Strategies for Advanced Production: A Review of the Use of AI in the Dairy Industry
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Dairy Production Industry
3. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Animal Health and Fitness Estimation
4. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Dairy Production Yield
5. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Milk Quality and Safety
6. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Improving the Quality and Sensory Experience of Dairy Products
7. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Dairy Databases
8. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the Estimation of the Environmental Impact of Dairy Products
9. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Demand Prediction of Dairy Products
10. Critical Barriers to Widespread Adoption
11. Perspectives and Challenges
12. Discussion on the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Dairy Industry
13. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Neehalika Bavya, S.P.; Bashapaka, B.; Reddy, G.S. An Empirical Study on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human Capital Management. Int. Res. J. Adv. Eng. Manag. 2024, 2, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boden, M.A. Artificial Intelligence: A Very Short Introduction; Oxford Academic: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, T.; Sasano, T. Artificial Intelligence and Cardiology: Current Status and Perspective. J. Cardiol. 2022, 79, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coulson, R.N.; Folse, L.J.; Loh, D.K. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Resource Management. Science 1987, 237, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbai, C.M. Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Food Industry. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 13, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brock, J.K.U.; von Wangenheim, F. Demystifying Ai: What Digital Transformation Leaders Can Teach You about Realistic Artificial Intelligence. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2019, 61, 110–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udenkwo, J.T.C. Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Socioeconomic Development. In Handbook of Research on Connecting Philosophy, Media, and Development in Developing Countries; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 267–275. [Google Scholar]
- García-Méndez, S.; De Arriba-Pérez, F.; Del Carmen Somoza-López, M. Informatics and Dairy Industry Coalition: Artificial Intelligence Trends and Present Challenges. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2024, 18, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, N.; Qi, J.; An, X.; Wang, Y. A Review on Information Technologies Applicable to Precision Dairy Farming: Focus on Behavior, Health Monitoring, and the Precise Feeding of Dairy Cows. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Z.; Chang, F.; Jia, Y.; Li, J.; Qiu, Y.; Miao, J.; Jiang, W.; Guo, X.; Han, X.; Tang, W. Classifying and Understanding of Dairy Cattle Health Using Wearable Inertial Sensors with Random Forest and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2024, 8, 6001804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siachos, N.; Neary, J.M.; Smith, R.F.; Oikonomou, G. Automated Dairy Cattle Lameness Detection Utilizing the Power of Artificial Intelligence; Current Status Quo and Future Research Opportunities. Vet. J. 2024, 304, 106091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Vries, M.; Wouters, B. Characteristics of Small-Scale Dairy Farms in Lembang, West-Java; Wageningen Livestock Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Neethirajan, S. Net Zero Dairy Farming—Advancing Climate Goals with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Climate 2024, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsaedi, A.W.M.; Al-Hilphy, A.R.; Al-Mousawi, A.J.; Gavahian, M. Artificial Intelligence-based Modeling of Novel Non-thermal Milk Pasteurization to Achieve Desirable Color and Predict Quality Parameters during Storage. J. Food Process Eng. 2024, 47, e14658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mhapsekar, R.U.; Abraham, L.; O’Shea, N.; Davy, S. Edge-AI Implementation for Milk Adulteration Detection. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (GCAIoT), New Almain City, Egypt, 18–21 December 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 108–113. [Google Scholar]
- Monteiro, H.F.; Figueiredo, C.C.; Mion, B.; Santos, J.E.P.; Bisinotto, R.S.; Peñagaricano, F.; Ribeiro, E.S.; Marinho, M.N.; Zimpel, R.; da Silva, A.C.; et al. An Artificial Intelligence Approach of Feature Engineering and Ensemble Methods Depicts the Rumen Microbiome Contribution to Feed Efficiency in Dairy Cows. Anim. Microbiome 2024, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karouani, Y.; Elgarej, M. Milk-Run Collection Monitoring System Using the Internet of Things Based on Swarm Intelligence. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain. Manag. 2022, 15, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zedda, L.; Perniciano, A.; Loddo, A.; Di Ruberto, C. Understanding Cheese Ripeness: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach for Hierarchical Classification. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2024, 295, 111833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, K.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, C.; Qiu, T. Consumer-Oriented Sensory Optimization of Yogurt: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Food Control 2022, 138, 108995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oztuna Taner, O.; Çolak, A.B. Dairy Factory Milk Product Processing and Sustainable of the Shelf-Life Extension with Artificial Intelligence: A Model Study. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1344370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vries, A.; Bliznyuk, N.; Pinedo, P. Invited Review: Examples and Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Dairy Farms. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2023, 39, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valergakis, G.E.; Arsenos, G.; Banos, G. Comparison of Artificial Insemination and Natural Service Cost Effectiveness in Dairy Cattle. Animal 2007, 1, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. AI-Driven Climate Neutrality in Dairy Farming: Benchmarking Emissions for Sustainable Transformation. Preprint 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dara, R.; Hazrati Fard, S.M.; Kaur, J. Recommendations for Ethical and Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Agriculture. Front. Artif. Intell. 2022, 5, 884192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nogoy, K.M.C.; Park, J.; Chon, S.-i.; Sivamani, S.; Park, M.J.; Cho, J.P.; Hong, H.K.; Lee, D.H.; Choi, S.H. Precision Detection of Real-Time Conditions of Dairy Cows Using an Advanced Artificial Intelligence Hub. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 12043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, V.A.; Lana, A.M.Q.; Bresolin, T.; Tomich, T.R.; Souza, G.M.; Furlong, J.; Rodrigues, J.P.P.; Coelho, S.G.; Gonçalves, L.C.; Silveira, J.A.G.; et al. Using Rumination and Activity Data for Early Detection of Anaplasmosis Disease in Dairy Heifer Calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 4421–4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, K.; Duan, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, Q.; Hong, X.; Zhang, R.; Wang, M. Detection of Respiratory Rate of Dairy Cows Based on Infrared Thermography and Deep Learning. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, E.A.; Jagusiak, W. The Use of Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Networks to Detect Dairy Cows at Risk of Ketosis. Animals 2022, 12, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mhapsekar, R.U.; O’Shea, N.; Davy, S.; Abraham, L. Hybrid Blended Deep Learning Approach for Milk Quality Analysis. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2024, 8, 2253–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragone, R.; Grasso, G.; Licciardi, G.; Di Stefano, D.; Frazzoli, C. Sensors Driven System Coupled with Artificial Intelligence for Quality Monitoring and HACCP in Dairy Production. Sens. Biosens. Res. 2024, 45, 100683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gülşen, M.; Aydın, B.; Gürer, G.; Yalçın, S.S. AI-ASSISTED Emotion Analysis during Complementary Feeding in Infants Aged 6–11 Months. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023, 166, 107482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, D.; Nassa, V.K.; Pandey, B.K.; Thankachan, B.; Dadheech, P.; Mahajan, D.A.; George, A.S. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning and Its Application in the Field of Computational Visual Analysis. In Emerging Engineering Technologies and Industrial Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 36–57. [Google Scholar]
- Koulaouzidis, G.; Jadczyk, T.; Iakovidis, D.K.; Koulaouzidis, A.; Bisnaire, M.; Charisopoulou, D. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology—A Narrative Review of Current Status. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górriz, J.M.; Álvarez-Illán, I.; Álvarez-Marquina, A.; Arco, J.E.; Atzmueller, M.; Ballarini, F.; Barakova, E.; Bologna, G.; Bonomini, P.; Castellanos-Dominguez, G.; et al. Computational Approaches to Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Theory, Applications and Trends. Inf. Fusion 2023, 100, 101945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kufel, J.; Bargieł-Łączek, K.; Kocot, S.; Koźlik, M.; Bartnikowska, W.; Janik, M.; Czogalik, Ł.; Dudek, P.; Magiera, M.; Lis, A.; et al. What Is Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning?—Examples of Practical Applications in Medicine. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlZubi, A.A.; Al-Zu’bi, M. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Monitoring of Animal Health and Welfare. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2023, 57, 1550–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, P.-K.; Mito, K.; Kim, T.H. The Evolving Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Animal Health. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2024, 58, 1793–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Guo, W.; Lv, C.; Guo, M.; Yang, M.; Fu, Q.; Liu, X. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence Technology for Improving Animal Welfare: Current Applications and Research Progress. Anim. Res. One Health 2024, 2, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitsunaga, T.M.; Nery Garcia, B.L.; Pereira, L.B.R.; Costa, Y.C.B.; da Silva, R.F.; Delbem, A.C.B.; dos Santos, M.V. Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence and Bovine Mastitis Research: A Bibliometric Review Approach. Animals 2024, 14, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, J.; Siddiqui, T.A.; Sheikh, M.I.; Waseem, M.S.; Nawaz, M.A.B.; Eldin, E.T.; Rehman, A.U. Deployment of an Intelligent and Secure Cattle Health Monitoring System. Egypt. Inform. J. 2023, 24, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagahara, M.; Tatemoto, S.; Ito, T.; Fujimoto, O.; Ono, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Takagi, M.; Otoi, T. Designing a Diagnostic Method to Predict the Optimal Artificial Insemination Timing in Cows Using Artificial Intelligence. Front. Anim. Sci. 2024, 5, 1399434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higaki, S.; Miura, R.; Suda, T.; Andersson, L.M.; Okada, H.; Zhang, Y.; Itoh, T.; Miwakeichi, F.; Yoshioka, K. Estrous Detection by Continuous Measurements of Vaginal Temperature and Conductivity with Supervised Machine Learning in Cattle. Theriogenology 2019, 123, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higaki, S.; Okada, H.; Suzuki, C.; Sakurai, R.; Suda, T.; Yoshioka, K. Estrus Detection in Tie-Stall Housed Cows through Supervised Machine Learning Using a Multimodal Tail-Attached Device. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 191, 106513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunassi, L.d.A.; de Moura, D.J.; Nääs, I.d.A.; Martinez do Vale, M.; de Souza, S.R.L.; Oliveira de Lima, K.A.; Ridolfi de Carvalho, T.M.; de Freitas Bueno, L.G. Detection of Dairy Cows’ Estrus Using Fuzzy Logic Improving Detection of Dairy Cow Estrus Using Fuzzy Logic. Sci. Agric. 2010, 67, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostopoulos, A.; Griffiths, B.E.; Siachos, N.; Neary, J.; Smith, R.F.; Oikonomou, G. Initial Validation of an Intelligent Video Surveillance System for Automatic Detection of Dairy Cattle Lameness. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1111057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siachos, N.; Lennox, M.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Griffiths, B.E.; Neary, J.M.; Smith, R.F.; Oikonomou, G. Development and Validation of a Fully Automated 2-Dimensional Imaging System Generating Body Condition Scores for Dairy Cows Using Machine Learning. J. Dairy Sci. 2024, 107, 2499–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temenos, A.; Voulodimos, A.; Korelidou, V.; Gelasakis, A.; Kalogeras, D.; Doulamis, A.; Doulamis, N. Goat-CNN: A Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for Pose-Independent Body Condition Score Estimation in Goats. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 16, 101174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arıkan, İ.; Ayav, T.; Seçkin, A.Ç.; Soygazi, F. Estrus Detection and Dairy Cow Identification with Cascade Deep Learning for Augmented Reality-Ready Livestock Farming. Sensors 2023, 23, 9795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, N.H.; Tran, V.T.; Dang, T.H.; Chung, W.Y. Radio Frequency Energy Harvesting-Based Self-Powered Dairy Cow Behavior Classification System. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 8776–8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koyama, K.; Koyama, T.; Sugimoto, M.; Kusakari, N.; Miura, R.; Yoshioka, K.; Hirako, M. Prediction of Calving Time in Holstein Dairy Cows by Monitoring the Ventral Tail Base Surface Temperature. Vet. J. 2018, 240, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikkola, M.; Desmet, K.L.J.; Kommisrud, E.; Riegler, M.A. Recent Advancements to Increase Success in Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Cattle. Anim. Reprod. 2024, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, D.; Kenéz, Á.; McArt, J.A.A.; Li, J. Transformer Neural Network to Predict and Interpret Pregnancy Loss from Activity Data in Holstein Dairy Cows. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 205, 107638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurras, F.; Jakob, M. Smart Dairy Farming—The Potential of the Automatic Monitoring of Dairy Cows’ Behaviour Using a 360-Degree Camera. Animals 2024, 14, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goli, A.; Moeini, E.; Shafiee, A.M.; Zamani, M.; Touti, E. Application of Improved Artificial Intelligence with Runner-Root Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Dairy Products Industry: A Case Study. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 2020, 29, 2050008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goli, A.; Khademi-Zare, H.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Sadeghieh, A.; Sasanian, M.; Malekalipour Kordestanizadeh, R. An Integrated Approach Based on Artificial Intelligence and Novel Meta-Heuristic Algorithms to Predict Demand for Dairy Products: A Case Study. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 2021, 32, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aharwal, B.; Roy, B.; Meshram, S.; Yadav, A. Worth of Artificial Intelligence in the Epoch of Modern Livestock Farming: A Review. Agric. Sci. Dig.—A Res. J. 2021, 43, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guevara, L.; Castro-Espinoza, F.; Fernandes, A.M.; Benaouda, M.; Muñoz-Benítez, A.L.; del Razo-Rodríguez, O.E.; Peláez-Acero, A.; Angeles-Hernandez, J.C. Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Describe the Characteristics of Dairy Sheep Lactation Curves. Animals 2023, 13, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadi, M.S.; Sugiono, B.S.R.; Mizar, M.A.; Witjoro, A.; Irvan, M. Enhancing Low-Temperature Long-Time Milk Pasteurization Process with a C4.5 Algorithm-Driven AIoT System for Real-Time Decision-Making. J. Food Process Eng. 2024, 47, e14606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John Martin, R.; Mittal, R.; Malik, V.; Jeribi, F.; Tabrez Siddiqui, S.; Alamgir Hossain, M.; Swapna, S.L. XAI-Powered Smart Agriculture Framework for Enhancing Food Productivity and Sustainability. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 168412–168427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, M.O.; Shahbaz Khan, M.S.; Ali, M.J.; Hussain, A.; Qaiser, G.; Pasha, M.; Pasha, U.; Missen, M.S.; Akhtar, N. IoT for Development of Smart Dairy Farming. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rane, N.L.; Mallick, S.K.; Kaya, Ö.; Rane, J. Applications of Deep Learning in Healthcare, Finance, Agriculture, Retail, Energy, Manufacturing, and Transportation: A Review. In Applied Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Architectures and Techniques; Deep Science Publishing: Gandhinagar, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Alsaedi, A.W.M.; Al-Hilphy, A.R.; Al-Mousawi, A.J.; Gavahian, M. Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Predict Electrical Conductivity and Moisture Content of Milk During Non-Thermal Pasteurization: New Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Food Processing. Processes 2024, 12, 2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, R.; Srivastava, A. Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Enhancing Operational Efficiency in Manufacturing Medical Devices. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2024, 4, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Santos, P.T.; Carrilho, S.M.; De Abreu, S.S.; De Lira, F.M.; Tanaka, F.Y.R.; Tamanini, R.; Rios, E.A.; Watanabe, L.S.; Fagnani, R.; Gonzaga, N. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lactose: Improving the Control of Industrial Processes. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2022, 43, 1637–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolba, A.; Mostafa, N.N.; Mohamed, A.W.; Sallam, K.M. Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Milk Quality Prediction. Precis. Livest. 2024, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yüksek, A.G.; Elik, A.; Altunay, N. Rapid and Safe Determination of Vitamin B1 in Dairy Products, Fruits, Nuts and Vitamin Tablets: Combination of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents, Experimental Design and Artificial Intelligence. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 131, 106222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durgun, M. Real-Time Milk Quality Control Using Multi-Spectral Sensing and Edge Computing: Advancing On-Site Detection of Milk Components with XGBoost. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samad, A.; Taze, S.; Kürsad Uçar, M. Enhancing Milk Quality Detection with Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of KNN and Distance-Weighted KNN Algorithms. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2024, 9, 2021–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Cao, C.; Yu, H.; Liu, Y. Design and Implementation of Dairy Food Tracking System Based on RFID. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), Limassol, Cyprus, 15–19 June 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 2199–2203. [Google Scholar]
- Soori, M.; Dastres, R.; Arezoo, B. AI-Powered Blockchain Technology in Industry 4.0, a Review. J. Econ. Technol. 2023, 1, 222–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Høyer, M.R.; Oluyisola, O.E.; Strandhagen, J.O.; Semini, M.G. Exploring the Challenges with Applying Tracking and Tracing Technology in the Dairy Industry. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019, 52, 1727–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loddo, A.; Di Ruberto, C.; Armano, G.; Manconi, A. Automatic Monitoring Cheese Ripeness Using Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 122612–122626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loddo, A.; Di Ruberto, C.; Armano, G.; Manconi, A. Detecting Coagulation Time in Cheese Making by Means of Computer Vision and Machine Learning Techniques. Comput. Ind. 2025, 164, 104173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzafilkou, K.; Economides, A.A.; Panavou, F.R. You Look like You’ll Buy It! Purchase Intent Prediction Based on Facially Detected Emotions in Social Media Campaigns for Food Products. Computers 2023, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Sun, B.; Ai, N. An Insight into Specific Flavor Sensation in Fermented Milk: Linalool and Mushroom Alcohol. J. Dairy Sci. 2025, 108, 5741–5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Wang, N.; Liu, C.; Jin, J. Effect of Silkworm Pupae Peptide on the Fermentation and Quality of Yogurt. J. Food Process Preserv. 2017, 41, e12893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farag, M.A.; Saleh, H.A.; El Ahmady, S.; Elmassry, M.M. Dissecting Yogurt: The Impact of Milk Types, Probiotics, and Selected Additives on Yogurt Quality. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 634–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz-Ersan, L.; Topcuoglu, E. Evaluation of Instrumental and Sensory Measurements Using Multivariate Analysis in Probiotic Yogurt Enriched with Almond Milk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabrera, V.E.; Fadul-Pacheco, L. Future of Dairy Farming from the Dairy Brain Perspective: Data Integration, Analytics, and Applications. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 121, 105069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakrashi, A.; Wallace, D.; Mac Namee, B.; Greene, D.; Guéret, C. CowMesh: A Data-Mesh Architecture to Unify Dairy Industry Data for Prediction and Monitoring. Front. Artif. Intell. 2023, 6, 1209507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, S.; Diaz, M.; Carmona-Duarte, C.; Vilar, J.M.; Ferrer, M.A. CowScreeningDB: A Public Benchmark Database for Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 216, 108500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, D.; Natta, D.; Mandal, S.; Ghosh, N. MOOnitor: An IoT Based Multi-Sensory Intelligent Device for Cattle Activity Monitoring. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2022, 333, 113271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genedy, R.A.; Ogejo, J.A. Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Liquid Dairy Manure Temperature during Storage. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 187, 106234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Chen, M.H.; Lai, G.W. Achieving Energy Savings through Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted Fault Detection and Diagnosis: Case Study on Refrigeration Systems. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2022, 40, 102499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassoun, A.; Tarchi, I.; Aït-Kaddour, A. Leveraging the Potential of Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies to Reduce and Valorize Waste and By-Products in the Dairy Sector. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2024, 47, 100927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, M.; Gupta, D.; Javed, Y.; Mohiuddin, K.; Juneja, S.; Khan, Z.I.; Nauman, A. Monitoring Root and Shoot Characteristics for the Sustainable Growth of Barley Using an IoT-Enabled Hydroponic System and AquaCrop Simulator. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radun, V.; Dokić, D.; Gantner, V. Implementing Artificial Intelligence as a Part of Precision Dairy Farming for Enabling Sustainable Dairy Farming. Ekon. Poljopr. 2021, 68, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Świderski, A.; Jóźwiak, A.; Jachimowski, R. Operational Quality Measures of Vehicles Applied for the Transport Services Evaluation Using Artificial Neural Networks. Eksploat. Niezawodn. 2018, 20, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, A.K. Development and Deployment of Green Artificial Intelligence. Int. J. Math. Comput. Res. 2023, 11, 3328–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vithitsoontorn, C.; Chongstitvatana, P. Demand Forecasting in Production Planning for Dairy Products Using Machine Learning and Statistical Method. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Khon Kaen, Thailand, 9–11 March 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, V.; Sharma, R.; Singhal, P. Demand Forecasting of Dairy Products for Amul Warehouses Using Neural Network. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2019, 7, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
- Doganis, P.; Alexandridis, A.; Patrinos, P.; Sarimveis, H. Time Series Sales Forecasting for Short Shelf-Life Food Products Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Evolutionary Computing. J. Food Eng. 2006, 75, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goli, A.; Zare, H.K.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Sadeghieh, A. An Improved Artificial Intelligence Based on Gray Wolf Optimization and Cultural Algorithm to Predict Demand for Dairy Products: A Case Study. Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 2019, 5, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albrecht, T.; Rausch, T.M.; Derra, N.D. Call Me Maybe: Methods and Practical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Call Center Arrivals’ Forecasting. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mediavilla, M.A.; Dietrich, F.; Palm, D. Review and Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Demand Forecasting in Supply Chain Management. Procedia CIRP 2022, 107, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heien, D.M.; Wessells, C.R. The Demand for Dairy Products: Structure, Prediction, and Decomposition. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1988, 70, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva Nogueira, T.; Siqueira, K.B.; Goliatt, P.V.Z.C. Construction of a Training Dataset for a Sentiment Analysis Model of Dairy Products Tweets in Brazil. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2024, 14, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Name | Algorithm Type | Area of Implementation | Results | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random Forest (RF) algorithm | ML (Machine learning) | Animal health | Early detection of mastitis using wearable sensors and behavioral analysis | Shi et al. [10] |
| ThinkDairy Data-Mining Hub | ML | Enhanced detection of heat stress and subclinical mastitis through K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) | Nogoy et al. [25] | |
| Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models | DL (Deep learning) | Predicted anaplasmosis onset 3–5 days before clinical symptoms appeared | Teixeira et al. [26] | |
| YOLO v8 for thermal imaging | DL | 94.58% accuracy in detecting dairy cow respiratory rates | Zhao et al. [27] | |
| SHAP Explainable AI (XAI) | Other (XAI) | Identified combined behavioral patterns linked to health issues | Shi et al. [10] | |
| Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) | DL | Detected subclinical ketosis in dairy cows, showcasing effectiveness in managing herd health | Bauer and Jagusiak [28] | |
| Regression Tree Models | ML | Nutrition and Feed Efficiency | Predicted impact of dietary interventions on milk composition and yield; improved resource utilization while maintaining milk quality | Monteiro et al. [16] |
| Back Propagation Neural Networks (BPNN) optimized with Genetic Algorithms (GA) | DL (BPNN)/Other (GA) | Milk production | Accurate prediction of milk yield based on environmental and physiological factors | Monteiro et al. [16] |
| Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) | DL | Milk quality | Achieved 98.03% accuracy in milk quality prediction | Mhapsekar et al. [29] |
| Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) | Other (Neuro-fuzzy) | Milk composition | Real-time prediction of milk moisture and fat content with high precision | Alsaedi et al. [14] |
| Edge-AI | DL | Milk adulteration detection | Achieved 94.87% accuracy in classifying adulterants using Fourier Transformed Infrared data | Mhapsekar et al. [15] |
| Biometric and Environmental Sensor Technology (BEST) | ML | Quality Monitoring & Safety | Enhanced milk sample categorization, supporting HACCP protocols | Dragone et al. [30] |
| Hybrid Machine Learning (Deep and Shallow Learning) | DL | Dairy derivatives | Automated ripeness detection in cheese with 99.10% accuracy | Zedda et al. [18] |
| MLP | DL | Environmental sustainability | Optimized factory productivity with near-perfect accuracy (R2 = 0.99984) | Oztuna Taner et al. [20] |
| Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) | Other (Optimization) | Logistics | Optimized milk collection routes, reducing emissions and costs | Karouani et al. [17] |
| Facial Action Coding System (FACS) | DL | Consumer preference | Evaluated infant responses to yogurt, guiding product development | Gülsen et al. [31] |
| Area of Application | Specific AI Technology | Task | Key Performance Metric | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Health | YOLO v8 (DL) | Respiratory rate detection | Accuracy | 94.58% | Zhao et al. [27] |
| Animal Health | Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) | Anaplasmosis prediction | Early Detection Lead Time | 3–5 days before clinical symptoms | Teixeira et al. [26] |
| Animal Health | Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) | Subclinical ketosis detection | Effectiveness | Successfully detected condition | Bauer and Jagusiak [28] |
| Milk Quality | CNNs + RNNs (HyBDL) | Milk Quality Analysis | Accuracy/Mean Squared Error (MSE) | 98.03% accuracy (with lower MSE) | Mhapsekar et al. [29] |
| Milk Quality | Edge-AI (CNN) | Milk adulteration detection | Accuracy | 94.87% | Mhapsekar et al. [15] |
| Dairy Derivatives | Hybrid ML (Deep & Shallow) | Cheese ripeness detection | Accuracy/F-measure | 99.10% accuracy (F-measure: 0.991) | Zedda et al. [18] |
| Production & Environment | Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) | Factory productivity prediction | Coefficient of Determination (R2) | R2 = 0.99984 (Near-perfect prediction) | Oztuna Taner et al. [20] |
| Logistics | Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) | Milk collection route optimization | Outcome | Reduced emissions and costs | Karouani et al. [17] |
| Demand Forecasting | MLP + Runner-Root Algorithm (RRA) | Dairy product demand prediction | Coefficient of Determination (R2) | R2 = 98.19% | Goli et al. [54] |
| Demand Forecasting | Statistical tests + MLP | Dairy product demand prediction | Error Reduction | Forecast errors reduced by 1.8 times | Goli et al. [55] |
| Model | Input Variables | Reported Performance | Application Scope | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPNN | Lactation stage, body weight, feed intake | Dry matter intake (standard variables + microbiome) R2 = 0.89; Milk fat efficiency (combined) R2 = 0.92; Milk protein efficiency (combined) R2 = 0.84 | Individual yield estimation | Monteiro et al. [16] |
| ACO-BPNN | Route data + herd production | Cost reduction by 18% | Farm logistics optimization | Karouani et al. [17] |
| Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) | Nine product types | R2: 0.99984, MSE: 4.02 × 10−6 | Factory productivity prediction | Oztuna Taner et al. [20] |
| Predictive analytics | Large historical datasets | Enhanced efficiency and production outcomes (does not specify dairy production) | Yield optimization through data-driven decisions | Martin et al. [59] |
| IoT & AI integration | Real-time sensor data | 84% reduction in transaction costs, increased milk production, and overall operational efficiency. | Smart dairy farming systems | Akbar et al. [60] |
| Deep Learning Models | Agricultural and livestock data | Efficient yield prediction and management (does not specify dairy production) | Automation and sustainable farming practices | Rane et al. [61] |
| Model | Analytical Target | Accuracy | Sample Type | Key Contribution | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANFIS | Fat and protein content | R2 = 0.93 | Raw milk | First fuzzy inference system for milk components | Alsaedi et al. [14] |
| CNN | Adulteration detection | 98.5% | NIR spectra | Non-destructive online testing | Mhapsekar et al. [15] |
| HyBDL | Bacterial contamination | 99.2% | UHT milk | Hybrid deep-learning framework | Mhapsekar et al. [29] |
| GRU-ResNet | Microbial safety classification | F1 = 0.97 | Pasteurized milk | Time-series–image fusion model | Tolba et al. [65] |
| XGBoost & Regression Models | Protein and fat content prediction | Not specified | Multi-spectral milk samples | Real-time quality control using multi-spectral sensing and edge computing | Durgun et al. [67] |
| Distance-Weighted KNN (DW-KNN) | Milk quality classification | 99.53% | Milk samples for quality detection | Significant improvement over standard KNN for high-precision classification | Samad et al. [68] |
| Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) | Factory productivity and shelf-life | R2 = 0.99984 | Factory production data | Enhanced processing efficiency and sustainable shelf-life extension | Taner and Çolak [20] |
| MLP Neural Networks | Milk sample categorization | Enhanced accuracy | Biometric and environmental sensor data | HACCP protocol support and traceability monitoring | Dragone et al. [30] |
| AI Technology | Task | Key Performance Metric | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid ML (Deep & Shallow) | Cheese ripeness detection | Accuracy/F-measure | 99.10% accuracy (F-measure: 0.991) | Zedda et al. [18] |
| Computer Vision + ML | Cheese ripening assessment | Classification Accuracy | 98% classification accuracy | Loddo et al. [72] |
| GA + PSO + SVM | Yogurt sensory optimization | Consumer Preference Alignment | Identified consumer-preferred sensory features | Bi et al. [19] |
| Facial Action Coding System (FACS) | Infant emotional response to yogurt | Emotion Analysis | Identified negative reactions (disgust, fear) in breastfed infants | Gülsen et al. [31] |
| Neural Networks (FaceReader) | Predict purchase intent from ads | Prediction Accuracy | 90–91% accuracy in predicting purchase intent | Tzafilkou et al. [74] |
| Computer Vision + Temporal Data | Curd cutting time determination | Process Optimization | Enabled immediate adjustments, enhancing consistency | Loddo et al. [73] |
| XGBoost Model | Real-time milk quality control using multi-spectral sensing and edge computing | R2 > 0.85 for protein and fat prediction | Enables rapid on-site detection and enhances milk quality control efficiency | Durgun (2024) [67] |
| K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) & Distance-Weighted KNN (DW-KNN) | Milk quality detection | Accuracy: 99.53% (DW-KNN) vs. 98.58% (KNN) | Distance weighting improves classification precision in milk quality assessment | Samad et al. [68] |
| Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) Artificial Neural Network | Productivity analysis in dairy factories | Process optimization and shelf-life extension | Models data input–output relationships to enhance processing sustainability | Taner & Çolak [20] |
| Flavor and Sensory Experience Enhancement (AI-assisted) | Identification of key flavor compounds in fermented milk | Odor Activity Value (OAV) | Identified linalool and mushroom alcohol as main aroma and off-flavor drivers | Chi et al. [75] |
| Functional Ingredient Optimization via AI Modeling | Silkworm pupae peptide effects on yogurt fermentation | Physicochemical and textural metrics | Improved firmness, cohesiveness, acidification profile, WHC; altered flavor balance | Wang et al. [76] |
| Dairy Product Processing Innovations (AI-integrated analysis) | Impact of milk types, probiotics, additives on yogurt quality | Physicochemical and sensory attributes | Improved flavor, gel stability, and consumer acceptance | Farag et al. [77] |
| Instrumental–Sensory Integration Models | Probiotic yogurt with almond milk: correlation of instrumental and sensory data | Color, texture, and sensory metrics | Multivariate analysis improved alignment between instrumental and sensory perception | Yilmaz-Ersan & Topcuoglu [78] |
| Database/System | Data Types Integrated | AI/ML Components | Key Application | Key Contribution | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CowMesh | Activity monitors, herd records, management systems, milking logs | ML algorithms for health prediction | Comprehensive farm management | Data-mesh architecture for unifying disparate dairy data sources | Pakrashi et al. [80] |
| CowScreeningDB | IMU sensor data, clinician lameness scores | Deep learning models | Lameness detection | Public multi-sensor database with FAIR principles for reproducible research | Ismail et al. [81] |
| MOOnitor | Temperature, GPS, accelerometer data | XGBoost, Random Forest | Activity classification and health monitoring | Integrated IoT device with 97% activity classification accuracy | Dutta et al. [86] |
| Dairy Brain Concept | Electronic health records, production data, environmental sensors | Predictive analytics | Farm optimization | Conceptual framework for integrated data analytics in dairy operations | Cabrera & Fadul-Pacheco [79] |
| Sustainability Database | Emissions data, energy usage, feed efficiency metrics | Big data analytics | Environmental impact assessment | Benchmarking standards for net-zero emissions tracking | Neethirajan et al. [13] |
| AI Technology | Task | Key Performance Metric | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI & Big Data Analytics (Conceptual) | GHG emissions reduction/Net-zero roadmap | Benchmarking/Transparency | Enables benchmarking and supply chain transparency | Neethirajan [13] |
| Fault Detection & Diagnosis (FDD) + Transfer Learning | Refrigeration system efficiency | Energy Savings | Improved energy efficiency, addressed data scarcity | Lee et al. [84] |
| Machine Learning Algorithms | Manure temperature prediction | Prediction Accuracy | Improved accuracy of temperature predictions for nutrient/emissions management | Genedy et al. [83] |
| Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) | Transport system optimization | Operational Efficiency/Cost | Reduced operational costs and emissions | Świderski et al. [88] |
| Industry 4.0 Tech (AI, IoT, Blockchain) | Waste reduction and traceability | Resource Efficiency/Quality | Improved traceability, reduced waste, optimized supply chains | Hassoun et al. [85] |
| AI Technology | Task | Key Performance Metric | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLP + Runner-Root Algorithm (RRA) | Dairy product demand prediction | Coefficient of Determination (R2) | R2 = 98.19% | Goli et al. [54] |
| Statistical tests + MLP + GWO/CA | Dairy product demand prediction | Error Reduction | Forecast errors reduced by 1.8 times | Goli et al. [93] |
| SVR + MLP + ANFIS + IWO/PSO | Dairy product demand prediction | Predictive Accuracy | Improved predictive accuracy vs. conventional methods | Goli et al. [55] |
| RBF Neural Networks + GA | Sales forecasting for short shelf-life products | Forecasting Accuracy | Outperformed traditional methods | Doganis et al. [92] |
| NLP + Data Balancing (SMOTE) | Sentiment analysis for dairy products | Model Performance/Classification | Improved model performance for consumer insight | da Silva Nogueira et al. [97] |
| LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) | Forecasting dairy product demand across 5 production plants | Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) < 1.0 for 36/40 series | Outperformed ARIMA in 28/40 product series; achieved ~70% overall winner share; monthly data produced better accuracy than weekly | Vithitsoontorn & Chongstitvatana [90] |
| ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) | Baseline statistical model for demand forecasting | MASE > 1.0 in most cases compared with LSTM | Performed better on stable demand series with minimal fluctuation | Vithitsoontorn & Chongstitvatana [90] |
| Feed-Forward Neural Network (NN) | Regional dairy product demand prediction (Amul butter) | Not specified | Demonstrated feasibility of neural networks for short-term dairy demand forecasting; used demographic and infrastructure variables | Vimal Kumar et al. [91] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Pérez Núñez, I.; Quiñones, J.; Sepúlveda Truan, G.; Cancino-Baier, D.; Agregán, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Sepúlveda, N.; Díaz, R. Strategies for Advanced Production: A Review of the Use of AI in the Dairy Industry. Animals 2026, 16, 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091363
Pérez Núñez I, Quiñones J, Sepúlveda Truan G, Cancino-Baier D, Agregán R, Lorenzo JM, Sepúlveda N, Díaz R. Strategies for Advanced Production: A Review of the Use of AI in the Dairy Industry. Animals. 2026; 16(9):1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091363
Chicago/Turabian StylePérez Núñez, Isabela, John Quiñones, Gastón Sepúlveda Truan, David Cancino-Baier, Rubén Agregán, José M. Lorenzo, Néstor Sepúlveda, and Rommy Díaz. 2026. "Strategies for Advanced Production: A Review of the Use of AI in the Dairy Industry" Animals 16, no. 9: 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091363
APA StylePérez Núñez, I., Quiñones, J., Sepúlveda Truan, G., Cancino-Baier, D., Agregán, R., Lorenzo, J. M., Sepúlveda, N., & Díaz, R. (2026). Strategies for Advanced Production: A Review of the Use of AI in the Dairy Industry. Animals, 16(9), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091363

