Ferroelectric Materials : A Novel Pathway for Efficient Solar Water Splitting

Over the past few decades, solar water splitting has evolved into one of the most promising techniques for harvesting hydrogen using solar energy. Despite the high potential of this process for hydrogen production, many research groups have encountered significant challenges in the quest to achieve a high solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency. Recently, ferroelectric materials have attracted much attention as promising candidate materials for water splitting. These materials are among the best candidates for achieving water oxidation using solar energy. Moreover, their characteristics are changeable by atom substitute doping or the fabrication of a new complex structure. In this review, we describe solar water splitting technology via the solar-to-hydrogen conversion process. We will examine the challenges associated with this technology whereby ferroelectric materials are exploited to achieve a high solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency.


Introduction
In order to effectively address energy-related problems such as global warming, which is caused by the emissions of air pollutants including carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), there is a growing interest in many kinds of renewable energy (such as solar, wind power, hydroelectric energy, and biomass), and their related applications as an alternative to fossil fuels [1,2].
Among the various alternative energy sources, solar energy is an almost unlimited and clean energy source, given that the Sun has been providing energy in the form of light and heat to the Earth for more than four billion years.Until now, solar energy has been considered as an alternative energy option that could help address several problems of global importance such as an insufficient energy supply, environmental pollution, and fossil fuel resource depletion.Moreover, most regions of our planet including the atmosphere, oceans, and soil receive approximately 3850 zetta joules (ZJ = 10 21 J) of energy every year (~0.539ZJ of energy was consumed worldwide in 2010).Considering only the amount of energy received from the Sun, solar energy is one of best candidates as a substitution for fossil fuels.Even though many researchers have been actively involved in alternative energy research and related technologies have been developed over the years, no more than 1% of the energy produced by the Sun is used by our planet.Therefore, we need to concentrate on the efficiently of solar energy use, whether indirectly or directly [3,4].In particular, for a solar energy carrier, three main points have to be considered.(1) How much cheaper and abundant are chemical reactants?(2) Is the carrier easily stored and transported?(3) In the process, is carbon dioxide generated and emitted?
On the other hand, hydrogen energy and related applications are considered to be excellent alternative renewable energy carriers due to their storability, transportability, and convertibility to energy on demand.Hydrogen gas is a clean, nontoxic, colorless, and eco-friendly source (does not release carbon dioxide) that could be obtained by splitting naturally occurring water into hydrogen and oxygen.Moreover, hydrogen could be used in various energy applications such as hydrogen fuel cells (HFCs), combustible fuel, and synthetic natural materials.It is known that when the gas is used for electricity production such as in the case of hydrogen-powered fuel cells, it has three times the efficiency of electricity generation (~65%) compared to conventional combustion-based power plants (~35%) [5][6][7].
In order for hydrogen to be classified as an environmentally friendly alternative energy source, it should be produced using appropriate processes that use carbon-free environmentally friendly materials instead of fossil fuels.Compared with other methods of hydrogen production (biomass, thermal decomposition of natural gas, water electrolysis, and thermochemical cycles), water-splitting technology has been proposed as the most suitable method for the eco-friendly generation of hydrogen gas from water.It should be noted that solar energy has been used as an energy conversion source of solar thermal and photovoltaics starting from solar light.In particular, water splitting using photovoltaics based on solar energy is ideal for the generation of hydrogen gas from water [8,9].This review will address solar water-splitting technology (such as water splitting in photosynthesis, photoelectrochemical water splitting, and photocatalytic water splitting), including the systems involved and hydrogen production from water and solar energy.Moreover, we will introduce the recent progress in solar water splitting using ferroelectric materials, and summarize how each material plays an important role in achieving efficient solar water splitting.

Overview of Solar Water Splitting
In a solar water-splitting system, hydrogen is produced from the semiconductor-electrolyte interface where sunlight is absorbed in the depletion layer and electron-hole pairs are separated to drive the chemical reaction at the semiconductor-electrolyte interface, Light energy is used to directly dissociate water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen through the following steps: light absorbance, conversion of light to exciton (electron-hole pair), and chemical reaction (separated hydrogen).Water splitting via solar energy is achieved through three kinds of hydrogen production systems [8][9][10][11][12]: (1) particulate photocatalysis (PC) systems, (2) photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems, and (3) photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical (PV-PEC) systems, as shown in Figure 1.In this section, we describe in more detail the mechanism for solar energy conversion to hydrogen fuel, and the as-mentioned three approaches for hydrogen generation are introduced.release carbon dioxide) that could be obtained by splitting naturally occurring water into hydrogen and oxygen.Moreover, hydrogen could be used in various energy applications such as hydrogen fuel cells (HFCs), combustible fuel, and synthetic natural materials.It is known that when the gas is used for electricity production such as in the case of hydrogen-powered fuel cells, it has three times the efficiency of electricity generation (~65%) compared to conventional combustion-based power plants (~35%) [5][6][7].
In order for hydrogen to be classified as an environmentally friendly alternative energy source, it should be produced using appropriate processes that use carbon-free environmentally friendly materials instead of fossil fuels.Compared with other methods of hydrogen production (biomass, thermal decomposition of natural gas, water electrolysis, and thermochemical cycles), water-splitting technology has been proposed as the most suitable method for the eco-friendly generation of hydrogen gas from water.It should be noted that solar energy has been used as an energy conversion source of solar thermal and photovoltaics starting from solar light.In particular, water splitting using photovoltaics based on solar energy is ideal for the generation of hydrogen gas from water [8,9].This review will address solar water-splitting technology (such as water splitting in photosynthesis, photoelectrochemical water splitting, and photocatalytic water splitting), including the systems involved and hydrogen production from water and solar energy.Moreover, we will introduce the recent progress in solar water splitting using ferroelectric materials, and summarize how each material plays an important role in achieving efficient solar water splitting.

Overview of Solar Water Splitting
In a solar water-splitting system, hydrogen is produced from the semiconductor-electrolyte interface where sunlight is absorbed in the depletion layer and electron-hole pairs are separated to drive the chemical reaction at the semiconductor-electrolyte interface, Light energy is used to directly dissociate water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen through the following steps: light absorbance, conversion of light to exciton (electron-hole pair), and chemical reaction (separated hydrogen).Water splitting via solar energy is achieved through three kinds of hydrogen production systems [8][9][10][11][12]: (1) particulate photocatalysis (PC) systems, (2) photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems, and (3) photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical (PV-PEC) systems, as shown in Figure 1.In this section, we describe in more detail the mechanism for solar energy conversion to hydrogen fuel, and the asmentioned three approaches for hydrogen generation are introduced.

Basic Mechanism for Solar Energy to Hydrogen Conversion System
The concept of photocatalytic water splitting (PWS) was introduced by hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting with a rutile TiO2 (anode) as the photocatalyst, and a platinum (cathode).This was first reported by Fujishima and Honda in 1972 [13].Hydrogen could be generated directly from water, and solar light could be generated through the solar energy conversion process.

Basic Mechanism for Solar Energy to Hydrogen Conversion System
The concept of photocatalytic water splitting (PWS) was introduced by hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting with a rutile TiO 2 (anode) as the photocatalyst, and a platinum (cathode).This was first reported by Fujishima and Honda in 1972 [13].Hydrogen could be generated directly from water, and solar light could be generated through the solar energy conversion process.
In PWS systems, photocatalysts play an important role in the conversion of solar energy to hydrogen in response to visible light in the water-splitting system.The hydrogen gas production process involves a photocatalytic reaction such as the direct conversion of solar energy into hydrogen gas in a semiconductor with an energy bandgap that is positioned between their energy band structures.
Step 1: Light (photons) is absorbed near the surface of the semiconducting materials with energies greater than their bandgap energy (e.g., ~1.7 eV).Excited electrons (excitons) and holes are generated inside the semiconducting materials by bandgap excitation.
Step 2: The electrons and holes henceforth referred to as photogenerated electrons and holes are separated in the bandgap and drift to the surface of the semiconducting materials, causing the release of oxygen from water (catalytic water oxidation reaction).
Step 3: The photogenerated electrons combine with H + via the metal electrode (catalytic water reduction reaction).
Figure 2 shows the principle of photocatalytic water-splitting reactions with photoelectrons and holes that are generated by the absorption of light.The photoelectrons and holes reduce and oxidize water on the surface of the semiconductors as the two half-reactions of water splitting via the following reactions [10][11][12].In PWS systems, photocatalysts play an important role in the conversion of solar energy to hydrogen in response to visible light in the water-splitting system.The hydrogen gas production process involves a photocatalytic reaction such as the direct conversion of solar energy into hydrogen gas in a semiconductor with an energy bandgap that is positioned between their energy band structures.
Step 1: Light (photons) is absorbed near the surface of the semiconducting materials with energies greater than their bandgap energy (e.g., ~1.7 eV).Excited electrons (excitons) and holes are generated inside the semiconducting materials by bandgap excitation.
Step 2: The electrons and holes henceforth referred to as photogenerated electrons and holes are separated in the bandgap and drift to the surface of the semiconducting materials, causing the release of oxygen from water (catalytic water oxidation reaction).
Step 3: The photogenerated electrons combine with H + via the metal electrode (catalytic water reduction reaction).
Figure 2 shows the principle of photocatalytic water-splitting reactions with photoelectrons and holes that are generated by the absorption of light.The photoelectrons and holes reduce and oxidize water on the surface of the semiconductors as the two half-reactions of water splitting via the following reactions [10][11][12].The water-splitting reaction is thermodynamically nonspontaneous, and therefore is an uphill reaction.As such, the net Gibbs free energy (ΔG ≈ 237 kJ/mol) needs to be increased.Namely, if a photocatalyst has a bandgap that is larger than the energy required for water splitting (~1.23 eV), then its conduction and valence band edge should contain the oxidation and reduction potential of water [8].

Cathode: Water Reduction of H
It is clear that the O2/H2O redox potential difference is 1.23 V. Therefore, the requirement of a bandgap is larger than the required energy for water splitting (1.23 eV).For more details, the valence band potential must be more positive than the O2/H2O redox potential of 1.23 V versus Normal hydrogen electrode (NHE , pH = 0) to permit water oxidation, and the conduction band must be more negative than the H + /H2 redox potential of 0 V versus NHE to facilitate water reduction [8][9][10].In PWS systems, photocatalysts play an important role in the conversion of solar energy to hydrogen in response to visible light in the water-splitting system.The hydrogen gas production process involves a photocatalytic reaction such as the direct conversion of solar energy into hydrogen gas in a semiconductor with an energy bandgap that is positioned between their energy band structures.
Step 1: Light (photons) is absorbed near the surface of the semiconducting materials with energies greater than their bandgap energy (e.g., ~1.7 eV).Excited electrons (excitons) and holes are generated inside the semiconducting materials by bandgap excitation.
Step 2: The electrons and holes henceforth referred to as photogenerated electrons and holes are separated in the bandgap and drift to the surface of the semiconducting materials, causing the release of oxygen from water (catalytic water oxidation reaction).
Step 3: The photogenerated electrons combine with H + via the metal electrode (catalytic water reduction reaction).
Figure 2 shows the principle of photocatalytic water-splitting reactions with photoelectrons and holes that are generated by the absorption of light.The photoelectrons and holes reduce and oxidize water on the surface of the semiconductors as the two half-reactions of water splitting via the following reactions [10][11][12].The water-splitting reaction is thermodynamically nonspontaneous, and therefore is an uphill reaction.As such, the net Gibbs free energy (ΔG ≈ 237 kJ/mol) needs to be increased.Namely, if a photocatalyst has a bandgap that is larger than the energy required for water splitting (~1.23 eV), then its conduction and valence band edge should contain the oxidation and reduction potential of water [8].

Cathode: Water Reduction of H
It is clear that the O2/H2O redox potential difference is 1.23 V. Therefore, the requirement of a bandgap is larger than the required energy for water splitting (1.23 eV).For more details, the valence band potential must be more positive than the O2/H2O redox potential of 1.23 V versus Normal hydrogen electrode (NHE , pH = 0) to permit water oxidation, and the conduction band must be more negative than the H + /H2 redox potential of 0 V versus NHE to facilitate water reduction [8][9][10].The water-splitting reaction is thermodynamically nonspontaneous, and therefore is an uphill reaction.As such, the net Gibbs free energy (∆G ≈ 237 kJ/mol) needs to be increased.Namely, if a photocatalyst has a bandgap that is larger than the energy required for water splitting (~1.23 eV), then its conduction and valence band edge should contain the oxidation and reduction potential of water [8].
It is clear that the O 2 /H 2 O redox potential difference is 1.23 V. Therefore, the requirement of a bandgap is larger than the required energy for water splitting (1.23 eV).For more details, the valence band potential must be more positive than the O 2 /H 2 O redox potential of 1.23 V versus Normal hydrogen electrode (NHE, pH = 0) to permit water oxidation, and the conduction band must be more negative than the H + /H 2 redox potential of 0 V versus NHE to facilitate water reduction [8][9][10].

Solar Energy to Hydrogen Conversion System for Solar Water Splitting
Among the previously mentioned hydrogen production systems, i.e., the PC, PEC, and PV-PEC, the PC offers reasonable solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, a low process cost, simplicity of design, and a large-scale method for water splitting.Moreover, the PC reaction could be performed in the homogeneous phase without transparent electrodes and directional illumination.However, a PC system should be inserted in a gas separator because both hydrogen and oxygen gases are produced during the water-splitting process.Therefore, an enclosed reaction system is required on a large-scale [10,[14][15][16].However, the PEC systems do not require gas separation due to their structure, which entails one or two conductive electrodes and a small bias.The two different gases are sequentially generated and remain at the opposite electrodes.
A PEC cell system is composed of an electrolyte, an n-type semiconductor (anode), and a p-type semiconductor (cathode) with a semiconductor/liquid junction, as shown in Figure 3. Photogenerated charge carriers are separated, and minor carriers (holes and electrons originated from p-/n-type semiconductor electrodes) move within the semiconductor-liquid interface.This allows for the separate release of oxygen and hydrogen gases during the water-splitting reaction.

Solar Energy to Hydrogen Conversion System for Solar Water Splitting
Among the previously mentioned hydrogen production systems, i.e., the PC, PEC, and PV-PEC, the PC offers reasonable solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, a low process cost, simplicity of design, and a large-scale method for water splitting.Moreover, the PC reaction could be performed in the homogeneous phase without transparent electrodes and directional illumination.However, a PC system should be inserted in a gas separator because both hydrogen and oxygen gases are produced during the water-splitting process.Therefore, an enclosed reaction system is required on a large-scale [10,[14][15][16].However, the PEC systems do not require gas separation due to their structure, which entails one or two conductive electrodes and a small bias.The two different gases are sequentially generated and remain at the opposite electrodes.
A PEC cell system is composed of an electrolyte, an n-type semiconductor (anode), and a p-type semiconductor (cathode) with a semiconductor/liquid junction, as shown in Figure 3. Photogenerated charge carriers are separated, and minor carriers (holes and electrons originated from p-/n-type semiconductor electrodes) move within the semiconductor-liquid interface.This allows for the separate release of oxygen and hydrogen gases during the water-splitting reaction.In electrode-liquid electrolyte systems, the photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical reaction behavior is mainly conducted in three steps: (1) light absorption, (2) water reduction and oxidation, and (3) the recombination of electrons and holes.When the system is exposed to photons with sufficiently high light energy, they are induced to form electron-hole pairs, resulting in chemical reactions such as oxidation-reduction reactions.During these reactions, photogenerated currents and voltages are observed inside the system.Such electrical phenomena can be observed in both photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical systems.The photovoltaic (PV) process is so-called because the conversion of light into electricity occurs in a photoelectrode through a process of conversion photons.In the case of a photoelectrochemical process, the generated photons induce a chemical reaction in the electrodes.Since both photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical processes are related to light absorbance and the conversion of photons to induce chemicals reactions, various semiconducting materials can be used to convert solar energy to hydrogen.They have been extensively used in the past for solar water splitting [17,18].
Until now, several different concepts have been proposed and reported from different research groups for solar water splitting.Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of an enhanced PEC and PV-PEC hybrid water splitting system, which was proposed to improve solar energy to hydrogen efficiency.The PV/PEC hybrid cell consists of a photoelectrode PEC cell and a PV cell.The PV cells play an important role in supplying a potential to the PV cell.The PV cell assists the PEC cell to In electrode-liquid electrolyte systems, the photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical reaction behavior is mainly conducted in three steps: (1) light absorption, (2) water reduction and oxidation, and (3) the recombination of electrons and holes.When the system is exposed to photons with sufficiently high light energy, they are induced to form electron-hole pairs, resulting in chemical reactions such as oxidation-reduction reactions.During these reactions, photogenerated currents and voltages are observed inside the system.Such electrical phenomena can be observed in both photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical systems.The photovoltaic (PV) process is so-called because the conversion of light into electricity occurs in a photoelectrode through a process of conversion photons.In the case of a photoelectrochemical process, the generated photons induce a chemical reaction in the electrodes.Since both photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical processes are related to light absorbance and the conversion of photons to induce chemicals reactions, various semiconducting materials can be used to convert solar energy to hydrogen.They have been extensively used in the past for solar water splitting [17,18].
Until now, several different concepts have been proposed and reported from different research groups for solar water splitting.Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of an enhanced PEC and PV-PEC hybrid water splitting system, which was proposed to improve solar energy to hydrogen efficiency.The PV/PEC hybrid cell consists of a photoelectrode PEC cell and a PV cell.The PV cells play an important role in supplying a potential to the PV cell.The PV cell assists the PEC cell to develop a potential for photogenerated electrons, allowing water reduction at the surface of the photocathode [19,20].

Strategy for High Solar-to-Hydrogen (STH) Efficiencies
The energy conversion efficiency in solar water-splitting cells is usually evaluated by various methods such as standard solar-to-hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiency (η STH ), quantum efficiencies such as the incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE), photon-to-current efficiency (ABPE), and the absorbed photon-to-current conversion efficiency (APCE) [21,22].Among these, we will further examine the standard η STH and ABPE in greater detail.
The standard η STH is the ratio between the total energy generated and the total energy input in the sunlight irradiation of AM 1.5 G (air mass at a solar zenith angle of 48.2 • ), which can be calculated using following the equation: where ∆G is the Gibbs free energy (237 kJ/mol), r H is the rate of hydrogen production in moles per second, P sun is the incident light intensity (100 mW/cm 2 ) and S is the illuminated area of the photoelectrode (cm 2 ).The ABPE can be calculated from the J-V curve of the photoelectrode while an external bias is applied to the two electrodes.

Strategy to Improve High STH Efficiency for Water Splitting
Solar water splitting with high STH efficiencies has been developed over the last few years.Recently, Jia et al. [23] reported on solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis STH with an efficiency over 30% for two days using two polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers in series with one InGaP/GaAs/GaInNAs(Sb) triple junction solar cell.
To achieve high STH efficiency for solar water splitting, we should carefully select the semiconducting materials.The bandgap of the semiconducting materials, including the electrode, is very important in the solar water-splitting process.Most photons cannot be absorbed by the semiconductor if they have energy that is lower than the bandgap energy.Therefore, the bandgap of the selected semiconducting materials must be chosen in the range of at least ~1.23-2.0eV to absorb light in the visible range, which facilitates a high photocatalytic effect.The semiconducting materials used for the cells should have strong catalytic activity and stability regardless of the oxidation/reduction reaction.With regard to the process, the semiconductor is easily oxidized and reduced by excited electrons and holes.Since their photoreproductive capability decreases, the cell's STH efficiency also decreases.Additionally, the materials used for cells should be easily modified and readily available at low cost [23][24][25].

Ferroelectric Effect and Materials
The basic concept of ferroelectricity was introduced by Rochelle salt in 1920: if an external electric field is applied to a ferroelectric material, the dipoles in the crystalline or polycrystalline structure are induced to produce a ferroelectric phenomenon with spontaneous polarization and alignment with the external field.Even when the electric field is switched off, the material maintains a spontaneous polarization.This is called the ferroelectric phenomenon.Furthermore, the spontaneous polarization is reversed by the application of an electric field.Ferroelectrics exhibit a phase transition phenomenon.
Namely, the polarization of the dipoles exhibits interactive electric dipole moments with and without an applied electric field.When the ferroelectric is at a higher temperature than the phase transition temperature, the spontaneous polarization is lost due to thermal fluctuations.
When the spontaneous polarization is reversed, it causes the ferroelectrics to exhibit the property of piezoelectricity.Ferroelectric materials can be categorized into two types: the order-disorder type and the displacement type, based on the physical mechanism used to generate the ferroelectric characteristics.
Ferroelectric materials, which are mostly used as condenser and as semiconductor elements, are a cubic system with a perovskite structure.When the crystal structure of the perovskite exceeds the Curie temperature T c (~120 • C), similar to a ferroelectric crystal of the ABO 3 perovskite structure, it changes its form to a paraelectric phase in which the crystal structure is the cubic symmetry [26,27].

Ferroelectric Photovoltaics-Phenomenology of Ferroelectric Solar Cells
The photovoltaic effect in a semiconducting material occurs when an asymmetry in the electric potential occurs throughout the materials due to a flow of photogenerated electrons and holes.A photocurrent occurs as a result of the absorption of photons with high energy, which leads to the transfer of electrons from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB).
Conventional photovoltaic phenomenon could be observed in interfaced doped semiconductors such the p-n junction structure when the following three processes should be involved: high light absorption, generation of the electron-hole pairs, and separation of the free charges.
Usually, hole (positive charge) and electron (negative charge) carriers are generated by high energy photons.Over time, the excited carriers return to the ground-state level, and the internally absorbed energies are released as light or heat.While most commercial solar cells are based on the p-n junction principle between two different metallic contacts, they are limited by the so-called Shockley-Queisser limit, which prevents any single p-n junction solar cell from converting more than 33.7% of the incident light [23].Their heterojunction structure is limited with regard to the selection of potential materials due to dopant issues and the mismatched lattice of the structure.
Ferroelectric materials have been recently proposed as excellent potential candidates to solve these problems.The phenomenon of a photovoltaic effect in a ferroelectric has been observed in BaTiO 3 , LiNbO 3 , and Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 with weak pyroelectric currents (photovoltaic current above Tc).However, ferroelectrics have a significant disadvantage of large band gaps in the range of ~3-4 eV, which is challenging for applications as photovoltaic materials.Their large band gaps values result in the degradation of efficient conversion because small current densities and large open circuit photovoltages are typical.In recent years, the higher efficiency of narrower bandgap ferroelectrics in ferroelectric solar cells such as those of BiFeO 3 (BFO, 2.2-2.7 eV) and multiferroic Bi 12 FeCrO 6 (BFCO, 1.9-2.1 eV), has been reported.
Ferroelectric photovoltaic effects are divided into photoferroic phenomena including the bulk photovoltaic effect (BPE) and the anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE).Photoferroic phenomena could be demonstrated in hybrid organic-inorganic halide perovskites such as CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 (MAPI) to fabricate high-efficiency photovoltaic devices.Ferroelectric domains as internal junctions can induce the generation of photoexcited electrons and hole pairs, and decrease recombination by dividing charged carriers.The effect could produce a higher open circuit voltage (V OC ) and the current−voltage hysteresis observed in perovskite solar cells.The photoferroic system has an intricate interface between the photoresponse and the ferroelectric phase stability, single/multidomain, and distributions.The photoferroic system has recently achieved power efficacies in excess of 8% power for Bi 2 FeCrO 6 [26].The larger bandgap (~3 eV) in the polar materials shows their potential for development as light absorbers [25][26][27].
The photovoltaic effect (BPE) is a phenomenon that is observed in an open circuit voltage under dark illumination.The BPE generates a photovoltaic current that results in an anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE), as a type of bulk photovoltaic effect that occurs between semiconductors and insulators as a result of an open-circuit voltage induced by light.Sometimes, the generated voltage approaches almost thousands of volts.
The mechanisms of the anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE) are schematically represented in Figure 4.The generated photovoltage in the anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE) is limited by its bandgap.This results in a photoresponse of the heterojunctions, the photo-Dember effect, and grain boundaries.As shown in Figure 4, its mechanisms could be explained by three categories as follows: (a) the photo-Dember effect, (b) p-n homojunction domains, (c) and ferroelectric domains [27,28].The mechanisms of the anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE) are schematically represented in Figure 4.The generated photovoltage in the anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE) is limited by its bandgap.This results in a photoresponse of the heterojunctions, the photo-Dember effect, and grain boundaries.As shown in Figure 4, its mechanisms could be explained by three categories as follows: (a) the photo-Dember effect, (b) p-n homojunction domains, (c) and ferroelectric domains [27,28].

General Requirements for Photoelectrode Materials
The choice of appropriate materials for photoelectrodes plays a decisive role in the PEC activity for water splitting.Conventional materials, including semiconductors, can be categorized into widebandgap and narrow band-gap materials.Traditionally, wide-bandgap materials (TiO2, SrTiO3, BaTiO3, and WO3) are considerably stable in an electrolyte solution, but they can have the limited absorbance range in the ultraviolet region.Even though narrow bandgap materials (Cu2O, InAs, and CuO) can absorb much more visible light irradiation in the solar spectrum, they have a high possibility of being damaged from strong electrolytic environments.However, we do not have many options for selecting suitable materials for photoelectrodes (photocathodes and photoanodes) of PEC.For photocatalytic water splitting, the selected materials must have bandgaps of approximately 2 eV (at least 1.23 eV) as a result of thermodynamic energy and kinetic loss.Figure 5 shows the bandgap of various materials.Therefore, it is imperative that the following general requirements are met prior to the fabrication of high-performance PECs [12,29,30].

General Requirements for Photoelectrode Materials
The choice of appropriate materials for photoelectrodes plays a decisive role in the PEC activity for water splitting.Conventional materials, including semiconductors, can be categorized into wide-bandgap and narrow band-gap materials.Traditionally, wide-bandgap materials (TiO 2 , SrTiO 3 , BaTiO 3 , and WO 3 ) are considerably stable in an electrolyte solution, but they can have the limited absorbance range in the ultraviolet region.Even though narrow bandgap materials (Cu 2 O, InAs, and CuO) can absorb much more visible light irradiation in the solar spectrum, they have a high possibility of being damaged from strong electrolytic environments.However, we do not have many options for selecting suitable materials for photoelectrodes (photocathodes and photoanodes) of PEC.For photocatalytic water splitting, the selected materials must have bandgaps of approximately 2 eV (at least 1.23 eV) as a result of thermodynamic energy and kinetic loss.Figure 5 shows the bandgap of various materials.Therefore, it is imperative that the following general requirements are met prior to the fabrication of high-performance PECs [12,29,30].
CuO) can absorb much more visible light irradiation in the solar spectrum, they have a high possibility of being damaged from strong electrolytic environments.However, we do not have many options for selecting suitable materials for photoelectrodes (photocathodes and photoanodes) of PEC.For photocatalytic water splitting, the selected materials must have bandgaps of approximately 2 eV (at least 1.23 eV) as a result of thermodynamic energy and kinetic loss.Figure 5 shows the bandgap of various materials.Therefore, it is imperative that the following general requirements are met prior to the fabrication of high-performance PECs [12,29,30].(i) Suitable bandgap energy and band edge positions.The electrolysis of water is composed of two reactions occurring at different electrodes.There is a reduction reaction generating hydrogen with H + /H 2 redox potential of 0 V vs. NHE at the photocathode, whilst the O 2 /H 2 O redox potential of 1.23 V vs. NHE (pH = 0) in an oxidation reaction at the photoanode; thus, the bandgap of the materials needs to be larger than 1.23 V in order to be able to occur water split.In addition, the thermodynamic energy losses (0.3-0.4 V) and an overpotential (0.4-0.6 V) should also be considered.Consequently, a minimum bandgap of ~1.8 eV is required.Furthermore, visible light is very limited below 390 nm, and this limits the upper value of the bandgap energy to 3.2 eV.Therefore, materials with a bandgap energy in the range between 1.9-3.2eV are promising candidates for the generation of large photovoltages.When a photoelectrode material that meets these requirements with respect to the bandgap value absorbs incoming photons, electrons are excited to the conduction band (CB) and leave holes in the valence band (VB).The CB edge must be more negative than the H + /H 2 redox potential of 0 V versus normal hydrogen electrodes (NHEs) (pH = 0) to induce H 2 production, while the VB edge value must be more positive than the O 2 /H 2 O redox potential of 1.23 V versus NHE to generate water oxidation.
(ii) Efficient charge separation and transfer.Low efficiency in PEC devices is mostly attributed to charge recombination and inefficient carrier transportation.As a result, many studies have been performed with the objective of addressing these challenges to achieve enhanced performance on PEC devices.Both the intrinsic properties (hole and electron mobility) and the extrinsic properties (crystallinity, nanostructure) affect the separation and transfer of the photogenerated carriers.
(iii) Robust catalytic activity and stability.Generally, there are energy barriers for the transfer of electrons or holes, and these barriers exhibit energy losses in the reaction.Appropriately rapid surface reaction kinetics can overcome these barriers and suppress electron-hole recombination.In PEC systems, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) generates H 2 from H + (in acid) or H 2 O (in base), whereas oxygen evolution reaction produces O 2 from H 2 O (in acidic) and OH − (in base) [31,32].Photocorrosion is a major problem for long-term PEC cells because of water splitting, which leads to the decomposition and fluctuation of photocurrent in a short time interval, especially in harsh conditions (strongly acidic or alkaline).However, a high ionic environment (low or high pH) is essential to minimize other challenges such as ohmic losses and localized pH gradient overpotentials in the PEC systems of separate photoelectrodes [33,34].Therefore, ferroelectric materials with intrinsically stable properties even in harsh electrolyte are potential candidates for the generation of new PEC systems.Furthermore, the suitable alignment between the band edge potentials of the candidate materials and the relative decomposition potentials can promote stable PEC devices.Lastly, cost-effective materials along with earth-abundant elements are also required for a practical approach.

Ferroelectric-Based Materials in Photocathodes for Hydrogen
Promising photocathodes are generally p-type semiconductors and must meet some of the aforementioned requirements to generate the required cathodic current for water reduction.Single metallic oxides such as Cu 2 O, CuO, and NiO are at the forefront of the p-type semiconductors that have been investigated as photocathodes for solar water splitting.However, these materials are hindered by some major shortcomings such as photocorrosion [35,36], low conduction band position [37][38][39] and wide bandgap (3.6-4.0 eV), along with the low potential of the valence band [40,41].As a result, the PEC devices fabricated from conventional single semiconductors exhibit a limited photocurrent and low stability, thereby reducing their PEC performance.Therefore, the possibility of incorporating ferroelectrics into conventional oxide-based photocathodes is a novel and facile way to enhance their PEC activity.In this section, the review is focused on ferroelectric-based materials for photocathodes, which include ferroelectric ternary/quaternary metal oxides.

Ferroelectric Oxide Perovskites Ternary Metal Oxides
(1) BiFeO 3 BiFeO 3 (BFO) is a well-known multiferroic material with a bandgap in the range of 2.2-2.7 eV, which has been researched extensively because it possesses a wide range of intriguing properties [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51].Many studies have been reported on the significant effect of polarization on band bending in BFO, which plays a crucial role in the photocatalytic activity for PEC water splitting.This enhanced charge separation is attributed to the intimate relation between band bending and the separation of photoexcited electron-hole pairs in the space charge region [52].Depending on the fabrication method, BFO can exhibit properties of either an n or p-type semiconducting material, thereby playing a role as either an anodic or cathodic electrode in PEC water splitting [42,45,47,51].
Although BFO presents robust ferroelectricity and has attracted significant interest from researchers involved in PEC water-splitting research, there are two challenges that limit the tremendous potential of BFO as a photoelectrode material.The first issue is the low photocathodic current due to the rapid recombination of electron-hole pairs, which is required to achieve a better PEC performance.Another challenge is the rapid degradation during the PEC reaction [53,54].Undoubtedly, the noble metal Pt is by far the best-performing photocathode for H 2 evolution to date [55].Theoretically, a combination of BFO and a noble metal such as Pt is considered a good choice to facilitate H 2 generation reaction.This can be explained by the reduced charge recombination and enhanced electric field that is attributed to the Schottky barrier due to the different work functions between BFO and Pt as well as the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect of these noble metals [56,57].However, contact between Pt and BFO impedes the transfer of photoexcited electrons from an electrode surface to the electrolyte due to the Schottky upward barrier.Fortunately, the injection of a buffer layer between Pt and BFO has been discovered to overcome this shortcoming.
Gu et al.
[53] inserted a porous carbon layer sandwiched between Pt and BFO to obtain a ITO/BFO/carbon/Pt photocathode in order to inhibit the formation of a BFO/Pt Schottky upward barrier.As a result, drastically enhanced photocathodic performance is achieved with a photocurrent density (J o ) and onset potential (V op ) up to −235.4 µA/cm 2 and 1.19 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), respectively, while the values for a photocathode without a carbon interlayer are only −61.6 µA/cm 2 and 0.83 V versus RHE, respectively.More importantly, the BFO films were macroscopically poled to investigate the effect of the ferroelectric polarization on the PEC performance, and the results are reported in Figure 6.After poling, the J o and V op values increased significantly, which is attributed to the effective separation of the photogenerated carriers in the BFO films, thereby enhancing the PEC activity of the photocathodes.density (Jo) and onset potential (Vop) up to −235.4 µ A/cm 2 and 1.19 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), respectively, while the values for a photocathode without a carbon interlayer are only −61.6 µ A/cm 2 and 0.83 V versus RHE, respectively.More importantly, the BFO films were macroscopically poled to investigate the effect of the ferroelectric polarization on the PEC performance, and the results are reported in Figure 6.After poling, the Jo and Vop values increased significantly, which is attributed to the effective separation of the photogenerated carriers in the BFO films, thereby enhancing the PEC activity of the photocathodes.The novel configuration with carbon resulted in a reduced charge recombination and the facilitation of charge transfer by the removal of the upward barrier between Pt and BFO.Based on this result, an amorphous TiO2 was chosen as a buffer layer to insert between BFO and Pt with the The novel configuration with carbon resulted in a reduced charge recombination and the facilitation of charge transfer by the removal of the upward barrier between Pt and BFO.Based on this result, an amorphous TiO 2 was chosen as a buffer layer to insert between BFO and Pt with the similar desire for the Schottky barrier [58].As expected, the PEC yielded a J o of −460 µA/cm 2 at 0 V versus RHE and V op of 1.25 V versus RHE under 100 mW/cm 2 Xe-lamp illumination.More importantly, the role of TiO 2 in stabilizing the photocathode is apparent with a 10-h continuous effective PEC reaction in an acid solution.Meanwhile, most of the BFO photocathodic performance is degradable within only 2 h of continuous reaction, even when measured using the neutral Na 2 SO 4 electrolyte [53,54].The limitation of the performance of PEC cells used BFO as photocathodes could be overcome by an interlayer TiO 2 as protection layer to avoid direct contact with its electrolyte.This interpretation could show a promising pathway to reduce cathodic photocorrosion at the semiconductor/electrolyte interface by employing a variety of protection layers on the photocathodes.To utilize a wide range of the visible light spectrum, tandem PEC systems composed of both photoanodes and photocathodes have been investigated in many recent studies [59,60].Among many tandem architectures, the photocathodes based on the crystal Si-pn + were constructed with an improvement in PEC activity [61,62].However, the efficiency is far from the desired value because of the remaining photoexcited electrons inside the holes of Si.In a recent report, Cheng et al. [54] overcame his shortcoming to fabricate a Si-pnn + /ITO/Au/BFO hybrid photocathode with enhanced photocurrent and onset potential by utilizing the local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect of Au nanoparticles and the depolarization electric field of BFO.
(2) LaFeO 3 LaFeO 3 (LFO) is an n-type semiconducting perovskite oxide that has emerged as an attractive candidate for photoelectrochemical water splitting because of its many advantages, such as high stability under illumination in an aqueous environment, and abundant quantity of rare-earth element oxides [59,60].The bandgap of LFO is estimated to be from 2.0 eV to 2.6 eV, which is small enough to utilize a portion of the visible spectrum light [39].
Although LFO has stood out as a promising perovskite oxide, it still has some drawbacks that limit its use as an effective photocathode for hydrogen production [63][64][65][66][67].The LFO photocathode in PEC shows low photoresponse characteristics because of the lack of a sophisticated preparative technique [68].The p-type LFO film, which is prepared by more sophisticated fabrication techniques such as pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and atomic layer deposition (ALD) as a photocathode coupling with an n-type Fe 2 O 3 photoanode for stable water splitting, has assisted in the suppression of the aforementioned limitation [63,69].High-quality LFO films and good back contacts resulted in the generation of a photocurrent density at 0 V versus RHE of 64.5 µA/cm 2 under AM 1.5 G irradiation for 100 nm of LFO, while the reaction time was maintained for 120 h without any obvious decline of the rate of oxygen and hydrogen production [63].In addition, under external bias, the Fe 2 O 3 -LaFeO 3 system shows outstanding performance in both the development of the gas evolution rates and stability, even in alkaline conditions, in comparison with an Fe 2 O 3 -Pt system.Furthermore, the modified LFO photocathode with high performance, especially its long-term stability and low cost, could be considered one of the promising candidates to replace the normal Pt photocathode in PEC systems.
Although the low photoresponse problem was solved by PLD instead of the sol-gel spin-coating method, the value of the photocurrent onset potential was ~1.0 V versus RHE, which is lower than the standard potential of 1.23 V for water electrolysis.Recent efforts to enhance the photoelectrochemical behavior of LFO has yielded many positive results.Díez-Garcia et al. [70] synthesized metal-doped LFO thin film electrodes using the sol-gel method, resulting in a significant improvement in efficiency, with an onset potential as high as 1.4 V versus RHE.The enhancement of the efficiency in PCE devices is attributed to an increase of both majority carrier density and mobility by doping with a relatively large amount of Mg 2+ and Zn 2+ (5% with respect to the iron atoms).
In addition, it is reported that metal doping is an effective strategy for enhancing the p-type nature of the ternary oxides [71].In particular, LFOs have been shown to exhibit both cathodic and anodic photocurrents depending on the specific conditions [72].Although sophisticated fabrication techniques such as PLD can improve the PEC response of LFO photocathodes, the high cost and challenging technical requirements are still primary impediments.Recently, novel research in the preparation of nanostructured LFO thin films using an inexpensive spray-pyrolysis method resulted in outstanding results [73].The fabricated photoelectrode yielded a photocurrent density of 0.16 mA/cm 2 at 0.26 V versus RHE, which is by far a more drastic enhancement compared to the PLD technique [63].
Interestingly, this is the first time that spontaneous hydrogen generation has been achieved using PEC water splitting without any external bias voltage using LFO as a single photoelectrode material.Admittedly, LFO is a potential candidate for a photocathode because of its stable characteristics in aqueous solutions, as well as its very positive onset potential values.However, further research should be performed to improve the slow kinetics of charge transfer, which favors recombination at surface trap states.
(3) SrTiO 3 Among the various ternary metal oxides, SrTiO 3 (STO), which is a stable n-type semiconductor with a bandgap value of 3.25 eV [74], has been utilized as a promising photoelectrode for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, with many outstanding properties.However, a wide bandgap limits light absorption to the UV region.
Since the first report by Wrighton et al. [75] on the usefulness of STO for light-assisted photocatalytic water splitting, numerous studies have focused on bandgap engineering [76][77][78] and the tuning of the charge separation ability [79][80][81] to overcome the aforementioned drawbacks and achieve effective photoelectrochemical water splitting.It is expected that a heterojunction of STO with a small bandgap material should be able to narrow the overall bandgap and help suppress the limitation of visible light absorption.TiO 2 is a conventional n-type semiconductor, which is considered as the most promising photoanode material [82][83][84][85], and Cu 2 O is one of the most investigated p-type semiconductors for PEC water-splitting.It is reported that loading Cu 2 O particles on TiO 2 nanotube arrays can significantly improve visible light absorption compared with pure TiO 2 nanotubes [86].Meanwhile, there is a similar valence and conduction band position between STO and TiO 2 , with a conduction band edge that is about 200 mV higher than TiO 2 [87].Recently, Cu 2 O has been combined with STO with controllable thickness to form a Cu 2 O/STO heterojunction photoelectrode, which has been proven to be effective in driving the separation of charge carriers by an electric field generated at the Cu 2 O/STO interface [88].Under illumination, the Cu 2 O/STO photoelectrode presented a p-type photocurrent used for hydrogen generation.As expected, the Cu 2 O/STO heterojunction with an optimal thickness of 343 nm exhibited a photocurrent density of 2.52 mA/cm 2 at 0.8 V versus saturated calomel electrode (SCE), which is 25 times higher than that of pristine Cu 2 O (0.10 mA/cm 2 at 0.8 V versus SCE), as presented in Figure 7.This result is attributed to the synergy of broadening solar absorption and improved charge transportation in the Cu 2 O/STO heterojunction.In another report, the Cu 2 O/STO heterojunction photocathode was investigated using a less complicated method in which Cu 2 O nanoparticles (NPs) were loaded onto the surface of STO nanocubes (NCs) through a facile deposition-precipitation technique [89].

(4) PbTiO3
PbTiO3 (PTO) is a visible light active titania-based perovskite oxide that is well-known for its high ferroelectricity.It is a good candidate as a photocatalytic material in water splitting due to its bandgap value of 2.75 eV and suitable band structure, which assists in charge transfer and separation [90][91][92].However, there are a limited number of studies on the application of PTO as a photoelectrode material with demonstrated higher photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution, especially in the case of PEC devices.
Recently, transition metal-doped PTO was investigated as a photocathode material for improving photogenerated electron transfer on the photocathode/electrolyte interface [92,93].In particular, the 1 wt % Cu-doped PTO photoelectrode in an aqueous methanol solution under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm) presented 2.5 times higher photocatalytic performance compared to PTO without Cu loading using the same configuration [92].
In another report, Hu et al. [93] modified the ITO/PTO photocathode using both Fe (III) doping and grafting, which resulted in a photocurrent increases of up to 220 µA/cm 2 in comparison with 38 µA/cm 2 of pure PTO photocathode.These enhancements were attributed to the change of band positions, which facilitated the transfer of photoinduced charge carriers.A similar phenomenon was observed for a fabricated Ag-Pt bimetallic catalyst on a ferroelectric PTO photocathode surface deposited on ITO quartz glass.As a result, the photocurrent density increased significantly from 60 µA/cm 2 for pure PTO electrode to 202 µA/cm 2 for the Ag-Pt electrode one under 0 V versus SCE, and with a 100 mW/cm 2 Xe lamp illumination [94].
Due to the superior performance of PTO in comparison with other TiO2-based perovskite-type oxide materials (BaTiO3, SrTiO3) and their stability, some innovative synthesis methods have been introduced such as microwave-assisted synthesis [95,96] and nonhydrolytic sol-gel [97].A promising and effective PTO photocathode with higher photocurrent efficiency has been achieved using such facile and cost-effective synthesis methods.
(5) YFeO3 YFeO3 is one of the ferrite perovskites featuring a bandgap energy of approximately 2.3-2.4 eV.PbTiO 3 (PTO) is a visible light active titania-based perovskite oxide that is well-known for its high ferroelectricity.It is a good candidate as a photocatalytic material in water splitting due to its bandgap value of 2.75 eV and suitable band structure, which assists in charge transfer and separation [90][91][92].However, there are a limited number of studies on the application of PTO as a photoelectrode material with demonstrated higher photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution, especially in the case of PEC devices.
Recently, transition metal-doped PTO was investigated as a photocathode material for improving photogenerated electron transfer on the photocathode/electrolyte interface [92,93].In particular, the 1 wt % Cu-doped PTO photoelectrode in an aqueous methanol solution under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm) presented 2.5 times higher photocatalytic performance compared to PTO without Cu loading using the same configuration [92].
In another report, Hu et al. [93] modified the ITO/PTO photocathode using both Fe (III) doping and grafting, which resulted in a photocurrent increases of up to 220 µA/cm 2 in comparison with 38 µA/cm 2 of pure PTO photocathode.These enhancements were attributed to the change of band positions, which facilitated the transfer of photoinduced charge carriers.A similar phenomenon was observed for a fabricated Ag-Pt bimetallic catalyst on a ferroelectric PTO photocathode surface deposited on ITO quartz glass.As a result, the photocurrent density increased significantly from 60 µA/cm 2 for pure PTO electrode to 202 µA/cm 2 for the Ag-Pt electrode one under 0 V versus SCE, and with a 100 mW/cm 2 Xe lamp illumination [94].
Due to the superior performance of PTO in comparison with other TiO 2 -based perovskite-type oxide materials (BaTiO 3 , SrTiO 3 ) and their stability, some innovative synthesis methods have been introduced such as microwave-assisted synthesis [95,96] and nonhydrolytic sol-gel [97].A promising and effective PTO photocathode with higher photocurrent efficiency has been achieved using such facile and cost-effective synthesis methods.
(5) YFeO 3 YFeO 3 is one of the ferrite perovskites featuring a bandgap energy of approximately 2.3-2.4 eV.Although several studies have been performed on the utilization of YFeO 3 as a photocatalyst for water splitting [98][99][100][101], research on YFeO 3 as a photocathode material in PEC devices remains limited.YFeO 3 thin films are prepared by two different methodologies: nanoparticle thin film electrode via an ionic liquid protocol [68], and compact thin film electrode via a sol-gel method.Both types of electrodes have been evaluated for their PEC activity.They show exhibited cathodic photocurrent responses with an onset potential of 1.05 V versus RHE with complex dynamic features that should be addressed to application in PEC water splitting [102].

Quaternary Metal Oxides
Quaternary metal oxides, especially double perovskite materials featuring ferroelectric behavior, have been identified as promising candidates for solar energy to electricity conversion because of their efficient charge separation, which results from suitable control of the polarization-induced internal electric field [103,104].Bi 2 FeCrO 6 (BFCO) exhibiting multiferroic properties plays a role as a photocathode with a narrow bandgap (1.9-2.1 eV), and an appropriate conduction band position, which shows a twofold increase of the photocurrent density after negative poling, as presented in Figure 8 [105].Recently, Shen et al. performed many studies on Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 (PZT) and revealed that ferroelectric PZT films deposited on indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated quartz glass [106,107] along with PZT films decorated with Ag nanoparticles on an ITO coated Si-pn + junction [108] can function as stable and effective photocathodes for water splitting.More importantly, polarization switching can drive the photogenerated electrons transfer process, which then results in significantly enhanced PEC activity.photocurrent responses with an onset potential of 1.05 V versus RHE with complex dynamic features that should be addressed to application in PEC water splitting [102].

Quaternary Metal Oxides
Quaternary metal oxides, especially double perovskite materials featuring ferroelectric behavior, have been identified as promising candidates for solar energy to electricity conversion because of their efficient charge separation, which results from suitable control of the polarizationinduced internal electric field [103,104].Bi2FeCrO6 (BFCO) exhibiting multiferroic properties plays a role as a photocathode with a narrow bandgap (1.9-2.1 eV), and an appropriate conduction band position, which shows a twofold increase of the photocurrent density after negative poling, as presented in Figure 8 [105].Recently, Shen et al. performed many studies on Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 (PZT) and revealed that ferroelectric PZT films deposited on indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated quartz glass [106,107] along with PZT films decorated with Ag nanoparticles on an ITO coated Si-pn + junction [108] can function as stable and effective photocathodes for water splitting.More importantly, polarization switching can drive the photogenerated electrons transfer process, which then results in significantly enhanced PEC activity.

Ferroelectric-Based Materials in Photoanodes for Water
Photoanode materials, which possess bandgap values that utilize a wide range of visible light absorption, high carrier mobility, and the possibility of efficient charge transport and separation, generally stem from n-type semiconductors.In addition, they are cost-effective materials that have a long-term stability in aqueous solution, and are therefore considered promising candidates for PEC water splitting.In this section, ferroelectric-based materials are incorporated in a photoanodic configuration with various nanostructures via optimal fabrication techniques.

Ferroelectric-Based Materials in Photoanodes for Water
Photoanode materials, which possess bandgap values that utilize a wide range of visible light absorption, high carrier mobility, and the possibility of efficient charge transport and separation, generally stem from n-type semiconductors.In addition, they are cost-effective materials that have a long-term stability in aqueous solution, and are therefore considered promising candidates for PEC water splitting.In this section, ferroelectric-based materials are incorporated in a photoanodic configuration with various nanostructures via optimal fabrication techniques.

Ferroelectric Oxide Perovskites
(1) BaTiO 3 BaTiO 3 (BTO) is an n-type semiconductor, and its ferroelectricity was discovered for the first time in 1945 by Wul and Goldman [109].Subsequently, the relation between photocurrent efficiency and the change in the electrode potential for the photooxidation of water was first investigated by Kennedy [110] in 1976.This was a precursor to advanced studies on this promising ferroelectric material.Apart from possessing a favorable structure for water splitting [111], BTO is considered as a potential photoelectrode material because of its high stability in aqueous solution along with a suitable band edge position, and controllable electronic properties through lattice defect modification or oxygen stoichiometry [112,113].However, the only disadvantage of BTO is a relatively large bandgap of 3.2 eV, which limits its absorption spectrum to the ultraviolet region [114].
Therefore, many previous reports [115,116] were focused on doping BTO with Fe to extend its photoresponse for effective PEC activity.More importantly, it was reported that the ferroelectric polarization in BTO could enhance PEC performance in comparison with pristine TiO 2 .This is a result of the facilitation of the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs along with the effectiveness of tuning of the electronic band structure (i.e., upward band bending) in heterojunction-based PEC devices of TiO 2 /BTO core/shell nanowire (NW) arrays as photoanodes [117].However, the contribution of the ferroelectric polarization effect plays a predominant role, which is evidenced by numerous different measurements such as the PE hysteresis loop, dynamic contact electrostatic force microscopy (DC-EFM) characterization, and electric poling by different directions.As a result, the positive polarization switched by external electric field poling at the TiO 2 /BTO (5 nm of thickness) interface yielded an optimal photocurrent density of water oxidation (1.30 mA/cm 2 ) that was 67% higher than that of a photoanode without BTO (0.78 mA/cm 2 ).This result hints at the tremendous potential of ferroelectric photoelectrodes in enhancing PEC performance.
(2) BiVO 4 Bismuth vanadate (BiVO 4 ) is an n-type semiconductor (bandgap value ~2.5 eV), which has been widely applied as a photoanode material in PEC cells because of its large absorbance range in the visible spectrum along with a suitable conduction band structure [118,119].Based on its bandgap energy, BiVO 4 is able to generate a photocurrent density of ~7.5 mA/cm 2 and a theoretical solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of 9.2% under AM 1.5 G conditions [120,121].However, BiVO 4 suffers from poor surface catalytic reactivity and substantial recombination losses, which prevent it from achieving the theoretical maximum.With the aim of addressing these drawbacks, many strategies such as doping, morphology control, and the construction of heterojunction structures have been investigated in PEC devices containing BiVO 4 photoelectrodes.
Choi et al. [122] prepared nanoporous BiVO 4 photoanodes with dual-layer oxygen evolution catalysts (OEC), which is reported to alleviate bulk carrier recombination at the BiVO 4 /OEC junction by creating a more favorable Helmholtz layer potential drop at the OEC/electrolyte junction.PEC devices containing BiVO 4 /FeOOH/NiOOH photoanodes have been shown to yield a photocurrent density of 2.73 mA/cm 2 at a potential as low as 0.6 V versus RHE without any extrinsic doping and composition tuning.Subsequently, this author's group performed further mild annealing treatment of nanoporous BiVO 4 under N 2 flow that produced nitrogen doping and the generation of oxygen vacancies [123].This is attributed to the enhanced major carrier density as well as the major carrier mobility of BiVO 4 .The photocurrrent was drastically improved to 4.16 ± 0.41 mA/cm 2 , and the NiOOH/FeOOH/N-BiVO 4 photoanode manifested an applied biased photo-to-current efficiency (ABPE) of 2.0% under a bias of 0.6 V.In further investigations of the same BiVO 4 /Fe(Ni)OOH tandem structure, further enhancement of the photocurrent density up to 5.82 ± 0.36 mA/cm 2 at 1.23 V versus RHE was achieved by Mo-doping with a concentration of 3% on a nanocone FTO/BiVO 4 substrate [124].
In other studies [125][126][127][128], because WO 3 has well-known properties such as its low cost, high chemical stability, and good charge transport activity, BiVO 4 was coupled with this material to overcome the moderate charge transport feature of PEC cells fabricated from pure BiVO 4 to produce PEC cells with robust performance.Nevertheless, these studies at potentials as low as 0.6 V versus RHE still demonstrate charge separation efficiencies of less than 60%.
Kuang et al. [129] reported on a non-doped nanostructured BiVO 4 photoanode with a bimetallic NiFe-(oxy)hydroxide/borate(NiFeO x -B i ) oxygen evolution catalyst as an efficient oxidation co-catalyst to achieve a solar energy conversion efficiency in excess of 2%.More importantly, a very high of incident photo-to-current efficiency (IPCE) of approximately 80% was achieved at a potential as low as 0.6 V versus RHE under front irradiation up to 460 nm, which is nearly twice of that of a previous nanoporous BiVO 4 electrode [122] without compromising other beneficial properties.Recently, Lee et al. [130] fabricated epitaxial BiVO 4 on a thin γ-WO 3 template layer deposited on a SrTiO 3 (001) substrate by pulsed laser deposition (PLD).
Although PLD was applied in the fabrication of a BiVO 4 photoanode electrode in PEC cells for the first time by Liu and Yan [131] in the last decade, it drew less attention at the time because of its very low photocurrent values, regardless of the high-quality films.However, the effect of the thin γ-WO 3 template layer on the effective charge transfer and increased active surface area of BiVO 4 accounted for the significantly enhanced photocurrent density (2.20 mA/cm 2 ) at 1.23 V versus RHE, which is approximately 10 times higher than that of bare BiVO 4 .This study highlighted that PLD combined with suitable BiVO 4 photoanode materials is a facile and versatile technique for producing good-quality electrodes for PEC water splitting.
(3) SrTiO 3 Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) was the first oxide used as a photoanode material for PEC water splitting and was discovered by Fujishima-Honda [13].Until now, it has been one of the most attractive materials for PEC cells.However, TiO 2 absorbs only in the UV part of the spectrum because of its large bandgap [132], which exhibits low efficiency in water-splitting reactions when TiO 2 is used as a single photoanode [133][134][135][136].
SrTiO 3 (STO) is a perovskite oxide that shows considerable ferroelectricity [137,138] and possesses a favorable band edge structure that overlaps with the water redox potentials.In addition, the conduction band edge is more negative than TiO 2 , as presented in Figure 9 [139].Similar to TiO 2 , STO responds only to the UV region and a negligible portion of the visible light.This has prevented it from being a good single photoanode candidate for PEC cells.As a result, STO has been doped with dopants, or coupled with TiO 2 , which the aim of shifting the Fermi level of the dual-phase STO/TiO 2 composite [87], for application as a potential candidate for improving photoconversion efficiency.
Limited reports have focused on TO thin films with dopants such as (Cr, Rh, Ir, and Nb) [140][141][142][143][144].However, a few of these studies have reported some drawbacks such as non-uniform doping and the insignificant effect of such dopants, or even the resulting instability because of the formation of IrO 2 [145].Recently, further investigation into STO/TiO 2 photoanode materials has revealed some desirable outcomes [87,139,[145][146][147][148].Wysmulek et al. [136] studied a durable eutectic system made up of TiO 2 and STO as an active photoanode material for PEC cells.Under 600 mW/cm 2 of solar irradiation, the TiO 2 /STO eutectic photoelectrode yielded a photocurrent density of up to 8.5 mA/cm 2 at 1.5 V versus NHE and stabilized after 30 h of testing.This result not only shows an improvement in the photocurrent density, it also showed a better long-term operation compared with Ir-doped STO (24 h) [145].Thus, eutectic composite-based photoelectrodes are untapped components for PEC water splitting.In addition, the spontaneous electric polarization in STO can simultaneously enhance charge separation and hole transportation in TiO 2 /STO core-shell nanowires (NWs) [146].Compared to the TiO 2 /BaTiO 3 ferroelectric PEC system [138], STO ferroelectric material shows better charge mobility, which will facilitate hole migration inside the ferroelectric layer.Interestingly, the core shell with an optimal STO thickness of 10 nm generates the highest photocurrent density of 1.43 mA/cm 2 and has the charge-separation efficiency of 87.7% at 1.23 V versus RHE.This corresponds to an 83% and 79% improvement in comparison with pristine TiO 2 NWs.This study has paved the way for the application of semiconducting ferroelectric materials to further advance the development of ferroelectric PEC systems.(4) BiFeO3 The BiFeO3 (BFO) ferroelectric material shows unique photovoltaic effects that result from large spontaneous polarization.This prominent characteristic develops a high built-in potential that effectively enhances the separation and drift of photogenerated carriers for application in PEC devices composed of BFO-containing photoelectrodes.In comparison with photocathodic materials, there are few reports regarding the application of BFO as photoanodic materials in PEC water splitting.
Very recently, Song et al. [4] reported on epitaxial BFO thin-film photoanodes with different crystallographic orientations including (111)pc, (110)pc, (001)pc, and the consequence of the ferroelectric domain structures was also investigated.To investigate the difference among various crystallographic orientations on ferroelectric properties and the effect of different polarization states on photovoltaic performance, ferroelectric P-E hysteresis loop and polarization switching measurements were performed, respectively, as shown in Figure 10.The results revealed that in the absence of polarization, the charge energy band bending, which induces inefficient charge separation, was not observed.In contrast, an optimal PEC performance with (111)pc BFO thin film under a downward polarization state was revealed.Previously, enhanced efficiency in a polycrystalline BFO photoanode also exhibited a similar mechanism when switching the polling bias from +8 V to −8 V [149].This BFO thin film was based on the cost-effective technology of spin coating, instead of growing epitaxial BFO thin film using more sophisticated techniques including radio frequency (RF) and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [150,151].However, this limits their application in large-scale technology.The BiFeO 3 (BFO) ferroelectric material shows unique photovoltaic effects that result from large spontaneous polarization.This prominent characteristic develops a high built-in potential that effectively enhances the separation and drift of photogenerated carriers for application in PEC devices composed of BFO-containing photoelectrodes.In comparison with photocathodic materials, there are few reports regarding the application of BFO as photoanodic materials in PEC water splitting.
Very recently, Song et al. [4] reported on epitaxial BFO thin-film photoanodes with different crystallographic orientations including (111) pc , (110) pc , (001) pc , and the consequence of the ferroelectric domain structures was also investigated.To investigate the difference among various crystallographic orientations on ferroelectric properties and the effect of different polarization states on photovoltaic performance, ferroelectric P-E hysteresis loop and polarization switching measurements were performed, respectively, as shown in Figure 10.The results revealed that in the absence of polarization, the charge energy band bending, which induces inefficient charge separation, was not observed.In contrast, an optimal PEC performance with (111) pc BFO thin film under a downward polarization state was revealed.Previously, enhanced efficiency in a polycrystalline BFO photoanode also exhibited a similar mechanism when switching the polling bias from +8 V to −8 V [149].This BFO thin film was based on the cost-effective technology of spin coating, instead of growing epitaxial BFO thin film using more sophisticated techniques including radio frequency (RF) and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [150,151].However, this limits their application in large-scale technology.(

5) PbTiO3
Although a large number of studies have been performed based on PbTiO3-containing materials as photocathodes in PEC cells for hydrogen production, photoanodes composed of PbTiO3 (PTO) are increasingly of concern.Specifically, there are numerous reports on nanostructured PTO because of their superior PEC properties, which are related to their randomly shaped particles [152,153].Moreover, many useful approaches based on heterojunctions from different semiconductors have resulted in improved photoactivity [127,[154][155][156][157][158].
Based on these two interpretations, Jang et al.
[159] synthesized vertically aligned core-shell PTO@TiO2 heterojunction nanotube arrays fabricated on FTO glass by a three-step process that can help suppress the opaque photoanode problem reported in a previous study [91].As expected, the directional charge transport in one-dimensional (1D) nanostructure and additional heterojunction effects between PTO and TiO2 favor charge separation and enhanced PEC efficiency in PTO@TiO2 photoanode-based systems.Recently, there was a report on the synthesis of nanotubular PTO-based photoanodes in PEC devices for the first time [160].The investigation was performed with two synthetic electrodes of 1D nanotube arrays of PTO (NT-PTO) and Pt-dots@PTO nanotube arrays (PNT-PTO) in comparison with two reference electrodes made of PTO nanotubes (no Pt dots) and PTO powder (no nanotubes).The result presents that the NT-PTO photoanode achieved the highest photocurrent density of 64 µ A/cm 2 at 1.05 V versus RHE.In comparison, the PTO powder-based photoelectrode exhibited a meager value of 8 µ A/cm 2 at the same RHE potential.The enhanced PEC performance was elucidated by reducing the electron-hole recombination through the isolated oxidation sites at the external surface of the Pt-dots@PTO nanotubular structure.

Ferroelectric Chalcogenides (1) CdS
Cadmium sulfide (CdS) is the most common ferroelectric chalcogenide investigated in PEC water splitting because of its narrow energy bandgap of 2.4 eV and suitable band edge position [157,158].Despite these advantages, the CdS-based PEC devices showed a low performance because of inefficient charge transfer and separation [161][162][163][164][165].
Uniform carbon-coated CdS core-shell nanostructures are potentially useful as a facile and novel approach to overcome this challenge [166].The enhanced performance is elucidated by the substantially improved electron transfer, which results from the high electrical conductivity of the coated carbon layer on CdS.CdS widely couples with ZnO nanowires and nanorods as an ideal (5) PbTiO 3 Although a large number of studies have been performed based on PbTiO 3 -containing materials as photocathodes in PEC cells for hydrogen production, photoanodes composed of PbTiO 3 (PTO) are increasingly of concern.Specifically, there are numerous reports on nanostructured PTO because of their superior PEC properties, which are related to their randomly shaped particles [152,153].Moreover, many useful approaches based on heterojunctions from different semiconductors have resulted in improved photoactivity [127,[154][155][156][157][158].
Based on these two interpretations, Jang et al.
[159] synthesized vertically aligned core-shell PTO@TiO 2 heterojunction nanotube arrays fabricated on FTO glass by a three-step process that can help suppress the opaque photoanode problem reported in a previous study [91].As expected, the directional charge transport in one-dimensional (1D) nanostructure and additional heterojunction effects between PTO and TiO 2 favor charge separation and enhanced PEC efficiency in PTO@TiO 2 photoanode-based systems.Recently, there was a report on the synthesis of nanotubular PTO-based photoanodes in PEC devices for the first time [160].The investigation was performed with two synthetic electrodes of 1D nanotube arrays of PTO (NT-PTO) and Pt-dots@PTO nanotube arrays (PNT-PTO) in comparison with two reference electrodes made of PTO nanotubes (no Pt dots) and PTO powder (no nanotubes).The result presents that the NT-PTO photoanode achieved the highest photocurrent density of 64 µA/cm 2 at 1.05 V versus RHE.In comparison, the PTO powder-based photoelectrode exhibited a meager value of 8 µA/cm 2 at the same RHE potential.The enhanced PEC performance was elucidated by reducing the electron-hole recombination through the isolated oxidation sites at the external surface of the Pt-dots@PTO nanotubular structure.

Ferroelectric Chalcogenides (1) CdS
Cadmium sulfide (CdS) is the most common ferroelectric chalcogenide investigated in PEC water splitting because of its narrow energy bandgap of 2.4 eV and suitable band edge position [157,158].Despite these advantages, the CdS-based PEC devices showed a low performance because of inefficient charge transfer and separation [161][162][163][164][165].
Uniform carbon-coated CdS core-shell nanostructures are potentially useful as a facile and novel approach to overcome this challenge [166].The enhanced performance is elucidated by the substantially improved electron transfer, which results from the high electrical conductivity of the coated carbon layer on CdS.CdS widely couples with ZnO nanowires and nanorods as an ideal heterostructure in PEC devices that helps to suppress internal charge recombination and enhance solar-to-chemical conversion [167][168][169].Accordingly, the development of ZnO/CdS nanotube arrays outperforms the previous structures with a larger specific surface, which results in a superior ability for charge extraction, especially in the case of nanoparticle plasmon metal addition [170,171].
Besides the common nanostructured CdS, a rare report on the versatile hierarchical structure of CdS film was investigated recently [172].Zang et al. [173] grew screw-like SnO 2 nanosheets on rod-like single-crystalline SnO 2 nanowires deposited with CdS quantum dots in PEC cells that tend to move toward efficient PEC water splitting.This structure is a combination of both the fast charge transport path of 1D nanostructures and the high porosity and light absorption of 2D nanosheets, which will extend the perspective of high-performance PEC cells in the near future.
(2) ZnS Zinc sulfide (ZnS) is regarded as one of the most important II-VI semiconductors, and is an appealing candidate for water splitting because of its own outstanding properties, which include an ability to generate mobile photoexcited charge carriers [174], fast electron transfer because of high CB potential, and high catalytic activity for H 2 generation under conditions without a co-catalyst [175,176].However, the performance of pure ZnS-based photoelectrode in water-splitting devices is limited, because absorption is only in the UV region due to the wide bandgap value of 3.66 eV of this material [177].Furthermore, overcoming the high charge recombination is also a serious challenge [178,179].
As a result, many modifications have been investigated for ZnS-based electrodes to increase visible light absorption.To enhance photocatalytic activity, transition metal-doped ZnS (Cu, Ni, Mo) or doping with GaN were investigated as potentially efficient photocatalysts to generate H 2 under visible light irradiation [180][181][182].However, due to the remaining challenges of dopant introduction [181,[183][184][185][186] an alternative method by controlling defects in nanostructured ZnS has been exploited through PLD to enhance the overall PEC properties of ZnS [187].The fabrication of ZnS-based heterojunctions with other semiconductors for more advanced designs has been considered to enhance PEC performance for water splitting.
Typically, the ZnO/ZnS heterostructure has drawn tremendous attention because of the extended visible absorption that it affords and its appropriate alignment [188][189][190][191][192].Among ZnO/ZnS heterostructures with different morphologies such as nanowires [193] and nanorings [194] synthesized by means of chemical processes, the PEC behavior is scarcely introduced by anodization, which facilitates electron-hole separation, and consequently, the enhancement of photoelectrochemical activity for water splitting [195].Moreover, the design of sandwich-structured ZnO/ZnS photoanodes with a third component, such as noble metals Au or graphite-like carbon nitride (C 3 N 4 ), have been demonstrated with significantly superior PEC activity compared to those of a pristine ZnO photoanode [196,197].Nevertheless, the remaining challenge is the wide bandgap of the ZnO/ZnS heterojunction, which still limits large-range visible light absorption.The systems that result from coupling ZnS with narrow bandgap chalcogenide CdS exhibit much higher performance than those of every single material-based system [198][199][200][201][202]  Tandem cell configuration is a facile and novel approach to address the limitation of single or heterojunction PEC devices for water splitting.Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 has attracted tremendous attention in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) because of their superb light-harvesting characteristics, large electron/hole diffusion lengths, and high crystallinity [203][204][205][206][207]. Based on the latest research, the certified highest efficiency of PSCs is 22.1% fabricated on limited to very small areas (~1 cm 2 ) [208].Ferroelectric domains have been observed in CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 , despite the centrosymmetric structure of this perovskite material, which is ascribed to the reduced symmetry of molecular CH 3 NH 3 + dipoles [209,210].
Recently, Luo et al. [211] demonstrated two perovskite solar cells connected in series as a tandem cell that can serve as a separated and external power supply for water splitting, as presented in Figure 11.Although this device can achieve a high photocurrent density of ~10 mA/cm 2 , the electrodes were not directly settled in the photoreactions.Moreover, the rapid fluctuation of the photocurrent due to the instability of the perovskite was a challenge that could be addressed by encapsulation techniques to achieve intriguing PEC tandem systems.More recently, Da et al. reported on a CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 -based photoanode coated by an ultrathin Ni layer for the first time with a much enhanced photocurrent density of 12 mA/cm 2 , which is attributed to the improved photoabsorption of CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 [212].
In their report, a Ni top layer played a decisive role in the enhancement of the photocurrent density and assisted in the suppression of the instability of perovskite PEC tandem systems in water; this evokes many promising perspectives in the development of hybrid perovskite-based tandem cells.

Conclusions and Outlook
Interest in solar water splitting is on the rise, which is in line with a general trend of increasing environmental awareness.Based on state-of-the-art reports, amazing progress in solar water splitting has been demonstrated, including the upgrade of systems, and the development of new electrode materials and their structure.To perform high-efficiency solar water splitting, the materials used in the different systems have to satisfy three conditions.They should have: an appropriate bandgap energy, a suitable position of the bandgap, and chemical stability.The ideal material has a bandgap of approximately ~2.0-2.2 eV, which can absorb about 40% of the total incident sunlight.The conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) of the materials should be higher-between the water reduction level and below the oxidation level of water-in order to induce the water decomposition reaction.At present, no materials have been identified that meet all of the requirements for water decomposition reactions.
In this review, we introduced various ferroelectric materials for solar water splitting with high STH efficiency.Ferroelectric materials have been known to be very stable and strong for chemical and physical applications, and their bandgap could be narrowed by doping and/or substitution.Even though solar water splitting systems with ferroelectric materials are the newest technology and have attracted important new research into hydrogen generation, until now, there has not yet been much research performed on ferroelectric materials for use in water-splitting systems.Solar water-splitting systems with ferroelectrics are expected as significant advances in the process of hydrogen generation, with high STH efficiencies compared to other materials.

Conclusions and Outlook
Interest in solar water splitting is on the rise, which is in line with a general trend of increasing environmental awareness.Based on state-of-the-art reports, amazing progress in solar water splitting has been demonstrated, including the upgrade of systems, and the development of new electrode materials and their structure.To perform high-efficiency solar water splitting, the materials used in the different systems have to satisfy three conditions.They should have: an appropriate bandgap energy, a suitable position of the bandgap, and chemical stability.The ideal material has a bandgap of approximately ~2.0-2.2 eV, which can absorb about 40% of the total incident sunlight.The conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) of the materials should be higher-between the water reduction level and below the oxidation level of water-in order to induce the water decomposition reaction.At present, no materials have been identified that meet all of the requirements for water decomposition reactions.
In this review, we introduced various ferroelectric materials for solar water splitting with high STH efficiency.Ferroelectric materials have been known to be very stable and strong for chemical and physical applications, and their bandgap could be narrowed by doping and/or substitution.Even though solar water splitting systems with ferroelectric materials are the newest technology and have attracted important new research into hydrogen generation, until now, there has not

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The bandgap of various materials including ferroelectrics and the semiconductor.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The bandgap of various materials including ferroelectrics and the semiconductor.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The bandgap of various materials including ferroelectrics and the semiconductor.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. (a) Energy band diagram of Cu 2 O and SrTiO 3 before and after formation of the p-n junction, (b) Photocurrent density vs. applied potential curve for (A) pristine Cu 2 O and (C) 343 nm of Cu 2 O/SrTiO 3 heterojunction [88].Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.(a) Variations of the current density with applied voltage and (b) Simplified energy band diagrams of the PEC cell based on Bi2FeCrO6 (BFCO) thin film without polarization (left) and either negatively poled (middle) or positively poled (right) [105].Copyright 2015, Wiley Online Library.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.(a) Variations of the current density with applied voltage and (b) Simplified energy band diagrams of the PEC cell based on Bi 2 FeCrO 6 (BFCO) thin film without polarization (left) and either negatively poled (middle) or positively poled (right) [105].Copyright 2015, Wiley Online Library.

29 Figure 9 .
Figure 9. SrTiO3-TiO2 eutectic composite-based PEC cell.(a) A simplified PEC cell employing a eutectic system as the photoactive anode material.(b) Charge-carrier separation mechanism at the phase boundary, with bandgap positions and values with respect to electrochemical potential (E) vs. NHE based on [139,147,148].Figure 9 [139] from Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. SrTiO 3 -TiO 2 eutectic composite-based PEC cell.(a) A simplified PEC cell employing a eutectic system as the photoactive anode material.(b) Charge-carrier separation mechanism at the phase boundary, with bandgap positions and values with respect to electrochemical potential (E) vs. NHE based on [139,147,148].Figure 9 [139] from Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

Figure 9 [
Figure 9. SrTiO 3 -TiO 2 eutectic composite-based PEC cell.(a) A simplified PEC cell employing a eutectic system as the photoactive anode material.(b) Charge-carrier separation mechanism at the phase boundary, with bandgap positions and values with respect to electrochemical potential (E) vs. NHE based on [139,147,148].Figure 9 [139] from Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

4. 3 . 3 .
Hybrid Halide Ferroelectric CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 Perovskite Tandem System Approach Appl.Sci.2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 19 of 29Although this device can achieve a high photocurrent density of ~10 mA/cm 2 , the electrodes were not directly settled in the photoreactions.Moreover, the rapid fluctuation of the photocurrent due to the instability of the perovskite was a challenge that could be addressed by encapsulation techniques to achieve intriguing PEC tandem systems.More recently, Da et al. reported on a CH3NH3PbI3-based photoanode coated by an ultrathin Ni layer for the first time with a much enhanced photocurrent density of 12 mA/cm 2 , which is attributed to the improved photoabsorption of CH3NH3PbI3[212].In their report, a Ni top layer played a decisive role in the enhancement of the photocurrent density and assisted in the suppression of the instability of perovskite PEC tandem systems in water; this evokes many promising perspectives in the development of hybrid perovskite-based tandem cells.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Combination of the perovskite tandem cell with NiFe DLH/Ni foam electrodes for water splitting, (a) Schematic diagram of the water-splitting device, (b) A generalized energy schematic of the perovskite tandem cell for water splitting [211].Copyright from 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Author
Contributions: C.W.B. had the main idea for the article.S.K., N.T.N. performed the literature search and the writing of the manuscript in consultation with C.W.B.All authors discussed the concept of review and commented on the manuscript.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Combination of the perovskite tandem cell with NiFe DLH/Ni foam electrodes for water splitting, (a) Schematic diagram of the water-splitting device, (b) A generalized energy schematic of the perovskite tandem cell for water splitting [211].Copyright from 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.