Facile Synthetic Route of a Solution-Processable , Thieno [ 3 , 4c ] pyrrolo-4 , 6-dione-Based Conjugated Small Molecule and Control of the Optoelectronic Properties via Processing Additives

In this study, a new type of low-bandgap small molecule has been synthesized with a thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione (TPD) derivative for application in bulk heterojunction (BJH) solar cells. The series of solar cells were fabricated by blending the TPD-based small molecule (M1) and [6,6]-phenyl C71 butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM). In order to optimize the performance of solar cells, the nanoscale morphologies of the BHJ layers were controlled via processing additives with 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO) and 1-chloronaphthalene (CN). Therefore, we demonstrated that the use of CN successively suppressed molecular aggregation and demonstrated suitable phase separation, in addition to increasing the power conversion efficiency from 0.36% to 1.86%.


Introduction
Solution-processed organic solar cells have been studied due to the social demand of low-cost, lightweight, flexible, and printable devices in large scale [1][2][3][4][5].Significant progress of organic solar cells has been demonstrated by utilizing a bulk heterojunction (BHJ) strategy consisting of narrow-bandgap conjugated polymers as p-type semiconductors and fullerene derivatives as n-type semiconductors, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] leading to desirable, nanoscale phase separation of the two organic components and the achievement of a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) [14][15][16][17].In order to optimize such a BHJ solar cell system, many efforts have been mainly focused on developing novel, p-type conjugated polymers because of their unique light-harvesting properties, good film formation, and extended electron delocalization through their backbone structures synthesized by alternative copolymerization with electron donor (D) and acceptor (A) units, which can lead to good charge carrier mobilities and narrow energy band gaps [18][19][20][21][22][23][24].However, the intrinsically broad polydispersity of their molecular weights often limit their purification, reproducibility of performance, and cause significant batch-to-batch variation of the performance in functioning devices [25].
However, most of them showed low PCEs because it is still difficult to obtain the desirable phase separation morphologies of those two organic components.Therefore, there is a high demand for the discovery of more applicable molecular structures to the BHJ systems and thus, the design and synthesis of appropriate molecules for efficient performance still merits extensive research [25,26].Recently, extended D-A structures such as D-A-D-A-D-type conjugated small molecules have been considered as the most successful alternatives to polymers for BHJ solar cells, comprising nearly 10% of PCEs since the choice of D and A units and conjugated length of the framework can tailor thermal properties, optical properties, and ordered self-assemblies in their solid states [46][47][48][49][50][51].
Each TPD unit has a relatively strong electron-withdrawing property which can lower the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level of the polymeric materials against the vacuum level and then, increase open circuit voltage (V oc ) in BHJ solar cells when it is fabricated with phenyl-C 61 or C 70 -butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) derivatives [57][58][59].Recent reports of BHJ solar cells employing TPD-based polymers have achieved PCEs up to 8.5% [17].However, TPD-based molecules have yet to be extensively investigated as materials for small molecule(SM)-BHJ solar cells.In 2012, Lin et al. reported a series of TPD(A)-based p-type organic semiconductors conjugated with triphenylamine (D) showing D-A-D structures that exhibited a PCE of 3.3% from functioning BHJ solar cell systems [60].
Even though the D-A-D structures with TPD units showed quite successful performances, we believe that a D-A-D-A-D strategy can provide more structural diversity than a D-A-D strategy.Therefore, in this work, we prepared a new TPD-based small molecule bearing the D-A-D-A-D framework consisting of electron-donating bithiophene and electron-accepting TPD units.The thermal, optical, and electrochemical properties of the molecule were characterized, and the photovoltaic performances of devices fabricated under different conditions were also evaluated.

Synthesis and Characterization
In a 250 mL flame-dried round bottom flask equipped with a cooling condenser, 3.44 g (20 mmol) of thiophene dicarboxylic acid was mixed with 100 mL of acetic anhydride.The mixture was stirred vigorously at 140 • C for 16 h (overnight).The temperature was then decreased to 75 • C and unreacted acetic anhydride was distilled off under a reduced pressure.The remaining crude, dark-brown solid was carried through to the next synthetic step without further purification.Then, 100 mL of toluene was added to the flask and 3.88 g (30 mmol) of 2-ethyl-1-hexylamine was added dropwise.The mixture was stirred at 120 • C for 20 h (overnight).After being cooled down to room temperature, the solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator (EYELA, Tokyo, Japan).For the next step, 30 mL of thionyl chloride was added to the crude solid.The mixture was stirred at 75 • C for 3 h.After being cooled to room temperature, the solution was slowly pipetted into 300 mL of water, causing precipitation of a brown solid.The crude solid was recovered by filtration and washed with water.Next, the product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using a dichloromethane/hexane gradient.Finally, the product was collected and dried, resulting in a white solid.Overall yield: 4.  [3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione (6) In a 250-mL flame-dried round bottom flask, 4.4 g (16.58 mmol) of 5-(2-ethylhexyl)-thieno [3,4c]pyrrole-4,6-dione was dissolved with 50 mL of trifluoroacetic acid and 15 mL of sulfuric acid.When the mixture became a clear solution, 8.85 g (50 mmol) of N-bromosuccinimide was added in small portions.The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature.The brownish red solution was diluted with water (100 mL) and the organic components were extracted with dichloromethane and washed with water three times.The organic phase was then dried over magnesium sulfate, followed by the removal of solids by filtration.After removing the volatile solvent under reduced pressure, purification was accomplished by silica gel column chromatography using dichloromethane and hexane (1:2) mixture as the eluent, resulting in a white solid.Recovered yield: 5.7 g (13.47 mmol, 81%).1H-NMR (400 MHz, chloroform-d, δ): 3.51 (t, 2H, CH2), 1.81-1.77(m, 1H, CH), 1.38-1.21(br m, 8H, CH2), and 0.94-0.87(br m, 6H, CH3).HRMS (EI) m/z, calculated for C14H17Br2NO2S (M+): 420; found: 420.
In a 250-mL flame-dried three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a water condenser, 2.0 g (4.8 mmol) of 1 was mixed with 30 mL of ethanol, 10 mL of acetic acid, and three drops of hydrochloric acid (1N), and this mixture was heated to 60 • C until a homogeneous solution was obtained.Then, 320 mg (4.8 mmol) of zinc dust was added and the mixture was stirred at 80 • C for 3 h.After being cooled down to room temperature, the solid residue was recovered by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under reduced pressure, resulting in a crude yellow solid.Next, the crude product was dissolved in diethyl ether and washed two times with water and one time with a saturated, aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate.The organic phase was then separated and dried over magnesium sulfate.Purification was accomplished by silica gel column chromatography using a dichloromethane/hexane gradient.Finally, the collected portion was dried by evaporation, resulting in a white solid.Recovered yield: 830 mg (2.4 mmol, 50%).1H-NMR (400 MHz, chloroform-d, δ): 7.67 (s, 1H, CH), 3.51 (t, 2H, CH2), 1.81-1.77(m, 1H, CH), 1.38-1.21(br m, 8H, CH2), and 0.94-0.87(br m, 6H, CH3).HRMS (EI) m/z, calculated for C14H18BrNO2S (M+): 343; found: 343.2.2.4.5,5'-Bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)-thieno [3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione)-2,2'-bithiophene (8) A 20-mL Biotage microwave vial was charged with 2 (282.3 mg, 0.82 mmol), 5,5'-bis(tributylstannyl)-2,2'-bithiophene (297.7 mg, 0.4 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (46 mg, 0.04 mmol), and toluene (12 mL).The vial was then sealed with a Teflon cap under a nitrogen atmosphere and placed in a Biotage microwave reactor (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden).Next, the reaction mixture was heated to 170 • C for 1 h.Once cooled, the mixture was poured into 200 mL of methanol and the precipitate formed was filtered and dissolved in a small amount of dichloromethane.The solution was loaded onto silica gel and purified by flash chromatography using a dichloromethane/hexane gradient.Finally, the fraction was collected and dried, resulting in a red solid.Recovered yield: 200 mg (72%).7.04 mg, 8 mol %), cesium carbonate (162.9 mg, 0.5 mmol), and tetrahydrofuran (2 mL).The vial was then sealed with a Teflon cap under nitrogen atmosphere and placed in an oil bath.Next, the reaction mixture was heated to 120 • C for 24 h with vigorous stirring.Once cooled, the mixture was poured into 200 mL of methanol and the precipitate was filtered and loaded onto silica gel for purification by flash chromatography using a dichloromethane/hexane gradient.Finally, the fraction was collected and dried, resulting in a dark purple solid.Recovered yield: 152 mg (51%

Solar Cell Fabrication and Characterization
In this work, solar cells were fabricated with the following device architecture: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/ M1:PC71BM/Al.Prior to use, ITO substrates were cleaned by sonication separately in soapy water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol; dried in an oven (Wisd, Dublin, Ireland); then subjected to ultraviolet (UV)/ozone treatment.A 40 nm thick poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) layer was spun cast from aqueous solution (5000 rpm for 40 s).The substrates were then dried at 140 • C for 10 min in air and transferred to a N2-glovebox for spin-casting of the active layers.Solar cells were fabricated using M1 as the donor and [6,6]-phenyl C71 butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) as the acceptor.Solutions of M1:PC71BM with different ratios (30:70, 40:60, 50:50, 60:40, and 70:30 w/v) in chloroform, and solutions with an optimized blend ratio (40:60 w/v) in chlorobenzene with or without additives were spun cast onto the substrates.The final step in device construction involved the thermal evaporation of the 100 nm thick Al electrodes.All data were obtained under AM 1.5 G illumination from a calibrated solar simulator with an irradiation intensity of 100 mW/cm 2 under an ambient atmosphere.For each case, five devices were fabricated and each device had two electrodes on top.

Molecular Design and Synthesis
Scheme 1 shows the chemical structure of the target molecule (M1) and Scheme 2a depicts synthetic strategy for M1 by showing several steps of the retrosynthesis.Since bithiophene derivatives such as 1 and 3 in Scheme 2a are commercially available, it would be convenient that based on bithiophene derivatives, the other groups were retrosynthetically analyzed first and then, since each molecule could be coupled by two types of well-established reaction depending on the type of bithiophene derivatives, as shown in Scheme 1a, we believed that the analysis was correct and feasible.Further retrosynthetic analysis was focused on the other side group containing TPD units such as 2 and 4 as described in Scheme 2b.Since the hexyl bithiophene derivative notated as 5 is also commercially available, the 2 and 4 can be retrosynthetically analyzed by two parts such as TPD derivatives and 5, as shown in Scheme 2b.From this aspect, it was found that the mono-brominated TPD (7 in Scheme 2b) and bis-brominated TPD (6 in Scheme 2b) formed the possible starting point for the desired M1 molecule.Therefore, 1,3-dibromo-5-(2-ethylhexyl)-thieno [3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione (6) was prepared with a yield of 65% by following the literature, as shown in Scheme 3a [53].Then, one of the bromine substituents on 6 was reduced with zinc (0) so as to afford 7 with a yield of 56%, see Scheme 3a.Then, 2 was synthesized upon varying the stoichiometric ratio of 6 and 5 via a Stille cross-coupling reaction as shown in Scheme 3b.However, most of the resulting product was insoluble polymeric solid, resulting in a yield of 2 of only 7% even though an excess amount of 6 was used.Therefore, it was found that this type of reaction was not an atom economically favorable method to get 2 especially.Nonetheless, a quite reasonable amount of 4 was obtained via direct heteroallylation with a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of 5 and 7, such as mono-brominated TPD.At this point, we lack insight to explain the side reaction in Scheme 3b via a Stille cross-coupling reaction but it is worthy to note here that TPD derivatives seem to be more suitable and stable for the direct heteroallylation condition.After 4 was obtained, several trials were attempted to obtain 2 by brominating 4 with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), as displayed in Scheme 3c.However, Fragment 2 was not obtained from any of the trials.Notably, too many spots were detected on thin layer chromatography (TLC) substrates when the bromination was processed in the acidic condition where the TPD units were brominated.Therefore, further analysis of resulting compounds from such an acidic condition was almost impossible and we concluded that the starting materials, such as 4, could be decomposed in such acidic conditions.In relatively mild conditions, almost all starting materials remained intact for 12 h without showing any significant conversion to brominated compounds based on TLC analysis.brominating 4 with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), as displayed in Scheme 3c.However, Fragment 2 was not obtained from any of the trials.Notably, too many spots were detected on thin layer chromatography (TLC) substrates when the bromination was processed in the acidic condition where the TPD units were brominated.Therefore, further analysis of resulting compounds from such an acidic condition was almost impossible and we concluded that the starting materials, such as 4, could be decomposed in such acidic conditions.In relatively mild conditions, almost all starting materials remained intact for 12 h without showing any significant conversion to brominated compounds based on TLC analysis.Next, 4 and 3 were coupled to gain the M1 with a 12% yield through direct C-H heteroarylation by modifying some of the methods for TPD-based polymers reported in the literature, as described in Scheme 4 [58,61].Although the reaction conditions such as reaction time and temperature were varied without changing the Pd source and phosphine ligands, the chemical yield from this type of reaction was around 12%; therefore, it was an atom economically unfavorable reaction.Since we believed there should be too many variable factors such as reagents and/or each fragment in Scheme 4 to optimize this type of reaction, it was, therefore, necessary to consider the other possible synthetic route to improve the chemical yield for M1.The alternative synthetic route was performed with specific reaction conditions, as shown in Scheme 5.While the previous synthetic route was designed by retrosynthesizing M1 from the side to the core, in Scheme 5, the synthetic procedure was alternated by expanding the core to side to reach the same target molecule.Initially, the 7 and 1 were coupled with Pd(0) catalyst for 8 that is core unit of M1 and then, the bromo derivatives of hexyl bithiophene (9) was coupled with the 8 as the core unit through the direct heteroanyllation method under conventional reflux conditions for 24 h instead of using a microwave reactor which was previously used.Therefore, since the final product was obtained with a much better yield than the Next, 4 and 3 were coupled to gain the M1 with a 12% yield through direct C-H heteroarylation by modifying some of the methods for TPD-based polymers reported in the literature, as described in Scheme 4 [58,61].Although the reaction conditions such as reaction time and temperature were varied without changing the Pd source and phosphine ligands, the chemical yield from this type of reaction was around 12%; therefore, it was an atom economically unfavorable reaction.Since we believed there should be too many variable factors such as reagents and/or each fragment in Scheme 4 to optimize this type of reaction, it was, therefore, necessary to consider the other possible synthetic route to improve the chemical yield for M1.The alternative synthetic route was performed with specific reaction conditions, as shown in Scheme 5.While the previous synthetic route was designed by retrosynthesizing M1 from the side to the core, in Scheme 5, the synthetic procedure was alternated by expanding the core to side to reach the same target molecule.Initially, the 7 and 1 were coupled with Pd(0) catalyst for 8 that is core unit of M1 and then, the bromo derivatives of hexyl bithiophene (9) was coupled with the 8 as the core unit through the direct heteroanyllation method under conventional reflux conditions for 24 h instead of using a microwave reactor which was previously used.Therefore, since the final product was obtained with a much better yield than the procedure in Scheme 4 and 8 was also obtained with a better yield than 4 (~50%).We believe the alternative synthetic route, Scheme 5, could be a well-optimized synthetic route.Furthermore, to check the possibility to make M1 via a Stille cross-coupling reaction with 8 and 5, the bromination reaction of 8 was attempted, as shown in Scheme 5, but the major brominated product was hexabromo 8 which was not a desired brominated product.Therefore, it is suggested that the total synthetic process of M1 could not be optimized with a Stille cross-coupling reaction by considering all the possible synthetic routes conducted in this study because it was hard to get 2 and the dibrominated 8 at the end of thiophene units.

Optical, Electrochemical and Thermal Properties
UV-vis absorption spectroscopy was used to investigate the optical properties of M1 in both the chloroform solution and the film spin-cast from 10 mg/mL chloroform solution at 1200 rpm for one minute, see Figure 1a.In both solutions and films, M1 exhibits nearly identical absorption maxima at 508 nm.The absorption onset of M1 in the film is red-shifted by approximately 100 nm relative to the onset of M1 from solution and the film also shows two broad vibronic shoulders at 542 nm and 600 nm indicating a strong tendency toward the aggregation of M1 with enhanced intermolecular π-π contacts, corresponding to the increased electronic interaction between chromophores.The optical band gap (1.82 eV) was calculated from the absorption onset at 680 nm of the material in the solid state.

Optical, Electrochemical and Thermal Properties
UV-vis absorption spectroscopy was used to investigate the optical properties of M1 in both the chloroform solution and the film spin-cast from 10 mg/mL chloroform solution at 1200 rpm for one minute, see Figure 1a.In both solutions and films, M1 exhibits nearly identical absorption maxima at 508 nm.The absorption onset of M1 in the film is red-shifted by approximately 100 nm relative to the onset of M1 from solution and the film also shows two broad vibronic shoulders at 542 nm and 600 nm indicating a strong tendency toward the aggregation of M1 with enhanced intermolecular π-π contacts, corresponding to the increased electronic interaction between chromophores.The optical band gap (1.82 eV) was calculated from the absorption onset at 680 nm of the material in the solid state.

Optical, Electrochemical and Thermal Properties
UV-vis absorption spectroscopy was used to investigate the optical properties of M1 in both the chloroform solution and the film spin-cast from 10 mg/mL chloroform solution at 1200 rpm for one minute, see Figure 1a.In both solutions and films, M1 exhibits nearly identical absorption maxima at 508 nm.The absorption onset of M1 in the film is red-shifted by approximately 100 nm relative to the onset of M1 from solution and the film also shows two broad vibronic shoulders at 542 nm and 600 nm indicating a strong tendency toward the aggregation of M1 with enhanced intermolecular π-π contacts, corresponding to the increased electronic interaction between chromophores.The optical band gap (1.82 eV) was calculated from the absorption onset at 680 nm of the material in the solid state.
UV-vis absorption spectroscopy was used to investigate the optical properties of M1 in both the chloroform solution and the film spin-cast from 10 mg/mL chloroform solution at 1200 rpm for one minute, see Figure 1a.In both solutions and films, M1 exhibits nearly identical absorption maxima at 508 nm.The absorption onset of M1 in the film is red-shifted by approximately 100 nm relative to the onset of M1 from solution and the film also shows two broad vibronic shoulders at 542 nm and 600 nm indicating a strong tendency toward the aggregation of M1 with enhanced intermolecular π-π contacts, corresponding to the increased electronic interaction between chromophores.The optical band gap (1.82 eV) was calculated from the absorption onset at 680 nm of the material in the solid state.Furthermore, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy levels of M1 in the solid state were estimated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements conducted on M1 films.Therefore, it was found that a relatively low HOMO level of −5.54 eV against vacuum level and LUMO level of −3.66 eV were obtained, and the estimated electrical band gap (1.88 eV) is in reasonable agreement with the optical band gap (1.82 eV).Hence, the energy levels of M1 in the solid state can be analyzed and the frontier orbital energies of all organic components in functioning organic photovoltaic devices can be illustrated in Figure 1b together with each electrode such as indium tin oxide (ITO) on a glass substrate and aluminum (Al).Based on such an energy diagram, M1 can be well-defined as a p-type semiconductor (electron donor) when it is mixed with PC 70 BM (n-type semiconductor, electron acceptor) for a typical BHJ organic solar cell system.Furthermore, since the HOMO of M1 is quite close to that of PC 70 BM, a large open circuit voltage (V oc ) can be expected and corresponds to the band alignment of LUMO levels between electron donors and acceptors.Efficient electron transfer between M1 and PC 70 BM would also be expected due to the fairly large difference [62].Thermal phase transitions of M1 were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and the results are shown in Figure 1c.The DSC thermogram shows that M1 exhibits a melting transition at 155 • C and crystallizes at 115 • C. Therefore, it could be suggested that M1 has a strong tendency to form ordered aggregates with enhancing π-π stacking in its solid state which can be attributed to the vibronic shoulder peak in its solid-state UV-vis profile [63].

Photovoltaic Properties and Surface Morphologies of Blend Films
We investigated the photovoltaic properties of M1 in BHJ solar cells prepared using different processing conditions.Certain parameters, such as the blend ratio between donor and acceptor, thermal treatment, processing solvent, and the use of additives, were varied.The influence of the M1:PC 71 BM blend ratio on photovoltaic performance is reflected in the current-voltage traces in Figure 2a and the results are summarized in Table 1.The devices were fabricated using the following architecture: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/M1:PC 71 BM/Al.The active layer was deposited by spin coating from 2% solutions in chloroform.Devices cast from chloroform using a M1:PC 71 BM blend ratio of 40:60 showed the best results for power conversion efficiency (PCE) (0.89%) with a short-circuit current (J sc ) of 1.83 mA/cm 2 , open circuit voltage (V oc ) of 0.86 V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.57.By substituting chlorobenzene for chloroform (also 2%solutions with the same M1:PC 71 BM ratio), the PCE improved to 1.23% (J sc = 2.35 mA/cm 2 , V oc = 0.86 V, FF = 61%) [63].The PCE values upon varying the blending ratio are a little higher than some devices fabricated with Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and PC 60 BM in chloroform without post-treatment or processing additives [64].
showed the best results for power conversion efficiency (PCE) (0.89%) with a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 1.83 mA/cm 2 , open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.86 V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.57.By substituting chlorobenzene for chloroform (also 2%solutions with the same M1:PC71BM ratio), the PCE improved to 1.23% (Jsc = 2.35 mA/cm 2 , Voc = 0.86 V, FF = 61%) [63].The PCE values upon varying the blending ratio are a little higher than some devices fabricated with Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and PC60BM in chloroform without post-treatment or processing additives [64].We conducted a dark current analysis to analyze the charge recombination property of our synthesized organic photovoltaic materials in functioning devices, as shown in Figure 2b.From dark current analysis, series resistances were varying from 70 to 940 ohms and shunt resistances were calculated from 0.14 × 10 6 to 4.75 × 10 6 Ω•cm 2 .From the previous research, series and shunt resistors are associated with the recombination confirming that conventional organic solar cells (OSCs) show approximately 8.8 Ω of series resistance and 0.87 kΩ of shunt resistance [65].However, by comparing the conventional resistance values and those from M1-based devices, it can be noticed that the series resistances were 10-100 times higher than the typical OSC device systems.Therefore, we can expect that M1-based devices could have a relatively high recombination and all device characteristics were not optimized yet upon varying the blending ratio.
First, devices fabricated from chlorobenzene solutions represented improved PCEs relative to those obtained from chloroform solutions.Hence, it could be suggested that the solubility of M1 in chlorobenzene would be better than that in chloroform with an enhanced interface area between the D and A phases.Furthermore, the effect of solvent additives diiodooctane (DIO) and chloronaphthalene (CN) on the performances of SM-BHJ solar cells based on M1:PC 71 BM (40:60) active layers cast from 2% chlorobenzene solution were also studied, and these were reported in Figure 3 and Table 2.The PCEs with optimized devices attained for SM-BHJ solar cells in each case were 1.36% (0.2% DIO) and 1.86% (0.5% CN), respectively, due to improved phase-separation between SM-donor and PC 71 BM acceptor.Especially, the solvent additive of CN exhibits much more efficient device performance than the DIO due to the better surface morphology, with reduced aggregation and uneven domains, which induced an increased interface area between D/A based on the atomic force microscopy (AFM) results, as shown in Figure 4.This result can also be attributed to the improved solubility of M1 with CN.

Conclusions
In conclusion, M1, a TPD-based conjugated small molecule with a D-A-D-A-D framework, was synthesized and optimized with a combination of Stille cross-coupling and direct heteroallylation reaction.Some of the fragments for the target molecule showed low reactivity and low stability under the bromination conditions used in this study.Some stannylated or brominated fractions that can be

Conclusions
In conclusion, M1, a TPD-based conjugated small molecule with a D-A-D-A-D framework, was synthesized and optimized with a combination of Stille cross-coupling and direct heteroallylation reaction.Some of the fragments for the target molecule showed low reactivity and low stability under the bromination conditions used in this study.Some stannylated or brominated fractions that can be easily obtained with more than 50% yield or are commercially available were conjugated by a Stille cross-coupling reaction while some fractions that were not simply brominated or stannlyated were coupled with direct allylation with an improved chemical yield.Therefore, we demonstrated the facile synthetic route applicable for various D-A-D-A-D with TPD derivatives.Furthermore, M1 shows strong absorption of visible light with an optical band gap of 1.82 eV in the solid state and clear vibronic shoulders observed in the UV-vis absorption spectra of the M1 film suggesting a strong tendency to form π-π stacking.Together with UV-vis, CV measurements demonstrated the excellent semiconducting properties of M1 for the organic BHJ solar cells by determining HOMO and LUMO energy levels.According to the concept of band alignment, as proven in CV, series of BHJ solar cell devices were fabricated with PC 71 BM upon varying the blend ratio between M1 and PC 71 BM, solvents, and the type of additives so that M1 showed fairly stable p-type semiconducting properties with the highest PCE of 1.86%, V oc of 0.85 eV, J sc of 3.53 mA/cm 2 , and FF of 62% achieved in this study.These moderated PCEs of M1:PC 71 BM BHJ solar cells relative to polymers and other types of small-molecule BHJ solar cells appear to be caused by uneven surface morphologies of M1:PC 71 BM.Therefore, from a broader perspective, this contribution implies that a wider choice of solvents and additives may be pursued to address the challenge in obtaining targeted BHJ morphologies.

Scheme 1 .Scheme 1 . 15 Scheme 2 .Scheme 2 . 15 Scheme 3 .
Scheme 1.The schematic illustration of the target structure for new type of D-A-D-A.D = donor unit; A = acceptor unit.Scheme 1.The schematic illustration of the target structure for new type of D-A-D-A.D = donor unit; A = acceptor unit.Appl.Sci.2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15

Scheme 3 .
Scheme 3. Synthetic routes to (a) 6, 7, (b) 2, and (c) 4. Some of the trials to get 2 from 4 by bromination included in (c) and the synthetic process for 2 in (b) were conducted with a microwave (MW) reactor.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) UV-vis absorption spectra of M1 in the chloroform solution (black line) and of the film cast from the chloroform solution (red line), (b) Energy level diagram of all components in M1:PC 70 BM solar cells and (c) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) profile of M1.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (a) Current-voltage (J-V) characteristics of BHJ solar cells based on M1:PC 71 BM active layers with different blend ratios cast from chloroform and (b) J-V curves in the dark based on the different blending ratio between M1 and PC 71 BM.

Table 1 .
Summary of device parameters for SM-BHJ (small molecule -bulk heterojunction) solar cells based on M1:PC 71 BM active layers cast at different blend ratios from chloroform.All values are averaged from five devices with two electrodes on top of each device and a standard deviation within ±4%. M1:

Table 2 .
Summary of device parameters of SM-BHJ solar cells based on M1:PC71BM active layers (40:60 in chlorobenzene) incorporating different amounts of DIO and CN additives.All values are averaged from five devices with two electrodes on top of each device and a standard deviation within ± 4%. M1:

Table 2 .
Summary of device parameters of SM-BHJ solar cells based on M1:PC 71 BM active layers (40:60 in chlorobenzene) incorporating different amounts of DIO and CN additives.All values are averaged from five devices with two electrodes on top of each device and a standard deviation within ±4%.M1:PC 71 BM (40:60, w/w Ratio in Chlorobenzene) J sc (mA/cm 2 ) V oc (V) FF (%) PCE (%) Appl.Sci.2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 15