NO-CH 4-SCR Over Core-Shell MnH-Zeolite Composites

Selective catalytic reduction of NO with methane (NO-CH4-SCR) in the presence of excess oxygen was investigated over the synthesized MnH-ZZs-n zeolite composite catalysts with FAU (as core) and BEA (as shell) topologies. XRD, SEM, and NH3-TPD technologies were employed to characterize the catalysts. It is found that the topological structure of the zeolite affected the catalytic properties and H2O/SO2 tolerances considerably. MnH-ZZs-n catalysts exhibited much higher NO-CH4-SCR activity than the physical mixture catalysts with comparable relative mass content of Y and Beta zeolites, particularly the ratio of Y and Beta at the range of 0.2–0.5 than the MnH-Beta catalysts with single topology. NH3-TPD results showed that one new type of strong acidic sites formed in H-ZZs-n and remained in MnH-ZZs-n resulted from the interaction between the Lewis and Brönsted acid sites under a particular environment. The special zeolite-zeolite structure with ion-exchanged Mn ions in the core-shell zeolite composite catalysts contributed to the novel NO-CH4-SCR properties.


Introduction
The combustion of coal, gasoline, and natural gas meets mankind's demands for energy.However, the emission of flue gas has caused severe environmental pollution, particularly NOx (among them 90% is NO), which can not only cause acid rain and photochemical smog, but also result in the greenhouse effect.The catalytic removal of NOx is one of the most important ways to decrease the impact of NOx on the environment [1].Indeed, selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH 3 (NH 3 -SCR) has been put into commercial operation.However, well-known disadvantages such as storage of ammonia, costly equipment, the danger of ammonia leakage, and the possible formation of ammonium sulfates due to the reaction of SO 2 (SO 3 ), NH 3 and H 2 O greatly restrict the widely application of this technology [2].Thus, many researchers have made efforts to find other new reductants to substitute for NH 3 .It has been found that hydrocarbons such as C 3 H 6 and C 3 H 8 exhibit high activity for NO reduction over many catalysts [3].In particular, Armor's group reported that NO can be selectively reduced by CH 4 over Co ion-exchange ZSM-5 and ferrierite in the presence of excess oxygen [4].This is of considerable interest because there are plenty of CH 4 and natural gas vehicles increasing worldwide, and CH 4 itself is a greenhouse gas with a stronger greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide.A thorough review on the state of research has been reported [5,6] in which three types of catalysts, i.e., metal oxides, loaded metal, and zeolite loaded metal, are active for CH 4 -SCR.Among them, metal-zeolite catalysts have received the greatest attention because zeolite not only has a large surface, but also acid function and high hydrothermal stability.Zeolite-based catalysts containing different metals have been reported as active materials for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with methane (CH 4 -SCR) [4].CO [5,7,8], Mn [6,[9][10][11], Pd [12] etc. incorporated into ZSM-5 have been confirmed to be active sites for CH 4 -SCR.On the other hand, the zeolite structure has considerably affected the CH 4 -SCR reactivity.For example, ZSM-5, ferrierite, mordenite [13], and Beta [14] loaded metals exhibited high CH 4 -SCR activity, while zeolite Y loaded metals are poor for the reaction.So far, almost all research has been focused only on the zeolites with single topology.In fact, zeolitic composites with different porous structure have shown the special synergic effects in catalysis [15][16][17].CH 4 -SCR reactivity of the catalysts based on two different zeolite structures (MOR and BEA) containing Pd and Ce was reported [18].Compared to each individual-zeolite catalyst, the catalytic performance of the zeolite composite was significantly improved because of the synergic effects of the zeolites.In our group, a new type of zeolite composite ZZs-n with FAU and BEA topology was synthesized.CoH-Beta/Y exhibited not only high CH 4 -SCR activity but also better SO 2 and H 2 O tolerance than CoH-Beta.Mn-zeolite is promising for CH 4 -SCR because of relatively higher tolerance to water vapor [19] than Co-zeolite with single topology.Thus, it is of considerable interest to investigate NO-CH 4 -SCR over MnH-ZZs-n.It is clearly evident from the transient studies of the NO and NO + O 2 reaction that the adsorbed NO molecules must be dissociated over the partially reduced manganese sites [20].The Mn/TiO 2 catalyst showed good phase stability during the NOx decomposition reaction at a different temperature and exhibited a good resistance to 10 vol% H 2 O and 100 ppm of SO 2 [21].In comparison, Mn/TNT showed an impressive deNOx potential compared to other active components in titania nanotubes [22].
In this contribution, NO-CH 4 -SCR over MnH-ZZs-n is investigated.Effects of H 2 O and SO 2 on the catalytic performance of MnH-ZZs-n are reported.

Catalyst Preparation
Zeolite composite was synthesized in the laboratory by two-step hydrothermal crystallization with sodium silicate aqueous solution (29.12% SiO 2 , [OH − ] = 2.75 mol/L), colloidal silica ([SiO 2 ] = 6.02 mol/L), sodium aluminate aqueous solution (31.65% Al 2 O 3 , [OH − ] = 9.87 mol/L), sodium hydroxide, tetraethylammonium bromide, ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution (25% NH 3 ), and distilled water.The synthesis procedure was as follows: Na-Y zeolite was first synthesized in terms of the composition of (2.0-2.5)Na 2 O:(4.0-6.0)SiO 2 :Al 2 O 3 :420H 2 O.The synthesis gel was autoclaved at 373 K for 24 h.Then, it was cooled down to room temperature and added to the synthesis gel of zeolite Beta under strong stirring conditions.The synthesis gel of zeolite Beta was prepared with tetraethylammonium bromide, NH 3 •H 2 O, colloidal silica, and sodium aluminate aqueous solution by following the procedures established by Eapen and co-workers [23].The pH value of the above mixture was adjusted to 12.0-12.5 with concentrated H 2 SO 4 acid.Finally, the resultant uniform mixture containing zeolite Y was crystallized again at 413 K for 120-160 h in a stainless-steel autoclave.The products were filtered, washed, and dried at 393 K for 8 h to obtain core-shell zeolite composite, denoted as ZZs-n (n is the ratio of zeolite Y and zeolite Beta in the composites).Some samples were further calcined at 823 K for 6 h in an air flow with a heating rate of 1 K/min.Na-Y zeolite was synthesized according to the same method, whereas Na-Beta zeolite with a Si/Al ratio of 15 was synthesized in the laboratory.
The calcined samples were first ion-exchanged with 0.1 mol•L −1 of aqueous solution of NH 4 NO 3 at a liquid to solid ratio of 20 mL/g.The solid products were then thoroughly washed with distilled water, dried at 383 K overnight, and finally calcined at 823 K to get H-zeolites.H-zeolites were subsequently ion-exchanged with aqueous solution of Mn(CH 3 COO) 2 .The obtained solid samples were washed with distilled water, dried at 383 K overnight, and calcined in air flow at a ramp of 2 K•min −1 from room temperature (RT) to 823 K and kept for three hours to obtain MnH-ZZs-n catalysts.MnNa-ZZs-n catalysts were acquired using the same process.The ion-exchange conditions and selected properties of the catalysts were listed in Table 1.With a decrease of zeolite Y in the zeolite composites, the special surface areas of the composites decreased because of a larger surface area of zeolite Y than zeolite Beta.

Catalyst Characterization
The crystalline of the catalysts was determined by using X-ray diffraction measurement (XRD; Rigaku D/max_2500V) with Cu-K α radiation.The crystallinity the zeolite composite catalysts were estimated by comparing the areas of the selected diffraction peaks of (111), ( 220), (311), ( 511) and (440) for zeolite Y, and those of (101) and (302) for zeolite Beta based on the corresponding reference samples, respectively.The credibility of this method has been proven by the linear increase in the intensity of the diffraction peaks of these two types of zeolites with increasing zeolite phase contents in the mixture of amorphous silica and zeolite.In this way, n values in the Mn-ZZs-n samples were estimated as 1.0, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2, respectively.Thus, the mechanical mixtures (designated as ZZm-n) with the corresponding amounts of MnH-Y and MnH-Beta phases were prepared for comparison.Specific surface areas of the catalysts were measured by physical adsorption/desportion of N 2 at 77 K isotherms on NOVA 1200e.The elemental composition of the catalysts was determined by atom absorption spectrum (AAS).The morphology of the catalyst was observed by using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM S-5200).
Temperature programmed desorption of ammonia (NH 3 -TPD) tests were performed on a chemical BET surface apparatus (CHEMBET 3000) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).An 0.15 g sample was loaded into a U model quartz tube, treated at 923 K in ultra-highly purified (UHP, 99.999%)He flow for 1 h, and then cooled down to 373 K.The sample was saturated with 10% NH 3 /He at 373 K and purged with UHP He flow at 373 K for 30 min.The NH 3 -TPD test was conducted by heating the sample in 80 mL•min −1 UHP He flowing at a rate of 10 K•min −1 .During the NH 3 -TPD test course, a water trap was equipped between the sample and the TCD to avoid interference by water.

Catalytic Activity Measurements
The NO-CH 4 -SCR test was carried out in a fixed-bed micro-reactor system consisting of a 6 mm I.D. quartz reactor tube, a temperature controller with K mode thermoelectric couple, four mass flowing controllers, and a gas chromatograph (GC 9A) equipped with a TCD.The catalyst samples were palletized, crushed, and sieved to 40~60 mesh for the catalytic tests.The 0.3 g particular catalyst was packed into the micro-reactor and pretreated in He flow (40 mL•min −1 ) at a ramp of 1 K•min −1 from room temperature to 673 K and kept for 1 h.Then, the sample was cooled down to 473~573 K and the reaction mixture containing 2180 ppm NO, 2050 ppm CH 4 , 2% O 2 , balanced by He flowed through the catalyst at 75 mL•min −1 (GHSV 7500 h −1 by assuming the bulk density of the catalyst 0.5 g•cm −3 ).
Under oxidizing conditions, sulfur compounds end up mainly as SO 2 ; therefore, SO 2 was chosen as model sulfur compound.For reactions involving SO 2 , a reactor with two-inlets was used to minimize contamination of the system by SO 2 exposure.SO 2 /He (294 ppm) was added to the reactor via a separate inlet.The final concentration in the feed was 78 ppm.Water vapor was added to the feed using an H 2 O saturator comprised of a sealed glass bubbler with a medium-pore frit immersed in distilled water.Helium (20 mL•min −1 ) flowed through the bubbler, carrying H 2 O vapor to the feed.The bubbler was placed in a constant temperature tank.Different amounts of H 2 O vapor could be added to the feed by adjusting temperature of the bubbler.The gas line containing H 2 O vapor was heated traced to a temperature higher than the saturation temperature.An ice-cooled H 2 O condenser was incorporated downstream of the reactor before effluent gas entering gas chromatograph.
The compositions of the effluent gas were analyzed by using the GC with molecular sieve-5A column for N 2 , O 2 , CH 4 , CO, and Porapak Q column for CO 2 and N 2 O. Negligible N 2 O was formed in the effluent gas.NO and NO 2 were quantified by using a flue gas analyzer (Kane May, UK).The catalytic activity was evaluated based on the NO to N 2 conversion C NO : ] o represent the concentration of CH 4 in inlet and outlet, respectively.The above experiments were repeated three times, and the data were the average of these three runs.Dear Shao, Thanks for your Email.I would like to explain the notes:

XRD Patterns of the Catalysts
[M1] a : T, C, L/S, t and N represent ion-exchange temperature, concentration of solution, liquid to solid ratio, ion-exchange time and times.
[M2]: it is not necessary to be bold.
However, I would like to suggest to improve your submission system based on the following reasons, 1.The Notes cannot be found and/or opened in the Proof documents.FE-SEM measurements (Figure 2) show that MnH-Y prepared by the same method as that for synthesizing the ZZs-n composite is composed of typical octahedral crystals, MnH-Beta has an irregular Appl.Sci.2019, 9, 1773 5 of 12 spherical shape.As expected, the mechanical zeolite mixture consists of two types of crystals belonging to MnH-Y and MnH-Beta without uniform distribution, and they are closed contact with each other.For the MnH-ZZs-0.5composite sample, due to an epitaxial growth of tetragonal BEA structure around cubic FAU structure, the special octahedral crystals of zeolite Y are not easily observed because of the formation of a core-shell structure, resulting in a morphology somewhat similar to MnH-Beta.But the composite catalyst is markedly different from MnH-Y (Figure 2A) and MnH-ZZm-0.5 (Figure 2C).

NH3-TPD Results.
NH3-TPD results H-zeolites and MnH-zeolite catalysts are shown in Figure 3.The TPD curves of the H-Y show two partially overlapping NH3 desorption peaks at low temperature (around at 498 K and 538 K), which are attributed to desorption of NH3 from weak acidic sites and an overlapping peak at high temperature (around at 633 K), which is attributed to the desorption of NH3 from protonic H + sites.After ion-exchange with Mn cations, total amount of weak acidic sites in the catalyst increased because Mn 2+ cations are a Lewis acid, while the amount of protonic H + sites decreased because they are displaced by Mn 2+ cations.The NH3-TPD profile of H-Beta shows two well-resolved peaks at about 513 K and 673 K. Similar NH3-TPD curves are reported for the H-Beta samples with comparable Si/Al ratio [24].The amount of protonic H + sites in the MnH-Beta also decreased because of ion exchange.NH3-TPD results of the physical mixture of H-Y+H-Beta and ZZm-0.3 are very close to the algebra sum of those of the single phase (not shown).
Worthily, the desorption peak of NH3 in H-ZZs-0.3 from 843 K shifts to 873 K in MnH-ZZs-0.3,showed an increase in the acid strength, although the amount of the strong acidic sites decreased considerably because of the exchange of part of H + cations with Mn 2+ ions (Figures 3A(c),B(c)).The formation of highly strong acid sites in the zeolite composite originated from the epitaxial growth of zeolite Beta on the zeolite Y because of an interface structure different from both zeolite Beta and Y structures.The results are supported by framework IR spectroscopies of the physical mixture of the two zeolites and the Y@Beta zeolite composite [25].However, there is still no effective technique to ascertain the ion sites in the high silicon zeolite even with single topology.But then, the Brönsted acidity of a zeolite is also influenced by the presence of Lewis acidity.This synergy between Lewis and Brönsted acid sites resulted in an increase of the acid strength, in which the combination of Brönsted and Lewis acids can render superacids with remarkably enhanced strength [26].In the former research on the CoH-Y/Beta catalysts, we concluded that CO ion exchange sites existed in H-Y/Beta zeolite composite in an indirect method.Mn 2+ cations in the zeolite composite occupied the similar sites to Co 2+ in the catalysts [25].

NH 3 -TPD Results
NH 3 -TPD results H-zeolites and MnH-zeolite catalysts are shown in Figure 3.The TPD curves of the H-Y show two partially overlapping NH 3 desorption peaks at low temperature (around at 498 K and 538 K), which are attributed to desorption of NH 3 from weak acidic sites and an overlapping peak at high temperature (around at 633 K), which is attributed to the desorption of NH 3 from protonic H + sites.After ion-exchange with Mn cations, total amount of weak acidic sites in the catalyst increased because Mn 2+ cations are a Lewis acid, while the amount of protonic H + sites decreased because they are displaced by Mn 2+ cations.The NH 3 -TPD profile of H-Beta shows two well-resolved peaks at about 513 K and 673 K. Similar NH 3 -TPD curves are reported for the H-Beta samples with comparable Si/Al ratio [24].The amount of protonic H + sites in the MnH-Beta also decreased because of ion exchange.NH 3 -TPD results of the physical mixture of H-Y+H-Beta and ZZm-0.3 are very close to the algebra sum of those of the single phase (not shown).
Worthily, the desorption peak of NH 3 in H-ZZs-0.3 from 843 K shifts to 873 K in MnH-ZZs-0.3,showed an increase in the acid strength, although the amount of the strong acidic sites decreased considerably because of the exchange of part of H + cations with Mn 2+ ions (Figure 3A(c),B(c)).The formation of highly strong acid sites in the zeolite composite originated from the epitaxial growth of zeolite Beta on the zeolite Y because of an interface structure different from both zeolite Beta and Y structures.The results are supported by framework IR spectroscopies of the physical mixture of the two zeolites and the Y@Beta zeolite composite [25].However, there is still no effective technique to ascertain the ion sites in the high silicon zeolite even with single topology.But then, the Brönsted acidity of a zeolite is also influenced by the presence of Lewis acidity.This synergy between Lewis and Brönsted acid sites resulted in an increase of the acid strength, in which the combination of Brönsted and Lewis acids can render superacids with remarkably enhanced strength [26].In the former research on the CoH-Y/Beta catalysts, we concluded that CO ion exchange sites existed in H-Y/Beta zeolite composite in an indirect method.Mn 2+ cations in the zeolite composite occupied the similar sites to Co 2+ in the catalysts [25].

Catalytic Activity Studies
NO-CH4-SCR reaction results over the catalysts are summarized in Table 2.In the process, NO is converted to N2 and CH4 is converted to CO2 completely.MnH-Y exhibits low NO-CH4-SCR activity in the entire test temperature range, which is similar to that over CoH-Y.The maximal NO to N2 conversion was 61.1% at 773 K over MnH-Beta.This is probably due to the different cation coordination and the different acidity of these two types of zeolites [8,27,28].The cation coordination is influenced by the ligand, crystal field and topological structure of zeolites [28], whereas the acidity depends on the zeolite structure.These two factors collaborate to promote NO conversion to N2 in NO-CH4-SCR [27,28].As expected, the NO to N2 conversion over ZZm-n decreases with the content of MnH-Beta in the zeolite mixtures, and is lower than that over MnH-Beta in the entire test temperature range.
NO to N2 conversions over MnH-ZZs-n are higher than that over ZZm-n in the entire test temperature range, although the relative content of BEA and FAU phase is comparable.Moreover, the methane conversion over MnH-ZZs-n was suppressed because of the different types of Mn 2+ cations and the interaction with acid sites in zeolites.The maximal NO to N2 conversion over MnH-ZZs-n catalysts has a maximum with the change of zeolite Y phase in the composites.The maximal NO to N2 conversions are 74.6%,77.3%, 65.8%, and 46.8%, respectively, over MnH-ZZs-n (n = 1.0, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2).
If there is no synergic effect between two zeolites in the composites, the NO to N2 conversions over MnH-ZZs-n catalysts, such as at T = 773 K or 823 K, should be closed to those over the physical mixtures MnH-ZZm-n.Practically, a significant difference is indicated, particularly in the case of the relative contents of zeolite Y in the composites between 0.2 and 0.5.In all cases, a positive synergic effect for NO to N2 conversion is observed over the core-shell composite catalysts [18].

Catalytic Activity Studies
NO-CH 4 -SCR reaction results over the catalysts are summarized in Table 2.In the process, NO is converted to N 2 and CH 4 is converted to CO 2 completely.MnH-Y exhibits low NO-CH 4 -SCR activity in the entire test temperature range, which is similar to that over CoH-Y.The maximal NO to N 2 conversion was 61.1% at 773 K over MnH-Beta.This is probably due to the different cation coordination and the different acidity of these two types of zeolites [8,27,28].The cation coordination is influenced by the ligand, crystal field and topological structure of zeolites [28], whereas the acidity depends on the zeolite structure.These two factors collaborate to promote NO conversion to N 2 in NO-CH 4 -SCR [27,28].As expected, the NO to N 2 conversion over ZZm-n decreases with the content of MnH-Beta in the zeolite mixtures, and is lower than that over MnH-Beta in the entire test temperature range.
NO to N 2 conversions over MnH-ZZs-n are higher than that over ZZm-n in the entire test temperature range, although the relative content of BEA and FAU phase is comparable.Moreover, the methane conversion over MnH-ZZs-n was suppressed because of the different types of Mn 2+ cations and the interaction with acid sites in zeolites.The maximal NO to N 2 conversion over MnH-ZZs-n catalysts has a maximum with the change of zeolite Y phase in the composites.The maximal NO to N 2 conversions are 74.6%,77.3%, 65.8%, and 46.8%, respectively, over MnH-ZZs-n (n = 1.0, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2).
If there is no synergic effect between two zeolites in the composites, the NO to N 2 conversions over MnH-ZZs-n catalysts, such as at T = 773 K or 823 K, should be closed to those over the physical mixtures MnH-ZZm-n.Practically, a significant difference is indicated, particularly in the case of the relative contents of zeolite Y in the composites between 0.2 and 0.5.In all cases, a positive synergic effect for NO to N 2 conversion is observed over the core-shell composite catalysts [18].
To understand the effect of protonic sites in the catalysts, activity tests were performed over MnNa-ZZs-0.5 and MnH-ZZs-0.5 prepared with the same parent Na-ZZs-0.5zeolite composite.The results in Table 2 show that NO to N 2 conversions over MnNa-ZZs-0.5 and MnH-ZZs-0.5 catalysts are comparable at a temperature below 723 K. Increasing the reaction temperature, NO-CH 4 -SCR activity over MnH-ZZs-0.5 is much higher than that over MnNa-ZZs-0.5.The maximal NO to N 2 conversions are 77.3% at 823 K over MnH-ZZs-n and 55.5% over MnNa-ZZs-n at the same temperature.It is well known that the acidic OHs in zeolites are active in adsorbing and perturbing hydrocarbon molecules, and nitrogen oxides as well [29], the protonic sites promoted NO-CH 4 -SCR.Obviously the synergistic effect between the metal and protonic sites of zeolite is reflected only at a higher temperature in the reaction system.Table 3 showed the effect of Mn content in the catalysts on the NO-CH 4 -SCR activity.The NO-CH 4 -SCR activity increases considerably over the catalysts incorporated with Mn loadings.However, MnNa-ZZs-n and MnH-ZZs-n exhibited similar activity at a temperature lower than 673 K, indicating the ion-exchange Mn in the zeolite composites play a key role in NO-CH 4 -SCR.As mentioned above, the synergic effect of metal ions and protonic sites resulted in much higher NO-CH 4 -SCR activity over MnH-ZZs-n than MnNa-ZZs-n at a high reaction temperature.The transient response analysis and in situ FT-IR studies, by exploring the surface interactions of isotopic labeled reactants, showed that the reaction follows a Mars-van-Krevelen-like mechanism through the formation of nitrosamide and azoxy intermediates [30].The normalized NOx conversions with respect to a different carrier (support) as a function of surface active sites indicating that the promoted or isolated Mn 4+ and Ce 3+ species located over the surface of TiO 2 are responsible for the high deNOx efficiency over Mn-Ce/TiO 2 (Hk) catalyst [31].So far, there still remain questions about the reaction mechanism and the potential intermediate species over the Mn-based catalysts [30].It can be concluded that Mn 2+ cations in the ion-exchanged zeolites are active sites and acid sites of zeolite play a minor role in the CH 4 -SCR of NO to N 2 at low reaction temperature; with increase of the reaction temperature, the synergic effects of metal ions and protonic sites are the key factors for improving the reaction [13].
As a result, the properties of the ZZs zeolite composites are completely different from the physical mixtures of zeolites ZZm in the reaction, the introduction of the protons into zeolites increases the conversion of NO to N 2 , and but decreases the conversion of CH 4 to CO 2 under the same reaction conditions.The introduction of Mn 2+ cations into zeolites greatly increases the conversions of NO to N 2 and CH 4 to CO 2 .The appearance of the strong acid sites partially increases the activity of the catalysts at a low temperature.During the combustion of the fuel, the existence of H 2 O and SO 2 in the exhaust is inevitable.Indeed, the existence of H 2 O and SO 2 greatly suppressed CH 4 -SCR catalytic activity of the Co-zeolite catalysts [5].Mn-ZSM-5 exhibited better H 2 O tolerance than Co-ZSM-5 for CH 4 -SCR [11].Thus, it is of considerable interest to study H 2 O and SO 2 tolerance of the MnH-ZZs-n for CH 4 -SCR.Figure 4 shows the NO-CH 4 -SCR activity over MnH-ZZs-0.5 and MnH-Beta at 773 K in the presence of H 2 O or/and SO 2 .
As shown in Figure 4A, addition of 2.5% (v/v) water vapor, NO to N 2 conversion over MnH-ZZs-0.5 decreases from 75.2% a stable level 51.2% in about 3 h, while the CH 4 conversion decreases from 73.3% to 48.1%.In the same condition, NO to N 2 conversion over MnH-Beta decreases from 61.1% to 36.0%from 30 min to 200 min, and the conversion of CH 4 decreases from 84.2% to 58.9%.As the water is removed, the CH 4 -SCR activity almost recovers to the original extent, which indicated that the deactivation caused by the water is reversible.The decrease in the activity in the presence of water vapor may be due to the competence of H 2 O with NO for interacting with Mn 2+ ions to form hydrated species.The adsorption of H 2 O on the catalysts is physical and/or weak-chemical, and there are no strong chemical bonds formed between H 2 O and active sites on the surface of the catalysts.In other words, the Mn catalysts have a good resistance to H 2 O [21,32].Notably, the introducing of water vapor did not damage the topologic structure of the zeolites to remove the framework Al and decrease Brönsted acid sites even at high temperatures because of the special zeolite-zeolite structure with high hydrothermal ability.
this point, complexing ability of NH3 with metal or metal ions is much stronger than that of SO2, which itself has a strong interaction with Mn 2+ and formed chemical bond in the CH4-SCR reaction system.
In Figure 4C, as 2.5% H2O and 78 ppm SO2 are introduced at the same time, NO to N2 conversion over MnH-ZZs-n decreases from 75.3% to 44.1% and reaches to level off in about 4 h and CH4 conversion from 72.9% to 42.4%.In the same condition, NO to N2 conversion over MnH-Beta decreases from 61.2% to 27.2% and to level off in about 4 h, CH4 conversion from 83.9% to 52.4%.As H2O and SO2 are removed, the CH4-SCR activity recovers only a little, which indicates that the deactivation caused by the co-existence of H2O and SO2 is irreversible because of the presence of SO2 in the reaction system.

Conclusions
MnH-ZZs-n core-shell zeolite composite catalysts used in NO-CH4-SCR showed the higher activity than the physical mixtures MnH-ZZm-n, single phase FAU, or BEA zeolite.One new type of strong acidic site existed in H-ZZs-n and changed the NO-CH4-SCR reactivity of MnH-MMs-n.Mn 2+ cations, key active centres for NO-CH4-SCR at low temperature, and protonic acid sites increased the conversion of NO at a high temperature.The special structure properties of zeolite composite resulted in the high reaction activity of MnH-ZZs-n in NO-CH4-SCR.The strong H2O tolerance of the catalyst in NO-CH4-SCR resulted from the new topology structure of zeolite composite and weak SO2 tolerance from the interaction with Mn cations.In Figure 4B, in the dry condition, addition of 78 ppm SO 2 made NO conversion to N 2 over MnH-ZZs-0.5 decreases from 75.2% to a stable level 46.4% in about 4 h and CH 4 conversion drops from 73.2% to 41.4%.In the same condition, NO to N 2 conversion changes from 61.3% to a stable level 31.2% and CH 4 conversion alters from 84.4% to 55.2%.As SO 2 is removed, the CH 4 -SCR activity is only partially recovered, indicating that deactivation caused by SO 2 is irreversible.However, for the selective reduction of NOx to N 2 with NH 3 in the presence of an excess of oxygen, sulfur dioxide with a broad temperature window indicated without sacrificing too much of the efficiency [30], on this point, complexing ability of NH 3 with metal or metal ions is much stronger than that of SO 2 , which itself has a strong interaction with Mn 2+ and formed chemical bond in the CH 4 -SCR reaction system.
In Figure 4C, as 2.5% H 2 O and 78 ppm SO 2 are introduced at the same time, NO to N 2 conversion over MnH-ZZs-n decreases from 75.3% to 44.1% and reaches to level off in about 4 h and CH 4 conversion from 72.9% to 42.4%.In the same condition, NO to N 2 conversion over MnH-Beta decreases from 61.2% to 27.2% and to level off in about 4 h, CH 4 conversion from 83.9% to 52.4%.As H 2 O and SO 2 are removed, the CH 4 -SCR activity recovers only a little, which indicates that the deactivation caused by the co-existence of H 2 O and SO 2 is irreversible because of the presence of SO 2 in the reaction system.

Conclusions
MnH-ZZs-n core-shell zeolite composite catalysts used in NO-CH 4 -SCR showed the higher activity than the physical mixtures MnH-ZZm-n, single phase FAU, or BEA zeolite.One new type of strong acidic site existed in H-ZZs-n and changed the NO-CH 4 -SCR reactivity of MnH-MMs-n.Mn 2+ cations, key active centres for NO-CH 4 -SCR at low temperature, and protonic acid sites increased the conversion of NO at a high temperature.The special structure properties of zeolite composite resulted in the high reaction activity of MnH-ZZs-n in NO-CH 4 -SCR.The strong H 2 O tolerance of the catalyst in NO-CH 4 -SCR resulted from the new topology structure of zeolite composite and weak SO 2 tolerance from the interaction with Mn cations.

Figure 1
Figure1shows the XRD patterns of MnH-ZZs-n (n = 1.0, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2), in which all diffraction peaks are assigned to the characteristics of FAU and BEA topologies, without other undetermined crystalline phases.The crystallinities of the MnH-ZZs-n catalysts are 90~95% of the parent H-ZZs-n samples, respectively, indicating the zeolite lattices were undisturbed after ion exchanging because of the mild ion-exchanged conditions and the low metal loadings.
Appl.Sci.2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 12 irregular spherical shape.As expected, the mechanical zeolite mixture consists of two types of crystals belonging to MnH-Y and MnH-Beta without uniform distribution, and they are closed contact with each other.For the MnH-ZZs-0.5composite sample, due to an epitaxial growth of tetragonal BEA structure around cubic FAU structure, the special octahedral crystals of zeolite Y are not easily observed because of the formation of a core-shell structure, resulting in a morphology somewhat similar to MnH-Beta.But the composite catalyst is markedly different from MnH-Y (Figure2A) and MnH-ZZm-0.5 (Figure2C).

Table 1 .
Preparation catalyst and the selected physical properties.

Table 2 .
CH 4 -SCR activity over MnH-ZZs-n, MnH-Y, MnH-Beta and physical mixture samples in the absence of H 2 O and SO 2.

Table 3 .
Effect of the Mn content in the MnH-ZZs-n on the catalytic activity.