Total and Bioaccessible Soil Arsenic and Lead Levels and Plant Uptake in Three Urban Community Gardens in Puerto Rico

Arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) are two contaminants of concern associated with urban gardening. In Puerto Rico, data currently is limited on As and Pb levels in urban garden soils, soil metal (loid) bioaccessibility, and uptake of As and Pb in soil by edible plants grown in the region. This study examined total and bioaccessible soil As and Pb concentrations and accumulation in 10 commonly grown garden plants collected from three urban community gardens in Puerto Rico. Bioavailability values were predicted using bioaccessibility data to compare site-specific bioavailability estimates to commonly used default exposure assumptions. Total and bioaccessible As levels in study soils ranged from 2 to 55 mg/kg and 1 to 18 mg/kg, respectively. Total and bioaccessible Pb levels ranged from 19 to 172 mg/kg and 17 to 97 mg/kg, respectively. Measured bioaccessibility values corresponded to 19% to 42% bioaccessible As and 61% to 100% bioaccessible Pb when expressed as a percent of total As and Pb respectively. Predicted relative percent bioavailability of soil As and Pb based on measured bioaccessibility values ranged from 18% to 36% and 51% to 85% for As and Pb respectively. Transfer factors (TFs) measuring uptake of As in plants from soil ranged from 0 to 0.073 in the edible flesh (fruit or vegetable) of plant tissues analyzed and 0.073 to 0.444 in edible leaves. Pb TFs ranged from 0.002 to 0.012 in flesh and 0.023 to 0.204 in leaves. Consistent with TF values, leaves accumulated higher concentrations of As and Pb than the flesh, with the highest tissue concentrations observed in the culantro leaf (3.2 mg/kg dw of As and 8.9 mg/kg dw of Pb). Leaves showed a general but not statistically-significant (α = 0.05) trend of increased As and Pb concentration with increased soil levels, while no trend was observed for flesh tissues. These findings provide critical data that can improve accuracy and reduce uncertainty when conducting site-specific risk determination of potential As and Pb exposure while gardening or consuming garden produce in the understudied region of Puerto Rico.


Introduction
Urban gardening, a growing trend in urban communities, is defined as the process of growing plants in an urban setting for consumption.However, this type of gardening poses the potential for contamination from historical site use and environmental history.The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) recommends steps to follow when developing urban garden sites, including sampling and testing the soil for contaminants [1].Arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) are two potential contaminants of concern in urban gardens.As can originate from the underlying parent material or from anthropogenic additions from agriculture or industrial inputs [2].Pb sources can include agricultural use of Pb arsenicals to control pests, Pb paint deposition, and air pollution deposition [3].
Direct oral ingestion of contaminated soil and consumption of plants that have accumulated As or Pb from underlying soil have been identified as exposure pathways of concern in urban garden soils that contain elevated levels of contaminants, including metals and metalloids (hereafter referred to collectively as metals) [1].Human health risk assessments of toxic metals in soils based on total soil metal concentration can overpredict actual risk because only some percentage of metals in soil are in a form that will be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract upon ingestion [4].This is referred to as the bioavailable fraction.In vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) assays that measure dissolution of metals from soil in a gastric like environment are commonly used as a reliable and cost effective estimate of soil metal bioavailability [5].Therefore, metrics important in characterizing the potential for human exposure to toxic metals from urban gardens include total soil metal concentration, soil metal bioavailability/bioaccessibility, and edible plant tissue concentrations.
IVBA assays are an important tool for assessing potential human oral exposures from contaminated soil via the direct ingestion exposure pathway to determine the metal concentration available for absorption in the gastrointestinal tract [4,5].These assays measure the solubility of As or Pb in a solution that simulates the human gastrointestinal tract and are used as a reliable estimate of relative bioavailability (RBA) tests that measure the fraction of ingested metal absorbed across the gastrointestinal barrier in vivo [4].IVBA assays are an attractive alternative to directly measuring RBA in vivo due to their lower cost, higher throughput, and reduced reliance on animal testing.Understanding the relationship between As and Pb concentrations in soil and uptake by plants is also critical for characterizing potential exposure to these metals in urban gardens from consumption of edible plants.
Previous studies characterizing contaminant levels in urban garden produce have been conducted in regions throughout the world, including the United States [6,7], Great Britain [8][9][10], and China [11].However, published research is limited on soil and plant As and Pb levels in the Caribbean region, including the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico.Because of regional and cultural differences in foods grown and consumed in urban gardens in different parts of the world, additional data are needed for understudied regions.
In this study, the total and bioaccessible fractions of As and Pb in garden soils and plant tissue concentrations sampled from three urban community gardens in Puerto Rico were measured to identify potential exposure concerns related to human health in local communities.RBA values were predicted based on measured IVBA values to compare site-specific bioavailability data to default bioavailability assumptions used in exposure and risk assessment.Differences in uptake by edible plants grown in the region were also investigated.Specifically, garden plant tissues analyzed were categorized as either leaf (such as lettuces and herbs) or flesh (fruits or vegetables), and differences in uptake between categories were explored based on calculated transfer factors (TFs), defined as the ratio of As or Pb concentration in the plant relative to the soil concentration.Ten garden plants (representing nine unique plant species) typical of those grown in urban gardens in Puerto Rico were investigated.These results add to the existing knowledge base for characterizing potential exposure to As and Pb from urban gardens, and provide important site-specific metal exposure information to local community members.

Site Descriptions
The soil and plant samples for this study were collected from three urban community garden sites in the Martin Peña District of San Juan, Puerto Rico, shown in Figure 1.The three garden sites are located in the region demarcated by the black border, but the exact locations are not disclosed to preserve the anonymity of these communities.The area is urbanized, with a river outlet splitting the district.Two of the sites originally were empty urban lots that were converted into gardens to improve the community's access to healthy food.The third garden site was created in 2012 as part of a school cooperative program.The Martin Peña District has a population of 26,000, an unemployment rate of 22%, and approximately 53% of its inhabitants live in poverty.

Site Descriptions
The soil and plant samples for this study were collected from three urban community garden sites in the Martin Peña District of San Juan, Puerto Rico, shown in Figure 1.The three garden sites are located in the region demarcated by the black border, but the exact locations are not disclosed to preserve the anonymity of these communities.The area is urbanized, with a river outlet splitting the district.Two of the sites originally were empty urban lots that were converted into gardens to improve the community's access to healthy food.The third garden site was created in 2012 as part of a school cooperative program.The Martin Peña District has a population of 26,000, an unemployment rate of 22%, and approximately 53% of its inhabitants live in poverty.[12] of area surrounding Martin Peña District of Puerto Rico, with the three urban community gardens located in the region in the black border.

Plant and Soil Sample Collection
Soil and plant tissue samples were collected from each of the three gardens and analyzed at a USEPA laboratory in Research Triangle Park, NC.Plants at each site were grown in raised beds with defined perimeters (such as concrete blocks or wooden boards), car tires filled with soil, or soil spread into a four-inch mound above grade (Figure 2).
Soil samples were collected from the top one-to-two inches of soil around each plant in accordance with USEPA guidance on sample collection for soil metal bioaccessibility determination [13].A minimum of 100 grams (g) of soil was collected per sample.Five discrete soil samples were collected from each garden.A composite soil sample was also collected from each garden, which, in addition to the areas around individual garden plants analyzed in this study, included soil samples collected (randomly) from other areas of the gardens, for a total of 18 soil samples.
Samples of the edible portions of plants were also collected from each garden.Collected plants generally had shallow root systems (less than two inches deep).Therefore, soil below two inches in depth was not collected for this study.Plant samples were placed into labeled plastic bags and shipped to the USEPA laboratory for analysis.The USEPA laboratory analyzed only plant samples with sufficient mass (greater than 0.45 g on a dry weight (dw) basis), resulting in 10 garden plants samples being analyzed for this study.Samples consisted of the leaves of basil (from two unique basil plants), culantro, lettuce, and pumpkin plants and the flesh portions of avocado, tomato, sweet pepper, eggplant, and yucca fruits.Due to the season in which plant samples were collected, only the leaf of the pumpkin plant was available for sampling; the fruit had not yet developed.Pumpkin leaves are not commonly consumed in the United States or Puerto Rico, but inhabitants of some

Plant and Soil Sample Collection
Soil and plant tissue samples were collected from each of the three gardens and analyzed at a USEPA laboratory in Research Triangle Park, NC.Plants at each site were grown in raised beds with defined perimeters (such as concrete blocks or wooden boards), car tires filled with soil, or soil spread into a four-inch mound above grade (Figure 2).
Soil samples were collected from the top one-to-two inches of soil around each plant in accordance with USEPA guidance on sample collection for soil metal bioaccessibility determination [13].A minimum of 100 grams (g) of soil was collected per sample.Five discrete soil samples were collected from each garden.A composite soil sample was also collected from each garden, which, in addition to the areas around individual garden plants analyzed in this study, included soil samples collected (randomly) from other areas of the gardens, for a total of 18 soil samples.
Samples of the edible portions of plants were also collected from each garden.Collected plants generally had shallow root systems (less than two inches deep).Therefore, soil below two inches in depth was not collected for this study.Plant samples were placed into labeled plastic bags and shipped to the USEPA laboratory for analysis.The USEPA laboratory analyzed only plant samples with sufficient mass (greater than 0.45 g on a dry weight (dw) basis), resulting in 10 garden plants samples being analyzed for this study.Samples consisted of the leaves of basil (from two unique basil plants), culantro, lettuce, and pumpkin plants and the flesh portions of avocado, tomato, sweet pepper, eggplant, and yucca fruits.Due to the season in which plant samples were collected, only the leaf of the pumpkin plant was available for sampling; the fruit had not yet developed.Pumpkin leaves are not commonly consumed in the United States or Puerto Rico, but inhabitants of some countries, including Malawi, Kenya, and some South Pacific countries, rely on the leaves as a source of nutrition [14][15][16].The pumpkin leaf was therefore included in this study.
countries, including Malawi, Kenya, and some South Pacific countries, rely on the leaves as a source of nutrition [14][15][16].The pumpkin leaf was therefore included in this study.

Soil Sample Processing and Physicochemical Characterization
At the USEPA laboratory, the 18 soil samples were placed in an oven and dried for about five days at less than 40 °C.A vibrating, 2-mm stainless-steel sieve removed large chunks of aggregate from the soil samples.Material remaining on the screen was disaggregated using a gloved hand and rescreened.The soil was sieved to less than 250 µm, the particle size fraction used for bioaccessibility testing [5].Sieved soil was passed through a riffler five times, and aliquots were collected in clean 250-mL high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles for analysis.Total soil element concentrations were determined in duplicate samples of each soil by digesting soils in accordance with USEPA Method 3051 using a MARS-5 microwave system (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA).Soil samples were analyzed in accordance with USEPA Method 6010 using an iCAP 6000 series inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-optical emission spectrometry (OES) instrument (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA).For pH analysis, 2 g of each soil was placed into 10 mL of water and shaken for 1 h [17].
The soil sample As and Pb concentrations were compared to human health soil screening levels (SSLs) [18,19].Pb soil concentrations were also compared to risk levels identified by a USEPA Technical Review Workgroup, which provided recommended guidelines to reduce lead exposure from gardening related activities based on soil Pb levels [20].

Soil Sample Processing and Physicochemical Characterization
At the USEPA laboratory, the 18 soil samples were placed in an oven and dried for about five days at less than 40 • C. A vibrating, 2-mm stainless-steel sieve removed large chunks of aggregate from the soil samples.Material remaining on the screen was disaggregated using a gloved hand and rescreened.The soil was sieved to less than 250 µm, the particle size fraction used for bioaccessibility testing [5].Sieved soil was passed through a riffler five times, and aliquots were collected in clean 250-mL high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles for analysis.Total soil element concentrations were determined in duplicate samples of each soil by digesting soils in accordance with USEPA Method 3051 using a MARS-5 microwave system (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA).Soil samples were analyzed in accordance with USEPA Method 6010 using an iCAP 6000 series inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-optical emission spectrometry (OES) instrument (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA).For pH analysis, 2 g of each soil was placed into 10 mL of water and shaken for 1 h [17].
The soil sample As and Pb concentrations were compared to human health soil screening levels (SSLs) [18,19].Pb soil concentrations were also compared to risk levels identified by a USEPA Technical Review Workgroup, which provided recommended guidelines to reduce lead exposure from gardening related activities based on soil Pb levels [20].

Bioaccessibility Assays
Bioaccessibility of As and Pb in soil samples was determined in accordance with USEPA Method 9200.2-86.Synthetic stomach fluid (SSF) was prepared using deionized water amended with 0.4 molar (M) glycine (certified American Chemical Society grade) acidified to a pH of 1.5 using hydrochloric acid (HCl) (32% to 35% analytical grade) to mimic the high acidity environment in the stomach.Bioaccessibility assays were performed in duplicate for each soil and included the addition of 1 g of test soil to 100 mL SSF in a 125-mL HDPE bottle rotated end over end in a water bath at 37 • C for 1 h.Extracted solutions were refrigerated at 4 • C for preservation and subsequent analysis using ICP-mass spectrometry (MS) (USEPA Method 6020).
As and Pb bioaccessibility was calculated and expressed on a percentage basis using Equation (1).
As/Pb bioaccessibility (%) = where "in vitro As/Pb" was the As or Pb extracted during the in vitro assay and "total As/Pb" was the total amount of As or Pb in the soil used for bioaccessibility determination.
To compare site-specific metal bioavailability data from garden soils to default bioavailability assumptions that may be used when developing SSLs or conducting risk assessments at metal contaminated sites, in vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) values were converted to relative bioavailability (RBA) predictions using validated linear models for As and Pb.Specifically, Pb RBA was calculated based on USEPA Method 1340 [21] using Equation (2), and As RBA was calculated based on the linear model published by Diamond et al. [22] using Equation (3).

Plant Sample Processing and Physicochemical Characterization
At the USEPA laboratory, the plant samples were thoroughly rinsed with deionized water to remove residual soil, freeze-dried for 24 to 48 h, hand ground to powder, and acid digested using a MARS-5 microwave system (CEM Corporation) in accordance with USEPA Method 3052.Because only the edible portion of the plants were of interest, the avocado was peeled before freeze drying.Plant samples with sufficient mass were analyzed in duplicate, with metal concentrations reported as the average of the concentrations of the two duplicates.Plant samples without enough mass to allow duplicate analysis yielded results for a single analysis only.Plant digests were diluted and analyzed by USEPA Method 6020 using a Thermo Scientific X-Series II ICP-MS.Quality control (QC) samples included analysis of an acid blank, blank spike, and National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Material (NIST SRM) (NIST 2710A) with each microwave digestion batch.

Relationship of Soil As and Pb to Plant Uptake
Ten soil samples were paired with their associated (co-located) garden plant sample (nine plant types, including two basil plants collected from two gardens).The other eight soil samples either did not have a garden plant associated with them or the plant sample did not contain sufficient mass for analysis.Plant tissues were categorized as either leaf (basil, culantro, lettuce, and pumpkin leaf) or flesh (avocado, tomato, sweet pepper, eggplant, and yucca).Relationships between soil and plant tissue As and Pb concentrations were investigated, and transfer factors (TFs), also commonly referred to as uptake or concentration factor, were calculated to quantify the accumulation of As and Pb in plant tissues using Equation ( 4) [23].

Soil As and Pb Levels
Table 1 summarizes the soil total, measured bioaccessible, and predicted bioavailable As and Pb results for Gardens 1, 2, and 3.In the 18 soil samples analyzed, As total soil concentrations ranged from 2.0 to 55.4 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (mean = 9.0 mg/kg), and Pb concentrations ranged from 19.1 to 172.0 mg/kg (mean = 44.6 mg/kg).For reference, background As and Pb concentrations in soils sampled across the continental United States range from 0.1 to 97 and 2 to 300 mg/kg, respectively [2].Table 1 also presents the results for aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), and soil pH because these soil properties have been identified as influencing soil metal bioaccessibility [5,24,25].

Soil As and Pb Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability
Across the 18 soil samples, As IVBA ranged from 19% to 42%.Estimated RBA values, predicted based on measured IVBA values, ranged from 18% to 36%.Pb IVBA and RBA values ranged from 61% to 100% and 51% to 85% respectively (Table 1).Results for all associated quality control samples, including blanks, blank spikes, and NIST SRM 2710A standard reference material used to measure IVBA were within acceptable limits as defined by USEPA Method 9200.2-86.

Plant Uptake of As and Pb
Table 2 summarizes As and Pb concentrations in plant tissues collected from the three gardens, along with the paired soil concentrations and TFs.Detectable As and Pb levels were observed in every plant sample analyzed except for the tomato, which had As levels below the method reporting limit of 0.04 mg/kg dw.Plant tissue As concentrations ranged from less than 0.04 to 3.2 mg/kg dw.Pb concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 8.9 mg/kg dw.The highest concentrations for both As (3.2 mg/kg dw) and Pb (8.9 mg/kg dw) were observed in the culantro leaf.All associated QC samples analyzed were within acceptable limits (i.e., ±15% recovery of expected value or below method reporting limit for blanks).
Leafy plant tissues accumulated higher concentrations of As and Pb than the flesh of fruits and vegetables analyzed (Figure 3), with As TFs ranging from 0.073 to 0.444 and 0.000 to 0.073 for leaf and flesh plant tissues respectively.Pb TFs ranged from 0.058 to 0.204 and 0.002 to 0.012 for leaf and flesh plant tissues respectively.
Table 2 summarizes As and Pb concentrations in plant tissues collected from the three gardens, along with the paired soil concentrations and TFs.Detectable As and Pb levels were observed in every plant sample analyzed except for the tomato, which had As levels below the method reporting limit of 0.04 mg/kg dw.Plant tissue As concentrations ranged from less than 0.04 to 3.2 mg/kg dw.Pb concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 8.9 mg/kg dw.The highest concentrations for both As (3.2 mg/kg dw) and Pb (8.9 mg/kg dw) were observed in the culantro leaf.All associated QC samples analyzed were within acceptable limits (i.e., ±15% recovery of expected value or below method reporting limit for blanks).
Leafy plant tissues accumulated higher concentrations of As and Pb than the flesh of fruits and vegetables analyzed (Figure 3), with As TFs ranging from 0.073 to 0.444 and 0.000 to 0.073 for leaf and flesh plant tissues respectively.Pb TFs ranged from 0.058 to 0.204 and 0.002 to 0.012 for leaf and flesh plant tissues respectively.

Discussion
Human health SSLs for As in the United States based on the direct soil ingestion exposure pathway vary by state or region and generally range from 0.04 to 40 mg/kg, which corresponds to a 1 in 1 million to 1 in 10,000 incremental cancer risk [18].SSLs are not remediation levels but rather guidelines to help determine if sites or portions of sites require further investigation.One soil sample from Garden 1 contained As at 55.4 mg/kg, exceeding the highest aforementioned SSL of 40 mg/kg.Other soils had As concentrations above some state-specific SSLs.However, As concentrations in these soils were closer to typical background levels of As in soil.
The USEPA has established 400 mg/kg as the human health SSL for Pb based on the direct soil ingestion exposure pathway, assuming a default RBA of 60% [19,26].Residential areas with soil Pb concentrations below 400 mg/kg may require no additional action.However, some actions may be needed in gardens containing soil Pb concentrations below 400 mg/kg to reduce the potential for increased Pb exposure [20].According to recommended guidelines regarding gardening, soil Pb levels under 100 mg/kg are considered low risk, with no additional action needed [20].Most of the garden soil samples evaluated for Pb in this study were below this level.However, two soil samples from Garden 1 contained Pb at concentrations exceeding 100 mg/kg (131 mg and 172 mg/kg).
All garden soils evaluated in this study had As RBA values (predicted based of measured IVBA values) at or below 36%.Observed site-specific RBA values suggest exposure risk from oral ingestion of As from these garden soils would be less than that determined under scenarios where bioavailability data is not considered or a default RBA value of 60% [27] is used.Pb RBA values in study soils ranged from 51% to 85%, with the two soil samples that contained Pb above 100 mg/kg having predicted RBA values of 62% and 66%, slightly above the default assumption of 60% used in development of screening levels of Pb contaminated soils.Because even small changes in bioavailability values used in risk determination can have significant impacts on calculated risk [4], the use of site-specific data rather than default assumptions can improve the accuracy of human health risk assessments of metal contaminated soils.While the in vitro bioaccessibility assay used in this study, which uses a stomach phase only, has been demonstrated as a reliable predictor of As [28,29] and Pb RBA [21], it should be noted that alternative in vitro bioaccessibility assays that use a two-phase system (gastric and intestinal phase) may result in differences in measured bioaccessibility or predicted RBA.
For garden soils that exceed As or Pb levels determined to be low risk for exposure, the USEPA recommends (1) decreasing the planting of root vegetables; (2) relocating plants to lower risk areas; (3) increasing soil amendments and barriers to reduce soil deposition onto leafy vegetables; (4) wearing gloves to reduce contact with and potential ingestion of soil; and (5) planting vegetables that are not in direct contact with the soil (such as fruit trees) [20].
While SSLs are typically based on the direct soil ingestion exposure pathway, consideration of the soil-plant-human exposure pathway may also be important to accurately characterize exposure to toxic metals in urban gardens, especially for As [30].Consistent with previous research [31,32], plant TF data indicated that the garden plants in this study tended to concentrate As from soils in tissues more heavily than Pb across the range of observed soil As and Pb concentrations, with As TFs averaging 0.105 compared to an average Pb TF of 0.056.The higher concentrations of Pb than As in plant tissues observed in this study, therefore, were likely a result of the higher total Pb concentrations in the garden soils as compared to As, averaging 30.3 and 6.9 mg/kg for soil Pb and As respectively.
Also consistent with previous research [31,33,34], leaf tissues concentrated As and Pb more heavily than the flesh of plants, with As TFs averaging 0.204 and 0.022 for leaf and flesh tissues respectively, and Pb TFs averaging 0.117 and 0.005 for leaf and flesh tissues.Higher tissue concentrations in leafy plant tissues may be due to leafy plants and herbs propensity to grow at faster rates and have higher transpiration rates than non-leaf plants [35].Foliar metal uptake in leaves may also contribute to higher leaf tissue metal concentrations [36].A general, albeit not statistically-significant (α = 0.05), trend of increased Pb and As concentration in leaf tissues was observed with increasing total soil metal concentration, while no such trend was observed for flesh plant tissues (Figure 3).Culantro, in the Apiaceae family, had the highest TF of the plant samples in our study.Other studies have found similarly high uptake and concentration of metals, including As and Pb, in cilantro, a plant similar to culantro also in the Apiaceae family, and other herbs compared to other garden plant types [37][38][39].To our knowledge, TFs for culantro have not been previously reported in the literature.
While beyond the scope of this study, additional factors should be considered when determining exposure risk from consumption of garden plants.For example, while TFs were generally higher for leaf plant tissues than flesh, the amount of each food typically consumed should also be considered when determining exposure risk.Additionally, adherence of contaminated soil onto plant tissue can also contribute to exposure through handling or consumption of unwashed plants [20].
Because site-specific exposure data, including soil metal bioavailability/bioaccessibility and plant uptake, may differ from default assumptions, consideration of such data can improve accuracy and reduce in risk determination from potential exposure to As, Pb, or other toxic metals from urban gardening related activities.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Satellite image [12] of area surrounding Martin Peña District of Puerto Rico, with the three urban community gardens located in the region in the black border.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Satellite image [12] of area surrounding Martin Peña District of Puerto Rico, with the three urban community gardens located in the region in the black border.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Examples of raised beds from the urban community gardens evaluated in this study.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Examples of raised beds from the urban community gardens evaluated in this study.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Relationship between soil As and Pb concentration and uptake in plant tissues categorized as leaf or flesh.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Relationship between soil As and Pb concentration and uptake in plant tissues categorized as leaf or flesh.

Table 1 .
Total bioaccessible and bioavailable As and Pb in study soils and additional soil properties of interest.

Table 2 .
Paired plant and soil As and Pb concentrations with associated TFs.Plant concentrations reported on a dry weight basis.