Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Feeding Liquid or Dry Creep Feed on Growth Performance, Feed Disappearance, Enzyme Activity and Number of Eaters in Suckling Piglets
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Dams and Suckling Lamb Feeding Systems on the Fatty Acid Composition of Suckling Lamb Meat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Standardized Ileal Digestible Total Sulfur Amino Acids to Lysine REQUIREMENTS Are Increased in Nursery Pigs Raised under Antibiotic-Free Feeding Regime

1
Novus International, Inc., St. Charles, MO 63304, USA
2
Genus PIC North America, Hendersonville, TN 37075, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(11), 3143; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113143
Submission received: 3 September 2021 / Revised: 5 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 3 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Total sulfur amino acids play a critical role in numerous biological functions, including antioxidative status and immunity, as well as protein synthesis. Weaning pigs commonly face multiple stressors which can impair their gut integrity and growth performance. Antibiotic removal from the diets in weaning pigs can stimulate immune response and divert nutrients from growth to optimize immune function. The objective of the current two studies was to determine the optimal ratio of the standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine (TSAA:Lys) in nursery pigs under an antibiotics-free feeding regime. The results demonstrated that the optimal SID TSAA:Lys for nursery pigs raised without antibiotics during the first 21 d post-weaning was 62 to 72% in terms of growth performance, whereas the optimal SID TSAA:Lys was approximately 58% in terms of growth performance in the late nursery phase.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of increasing the standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine (TSAA:Lys) on the growth performance of nursery pigs raised with or without antibiotics (AGP) and to determine the optimal SID TSAA:Lys in nursery pigs raised without AGP. In Exp. 1, 924 nursery pigs (7.9 ± 1.3 kg), blocked by initial BW and sex, were randomly allotted to one of six treatments, with seven pens per treatment and twenty-two pigs per pen. The treatments were arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial design, with two AGP levels (0 or 50 mg/kg Carbodox) and three levels of SID TSAA:Lys (51.0, 58.5 or 66.0%). In Exp. 2, 990 weaned piglets (5.1 ± 0.9 kg), blocked by initial BW and sex, were randomly allotted to one of five dietary treatments (SID TSAA:Lys at 51, 58, 65, 72 or 79%) in the absence of AGP, with nine pens per treatment and twenty-two pigs per pen. Competing heteroskedastic models including broken-line linear (BLL), broken-line quadratic (BLQ), and quadratic polynomial (QP) were fitted for the growth performance data to estimate the optimal TSAA:Lys. In Exp. 1, AGP supplementation increased (p < 0.05) ADG and ADFI during the 21 d period. Increasing SID TSAA:Lys in the diets with AGP did not affect growth performance; however, increasing SID TSAA:Lys in the diets without AGP resulted in a linear increase (p < 0.05) in ADG and G:F. In Exp. 2, the best-fitting models for ADG and G:F from d 0 to 21 post-weaning were BLL, which yielded the optimal SID TSAA:Lys of 62% and 72%, respectively. The best-fitting models for ADG and G:F from d 21 to 42 post-weaning were BLL, which yielded the optimal SID TSAA:Lys of 59% and 58%, respectively. In conclusion, SID TSAA to Lys requirements under an antibiotic-free feeding regime during the first 21 d post-weaning were 62% and 72% in terms of ADG and G:F, respectively, whereas an SID TSAA:Lys of approximately 58% was required to maximize ADG and G:F for the late nursery phase.

1. Introduction

Total sulfur amino acids (TSAA), composed of methionine (Met) and cysteine (Cys), are considered as the second or third most limiting amino acid in the diets of nursery pigs [1]. Methionine can be converted to Cys via cystathionine through the transmethylation and trans-sulfuration pathways [2]. Moreover, the function of protein synthesis, Met, has numerous biological functions, including being a precursor for methyl donors, glutathione and taurine [3]; an antioxidative effect [4], and an adaptive immunity enhancement [5,6]. These functional roles of Met are critical for the growth development and health status of pigs [7].
Antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) have been used in monogastric diets for many decades to control disease and improve growth performance. With the removal of AGP in the diets, the lack of enteric pathogen control stimulates an immune response and therefore diverts nutrients away from aiding growth to meet the immunity function [8]. It was demonstrated that the tryptophan (Trp) or threonine (Thr) requirements of the pigs were higher when pigs that were fed diets without antibiotics compared with diets with antibiotics [9,10]. Additionally, the TSAA requirement was also increased in nursery pigs challenged with a pathogenic strain of E. coli [11]. Traditionally, the TSAA requirements for nursery pigs were determined when the antibiotics were used in the diets or water. With the ban of AGP in their diets, there is a need to establish the TSAA requirement for nursery pigs fed diets without AGP. To our best knowledge, no studies have reported the TSAA requirement for nursery pigs under an antibiotics-free regime. It was hypothesized that the pigs fed diets without AGP would have an increased immune stimulation, and thus a higher TSAA requirement. Two studies were conducted to investigate the effect of increasing the standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on the growth performance of nursery pigs fed diets with or without AGP, and to determine the optimal SID TSAA:Lys in nursery pigs fed diets without AGP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment 1

The experiment was conducted at a commercial nursery research facility in central Missouri, USA. A total of 924 PIC 337 × 1050 nursery pigs at d 35 of age (BW = 7.9 ± 1.3 kg; PIC, Hendersonville, TN, USA) were used in this study. Pigs were weaned at d 21 of age (BW = 5.7 ± 1.1 kg) in a commercial sow farm and then moved to the commercial nursery research facility. Two common mash diets were fed to all pigs from d 0 to 7 and from d 7 to 14 (Table 1) post-weaning, respectively. On 14 d post-weaning, pigs were weighed and randomly allotted to 1 of 6 treatments according to a randomized complete block design, blocking by initial BW and balanced by sex in each pen, with 7 pens per treatment and 22 pigs per pen. Pigs were fed experimental diets from 14 to 35 d post-weaning. Two basal diets were formulated with or without the addition of 1.0% Mecadox 2.5 (50 mg/kg Carbodox; Phibro Animal Health Corp., Ridgefield Park, NJ). The basal diets were corn–soybean, meal-based diets formulated to meet or exceed NRC [12] recommendations for 11–25 kg pigs, except for SID Lys and SID TSAA. In the basal diets, the SID Lys was set for 1.10%, which were marginally deficient based on the estimated requirement for pigs under the proposed conditions (i.e., genotype and environment) for this study, whereas the SID TSAA was set at 0.55% (50% of SID Lys). Four additional diets were prepared by supplementing the basal diets with 2 levels of dry calcium salt of D, L-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid (HMTBa-Ca, 84% methionine activity, MHA, Novus International, Inc., St. Charles, MO) to produce diets with 0.64% and 0.73% SID TSAA (58.5 and 66% of SID TSAA:Lys, respectively; Table 1). The experimental diets were in mash form.

2.2. Experiment 2

The experiment was conducted at a commercial nursery research facility in central Missouri, USA. A total of 990 PIC 337 × 1050 weaned piglets (BW = 5.1 ± 0.9 kg; PIC, Hendersonville, TN, USA) were used in this study. A three-phase nursery feeding program (d 0–7, 7–21, and 21–42 post-weaning) was implemented in this study. No antibiotics were used in the diets and water. Pigs received their experimental diets in all three phases. Phase 1 and 2 diets were pelleted, whereas phase 3 diets were in mash form.
At the initiation of this study, piglets were weighed individually and allotted to 1 of 5 dietary treatments according to a randomized complete block design, blocked by initial BW and balanced by sex in each pen, with 9 pens per treatment and 22 pigs per pen. Five diets for each phase were formulated to meet the nutrient requirement of nursery pigs by PIC recommendation [13], except that SID Lys concentrations in each phase were reduced by 10% from the requirement to create Lys marginal deficiency, whereas SID TSAA to Lys ratios were set at 51%, 58%, 65%, 72%, and 79% by addition of HMTBa-Ca for 5 respective diets (Table 2).
Pen weights were measured at the initiation (d 0), and at the end of each phase (d 7, 21 and 42). Feed addition to each feeder was recorded each time when the feed was added to the feeder. At the end of each phase, remaining feed in the feeder was weighed. The ADG, ADFI, and G:F were calculated for each phase and the entire period.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

SAS® 9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc., Gary, NC, USA) was used for all data analyses. Pen served as the experimental unit. The LSMEANS statement was used to calculate the least square means. Tukey–Kramer adjustment was used for multiple comparisons of the least square means. Pooled SEM was calculated for each measurement. A probability of p ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant and 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10 was declared as a trend.
In Experiment 1, a GLIMMIX procedure was used to analyze data. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Antibiotics, SID TSAA:Lys, and their interactions were considered as the fixed effect, whereas block was the random effect. Polynomial contrasts were conducted to test linear, quadratic, and cubic effect of increasing SID TSAA to Lys ratios on growth performance.
In Experiment 2, GLIMMIX procedure was used to analyze data. Diet was considered as the fixed effect, whereas block was the random effect. Polynomial contrasts were conducted to test linear, quadratic and cubic effect of increasing SID TSAA to Lys ratios on growth performance. A broken-line linear ascending model (BLL), a broken-line quadratic ascending model (BLQ), and a quadratic polynomial model (QP) were fitted to the data for growth performance data to estimate the optimal TSAA to Lys ratios [14]. Correlated data structure and heterogenous error variance were accounted for in the three models. The best model was selected based on the maximum likelihood-based Bayesian information criterion (BIC), with BIC values greater than 2 considered a significant improvement in fit [15]. For the models with similar BIC values, the model with the narrowest 95% confidence interval (CI) was considered to be the best model.

3. Results

3.1. Experiment 1

The pigs fed diets supplemented with AGP had a higher (p < 0.05) final BW, ADG, and ADFI compared with those fed diets without AGP (Table 3). Under the condition of no AGP in the diets, increasing the SID TSAA:Lys from 51 to 66% resulted in a linear (p = 0.01) increase in ADG (Figure 1) and G:F (Figure 2). However, increasing SID TSAA:Lys from 51 to 66% did not affect (p > 0.10) ADG (Figure 1) and G:F (Figure 2) in the pigs fed diets containing AGP.

3.2. Experiment 2

3.2.1. SID TSAA to Lys Ratios on Growth Performance of Nursery Pigs Raised without Antibiotics

Increasing the SID TSAA:Lys tended to increase BW on d 21 (quadratic; p < 0.10), BW on d 42 (linear; p < 0.10; Table 4), ADG from d 0 to 21 (quadratic; p < 0.10), ADFI from d 7 to 21 (quadratic; p < 0.10), and ADFI from d 0 to 42 (quadratic; p < 0.10). Similarly, ADG from d 7 to 21 and ADG from d 0 to 42 were increased in quadratic (p < 0.05) and linear (p < 0.05) manners with increase in SID TSAA:Lys, respectively.

3.2.2. Estimation of Optimal Ratio of SID TSAA to Lys in Nursery Pigs Raised without Antibiotics

Three different dose–response models were fitted to estimate the optimal ratio of SID TSAA to Lys in nursery pigs under ABF. The average daily gains and G:F from d 0 to 21 and d 21 to 42 were used as the response criteria for model estimation.
For the average daily gain from d 0 to 21, the BLL model showed the best fit (BIC = 406.9), compared with the QP (BIC = 444.28) and BLQ (BIC = 409.1) models. The maximum ADG from d 0 to 21 was obtained as 62% SID TSAA to Lys (95% CI: [42, 82%]). The estimated regression equations for the best fitting BLL model (Figure 3) were:
ADG   = 268.47 115.79 × 0.62 TSAA   to   Lys ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys   < 0.62 ADG = 268.47 ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys     0.62
For the gain to feed ratio from d 0 to 21 (g/kg), BLL, BLQ, and QP models all showed similar fits (BIC = 477.4, 477.2 and 477.9, respectively). However, BLL model has a narrower 95% confidence interval compared with the other two models, therefore BLL model was selected as the best model. The maximum gain to feed ratio from d 0 to 21 was obtained at 72% SID TSAA to Lys (95% CI: [71.8, 72.2%]). The estimated regression equations for the best fitting BLL model (Figure 4) were:
G : F   = 883.97 206.57 × 0.72 TSAA   to   Lys ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys   < 0.72 G : F = 883.97 ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys     0.72
For average daily gain from d 21 to 42, BLL model showed the best fit (BIC = 428.6), compared with QP (BIC = 429.5) and BLQ (BIC = 430.8) models. The maximum ADG from d 21 to 42 was obtained at 59% SID TSAA to Lys (95% CI: [47, 70%]). The estimated regression equations for the best fitting BLL model (Figure 5) were:
ADG   = 527.13 205.05 × 0.59 TSAA   to   Lys ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys   < 0.59 ADG = 527.13 ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys     0.59
For the gain to feed ratio from d 21 to 42 (g/kg), the BLL model showed the best fit (BIC = 472.2), compared with the QP (BIC = 473.03) and BLQ (BIC = 474.4) models. The maximum gain to feed ratio from d 21 to 42 was obtained at 58% SID TSAA to Lys (95% CI: [57.8, 58.2%]). The estimated regression equations for the best fitting BLL model (Figure 6) were:
G : F   = 724.17 275.55 × 0.58 TSAA   to   Lys ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys   < 0.58 G : F = 724.17 ,   if   SID   TSAA   to   Lys     0.58

4. Discussion

4.1. Antibiotics Growth Promoter on Growth Performance and Amino Acid Requirement

Antibiotic growth promoters have been used in monogastric diets for decades to control disease and improve growth performance. Cromwell [16] demonstrated that AGP improved the growth rate and feed efficiency by 16.4 and 6.9% in nursery pigs by conducting a meta-analysis based on 1000 pig growth studies, respectively. Similarly, in a meta-analysis based on 183 broiler studies, Cardinal et al. [17] reported that AGP improved weight gain and feed efficiency from d 1 to 42 by 3.9% and 3.5%, respectively. The weight gain response by AGP in our first study was consistent with previous findings, even though the feed efficiency benefit of AGP was not observed. The exact modes of action regarding how AGP can improve growth performance are not well understood. It was demonstrated that AGP supplementation in the diets could reduce total number of gut bacteria and the number of bacteria species [18], reduce the thickness of the gut wall and villus lamina propria [19], increase amino acid absorption by enhancing jejunum and ileum amino acid transporters [20,21], reduce inflammation, and change whole-body protein metabolism [22]; however, it may not affect the intestinal permeability and fiber fermentation [22,23].
The phenomenon that increasing SID TSAA:Lys from 51 to 66% in the presence of AGP did not impact growth performance in the current study for pigs from 8 to 16 kg may be due to the fact that SID TSAA:Lys at 51% might already meet the requirement with the presence of AGP. However, with the removal of AGP from the diets, the lack of enteric pathogen control could stimulate immune system activation, and thus more nutrients could be diverted from growth to support immune function [8]. As a result, the optimal SID TSAA:Lys was increased when AGP was not present in the diets. Similarly, the Trp or Thr requirements of the pigs were higher when pigs were fed diets without AGP compared with diets containing antibiotics [9,10]. It was also shown that SID TSAA:Lys increased in nursery pigs challenged with a pathogenic strain of E. coli [11].

4.2. Function of Methionine and Increased Methionine Requirement without AGP

Increasing evidence suggests that the sulfur amino acids, Met and Cys, are essential in numerous biological functions and diseases, as well as their role in protein synthesis. For instance, Met plays an important role in cellular antioxidant functions. Methionine can be converted to Cys via cystathionine through the transmethylation and trans-sulfuration pathways [2]. Cysteine plays an important role in cellular redox function and managing oxidative stress in the intestine [24,25]. Cysteine is a constituent amino acid of the tripeptide glutathione (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly), the major cellular antioxidant in mammals, and also serves as a precursor for the synthesis of taurine, sulfate, and coenzyme A [2]. Glutathione has a critical role in cellular detoxification against oxidative and chemical injury [26]. Additionally, Met can function as an antioxidant agent [27]. Numerous reactive oxygen species react readily with methionine residues in proteins to form methionine sulfoxide, which can be catalyzed by methionine sulfoxide reductase back into methionine, therefore scavenging the reactive oxygen species [4,27]. Maintaining a normal redox status is particularly important for intestinal epithelial cells, which are constantly exposed to high levels of oxidative stress due to high rates of oxidative metabolism [28]. Studies in intestinal epithelial cells indicate that the increased oxidative stress and redox imbalance can suppress cell proliferation and induce apoptosis [29,30,31].
Studies demonstrated that about 20 to 30% of dietary Met intake was metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract of infant pigs, and that much of the Met used by the gut was metabolized via the transmethylation and trans-sulfuration pathways [32,33]. As a result, Met requirement was about 30% higher in the enterally fed than in the parenterally fed piglets, reinforcing the important first-pass metabolic demand of the gut [33]. Therefore, an adequate Met intake is required to maximize the growth performance of pigs. Bauchart-Thevret et al. [7] reported that sulfur amino acid deficiency upregulated intestinal methionine cycle activity and suppressed epithelial growth in neonatal piglets. It was also demonstrated that nursery pigs fed diets without antibiotics had an increased oxidative stress compared with those fed diets with antibiotics [34]. It was probable that the piglets fed diets containing SID TSAA:Lys between 51.0 to 58.5% without AGP in our first study were deficient in Met; therefore, a higher level of SID TSAA:Lys was required to optimize the growth performance in nursery pigs fed diets without AGP, which was confirmed in the second study.

4.3. Optimal SID TSAA:Lys in Nursery Pigs without AGP

Methionine is the second or third limiting amino acid in corn–soybean, meal-based diets for pigs [1]. The supplemental types of Met used in animal diets are DL-Met, L-Met and HMTBa [1,35]. Numerous studies showed that HMTBa had a similar or better absorption rate compared with DL-Met and L-Met [36,37], which was mainly driven by the passive diffusion pathway for HMTBa versus the energy-dependent pathways for DL-Met and L-Met. Previous studies also demonstrated that HMTBa had similar bioefficiency compared with DL-Met and L-Met in pigs [1,38], despite some inconsistent findings from other studies [39,40]. Therefore, the optimal levels of SID TSAA:Lys in pigs fed diets containing one of these three Met sources may be similar.
It is reported that weaned pigs exhibited an increased intestinal permeability that was most pronounced at 24 h post-weaning and then gradually declined over the first 2 weeks post-weaning, compared with age-matched and non-weaned littermates [41]. At the same time, weaning in piglets was associated with an upregulation of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine [42]. It was also shown that sulfur amino acid played an important role in the innate immune system and stimulating humoral and cell-mediated immune responses [43,44]. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to report the increased SID TSAA:Lys requirements for nursery pigs fed diets without AGP. The optimal SID TSAA:Lys was 62% and 72% for ADG and G:F during the first 21 d post-weaning, respectively, which may be explained by the fact that the weaning stress and the associated immune system stimulation would increase sulfur amino acid requirements to manage oxidative stress and inflammation. Similarly, Capozzalo et al. [11] demonstrated that ADG and G:F were optimized at 71% and 68% in the weaning pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic E. coli, respectively. It was also shown that 65.9% and 63.4% SID TSAA:Lys were required to optimize the jejunum villus height and plasma urea nitrogen in weaning pigs under unclean sanitary conditions [45]. In the late nursery period (from d 21 to 42), due to the improved intestinal integrity and immune systems, SID TSAA:Lys of approximately 58% was needed to optimize growth performance.

5. Conclusions

Nursery pigs fed diets containing no AGP had a greater requirement of SID TSAA:Lys than those fed diets containing AGP. The optimal SID TSAA:Lys for ADG and G:F in nursery pigs during the first 21 d post-weaning were 62% and 72%, respectively, indicating that SID TSAA:Lys under an antibiotic-free regime in the early nursery period was 13 to 31% greater than the NRC (2012) recommendation. However, an SID TSAA:Lys of approximately 58% was required to maximize ADG and G:F for the late nursery phase, indicating that SID TSAA:Lys under an antibiotic-free regime in the late nursery period was 5% higher than the NRC (2012) recommendation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, P.R., F.A., U.O., M.G., M.V.-A.; Formal analysis, P.R., F.A.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.; writing—review and editing, P.R., F.A., U.O., M.G., D.H., M.V.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The first study was funded by Novus International, Inc. and PIC with 50% from each company; the second study was funded by Novus International, Inc.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was not required for the two experiments. The animals used in these two experiments were intended as meat production animals in an agricultural setting. According to the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), agricultural study animals used in the production of food and/or fiber are excluded from coverage under the AWA and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) oversight and facility registration.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in these two studies are available from the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mathew Deeker and Jeremy Webb from the feed mill at Green Acres Research and Testing Facility (a Novus International, Inc. facility, Montgomery City, MO, USA) for the support with purchasing feed ingredients and making diets.

Conflicts of Interest

Ping Ren, Deana Hancock, and Mercedes Vazquez-Añón are employees of Novus International, Inc. Ferdinando Almeida is the previous employee of Novus International, Inc. Uislei Orlando, and Marcio Gonçalves declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yi, G.F.; Gaines, A.M.; Ratliff, B.W.; Srichana, P.; Allee, G.L.; Perryman, K.R.; Knight, C.D. Estimation of the true ileal digestible lysine and sulfur amino acid requirement and comparison of the bioefficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and DL-methionine in eleven- to twenty-six-kilogram nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 1709–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stipanuk, M.H. Sulfur amino acid metabolism: Pathways for production and removal of homocysteine and cysteine. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2004, 24, 539–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Finkelstein, J.D. Methionine metabolism in mammals. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1990, 1, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luo, S.; Levine, R.L. Methionine in proteins defends against oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Swain, B.K.; Johri, T.S. Effect of supplemental methionine, choline and their combinations on the performance and immune response of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carew, L.B.; McMurtry, J.P.; Alster, F.A. Effects of methionine deficiencies on plasma levels of thyroid hormones, insulin-like growth factors-I and -II, liver and body weights, and feed intake in growing chickens. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 1932–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bauchart-Thevret, C.; Stoll, B.; Chacko, S.; Burrin, D.G. Sulfur amino acid deficiency upregulates intestinal methionine cycle activity and suppresses epithelial growth in neonatal pigs. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 296, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Moretó, M.; Miró, L.; Amat, C.; Polo, J.; Manichanh, C.; Pérez-Bosque, A. Dietary supplementation with spray-dried porcine plasma has prebiotic effects on gut microbiota in mice. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Becker, D.E.; Notzold, R.A.; Jensen, A.H. The tryptophan requirement of the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 1955, 14, 664–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bikker, P.; Dirkzwager, A. Withdrawal of antimicrobial growth promoters from pig diets increases the amino acid requirements for growth performance. In Progress in Research on Energy and Protein Metabolism; Souffrant, W.B., Metges, C., Eds.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 593–596. [Google Scholar]
  11. Capozzalo, M.M.; Resink, J.W.; Htoo, J.K.; Kim, J.C.; de Lange, F.M.; Mullan, B.P.; Hansen, C.F.; Pluske, J.R. Determination of the optimum standardised ileal digestible sulphur amino acids to lysine ratio in weaned pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 227, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; ISBN 9780309489034. [Google Scholar]
  13. PIC. Nutrient Specifications Manual; PIC North America: Hendersonville, TN, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonçalves, M.A.D.; Gourley, K.M.; Dritz, S.S.; Tokach, M.D.; Bello, N.M.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Woodworth, J.C.; Goodband, R.D. Effects of amino acids and energy intake during late gestation of high-performing gilts and sows on litter and reproductive performance under commercial conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 1993–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Milliken, G.A.; Johnson, D.E. Analysis of Messy Data: Designed Experiments, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; Volume 1, ISBN 1584883340. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cromwell, G.L. Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 7–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Maria Cardinal, K.; Kipper, M.; Andretta, I.; Machado Leal Ribeiro, A. Withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters from broiler diets: Performance indexes and economic impact. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6659–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Collier, C.T.; Smiricky-Tjardes, M.R.; Albin, D.M.; Wubben, J.E.; Gabert, V.M.; Deplancke, B.; Bane, D.; Anderson, D.B.; Gaskins, H.R. Molecular ecological analysis of porcine ileal microbiota responses to antimicrobial growth promoters. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 3035–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Anderson, D.B.; McCracken, V.J.; Aminov, R.I.; Simpson, J.M.; Mackie, R.I.; Verstegen, M.W.A.; Gaskins, H.R. Gut microbiology and growth-promoting antibiotics in swine. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B Livest. Feed. Feed. 2000, 70, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mu, C.; Yang, Y.; Yu, K.; Yu, M.; Zhang, C.; Su, Y.; Zhu, W. Alteration of metabolomic markers of amino-acid metabolism in piglets with in-feed antibiotics. Amino Acids 2017, 49, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yu, M.; Mu, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Su, Y.; Huang, Z.; Yu, K.; Zhu, W. Increases in circulating amino acids with in-feed antibiotics correlated with gene expression of intestinal amino acid transporters in piglets. Amino Acids 2017, 49, 1587–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Helm, E.T.; Curry, S.; Trachsel, J.M.; Schroyen, M.; Gabler, N.K. Evaluating nursery pig responses to in-feed sub-therapeutic antibiotics. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yu, M.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Mu, C.; Su, Y.; Yu, K.; Zhu, W. Long-term effects of early antibiotic intervention on blood parameters, apparent nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbial fermentation profile in pigs with different dietary protein levels. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deplancke, B.; Gaskins, H.R. Redox control of the transsulfuration and glutathione biosynthesis pathways. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2002, 5, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jones, D.P. Extracellular redox state: Refining the definition of oxidative stress in aging. Rejuvenation Res. 2006, 9, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, G.; Fang, Y.Z.; Yang, S.; Lupton, J.R.; Turner, N.D. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Levine, R.L.; Mosoni, L.; Berlett, B.S.; Stadtman, E.R. Methionine residues as endogenous antioxidants in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15036–15040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Circu, M.L.; Aw, T.Y. Intestinal redox biology and oxidative stress. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23, 729–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Aw, T.Y. Cellular redox: A modulator of intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. News Physiol. Sci. 2003, 18, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Noda, T.; Iwakiri, R.; Fujimoto, K.; Aw, T.Y. Induction of mild intracellular redox imbalance inhibits proliferation of CaCo-2 cells. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 2131–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pias, E.K.; Yee Aw, T. Apoptosis in mitotic competent undifferentiated cells is induced by cellular redox imbalance independent of reactive oxygen species production. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Riedijk, M.A.; Stoll, B.; Chacko, S.; Schierbeek, H.; Sunehag, A.L.; Van Goudoever, J.B.; Burrin, D.G. Methionine transmethylation and transsulfuration in the piglet gastrointestinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 3408–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Shoveller, A.K.; Brunton, J.A.; Pencharz, P.B.; Ball, R.O. The methionine requirement is lower in neonatal piglets fed parenterally than in those fed enterally. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1390–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, Y.T.; Liu, L.; Long, S.F.; Pan, L.; Piao, X.S. Effect of organic acids and essential oils on performance, intestinal health and digestive enzyme activities of weaned pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 235, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shen, Y.B.; Weaver, A.C.; Kim, S.W. Effect of feed grade L-methionine on growth performance and gut health in nursery pigs compared with conventional DL-methionine. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 5530–5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Knight, C.D.; Dibner, J.J. Comparative absorption of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid and L-methionine in the broiler chick. J. Nutr. 1984, 114, 2179–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Richards, J.D.; Atwell, C.A.; Vázquez-Añón, M.; Dibner, J.J. Comparative in vitro and in vivo absorption of 2-hydroxy-4(methylthio) butanoic acid and methionine in the broiler chicken. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Knight, C.D.; Atwell, C.A.; Wuelling, C.W.; Ivey, F.J.; Dibner, J.J. The Relative Effectiveness of 2-Hydroxy-4-(Methylthio) Butanoic Acid and DL-Methionine in Young Swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zimmermann, B.; Mosenthin, R.; Rademacher, M.; Lynch, P.B.; Esteve-Garcia, E. Comparative studies on the relative efficacy of DL-methionine and liquid methionine hydroxy analogue in growing pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, B.G.; Lindemann, M.D.; Rademacher, M.; Brennan, J.J.; Cromwell, G.L. Efficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid and DL-methionine as methionine sources for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Moeser, A.J.; Vander Klok, C.; Ryan, K.A.; Wooten, J.G.; Little, D.; Cook, V.L.; Blikslager, A.T. Stress signaling pathways activated by weaning mediate intestinal dysfunction in the pig. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007, 292, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pié, S.; Lallès, J.P.; Blazy, F.; Laffitte, J.; Sève, B.; Oswald, I.P. Weaning Is Associated with an Upregulation of Expression of Inflamatory Cytokines in the Intestine of Piglets. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hunter, E.A.L.; Grimble, R.F. Cysteine and methionine supplementation modulate the effect of tumor necrosis factor α on protein synthesis, glutathione and zinc concentration of liver and lung in rats fed a low protein diet. J. Nutr. 1994, 124, 2319–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Grimble, R.F. The effects of sulfur amino acid intake on immune function in humans. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1660–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kahindi, R.; Regassa, A.; Htoo, J.; Nyachoti, M. Optimal sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio for post weaning piglets reared under clean or unclean sanitary conditions. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on average daily gain of nursery pigs from d 14 to 35 (orthogonal contrast analysis).
Figure 1. Effect of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on average daily gain of nursery pigs from d 14 to 35 (orthogonal contrast analysis).
Animals 11 03143 g001
Figure 2. Effect of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on gain to feed ratio of nursery pigs from d 14 to 35 (orthogonal contrast analysis).
Figure 2. Effect of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on gain to feed ratio of nursery pigs from d 14 to 35 (orthogonal contrast analysis).
Animals 11 03143 g002
Figure 3. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for average daily gain from d 0 to 21.
Figure 3. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for average daily gain from d 0 to 21.
Animals 11 03143 g003
Figure 4. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for gain to feed from d 0 to 21.
Figure 4. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for gain to feed from d 0 to 21.
Animals 11 03143 g004
Figure 5. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for average daily gain from d 21 to 42.
Figure 5. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for average daily gain from d 21 to 42.
Animals 11 03143 g005
Figure 6. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for gain to feed from d 21 to 42.
Figure 6. Broken-line linear ascending model for estimation of optimal SID TSAA to Lys ratio in nursery pigs under ABF for gain to feed from d 21 to 42.
Animals 11 03143 g006
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of common diet in phases 1 and 2, and basal diets for phase 3 with 51% standardized ileal digestible total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (Experiment 1; as-fed basis).
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of common diet in phases 1 and 2, and basal diets for phase 3 with 51% standardized ileal digestible total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (Experiment 1; as-fed basis).
P1P2P3
Ingredients no AGP-51% 1AGP-51% 1
Corn, yellow dent38.7156.7064.4862.77
Soybean meal, 47.5% CP15.0025.0031.0031.00
Whey, dried30.008.200.000.00
Plasma spray-dried7.000.000.000.00
Fish meal, menhaden5.157.000.000.00
L-lysine HCl0.190.260.210.21
L-threonine0.040.080.110.12
MHA 20.190.160.000.00
L-tryptophan0.020.040.000.03
Choice white grease1.830.321.001.70
Monocalcium phosphate 21%0.170.250.980.97
Limestone0.550.721.111.10
Salt0.250.490.610.60
Mecadox 2.5 (0.55%)0.000.000.001.00
Vitamin and mineral premix 30.500.500.500.50
Zinc oxide, 72% Zn0.400.280.000.00
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00
Nutrient composition
ME 4, kcal/kg3395330734023402
CP 4, %23.9021.8020.3020.30
SID 5, %
Lys1.471.311.101.10
Thr0.880.790.740.74
Met0.470.480.280.28
Met+Cys0.850.760.560.56
Trp0.290.260.220.22
Ca, %0.850.850.750.75
STTD 6 P, %0.530.400.330.33
1 Fifty-one percent represented standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys). The experimental diets with 58.5% and 66% SID TSAA:Lys were made by adding 0.10% and 0.20% MHA in the basal diets, respectively. 2 MHA is dry calcium salt of D, L-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid (84% Met activity, MHA, Novus International, Inc., St. Charles, MO, USA). 3 Vitamin and mineral premix supplied the following nutrients per kilogram of diets: vitamin A, 11,000 IU; vitamin D, 1760 IU; vitamin E, 83.6 IU; vitamin K, 5.5 mg; thiamine, 3.52 mg; riboflavin, 13.2 mg; niacin, 70.4 mg; pantothenic acid, 39.6 mg; pyridoxine, 7.04 mg; folic acid, 1045 µg; biotin, 275 µg; vitamin B12, 55 µg; Zn, 120 mg as zinc sulphate; Cu, 12 mg as copper; Mn, 30 mg as manganese sulphate; Fe, 80 mg as ferrous sulphate; I, 0.4 mg as ethylenediamine dihydriodide; and Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite. 4 ME and CP represented metabolizable energy and crude protein, respectively. 5 SID = standardized ileal digestible. 6 STTD = standardized total tract digestible.
Table 2. Ingredient and nutrient composition of phase 1 (d 0–7), phase 2 (d 7–21), and phase 3 (d 21–42) basal diets with 51% standardized ileal digestible total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (Experiment 2; as-fed basis).
Table 2. Ingredient and nutrient composition of phase 1 (d 0–7), phase 2 (d 7–21), and phase 3 (d 21–42) basal diets with 51% standardized ileal digestible total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (Experiment 2; as-fed basis).
IngredientsP1-51% 1P2-51% 2P3-51% 3
Corn, yellow dent20.7436.3963.15
Oat groats20.0015.000.00
Soybean meal, 47.5% CP15.0020.0031.00
HP300 42.505.000.00
Whey powder30.0015.000.00
Plasma spray-dried4.002.000.00
Fish meal3.001.500.00
Soy oil2.002.000.00
Choice white grease0.000.002.50
Dicalcium phosphate 18.5%1.051.051.65
Limestone0.540.760.50
Salt0.300.300.30
Vitamin premix 50.110.110.11
Mineral premix 50.290.290.29
ZnO, 72% Zn0.280.280.00
L-lysine HCl0.150.230.34
MHA 60.040.050.06
L-threonine0.000.040.09
L-tryptophan0.000.000.01
Total100.00100.00100.00
Nutrient composition
ME 7, kcal/kg347834543404
CP 7, %21.721.9120.46
Fermentable fiber, %8.5110.4912.13
SID 8, %
Lys1.311.281.20
Thr0.790.770.72
Met0.320.330.33
Met+Cys0.670.650.61
Trp0.270.250.23
Ca, %0.850.790.70
Total P, %0.810.710.70
STTD 9 P, %0.570.440.39
1 P1-51% represented phase 1 basal diet with standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) at 51%. The phase 1 experimental diets with 58%, 65%, 72%, and 79% SID TSAA:Lys were made by adding 0.10%, 0.21%, 0.31%, and 0.42% MHA in the basal diet, respectively. 2 P2-51% represented phase 2 basal diet with standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) at 51%. The phase 2 experimental diets with 58%, 65%, 72%, and 79% SID TSAA:Lys were made by adding 0.10%, 0.21%, 0.32%, and 0.42% MHA in the basal diet, respectively. 3 P3-51% represented phase 3 basal diet with standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acid to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) at 51%. The phase 3 experimental diets with 58%, 65%, 72%, and 79% SID TSAA:Lys were made by adding 0.11%, 0.20%, 0.31%, and 0.41% MHA in the basal diet, respectively. 4 HP300 (Hamlet Protein, Findlay, OH, USA) was produced by treating conventional dehulled soybean meal with a proprietary mixture of enzymes to reduce concentrations of oligosaccharides and anti-nutrient factors. 5 Vitamin premix supplied the following nutrients per kilogram of diets: vitamin A, 11,000 IU; vitamin D, 1760 IU; vitamin E, 83.6 IU; vitamin K, 5.5 mg; thiamine, 3.52 mg; riboflavin, 13.2 mg; niacin, 70.4 mg; pantothenic acid, 39.6 mg; pyridoxine, 7.04 mg; folic acid, 1045 µg; biotin, 275 µg; vitamin B12, 55 µg. Mineral premix supplied the following nutrients per kilogram of diet: Zn, 120 mg as zinc sulphate; Cu, 12 mg as copper; Mn, 30 mg as manganese sulphate; Fe, 80 mg as ferrous sulphate; I, 0.4 mg as ethylenediamine dihydriodide; and Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite. 6 MHA is dry calcium salt of D, L-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid (84% Met activity, MHA, Novus International, Inc., St. Charles, MO, USA). 7 ME and CP represented metabolizable energy and crude protein, respectively. 8 SID = standardized ileal digestible. 9 STTD = standardized total tract digestible.
Table 3. Effect of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on growth performance of nursery pigs (factorial analysis, Experiment 1).
Table 3. Effect of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) and standardized ileal digestible (SID) total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratio (TSAA:Lys) on growth performance of nursery pigs (factorial analysis, Experiment 1).
AGPSID TSAA:Lys, % p-Value
ItemsNoYes5158.566SEMAGPTSAAAGP × TSAA
Initial BW, kg7.97.97.98.07.90.10.850.910.50
Final BW, kg16.316.716.116.516.80.20.030.030.39
ADG, g/d39741739140942190.010.010.39
ADFI, g/d61664761663364512<0.010.060.96
G:F, g/g0.6430.6450.6340.6450.6530.0090.830.060.08
BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G:F, gain to feed ratio.
Table 4. Effect of increasing standardized ileal digestible total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratios on growth performance of nursery pigs raised without antibiotics (Experiment 2).
Table 4. Effect of increasing standardized ileal digestible total sulfur amino acids to lysine ratios on growth performance of nursery pigs raised without antibiotics (Experiment 2).
SID TSAA:Lys, % p-Value
Items5158657279SEMDietLinearQuadraticCubic
BW, kg
d 05.15.15.15.15.1<.010.910.850.430.71
d 76.66.66.66.56.60.10.940.770.600.53
d 2110.510.610.810.810.60.10.300.190.090.76
d 4221.221.721.921.621.90.20.020.090.190.30
ADG, g/d
d 0 to 721121420920821880.930.770.580.50
d 7 to 2127828930230228770.070.150.010.42
d 21 to 4251152653251653580.230.330.710.26
d 0 to 2125626427127126460.310.190.090.77
d 0 to 4238439540139440140.020.010.150.10
ADFI, g/d
d 0 to 723724023223623560.940.680.870.80
d 7 to 21325351351340335110.450.840.090.39
d 21 to 4272871874873772190.140.860.370.15
d 0 to 2129631431130530180.540.950.140.39
d 0 to 4251151452452051160.400.710.090.50
G:F, g/g
d 0 to 70.8890.8940.9000.8800.9240.0230.730.450.560.39
d 7 to 210.8370.8300.8630.9000.8680.0210.160.290.950.08
d 21 to 420.7070.7360.7210.7020.7460.0140.180.460.730.08
d 0 to 210.8460.8430.8730.8960.8650.0120.030.120.900.09
d 0 to 420.7540.7700.7660.7580.7670.0110.850.300.770.21
BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G:F, gain to feed ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, P.; Almeida, F.; Orlando, U.; Gonçalves, M.; Hancock, D.; Vazquez-Añón, M. Optimal Standardized Ileal Digestible Total Sulfur Amino Acids to Lysine REQUIREMENTS Are Increased in Nursery Pigs Raised under Antibiotic-Free Feeding Regime. Animals 2021, 11, 3143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113143

AMA Style

Ren P, Almeida F, Orlando U, Gonçalves M, Hancock D, Vazquez-Añón M. Optimal Standardized Ileal Digestible Total Sulfur Amino Acids to Lysine REQUIREMENTS Are Increased in Nursery Pigs Raised under Antibiotic-Free Feeding Regime. Animals. 2021; 11(11):3143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Ping, Ferdinando Almeida, Uislei Orlando, Marcio Gonçalves, Deana Hancock, and Mercedes Vazquez-Añón. 2021. "Optimal Standardized Ileal Digestible Total Sulfur Amino Acids to Lysine REQUIREMENTS Are Increased in Nursery Pigs Raised under Antibiotic-Free Feeding Regime" Animals 11, no. 11: 3143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop