Next Article in Journal
Using an Equine Cadaver Head to Investigate Associations Between Sub-Noseband Space, Noseband Tension, and Sub-Noseband Pressure at Three Locations
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Savanna Systems Within the “One Health and One Welfare” Approach: Part 2—Sociodemographic and Institution Factors Impacting Relationships Between Farmers and Livestock
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Antigenic and Immunogenic Properties of the Gametocyte Antigen 56 from Eimeria necatrix
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cryptosporidium in Ochotona curzoniae and Bos grunniens of Zoige County, Sichuan Province

1
College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China
2
Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China
3
Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan Province, Liangshan 615000, China
4
China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control (IVDC), Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2025, 15(14), 2140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142140 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 June 2025 / Revised: 15 July 2025 / Accepted: 16 July 2025 / Published: 19 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coccidian Parasites: Epidemiology, Control and Prevention Strategies)

Simple Summary

Cryptosporidium is an important zoonotic parasite that infects a wide range of animals, causing diarrhea, growth retardation, and economic losses in livestock. Although Cryptosporidium has been reported in some regions of Aba Prefecture, there is limited research on the prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. in Ochotona curzoniae (plateau pika) and Bos grunniens (yak) in Zoige County. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens, and to reveal their potential zoonotic risk in Zoige County of Sichuan Province, China. The results that overall prevalence rate of Cryptosporidium in Zoige County was 8.3% (20/242), and three different Cryptosporidium species were involved, including C. bovis, C. ryanae, and an unidentified Cryptosporidium sp.; among them, an unidentified Cryptosporidium sp. was detected in O. curzoniae, and C. bovis and C. ryanae were detected in B. grunniens. These findings demonstrate that Cryptosporidium infections are present in both O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County, with notable differences in infection rates and species composition, and provide valuable data on the epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in the region and offer scientific support for the healthy development of the livestock industry and public health management.

Abstract

In order to investigate the infection status of Cryptosporidium in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County, Sichuan Province, fecal samples from B. grunniens and gastrointestinal contents from captured O. curzoniae were collected between March and December 2023 from five townships (Dazhasi, Axi, Hongxing, Tangke, and Maixi). Genomic DNA was extracted, and nested PCR targeting the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium was performed. PCR-positive products were sequenced, trimmed, aligned, and subjected to phylogenetic analysis to determine species and genotypes. A total of 242 samples were obtained, of which 20 were Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA-positive, yielding an overall detection rate of 8.3% (20/242). The detection rates of O. curzoniae and B. grunniens were 7.0% (8/114) and 9.4% (12/128), respectively. Among the five sampling sites, Maixi town exhibited the highest detection rate (32.4%, 11/44), followed by Hongxing town (15.2%, 7/46) and Tangke town (4.6%, 2/44). Phylogenetic analysis detected an unidentified Cryptosporidium sp. in O. curzoniae, while C. bovis (n = 10) and C. ryanae (n = 2) were detected in B. grunniens. These findings demonstrate that Cryptosporidium infections are present in both O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County, with notable differences in infection rates and species composition. Continued surveillance of Cryptosporidium in local livestock and wildlife is warranted to provide critical data for regional public health management.

1. Introduction

Cryptosporidium was first reported in 1907 [1] and is classified within the Apicomplexa (Phylum), Conoidasida (Class), Eucoccidiorida (Order), Cryptosporidiidae (Family), and Cryptosporidium (Genus) [2]. Its life cycle involves oocysts that excyst within the host’s gastrointestinal tract to release sporozoites, which develop through trophozoite–meront–gamont–zygote stages before forming thin- or thick-walled oocysts that are excreted in the feces [3,4]. To date, 49 valid species and over 120 genotypes of Cryptosporidium have been recognized, of which approximately 23 have been reported to infect humans, including C. hominis [5], C. meleagridis [6], C. canis, C. ubiquitum, C. cuniculus [7], C. felis [8], and C. viatorum [9,10,11]. Surveys indicate that human cryptosporidiosis cases have been documented in more than 90 countries and regions worldwide [12,13]. Cryptosporidium parasitizes the gastric or small-intestinal epithelial cells of a wide range of mammals, including livestock, humans, companion animals, and wildlife, and causes cryptosporidiosis, which is characterized by diarrhea in both humans and animals. In poultry and livestock, infection can lead to enteric and respiratory disease, manifesting as diarrhea, weight loss, and growth retardation, thereby posing a serious threat to animal husbandry; no fully effective drugs or vaccines for treatment or prevention currently exist. Vermeulen et al. used the GloWPa-Crypto L1 model to estimate global livestock-derived Cryptosporidium oocyst excretion, finding that approximately 3.2 × 1023 oocysts are shed annually through livestock feces, with cattle contributing the largest share, followed by chickens and pigs [14]. In China, over 24 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities have reported bovine cryptosporidiosis, with infection rates typically exceeding 10% in Shanxi [15], Jiangxi [16], Xinjiang [17], Ningxia [18], Yunnan [19], and Inner Mongolia [20]. Meta-analyses have demonstrated variation in infection prevalence among different cattle populations: Cai’s meta-analysis of dairy cattle in China reported an overall prevalence of 17.0% (3901/33,313) [21], while Geng’s meta-analysis of yak reported a prevalence of 10.52% (1192/8012) [22]. Additionally, infections in domestic dogs and cats are considered important zoonotic reservoirs for human cryptosporidiosis.
The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae (O. curzoniae)) is a small lagomorph in the family Ochotonidae, which is widely distributed across Tibet, Qinghai, southern Gansu, and northwestern Sichuan in China [19]. Despite its high reproductive capacity and abundance, reports of Cryptosporidium infection in O. curzoniae are extremely scarce; to date, only Zhang has documented such infections on the Qing–Tibetan Plateau [23]. Zoige County, located in northern Sichuan at the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, is a major pastoral region of northwestern Sichuan, encompassing some 10,620 km2 of grassland with an average altitude (3400–3700 m), annual temperature (0–2.0 °C), and annual rainfall (600–700 mm). Yak (Bos grunniens (B. grunniens)) represents the primary livestock resource and economic base for local herders. Both O. curzoniae and B. grunniens share the same grassland habitat and are herbivorous species. Due to their prolonged sympatric coexistence, Cryptosporidium infection in either species can readily spread to the other, establishing bidirectional transmission and enabling each to serve as a potential reservoir host. Furthermore, local herders’ traditional lifestyle and low awareness of personal hygiene substantially increase the risk of zoonotic disease transmission. However, no studies have assessed Cryptosporidium infection in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County. Thus, this study is the first to investigate their infection status, with the aim of providing data to inform control measures, support healthy livestock development, and enhance public health in the region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 114 O. curzoniae were captured between March and December 2023, of these O. curzoniae, 24, 20, 20, 20, and 30 were captured from Dazhasi, Axi, Hongxing, Maixi, and Tangke, respectively. O. curzoniaes were captured using mouse snap traps. Then, to avoid cross-contamination, the intestinal (colon) and gastric contents from each O. curzoniae were collected separately using sterile plastic gloves, stored in liquid nitrogen, and transported to the laboratory and stored at −80 °C. The body of each O. curzoniae was deeply buried to avoid being eaten by dogs, cats, or other wild carnivores. When determining the results, if either intestinal (colon) or gastric content tested positive, then O. curzoniae was determined as positive. In the same time period, a total of 128 fresh fecal samples from B. grunniens (2–3 years old) were collected from Dazhasi (n = 18), Axi (n = 40), Hongxing (n = 26), Maixi (n = 14), and Tangke (n = 14), located between 102°08′–103°39′ E longitude and 32°56′–34°19′ N latitude.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Approximately 150 mg of intestinal and gastric contents of O. curzoniae and 200 mg fecal samples of B. grunniens were added to ddH2O, and homogenates were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000× g. The total DNA of all samples was extracted using the TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China, Cat. No.GDP304, https://en.tiangen.com/ (accessed on 20 December 2023)) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After each extraction procedure, to assess the quality of the DNA, the DNA concentration was quantified using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), with samples demonstrating concentrations > 30 ng/μL (A260) being selected for subsequent experiments. The extracted genomic DNA was stored in a freezer at −20 °C until PCR amplification.

2.3. PCR Amplification

Cryptosporidium spp. in the samples was confirmed by nested PCR amplification of the SSU rRNA gene according to the previous report [24,25]. A PCR product of approximately 760 bp was first amplified with primers CrF1: 5′-GACATATCATTCAAGTTTCTGACC-3′ and CrR1: 5′-CTGAAGGAGTAAGGAACAACC-3′. A secondary PCR product of about 580 bp was then amplified with primers CrF2: 5′-CCTATCAGCTTTAGACGGTAGG-3′ and CrR2: 5′-TCTAAGAATTTCACCTCTGACTG-3′ [24,25]. The amplification reaction was conducted in a 25 µL volume containing 1.0 µL template DNA (10 U µL−1), 12.5 µL 2× PCR mix (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China, Cat. No. AS111), 2.0 µL dNTPs, and 9.5 µL distilled water. Each PCR included a positive control (DNA of C. bovis preserved in the laboratory) and a negative control (nuclease-free water). The PCR cycling conditions for the SSU rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium spp. comprised 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 57 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 6 s, and then a final extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The PCR products (3 μL) were electrophoresed at 100 V for 25 min on a 1.3% agarose gel, and the results were observed in a gelimager (Tanon Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, Cat. No. Tanon 1600).

2.4. Sequence Analysis and Phylogenetic Tree

The final positive PCR products were subjected to Sanger bidirectional sequencing by Sangon Biotech Company (Chengdu, China) using the second pair of primers. Firstly, all the obtained sequences were analyzed and manually edited by employing DNA Star (https://www.dnastar.com/ (accessed on 12 January 2024)) and were subjected to a nucleotide BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 15 January 2024) search through the NCBI database. Subsequently, the sequences with the highest similarity to the blast results were selected (1–4 sequences), and the SSU rRNA gene sequences of major Cryptosporidium spp., including C. ryanae, C. bovis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, and C. felis reported in China, were selected as reference sequences to construct a phylogenetic tree. Lastly, the phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method using MEGA 11.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 5 March 2024), and 1000 replicates (bootstrap value) were selected to assess the robustness of the findings.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Firstly, the Pearson Chi-square test with the software SPSS 19.0 (IMB Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to assess whether there was a significant difference in Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence between different sampling locations, O. curzoniae, and B. grunniens. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Secondly, the specimen numbers analyzed in the present study are relatively low; therefore, the statistical outcomes obtained were reanalyzed with Fisher’s exact test and confirmed [26]. In addition, the strength of the association between prevalence and test conditions was assessed by calculating the odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [27].

3. Results

3.1. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp.

The analysis revealed that among the 242 hosts, 20 were positive for Cryptosporidium, with an overall prevalence of 8.3%. The infection rates of O. curzoniae and B. grunniens were 7.0% (8/114) and 9.4% (12/128), respectively (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. between the O. curzoniae and B. grunniens2 = 0.441, p = 0.506). In our study, we identified three Cryptosporidium species: Cryptosporidium sp. (n = 8), C. bovis (n = 10), and C. ryanae (n = 2). In O. curzoniae, only one positive sample was detected in gastric contents, while all other positives were found in intestinal contents. Three novel Cryptosporidium spp. genotypes were identified, all exclusively detected in Maixi town, with no occurrences observed in the other four surveyed townships. Among the surveyed townships, Cryptosporidium sp. infection rates in B. grunniens were highest in Hongxing town (27.9%, 7/26), followed by Maixi town (21.4%, 3/14) and Tangke town (14.3%, 2/14). there were no obvious differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. among the three regions from B. grunniens2 = 0.66, p = 0.72). For location, Maixi town (32.4%, 11/44) had a significantly higher infection rate than Tangke town (4.6%, 2/44), with statistical significance (χ2 = 8.12, p = 0.004). However, no statistically significant difference was detected between Hongxing town (15.2%, 7/46) and Maixi town and Tangke town. C. ryanae and C. bovis were identified only in B. grunniens; among them, C. ryanae (n = 2) was detected only in Hongxing town, while C. bovis was detected in Hongxing town (n = 5), Maixi town (n = 3), and Tangke town (n = 2).

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis Based on SSU rRNA Gene of Cryptosporidium

All PCR products of the SSU rRNA genes for Cryptosporidium spp. were sequenced and compared to each other. A total of five unique sequences were obtained and submitted to GenBank; among these, three sequences from O. curzoniae and two from B. grunniens were named Cryptosporidium sp. Z-OC1 (PP463757), Cryptosporidium sp. Z-OC2 (PP463758), Cryptosporidium sp. Z-OC3 (PP463759), C. bovis Z-Y1 (PV536157), and C. ryanae Z-Y2 (PV536158). As shown in Figure 1, Cryptosporidium sp. Z-OC1 (PP463757) was clustered with the Cryptosporidium sp. isolate from Mongolian pika genotype (OR565220), with the closest genetic relationship and a similarity of 98.3%. As for Cryptosporidium sp., Z-OC2 (PP463758) and Cryptosporidium sp. Z-OC3 (PP463759) were clustered with the Cryptosporidium sp. (KF971356) isolate from B. grunniens in Qinghai Province, China, exhibiting 99.17% and 94.60% genetic similarity, respectively; C. bovis Z-Y1 (PV536157) was clustered with the C. bovis isolate DF1 (PP335809) from B. grunniens in Daofu County of Sichuan Province, with 100% similarity; C. ryanae Z-Y2 was clustered with the C. ryanae (KJ020910) from calves in Shaanxi Province, with 100% similarity.

4. Discussion

This is the first report of the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County of Sichuan Province, with occurrences of 7.0% (8/114) and 9.4% (12/128), respectively. Among the eight SSU rRNA-positive O. curzoniae samples, only one was amplified from gastric contents-designated Cryptosporidium sp. Z-OC3 (GenBank accession no. PP463759), whereas the remaining positives originated from intestinal contents. This may be related to the internal environment of the stomach, where a large amount of gastric acid is secreted, which can inactivate most oocysts. Therefore, there are relatively few Cryptosporidium species that can parasitize the stomach, mainly C. muris and C. andersoni [28]. In addition, a study on the infectivity of Cryptosporidium in the gastrointestinal tract of Mongolian gerbils showed that there is cross-immunity among gastric Cryptosporidium species, but not between intestinal and gastric isolates [29]. Research on Cryptosporidium in O. curzoniae is exceedingly limited: to date, Zhang (2018) reported a 6.3% (4/64) prevalence in Qinghai O. curzoniae, identifying two genotypes–one novel and C. parvum [23]. In contrast, lagomorphs more broadly have been studied, such as a meta-analysis by Chen (1951–2024) found a global prevalence of 6.1% in lagomorphs (domestic rabbits, wild hares, and pikas), with pika infection at 17.1% [30]; another meta-analysis of Chinese lagomorphs (1981–2023) reported an overall prevalence of 3.9%, with pika infection at 6.2% [31], suggesting that members of Ochotonidae are particularly susceptible. Our detection rate of 7.0% (8/114) in Zoige County O. curzoniae aligns closely with these earlier findings. Notably, all O. curzoniae positives in our study derived from Maixi town—the only site with alternating meadow and sandy soils, severe northern desertification, and fragmented grassland—where higher host density likely elevates transmission risk. Additionally, the relatively small sample size may also contribute. Future investigations should include additional herbivores and larger sample numbers to map Cryptosporidium distribution across Zoige.
In this study, B. grunniens exhibited a 9.4% (12/128) detection rate, lower than reports from Qinghai Province in 2013, 2014, and 2016—24.2% (142/586), 30.0% (98/327), and 28.5% (158/554), respectively [32,33,34], and lower than our laboratory’s earlier finding of 14.8% (32/216) in B. grunniens from Hongyuan County, Sichuan [35]. Conversely, our detection rate exceeds those reported in Naqu Prefecture, Tibet (9.6%, 105/1100), and for white yaks in Gansu (5.3%, 4/76) [36,37]. Collectively, these data illustrate regional variation in B. grunniens Cryptosporidium prevalence. Additionally, the number of samples, age distribution of samples, grazing method, and sample sizes could be the contributing factors. Cattle are recognized as the most common mammalian host for Cryptosporidium, with pre-weaned calves being the principal reservoir. Across 24 Chinese provinces, bovine prevalence is estimated at 14.5% (5265/36,316), rising to 45.8% (141/308) in diarrheic calves [38]. Meta-analyses of various Chinese hosts yield descending overall prevalence of dairy cattle (17.0%; 3901/33,313) [21], swine (12.2%; 4349/30,404) [39], yaks (10.5%; 1192/8012) [22], sheep and goats (4.9%) [40], and lagomorphs (3.9%) [18]. A Nigerian meta-analysis similarly ranked cattle highest at 26.1%, followed by goats (26.0%), pigs (20.0%), sheep (16.6%), humans (15.0%), laboratory animals (9.0%), and birds (7.2%) [41]. These findings underscore the need for enhanced monitoring of Cryptosporidium in bovids across the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau.
Phylogenetic analysis of SSU rRNA sequences in this study identified three taxa, Cryptosporidium sp., C. bovis, and C. ryanae, consistent with previous Sichuan reports [33,42]. Cryptosporidium sp. was recovered from O. curzoniae, whereas C. bovis and C. ryanae were detected in B. grunniens. To date, B. grunniens have been found to harbor C. ryanae, C. bovis, C. baileyi, C. andersoni, C. suis-like, C. parvum, C. hominis, C. canis, C. struthionis, C. ubiquitum, C. xiaoi, C. suis, and several novel genotypes [22,32,33,34,35,36,37,43], with C. ryanae, C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C. parvum being most common in bovines [44,45]. C. bovis was first reported from cattle feces in 2005 by Fayer et al., with a prevalent low pathogenic species mainly infecting post-weaned and adult cattle [46]. It was first reported in Indian dairy farm workers in 2010 [47], and subsequently in Australian farm workers [48], Egyptian children with diarrhea [49], and Colombian individuals [50], indicating zoonotic potential. C. ryanae, first detected in cattle in 2008 [51], is a common, low-pathogenic, or asymptomatic bovine species capable of infecting cattle of all ages, with no confirmed human cases to date. Currently, C. bovis has been detected in sheep or goats from China [52], the United States [53], Poland [54], Iran [55], and Tunisia [56], and was first identified in camels on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in 2020 [57], but has not yet been reported in other animals. In contrast, C. ryanae has been identified in horses [58], red deer [59], Tibetan sheep [52], domestic cats [60], marsh deer [61], and brown rats [62], indicating that both C. bovis and C. ryanae have potential for cross-species transmission. Among them, C. bovis is mainly transmitted between cattle and sheep, whereas C. ryanae may have a broader host range for cross-species transmission.
In our study, the species of Cryptosporidium detected in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Maixi town differed, with a finding similar to those of related studies on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau [23,33,63], and likely related to the host specificity of Cryptosporidium infections. Research shows that cattle are mainly infected with C. parvum, C. ryanae, C. andersoni, and C. bovis [21]; rodents with C. muris, C. tyzzeri, and C. viatorum [64]; sheep with C. parvum, C. xiaoi, C. ubiquitum, and C. ovis [65]; and lagomorphs with C. cuniculus [30,31]. For example, on the same farm in Qinghai Province, B. grunniens were found to harbor C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. ryanae cattle type, C. ryanae buffalo type, and C. suis-like, whereas Tibetan sheep carried C. xiaoi and C. ubiquitum [33]. In cattle on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, C. andersoni, C. canis, C. bovis, C. hominis, C. struthionis, C. ryanae, and C. serpentis have been detected, while in sheep, C. parvum and C. canis have been reported [63]. In Qinghai field mice, C. parvum, C. ubiquitum, C. canis, and a novel genotype were identified, whereas in O. curzoniae, only C. parvum and a novel genotype were found [23]. According to existing studies and the phylogenetic tree constructed in this study, the possibility of transmission of C. ryanae and C. bovis between B. grunniens and O. curzoniae appears to be very low. However, reports on Cryptosporidium infection in O. curzoniae are currently scarce, and it remains unclear whether other Cryptosporidium species (e.g., C. cuniculus, C. parvum, and C. ubiquitum) can be transmitted among O. curzoniae, B. grunniens, and humans. Therefore, continuous surveillance of Cryptosporidium infection in humans, domestic animals, and wildlife in Zoige County is still necessary.

5. Conclusions

In summary, for the first time, this study documents Cryptosporidium infection in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County, revealing differences in prevalence and species composition. Given the paucity of epidemiological data on O. curzoniae and incomplete knowledge of circulating Cryptosporidium species and genotypes, comprehensive investigations are warranted to assess the parasite’s distribution among other livestock and wildlife hosts in the region in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-C.T. and L.-L.H.; methodology, T.-C.T. and L.-Q.Z.; software, L.-Q.Z. and C.-X.C.; validation, R.-H.J.; formal analysis, R.-H.J. and L.-Q.Z.; investigation, R.-H.J.; resources, R.-H.J.; data curation, T.-C.T. and R.-H.J.; writing—original draft, T.-C.T. and L.-L.H.; writing—review and editing, T.-C.T., C.-X.C., and L.-L.H.; visualization, L.-Q.Z.; supervision, C.-X.C.; project administration, T.-C.T. and L.-L.H.; funding acquisition, T.-C.T. and L.-L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD1801302), Southwest Minzu University Double World-Class Project (XM2023014), and Teacher Training Project of Yibin University (412-2021PY066).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Southwest Minzhu University Plateau (protocol code SMU-2023-026 and 26 February 2023); O. curzoniae were collected and inspected by qualified veterinary officers. In this study, no experiment was conducted on live animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 18 April 2025), PP463757, PP463758, PP463759, PV536157, and PV536158.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chen-Dong Xiao, Yao Pan, Ke-Lei Zhou, and Ying-Lin Li for their help with the validation of the results/experiments; Hong-Xi Chen for help with investigation and supervision; and Qu-Wu Jise for help with formal analysis. We are grateful to the reviewers for their invaluable comments to improve this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SSU rRNASmall Subunit Ribosomal RNA
NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
NJNeighbor-Joining

References

  1. Xiao, L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: An update. Exp. Parasitol. 2010, 124, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tyzzer, E.E. A sporozoan found in the peptic glands of the common mouse. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1907, 5, 12–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shahbaz, M.K.; William, H.W. Past, current, and potential treatments for cryptosporidiosis in humans and farm animals: A comprehensive review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1115522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nigel, Y.; Mary, M.; Deborah, A.S.; Kevin, A.; Elizabeth, C.; Rodrigo, P.B.; Michael, W.R.; Jessica, C.K. Genomic and virulence analysis of in vitro cultured Cryptosporidium parvum. PLoS Pathog. 2024, 20, e1011992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Egan, S.; Barbosa, A.; Feng, Y.Y.; Xiao, L.H.; Ryan, U. Critters and contamination: Zoonotic protozoans in urban rodents and water quality. Water Res. 2024, 251, 121165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ng-Hublin, J.S.Y.; Combs, B.; MacKenzie, B.; Ryan, U. Human Cryptosporidiosis Diagnosed in Western Australia: A Mixed Infection with Cryptosporidium meleagridis, the Cryptosporidium Mink Genotype, and an Unknown Cryptosporidium Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2463–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Koehler, A.V.; Whipp, M.J.; Haydon, S.R.; Gasser, R.B. Cryptosporidium cuniculus—New records in human and kangaroo in Australia. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nakashima, F.T.; Fonseca, A.B.M.; Oliveira Coelho, L.F.; Silva Barbosa, A.; Bastos, O.M.P.; Uchôa, C.M.A. Cryptosporidium species in non-human animal species in Latin America: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Veter Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2022, 29, 100690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ryan, U.; Zahedi, A.; Paparini, A. Cryptosporidium in humans and animals-a one health approach to prophylaxis. Parasite Immunol. 2016, 38, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Danišová, O.; Valenčáková, A.; Stanko, M.; Luptáková, L.; Hatalová, E.; Čanády, A. Rodents as a Reservoir of Infection Caused by Multiple Zoonotic Species/Genotypes of C. Parvum, C. Hominis, C. Suis, C. Scrofarum, and the First Evidence of Cryptosporidium Muskrat Genotypes I and II of Rodents in Europe. Acta Trop. 2017, 172, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bujila, I.; Troell, K.; Ögren, J.; Hansen, A.; Killander, G.; Agudelo, L.; Lebbad, M.; Beser, J. Cryptosporidium species and subtypes identified in human domestic cases through the national microbiological surveillance programme in Sweden from 2018 to 2022. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, A.Q.; Gong, B.Y.; Liu, X.H.; Shen, Y.J.; Wu, Y.C.; Zhang, W.Z.; Cao, J.P. Aretrospective epidemiological analysis of human Cryptosporidium infection in China during the past three decades (1987–2018). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. King, P.; Tyler, K.M.; Hunter, P.R. Anthroponotic transmission of Cryptosporidium parvum predominates in countries with poorer sanitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Smith, A.T.; Foggin, J.M. The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan plateau. Anim. Conserv. 1999, 2, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, L.; Wang, M.Y.; Wang, L.F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.S.; Chai, H.L.; Fan, W.J.; Yi, C.; Ding, Y.L.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy and beef cattle in Shanxi, China. Parasitol. Res. 2023, 123, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, S.; Zou, Y.; Wang, P.; Qu, M.R.; Zheng, W.B.; Wang, P.; Chen, X.Q.; Zhu, X.Q. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Jiangxi Province, southeastern China. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Qi, M.; Wang, H.Y.; Jing, B.; Wang, D.F.; Wang, R.J.; Zhang, L.X. Occurrence and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves in Xinjiang, Northwestern China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, M.Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.S.; Qian, X.Y.; Chai, H.L.; Wang, Y.; Fan, W.J.; Yi, C.; Ding, U.L.; Han, W.X.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Ningxia, northwestern China. Vet. Res. Commun. 2024, 48, 2629–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Deng, M.L.; Heng, Z.J.; Li, L.J.; Yang, J.F.; He, J.J.; Zou, F.C.; Shu, F.F. Cryptosporidium spp. Infection and Genotype Identification in Pre-Weaned and Post-Weaned Calves in Yunnan Province, China. Animals 2024, 14, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhao, L.; Chai, H.L.; Wang, M.Y.; Zhang, Z.S.; Han, W.X.; Yang, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, W.H.; Ma, Y.M.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Central Inner Mongolia, Northern China. BMC Vet. Res. 2023, 19, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cai, Y.N.; Zhang, N.Z.; Gong, Q.L.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, X.X. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in dairy cattle in China during 2008–2018: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 132, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Geng, H.L.; Ni, H.B.; Li, J.H.; Jiang, J.; Wang, W.; Wei, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.T. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Yaks (Bos grunniens) in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 770612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, X.Y.; Jian, Y.J.; Li, X.P.; Ma, L.Q.; Karanis, G.; Karanis, P. The first report of Cryptosporidium spp. in Microtus fuscus (Qinghai vole) and Ochotona curzoniae (wild plateau pika) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area, China. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qin, S.Y.; Sun, H.T.; Chuang, L.; Zhu, J.H.; Wang, Z.J.; Ma, T.; Zhao, Q.; Lan, Y.G.; He, W.Q. Prevalence and Characterization of Cryptosporidium Species in Tibetan Antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii). Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 713873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Haydon, S.R.; Gasser, R.B. Cryptosporidium viatorum from the Native Australian Swamp Rat Rattus Lutreolus—An Emerging Zoonotic Pathogen? Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2018, 7, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Joseph, B.B.; Wieger, V.; Johnstone, T.; Sandra, M.; Nienke, V.; Laura, M.; Daisy, B.d.J.; Merlin, V.L.; Petra, F.M.; James, A.B.; et al. Performance of three rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in children with severe acute malnutrition and diarrhoea. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2019, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.Y.; Mei, J.J.; Zheng, W.B.; Liu, Q.; Gao, W.W.; Zhu, X.Q.; Xie, S.C. Molecular Identification and Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Cattle in Representative Areas of Shanxi Province, North China. Animals 2023, 13, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Angus, K. Cryptosporidiosis in Ruminants. In CRC Press eBooks; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kvác, M.; Sak, B.; Kvetonová, D.; Secor, W.E. Infectivity of gastric and intestinal Cryptosporidium species in immunocompetent Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Veter Parasitol. 2009, 163, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chen, H.L.; Zhang, Q.Z.; Qi, R. Global prevalence of lagomorpha coccidiosis from 1951 to 2024: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Res. Veter Sci. 2025, 183, 105519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, H.L.; Chen, Y.S. Prevalence of coccidia in lagomorphs in China between 1981 and 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Veter Parasitol. 2024, 328, 110185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ma, J.B.; Cai, J.Z.; Ma, J.W.; Feng, Y.Y.; Xiao, L.H. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in yaks (Bos grunniens) in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 202, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, P.L.; Cai, J.Z.; Cai, M.; Wu, W.X.; Li, C.H.; Lei, M.T.; Xu, H.L.; Feng, L.J.; Ma, J.W.; Feng, Y.Y.; et al. Distribution of Cryptosporidium species in Tibetan sheep and yaks in Qinghai, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 215, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mi, R.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, P.; Li, Z.; Lei, M.; Cai, J.; Chen, Z. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in yaks in Qinghai Province of China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hao, L.L.; Li, R.; Duan, L.; He, L. Molecular epidemiological Investigation on Cryptosporidium Infection fromYaks in Hongyuan County, Sichuan Province. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis 2016, 28, 1842–1846. [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, K.; Li, Z.X.; Zeng, Z.B.; Li, A.Y.; Khalid, M.; Muhammad, S.; Gao, K.; Li, J.K. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. In Yaks (Bos Grunniens) in Naqu, China. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 144, 104190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Qin, S.Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhao, G.H.; Zhou, D.H.; Yin, M.Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhu, X.Q. First report of Cryptosporidium spp. in white yaks in China. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, R.W.; Zhao, G.H.; Gong, Y.Y.; Zhang, L.X. Advances and perspectives on the epidemiology of bovine Cryptosporidium in China in the past 30 years. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, W.; Gong, Q.L.; Zeng, A.; Li, M.H.; Zhao, Q.; Ni, H.B. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in pigs in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 1400–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yang, X.Y.; Gong, Q.L.; Zhao, B.; Cai, Y.N.; Zhao, Q. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium Infection in Sheep and Goat Flocks in China During 2010–2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021, 21, 692–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Paul, O.O.; Isaiah, O.A. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in different hosts in Nigeria: A meta-analysis. Parasitol. Int. 2019, 71, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhong, Z.J.; Dan, J.M.; Yan, G.W.; Tu, R.; Tian, Y.N.; Cao, S.Z.; Shen, L.H.; Deng, J.L.; Yu, S.M.; Geng, Y.; et al. Occurrence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium in pre-weaned dairy calves in central Sichuan province, China. Parasite 2018, 25, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Peng, X.X.; Wang, X.; Jian, J.H.; Zuo, Q.Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.X.; Su, Y.X.; Cao, J.P.; Jiang, B.; Shen, Y.J. Investigation of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in free-ranged livestock on the southeastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2025, 25, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Feng, K.L.; Li, N.; Huang, Y.J.; Chen, C.Y.; Wen, L.X.; Wang, W.J.; Una, M.R.; Xiao, L.H.; Feng, Y.Y.; Guo, Y.Q. Longitudinal follow-up reveals occurrence of successive Cryptosporidium bovis and Cryptosporidium ryanae infections by different subtype families in dairy cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 2023, 53, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gong, C.; Cao, X.F.; Deng, L.; Li, W.; Huang, X.M.; Lan, J.C.; Xiao, Q.C.; Zhong, Z.J.; Feng, F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: A review. Parasite 2017, 24, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fayer, R.; Santín, M.; Trout, J.M. Cryptosporidium bovis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). J. Parasitol. 2005, 91, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shahbaz, M.K.; Chanchal, D.; Amiya, K.P.; Xiao, L.H.; Tomoyoshi, N.; Sandipan, G. Molecular characterization and assessment of zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium from dairy cattle in West Bengal, India. Veter Parasitol. 2010, 171, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Josephine, S.Y.N.; Keith, E.; Belinda, W.; David, N.D.; Peter, D.M.; Philippe, P.; Ross, K.; Bob, M.; Kate, L.; David, M.; et al. Evidence of Cryptosporidium transmission between cattle and humans in northern New South Wales. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 130, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yosra, A.H.; Jürgen, K.; Karsten, N.; Georgvon, S.H.; Karl, H.Z. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in livestock animals and humans in the Ismailia province of Egypt. Veter Parasitol. 2013, 193, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adriana, H.; Ximena, V.; Giovanny, H.; Julio, C.G.; Luis, R.V.; Plutarco, U.; Oswaldo, V.; Catalina, T.; Juan, D.R. Molecular detection and genotyping of intestinal protozoa from different biogeographical regions of Colombia. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fayer, R.; Santín, M.; Trout, J.M. Cryptosporidium ryanaen. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). Veter Parasitol. 2008, 156, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, F.; Ma, L.; Gou, J.M.; Yao, H.Z.; Ren, M.; Yang, B.K.; Lin, Q. Seasonal distribution of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Tibetan sheep in Qinghai, China. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, X.D.; Tamara, V.; Edward, R.A. Diverse Genotypes of Cryptosporidium in Sheep in California, USA. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kaupke, A.; Michalski, M.M.; Rzeżutka, A. Diversity of Cryptosporidium species occurring in sheep and goat breeds reared in Poland. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Firoozi, Z.; Sazmand, A.; Zahedi, A.; Astani, A.; Bafghi, A.; Kiani-Salmi, N.; Ebrahimi, B.; Tafti, A.; Ryan, U.; Mohajeri, F. Prevalence and genotyping identification of Cryptosporidium in adult ruminants in central Iran. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Soltane, R.; Guyot, K.; Dei-Cas, E.; Àyadi, A. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. (Eucoccidiorida: Cryptosporiidae) in seven species of farm animals in Tunisia. Parasite 2007, 14, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, X.Q.; Zhang, Z.C.; Ai, S.T.; Wang, X.Q.; Zhang, R.Y.; Duan, Z.Y. Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Giardia duodenalis from animal sources in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Area (QTPA) in China. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 67, 101346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mirhashemi, M.E.; Zintl, A.; Grant, T.; Lucy, F.; Mulcahy, G.; Waal, T.D. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium species in livestock in Ireland. Veter Parasitol. 2016, 216, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Figueiredo, A.M.; Köster, P.C.; Dashti, A.; Torres, R.T.; Fonseca, C.; Mysterud, A.; Bailo, B.; Carvalho, J.; Ferreira, E.; Hipólito, D.; et al. Molecular Detection and Distribution of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. Infections in Wild and Domestic Animals in Portugal. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2023, 2023, 5849842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Yang, R.C.; Joyce, L.J.Y.; Monis, P.; Ryan, U. Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in cats (Felis catus) in Western Australia. Exp. Parasitol. 2015, 155, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Teixeira, W.; Oliveira, M.; Peres, P.; Oliveira, B.; Nagata, W.; Vieira, D.; Andrade, A.; Ferrari, E.; Duarte, J.; Meireles, M.; et al. First report of genus Cryptosporidium in cervids species: Mazama americana, Mazama nana and Blastocerus dichotomus. Vet. Res. Commun. 2022, 46, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ježková, J.; Prediger, J.; Holubová, N.; Sak, B.; Konečný, R.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L.; Rost, M.; McEvoy, J.; Kváč, M. Cryptosporidium rattin. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in the Czech Republic. Parasitology 2021, 148, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, X.Y.; Jian, Y.N.; Li, X.P.; Ma, L.Q.; Gabriele, K.; Cai, Q.G.; Panagiotis, K. Molecular detection and prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. infections in two types of domestic farm animals in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Area (QTPA) in China. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Taghipour, A.; Olfatifar, M.; Foroutan, M.; Bahadory, S.; Malih, N.; Norouzi, M. Global prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 182, 105119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, Y.C.; Qin, H.K.; Huang, J.Y.; Li, J.Q.; Zhang, L.X. The global prevalence of Cryptosporidium in sheep: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology 2022, 149, 1652–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA gene. ●: Sequence obtained from O. curzoniae. ▲: Sequence obtained from B. grunniens. Bootstrap values from 1000 pseudoreplicates are indicated at the left of the supported node. Scale bar indicates an evolutionary distance of 0.05 substitutions per site in the sequence.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA gene. ●: Sequence obtained from O. curzoniae. ▲: Sequence obtained from B. grunniens. Bootstrap values from 1000 pseudoreplicates are indicated at the left of the supported node. Scale bar indicates an evolutionary distance of 0.05 substitutions per site in the sequence.
Animals 15 02140 g001
Table 1. The infection rates of Cryptosporidium in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County of Sichuan Province.
Table 1. The infection rates of Cryptosporidium in O. curzoniae and B. grunniens in Zoige County of Sichuan Province.
LocationHostNo. Positive/No. of SamplesPrevalence% (95% CI)OR (95% CI)Cryptosporidium spp.Location Subtotal % (95% CI), OR
DazhasiO. curzoniae0/240
B. grunniens0/180
AxiO. curzoniae0/200
B. grunniens0/400
HongxingO. curzoniae0/200 15.2 (6.6–28.0), 3.8
B. grunniens7/2627.9 (12.3–47.0) C. ryanae (n = 2),
C. bovis (n = 5)
MaixiO. curzoniae8/2040.0 (19.1–63.9)2.4 (0.5–11.6)Cryptosporidium sp. (n = 8)32.4 (17.2–51.2), 10.0
B. grunniens3/1421.4 (4.8–46.6)ReferenceC. bovis (n = 3)
TangkeO. curzoniae0/300 4.6% (0.6–14.8),
Reference
B. grunniens2/1414.3 (1.8–37.8) C. bovis (n = 2)
Host subtotalO. curzoniae8/1147.0 (2.3–11.7)Reference
B. grunniens12/1289.4 (4.9–15.7)1.4 (0.5–3.5)
Total 20/2428.3 (5.1–12.5)
Reference: The reference group used for calculating the odds ratio (OR). The OR value for this group is fixed at 1.0. OR values for other groups represent the risk ratio relative to this group. Reference group for OR calculation, adjusted for location and host. OR: Odds Ratio. CI: Confidence Interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, T.-C.; Jike, R.-H.; Zhu, L.-Q.; Chen, C.-X.; Hao, L.-L. Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cryptosporidium in Ochotona curzoniae and Bos grunniens of Zoige County, Sichuan Province. Animals 2025, 15, 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142140

AMA Style

Tang T-C, Jike R-H, Zhu L-Q, Chen C-X, Hao L-L. Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cryptosporidium in Ochotona curzoniae and Bos grunniens of Zoige County, Sichuan Province. Animals. 2025; 15(14):2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Tian-Cai, Ri-Hong Jike, Liang-Quan Zhu, Chao-Xi Chen, and Li-Li Hao. 2025. "Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cryptosporidium in Ochotona curzoniae and Bos grunniens of Zoige County, Sichuan Province" Animals 15, no. 14: 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142140

APA Style

Tang, T.-C., Jike, R.-H., Zhu, L.-Q., Chen, C.-X., & Hao, L.-L. (2025). Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cryptosporidium in Ochotona curzoniae and Bos grunniens of Zoige County, Sichuan Province. Animals, 15(14), 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop