Anti-Classical Swine Fever Virus Strategies

Classical swine fever (CSF), caused by CSF virus (CSFV), is a highly contagious swine disease with high morbidity and mortality, which has caused significant economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. Biosecurity measures and vaccination are the main methods for prevention and control of CSF since no specific drug is available for the effective treatment of CSF. Although a series of biosecurity and vaccination strategies have been developed to curb the outbreak events, it is still difficult to eliminate CSF in CSF-endemic and re-emerging areas. Thus, in addition to implementing enhanced biosecurity measures and exploring more effective CSF vaccines, other strategies are also needed for effectively controlling CSF. Currently, more and more research about anti-CSFV strategies was carried out by scientists, because of the great prospects and value of anti-CSFV strategies in the prevention and control of CSF. Additionally, studies on anti-CSFV strategies could be used as a reference for other viruses in the Flaviviridae family, such as hepatitis C virus, dengue virus, and Zika virus. In this review, we aim to summarize the research on anti-CSFV strategies. In detail, host proteins affecting CSFV replication, drug candidates with anti-CSFV effects, and RNA interference (RNAi) targeting CSFV viral genes were mentioned and the possible mechanisms related to anti-CSFV effects were also summarized.


Introduction
Classical swine fever (CSF) is a highly contagious swine disease characterized by high fever, multiple hemorrhages, and gastrointestinal symptoms with high morbidity and mortality, which has caused significant economic losses to the pig industry worldwide [1]. CSF in wild boars is also endemic in some countries, which poses a serious threat to domestic pigs [2]. The causative agent of CSF is the CSF virus (CSFV), an important member of the Pestivirus genus within the Flaviviridae family. CSFV is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus containing a 12.3 kb RNA genome, which consists of a 5 -untranslated region (5 -UTR), a single large open reading frame (ORF), and a 3 -UTR. A polypeptide precursor could be encoded by ORF of CSFV and then cleaved into four structural proteins (C, E rns , E1, and E2) and eight non-structural proteins (N pro , p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B) through the processing of the polypeptide precursor by viral and cellular proteases ( Figure 1) [1,3,4].  [4]. This figure comes from the literature reported by Beer et al. [4] with some modifications. CSFV is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. Glycoproteins (E rns , E1, and E2) are located on the external part of viral particles and are important for viral infection. CSFV RNA genome consists of a single large open reading frame (ORF) flanked by a 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) and a 3′-UTR. A polypeptide precursor could be encoded by ORF of CSFV and then cleaved into four structural proteins (C, E rns , E1, and E2) and eight non-structural proteins (N pro , p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B).
CSFV strains' virulence, ranging from high, moderate, to low virulence, is the crucial determinant of CSFV pathogenicity in pigs. CSFV infection can lead to an acute, subacute, chronic, or asymptomatic disease in pigs depending on CSFV strains' virulence and other factors, such as the host's age and immune status [15]. Although CSFV strains with different virulence exist globally, more and more reports show that the currently circulating strains are mainly moderately virulent [16][17][18][19].
Currently, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) lists 38 CSF-free members, which mainly locate in North America, part of South America, Oceania, and a large part of the European Union. CSF is still endemic in Asia, South and Central America, Eastern Europe, and parts of Africa. Additionally, specific zones in Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador are declared CSF-free by OIE, while the other zones in these countries remain CSFendemic [20]. Additionally, there is a risk of CSF re-emergence in CSF-free areas due to the existence of CSF-endemic regions in the world, as well as the reservoir of CSFV in wild boars. For instance, in 2018, CSF re-emerged in Japan after 26 years of CSF-free status, affecting both domestic pigs and wild boars [12]. Thus, as an endemic and re-emerging virus in pigs, CSFV is still a threat to the world's pig industry.  [4]. This figure comes from the literature reported by Beer et al. [4] with some modifications. CSFV is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. Glycoproteins (E rns , E1, and E2) are located on the external part of viral particles and are important for viral infection. CSFV RNA genome consists of a single large open reading frame (ORF) flanked by a 5 -untranslated region (5 -UTR) and a 3 -UTR. A polypeptide precursor could be encoded by ORF of CSFV and then cleaved into four structural proteins (C, E rns , E1, and E2) and eight non-structural proteins (N pro , p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B).
CSFV strains' virulence, ranging from high, moderate, to low virulence, is the crucial determinant of CSFV pathogenicity in pigs. CSFV infection can lead to an acute, subacute, chronic, or asymptomatic disease in pigs depending on CSFV strains' virulence and other factors, such as the host's age and immune status [15]. Although CSFV strains with different virulence exist globally, more and more reports show that the currently circulating strains are mainly moderately virulent [16][17][18][19].
Currently, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) lists 38 CSF-free members, which mainly locate in North America, part of South America, Oceania, and a large part of the European Union. CSF is still endemic in Asia, South and Central America, Eastern Europe, and parts of Africa. Additionally, specific zones in Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador are declared CSF-free by OIE, while the other zones in these countries remain CSF-endemic [20]. Additionally, there is a risk of CSF re-emergence in CSF-free areas due to the existence of CSF-endemic regions in the world, as well as the reservoir of CSFV in wild boars. For instance, in 2018, CSF re-emerged in Japan after 26 years of CSF-free status, affecting both domestic pigs and wild boars [12]. Thus, as an endemic and re-emerging virus in pigs, CSFV is still a threat to the world's pig industry.
Biosecurity measures are crucial for preventing and controlling CSF. According to the guidance of OIE, strict sanitary prophylaxis is the first barrier to prevent CSF outbreaks [21]. In brief, some key points could be employed, such as maintaining effective communication between veterinary authorities, veterinary practitioners, and pig farmers, establishing a reliable disease reporting system, implementing strict quarantine, and enhancing hygiene measures to prevent contact between domestic pigs and wild boars [21]. Laboratory diagnostic techniques are also needed. Rapid and sensitive detection methods for CSFV infection, such as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [22], SYBR Green or TaqMan real-time RT-PCR [23,24], and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) [25], are crucial to informing the appropriate control measures. Additionally, due to that wild boars are susceptible to CSFV, eradication of CSF from wild boars is of epidemiologic value, which can prevent the spread of CSFV from wild boars to domestic pigs [2]. If CSF outbreaks occur, strict measures must be implemented to curb the epidemic. For example, suspected and infected pig herds must be slaughtered and animal carcasses should be buried or incinerated; thorough disinfection is also needed; infected zones must be designated and then pig movements should be restricted [21].
Currently, prophylactic vaccination is still the primary strategy for preventing and controlling CSF in CSF-endemic regions. Traditional CSF live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) strains, such as C-strain, LPC strain, LK-VNIVViM strain, GPE-strain, Thiverval strain, and PAV-250 strain, could provide an effective, rapid, and solid immune protection against CSFV infection and have been widely used to fight CSF [26]. Although traditional LAVs are effective and safe, they lack a serological concept of differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA). They thus are not conducive to CSF eradication in CSF-endemic areas. Therefore, it is necessary to develop CSF marker vaccines with DIVA capabilities. Currently, many efforts have been performed to develop novel CSF marker vaccines. Holinka et al. [27] reported that FlagT4Gv, a live attenuated marker vaccine, could induce protection against challenge with virulent CSFV as early as three days post-vaccination and an increase of IFN-α three days after FlagT4Gv vaccination might play an important role in the immune protection, which meant that a novel CSF LAV with DIVA capabilities was a good choice for CSF control. Additionally, in recent years, novel subunit marker vaccines based on the CSFV E2 protein have been developed for alternative options against CSF [26]. For example, a commercial CSF marker vaccine TWJ-E2 ® (Tecon Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Urumqi, China), containing a baculovirus-expressed E2 glycoprotein of vaccine C-strain of genotype 1.1, was reported to provide complete protection to pigs against lethal challenge with virulent Shimen strain of genotype 1.1 and heterologous strains of genotype 2 [28,29].
Despite decades of efforts, it is still difficult to eliminate CSF in endemically affected regions and re-emerging areas [30,31]. The emergence of moderate or attenuated CSFV strains results in persistent recessive infection and immunosuppression in pigs, making it more challenging to control CSF [32,33]. Thus, in addition to implementing enhanced biosecurity measures and exploring more effective CSF vaccines, other strategies are also needed for effectively controlling CSF. Currently, more and more research about anti-CSFV strategies was carried out by scientists, because of the great prospects and value of anti-CSFV strategies in the prevention and control of CSF. In this article, we aim to introduce the research progress of anti-CSFV strategies. In detail, host proteins with anti-CSFV effects, host proteins whose function defect exert anti-CSFV effects, drug candidates with anti-CSFV effects, and RNA interference (RNAi) targeting CSFV viral genes were mentioned and the possible mechanisms related to anti-CSFV effects were summarized.
Since host proteins mentioned above can inhibit CSFV replication, it is valuable to develop drugs that can activate the functions of these anti-CSFV proteins. Theoretically, these drug candidates can also exert antiviral effects. Additionally, these antiviral proteins can be used to prepare transgenic pigs. Pigs that over-express antiviral genes can theoretically resist or reduce CSFV infection. IFN-inducible transmembrane proteins; IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3 colocalization with Lamp1, IFITM2 with Rab5 and Rab7, and IFITM3 with Rab7 appear in CSFV-infected cells. [43]

TRAF6
Interact with NS3 and inhibit CSFV replication via activation of NF-κB signaling pathway along with the increase in expression of IFN-β and IL-6. [47]

No. Host Protein Possible Mechanisms Associated with Anti-CSFV Effects of the Host Protein
Ref.

MAVS
The adaptor of the RIG-I-like receptor; induce antiviral cytokines and apoptosis to inhibit CSFV replication. [51] 13. pRNF114 RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligase; interact with the CSFV NS4B and mediate the K27-linked polyubiquitination and degradation of NS4B through a proteasome-dependent pathway. [52]

PSMB10
Interact with CSFV NS3 and mediate the degradation of NS3 through the ubiquitin-proteasome system; restore the function of MHC class I antigen presentation and inhibit CSFV proliferation. [53] 15. uS10 Interact with CSFV N pro and inhibit CSFV replication by modulating TLR3 expression. [54] 16. SERINC5 Inhibit CSFV replication via activation of MDA5-mediated type I IFN signaling pathway. [55] 17. LDHB Interact with CSFV NS3 and decrease CSFV replication possibly related to the regulation of mitophagy. [56] 18. eEF1A Interact with the CSFV NS5A; bind to the CSFV IRES; reduce the translation efficiency of CSFV IRES. [57] * Evidence regarding to host proteins affecting CSFV replication was supported from animal studies.

Host Proteins Whose Function Defect Exert Anti-CSFV Effects
Different host proteins might play the opposite role in the process of viral infection. In addition to the host proteins with antiviral effects mentioned above, there is another kind of host protein, which is utilized or hijacked by the virus and might promote virus replication. Previous studies have revealed that some host proteins played an important role in the process of CSFV infection or replication and are required for the life cycle of CSFV (Table 2). They have the potential to be anti-CSFV targets, due to that the function defect of this kind of host protein could inhibit CSFV replication. These host proteins could be divided into the following categories according to their possible mechanism involved in CSFV replication. (1) Many members of the small Rab GTPase family, such as Rab1A [58], Rab1b [59], Rab2 [60], Rab5 [61,62], Rab7, Rab11 [62], Rab18 [63], and Rab25 [64], play a critical role in CSFV replication. For example, Rab18 interacts with CSFV NS5A and mediates viral RNA replication and virion assembly [63]. (2) Some proteins could promote CSFV replication possibly through regulating the level of interferons (IFNs), such as PKR [65], PCBP1 [66], and MERTK [67]. (3) Some host proteins can help CSFV enter cells. For example, Tsg101 participates in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of CSFV [68]; LamR is a cellular attachment receptor for CSFV [69]; Anx2 is a cellular membrane protein likely associated with CSFV entry [70]; Integrin β3 is membrane-bound signal mediator related to the CSFV infection [71]. Some members of the small Rab GTPase family are also involved in virus entry; Rab5, Rab7, and Rab11 are needed for caveola-dependent endocytosis of CSFV in porcine alveolar macrophages [62]. (4) Some host proteins affect both CSFV replication and virulence through interacting with viral proteins, such as CCDC115 [72], SERTAD1 [73], DCTN6 [74], and IQGAP1 [75], which have been proved by both in vivo and in vitro studies. (5) Some host proteins or enzymes are beneficial for viral RNA replication, translation, and assembly, such as RHA [76] and eIF3E [77]. (6) Some proteins related to the function of Golgi and/or endoplasmic reticulum (ER), such as GBF1 [60], OS9 [78], and GRP78 [79], are important for CSFV replication. (7) Proteins related to MAPK signaling pathways, such as TRAF5 [80] and MEK2 [81,82], could promote CSFV replication. (8) Some proteins involved in autophagy or apoptosis, such as BECN1, LC3 [83], NDP52 [84], and FHC [85], also could regulate CSFV replication. (9) Other proteins were also reported to be involved in the CSFV replication, such as FKBP8 [86], Jiv90 [87], HSP70 [88], HO-1 [89], and AIF1 [90].
Since these proteins are potential anti-CSFV targets, scientists can consider developing some molecules that inhibit the functions of these proteins. Theoretically, these drug candidates can inhibit CSFV replication and have potential value in CSF treatment. Importantly, while verifying the antiviral effects of these drug candidates, it is necessary to test whether these drug candidates affect cell viability and/or have an adverse effect on pigs. Since the host proteins, required for CSFV infection or replication, might also play an important role in the cell life. While destroying the functions of these proteins exerts antiviral effects, the normal functions of cells or the body might also be disrupted.
Additionally, according to possible mechanism by which host proteins affect CSFV replication (Tables 1 and 2), we found that most of host proteins reported in the literature regulated the CSFV replication by interacting with CSFV viral proteins, such as interaction of Mx1 and CSFV NS5B [38], interaction of PCBP1 and CSFV N pro [66], and interaction of Anx2 and CSFV E2 [70], which meant that the interaction between host protein and viral protein played an important role in CSFV replication. High-throughput screening methods, such as yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay, have been utilized to screen the host proteins potentially interacting with CSFV viral proteins [47,48,54,66,[91][92][93]. However, only a small number of host proteins have been further confirmed to interact with CSFV viral proteins and affect CSFV replication. Thus, it is necessary to use co-immunoprecipitation, glutathione S-transferase pulldown, laser confocal microscopy or other methods to further verify the potential interaction obtained by high-throughput screening and then to evaluate the impact of interactions on CSFV replication. We believe that studies on the interaction between host protein and CSFV viral protein will be conducive to the discovery of novel antiviral proteins or antiviral targets. Table 2. Host proteins whose function defect can exert anti-CSFV effects.

No. Host Protein Possible Mechanism by Which Host Proteins Influence CSFV Replication
Ref.

Drug Candidates with Anti-CSFV Effects
Many efforts have been made for developing anti-CSFV drugs. CSFV life cycle mainly includes virus attachment, receptor binding and virus entry, virus uncoating, viral RNA replication, translation and processing of viral proteins, virion morphogenesis, and virus release [95]. It was reported that some molecules could target the CSFV life cycle, thereby exerting antiviral effects (Table 3). (1) Targeting the viral polymerase is an effective strategy against viruses. CSFV NS5B is an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which is a key enzyme initiating viral RNA replication. It was reported that viral polymerase inhibitors, such as BPIP [96][97][98], VP32947 [99], and BBP/CSFA-0 and its analogues [100], could inhibit CSFV replication in vivo and/or in vitro. Among them, the anti-CSFV effects of BPIP have been deeply studied; this drug could inhibit CSFV replication in vitro by targeting the viral polymerase, reduce CSFV infection in pigs and also reduce CSFV transmission to untreated pigs [96][97][98]. (2) Some recombinant proteins with ribonuclease (RNase) activity could suppress viral replication through degrading viral RNA. The recombinant antibody with RNA-hydrolyzing activity (3D8 scFv) [101] and Staphylococcus aureus nuclease fused with CSFV capsid protein (Cap-SNase) [102] could suppress CSFV propagation possibly by targeting viral RNA. (3) CSFV glycoproteins (E rns , E1, and E2) are located on the external part of viral particles. These glycoproteins form heterodimeric and/or homodimeric complexes, which are important for the stability of viral glycoproteins and the ability of viral infection. Some molecules targeting the glycosylation process, such as GP6 [103], glycosylation inhibitors (tunicamycin, IW3, and IW7) [104,105], and analogs of glycosyltransferase substrates [106,107], could inhibit the formation of glycoprotein complexes and virus yield.
Moreover, when studying the mechanism of CSFV replication, scientists found that many intracellular signaling pathways or biological processes were involved in the process of CSFV replication and many molecules had anti-CSFV activity by targeting these intracellular signaling pathways or biological processes (Table 3). (1) Both IFNs and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) are important for the host to resist viral infection. IFNα/γ [34,108,109] and recombinant protein encoded by ISGs, such as porcine Mx1 fused to HIV Tat protein transduction domain (PTD-poMx1) [40,110], have anti-CSFV effects. The effect of IFN-α treatment on CSFV infection in swine was reported for the first time by Fernandez-Sainz et al. [109]. They used the replication defective recombinant human adenovirus type 5 expressing porcine IFN-α (Ad5-pIFNα) to pretreat swine experimentally infected with highly virulent CSFV. Although the pretreatment with Ad5-pIFNα could not prevent lethal disease, it indeed delayed the appearance of CSF-related clinical signs and viral replication [109], which suggested that IFN-α was a potential anti-CSFV agent. Additionally, Zhang et al. [110] reported that treatment with PTD-poMx1 alleviated CSF-related symptoms and viral load in CSFV-infected pigs, but could not completely block CSFV replication, which meant that PTD-poMx1 could provide partial protection against CSFV challenge. (2) Intracellular cholesterol and its transport play an important role in CSFV infection and replication [111,112]. Drug reducing cellular cholesterol levels (MβCD and 25-hydroxycholesterol) [111], or inhibiting cholesterol transport (U18666A and imipramine) [112], could inhibit CSFV replication. (3) Previous studies have demonstrated CSFV infection could trigger a functional autophagy pathway, which was important for CSFV replication and release in host cells [83,113]. The induction of autophagy with rapamycin increases virus yield, while inhibiting the autophagy with 3-MA decreases virus yield [83]. (4) Free fatty acids are required for CSFV replication; inhibitors of fatty acid biosynthesis (C75 and TOFA) or inhibitors of fatty acid beta-oxidation (etomoxir and TMZ) [114] affect virus production. (5) CSFV could utilize intracellular membrane organelles for its replication. Drug regulating the function of Golgi and/or ER, such as inhibitors of vesicular transport between Golgi and ER (BFA, CI-976, and GCA) [59,60], ER stress inhibitors (TUDCA and 4-PBA) [115], and IRE1 endonuclease inhibitor (4µ8c) [116], significantly inhibit CSFV replication. (6) TLRs signaling pathways are involved in CSFV replication; TLR-specific ligands, such as LPS [117,118] and R837 [118], exert inhibitory effects on CSFV replication. (7) Drugs targeting the MAPK signaling pathway, such as SB203580 (an inhibitor of p38 MAPK activation) [80] and U0126 (specific inhibitor for MEK1/2/ERK1/2) [82], could suppress CSFV replication. (8) The proteasome is involved in the interplay between many viruses and hosts. MG132 [119], a proteasome inhibitor, could attenuate the CSFV replication. (9) Other molecules also have anti-CSFV effects, such as Prostaglandin A1 [120,121], the phage-displayed E2-binding peptides [122], ceramide (C6) (activator of the protein phosphatase 1 pathway) [123], and quercetin (inhibitor of HSP70 function) [88]. More and more anti-CSFV drug candidates will be discovered with the increase of antiviral research.

No. Drug Candidates Possible Mechanism Related to the Antiviral Effect of Drug Candidates
Ref.

3D8 scFv
A recombinant antibody with RNA-hydrolyzing and cell-penetrating activities; suppress CSFV replication possibly by targeting viral RNA genomes or transcripts. [101]

RNA Interference (RNAi) Targeting Viral Genes
RNA interference (RNAi) is an intracellular mechanism for post-transcriptional gene silence induced by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of about 21-23 nt, which are homologous to the mRNA of target genes [124]. RNAi has been successfully applied to inhibit the replication of many viruses. The application of RNAi strategy for controlling CSF is also promising. Studies have shown that RNAi targeting CSFV viral genes, such as N pro , p7, NS3, NS4A, NS5A, NS5B, and C [125][126][127][128][129][130], had anti-CSFV effects. Li et al. [127] revealed that RNAi targeting single or multiple viral genes could efficiently inhibit CSFV replication and the anti-CSFV effect was markedly stronger when interfering with multiple viral genes. Moreover, both short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) and siRNAs technology are effective RNAi strategies for targeting CSFV viral genes. Importantly, RNAi strategy targeting CSFV viral genes is also valuable for research of transgenic pigs resistant to CSFV [131,132]. The transgenic pigs expressing anti-CSFV shRNAs could effectively limit the CSFV replication and reduce CSFV-associated clinical signs [131].

Concluding Remarks and Prospects
CSF is an ancient zoonotic disease, which has caused substantial economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. The control of this disease is still a major problem for the pig industry. Currently, it is difficult to completely eradicate CSF in CSF-endemic and reemerging areas through biosecurity and vaccination strategies. Therefore, it is meaningful to develop anti-CSFV drugs or other strategies. In this review, we summarized the anti-CSFV strategies into several aspects including host proteins with anti-CSFV effects, host proteins whose function defect exert anti-CSFV effects, drug candidates with anti-CSFV effects, and RNAi targeting CSFV viral genes. Many host proteins and chemical molecules exert anti-CSFV effects by targeting the process of virus replication including viral attachment and entry, viral genome replication, translation and post-translational modification of viral proteins, and the assembly of the viral particle ( Figure 2). Furthermore, many intracellular signaling pathways or biological processes have been shown to be related to CSFV infection and replication, such as type I IFN signaling pathway, NF-κB signaling pathway, RIG-I-like signaling pathway, ubiquitin-proteasome system, TLRs signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathways, autophagy, apoptosis, and metabolism and transport of lipids. These pathways or biological processes can be utilized for the development of anti-CSFV targets or drugs ( Figure 2). Although the commercial and specific anti-CSFV drug is still not available, the increasing antiviral research will help the discovery of anti-CSFV drugs. Additionally, due to that members of the Flaviviridae have similar genomic structures and replication strategies [133], studies on anti-CSFV strategies could be used as a reference for other viruses in the Flaviviridae family, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV), dengue virus, and Zika virus. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that some molecules, such as analogs of glycosyltransferase substrates [106,107], could inhibit the replication of both CSFV and HCV.
After summarizing and analyzing the results of previous anti-CSFV research, we make some suggestions, which might benefit further anti-CSFV research. (1) Animal experiments are needed for the evaluation of the effect of anti-CSFV strategies. We found that cells were selected as the main object for the anti-CSFV research in previous reports, and animal experiments were rarely involved. Thus, we recommend that researchers could use animals to evaluate the effects of antiviral strategies after antiviral strategies have achieved good antiviral effects at the cellular level. (2) It is necessary to evaluate the safety of antiviral strategies to animals, because some antiviral strategies may be toxic to animals. For example, Dai et al. [134] reported that an early lethality due to anti-CSFV shRNA was observed in shRNA-transgenic pigs; they revealed that shRNA caused adverse effects and shRNAinduced disruption of the endogenous miRNA pathway might lead to the early lethality of shRNA-transgenic pigs. (3) The issue of drug resistance needs attention. Previous studies have demonstrated that drug-resistant CSFV strains could be induced in vitro through the serial passage of the virus in increasing drug-concentration [96,100], which meant that clinical drug-resistant CSFV strains might also emerge if the drug was used in the clinic. (4) MiRNAs could be used to develop new potential antiviral strategies. Previous studies have shown that miRNAs play an important role during viral infection [135,136]. MiRNAs can inhibit or promote the replication of viruses, such as dengue virus [135] and HCV [136], which shows that miRNA mimics and miRNA inhibitors are potential antiviral drug candidates. MiRNAs could also regulate CSFV replication. For example, miR-140 inhibits CSFV replication by targeting Rab25 [64]. However, there are still few studies on the relationship between miRNA and CSFV replication. Further research is needed for discovering miRNAs that affect CSFV replication. (5) Previous studies have revealed that in vitro screening of chemical libraries facilitated the acquisition of potential inhibitors of viral replication, such as SARS-CoV-2 [137]. Thus, we think commercial antiviral compound libraries can be used to screen anti-CSFV drugs, which has not yet been reported. (6) Studies on the pathogenic mechanism of CSF will facilitate the discovery of antiviral targets or drugs. Although many studies related to the mechanism of CSFV replication have been reported, the pathogenesis of CSF is still poorly understood. For effective prevention and control of CSF, it is necessary to conduct in-depth and systematic research on the pathogenesis of CSF.
CSF is an ancient zoonotic disease, which has caused substantial economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. The control of this disease is still a major problem for the pig industry. Currently, it is difficult to completely eradicate CSF in CSF-endemic and reemerging areas through biosecurity and vaccination strategies. Therefore, it is meaningful to develop anti-CSFV drugs or other strategies. In this review, we summarized the anti-CSFV strategies into several aspects including host proteins with anti-CSFV effects, host proteins whose function defect exert anti-CSFV effects, drug candidates with anti-CSFV effects, and RNAi targeting CSFV viral genes. Many host proteins and chemical molecules exert anti-CSFV effects by targeting the process of virus replication including viral attachment and entry, viral genome replication, translation and post-translational modification of viral proteins, and the assembly of the viral particle ( Figure 2). Furthermore, many intracellular signaling pathways or biological processes have been shown to be related to CSFV infection and replication, such as type I IFN signaling pathway, NF-κB signaling pathway, RIG-I-like signaling pathway, ubiquitin-proteasome system, TLRs signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathways, autophagy, apoptosis, and metabolism and transport of lipids. These pathways or biological processes can be utilized for the development of anti-CSFV targets or drugs (Figure 2). Although the commercial and specific anti-CSFV drug is still not available, the increasing antiviral research will help the discovery of anti-CSFV drugs. Additionally, due to that members of the Flaviviridae have similar genomic structures and replication strategies [133], studies on anti-CSFV strategies could be used as a reference for other viruses in the Flaviviridae family, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV), dengue virus, and Zika virus. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that some molecules, such as analogs of glycosyltransferase substrates [106,107], could inhibit the replication of both CSFV and HCV.  Figure 2 referred to the previous literature reported by Li et al. [95] with some modifications. Pathway Builder Tool 2.0 was used to draw the schematic diagram of the CSFV life cycle. Anti-CSFV molecules could target the CSFV life cycle including virus attachment, receptor binding and virus entry, virus uncoating, viral RNA replication, translation and processing of viral proteins, virion morphogenesis, and virus release. Anti-CSFV molecules could also target the intracellular signaling pathways or biological processes related to CSFV infection and replication, such as type