GLP-2 had similar monosaccharide compositions, chain conformation, crystal structure, and molecular surface morphology, with Mw of 6.31 and 14.07 kDa, respectively. The characteristic absorption peaks of polysaccharides were observed in the FT-IR spectra of GLP-1 and GLP-2. Moreover, GLP-1, with a lower Mw than GLP-2, possessed better antioxidant capacities than GLP-2 in five different assays in vitro. Methylation analysis and NMR spectroscopy revealed that GLP-1 contained 14 kinds of linkage types. In addition, GLP-1 could inhibit ROS production and MDA accumulation in NIH3T3 cells induced by tBHP by elevating the GSH/GSSG ratio and CAT and GSH-Px activities. Our results elucidated the elaborate structure of GLP-1 and demonstrated its in vitro antioxidant activities through chemical methods and a cellular model. However, further investigation of the antioxidant property of GLP-1 in vivo is needed.