Histone Methyltransferase SETD2 Is Required for Porcine Early Embryonic Development

Simple Summary Normal early embryonic development is important for ensuring sow fertility. Low quality of in vitro production embryos severely limits extensive application of porcine embryo engineering technologies in animal agriculture and the biomedicine field. Histone H3K36 methyltransferase SETD2 reportedly regulates oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryonic development in mice. However, the specific substrate and function of SETD2 in porcine early embryonic development remains unclear. Here, we show that SETD2 preferentially catalyzes H3K36me3 in porcine early embryos. SETD2 knockdown severely impeded blastocyst cavitation and perturbed normal allocation of inner cell mass and trophectoderm. SETD2 knockdown caused the apoptosis of cells within blastocysts. Therefore, SETD2 is essential for porcine early embryonic development. These findings provide a better understanding of porcine early embryonic development and lay a potential basis for improving the quality of porcine in vitro production embryos. Abstract SET domain-containing 2 (SETD2) is a methyltransferase that can catalyze the di- and tri-methylation of lysine 36 on histone H3 (H3K36me2/me3). SETD2 frequently mediates H3K36me3 modification to regulate both oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryonic development in mice. However, the specific substrate and function of SETD2 in porcine early embryonic development are still unclear. In this study, SETD2 preferentially catalyzed H3K36me3 to regulate porcine early embryonic development. SETD2 mRNA is dynamically expressed during early embryonic development. Functional studies using an RNA interference (RNAi) approach revealed that the expression levels of SETD2 mRNA were effectively knocked down by siRNA microinjection. Immunofluorescence analysis indicated that SETD2 knockdown (KD) did not affect H3K36me2 modification but significantly reduced H3K36me3 levels, suggesting a preferential H3K36me3 recognition of SETD2 in porcine embryos. Furthermore, SETD2 KD significantly reduced blastocyst rate and disrupted allocation between inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) lineage. The expression levels of key genes important for specification of the first two lineages apparently decreased in SETD2 KD blastocysts. SETD2 KD markedly increased the apoptotic percentage of cells within embryos and altered the expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes. Therefore, our data indicate that SETD2 is essential for porcine early embryonic development.


Introduction
Epigenetic modifications of chromatin need to be removed soon after fertilization and re-established during blastocyst formation [1,2]. The remodeling of chromatin modifications safeguards the precise spatio-temporal gene expression during early embryogenesis. Previous studies have shown that removal of parentally inherited epigenetic marks except for imprinted genes promotes embryonic genome activation (EGA) and supports the continued development of both naturally fertilized and cloned embryos [3,4]. In addition, the generation of both ICM and TE lineages during blastocyst formation coincides with the re-establishment of epigenetic marks [2,5], implying an involvement of epigenetic modifications in the first lineage specification. Indeed, methylation of the Elf5 promoter facilitates the specification of pluripotent lineage in mouse embryos [6]. Dimethylation on arginine 26 of histone H3 (H3R26me2) plays an instructive role in the ICM lineage formation [7]. However, the roles of histone lysine methylations in early embryo development are not largely explored.
Histone H3 lysine 36 residue can be modified in the forms of mono-, di-and trimethylation. It is well recognized that SETD2 is the main methyltransferase for catalyzing H3K36me3 in cells [8,9]. A recent study demonstrated the function of SETD2 in catalyzing H3K36me2 in mouse oocytes [10]. Given the unique consequence of each histone methylation [11], it is necessary to identify the specific histone substrate of SETD2 in a specific cellular context. From a functional standpoint, SETD2 has been implicated in various molecular events, such as transcriptional regulation [12], DNA repair [13], DNA methylation [14], mRNA N6-methyladenosine [15], and pre-mRNA splicing [16]. In zebrafish, SETD2-mediated H3K36me3 is dispensable for early embryonic development [17], while H3K36me3 modification catalyzed by SETD2 takes part in the regulation of germ cell differentiation in Drosophila [18]. In mice, zygotic SETD2-deficient embryos arrested at E10.5-E11.5 [8]. Conditional knockout in the germline showed that maternal or paternal SETD2 regulates oocyte maturation [19] and spermatogenesis [20], respectively. Knockdown of SETD2 by an RNAi approach also impeded blastocyst formation [21]. In addition, SETD2-catalyzed H3K36me3 participates in lineage specification of stem cells [22,23]. Although the expression of SETD2 protein has been characterized in porcine embryos [24], the role of SETD2 in porcine early embryonic development remains unclear.
In the present study, pig embryos were used to examine the expression of SETD2 during early development. Functional studies using an RNAi approach showed that SETD2 specifically catalyzes H3K36me3 modification in porcine embryos. SETD2 is required for porcine early embryonic development. These findings provide new insights into the role of SETD2 in the preimplantation embryo development.

In Vitro Maturation of Oocytes
Ovaries were collected from a local slaughterhouse. Follicular fluid was aspirated from antral follicles at 3-6 mm in diameter. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were selected under a stereomicroscope. Subsequently, COCs were cultured in 4-well plates containing maturation medium for 44 h at 38.5 • C, 5% CO 2 and saturated humidity. Cumulus cells were removed using 1 mg/mL hyaluronidase following maturation.

Parthenogenetic Activation (PA)
Oocytes at the metaphase of meiosis II (MII) were stimulated using two pulses of direct current (1.56 kV/cm for 80 ms) in activation medium (0.3 M mannitol supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl 2 , 0.1 mM MgCl 2 and 0.01% polyvinyl alcohol). Subsequently, the MII oocytes were washed in the porcine zygote medium (PZM-3). Oocytes were then cultured in the chemically assisted activation medium for 4 h. Embryos were then cultured in PZM-3 droplets at 38.5 • C, 5% CO 2 and 95% air with saturated humidity.

In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
MII oocytes were washed in the modified Tris-buffered medium (mTBM) containing 2 mg/mL BSA and 2 mM caffeine. Approximately 15 oocytes were incubated in 50 µL droplets of mTBM for 4 h at 38.5 • C in 5% CO 2 in air. Semen from two boars was mixed and centrifuged at 1900× g for 4 min in DPBS supplemented with 1 mg/mL BSA (pH 7.3). Then, sperm was re-suspended with mTBM and adjusted to a proper concentration. Fifty microliters of the sperm solution was added to the mTBM droplets containing oocytes, with a final concentration of 1 × 10 6 sperms/mL. Following fertilization for 6 h, putative zygotes were incubated in PZM-3 at 38.5 • C in 5% CO 2 in air. RNA was isolated from oocytes and embryos using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany, 74104). cDNA was synthesized using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany, 205311). The assembly of PCR was prepared in FastStart SYBR Green Master (Roche, Dusseldorf, Germany, 04673514001) and was run on StepOne Plus (Applied Biosystems, Foster, New York, NY, USA). Each experiment was replicated three times for each gene. EF1A1 was used as the housekeeping gene. The Cq values were obtained and analyzed using the 2 −∆∆Ct method. The primers used in this study are provided in Table S1.

Immunofluorescence
Samples were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution for 15 min. Samples were permeabilized using 1% Triton X-100 for 30 min. Samples were then blocked using 2% BSA for 1 h. Samples were co-incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 • C. Following washing, samples were co-incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h in the dark at 37 • C. After washing, samples were stained using 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, 1 mg/mL) or propidium iodide (PI, 1 mg/mL) for 10 min and were then loaded onto glass slides. For negative control, samples were incubated in blocking solution, omitting secondary antibodies to validate the specificity of commercially available primary antibodies. Finally, images of samples were captured at room temperature using laser scanning confocal microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Signal intensity of targets in nuclear and cytoplasmic regions was assessed using Image J software. The usage information of antibodies is provided in Table S2.

Microinjection
siRNA species was designed to target three different sites of the porcine SETD2 coding region (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). The siRNA sequences are provided in Table S3. Microinjection was performed in a T2 (TCM199 with 2% FBS) medium containing 7.5 µg/mL Cytochalasin B. Then, 10 pl siRNA solution (50 µM) was injected into the cytoplasm of oocytes. Oocytes were injected with SETD2 siRNA or negative control (NC) siRNA. NC siRNA is an injected control with the injection of sham water. Uninjected oocytes served as the control group.

TdT (Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase)-Mediated dUDP Nick-End (TUNEL) Staining
Blastocysts at day 7 were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min at RT. After washing, embryos were permeabilized using 1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at RT and incubated in DNase I (TIANGEN, RT411, Beijing, China) for 1 h at 38.5 • C. After washing, embryos treated with DNase I and enzyme solution without the treatment of label solution (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, 7791-13-1, Roche, Dusseldorf, Germany) served as the positive control group. Embryos only treated with DNase I without the treatment of enzyme and label solution served as the negative control group. Embryos without the DNase I treatment in the other groups were directly incubated in enzyme solution for 1 h. Embryos in all groups were stained with DAPI (1 mg/mL) for 15 min and were then imaged using laser scanning confocal microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Exposure time for each channel was consistent among different groups. Total numbers of cells and the numbers of apoptotic dead cells were counted, and the apoptotic ratio was calculated by dividing the number of dead cells by the total number of cells, which included dead cells.

Statistical Analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA (SPSS 17.0). Arc-sine transformation was performed for the percentage data. Data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (mean ± S.E.M). p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Dynamic Expression of SETD2 mRNA during Early Embryonic Development
To examine the expression of SETD2 transcripts, qPCR was carried out to analyze the abundance of STED2 transcripts. We found that the expression levels of SETD2 mRNA during the development of GV oocyte to the four-cell stage were similar to those in blastocysts, but its expression levels were apparently higher in eight-cell and morula embryos and morula stages than those in oocytes or embryos at the other stages ( Figure 1A) (p < 0.05). Therefore, SETD2 mRNA was shown to be expressed in porcine early embryos. dead cells were counted, and the apoptotic ratio was calculated by dividing the number of dead cells by the total number of cells, which included dead cells.

Statistical Analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA (SPSS 17.0). Arc-sine transformation was performed for the percentage data. Data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (mean ± S.E.M). p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Dynamic Expression of SETD2 mRNA During Early Embryonic Development
To examine the expression of SETD2 transcripts, qPCR was carried out to analyze the abundance of STED2 transcripts. We found that the expression levels of SETD2 mRNA during the development of GV oocyte to the four-cell stage were similar to those in blastocysts, but its expression levels were apparently higher in eight-cell and morula embryos and morula stages than those in oocytes or embryos at the other stages ( Figure 1A) (p < 0.05). Therefore, SETD2 mRNA was shown to be expressed in porcine early embryos.

RNAi-Mediated Efficient Knockdown of SETD2 mRNA in Early Embryos
To investigate the role of SETD2 in early embryonic development, RNAi was performed to delete the SETD2 transcripts. The data showed that siRNA injection significantly decreased the levels of SETD2 transcript in eight-cell embryos ( Figure 2A) and blastocyst ( Figure 2B) compared to the control groups (p < 0.05). There were no differences in expression levels between NC siRNA and uninjected control groups (Figure 2A,B). Together, these results document that siRNA injection can reduce SETD2 mRNA expression in porcine embryos.

RNAi-Mediated Efficient Knockdown of SETD2 mRNA in Early Embryos
To investigate the role of SETD2 in early embryonic development, RNAi was performed to delete the SETD2 transcripts. The data showed that siRNA injection significantly decreased the levels of SETD2 transcript in eight-cell embryos ( Figure 2A) and blastocyst ( Figure 2B) compared to the control groups (p < 0.05). There were no differences in expression levels between NC siRNA and uninjected control groups (Figure 2A,B). Together, these results document that siRNA injection can reduce SETD2 mRNA expression in porcine embryos.

SETD2 Knockdown Efficiently Reduces H3K36me3 Levels in Early Embryos
To ascertain the effects of SETD2 KD on the levels of H3K36me2 and H3K36me3, The independent experiment was carried out for three times and 30 embryos in each group were at least included. NC, negative control. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

SETD2 Knockdown Efficiently Reduces H3K36me3 Levels in Early Embryos
To ascertain the effects of SETD2 KD on the levels of H3K36me2 and H3K36me3, immunofluorescence was carried out in early embryos. Fluorescence intensity analysis revealed that SETD2 KD had no effects on H3K36me2 levels in eight-cell embryos and blastocysts compared to the control groups ( Figure 3A,B). As shown in Figure 3C,D, there were no significant differences in the H3K36me3 levels in eight-cell embryos and blastocysts between NC injection and control group. However, SETD2 KD significantly decreased H3K36me3 levels in eight-cell embryos ( Figure 3C) and blastocysts ( Figure 3D) stage relative to the control groups (p < 0.05). Hence, SETD2 KD efficiently decreased H3K36me3 levels in porcine early embryos. Figure 2. Effect of siRNA injection on the expression levels of SETD2 mRNA. Expression levels SETD2 transcripts in eight-cell (A) and blastocyst (B) among different groups was analyzed qPCR. The independent experiment was carried out for three times and 30 embryos in each gro were at least included. NC, negative control. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and different l ters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

SETD2 Knockdown Efficiently Reduces H3K36me3 Levels in Early Embryos
To ascertain the effects of SETD2 KD on the levels of H3K36me2 and H3K36me immunofluorescence was carried out in early embryos. Fluorescence intensity analy revealed that SETD2 KD had no effects on H3K36me2 levels in eight-cell embryos an blastocysts compared to the control groups ( Figure 3A,B). As shown in Figure 3C,D, the were no significant differences in the H3K36me3 levels in eight-cell embryos and blast cysts between NC injection and control group. However, SETD2 KD significantly d creased H3K36me3 levels in eight-cell embryos ( Figure 3C) and blastocysts (Figure 3 stage relative to the control groups (p < 0.05). Hence, SETD2 KD efficiently decreas H3K36me3 levels in porcine early embryos.

SETD2 Knockdown Blocks Blastocyst Development and Perturbs Lineage Allocation
To evaluate the consequences of SETD2 KD on early embryonic development, the developmental rates of SETD2 KD embryos were compared to those in NC siRNA and the control group. We observed that SETD2 KD did not affect the rates of two-cell, four-cell, eight-cell and morula embryos ( Figure S1) but significantly reduced the blastocyst rates (Day 5-7) compared to the control groups ( Figure 4A,B) (p < 0.05). Similarly, SETD2 KD did Animals 2022, 12, 2226 6 of 11 not influence the rates of two-cell, four-cell, eight-cell and morula embryos derived from IVF ( Figure S2B), while SETD2 KD significantly reduced blastocyst rates (day 5-7) ( Figure S2A,B) (p < 0.05). We found no differences in embryo development between NC siRNA injected and the control group ( Figures 4A,B and S2A,B). To further determine whether SETD2 KD influenced lineage allocation, CDX2 staining in embryos was performed to determine the TE cell number (Figures 4C and S2C). The CDX2 negative cells in blastocysts were considered to be ICM cells. We observed that the number of total cells and TE cells was significantly reduced in SETD2 KD embryos, but the number of ICM cells did not change ( Figures 4D and S2D) (p < 0.05). Moreover, SETD2 KD apparently decreased the ratio of ICM/TE cells in blastocysts ( Figures 4D and S2D) (p < 0.05). Altogether, SETD2 was required for blastocyst formation and the first lineage segregation.
To evaluate the consequences of SETD2 KD on early embryonic development, th developmental rates of SETD2 KD embryos were compared to those in NC siRNA an the control group. We observed that SETD2 KD did not affect the rates of two-cell, four cell, eight-cell and morula embryos ( Figure S1) but significantly reduced the blastocys rates (Day 5-7) compared to the control groups ( Figure 4A,B) (p < 0.05). Similarly, SETD KD did not influence the rates of two-cell, four-cell, eight-cell and morula embryos de rived from IVF ( Figure S2B), while SETD2 KD significantly reduced blastocyst rates (da 5-7) ( Figure S2A,B) (p < 0.05). We found no differences in embryo development betwee NC siRNA injected and the control group ( Figures 4A,B and S2A,B). To further determin whether SETD2 KD influenced lineage allocation, CDX2 staining in embryos was per formed to determine the TE cell number (Figures 4C and S2C). The CDX2 negative cell in blastocysts were considered to be ICM cells. We observed that the number of total cell and TE cells was significantly reduced in SETD2 KD embryos, but the number of ICM cells did not change ( Figures 4D and S2D) (p < 0.05). Moreover, SETD2 KD apparentl decreased the ratio of ICM/TE cells in blastocysts ( Figures 4D and S2D) (p < 0.05). Alto gether, SETD2 was required for blastocyst formation and the first lineage segregation.

SETD2 Knockdown Perturbs the Expression of Genes Important for the First Cell Differentiation
To determine the effects of SETD2 KD on the expression of genes encoding for the markers of ICM and TE lineage specification, the relative mRNA abundance of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, TEAD4, GATA3, TFAP2C, YAP, CDX2, EOMES, and BMP4 was quantified by qPCR in day 7 embryos. We found that SETD2 KD did not affect the expression of EOMES and BMP4 mRNA, whereas it led to a significant reduction in the expression levels of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, TEAD4, GATA3, TFAP2C, YAP, and CDX2 mRNA ( Figure 5) (p < 0.05). In addition, the expression levels of the indicated genes in the NC siRNA injection group were similar to those in the control group ( Figure 5). Thus, these results show that SETD2 modulates the expression of genes associated with the first cell differentiation in blastocysts.
embryos from each group. The numbers of total cells, ICM, TE, and the ratio of ICM/TE cells were separately statistically analyzed. ICM: inner cell mass; TE: trophectoderm. All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M, and different letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

SETD2 Knockdown Perturbs the Expression of Genes Important for the First Cell Differentiation
To determine the effects of SETD2 KD on the expression of genes encoding for the markers of ICM and TE lineage specification, the relative mRNA abundance of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, TEAD4, GATA3, TFAP2C, YAP, CDX2, EOMES, and BMP4 was quantified by qPCR in day 7 embryos. We found that SETD2 KD did not affect the expression of EOMES and BMP4 mRNA, whereas it led to a significant reduction in the expression levels of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, TEAD4, GATA3, TFAP2C, YAP, and CDX2 mRNA ( Figure  5) (p < 0.05). In addition, the expression levels of the indicated genes in the NC siRNA injection group were similar to those in the control group ( Figure 5). Thus, these results show that SETD2 modulates the expression of genes associated with the first cell differentiation in blastocysts. Expression of genes required for the ICM and TE lineage specification in blastocysts from each group. Expression levels of the indicated genes was analyzed by qPCR. The independent experiment was carried out for three times and 30 embryos in each group were at least included. The data are presented as mean ± S.E.M and different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

SETD2 Knockdown Elevates Apoptosis and Alters the Expression of Pro-Apoptotic and Anti-Apoptotic Genes in Blastocysts
Considering the protective role of SETD2 in genomic stability prompted us to perform TUNEL staining to evaluate the effects of SETD2 KD on apoptosis in blastocysts. As shown in Figure 6A, all TUNEL-positive nuclei were observed in the positive control embryos, while there were no TUNEL-positive nuclei in the negative control embryos. Moreover, quantitative analysis showed that SETD2 KD did not change apoptotic cell number ( Figure 6A,B), but remarkably increased the apoptotic ratio of blastocysts ( Figure 6C) (p < 0.05). Consistent with the increased apoptosis levels, SETD2 KD not only significantly enhanced expression of pro-apoptotic gene BAX but also dramatically reduced the mRNA expression abundance of the anti-apoptotic gene BCL2 ( Figure 6D) (p < 0.05). However, Figure 5. SETD2 KD affected the expression of cell differentiation genes. Expression of genes required for the ICM and TE lineage specification in blastocysts from each group. Expression levels of the indicated genes was analyzed by qPCR. The independent experiment was carried out for three times and 30 embryos in each group were at least included. The data are presented as mean ± S.E.M and different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

SETD2 Knockdown Elevates Apoptosis and Alters the Expression of Pro-Apoptotic and Anti-Apoptotic Genes in Blastocysts
Considering the protective role of SETD2 in genomic stability prompted us to perform TUNEL staining to evaluate the effects of SETD2 KD on apoptosis in blastocysts. As shown in Figure 6A, all TUNEL-positive nuclei were observed in the positive control embryos, while there were no TUNEL-positive nuclei in the negative control embryos. Moreover, quantitative analysis showed that SETD2 KD did not change apoptotic cell number ( Figure 6A,B), but remarkably increased the apoptotic ratio of blastocysts ( Figure 6C) (p < 0.05). Consistent with the increased apoptosis levels, SETD2 KD not only significantly enhanced expression of pro-apoptotic gene BAX but also dramatically reduced the mRNA expression abundance of the anti-apoptotic gene BCL2 ( Figure 6D) (p < 0.05). However, SETD2 KD did not affect the expression of anti-apoptotic genes including CASPASE and P53 ( Figure 6D). Hence, these results indicate that SETD2 is important for maintaining genomic stability in porcine blastocysts. SETD2 KD did not affect the expression of anti-apoptotic genes including CASPASE and P53 ( Figure 6D). Hence, these results indicate that SETD2 is important for maintaining genomic stability in porcine blastocysts.

Discussion
Despite SETD2 regulating both oocyte maturation and pre-implantation embryonic development in mice [21,25], the histone substrate and function of SETD2 in porcine early embryogenesis, especially in the first cell differentiation, are not yet known. We show herein that SETD2 preferentially catalyses H3K36me3, but not H3K36me2 in porcine early embryos. SETD2 regulates blastocyst formation and the first lineage specification. Importantly, SETD2 is also involved in the modulation of genes important for cell differentiation and apoptosis. Therefore, these data demonstrate that SETD2 possibly mediates expression of lineage differentiation and apoptosis genes to regulate porcine early embryonic development.
Recent low-input sequencing of epigenetic marks revealed a critical role of H3K4me3 modification in embryonic genome activation [26]. Both H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 modulated ICM and TE lineage specification during blastocyst development [27]. In a previous study, SETD2 was highly expressed in porcine embryos at the four-cell and blastocyst stage [24], suggesting a possible role of SETD2 in both EGA and blastocyst formation. However, our results indicated that SETD2 is not essential for the development of fourcell to eight-cell embryos, at which stage the EGA occurs in pigs. The finding is aligned with those of previous studies in mice that SETD2 KD did not impair the development of

Discussion
Despite SETD2 regulating both oocyte maturation and pre-implantation embryonic development in mice [21,25], the histone substrate and function of SETD2 in porcine early embryogenesis, especially in the first cell differentiation, are not yet known. We show herein that SETD2 preferentially catalyses H3K36me3, but not H3K36me2 in porcine early embryos. SETD2 regulates blastocyst formation and the first lineage specification. Importantly, SETD2 is also involved in the modulation of genes important for cell differentiation and apoptosis. Therefore, these data demonstrate that SETD2 possibly mediates expression of lineage differentiation and apoptosis genes to regulate porcine early embryonic development.
Recent low-input sequencing of epigenetic marks revealed a critical role of H3K4me3 modification in embryonic genome activation [26]. Both H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 modulated ICM and TE lineage specification during blastocyst development [27]. In a previous study, SETD2 was highly expressed in porcine embryos at the four-cell and blastocyst stage [24], suggesting a possible role of SETD2 in both EGA and blastocyst formation. However, our results indicated that SETD2 is not essential for the development of fourcell to eight-cell embryos, at which stage the EGA occurs in pigs. The finding is aligned with those of previous studies in mice that SETD2 KD did not impair the development of two-cell embryos [8] and H3K36me3 is uncoupled with EGA [28]. It is worth noting that mouse embryos with depletion of maternal SETD2 arrested at the two-cell stage [19], which suggests a critical role of maternal SETD2 in the EGA. On the other hand, it was observed that SETD2 KD impaired porcine blastocyst formation, as demonstrated in mouse preim-plantation embryonic development [21]. This implies that SETD2 s function in blastocyst development may be conserved between different species.
Histone lysine residue usually presents different methylated statuses and each methylation isoform exerts differential functions in diverse contexts [11]. Although SETD2 is reported to be the primary methyltransfease catalyzing H3K36me3, a recent study revealed that SETD2 is simultaneously implicated in catalyzing H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 in mouse oocytes [10]. In this study, we found that SETD2 preferentially recognizes H3K36me3 but not H3K36me2 in porcine embryos. This suggests that the option of SETD2 for histone substrates likely have a preference between different species or cell types. The developmental asynchrony of early embryos could cause the differential choice for methylation modifications of SETD2 between mice and pigs [29].
The specification of ICM and TE cells is tightly regulated by lineage-restricted expressed transcription factors [30]. The unique expression pattern of lineage determinants is relevant to dynamic changes in histone methylation modifications during early embryogenesis. Indeed, the number of total and TE cells is significantly decreased, whereas the ICM/TE ratio is markedly increased in STED2 KD pig blastocysts. This indicates that SETD2 regulates the first lineage specification during porcine blastocyst formation. However, we observed that SETD2 KD did not affect the ICM cell number in porcine blastocysts, which is possibly because SETD2-mediated H3K36me3 is dispensable for the maintenance of pluripotent cells, as shown in mouse embryonic stem cells [31]. Paradoxically, our results indicated that SETD2 regulated the expression of pluripotency genes including OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG in porcine embryos. It is possible that SETD2 promotes the expression of these genes to regulate other embryonic developmental events in pigs. On the other hand, consistent with our results, Setd2 KD severely disrupted trophoblast lineage differentiation during blastocyst outgrowth in mice [32]. As expected, SETD2 modulated the expression of several TE genes, such as TEAD4 [33], GATA3 [34], TFAP2C [35], YAP [36], and CDX2 [37]. A number of studies have shown that knockdown or knockout of these genes impairs the TE lineage specification in different species. Thus, we speculate that SETD2 likely mediates the expression of these genes to specify the TE lineage.
Apoptosis is a normal phenomenon for embryos during pre-and post-implantation development under physiological conditions [38]. Excessive apoptosis led to severe defects in the lineage specification, especially in TE differentiation of post-implantation embryos [39]. In this study, we observed that SETD2 KD increased apoptotic percentage and altered the expression of pro-and anti-apoptosis genes in blastocysts. Thus, the lineage specification defects in SETD2-deleted embryos could be due to the excessive apoptosis. High-throughout techniques are needed to determine whether SETD2 directly regulates the expression of lineage specification and apoptosis genes in pigs.

Conclusions
Our results indicate that SETD2 is required for porcine early embryonic development. Our findings deepen the understanding of the role of SETD2 in the pre-implantation embryo development and broaden the future research on embryo implantation and fullterm development.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https:// www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12172226/s1, Figure S1: Effect of SETD2 knockdown on development of early cleavage-stage parthenogenetic embryos. Figure S2: Effect of SETD2 knockdown on both development of in vitro fertilization embryos and lineage allocation in blastocysts. Table S1: Porcine-specific primer sequences used in this study. Table S2: Information on primary, secondary antibodies used in this study. Table S3: Information on SETD2 siRNA sequences.

Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.