Integrating Optical and Wireless Techniques towards Novel Fronthaul and Access Architectures in a 5G NR Framework

.


Introduction
The fifth-generation of mobile network (5G) has already started to be commercially implemented around the world.At this initial implementation stage, 5G typically operates in the non-standalone (NSA) mode, aiming to take advantage of the fourth-generation (4G) infrastructure to deploy 5G new radio (5G NR) systems.Therefore, 5G and 4G share the network infrastructure and must coexist seamlessly [1].Phase 1 of 5G systems is based on the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 15, which defines the 5G NR standard by focusing on the enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) scenario.Technical solutions explored at this stage include radio equipment design, use of additional spectral bands encompassing millimeter-waves (mm-waves), flexible resource allocation, and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) schemes [2,3].In addition, 5G deployment requires a radio access network (RAN) update in order to cope with the planned increase in wireless data traffic.Trends in network planning point to optical-wireless convergence, mobile dense heterogeneous networks (HetNet), centralized RAN (C-RAN), and the so-called "Xhaul", which integrates backhaul (BH), midhaul (MH), and fronthaul (FH) transport networks [4][5][6].
Recently, 3GPP completed Release 16 for phase 2 of 5G systems, which considers ultrareliable low latency communication (URLLC) and massive machine-type communication (mMTC) applications.According to the release, the technical solutions to be explored include integrated access and backhaul (IAB), industrial Internet of Things (IoT), satellite access, and NR-based access to unlicensed spectrum [7].Releases 17 and 18 for 5G are currently in production and scheduled to end in 2021, with the goal of further enhancing mobile systems [8].By the same token, planning of sixth-generation (6G) communications has already begun, focused on providing performance superior to 5G and satisfying future demands as far as 2030.Among the potential technologies for 6G, optical-wireless convergence continues to play an important role for future RANs, whereas terahertz and visible light communications (VLC) have also emerged [9,10].
In this context, a key area of study is microwave photonics (MWP), which takes advantage of optical and mobile communications for signal distribution in a heterogeneous architecture [11,12].MWP techniques have been strongly applied to radiofrequency (RF) generation, processing, detection, transport, and distribution.Notably, radio over fiber (RoF) technology enables transportation and distribution of digital and/or analog signals among central office (CO) and remote radio units (RRUs) via fiber-optic links, giving rise to the fiber-wireless (FiWi) systems [11,13].From a C-RAN point of view, HetNet in conjunction with picocell and femtocell implementations allows system coverage and data rate to be enhanced.In C-RAN architecture, the backhaul and fronthaul links connect CO to the core network, typically carrying digital user data and CO to RRUs, respectively.
Fifth-generation systems are mostly based on digital radio over fiber (D-RoF) using the common radio public interface (CPRI) protocol, in which radio signals are sampled and directly digitalized into baseband data at the remote radio head (RRH) from the cell site.Millimeter-wave operation requires high-speed A/D (analog-to-digital) and D/A (digital-to-analog) converters, creating a bandwidth bottleneck in uncompressed CPRI.To address this issue, two main network alternatives have been actively investigated.One possibility is functional split (FS), widespread by 3GPP under e-CPRI.The FS establishes that some network functionalities be carried out at RRHs, thereby alleviating the transmission rate requirements for the 5G fronthaul.Specifically, 3GPP has defined a series of options for functional split between BBU and RRHs.In short, functional splits decentralize control functionalities in such way as to establish a trade-off between reducing fronthaul throughput and increasing latency.The other option is analog fronthaul (A-RoF), in which the RF wireless signal modulates an optical carrier that is optically distributed.Because there is no high-speed A/D conversion, the system is far less complex and the overall latency is much smaller, dictated essentially by the optical fiber length.
Our research group has been intensely investigating A-RoF solutions for multiband and Gbit/s 5G systems in recent years [14][15][16][17].The solution presented in [14] takes advantage of an operating gigabit passive optical network (GPON) from a local Internet service provider to distribute 5G-like signals, thus making use of an existing network infrastructure for 5G fronthaul in accordance with C-RAN.The approaches presented in [15,16] explore optical link not only for data transmission but also as a medium to perform photonics-assisted RF amplification.In [17], a dual-band wireless fronthaul using an FSS-based focal point/Cassegrain antenna assisted by an optical midhaul was demonstrated.
Alternatively, free-space optical (FSO) technology has also shown potential for 5G transport network deployment using the unlicensed terahertz bands [18,19].For instance, Mufutau et al. successfully reported a hybrid RoF/FSO fronthaul approach in which 5G coexists with 4G by means of coarse wavelength division multiplexing (CWDM) [19].These previous works considered wireless links operating at a variety of radiofrequencies for providing mobile access, which might be either indoor or outdoor.Overall, RF links correspond to the main technical solution employed for access, although visible light communications (VLC) have also been recognized as an alternative for indoor environments, particularly when RF electromagnetic interference must be avoided [20,21].
Apart from a tiny segment of the worldwide market already using VLC, wireless access networks are almost entirely based on electrical solutions, with approximately 70% of macrosites in the world being connected by microwave fronthauls.Although there are many published works investigating individual proposals regarding fronthaul solutions, only a few of them present comparisons between different optical-based fronthaul solutions [22,23].To the best of our knowledge, work addressing and confronting diverse electrical-and optical-based fronthauls is still missing in the specialized literature.
In this context, the current study relies on integrating optical and wireless techniques towards novel fronthaul and access architectures in a NSA 5G NR framework, as proposed in Figure 1.In other words, we report implementations and comparison of diverse MWP techniques towards a non-standalone 5G NR optical-wireless communications (OWC) architecture in such a way that a variety of integrated services may be offered according to the network operator needs.
Appl.Sci.2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 16 many published works investigating individual proposals regarding fronthaul solutions, only a few of them present comparisons between different optical-based fronthaul solutions [22,23].To the best of our knowledge, work addressing and confronting diverse electrical-and optical-based fronthauls is still missing in the specialized literature.
In this context, the current study relies on integrating optical and wireless techniques towards novel fronthaul and access architectures in a NSA 5G NR framework, as proposed in Figure 1.In other words, we report implementations and comparison of diverse MWP techniques towards a non-standalone 5G NR optical-wireless communications (OWC) architecture in such a way that a variety of integrated services may be offered according to the network operator needs.The main contributions of this study are as follows: proposal and implementation of optical-wireless architectures applied to the NSA 5G NR framework; evaluation of diverse transport and access network solutions, including 5G NR dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul, 4G/5G NR fiber-wireless fronthaul, combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul, and 4G/5G NR VLC-based access network; discussion of experimental results regarding 4G and 5G coexistence at Gbit/s throughput and error vector magnitude (EVM) in accordance with 3GPP Release 15.
The focus of our work is data transmission in the physical layer, although Figure 1 provides a unifying view of our applications in a single ecosystem.The rest of the paper is structured as follows.In Section 2, we address different fronthaul configurations.First, in Subsection 2.1, a dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul that enables a backup link for high-reliability services is reported.In Subsection 2.2, a RoF-based fronthaul is demonstrated for simultaneous RF signal distribution at distinct spectral bands.Unlike previous works [7,8], a single wavelength is used to simultaneously cover 4G and 5G NR applications, including millimeter-wave bands.Next, in Subsection 2.3, we discuss a RoF/FSObased fronthaul that enables high-capacity fronthaul extension for regions where optical fibers cannot be deployed all the way.A VLC-based access network for indoor applications is presented in Section 3, targeting applications in which immunity to The main contributions of this study are as follows: proposal and implementation of optical-wireless architectures applied to the NSA 5G NR framework; evaluation of diverse transport and access network solutions, including 5G NR dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul, 4G/5G NR fiber-wireless fronthaul, combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul, and 4G/5G NR VLC-based access network; discussion of experimental results regarding 4G and 5G coexistence at Gbit/s throughput and error vector magnitude (EVM) in accordance with 3GPP Release 15.
The focus of our work is data transmission in the physical layer, although Figure 1 provides a unifying view of our applications in a single ecosystem.The rest of the paper is structured as follows.In Section 2, we address different fronthaul configurations.First, in Section 2.1, a dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul that enables a backup link for highreliability services is reported.In Section 2.2, a RoF-based fronthaul is demonstrated for simultaneous RF signal distribution at distinct spectral bands.Unlike previous works [7,8], a single wavelength is used to simultaneously cover 4G and 5G NR applications, including millimeter-wave bands.Next, in Section 2.3, we discuss a RoF/FSO-based fronthaul that enables high-capacity fronthaul extension for regions where optical fibers cannot be deployed all the way.A VLC-based access network for indoor applications is presented in Section 3, targeting applications in which immunity to electromagnetic interference is crucial.Section 4 compares the obtained results to related works from the literature.Conclusions, final remarks, and future works are outlined in Section 5.

Fronthaul Solutions for 4G/5G
This section reports on the architectures and experimental results for the three fronthaul configurations illustrated in Figure 1, namely 5G NR dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul, 4G/5G NR FiWi-based fronthaul, and combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul.

The 5G NR Dual Wireless and FSO-Based Fronthaul
Figure 2a depicts a block diagram of the dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul architecture, in which the two parallel data transmission paths enable link dynamic selection according to transmission performance at a given instant, while the other link serves as a backup.The FSO and RF links were implemented at 1550 nm and 38 GHz, respectively.The hybrid FSO/RF system was analyzed under the 5G NR standard operating with 400 MHz bandwidth and 120 kHz between orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers for quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and 16-and 64-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM).
Appl.Sci.2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 16 electromagnetic interference is crucial.Section 4 compares the obtained results to related works from the literature.Conclusions, final remarks, and future works are outlined in Section 5.

Fronthaul Solutions for 4G/5G
This section reports on the architectures and experimental results for the three fronthaul configurations illustrated in Figure 1, namely 5G NR dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul, 4G/5G NR FiWi-based fronthaul, and combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul.In the experiments, a SMVB100A vector signal generator (VSG) was responsible for generating 5G NR signal at 1 GHz with 400 MHz bandwidth for the QPSK, 16-QAM, and 64-QAM schemes.In the FSO link, the modulated RF signal was inserted into a single-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) based at the quadrature point.A distributed feedback (DFB) laser at 1550 nm provided the optical carrier, which fed the MZM after passing through a polarization controller (PC).The MZM output was coupled to a collimator to prepare the optical beam for transmission in free space.The transmitted optical beam was then captured by a M-5X objective lens and coupled to a single-mode fiber (SMF).The received signal was amplified by an Erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and then photodetected by a p-intrinsic-n (PIN) broadband photodetector (u 2 t XPDV2120RA).Before demodulation in the electrical spectrum analyzer (FSW), the RF signal was amplified by a low-noise amplifier (LNA, EA 1 ).As in references [24] and [25], an FSO link of a few meters was taken as a proof-of-concept for 5G networks to assure an eye-safe indoor environment.As shown below, real-life performance was emulated by varying the optical power reaching the optical receiver.

The 5G NR Dual Wireless and FSO-Based Fronthaul
Meanwhile, for the RF link, the same 5G NR signal, once again generated by a SMVB100A VSG, was used to drive the PSG E8267D equipment, which upconverted the 5G NR frequency to 38 GHz.Posterior, its output was connected to a 25 dBi horn antenna, and an identical antenna was used at the receiver side with the same height and polarization.A two-stage amplification (EA 2 and EA 3 ) scheme was employed before demodulation.
The performance of the hybrid FSO/RF is presented in Figure 2b,c through EVM RMS measurements at different power levels at the receiver, emulating equivalent attenuation levels according to visibility and rain conditions.These power levels at the receiver ranged from −41.9 to −7.4 dBm.Regarding the effect of rain attenuation, the attenuation levels used for the FSO link ranged from 0 to 56 mm/h, while the values ranged from 0 to 102 mm/h for the wireless link.For the specific case of 64-QAM, the 3GPP EVM RMS limit was reached at about the same precipitation intensity for both FSO and 38 GHz wireless links (36 mm/h, Figure 2b).However, as shown in Figure 2b, while operating in a rainy environment, the wireless link suffered less significant performance degradation as the rain intensity increased.
Figure 2c depicts the dependance of EVM regarding visibility for the FSO link for three distinct modulation formats.In every case, successful transmission within the 3GPP standards required a visibility above 780 m.In contrast, the visibility issue was much less severe for the wireless link.In fact, our experimental results demonstrated a 1.61 Gbps 64-QAM throughput, which is within the 3GPP EVM requirements, as long as the rain intensity was less than 36.4mm/h (see Figure 2a) and the visibility exceeded 40 m.

4G/5G NR Fiber-Wireless (FiWi) Fronthaul
The long-term evolution-advanced (LTE-A) and 5G NR signals have similar physical channel configurations, including primary (P-SS) and secondary synchronization signal (S-SS), physical transmission channel (PBCH), demodulation reference (DMRS), and shared physical data channel (PDSCH).Different modulation formats are used for the data and control channels.For instance, data signals might be modulated in 64-QAM format, while binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation is applied for modulating the P-SS and S-SS channels.In addition, QPSK and 64-QAM are utilized for PBCH-DMRS and PDSCH signals, respectively [19].
The EVM RMS performance of the FiWi system was investigated for the eRAC scenario operating in the 700 MHz frequency range.Figure 3a displays a block diagram of the experimental arrangement of the proposed FiWi system, which employs an A-RoF configuration based on external modulation and direct detection followed by a link access for increased reach.
whereas the 5G NR central frequency was varied from 760 to 758 MHz.For a 18 MHz frequency offset, there was a spectral overlap of 2 MHz between the signals, resulting in EVMRMS higher than 19%.This exceeds the limits specified by 3GPP [27], making the system unsuitable for 64-QAM transmission.In contrast, the 19 MHz offset was enough to assure an EVMRMS value below 3%.For this offset, there was still a spectral overlap of 1 MHz between the signals.However, this overlap occurred in the lateral lobes and did not significantly affect the quality of the received signal after the optical fronthaul.One can clearly distinguish each synchronism, control, and data symbols transmitted as the obtained EVMRMS were 2.5% and 2.4% for 5G NR and LTE-A, respectively.Furthermore, there were no noticeable phase rotation distortions in the detected constellations after the fiber-wireless transmission, thus demonstrating successful and seamless coexistence between 5G NR and LTE-A signals.

Combined Fiber-Optic and FSO-Based 5G Fronthaul
The combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul followed by wireless access extension is described in a block diagram in Figure 4a.The system encompasses RoF, FSO, and wireless technologies in a single architecture that takes advantage of a hybrid RoF/FSO link for fronthaul integration followed by dual-band 5G NR wireless access.The FSO link enables last-mile applications when there are restrictions to the placement of a fiber-optic connection, thereby increasing system flexibility.After photodetection, further reach is achieved by wireless access.).This approach allowed the transmission of the LTE-A and 5G NR signals coexisting in adjacent channels, thereby making use of the non-standalone transmission mode proposed by 3GPP in Release 15 [3].
A dual-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator (DD-MZM) modulated an optical carrier provided by a laser at 1560 nm with two distinct RF signals.The optical beam was then launched into a single-mode fiber with 0 dBm of optical power.Nonlinearities were not observed in our approach as the optical power level in the SMF did not reach the power thresholds leading to nonlinear effects [26].Regarding the electrical power levels, RF 1 and RF 2 signals were transmitted at −5 dBm, while the PIN photodetector (EOT ET-5000F) received a fixed optical power of −3 dBm.After photodetection, the signals in the electrical domain were amplified by about 44 dB (EA 1 ) to compensate for the overall system losses.Two log-periodic broadband antennas with 5 dBi gain were used to transmit and receive both RF 1 and RF 2 , and a 10 m wireless transmission was performed as a proof-of-concept.At the receiver side, a Keysight MXA N9020A vector signal analyzer (VSA 1 ) was used to demodulate the received signals and provide the EVM RMS measurement results.
In the experiments, a 19 MHz frequency offset was employed between RF 1 and RF 2 .This offset was determined as a preliminary step in order to find the minimum frequency offset allowing seamless coexistence between the RF 1 and RF 2 signals.Specifically, we measured the EVM RMS as a function of the central frequency offset between the LTE-A and 5G NR signals.The LTE-A central frequency was kept at 778 MHz central frequency, whereas the 5G NR central frequency was varied from 760 to 758 MHz.For a 18 MHz frequency offset, there was a spectral overlap of 2 MHz between the signals, resulting in EVM RMS higher than 19%.This exceeds the limits specified by 3GPP [27], making the system unsuitable for 64-QAM transmission.In contrast, the 19 MHz offset was enough to assure an EVM RMS value below 3%.For this offset, there was still a spectral overlap of 1 MHz between the signals.However, this overlap occurred in the lateral lobes and did not significantly affect the quality of the received signal after the optical fronthaul.
Having established an offset of 19 MHz, the optical-wireless system based on nonstandalone mode was implemented using a RF power level of −5 dBm for the RF 1 and RF 2 signals and an optical power of −3 dBm at the input of the photodetector.The RF signals were configured with 19 MHz frequency offset, 64-QAM, and 20 MHz bandwidth, thereby achieving a maximum throughput of 182.8 Mbit/s for the 5G NR and LTE-A signals.Figure 3b reports the measured spectrum and detected constellations for the LTE-A and 5G NR signals.One can clearly distinguish each synchronism, control, and data symbols transmitted as the obtained EVM RMS were 2.5% and 2.4% for 5G NR and LTE-A, respectively.Furthermore, there were no noticeable phase rotation distortions in the detected constellations after the fiber-wireless transmission, thus demonstrating successful and seamless coexistence between 5G NR and LTE-A signals.

Combined Fiber-Optic and FSO-Based 5G Fronthaul
The combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul followed by wireless access extension is described in a block diagram in Figure 4a.The system encompasses RoF, FSO, and wireless technologies in a single architecture that takes advantage of a hybrid RoF/FSO link for fronthaul integration followed by dual-band 5G NR wireless access.The FSO link enables last-mile applications when there are restrictions to the placement of a fiber-optic connection, thereby increasing system flexibility.After photodetection, further reach is achieved by wireless access.
For the experiments, we simultaneously transmitted two RF signals in the hybrid configuration in accordance with the frequency bands standardized by 3GPP Release 15.A 100 MHz bandwidth 5G NR signal at 3.5 GHz was generated using the VSG 1 , whereas a 400 MHz bandwidth M-QAM signal was generated in baseband using an AWG and upconverted to 26 GHz by means of the VSG 2 .Finally, a diplexer combined both signals, resulting in 3 dBm electrical power at the optical modulator.An OS-TL-D-C-50-200-1-S-FA DFB laser from Golight generated a 13 dBm optical carrier at 1550 nm, which was modulated by the RF-driven signals discussed above using a single-drive MZM.The modulated optical carrier was transmitted throughout a 12.5 km fiber-optic fronthaul to the collimator, and then, as a proof-of-concept, it followed a 1 m long FSO fronthaul in such a way as to assure an eye-safe FSO link.For the experiments, we simultaneously transmitted two RF signals in the hybrid configuration in accordance with the frequency bands standardized by 3GPP Release 15.A 100 MHz bandwidth 5G NR signal at 3.5 GHz was generated using the VSG1, whereas a 400 MHz bandwidth M-QAM signal was generated in baseband using an AWG and upconverted to 26 GHz by means of the VSG2.Finally, a diplexer combined both signals, resulting in 3 dBm electrical power at optical modulator.An OS-TL-D-C-50-200-1-S-FA DFB laser from Golight generated a 13 dBm optical carrier at 1550 nm, which was modulated by the RF-driven signals discussed above using a single-drive MZM.The modulated optical carrier was transmitted throughout a 12.5 km fiber-optic fronthaul to the collimator, and then, as a proof-of-concept, it followed a 1 m long FSO fronthaul in such a way as to assure an eye-safe FSO link.
At the receiver side, an optical lens with a 5-fold collimation factor coupled the freespace optical beam into an optical patch cord.A 3-axis micropositioner was used to minimize vibration and misalignments losses.Next, the optical signal was amplified by an EDFA, whereas a variable optical attenuator (VOA) and an optical power monitor (OPM) were used for controlling and monitoring the optical power at the input of the PIN broadband photodetector from u 2 t.It is worth highlighting that the EDFA noise was considered in the approach as there was no filter before the photodetector.If the EDFA amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) had been filtered out, an enhanced performance could have At the receiver side, an optical lens with a 5-fold collimation factor coupled the free-space optical beam into an optical patch cord.A 3-axis micropositioner was used to minimize vibration and misalignments losses.Next, the optical signal was amplified by an EDFA, whereas a variable optical attenuator (VOA) and an optical power monitor (OPM) were used for controlling and monitoring the optical power at the input of the PIN broadband photodetector from u 2 t.It is worth highlighting that the EDFA noise was considered in the approach as there was no filter before the photodetector.If the EDFA amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) had been filtered out, an enhanced performance could have been achieved.After photodetection, the resulting RF signals were amplified by the electrical amplifier EA 1 by about 24 dB.A diplexer was used to separate the 3.5 and 26 GHz signals.Two 5 dBi gain log-periodic antennas were used for transmitting and receiving the 5G NR signal at 3.5 GHz.In parallel, two 25 dBi gain horn antennas enabled 8 m of mm-wave wireless link at 26 GHz aimed at indoor applications.At the receiver side, the 5G signal was amplified (EA 2 ) by 20 dB and evaluated employing an FSW-8351VSA (VSA 1 ).Meanwhile, the 400 MHz bandwidth M-QAM signal was amplified (EA 3 ) by 35 dB and evaluated using a DSAZ632A high-frequency oscilloscope (VSA 2 ).
The system performance was investigated by assessing the hybrid architecture in two distinct scenarios in terms of EVM RMS and in accordance with 3GPP Release 15 specifications.The first step was to evaluate the hybrid RoF/FSO fronthaul at the photodetector output, whereas the second step consisted of actually analyzing the dual-band 5G NR wireless system employing the hybrid RoF/FSO fronthaul, as depicted in Figure 4b.It is worth mentioning that the experimental results were achieved using 3 dBm optical power at the photodetector input for both scenarios.In particular, for the 5G NR signal at 3.5 GHz, we selected 64-QAM, which resulted in 578 Mbit/s and measured EVM RMS of around 2.4%, thereby satisfying the 3GPP requirements (8%) by a wide margin.Likewise, the received 400 MHz bandwidth signal at 26 GHz was within the 3GPP recommendations, providing 2.4 Gbit/s throughput.The increased EVM RMS value (5%) for mm-wave transmission was due to the RF cables, SD-MZM, and photodetector frequency responses at the mm-wave band.Overall, the proposed hybrid RoF/FSO fronthaul provided 3 Gbit/s of total throughput, which is within the 3GPP requirements EVM RMS , thereby enabling further network reach by wireless access.
The second analysis consisted of evaluating the combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul followed by the 8 m wireless access, as reported in Figure 4b.As expected, the wireless channel impaired the transmitted signal in both phase and magnitude as could be observed by the received symbols in the RoF/FSO/wireless constellations.Nevertheless, the 5G NR signal attained the EVM RMS requirements with 3.2% margin, which may be explored for either increasing the signal data rate or extending the wireless reach.In contrast, the propagation conditions at 26 GHz critically impaired the 400 MHz bandwidth signal, and hence the EVM RMS did not meet the 3GPP recommendations.As an alternative, we employed a 200 MHz bandwidth under 16-QAM to overcome this performance shortcoming.With this bandwidth reduction, the hybrid dual-band 5G NR system achieved an EVM RMS value of around 12%, which is still within the 3GPP limit for 16-QAM (12.5%), due to the severe propagation impairments at mm-waves.In spite of the bandwidth reduction at 26 GHz, the hybrid RoF/FSO/wireless 5G NR system was able to provide 1.4 Gbit/s total throughput, thus fulfilling the Release 15 recommendations and demonstrating feasibility of the system while giving the remarkable additional advantage of FSO fronthaul flexibility.

4G/5G NR VLC-Based Access Network
VLC has emerged as an alternative for transmitting the 5G NR standard or other wireless signals in environments where electromagnetic interferences must be minimal, such as in hospitals, petrochemical industrial plants, and airplanes.Furthermore, LEDbased VLC systems can take advantage of environment lighting to provide free-space data transmission using wavelengths in the visible part of the optical spectrum.The LED is directly modulated, and the optical link operates in IM-DD mode at the photodiode [28].By using an LED, the wide light beam divergence allows the desired area to be fully eliminated, thereby enabling simultaneous access for multiple devices and/or patterns of data traffic [21].In addition, carrier aggregation strategies can be employed to increase the effective user throughput.
Figure 5a depicts the experimental set-up diagram of the LED-based VLC access point for simultaneous transmission of the 5G NR standard signal and an LTE-A three-band signal.RGBA (red, green, blue, and amber) LEDs were considered as the light source because they provide larger modulation bandwidth in comparison to white commercial LEDs [29].In particular, the final selection of red LED (623 nm optical carrier) was dictated by the manufacturer's datasheet, which indicates that this wavelength offers the best trade-off between output power and quantum efficiency.In the experiments, the 5G NR signal was generated using a SMBV100B vector signal generator (VSG 1 ), while a PSGE8267D vector signal generator (VSG 2 ) and a M9505A arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) were employed to generate the LTE-A three-band signal.The RF signals were electrically combined and directly modulated the red LED by means of a bias tee.The LED light beam directivity was enhanced by a reflector and launched in a free-space link of 0.75 m.
At the receiver side, a plane convex lens with the diameter and focal distance of 25.4 and 35.0 mm, respectively, was used to focus the incident beam at the input of the PIN photodetector (EOT ET-2030).Next, an RLC equalizer similar to the one described in [29] was implemented to compensate for the LED frequency response.A DC blocker ensured that the DC component from the OE conversion did not reach the VSA.Finally, a cascade of four electrical amplifiers (EAs) assured a 50 dB gain in the received signal.
The system performance was evaluated by EVM RMS measurements.The 5G NR signal was generated with a bandwidth of 10 MHz, 64-QAM, centered at 46 MHz.The configuration of the LTE-A signal represented the aggregation of three intra-band carriers in order to triplicate the effective throughput of a single user.Specifically, the LTE-A signal was generated with three sub-bands of 12 MHz, 64-QAM, at 57, 69, and 81 MHz, named as 64-QAM 1 , 64-QAM 2 , and 64-QAM 3 , respectively.
signal was generated using a SMBV100B vector signal generator (VSG1), while a PSGE8267D vector signal generator (VSG2) and a M9505A arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) were employed to generate the LTE-A three-band signal.The RF signals were electrically combined and directly modulated the red LED by means of a bias tee.The LED light beam directivity was enhanced by a reflector and launched in a free-space link of 0.75 m.
At the receiver side, a plane convex lens with the diameter and focal distance of 25.4 and 35.0 mm, respectively, was used to focus the incident beam at the input of the PIN photodetector (EOT ET-2030).Next, an RLC equalizer similar to the one described in [29] was implemented to compensate for the LED frequency response.A DC blocker ensured that the DC component from the OE conversion did not reach the VSA.Finally, a cascade of four electrical amplifiers (EAs) assured a 50 dB gain in the received signal.
The system performance was evaluated by EVMRMS measurements.The 5G NR signal was generated with a bandwidth of 10 MHz, 64-QAM, centered at 46 MHz.The configuration of the LTE-A signal represented the aggregation of three intra-band carriers in order to triplicate the effective throughput of a single user.Specifically, the LTE-A signal was generated with three sub-bands of 12 MHz, 64-QAM, at 57, 69, and 81 MHz, named as 64-QAM1, 64-QAM2, and 64-QAM3, respectively.Figure 5b shows the received spectrum as well as the measured constellations and EVMRMS values.The received signal power decreased as the operation frequency increased on account of the LED frequency response, degrading both the signal-noise ratio (SNR) and the EVMRMS value.The constellations in Figure 5b illustrate these performance issues by considering the four transmitted bands.The measured EVMRMS values were 4.06%, 4.15%, 6.18%, and 6.45% for 5G NR, 64-QAM1, 64-QAM2, and 64-QAM3, respectively, Figure 5b shows the received spectrum as well as the measured constellations and EVM RMS values.The received signal power decreased as the operation frequency increased on account of the LED frequency response, degrading both the signal-noise ratio (SNR) and the EVM RMS value.The constellations in Figure 5b illustrate these performance issues by considering the four transmitted bands.The measured EVM RMS values were 4.06%, 4.15%, 6.18%, and 6.45% for 5G NR, 64-QAM 1 , 64-QAM 2 , and 64-QAM 3 , respectively, which are all within the 3GPP limit of 8% for the 64-QAM format [27].The effective throughputs measured for the 5G NR signal and the aggregation of the three 64-QAM signals were 38 and 180 Mbit/s, respectively, rates which are attractive for a VLC access point.

Related Works and Comparison to the State of the Art
This section reports on a review of the state of the art by comparing optical-wireless techniques for 5G radio access network reported in the literature to the results of our implementation.Five architectures were considered, namely FiWi mm-wave/IFoF links, multiuser FiWi links, parallel FiWi and FSO relay links, RoF links followed by a FSO-section, and VLC access.Table 1 summarizes the aforementioned literature and comparisons to our work with the aim of contributing to and advancing the body of knowledge in this field.FiWi mm-wave/IFoF architectures, which include digital or analog RoF approaches followed by wireless transmission, have benefited from diverse technical solutions aimed at improving capacity and coverage [30][31][32].For instance, Li et al. reported a 24 Gbit/s FiWi mm-wave link by exploiting 6 GHz bandwidth [30], whereas Argyris et al. demonstrated a similar bit rate in a mm-wave/IFoF link with electrical subcarrier multiplexing [31].Mm-wave/IFoF links have even been deployed over legacy PON as an alternative for 5G fronthauling [32].
Advances in the multiuser FiWi links include simultaneous transmission of multiple RF signals at distinct frequency bands [14] as well as the use of phased array antennas for beamforming and beamsteering [33][34][35].In [14], we presented a FiWi system over legacy PON based on DD-MZM that was able to cover the 5G eMBB scenario at FR1 and FR2, thereby enabling applications including long reach, fiber-to-the-home, and machine-tomachine communication.In [33], Ruggeri et al. reported a multiuser FiWi mm-wave/IFoF system taking advantage of a 32-element 60 GHz phased array antenna with beamsteering capability.In [34], Huang et al. demonstrated the possibility of integrating self-steering array beamforming to the FiWi architecture.Additionally, a photonic beamforming-based FiWi architecture was experimentally demonstrated in [35].
Multiple works have reported a hybrid mm-wave and FSO fronthaul aimed at increasing system reliability.The FSO and mm-waves links can operate in distinct architectures, namely simultaneous transmission for increased throughput in parallel with switchable transmission and a cascade system with FSO followed by a wireless link.Shakir et al. reported a hybrid system that simultaneously transmitted the same data over both links, namely an FSO at 1550 nm and mm-waves at 60 GHz [36].The link selection was based on SNR for both approaches in accordance with decision thresholds aimed at evaluating BPSK transmission in a turbulent channel.Zhang et al. presented a hybrid FSO and mm-wave link for 5G backhauls operating at 1553.96 nm and 60 GHz, respectively.The link option was based on maximum-ratio combining (MRC) and was evaluated in terms of EVM RMS for a 16-QAM signal in turbulent, fog, and rain conditions [37].Additionally, the authors in [25] reported a hybrid 1550 nm FSO link cascaded with a 28 GHz RF link for 5G backhaul and fronthaul applications.The experiments consisted of evaluating the cascaded approach in terms of bit error rate (BER), EVM, and visibility range under the same dusty conditions.The experimental results demonstrated that the dust environment did not impair the RF link at 28 GHz, enabling the RF link to operate as a backup for FSO [25].
The FSO link has also been employed for extending the RoF fronthaul to sites where fiber optics do not reach, thus maintaining the optical communication advantages.In this way, Mufutau et al. demonstrated a hybrid 4G/5G optical fiber-wireless system, including a free-space optics fronthaul [19].The results showed that a 100 MHz bandwidth 5G signal transmission using A-RoF throughout a 8 km fiber-optic fronthaul could coexist on the same LTE fronthaul infrastructure.Additionally, a hybrid fiber and FSO fronthaul demonstrated the 4G and 5G operability at 2.6 and 3.5 GHz, respectively.Nguyen et al. experimentally implemented a radio-over-fiber followed by an FSO fronthaul and mmwaves wireless transmission aimed at broadband wireless access [18].The performance was evaluated by transmitting 4-, 16-, and 64-QAM LTE signals over the hybrid link and evaluating the EVM parameter as a function of weak-to-strong atmospheric turbulence regimes.Furthermore, Bohata et al. presented a radio-over-fiber combined with FSO and RF transmission for the 5G networks [24].The authors used the 24-26 GHz frequency band and a particular direct intensity modulation solution for transmitting a 100 MHz bandwidth 64-QAM signal.The link performance was evaluated by exposing the FSO section to atmospheric turbulence and analyzing the SNR and EVM RMS .
In parallel with the wireless techniques for access point, VLC systems have been emerging as a potential technology to accomplish the 5G requirements and beyond.They are mainly composed of light-emitting diodes, which can be used for simultaneously lighting the environment and transmitting data.In this way, Yeh et al. reported a GaN LED-based visible light communication using a 4 × 4 color polarization multiplexing and on-off keying (OOK) [38].The system attained 2.3 Gbit/s over 1 m employing MIMO and pre-equalization under the illumination of 6.9-136.1 lux.Recent works have shown the use of VLC for 5G.For instance, Monteiro et al. reported a comparison among 5G waveform candidates, namely filter bank multicarrier (FBMC), generalized frequency division multiplexing (GFDM), and OFDM, with regard to a single-input single-output VLC system [39].On the other hand, VLC systems may employ lasers as a light source to achieve higher throughput.Wei et al. reported a VLC system employing a white-light phosphor laser for illuminating and providing 6.9 Gbit/s over 1.5 m [40].
In this work, we examined an innovative proposal for optical-wireless architectures applied to the NSA 5G new radio framework.In contrast to previous works, we experimentally demonstrated 4G and 5G NR coexistence in the 700 MHz band taking into account a FiWi system.
Regarding the dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul architecture, our implementation employed the 5G NR standard.The parallel FSO at 1550 nm and mm-wave link at 38 GHz enabled a dynamic selection according to its transmission performance, whereas the other link operated as a backup.Its performance was investigated by assessing the EVM RMS for different power levels at the receiver to emulate the equivalent attenuation levels for visibility and rain conditions.The attenuation levels used for the FSO link were from 0 to 56 mm/h, whereas the values ranged from 0 to 102 mm/h for the wireless link.Overall, our 5G NR experimental results demonstrated 1.61 Gbit/s total throughput, which is within the 3GPP EVM RMS requirements, for rain intensity less than 36.4mm/h and visibility above 40 m.
Moreover, we examined a fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul followed by a dual-band 5G NR wireless access, including mm-waves.The FSO link enables last-mile applications, thereby increasing system flexibility and providing optical fiber-like throughput.The system performance was investigated by assessing the hybrid architecture in two distinct scenarios in terms of EVM RMS and in accordance with 3GPP, namely the RoF/FSO fronthaul at the photodetector output and the dual-band 5G NR wireless system employing RoF/FSO as fronthaul.Overall, the proposed hybrid RoF/FSO fronthaul provided 3 Gbit/s total throughput with plenty of margin in terms of EVM RMS , thereby enabling wireless access.The dual-band 5G NR wireless system assisted by a hybrid RoF/FSO fronthaul demonstrated the feasibility of the system by providing 1.4 Gbit/s total throughput, thus fulfilling the 3GPP Release 15 specifications.
Finally, the RGB-based VLC system for indoor applications was examined, in which immunity to electromagnetic interference is crucial.We transmitted a standard 5G NR signal and 3 LTE-A bands in order to attend to multiple users employing a single red LED, which offers the best trade-off between output power and quantum efficiency.The system performance was evaluated by assessing each transmitted signal in terms of SNR, constellation symbols dispersion, and consequently the EVM RMS .The 5G NR VLC system provided 218 Mbit/s throughput and EVM RMS as low as 6.45% considering all transmitted signals, thereby demonstrating the viability of VLC for 5G networks.

Conclusions
We have successfully proposed and reported on an efficient optical-wireless architecture applied to the non-standalone 5G new radio framework and compared the system to related works in the literature.Several distinct electrical-and optical-based fronthaul approaches combining free-space optical, wireless links, and RoF techniques were deployed for selection according to network operator requirements.First, a dual 38 GHz wireless and FSO-based fronthaul architecture enabled a backup link for high-reliability services.Next, a fiber-wireless configuration based on an analog RoF link followed by a wireless extension was studied for simultaneous RF signal distribution of both LTE-A and 5G NR signals.Finally, fiber optics and FSO techniques were integrated into a single fronthaul to extend the fronthaul reach where fiber optics cannot be deployed.After photodetection, further access extension was achieved by wireless signal transmission of the two 3GPP Release 15 spectral bands of 3.5 and 26 GHz.All three investigated approaches demonstrated performance within the 3GPP EVM RMS requirements prescribed by 5G NR Release 15.In addition, a VLC access network with carrier aggregation was examined to increase user throughput when immunity to EM interference is paramount.The reported solutions may be integrated in a flexible optical-wireless platform for 5G and beyond, allowing their coexistence with 4G over a shared fronthaul infrastructure.Future works should consider implementation of the proposed architecture to either downlink an uplink or to increase the FSO reach up to hundreds of meters in an outdoor scenario.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Optical-wireless communication system based on RoF/FSO/wireless fronthaul configurations combined to VLC/wireless access for 5G and beyond.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Optical-wireless communication system based on RoF/FSO/wireless fronthaul configurations combined to VLC/wireless access for 5G and beyond.

Figure
Figure2adepicts a block diagram of the dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul architecture, in which the two parallel data transmission paths enable link dynamic selection according to transmission performance at a given instant, while the other link serves as a backup.The FSO and RF links were implemented at 1550 nm and 38 GHz, respectively.The hybrid FSO/RF system was analyzed under the 5G NR standard operating with 400 MHz bandwidth and 120 kHz between orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) subcarriers for quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and 16-and 64-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM).

Figure 2 .Figure 2 .
Figure 2. The 5G NR dual wireless and FSO-based fronthaul.(a) Block diagram of the proposed hybrid wireless-FSO system.From the left, the signal generated by the vector signal generator (VSG) SMVB100A reaches the FSW signal and

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The 4G/5G NR fiber-optic-based fronthaul architecture.(a) Block diagram; (b) coexistence analysis between 4G and 5G technologies in the optical-wireless system.Having established an offset of 19 MHz, the optical-wireless system based on nonstandalone mode was implemented using a RF power level of −5 dBm for the RF1 and RF2 signals and an optical power of −3 dBm at the input of the photodetector.The RF signals were configured with 19 MHz frequency offset, 64-QAM, and 20 MHz bandwidth, thereby achieving a maximum throughput of 182.8 Mbit/s for the 5G NR and LTE-A signals.Figure 3b reports the measured spectrum and detected constellations for the LTE-A and 5G NR signals.One can clearly distinguish each synchronism, control, and data symbols transmitted as the obtained EVMRMS were 2.5% and 2.4% for 5G NR and LTE-A, respectively.Furthermore, there were no noticeable phase rotation distortions in the detected constellations after the fiber-wireless transmission, thus demonstrating successful and seamless coexistence between 5G NR and LTE-A signals.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The 4G/5G NR fiber-optic-based fronthaul architecture.(a) Block diagram; (b) coexistence analysis between 4G and 5G technologies in the optical-wireless system.An EXG generator (N5171B) from Keysight generated the LTE-A signal (VSG 2 ) at 778 MHz, which was configured offline using the Keysight Signal Studio software for generating signals with 20 MHz bandwidth and 64-QAM.The 20 MHz baseband 5G NR signal was also configured by means of the Signal Studio software in conjunction with an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG M9505A).Next, the PSG E8267D converted the baseband 5G NR signal to the 759 MHz band (VSG 1 ).This approach allowed the transmission of the LTE-A and 5G NR signals coexisting in adjacent channels, thereby making use of the non-standalone transmission mode proposed by 3GPP in Release 15 [3].A dual-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator (DD-MZM) modulated an optical carrier provided by a laser at 1560 nm with two distinct RF signals.The optical beam was then launched into a single-mode fiber with 0 dBm of optical power.Nonlinearities were not observed in our approach as the optical power level in the SMF did not reach the power thresholds leading to nonlinear effects[26].Regarding the electrical power levels, RF 1 and RF 2 signals were transmitted at −5 dBm, while the PIN photodetector (EOT ET-5000F) received a fixed optical power of −3 dBm.After photodetection, the signals in the electrical domain were amplified by about 44 dB (EA 1 ) to compensate for the overall system losses.Two log-periodic broadband antennas with 5 dBi gain were used to transmit and receive

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul architecture.(a) Block diagram; (b) performance analysis of 5G NR and M-QAM signals in the optical-wireless system.The constellations from the RoF/FSO/wireless approach show 16-and 64-QAM received symbols suitable for demodulation.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Combined fiber-optic and FSO-based 5G fronthaul architecture.(a) Block diagram; (b) performance analysis of 5G NR and M-QAM signals in the optical-wireless system.The constellations from the RoF/FSO/wireless approach show 16and 64-QAM received symbols suitable for demodulation.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The 4G/5G NR VLC-based access network architecture.(a) Block diagram; (b) electrical spectrum and EVMRMS at the receiver.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The 4G/5G NR VLC-based access network architecture.(a) Block diagram; (b) electrical spectrum and EVM RMS at the receiver.

Table 1 .
State of the art on optical-wireless techniques for 5G radio access network.