Preparation, Sinterability, Electrical Transport and Thermal Expansion of Perovskite-Type La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 Composites

: Perovskite-type was synthesized by two methods, the combustion method and conventional solid state reaction (SSR) method. The effect of synthesis methods on sinterability and physical properties of the ceramic were investigated. The results show that there are advantages of the combustion method in producing doped lanthanum chromites. Compared with the SSR method, the combustion method reduces the sintering temperature of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 , elevates the electronic conductivity and thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) of the ceramic, due to optimizing the microstructure. At the same densities level (–93%), the specimen synthesized by the combustion method reaches a superior electrical conductivity of 31.6 S · cm -1 and a compatible TEC of 10.7 × 10 − 6 K − 1 at 800 ◦ C. by a combustion method in comparison with the high temperature solid state reaction (SSR) method, and investigated the inﬂuence of preparation methods on sinterability, electrical transport and thermal expansion of the ceramics.


Introduction
Lanthanum chromite (LaCrO 3 )-based perovskite phases possess high melting points, large electronic conductivity and stability in high-temperature reducing and oxidizing atmospheres, which makes them promising candidates for heating elements of muffle furnaces and current-conducting electrodes in magneto-hydrodynamics, especially interconnectors of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFCs) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The interconnections of SOFCs have a dual function of separating reducing and oxidizing gases and providing a short-circuit current between individual cells. Therefore, the interconnection of SOFCs must be tight. Nevertheless, LaCrO 3 is difficult to sinter to high densities in air, due to appreciable volatilization loss of chromium oxide at high temperatures in oxidizing atmospheres [7][8][9]. Therefore, a considerable amount of research effort has been performed on improving the sintering properties of the ceramic materials [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], and the results have been demonstrated the advantage of alkaline earth metal (AE = Ca, Sr) substituted LaCrO 3 , due to a transient liquid phase (e.g., CaCrO 4 and SrCrO 4 ) formed in the early stage of sintering and suppressing the vaporization of Cr-O species to some extent [10][11][12]. However, the application of excess AE substituted LaCrO 3 may lead to the long-term operation stability of the system [13,14].
It is well known that the sinterability of the ceramics could be enhanced by highly reactive powders synthesized by wet chemical methods. Moreover, physical properties of the ceramics, such as electrical transport and thermal expansion, may be affected by the characteristics of the powders synthesized by the methods, possibly due to different microstructures of the sintered ceramics. In this work, we synthesized La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 powders by a combustion method in comparison with the high temperature solid state reaction (SSR) method, and investigated the influence of preparation methods on sinterability, electrical transport and thermal expansion of the ceramics.

Materials
All chemical reagents were of AR grades and were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Factory of China without further purification. Distilled water was used in all solutions. La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 powder was synthesized by a combustion method, using metal nitrates as oxidizers and glycine as a fuel. Reagent grade La(NO 3 ) 3 ·6H 2 O, Ca(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O, Cr(NO 3 ) 3 ·9H 2 O and glycine were used as starting materials. Moreover, the details of the technique of the combustion method for obtaining La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 powders of submicron size particles have been described elsewhere [15,16]. The resultant powders were pressed into rectangular bars (30 × 4 × 4 mm 3 ), and then sintered at 1200-1450 • C for 4 h in air. In addition, La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 was also synthesized by the high temperature SSR method using La 2 O 3 , Cr 2 O 3 and CaO as raw materials. Then the specimen sintered at 1300-1550 • C for 4 h in air.

Characterization
The crystalline structure of the synthesized powders was investigated by an X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα X-ray radiation source and a Bragg diffraction setup (SMART LAB, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The morphology of the synthesized powders and the fractured cross sections of sintered specimens etched in diluted hybrid acids were characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-4800-II, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Relative densities of the sintered ceramics were determined from the apparent density values measured by the Archimedes method and the theoretical density calculated from the lattice parameter of the solid solution. The ceramic specimens were polished to ensure surface flatness and painted with platinum paste for measuring electrical conductivity. The electrical conductivity was then measured at 25 • C-800 • C by a direct current four-terminal method in air. Thermal expansion of the polished bars specimens was tested using a dilatometer (NETZSCH DIL402C, NETZSCH, Selb, Germany) with a heating rate of 5 • C·min −1 from 25 • C to 800 • C in air.  Figure 1a. The samples were synthesized by both combustion and SSR methods. It can be seen that an almost single perovskite phase was obtained for the powders by the combustion method. However, the sample by the SSR method displayed a stronger intensity of a perovskite phase with a little amount of CaCrO 4 and Cr 2 O 3 . The stronger diffraction peaks of the perovskite may have been due to a higher synthesis temperature. Moreover, a slight amount of CaCrO 4 as a second phase could redissolve the perovskite matrix above 1000 • C and Cr 2 O 3 was considered as incomplete reaction impurity substance. Figure 1b,c shows the SEM micrographs of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 powders synthesized by the two methods. The powder by the combustion method consisted of homogeneous, fine submicron particles (0.1-0.2 µm) estimated from the SEM micrographs.

XRD and
The above results exhibit the advantage of the combustion method in synthesizing La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 powders. It may be ascribed to that the combustion method could complex metal ions by means of the organic agent and release a relatively large volume of heat and gases, matching a number of the particular characteristics such as high purity, high surface area and hard agglomerate-free [10,17]. All the advantages could help the La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 ceramics possess superior sinterability and physical properties. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 8  Figure 2 shows the relative densities of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 ceramics synthesized by the two different methods, as a function of sintering temperature. It is clear from the above figure that at approximately 1400 °C, a higher relative density value of 93% was obtained for the combustion method samples, whereas in the case of the sample synthesized by the SSR method, the densification started at the same temperature and a relative density value of 90% was not achieved until 1500 °C. In contrast, the La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 powders synthesized by the combustion exhibit better sinterability, due to finer particle morphology and high sintering activity. The above-mentioned results were also supported by the microstructural variations observed on the sintered samples.    Figure 2 shows the relative densities of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 ceramics synthesized by the two different methods, as a function of sintering temperature. It is clear from the above figure that at approximately 1400 • C, a higher relative density value of 93% was obtained for the combustion method samples, whereas in the case of the sample synthesized by the SSR method, the densification started at the same temperature and a relative density value of 90% was not achieved until 1500 • C. In contrast, the La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 powders synthesized by the combustion exhibit better sinterability, due to finer particle morphology and high sintering activity. The above-mentioned results were also supported by the microstructural variations observed on the sintered samples.  Figure 2 shows the relative densities of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 ceramics synthesized by the two different methods, as a function of sintering temperature. It is clear from the above figure that at approximately 1400 °C, a higher relative density value of 93% was obtained for the combustion method samples, whereas in the case of the sample synthesized by the SSR method, the densification started at the same temperature and a relative density value of 90% was not achieved until 1500 °C. In contrast, the La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 powders synthesized by the combustion exhibit better sinterability, due to finer particle morphology and high sintering activity. The above-mentioned results were also supported by the microstructural variations observed on the sintered samples.  Figure 3 shows SEM micrographs of fracture surfaces of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 ceramics synthesized by the combustion and SSR methods as a function of the sintering temperature. It can be seen that a  Figure 3 shows SEM micrographs of fracture surfaces of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 ceramics synthesized by the combustion and SSR methods as a function of the sintering temperature. It can be seen that a close-grained microstructure was obtained for the combustion method sample sintered at 1400 • C in Figure 3a. While the SSR sample sintered at the same temperature displayed a porous microstructure with small grain size in Figure 3b. Despite the compact microstructure, Figure 3c showed many small holes on the surface of grains of the ceramics made by the high temperature SSR method and sintered at 1500 • C, likely due to volatilization of chromium oxide in higher temperature in air. It is well known that under oxidizing conditions at high temperature, the gaseous chromium oxides are easily produced, which hold back sintering of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 and lead to small holes on the microstructure, which is moreover likely to impair transport of electronic carriers of the materials.

Sintering Characterization
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 8 close-grained microstructure was obtained for the combustion method sample sintered at 1400 °C in Figure 3a. While the SSR sample sintered at the same temperature displayed a porous microstructure with small grain size in Figure 3b. Despite the compact microstructure, Figure 3c showed many small holes on the surface of grains of the ceramics made by the high temperature SSR method and sintered at 1500 °C, likely due to volatilization of chromium oxide in higher temperature in air. It is well known that under oxidizing conditions at high temperature, the gaseous chromium oxides are easily produced, which hold back sintering of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 and lead to small holes on the microstructure, which is moreover likely to impair transport of electronic carriers of the materials. Compared with that synthesized by the SSR method, the combustion method exhibited good sinterability and markedly lowered the temperature to densify La0.8Ca0.2CrO3, due to finer particle morphology and higher sintering activity. Furthermore, the decrease of sintering temperature optimized the microstructure of the ceramic and would improve physical properties.  Figure 4 shows the plots of lnσeT versus 1000/T for La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 ceramics synthesized by the different methods (where σe is the electrical conductivity and T is the absolute temperature). The relative densities of the two specimens were generally the same, an adequate density value of about 93%. It was found that La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 synthesized by the combustion method displayed a higher electrical conductivity of 31.6 S·cm −1 at 800 °C, while only 11.33 S·cm −1 for that by the SSR method. In addition, although the two specimen curves are not very linear, they are very close to linear, which indicates that small polaron-hopping is the main mechanism of conductivity behavior, as shown in the following equation [18,19]:

Electrical Transport
where C is a material constant containing the carrier concentration term, T is the absolute temperature, Ea is the activation energy for small polaron-hopping and K is the Boltzmann constant. Compared with that synthesized by the SSR method, the combustion method exhibited good sinterability and markedly lowered the temperature to densify La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 , due to finer particle morphology and higher sintering activity. Furthermore, the decrease of sintering temperature optimized the microstructure of the ceramic and would improve physical properties. Figure 4 shows the plots of lnσ e T versus 1000/T for La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 ceramics synthesized by the different methods (where σ e is the electrical conductivity and T is the absolute temperature). The relative densities of the two specimens were generally the same, an adequate density value of about 93%. It was found that La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 synthesized by the combustion method displayed a higher electrical conductivity of 31.6 S·cm −1 at 800 • C, while only 11.33 S·cm −1 for that by the SSR method. In addition, although the two specimen curves are not very linear, they are very close to linear, which indicates that small polaron-hopping is the main mechanism of conductivity behavior, as shown in the following equation [18,19]:

Electrical Transport
where C is a material constant containing the carrier concentration term, T is the absolute temperature, E a is the activation energy for small polaron-hopping and K is the Boltzmann constant. Moreover, the activation energies of small polarons hopping were calculated from the linear fit of the plots, 0.136 eV for the combustion method while 0.172 eV for the SSR methods samples. However, the difference in energy activation is not very large, a significant difference in conductivity can be observed.
ceramics. Generally speaking, the electronic conduction of the lanthanum chromates is essentially a bulk electronic transport property. Grain boundaries and holes can be considered as inhomogeneous components in ceramics, which hinder the transport of electron carriers. As a result, it is considered that the microstructure of the ceramics prepared by combustion method is the main reason for its excellent conductivity On the grain surfaces of the ceramic, it can be found that the grain sizes of the ceramic prepared by the SSR method are obviously smaller, implying the existence of more grain boundaries in this material. In general, the electronic conduction of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 is essentially a kind of bulk electrical transport property. The grain boundaries and holes can be regarded as heterogeneous components in the ceramic bulk, which block the transport of electronic carriers. Therefore, the desired microstructure of the ceramic made by the combustion method is mainly assumed to be responsible for its superior electronic conducting properties.  Figure 5 shows the thermal expansion behavior of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 ceramics synthesized by the two methods. The relative densities are approximately 93%. It can be seen that-under the same density level conditions-the relative expansion (ΔL/L) of the ceramic synthesized by the combustion method was evidently higher compared with that of the specimen by the SSR method. It is likely attributed to the different microstructures for the two methods. As inhomogeneous components in the ceramic bulk, perhaps the more grain boundaries and holes would reduce the relative expansion of the materials. Another possible mechanism may be the compositional difference because of volatilization of chromium oxide. In order to achieve the sufficient density of the perovskites, a higher sintering temperature (≥ 1500 °C) would be required for the SSR method. The excellent conductivity for the combustion method sample is probably related to its microstructure. The grain growth appeared perfectly straight along the boundary, and a clear grain boundary was observed (Figure 3a). However, in examining Figure 3c-in addition to several holes on the surface of ceramics grains-the grains size of ceramics prepared by high temperature solid state method is obviously smaller. It shows that there are more discontinuous grain boundaries in ceramics. Generally speaking, the electronic conduction of the lanthanum chromates is essentially a bulk electronic transport property. Grain boundaries and holes can be considered as inhomogeneous components in ceramics, which hinder the transport of electron carriers. As a result, it is considered that the microstructure of the ceramics prepared by combustion method is the main reason for its excellent conductivity On the grain surfaces of the ceramic, it can be found that the grain sizes of the ceramic prepared by the SSR method are obviously smaller, implying the existence of more grain boundaries in this material. In general, the electronic conduction of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 is essentially a kind of bulk electrical transport property. The grain boundaries and holes can be regarded as heterogeneous components in the ceramic bulk, which block the transport of electronic carriers. Therefore, the desired microstructure of the ceramic made by the combustion method is mainly assumed to be responsible for its superior electronic conducting properties. Figure 5 shows the thermal expansion behavior of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 ceramics synthesized by the two methods. The relative densities are approximately 93%. It can be seen that-under the same density level conditions-the relative expansion (∆L/L) of the ceramic synthesized by the combustion method was evidently higher compared with that of the specimen by the SSR method. It is likely attributed to the different microstructures for the two methods. As inhomogeneous components in the ceramic bulk, perhaps the more grain boundaries and holes would reduce the relative expansion of the materials. Another possible mechanism may be the compositional difference because of volatilization of chromium oxide. In order to achieve the sufficient density of the perovskites, a higher sintering temperature (≥ 1500 • C) would be required for the SSR method. The higher sintering temperature Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4634 6 of 8 results in volatilization of chromium oxide and the formation of more quadrivalent chromium ions in the perovskites structure (as for the ionic radii, Cr 4+ = 0.069 nm, Cr 3+ = 0.0755 nm) [20], and lower the TEC of the sample synthesized by SSR method.

Thermal Expansion
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 8 The higher sintering temperature results in volatilization of chromium oxide and the formation of more quadrivalent chromium ions in the perovskites structure (as for the ionic radii, Cr 4+ = 0.069 nm, Cr 3+ = 0.0755 nm) [20], and lower the TEC of the sample synthesized by SSR method. In addition, there is a kink in the measuring temperature range from 300 °C to 400 °C, which may be owing to the orthorhombic to rhombic phase-transition, in agreement with Sakai et al. [21] and Hayashi et al. [22], and confirmed by Gupta et al. [23] using the DSC and high temperature XRD results. The thermal expansion coefficients (TECs) of the two samples prepared by different methods were 10.5 × 10 −6 K −1 and 9.6 × 10 −6 K −1 in high temperature, respectively. Obviously, the former was thermally compatible with that of other high-temperature components for use in SOFC, such as 8YSZ electrolyte (10.5 × 10 −6 K −1 ), so as to minimize thermal stresses. All the above results demonstrated that the discrepancies in the electrical conductivity and TEC corresponded well to the microstructural variations of the ceramics, due to the different sinterability of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 synthesized by the two methods. By contrast, the specimen by the combustion method exhibits lower densified temperature and better physical properties. Present research work provided new clue for the synthesis of new composites and nanomaterials [24][25][26][27][28][29].

Conclusions
In summary, the sinterability, electrical transport and thermal expansion of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 synthesized by the combustion method were studied and compared with that of synthesized by the high temperature SSR method. It was found that the combustion method could effectively enhance the sinterability of La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 ceramic and reduce the sintering temperature of the materials because of higher sintering active powders. Moreover, lower sintering temperature optimized the microstructure of the ceramic and would elevate the electrical conductivity and TEC. The combustion method was proved to be a favorable synthesis process for La0.8Ca0.2CrO3 complex oxides.   In addition, there is a kink in the measuring temperature range from 300 • C to 400 • C, which may be owing to the orthorhombic to rhombic phase-transition, in agreement with Sakai et al. [21] and Hayashi et al. [22], and confirmed by Gupta et al. [23] using the DSC and high temperature XRD results. The thermal expansion coefficients (TECs) of the two samples prepared by different methods were 10.5 × 10 −6 K −1 and 9.6 × 10 −6 K −1 in high temperature, respectively. Obviously, the former was thermally compatible with that of other high-temperature components for use in SOFC, such as 8YSZ electrolyte (10.5 × 10 −6 K −1 ), so as to minimize thermal stresses. All the above results demonstrated that the discrepancies in the electrical conductivity and TEC corresponded well to the microstructural variations of the ceramics, due to the different sinterability of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 synthesized by the two methods. By contrast, the specimen by the combustion method exhibits lower densified temperature and better physical properties. Present research work provided new clue for the synthesis of new composites and nanomaterials [24][25][26][27][28][29].

Conclusions
In summary, the sinterability, electrical transport and thermal expansion of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 synthesized by the combustion method were studied and compared with that of synthesized by the high temperature SSR method. It was found that the combustion method could effectively enhance the sinterability of La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 ceramic and reduce the sintering temperature of the materials because of higher sintering active powders. Moreover, lower sintering temperature optimized the microstructure of the ceramic and would elevate the electrical conductivity and TEC. The combustion method was proved to be a favorable synthesis process for La 0.8 Ca 0.2 CrO 3 complex oxides.