Application of Innovative SMA-MA Mixtures on Bridges

This paper presents a case study of the application of an innovative asphaltic mixture used for making protective layers on bridges. This mixture, called stone mastic asphalt rich in bitumen mastic (shortened to SMA-MA) produces an impervious surface, resistant to permanent deformation and fatigue, easily produced and laid down on bridge decks. The authors analyzed the state of knowledge on the asphalt mixtures used on bridges. This article describes the first trials with the SMA-MA mixtures and an example of the most spectacular application.


Conventional Asphalt Pavements Used on Bridges
Bridge pavements behave differently from typical pavements placed on the ground. There are a number of design criteria that can be used to design road pavements with optimum dimensions [1][2][3] yet these criteria are not applicable to bridge pavements. In the latter case, there are no unequivocal design criteria [4,5] and conventional design methods turn out to be inadequate for bridge pavements [6]. The actual life of bridge pavements turns out to be shorter [7] than the life of ground-supported pavements. In addition, bridge designers, focusing primarily on the structural aspects and the load capacity of the bridge itself, fail to approach the problem of bridge pavement durability in a correct manner. On bridges we deal with specific loading conditions [8,9], different from those found in the case of ground-supported structures. These specific conditions include, without limitation, the possibility of high amplitudes of vertical deflections (imposed by vehicles) and horizontal displacements (due to temperature variation) and vibration of the supporting structure. Bridge pavements have the following main functions [10,11]: • Spread the loads over the bridge deck; • Dampen the dynamic effects caused by traffic loading; • Accommodate strains of the bridge deck caused by temperature variation in the range −30 • C to +70 • C; • Ensure the required interlayer bond, including bond between the waterproofing layers and the deck; • Ensure the required evenness, tightness, surface roughness and resistance to abrasion, rheological effects and rutting; • Reduce sensitivity of the asphalt mixtures to both low and high temperatures.
Different designs were applied in Poland and other European countries for bridge pavements [12,13]. At present, bitumen-bound materials [4,9,13,14] are used most often on bridges. The conventional surfacing systems used on bridge decks comprise the waterproofing layer, protective (binder) course and wearing course (Figure 1).
. The waterproofing layer is an important part of the bridge surfacing system and should [15][16][17]: • Be impervious to water, water vapor and gases; • Be resistant to the action of chemicals related to operation and maintenance of roads; • Have smooth surface to facilitate drainage of water from the surface and reinforcing fleece embedded in the binder (if designed); • Be made of materials whose coefficient of thermal expansion is similar to that of the bridge deck, • Be elastic over a wide temperature range (-30 °C to +70 °C); • Adhere well to base and ensure good bond with the protective or wearing courses (in the case of one-layer surfacing systems); • Be resistant to mechanical damage and the working temperatures of asphalt mixture used for the protective layer (at least 160-240 °C).
The waterproofing layer should be at least 5 mm thick in the case of sheet materials and at least 2 mm thick in the case of coatings.
Torch-on membranes are the most popular deck waterproofing material used on the bridges in Poland [18]. However, torch-on membranes involve certain risks, related, inter alia to their application (bonding to the base in particular) and the process of placing of mastic asphalt to the protective course. These risks include [19][20][21]: • Burning through the membrane during application (the temperature of burned gasses during heating up the underside of the membrane with a gas torch can reach from about 700 °C to as much as 1400 °C) ( Figure 2). • Forming of bulges during placement of the protective layer due to local lack of adhesion between the membrane and substrate and the increase in partial pressure of air in the voids.

•
Destruction of membrane (structural degradation). The waterproofing layer is an important part of the bridge surfacing system and should [15][16][17]: • Be impervious to water, water vapor and gases; • Be resistant to the action of chemicals related to operation and maintenance of roads; • Have smooth surface to facilitate drainage of water from the surface and reinforcing fleece embedded in the binder (if designed); • Be made of materials whose coefficient of thermal expansion is similar to that of the bridge deck, • Be elastic over a wide temperature range (-30 • C to +70 • C); • Adhere well to base and ensure good bond with the protective or wearing courses (in the case of one-layer surfacing systems); • Be resistant to mechanical damage and the working temperatures of asphalt mixture used for the protective layer (at least 160-240 • C).
The waterproofing layer should be at least 5 mm thick in the case of sheet materials and at least 2 mm thick in the case of coatings.
Torch-on membranes are the most popular deck waterproofing material used on the bridges in Poland [18]. However, torch-on membranes involve certain risks, related, inter alia to their application (bonding to the base in particular) and the process of placing of mastic asphalt to the protective course. These risks include [19][20][21]: • Burning through the membrane during application (the temperature of burned gasses during heating up the underside of the membrane with a gas torch can reach from about 700 • C to as much as 1400 • C) ( Figure 2). The waterproofing layer is an important part of the bridge surfacing system and should [15][16][17]: • Be impervious to water, water vapor and gases; • Be resistant to the action of chemicals related to operation and maintenance of roads; • Have smooth surface to facilitate drainage of water from the surface and reinforcing fleece embedded in the binder (if designed); • Be made of materials whose coefficient of thermal expansion is similar to that of the bridge deck, • Be elastic over a wide temperature range (-30 °C to +70 °C); • Adhere well to base and ensure good bond with the protective or wearing courses (in the case of one-layer surfacing systems); • Be resistant to mechanical damage and the working temperatures of asphalt mixture used for the protective layer (at least 160-240 °C).
The waterproofing layer should be at least 5 mm thick in the case of sheet materials and at least 2 mm thick in the case of coatings.
Torch-on membranes are the most popular deck waterproofing material used on the bridges in Poland [18]. However, torch-on membranes involve certain risks, related, inter alia to their application (bonding to the base in particular) and the process of placing of mastic asphalt to the protective course. These risks include [19][20][21]: • Burning through the membrane during application (the temperature of burned gasses during heating up the underside of the membrane with a gas torch can reach from about 700 °C to as much as 1400 °C) ( Figure 2). • Forming of bulges during placement of the protective layer due to local lack of adhesion between the membrane and substrate and the increase in partial pressure of air in the voids.

•
Destruction of membrane (structural degradation).  • Forming of bulges during placement of the protective layer due to local lack of adhesion between the membrane and substrate and the increase in partial pressure of air in the voids.
Spray applied polymer based compounds, such as methyl methacrylate, are increasingly used for the waterproofing of bridge decks.
The wearing course on bridges (in accordance with WT-2:2014 [22] manual) is most often made of asphalt concrete (AC), mastic asphalt (MA), stone mastic asphalt (SMA) and asphalt mixtures of discontinuous grading (BBTM). The requirements for these courses are the same as for the pavement structure outside the bridge.
In the Polish design manuals [22] mastic asphalt MA is the only material allowed for placement of protective layers. Mastic asphalt is widely used worldwide [23,24]. These mixtures were developed at the beginning of the 20th century almost simultaneously in England and France [25]. In Europe, MA mixtures are designed on the basis of the standard EN 13108-6 [26]. The strength parameters of these mixtures depend primarily on a very high viscosity (cohesion) of the mastic part (mixture of the bituminous binder, filler and fine sand). Hard penetration grade bitumens (20/30, 35/50) featuring low penetration and high viscosity (cohesion) are often used in order to increase cohesion of the bitumen mastic in the service temperature range. The disadvantage of this option is that mastic asphalt can be prone to low-temperature cracking. For this reason, for over a dozen years polymer-modified bitumens have been increasingly used for production of mastic asphalts, owing to their higher resistance to this phenomenon (soft base bitumens). On the other hand, asphalts of this kind are sensitive to high temperatures (over 180-190 • C) due to the risk of polymer degradation [23]. For this reason, viscosity-reducing additives are added to polymer-modified bitumens (such as FT waxes, Montana waxes, etc.) [27].
Besides undisputable advantages (self-compaction, tightness, long service life), mastic asphalt mixtures also have some disadvantages, including the following [28][29][30][31][32]: • Special pavers and vehicles are needed, which due to a relatively low availability and low throughput of this kind of plant considerably extends the process of construction, in relation to the projects where conventional asphalt mixtures are used; • High temperatures during production of mastic asphalt have a negative impact on the natural environment and increase the risk of overheating the bitumen; • Use of a layer of mastic asphalt may lead to cracking (longitudinal and transverse) and de-bonding of layers as a result of shrinkage, especially when there are considerable temperature differences of ambient air and longitudinal joint construction is applied because full-width working is not possible (Figures 3 and 4); • It is not possible to check the composition of MA mixtures immediately after production due to, inter alia, a lack of filler heating systems in asphalt mixing plants.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 17 Spray applied polymer based compounds, such as methyl methacrylate, are increasingly used for the waterproofing of bridge decks.
The wearing course on bridges (in accordance with WT-2:2014 [22] manual) is most often made of asphalt concrete (AC), mastic asphalt (MA), stone mastic asphalt (SMA) and asphalt mixtures of discontinuous grading (BBTM). The requirements for these courses are the same as for the pavement structure outside the bridge.
In the Polish design manuals [22] mastic asphalt MA is the only material allowed for placement of protective layers. Mastic asphalt is widely used worldwide [23,24]. These mixtures were developed at the beginning of the 20th century almost simultaneously in England and France [25]. In Europe, MA mixtures are designed on the basis of the standard EN 13108-6 [26]. The strength parameters of these mixtures depend primarily on a very high viscosity (cohesion) of the mastic part (mixture of the bituminous binder, filler and fine sand). Hard penetration grade bitumens (20/30, 35/50) featuring low penetration and high viscosity (cohesion) are often used in order to increase cohesion of the bitumen mastic in the service temperature range. The disadvantage of this option is that mastic asphalt can be prone to low-temperature cracking. For this reason, for over a dozen years polymermodified bitumens have been increasingly used for production of mastic asphalts, owing to their higher resistance to this phenomenon (soft base bitumens). On the other hand, asphalts of this kind are sensitive to high temperatures (over 180-190 °C) due to the risk of polymer degradation [23]. For this reason, viscosity-reducing additives are added to polymer-modified bitumens (such as FT waxes, Montana waxes, etc.) [27].
Besides undisputable advantages (self-compaction, tightness, long service life), mastic asphalt mixtures also have some disadvantages, including the following [28][29][30][31][32]: • Special pavers and vehicles are needed, which due to a relatively low availability and low throughput of this kind of plant considerably extends the process of construction, in relation to the projects where conventional asphalt mixtures are used; • High temperatures during production of mastic asphalt have a negative impact on the natural environment and increase the risk of overheating the bitumen; • Use of a layer of mastic asphalt may lead to cracking (longitudinal and transverse) and debonding of layers as a result of shrinkage, especially when there are considerable temperature differences of ambient air and longitudinal joint construction is applied because full-width working is not possible (Figures 3 and 4); • It is not possible to check the composition of MA mixtures immediately after production due to, inter alia, a lack of filler heating systems in asphalt mixing plants.  The high temperature during placement of mastic asphalt increases the risk of blistering [34] on the placed layer due to the rise of pressure in the voids and poor adhesion between the base and the torch-on membrane waterproofing layer [35,36]. The primary effect of the high temperature is the increase in water vapor pressure and, to a small extent, also the dry air pressure. Large increases in water vapor pressure are noticeable above 100 °C [28] ( Figure 5).

Innovative SMA-MA Mixtures-Brief History, General Information
In the 1990s, a research project was conducted at the Szczecin University of Technology concerning the application of a new mixture, which was expected to ensure functionality and durability of pavements used on bridges [37]. Concepts of stone mastic asphalt with an increased amount of bituminous binder and filler (SMA-MA) date back to that time [38]. These mixtures should The high temperature during placement of mastic asphalt increases the risk of blistering [34] on the placed layer due to the rise of pressure in the voids and poor adhesion between the base and the torch-on membrane waterproofing layer [35,36]. The primary effect of the high temperature is the increase in water vapor pressure and, to a small extent, also the dry air pressure. Large increases in water vapor pressure are noticeable above 100 • C [28] ( Figure 5). The high temperature during placement of mastic asphalt increases the risk of blistering [34] on the placed layer due to the rise of pressure in the voids and poor adhesion between the base and the torch-on membrane waterproofing layer [35,36]. The primary effect of the high temperature is the increase in water vapor pressure and, to a small extent, also the dry air pressure. Large increases in water vapor pressure are noticeable above 100 °C [28] (Figure 5).

Innovative SMA-MA Mixtures-Brief History, General Information
In the 1990s, a research project was conducted at the Szczecin University of Technology concerning the application of a new mixture, which was expected to ensure functionality and durability of pavements used on bridges [37]. Concepts of stone mastic asphalt with an increased amount of bituminous binder and filler (SMA-MA) date back to that time [38]. These mixtures should

Innovative SMA-MA Mixtures-Brief History, General Information
In the 1990s, a research project was conducted at the Szczecin University of Technology concerning the application of a new mixture, which was expected to ensure functionality and durability of pavements used on bridges [37]. Concepts of stone mastic asphalt with an increased amount of bituminous binder and filler (SMA-MA) date back to that time [38]. These mixtures should be treated as a development of the German technology developed in 1960s/1970s. Stosch [39] proposed five Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6958 5 of 17 typical pavement structures designed for bridges with a steel plate deck. For the protective layer, which simultaneously functioned as the waterproofing layer, Stosch proposed, inter alia, a layer of asphalt mastic laid on a special bonding coat, protecting the deck plate from corrosion ( Figure 6).
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 17 be treated as a development of the German technology developed in 1960s/1970s. Stosch [39] proposed five typical pavement structures designed for bridges with a steel plate deck. For the protective layer, which simultaneously functioned as the waterproofing layer, Stosch proposed, inter alia, a layer of asphalt mastic laid on a special bonding coat, protecting the deck plate from corrosion ( Figure 6). Bitumen mastic designed for waterproofing applications is composed of about 14-16% of bituminous binder, filler and sand. It features very good waterproofing properties but lacks resistance to permanent deformations. For this reason, 8/12 mm chippings were added to increase resistance to viscoplastic deformations caused by vehicle wheels.
The level of vehicle loading on pavements has considerably increased. As a result, the design used in the 1960s/1970s can lead to permanent deformations, most undesirable in the case of bridges, taking into account safety and major traffic disturbance during repair works. SMA-MA mixtures can provide a satisfactory solution to this problem. The main technical advantages of innovative SMA-MA mixtures include, but are not limited to, the following [38,40]: • Placement by conventional asphalt pavers; • The range of working temperatures does not depart much from the temperatures typically used in the case of asphalt concrete or SMA mixtures (lower by 40-60 °C than the temperatures used for mastic asphalts); • Lower risk of overheating the binder during lay-down; • High tightness of the layer; • Fatigue resistance owing to an increased content of medium penetration bitumen (mainly modified).
SMA-MA mixtures combine the advantages of bitumen mastic, mastic asphalt and SMA mixtures. In this way, we obtain a watertight and elastic material, which, in addition features a resistance to permanent deformations [38,41] and has good rheological parameters, especially at low temperatures [42]. Mixtures of this kind, owing to a large proportion of chippings, enable introduction to the binder (and thus to its mixture with aggregate) of larger amounts of polymer. A larger amount of polymer improves the elastic properties of the layer, reducing the effect of tensile and shear stresses caused by the temperature variation and traffic [37]. The recommended thickness of layers ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 cm (4.0 cm is acceptable) with the recommended grading of 5 mm or 8 mm (in exceptional situations grading of up to 11 mm is acceptable).
In Poland, SMA-MA mixtures have been, so far, used primarily in the West Pomerania province [28]. Attempts were also made to apply this technology on the Grota Roweckiego bridge in Warsaw but the project was discontinued due to the concerns of the Building Control Office [43]. One of the first successful implementations was the renewal of the Cłowy bridge in Szczecin in 1998 [37,44]. Instead of the conventional torch-on membrane, a spray-applied 2-3-mm-thick layer of paving-grade bitumen was applied as the bridge deck waterproofing. It was protected with a SMA mixture with an increased content of 50/70 paving-grade bitumen and low void content (about 0.5%). The layer Bitumen mastic designed for waterproofing applications is composed of about 14-16% of bituminous binder, filler and sand. It features very good waterproofing properties but lacks resistance to permanent deformations. For this reason, 8/12 mm chippings were added to increase resistance to viscoplastic deformations caused by vehicle wheels.
The level of vehicle loading on pavements has considerably increased. As a result, the design used in the 1960s/1970s can lead to permanent deformations, most undesirable in the case of bridges, taking into account safety and major traffic disturbance during repair works. SMA-MA mixtures can provide a satisfactory solution to this problem. The main technical advantages of innovative SMA-MA mixtures include, but are not limited to, the following [38,40]: • Placement by conventional asphalt pavers; • The range of working temperatures does not depart much from the temperatures typically used in the case of asphalt concrete or SMA mixtures (lower by 40-60 • C than the temperatures used for mastic asphalts); • Lower risk of overheating the binder during lay-down; • High tightness of the layer; • Fatigue resistance owing to an increased content of medium penetration bitumen (mainly modified).
SMA-MA mixtures combine the advantages of bitumen mastic, mastic asphalt and SMA mixtures. In this way, we obtain a watertight and elastic material, which, in addition features a resistance to permanent deformations [38,41] and has good rheological parameters, especially at low temperatures [42]. Mixtures of this kind, owing to a large proportion of chippings, enable introduction to the binder (and thus to its mixture with aggregate) of larger amounts of polymer. A larger amount of polymer improves the elastic properties of the layer, reducing the effect of tensile and shear stresses caused by the temperature variation and traffic [37]. The recommended thickness of layers ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 cm (4.0 cm is acceptable) with the recommended grading of 5 mm or 8 mm (in exceptional situations grading of up to 11 mm is acceptable).
In Poland, SMA-MA mixtures have been, so far, used primarily in the West Pomerania province [28]. Attempts were also made to apply this technology on the Grota Roweckiego bridge in Warsaw but the project was discontinued due to the concerns of the Building Control Office [43]. One of the first successful implementations was the renewal of the Cłowy bridge in Szczecin in 1998 [37,44]. Instead of the conventional torch-on membrane, a spray-applied 2-3-mm-thick layer of paving-grade bitumen was applied as the bridge deck waterproofing. It was protected with a SMA mixture with an increased content of 50/70 paving-grade bitumen and low void content (about 0.5%). The layer was 2 cm thick ( Figure 7). The mixture contained about 70% of chippings. Bitumen in the mixture was modified with carboxylated styrene butadiene latex which had stabilizing effect, i.e., reduced drainage of binder from the aggregate particles. The SMA layer was compacted until binder appeared on the surface. Upon placement, the SMA layer provided protection to the bituminous coating (with bonding and waterproofing functions). Due to relatively large irregularities of the deck slab and the need to obtain adequate transverse profile a regulating course was placed, made of asphalt concrete mixture containing max. 12.8 mm aggregate. The surfacing (wearing course) was a 4-cm-thick asphalt concrete layer (also with max. 12.8 mm aggregate). The total thickness of all the pavement courses was 10 cm. This pavement was successfully used until 2017 when the bridge was taken down due to a failure of a span (due to damaged deck pre-stressing elements).
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 17 was 2 cm thick ( Figure 7). The mixture contained about 70% of chippings. Bitumen in the mixture was modified with carboxylated styrene butadiene latex which had stabilizing effect, i.e., reduced drainage of binder from the aggregate particles. The SMA layer was compacted until binder appeared on the surface. Upon placement, the SMA layer provided protection to the bituminous coating (with bonding and waterproofing functions). Due to relatively large irregularities of the deck slab and the need to obtain adequate transverse profile a regulating course was placed, made of asphalt concrete mixture containing max. 12.8 mm aggregate. The surfacing (wearing course) was a 4-cm-thick asphalt concrete layer (also with max. 12.8 mm aggregate). The total thickness of all the pavement courses was 10 cm. This pavement was successfully used until 2017 when the bridge was taken down due to a failure of a span (due to damaged deck pre-stressing elements).  Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 17 was 2 cm thick ( Figure 7). The mixture contained about 70% of chippings. Bitumen in the mixture was modified with carboxylated styrene butadiene latex which had stabilizing effect, i.e., reduced drainage of binder from the aggregate particles. The SMA layer was compacted until binder appeared on the surface. Upon placement, the SMA layer provided protection to the bituminous coating (with bonding and waterproofing functions). Due to relatively large irregularities of the deck slab and the need to obtain adequate transverse profile a regulating course was placed, made of asphalt concrete mixture containing max. 12.8 mm aggregate. The surfacing (wearing course) was a 4-cm-thick asphalt concrete layer (also with max. 12.8 mm aggregate). The total thickness of all the pavement courses was 10 cm. This pavement was successfully used until 2017 when the bridge was taken down due to a failure of a span (due to damaged deck pre-stressing elements).

Bridge Description
One of the bigger projects completed in the recent years in which SMA-MA mixture was used was the renewal of the Trasa Zamkowa arterial thoroughfare linking the parts of Szczecin divided by the Odra river. In the period of 2017-2018 the city-bound road underwent a comprehensive renewal.

Bridge Description
One of the bigger projects completed in the recent years in which SMA-MA mixture was used was the renewal of the Trasa Zamkowa arterial thoroughfare linking the parts of Szczecin divided by the Odra river. In the period of 2017-2018 the city-bound road underwent a comprehensive renewal.

Bridge Description
One of the bigger projects completed in the recent years in which SMA-MA mixture was used was the renewal of the Trasa Zamkowa arterial thoroughfare linking the parts of Szczecin divided by the Odra river. In the period of 2017-2018 the city-bound road underwent a comprehensive renewal. This city-bound road runs over two river bridges over the Odra and the Parnica and an overpass over Łasztownia island [45] (Figure 11). Renewal of the asphalt pavement was one of the elements of the project. Constructed in 1987, after 30 years of operation the pavement was in a very bad condition and required a comprehensive renewal. The original structure of pavement comprised one layer of typical bitumen mastic and two layers of asphalt concrete mixture with 11 mm max. aggregate size. SMA-MA mixture was chosen as the best option upon considering the scope of work and a lack of possibility to close the road to traffic for a longer period of time. The scope of the asphalt paving work comprised construction of pavement with 3-4 travel lanes over a 1818-m-long section of the road.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 This city-bound road runs over two river bridges over the Odra and the Parnica and an overpass over Łasztownia island [45] (Figure 11). Renewal of the asphalt pavement was one of the elements of the project. Constructed in 1987, after 30 years of operation the pavement was in a very bad condition and required a comprehensive renewal. The original structure of pavement comprised one layer of typical bitumen mastic and two layers of asphalt concrete mixture with 11 mm max. aggregate size. SMA-MA mixture was chosen as the best option upon considering the scope of work and a lack of possibility to close the road to traffic for a longer period of time. The scope of the asphalt paving work comprised construction of pavement with 3-4 travel lanes over a 1818-m-long section of the road. The designed pavement is composed of three bituminous layers laid down on a waterproofing layer of liquid methyl methacrylate resin, spray applied on a prepared base (Figures 12 and 13).The waterproofing layer is protected with a about 2.5-3.0 cm thick layer of SMA-MA 8 mixture. The bridge deck gradeline was regulated with a 3.0-cm to 6.0-cm-thick layer of AC 11 S Polymer Modified Bitumen (PMB) 45/80-65 asphalt concrete mixture for wearing course. The wearing course of this pavement was made of a standard SMA 11 PMB 45/80-65 stone mastic asphalt mixture. The wearing course was 4 cm thick.  The designed pavement is composed of three bituminous layers laid down on a waterproofing layer of liquid methyl methacrylate resin, spray applied on a prepared base (Figures 12 and 13). The waterproofing layer is protected with a about 2.5-3.0 cm thick layer of SMA-MA 8 mixture. The bridge deck gradeline was regulated with a 3.0-cm to 6.0-cm-thick layer of AC 11 S Polymer Modified Bitumen (PMB) 45/80-65 asphalt concrete mixture for wearing course. The wearing course of this pavement was made of a standard SMA 11 PMB 45/80-65 stone mastic asphalt mixture. The wearing course was 4 cm thick.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 This city-bound road runs over two river bridges over the Odra and the Parnica and an overpass over Łasztownia island [45] (Figure 11). Renewal of the asphalt pavement was one of the elements of the project. Constructed in 1987, after 30 years of operation the pavement was in a very bad condition and required a comprehensive renewal. The original structure of pavement comprised one layer of typical bitumen mastic and two layers of asphalt concrete mixture with 11 mm max. aggregate size. SMA-MA mixture was chosen as the best option upon considering the scope of work and a lack of possibility to close the road to traffic for a longer period of time. The scope of the asphalt paving work comprised construction of pavement with 3-4 travel lanes over a 1818-m-long section of the road. The designed pavement is composed of three bituminous layers laid down on a waterproofing layer of liquid methyl methacrylate resin, spray applied on a prepared base (Figures 12 and 13).The waterproofing layer is protected with a about 2.5-3.0 cm thick layer of SMA-MA 8 mixture. The bridge deck gradeline was regulated with a 3.0-cm to 6.0-cm-thick layer of AC 11 S Polymer Modified Bitumen (PMB) 45/80-65 asphalt concrete mixture for wearing course. The wearing course of this pavement was made of a standard SMA 11 PMB 45/80-65 stone mastic asphalt mixture. The wearing course was 4 cm thick.

SMA-MA Protective Layer
The protective layer was made of SMA-MA 8 mixture. The binder for the protective layer made of SMA-MA 8 mixture was chosen based on the properties of the bitumen and the mixture in which it was used, including low-temperature performance in particular. Three bitumens were considered: The obtained properties of bitumens are compiled in Table 1.  The obtained properties of bitumens are compiled in Table 1. The Penetration index Ip was calculated from Equation (1), on the basis of the penetration values at 5 • C and 25 • C. The results from the tests of bituminous binders show that polymer-modified bitumens will be more appropriate for the production of SMA-MA mixtures. Based on the values of low-temperature stiffness S(T)-16, cracking resistance T(S)60 and stress relaxation ability T(m)60 polymer-modified bitumen PMB 65/105-60 was chosen. The elastic properties of both these modified bitumens and their rheological type are at a similar level. The parameters of 50/70 unmodified bitumen are worse, in particular in terms of low-temperature cracking.

Pavement Lay-Down Process
The SMA-MA 8 protective layer was laid down by conventional asphalt pavers. The works were carried out in stages (lane by lane) to avoid road closure. The placed layer was compacted by steel rollers until bitumen mastic appeared on the surface (Figures 15 and 16).
The SMA-MA 8 protective layer was laid down by conventional asphalt pavers. The works were carried out in stages (lane by lane) to avoid road closure. The placed layer was compacted by steel rollers until bitumen mastic appeared on the surface (Figures 15 and 16).   The SMA-MA 8 protective layer was laid down by conventional asphalt pavers. The works were carried out in stages (lane by lane) to avoid road closure. The placed layer was compacted by steel rollers until bitumen mastic appeared on the surface (Figures 15 and 16).   The placement of the AC 11 S protective course and SMA 11 wearing course is displayed in Figures 17 and 18.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 17 The placement of the AC 11 S protective course and SMA 11 wearing course is displayed in Figures 17 and 18.  The condition of pavement on the Trasa Zamkowa bridge two years after renewal is presented in Figure 19.  The condition of pavement on the Trasa Zamkowa bridge two years after renewal is presented in Figure 19. The condition of pavement on the Trasa Zamkowa bridge two years after renewal is presented in Figure 19.