Simulation and Evaluation of the Radiation Dose Deposited in Human Tissues by Atmospheric Neutrons

: The evaluation of the radiation dose (RD) deposited by atmospheric neutrons in human tissues is of vital importance due to the potential damages that over exposure to this radiation may cause to human health. The goal of this work was to obtain the RD that atmospheric neutrons with energy from 1 to 1000 MeV deposit in tissues of the human body (blood, adipose, bone and brain) as a function of both altitude and latitude. With the help of the Geant4 software, we developed a numerical simulation that allowed us to reach our goal; atmospheric neutron ﬂuxes were obtained from the Excel-Based Program for Calculating Atmospheric Cosmic-Ray Spectrum (EXPACS). We found that the RD deposited by atmospheric neutrons increases with the increase in altitude and latitude, e.g., for an altitude of high mountain (4 km), the RD is increased ∼ 19 times; while, for an altitude of commercial ﬂights (10 km), the RD is increased ∼ 156 times; in both cases, regarding the RD at sea level. We also found that, in the range of energies from 1 to 100 MeV, the RD deposited in the bone tissue sample is considerably lower that the RD deposited in the blood, adipose and brain tissue samples. On the other hand, for the range of energies between 200 and 1000 MeV, the RD deposited in the bone tissue sample is considerably greater that the RD deposited in the blood, adipose and brain tissue samples.


Introduction
The atmospheric air showers are initiated by high-energy primary cosmic rays that enter the atmosphere isotropically from outer space, producing a large number of secondaries particles in a serie of successive collisions with target nuclei of the atmospheric constituents [1]. The primary cosmic rays which consists predominantly of protons, alpha particles and heavier nuclei are influenced by the galactic, the interplanetary, the magnetospheric and the geomagnetic magnetic fields while approaching the Earth [2].
In addition, the incoming cosmic rays with energies below about 20 GeV are modulated by the interplanetary magnetic field which is embedded in the solar wind [3], the expanding magnetized plasma generated by the Sun, which decelerates and partially excludes the lower energy cosmic rays from the inner solar system. There is a significant anticorrelation between solar activity and the intensity of the cosmic rays with the energies already mentioned.
Atmospheric neutrons are secondary particles resulting from interactions of primaries with nuclei of air constituents. It is useful to distinguish low-energy neutrons with energies less than about 10 MeV from high-energy neutrons. Low-energy neutrons are mostly evaporation products of excited nuclei and manifest an isotropic angular distribution. High-energy neutrons can be produced by hadronic collisions but also in charge exchange reactions of leading particles at very high energies, the angular distribution of high energy neutrons is anisotropic [2]. In addition, when high-energy particles collide with the atoms in the aircraft material, producing a local shower of particles, including electrons, lighter ions, gamma rays, and neutrons that are dangerous to human health [4].
Because the neutrons are produced by charged particles they inherit and also exhibit both latitude and longitude effects. Furthermore the flux of the low-energy neutron component is modulated by the solar cycle; in addition, strong solar flares may cause significant neutron fluxes in the atmosphere [2], sporadic enhancements of solar cosmic ray fluxes are also caused by coronal mass ejection, in these events the particles are accelerated to energies of hundreds of MeV up to several GeV [5,6].
The secondary energetic particles interacting with the human body may potentially cause an increase in cancer risk as the dose equivalent exposure increases, particularly in passengers and flight crew [7]. High RD may cause the breaks, potentially lethal to the cell by damaging the DNA strands, while low RD of ionizing radiations seems to have carcinogenic effects, even after years or decades, both in the exposed individuals and in subsequent generations [8]. The atmospheric neutron component of this complex radiation field, in particular, holds special interest in the cancer research community. At aircraft altitude (flight level around 10 km) of the total radiation dose deposited by secondary particles, the contribution of neutrons is around 40% [9].
The potential negative effect of atmospheric neutrons on human health is the motivation to carry out the present work, in this, we developed a numerical simulation using Geant4 software, with which, we calculated the radiation dose (RD) deposited by atmospheric neutrons in various tissues of the human body as function of the fluxes of these particles for various altitudes and latitudes; however, in all these geographical points we have maintained the same longitude (0 • ), since these will allow us to show the great variations of the RD as a function of altitude and latitude.
In this work, we have focused on the RD that atmospheric neutrons deposit in human tissues, if the readers want to know the effects of charged particles, they can read for example [6,8,10].

Materials and Methods: Setup of the Simulation
Excel-Based Program for Calculating Atmospheric Cosmic-Ray Spectrum (EXPACS) calculate cosmic ray fluxes of neutrons, protons, muons, electrons, positrons, and photons nearly anytime and anywhere in the Earth's atmosphere [11].
In Figure 1, we show the atmospheric neutron spectra for various altitudes obtained with EXPACS for geographical points with a latitude of 0 • and a longitude of 0 • . These data were calculated for the year 2020, period of minimum solar activity. In Figure 2, we show the atmospheric neutron spectra for various latitudes obtained with EXPACS for geographical points with an altitude of 10 km and a longitude of 0 • . These data were calculated for the year 2020, period of minimum solar activity. The Geant4 software is a toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter. It is used for a variety of applications domains, including high-energy physics, astrophysics and space science, medical physics and radiation protection [12]. Geant4 is used extensively in medical physics applications such as particles beam therapy, microdosimetry and radioprotection. The basic extensibility of the toolkit has facilitated its expansion into new user domains, such as biochemistry, material science and non-destructive scanning.
For this simulation we used as source, fluxes of 5 × 10 5 neutrons with kinetic energies between 1 and 1000 MeV. We also used tissues of blood (G4_BLOOD_ICRP, ρ = 1.06 g/cm 3 ), adipose (G4_ADIPOSE_TISSUE_ICRP, ρ = 0.95 g/cm 3 ), bone (G4_BONE_CORTICAL_ICRP, ρ = 1.92 g/cm 3 ) and brain (G4_BRAIN_ICRP, ρ = 1.04 g/cm 3 ) as samples obtained from Geant4 material's database, with a spherical geometry with a radius of 5 cm. These samples are tissues equivalent reported by The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The ICRP is the primary body in protection against ionising radiation, it is a registered charity and is thus an independent non-governmental organisation created by the 1928 International Congress of Radiology to advance for the public benefit the science of radiological protection [13].
With the help of Geant4 software, we got the RD that neutrons deposit in the different sample tissues as a function of neutron's energy, the neutrons were injected isotropically to each of the samples. We arbitrarily choose geographic points, all of them with the same longitude (0 • ), at these points, we calculated the RD that neutrons deposited in the samples for different altitudes and different latitudes.
To obtain the RD in the tissues, we used the spectra shown in Figures 1 and 2 to calculate the neutron flux for each energy of interest, in addition, these fluxes were calculated for periods of one hour over the spherical area of the samples, later we multiplied the neutron flux and the RD deposited per neutron, for each energy, finally we added all products to obtain the RD deposited in the tissues.

Results and Discussion
When calculating the RD that neutrons deposit in the different sample tissues, under the conditions mentioned in the previous section, we obtained the statistical error less than 1% for each calculated value. Since statistical errors are relatively small, we decided not to point them out in Figure 3 that we present in this section.
In Figure 3, we show the RD that neutrons deposit in the samples as a funtion of their kinetic energy. In this figure, we can see three sections with different behavior of the RD deposited in the samples as a function of the energy of the neutrons; first, for energies of 1 to 20 MeV the RD curves show an increase with the energy of the neutrons; second, for energies of 20 to 500 MeV the RD curves are approximately flat; finally, for greater energies at 500 MeV the RD curves show an increase with the energy of the neutrons. In Figure 3, we can also observe that, neutrons with energy less than 200 MeV deposited a less RD in the bone sample compared with the RD deposited in the other samples, whereas that, the RD deposited in the adipose sample is greater than the RD deposited in blood and brain samples; this is due to the chemical composition of the tissues, for adipose tissue the dominant element is carbon, for blood and brain tissues is oxygen and for bone tissue are oxygen together with calcium. Neutrons with energy equal or greater than 200 MeV deposited a higher RD in the bone sample compared with the RD deposited in the other samples, this occurs because the cross section of the neutron varies with the kinetic energy of this particle.
Considering the RD deposited by the neutrons in the bone tissue sample as a reference, in the range of energies from 1 to 100 MeV, the RD deposited in the blood, adipose and brain tissue samples are 167.9%, 182.8% and 172.3% respectively; while, for the range of energies between 200 and 1000 MeV, the RD deposited in the blood, adipose and brain tissue samples are 81.0%, 80.8% and 80.5% respectively.
The neutron fluxes as a function of the altitude and the geographical latitude were calculated under the conditions mentioned in the previous section. In Figure 4, we show the RD that neutron with energies between 1 and 1000 MeV deposited in the tissue samples for an altitude between 0 and 10 km above sea level. To avoid overlapping of the curves, we have multiplied them by a factor shown in their respective labels.
In Figure 4, we can see that the RD deposited in the tissue samples is minimal at sea level and increases with height, the reason for this is that the neutron flux increases with increasing height. All curves have the same behavior. From the data obtained from the simulation and considering as reference the RD deposited by neutrons at 0 km above sea level, for an altitude of 4 km, corresponding approximately to an altitude of high mountain, the RD is increased ∼19 times, while, for an altitude of 10 km, corresponding to an altitude of commercial flights, the RD is increased ∼156 times. In Figure 5, we show the RD that neutron with energies between 1 and 1000 MeV deposited in the tissue samples as a function of the latitude for an altitude of 10 km above sea level and a longitude of 0 • . To avoid overlapping of the curves, we have multiplied them by a factor shown in their respective labels. We can see that the RD deposited in the tissue samples is lower in equatorial zones (∼0 • ); the above is due to the fact that in these zones the rigidity cutoff is maximum, containing lower flux of cosmic rays and consequences a lower production of atmospheric neutrons. In polar zones (∼80 • ), the flux of cosmic rays is greater due to the low-rigidity cutoff which implies a greater production of atmospheric neutrons and consequently a higher RD deposited in the tissue samples. The RD in polar zones is approximately 4.3 times higher than the RD in equatorial zones for an altitud of 10 km. The statistical errors of the data presented in Figures 4 and 5 are dominated by the propagation of the statistical error that is generated when calculating the neutron flux from the energy spectra, therefore, they present variations with the altitude and the latitude. We also found that statistical errors calculated as a percentage are the same for all tissue samples used.

Conclusions
In this work, and with the help of Geant4 software, first, we calculated the RD that neutrons with energy between 1 and 1000 MeV deposit in blood, adipose, bone and brain tissue samples; second, we calculated the RD that these particles deposit in the tissue samples as a function of different altitudes and latitudes, in both cases, for a longitude of 0 • .
When we considered neutrons with a flat spectra (5 × 10 5 neutrons for each energy) and as a reference the RD deposited by them in the bone tissue sample, we found that in the range of energies from 1 to 100 MeV, the RD deposited in the blood, adipose and brain tissue samples is greater by 67.9%, 82.8% and 72.3% respectively. On the other hand, for the range of energies between 200 and 1000 MeV, the RD deposited in the blood, adipose and brain tissue samples is lower by 19.0%, 19.2% and 19.5% respectively.
When we obtained the atmospheric neutron spectra from [11]; we calculated the RD deposited by these particles in different human tissues as a function of both altitude and latitude and for a longitude of 0 • . The results are shown in Figures 4 and 5. In general, we found that the RD deposited by atmospheric neutrons increases with the increase in altitude and latitude, e.g., for an altitude of 4 km (altitude of high mountain), the RD is increased ∼19 times; while, for an altitude of 10 km (altitude of commercial flights), the RD is increased ∼156 times, respectively; in both cases, regarding the RD at sea level.