Next Article in Journal
Mangrove Microbiomes as Drivers of Ecosystem Recovery and Restoration Success
Previous Article in Journal
Type VI Secretion Systems in Salmonella Encode New Effectors with Putative Antibacterial and Anti-Eukaryotic Activities
 
 
Correction published on 30 July 2026, see Microorganisms 2026, 14(8), 1672.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction and Evaluation of High-Efficiency Tannase-Producing Strains

1
Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
2
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(6), 1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061233
Submission received: 29 April 2026 / Revised: 22 May 2026 / Accepted: 25 May 2026 / Published: 30 May 2026 / Corrected: 30 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)

Abstract

The low production efficiency of tannase and the insufficient utilization of high-tannin feed resources form the research background and research significance of this study. In this experiment, the tannase sequence TanLpl from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC14917T (obtained from a microbial culture collection) was selected. These sequences were respectively integrated into the expression systems of Bacillus subtilis 168 (BS168) and Bacillus subtilis WB600 (WB600) through plasmids TanLpl-p43NMK and TanLpl-pHT43. This successfully constructed three tannase-producing strains: TanLpl-p43NMK-Bacillus subtilis 168 (BS168(p43NMK)), TanLpl-pHT43-Bacillus subtilis 168 (BS168(pHT43)), and TanLpl-pHT43-Bacillus subtilis WB600 (WB600(pHT43)). An evaluation of the recombinant strains’ growth characteristics, expression stability, and enzymatic properties revealed that all three strains reached the stationary phase after 18 h of growth, with no significant differences in growth rate compared to the parental strains. At the 10th generation of subculture, the plasmid loss rate of BS168(p43NMK) was significantly higher than that of BS168(pHT43) or WB600(pHT43) (p < 0.05). The optimal temperature for tannase activity in all three recombinant strains was 30 °C, with an optimal pH value of 5.0. Under these conditions, the tannase activities were 68.81 U/mL, 397.36 U/mL, and 461.12 U/mL, respectively. The recombinant strain WB600(pHT43) exhibited superior expression stability and enzyme production capability compared to the other two strains. The research on the heterologous expression of tannase and its application in feed utilization has important theoretical and practical significance: it enriches the technical system for the heterologous expression of functional enzymes in Bacillus subtilis, provides new ideas for the efficient production of industrial enzymes, and promotes the development of bio-manufacturing technology.

1. Introduction

Tannins are naturally occurring plant compounds that are extensively present in feeding patterns and possess varying biological activities. Excess tannins can inhibit nutrient digestion and absorption, damage the intestinal mucosal barrier, suppress immune function, slow growth rate and even reduce the reproductive performance of animals. Therefore, various approaches have been used to lower and/or remove tannins in high-tannin-containing feeds, especially in areas where feed sources are limited and animals rely on feed with high tannin content [1]. The application of tannase is one of them [2].
Tannase (tannin acylhydrolase) is an enzyme produced by tannase-producing microorganisms, primarily fungi and bacteria. Fungal-derived tannases generally exhibit higher enzymatic activity compared to their bacterial counterparts [3,4]. However, the production efficiency of native tannase-producing fungi and bacteria is insufficient to support the industrial application of this enzyme. Therefore, there is a need to develop an efficient heterologous expression of tannase to enhance enzyme production such that could facilitate the utilization of high-tannin-containing feed [5]. Jingya Wu et al. [6] cloned a putative gene encoding the subtype B tannase (Gt-Tan) from Galactobacillus timonensis and expressed heterologously in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells. The Gt-Tan was purified using metal-affinity chromatography and exhibited a monomeric structure with a molecular weight of 55 kDa. Gt-Tan showed optimal activity at a temperature of 50°C and a pH value of 6.0. Nalapat Leangnim et al. [7] isolated nine tannase-producing yeasts; all tannases were produced within the same production yield (11 mU/mL). Rodríguez et al. [8] isolated Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CECT 784T (also known as ATCC14917T), whose cell-free extract demonstrated maximum tannase activity at pH 5.0 and 30 °C. The tannase gene sequence TanLpl from L. plantarum ATCC14917T contains an open reading frame of 1410 bp, encoding a 469-amino acid protein. Purified tannase is a monomeric polypeptide with a molecular weight of approximately 50 kDa. The enzymatic activity of TanLpl-encoded tannase surpasses that of other bacterial tannases, displaying a specific activity of 84.34 U/mg at pH 5.0 and 30 °C after chromatographic purification, with a maximum specific activity of 131 U/mg (equivalent to 214 U/mL) at pH 5.0 and 30 °C. Pulido et al. [9] demonstrated that L. plantarum harboring TanLpl can release proteins and metal ions chelated by tannins in fermentation substrates, utilizing these liberated nutrients. This confers ecological advantages over non-tannase-producing bacteria and tannase-producing fungi during the early stages of feed fermentation. Consequently, the TanLpl gene from L. plantarum ATCC14917T is ideally suited for caragana-fermented feed production [10].
Bacillus subtilis has been an exceptional expression host due to its beneficial properties and utility in heterologous protein production [11]. Some advantages of using B. subtilis as an expression host include short growth cycle, non-pathogenicity [12], the absence of exotoxin and endotoxin production, broad cultivation adaptability, robust extracellular protein secretion capacity, etc. [13]. These attributes make B. subtilis an optimal host for industrial-scale heterologous protein expression. Shuhei Ueda et al. employed Bacillus subtilis Rik1285 as the expression host to heterologously express the tannase genes tanLpl, tanLpa, and tanLpe derived from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, L. paraplantarum, and L. pentosus, respectively. Their study was restricted to the characterization of enzymatic properties, without further optimization for high-level enzyme activity expression [14].
The tannase gene sequence TanLpl from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC14917T (GenBank accession number: AB379685) was added into the expression systems of Bacillus subtilis 168 and Bacillus subtilis WB600. This was achieved using an integrated plasmid method, aiming to obtain recombinant strains capable of high-efficiency tannase production. This study provides a foundation for utilizing caragana as feed material.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The strains, plasmids, markers, kits and their sources used in this experiment are listed in Table 1.
The culture media, electroporation buffer and their compositions are listed in Table 2.

2.2. Primer Design and Synthesis

Primers used in this study (Table 3) were designed based on the TanAn and TanLpl (GenBank accession no. AB379685) gene sequences in GenBank. The primers and TanLpl gene sequence were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd.

2.3. Recombinant Plasmid Construction

2.3.1. Construction of Plasmid TanLpl-p43NMK

The TanLpl sequence was amplified in PCR with TanLpl-F and TanLpl-R primers using Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC14917T genomic DNA, prepared as above, as template. The amplified product was then electrophoresed on agarose gel, following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the target band was extracted and purified twice, following the manufacturer’s protocol. This was followed by fusing TanLpl-p43-F/TanLpl-p43-R. PCR was performed using the TanLpl amplicon as the template, with primers containing the P43 promoter, and the target band was recovered and purified for downstream use. The p43NMK vector backbone was individually amplified from the p43NMK plasmid using primers p43NMK-HindIIIF and p43-R, which was followed by gel electrophoresis and the purification of the target band.
The PCR reactions were performed using a Bio-Rad T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction components and dosages are shown in Table 4. The reaction parameters were determined based on previous studies. The amplification procedures were set as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 68 °C for 30 s. A final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 5 min, and the reaction mixtures were maintained at 4 °C until subsequent treatments.
The purified TanLpl amplicon and the p43NMK vector backbone PCR products were ligated using a recombinant cloning kit of Easy Geno Assembly Mix (Table 1), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The reaction mixtures are described in Table 5.
The recombinant plasmids were then transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells. The preparation of competent cells and transformation operations for Bacillus subtilis were conducted following standard protocols [15]. The transformed strains were subsequently spread onto LB agar plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Table 2). The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h (all constant-temperature incubations described in this manuscript were carried out using a Yiheng LRH-250 thermostatic incubator (Shanghai Yiheng Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China)) to screen positive clones grown on ampicillin-supplemented LB agar (Table 2) plates.
The positive monoclones were taken from the plates [15], and the plasmid extraction was performed using a plasmid extraction kit (Table 1), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR screening was conducted using 0.5 μL of extracted plasmid as template, with reaction components as listed in Table 6 and TanLpl-F and TanLpl-R primers under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 32 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), annealing (55 °C, 30 s), and extension (72 °C, 30 s); and then a further extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification products were stored at 4 °C, then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The target band was excised from the gel and purified using an agarose gel DNA recovery kit (Table 1), with the process conducted according to the standard protocol.
The recombinant plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing, and only those with the correct sequence were used for the construction of recombinant strains [16,17].

2.3.2. Construction of Plasmid TanLpl-pHT43

The TanLpl sequence was amplified in PCR with TanLpl-F and TanLpl-R primers using Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC14917T genomic DNA, prepared as above, as template. The amplified product was then electrophoresed on agarose gel, following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the target band was extracted and purified twice, following the manufacturer’s protocol. This was followed by fusing TanLpl-p43-F/TanLpl-p43-R. PCR was performed using the TanLpl amplicon as the template, with primers containing the P43 promoter, and the target band was recovered and purified for downstream use. The pHT43 vector backbone was individually amplified from the pHT43 plasmid using primers pHT43-HindIIIF and p43-R, followed by gel electrophoresis and the purification of the target band.
The purified TanLpl amplicon and the pHT43 vector backbone PCR products were ligated using a recombinant cloning kit of Easy Geno Assembly Mix (Table 1), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The reaction mixtures are described in Table 7. The recombinant plasmid was then subjected to competent cell transformation into E. coli DH5α competent cells. The preparation of competent cells and the transformation of B. subtilis were performed according to standard procedures [15]. These were subsequently transferred onto plates of LB agar supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Table 2). The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h to screen positive clones grown on ampicillin-supplemented LB agar (Table 2) plates.
The positive monoclones were taken from the plates [15], and the plasmid extraction was performed using a plasmid extraction kit (Table 1), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR screening was conducted using 0.5 μL of extracted plasmid as template, with reaction components listed in Table 5 and TanLpl-F and TanLpl-R primers under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 32 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), annealing (55 °C, 30 s), and extension (72 °C, 30 s); and then a further extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification products were stored at 4 °C, then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The target band was excised from the gel and purified using an agarose gel DNA recovery kit (Table 1), with the process conducted according to the standard protocol.
The recombinant plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing, and only those with the correct sequence were used for the construction of recombinant strains [16,17].

2.4. Recombinant Strain Construction

2.4.1. Preparation of Bacillus subtilis Competent Cells

Streak Bacillus subtilis 168(BS 168) and Bacillus subtilis WB600(BS WB600) onto LB agar plates (Table 2), and incubate invertedly at 37 °C for 24 h. Take single colonies from the streaked plates [17] and inoculate each into LB liquid medium (Table 2). Shake-culture at 150 rpm/min and 37 °C for 16 h. Transfer the cultures into fresh growth medium (Table 2) at a 1:12 (v/v) inoculum ratio. The cultures were shake-cultured at 150 rpm and 37 °C until the OD600 = 0.9 (all incubations at constant temperature with shaking described in this manuscript were carried out Using a DHZ-DA full-temperature shaking incubator (Taicang Haocheng Experimental Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Taicang, Suzhou, China)). Chill the culture on ice for 10 min. Then, centrifuge the culture at 5000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C to harvest the cell pellet. Wash the cell pellet three times with ice-cold electroporation buffer (Table 2, EP buffer) to remove residual medium. Resuspend the cell pellet with 1.2 mL electroporation buffer to prepare competent cells. Aliquot the competent cells and store at −80 °C in a DW-86L728BPST ultra-low temperature freezer (Haier Biomedical Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China).

2.4.2. Electroporation of Plasmid TanLpl-p43NMK

Add 150 μL of BS168 competent cells (Section 2.4.1) as the expression host into a pre-chilled electroporation cuvette, followed by the addition of 5 μL of the previously prepared linearized plasmid TanLpl-p43NMK (Section 2.3.1). After mixing thoroughly, incubate the mixture on ice for 5 min. Apply an electrical pulse at 2.0 kV for 4.2 ms. Immediately after electroporation, add 1 mL of electroporation recovery medium (Table 2) and incubate with shaking at 37 °C and 100 r/min for 3 h. Plate 100 μL of the culture onto LB agar plates containing 20 μg/mL kanamycin (Table 2). The plates were incubated invertedly at 37 °C for 24 h. Positive colonies of Bacillus subtilis 168 harboring the recombinant plasmid that could grow on kanamycin-supplemented LB agar plates were screened and designated as BS168 (TanLpl-p43NMK). Extract genomic DNA from positive colonies using a DNA extraction kit (Table 2). The p43NMK sequence was amplified in p43NMK-F and p43NMK-R primers using BS168 (TanAn-p43NMK) genomic DNA, prepared as above, as template. PCR-verified clones containing the correctly integrated genes were used for inoculation [17].

2.4.3. Electroporation of Plasmid TanLpl-pHT43

Separately add 150 μL of BS 168 and BS WB600 competent cells (Section 2.4.1) as the expression hosts into a pre-chilled electroporation cuvette, followed by the addition of 5 μL of the previously prepared linearized plasmid TanLpl-pHT43 (Section 2.3.2). After mixing thoroughly, incubate the mixture on ice for 5 min. Apply an electrical pulse at 2.0 kV for 4.2 ms. Immediately after electroporation, add 1 mL of electroporation recovery medium (Table 2) and incubate with shaking at 37 °C and 100 r/min for 3 h. Plate 100 μL of the culture onto LB agar plates containing 15 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Table 2). The plates were incubated invertedly at 37 °C for 24 h. Separately, positive colonies of Bacillus subtilis 168 and Bacillus subtilis WB600 harboring the recombinant plasmid that could grow on chloramphenicol-supplemented LB agar plates were screened and designated as BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43). Extract genomic DNA from positive colonies using a DNA extraction kit (Table 2). The pHT43 sequence was amplified in pHT43-F and pHT43-R primers using BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) genomic DNA, prepared as above, as template. PCR-verified clones containing the correctly integrated genes were used for inoculation [17].

2.5. Expression Verification Protocol for Recombinant Strains

Inoculate strains BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK) in LB liquid medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL kanamycin (Table 2) at 37°C with shaking (120 rpm) for 18 h. The samples were centrifuged at 4 °C and 5000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected as the crude tannase enzyme. SDS-PAGE analysis was performed.
Separately, incubate strains BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) in LB liquid medium supplemented with 15 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Table 2) at 37°C with shaking (120 rpm) for 18 h. After the cultivation of BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43), IPTG (Table 2) was added to a final concentration of 1 mM, followed by induction for 6 h. The samples were centrifuged at 4 °C and 5000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected as the crude tannase enzyme. SDS-PAGE analysis was performed.
Combine each crude tannase enzyme with 4 × SDS loading buffer (Table 1), boil at 100 °C for 10 min, and immediately chill on ice for 5 min. Centrifuge the samples at 4 °C, 12,000 rpm/min for 10 min to remove debris. The tannase protein expression was assessed by 12% SDS-PAGE gels (Table 1), followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (Table 1) for visualization [17].

2.6. Determination of Growth Characteristics of Recombinant Strains

Inoculate strain BS168(p43NMK) in LB liquid medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL kanamycin (Table 2). Separately inoculate strains BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) in LB liquid medium supplemented with 15 μg/mL chloramphenicol. Incubate all cultures at 37 °C with shaking at 150 rpm/min. Cultures were sampled every 2 h to measure the OD600 value, and then the growth curves were plotted.

2.7. Determination of Expression Stability in Recombinant Strains

Recombinant strains were inoculated into LB liquid medium (Table 2) at 37 °C with shaking at 150 rpm/min for 24 h, followed by 10 consecutive serial passages. During each passage, aliquots were collected and serially diluted using a gradient dilution method [18]. The diluted samples were then plated onto LB agar plates (Table 2) and antibiotic-supplemented LB agar plates. Strains carrying the p43NMK plasmid were plated on LB agar containing kanamycin (Table 2). Strains carrying the pHT43 plasmid were plated on LB agar containing chloramphenicol (Table 2). Each dilution gradient was plated in triplicate. After 24 h of inverted incubation at 37 °C, colonies were counted to calculate the plasmid loss rate using the following formula:
Plasmid loss rate (%) = [(Colonies on antibiotic-free plates − Colonies on antibiotic plates)/Colonies on antibiotic-free plates] × 100%.

2.8. Enzymatic Characterization of Tannase from Recombinant Strains

2.8.1. Determination of Optimum Temperature for Enzymatic Reaction

Inoculate strain BS168(p43NMK) in LB liquid medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL kanamycin (Table 2) and incubate at 37 °C with shaking at 100 rpm for 24 h for later use. Separately inoculate strains BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) in LB liquid medium containing 15 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Table 2), followed by incubation under identical shaking conditions (37 °C, 100 rpm) for 18 h. Induce protein expression by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM for 6 h.
Harvest cultures via centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min and collect supernatants. Incubate supernatants at 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, 40 °C, 45 °C, 50 °C, and 55 °C, maintaining each temperature for 2 h. Measure tannase activity using the Tannase Assay Kit (Micro method; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology (Beijing, China) Co., Ltd.), strictly following the manufacturer’s protocol. Calculate relative enzyme activity ratios using the highest activity value as 100% baseline. The temperature corresponding to the maximum activity ratio is determined as the optimum temperature for enzymatic reactions.

2.8.2. Determination of Optimum pH for Enzymatic Reactions

Inoculate strain BS168(p43NMK) in LB liquid medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL kanamycin and incubate at 37 °C with shaking at 100 rpm for 24 h. Separately inoculate strains BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) in LB liquid medium containing 15 μg/mL chloramphenicol, followed by incubation under identical shaking conditions (37 °C, 100 rpm) for 18 h. Induce protein expression by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM for 6 h. Harvest cultures via centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min and collect supernatants. Adjust the pH of supernatants to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, maintaining each pH condition for 2 h. Measure tannase activity using the Tannase Assay Kit (Micro method; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), strictly following the manufacturer’s protocol. This kit uses propyl gallate (PG) as the standard substance. One unit of tannase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that degrades 1 nmol of PG per minute in the reaction system per 104 bacterial cells. Calculate relative enzyme activity ratios using the highest activity value as 100% baseline. The pH value corresponding to the maximum activity ratio is identified as the optimum pH for enzymatic reactions [19].

2.9. Data Analysis

Data organization was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Data analysis was carried out via SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), Origin 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) and R 4.2.1 (R Core Team). Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were arranged in this experiment. A one-way analysis of variance was used for data analysis, and different superscript letters represented significant differences (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Construction of Recombinant Plasmids

The PCR verification showed bright, smearing-free characteristic bands, with molecular weights of approximately 1590 bp (Figure 1) for the constructed recombinant plasmids. This demonstrated successful constructions of the recombinant plasmids that were designated as TanLpl-p43NMK and TanLpl-p43NMK.

3.2. Construction of Recombinant Strains

PCA amplification yielded bright, smearing-free characteristic bands of BS168 with molecular weights of approximately 1590 bp (Figure 2) for TanLpl-p43NMK and BS168 and WB600 (molecular weight; Figure 2) for TanLpl-pHT43. These results showed a successful transformation of plasmid TanLpl-p43NMK into BS168, designated as BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK). Additionally, the transformations of TanLpl-pHT43 into BS168 and WB600 were designated as BS168(TanLpl-pHT43) and WB600(TanLpl-pHT43).

3.3. Expression Profiling of Recombinant Strains

BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK), BS168(pHT43), and WB600(pHT43) all exhibited distinct bands at the expected size of approximately 50 kDa (Figure 3). These results indicate the successful expression of the recombinant plasmid TanLpl-p43NMK in BS168 and the successful expression of the recombinant plasmid TanLpl-pHT43 in both BS168 and WB600. Notably, BS168(p43NMK) required no induction, whereas BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) transformants necessitated induction with 1 mM IPTG for 6 h.

3.4. Growth Characteristics of Recombinant Strains

The five recombinant strains (BS168, WB600, BS168(p43NMK), BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43)) exhibited similar growth kinetics, entering the stationary phase after approximately 18 h (Figure 4), and had similar growth rates to that of the parental strain.

3.5. Expression Stability of Recombinant Strains

There was a significant difference in the plasmid loss rates among the three recombinant strains (p < 0.001; Table 8). The plasmid loss rates of WB600 (pHT43) in the 1st and 2nd generations was higher (p-value p < 0.001; Table 8) than those of BS168(pHT43) and BS168(p43NMK). The plasmid loss rates of the three recombinant strains increased as the passage number increased. At the 10th passage, the plasmid loss rates of BS168(pHT43) and WB600 (pHT43) were significantly lower (p-value) than that of BS168(p43NMK), with BS168(p43NMK) being approximately twice those of BS168(pHT43) and WB600 (pHT43). These results indicate that the recombinant strains BS168(pHT43) and WB600 (pHT43) can stably inherit the carried target gene.

3.6. Enzymatic Properties of Tannase from Recombinant Strains

The effect of temperature on tannase activity produced by the three recombinant strains showed similar curves, and the optimal enzymatic reaction temperature was uniformly 30 °C (Figure 5A). The tannase relative activity increased as the temperature increased from 20 °C to 30 °C, reaching a maximal value of 100% at temperature = 30 °C, and thereafter gradually decreased as the temperature increased to 55 °C.
The optimal pH for the enzymatic reaction of tannase produced by the three recombinant strains was 5.0 (Figure 5B). The tannase relative activity increased as the pH increased from 2 to 5, reaching a maximal value of 100% at pH = 5, and thereafter gradually decreased as the pH increased to 9.

3.7. Tannase Activity of Recombinant Strains Under Optimal Conditions

Under the optimal conditions (pH 5.0, 30 °C), the tannase production activities of BS168(p43NMK), BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43) were 68.81, 397.36 and 461.12 U/mL, respectively (Table 9).

4. Discussion

Tannase-producing microorganisms are widely distributed in nature, with fungi and bacteria being the primary natural sources [1,2]. Although fungi possess relatively strong tannase-producing capabilities, they are not conducive to the preservation of fermented feed and exhibit poor aerobic stability [20], which imposes certain limitations on their application in industrial production. On the other hand, the low enzyme yield of bacteria fails to meet the demands of fermented feed production [21]. Therefore, the efficient heterologous expression of tannase represents a viable and effective strategy to address this bottleneck.
The Bacillus subtilis expression system consists of Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) microorganisms and is classified as a food-safe strain [13]. B. subtilis is non-pathogenic, with a single-layer outer membrane that grows rapidly with low nutritional requirements and that can directly secrete many extracellular proteins [22]. It possesses a well-defined genetic background and complete genome information, with a wealth of plasmid expression systems, genome-editing tools, and gene expression regulatory modules available [23]. B. subtilis was the first Bacillus species found to exhibit natural competence [24]. The B. subtilis expression system has been used for the efficient secretory expression of many heterologous proteins, with B. subtilis 168 and its derivatives being the most commonly used strains [25].
However, the B. subtilis expression system can secrete large amounts of extracellular proteases in the stationary phase, which can degrade the target protein [22]. B. subtilis WB600 carries deletions of six extracellular protease genes (nprE, nprB, aprE, epr, mpr, bpr), and its extracellular proteolytic activity is less than 0.32% of that of wild-type B. subtilis [26]. Therefore, in this study, B. subtilis 168 and B. subtilis WB600 were used as hosts for the efficient heterologous expression of the tannase gene: TanLpl from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917ᵀ.
This study showed that TanLpl was successfully expressed with detectable extracellular enzyme activity. Under the optimal conditions (30 °C, pH 5.0), the tannase activity produced by B. subtilis WB600(pHT43) reached 461.12 U/mL, which was superior to that of B. subtilis 168(p43NMK) and B. subtilis 168(pHT43) because, compared with p43NMK, pHT43 possesses stronger IPTG-inducible Pgrac promoter and high-efficiency amyQ signal peptide, which can significantly enhance gene transcription and extracellular protein secretion. Meanwhile, pHT43 exhibits a higher plasmid copy number and better genetic stability. In addition, Bacillus subtilis WB600 is deficient in multiple extracellular proteases, which effectively avoids the degradation of secreted tannase and further improves the extracellular expression level of target proteins [27]. This activity was higher than the activity of the tannase gene Gt-Tan sequence recombinantly expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 [6], and also higher than that of the native tannase-producing strain A. niger N5-5 [28]. The optimal fermentation temperature commonly employed in fermented feed production is generally in the range of 30~35 °C [29], which is highly consistent with the optimal temperature of 30 °C for tannase activity determined in this study. Meanwhile, the pH of fermented feed usually decreases to approximately 4.5~5.5 during fermentation, which is also highly compatible with the optimal pH 5.0 of the recombinant tannase. These results suggest that the environmental conditions of conventional fermented feed can satisfy the requirements for both the growth of B. subtilis WB600 and the catalytic activity of TanLpl. Therefore, the recombinant strain constructed in this study exhibits good application potential in the production of tannin-rich fermented feed, as it can achieve efficient enzyme expression and exert its catalytic function synchronously with the feed fermentation process.
B. subtilis WB600 has also been successfully used for recombinant expressions of other proteins, for example, pullulanase gene, with enzyme yield being 5.5-fold higher than that in recombinant E. coli [30]; phosphorylase gene [31]; and keratinase gene, with the extracellular enzyme activity being 15.2-fold higher than that of the parental strain [32]. These improvements may be attributed to the deletion of extracellular proteases in B. subtilis WB600, allowing the stable expression and secretion of heterologous extracellular proteins. All together, these results demonstrate that B. subtilis WB600 is more suitable as an expression system for the expression of heterologous extracellular proteins [33,34].
pHT43 is an E. coliBacillus subtilis shuttle vector constructed by ligating the endogenous θ-replicating plasmid replicon of B. subtilis with an E. coli cloning vector, which has exhibited good stability in B. subtilis [35]. In this study, when B. subtilis 168 was used as the expression host, the tannase activity of the recombinant strain harboring pHT43 as the expression vector was 5.7-fold higher than that of the recombinant strain with p43NMK as the expression vector. These results suggest that pHT43 constructed in this study possesses superior expression efficiency and stronger secretion capacity for tannase compared with p43NMK, making it a more suitable shuttle vector for the heterologous expression and extracellular production of tannase in Bacillus subtilis. Although the strain has certain theoretical application prospects in fermented feed production, large-scale solid-state fermentation simulation experiments and actual production verification are still lacking. And follow-up simulated feed fermentation tests will be carried out to further confirm its practical application effect.
The results of the recombinant strain expression stability showed that, starting from the 3rd passage, the plasmid loss rate of B. subtilis 168(p43NMK) was higher than those of B. subtilis 168(pHT43) and B. subtilis WB600(pHT43), and reached 98.72% at the 10th passage, which was twice those of the other two recombinant strains. These findings indicate that plasmid pHT43 is superior to plasmid p43NMK in both expression stability and expression capacity.
In summary, the high-tannase-producing recombinant strain B. subtilis WB600(pHT43), constructed using pHT43 as the expression vector and B. subtilis WB600 as the expression host, exhibited superior enzyme production capacity and stability compared to the other two recombinant strains. The optimal conditions for the extracellular tannase secreted by the recombinant strain were similar to those of fermented feed production, indicating that this recombinant strain can be used as a microbial agent for Caragana korshinskii fermentation.

5. Conclusions

(1)
The TanLpl gene sequence from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917ᵀ was inserted into the Bacillus subtilis expression system, yielding three stable tannase-producing recombinant strains: B. subtilis 168(p43NMK), B. subtilis 168(pHT43), and B. subtilis WB600(pHT43).
(2)
Under optimal conditions (pH 5.0, 30 °C), the tannase activities of the three recombinant strains were 68.81, 397.36 and 461.12 U/mL, respectively. The recombinant strain B. subtilis WB600(pHT43) was superior to the other two strains in terms of expression stability and enzyme production capacity.

6. Future Prospects

(1)
In future studies, more kinds of metal ions and chemical additives will be tested to further explore the stability and catalytic adaptability of recombinant tannase.
(2)
Optimized fermentation conditions will be explored to improve the extracellular secretion efficiency and industrial production level of this enzyme.
(3)
This tannase will be applied in feed processing and agricultural by-product utilization to realize practical popularization and application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.G. and Y.L.; methodology, Y.G., W.W., X.Z., Y.L. and C.H.; software, C.H.; validation, Y.G., C.H. and Y.L.; formal analysis, W.W., D.U., F.T. and J.L. (Jiuyue Li); investigation, D.U., X.Z., G.G., F.T., J.L. (Jianyong Liang) and J.L. (Jiuyue Li); resources, H.J. and S.X.; data curation, D.U., X.Z., G.G., Y.H. and S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G.; writing—review and editing, H.J. and S.X.; visualization, C.H., Y.H., S.W. and J.L.(Jianyong Liang); supervision, Y.H. and H.J.; project administration, S.X., Y.H. and S.W.; funding acquisition, H.J., S.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Support Fund Project of Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences: Synergistic Treatment of High-Fiber Feed Resources by Cell Wall Breaking Combined with Bacteria-Enzyme Technology and Development of Diversified Diets for Cattle and Sheep (No. 2026KYBZM03); Key Special Project of the “Science & Technology Revitalizing Inner Mongolia” Initiative: Research and Demonstration on Key Technologies for Shrub Feed Processing (No. 2022EEDSKJXM001-3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Chenguang Hu, Wurilege Wei, Delhei Urjid, Yuchao Hu, Xiaojuan Zhao, Yang Liu, Guoqing Guo, Surigalatu Wang, Feng Tian, Jianyong Liang, Jiuyue Li, Hai Jin and Shuyuan Xue for their valuable guidance and support throughout the research process. We also appreciate the support provided by the Inner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences for the smooth completion of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rira, M.; Morgavi, D.P.; Popova, M.; Maxin, G.; Doreau, M. Microbial Colonisation of Tannin-Rich Tropical Plants: Interplay between Degradability, Methane Production and Tannin Disappearance in the Rumen. Animal 2022, 16, 100589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Dai, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhuang, J.; Yao, S.; Liu, L.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, K.; Wang, Y.; Xie, D.; Bennetzen, J.L.; et al. Discovery and Characterization of Tannase Genes in Plants: Roles in Hydrolysis of Tannins. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1104–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Bharathiraja, S.; Suriya, J.; Krishnan, M.; Manivasagan, P.; Kim, S.-K. Production of Enzymes from Agricultural Wastes and Their Potential Industrial Applications. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 80, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Jana, A.; Halder, S.K.; Banerjee, A.; Paul, T.; Pati, B.R.; Mondal, K.C.; Das Mohapatra, P.K. Biosynthesis, Structural Architecture and Biotechnological Potential of Bacterial Tannase: A Molecular Advancement. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 157, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Song, L.; Wang, X.-C.; Feng, Z.-Q.; Guo, Y.-F.; Meng, G.-Q.; Wang, H.-Y. Biotransformation of Gallate Esters by a pH-Stable Tannase of Mangrove-Derived Yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1211621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Wu, J.; Zeng, H.; Zhong, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Deng, Z. Cloning, Purification and Characterization of a Novel Thermostable Recombinant Tannase from Galactobacillus timonensis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2025, 184, 110575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Leangnim, N.; Aisara, J.; Unban, K.; Khanongnuch, C.; Kanpiengjai, A. Acid Stable Yeast Cell-Associated Tannase with High Capability in Gallated Catechin Biotransformation. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Rodríguez, H.; de las Rivas, B.; Gómez-Cordovés, C.; Muñoz, R. Characterization of Tannase Activity in Cell-Free Extracts of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 748T. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 121, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Jiménez, N.; Esteban-Torres, M.; Mancheño, J.M.; de las Rivas, B.; Muñoz, R. Tannin Degradation by a Novel Tannase Enzyme Present in Some Lactobacillus plantarum Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2991–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Pulido-Mateos, E.C.; Lessard-Lord, J.; Guyonnet, D.; Desjardins, Y.; Roy, D. Comprehensive Analysis of the Metabolic and Genomic Features of Tannin-Transforming Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 22406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Pan, H.; Zhan, J.; Yang, H.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, H.; Lu, X.; Su, X.; Tian, Y. Improving the Acid Resistance of Tannase TanBLp (AB379685) from Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC14917T by Site-Specific Mutagenesis. Indian J. Microbiol. 2022, 62, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Z.-Y.; Yu, X.-Z. Engineering Bacillus subtilis for High-Value Bioproduction: Recent Advances and Applications. Microb. Cell Factories 2025, 24, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Oggioni, M.R.; Pozzi, G.; Valensin, P.E.; Galieni, P.; Bigazzi, C. Recurrent Septicemia in an Immunocompromised Patient Due to Probiotic Strains of Bacillus subtilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 325–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Ueda, S.; Nomoto, R.; Yoshida, K.; Osawa, R. Comparison of Three Tannases Cloned from Closely Related Lactobacillus Species: L. Plantarum, L. Paraplantarum, and L. Pentosus. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Smith, M.C.M. Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus. FEBS Lett. 1991, 287, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; Coulson, A.R. DNA Sequencing with Chain-Terminating Inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5463–5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-1-936113-42-2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Maczulak, A.E. Encyclopedia of Microbiology; Facts on File Science Library; Facts on File: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-1-4381-3406-2. [Google Scholar]
  19. He, Q.; Guo, K.; Wang, L.; Xie, F.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, X.; He, Z.; Wang, P.; Li, S.; Huang, Y.; et al. Tannins Amount Determines Whether Tannase-Containing Bacteria Are Probiotic or Pathogenic in IBD. Life Sci. Alliance 2023, 6, e202201702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Yang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Cao, L. Biotransformation Technology and High-Value Application of Rapeseed Meal: A Review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2022, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. de Las Rivas, B.; Rodríguez, H.; Anguita, J.; Muñoz, R. Bacterial Tannases: Classification and Biochemical Properties. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 603–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. He, X.S.; Shyu, Y.T.; Nathoo, S.; Wong, S.L.; Doi, R.H. Construction and Use of a Bacillus subtilis Mutant Deficient in Multiple Protease Genes for the Expression of Eukaryotic Genes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1991, 646, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Shin, H.-D.; Chen, R.R.; Wang, N.S.; Li, J.; Du, G.; Chen, J. Developing Bacillus spp. as a Cell Factory for Production of Microbial Enzymes and Industrially Important Biochemicals in the Context of Systems and Synthetic Biology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6113–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Johnsen, P.J.; Dubnau, D.; Levin, B.R. Episodic Selection and the Maintenance of Competence and Natural Transformation in Bacillus subtilis. Genetics 2009, 181, 1521–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Simonen, M.; Palva, I. Protein Secretion in Bacillus Species. Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 57, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wu, X.C.; Lee, W.; Tran, L.; Wong, S.L. Engineering a Bacillus subtilis Expression-Secretion System with a Strain Deficient in Six Extracellular Proteases. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 4952–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Zhang, X.-Z.; Cui, Z.-L.; Hong, Q.; Li, S.-P. High-Level Expression and Secretion of Methyl Parathion Hydrolase in Bacillus subtilis WB800. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4101–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Zhang, S.; Cao, Y.; Cheng, H. Expression of Aspergillus Niger N5-5 in E. coli and Purification and Identification of Products. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Li, D.; Ni, K.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Yang, F. Fermentation Characteristics, Chemical Composition and Microbial Community of Tropical Forage Silage under Different Temperatures. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Nie, Y.; Yan, W.; Xu, Y.; Chen, W.B.; Mu, X.Q.; Wang, X.; Xiao, R. High-Level Expression of Bacillus naganoensis Pullulanase from Recombinant Escherichia coli with Auto-Induction: Effect of lac Operator. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Liu, M.; Hao, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Zhou, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Kang, X.; Lyu, M.; Wang, S. Heterologous Overproduction of a Dextranase in Bacillus subtilis WB600 and Its Application in Preparation of Porous Buckwheat Starch. Food Biosci. 2024, 58, 103636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Gong, J.-S.; Ye, J.-P.; Tao, L.-Y.; Su, C.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Xu, Z.-H.; Shi, J.-S. Efficient Keratinase Expression via Promoter Engineering Strategies for Degradation of Feather Wastes. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 137, 109550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Chang, C.; Gong, S.; Liu, Z.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z. High Level Expression and Biochemical Characterization of an Alkaline Serine Protease from Geobacillus stearothermophilus to Prepare Antihypertensive Whey Protein Hydrolysate. BMC Biotechnol. 2021, 21, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Ye, Z.; Zhang, P.; Tian, Z.; Huang, Y. Optimization Strategy of Expression Vectors and Regulatory Elements for Enhanced Protein Production in Bacillus subtilis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Phan, T.T.P.; Nguyen, H.D.; Schumann, W. Novel Plasmid-Based Expression Vectors for Intra- and Extracellular Production of Recombinant Proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Protein Expr. Purif. 2006, 46, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PCR identification of recombinant vector. Figure legend—M: Marker, 1: TanLpl-p43NMK, 2: TanLpl-pHT43.
Figure 1. PCR identification of recombinant vector. Figure legend—M: Marker, 1: TanLpl-p43NMK, 2: TanLpl-pHT43.
Microorganisms 14 01233 g001
Figure 2. PCR identification of random positive clones. Figure legend—M: Marker, 1: BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK), 2: BS168(pHT43), 3: WB600(pHT43).
Figure 2. PCR identification of random positive clones. Figure legend—M: Marker, 1: BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK), 2: BS168(pHT43), 3: WB600(pHT43).
Microorganisms 14 01233 g002
Figure 3. BS168(p43NMK), BS168(pHT43) and WB600 (pHT43) SDS-PAGE electrophoretogram. Figure legend—M: Marker, 1: BS168, 2: WB600, 3: BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK), 4: BS168(pHT43), 5: WB600(pHT43).
Figure 3. BS168(p43NMK), BS168(pHT43) and WB600 (pHT43) SDS-PAGE electrophoretogram. Figure legend—M: Marker, 1: BS168, 2: WB600, 3: BS168(TanLpl-p43NMK), 4: BS168(pHT43), 5: WB600(pHT43).
Microorganisms 14 01233 g003
Figure 4. Growth curves of BS168, WB600, BS168 (p43NMK), BS168(pHT43), WB600 (pHT43).
Figure 4. Growth curves of BS168, WB600, BS168 (p43NMK), BS168(pHT43), WB600 (pHT43).
Microorganisms 14 01233 g004
Figure 5. Effect of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the tannase activities of BS168(p43NMK), BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43).
Figure 5. Effect of temperature (A) and pH (B) on the tannase activities of BS168(p43NMK), BS168(pHT43) and WB600(pHT43).
Microorganisms 14 01233 g005
Table 1. Plasmids and strains.
Table 1. Plasmids and strains.
NameSource
E. coli/B. subtilis shuttle vector p43NMKHangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou, China) Co., Ltd.
E. coli B. subtilis shuttle vector pHT43Hangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
E.coli DH5α competent cellsHangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
Bacillus subtilis 168In-house strain
Bacillus subtilis WB600In-house strain
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC14917TAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC)
T4 DNA ligase Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing, China) Co., Ltd.
Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
DL2000 DNA marker Hangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
2 × Superpfu PCR mix Hangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
2 × Taq PCR mix Hangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
2 × pfu PCR mixHangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
5 × Seamless Cloning mixHangzhou Baosai Biotechnology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
λDNA HindIII digest DNA markerThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, WA, USA
4 × SDS loading bufferTIANGEN Biotech (Beijing, China) Co., Ltd.
SDS-PAGE gelsTIANGEN Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Coomassie Brilliant BlueTIANGEN Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Agarose gel DNA recovery kitTIANGEN Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Plasmid extraction kitTIANGEN Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Easy Geno Assembly MixTIANGEN Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Table 2. Culture media and electroporation buffer.
Table 2. Culture media and electroporation buffer.
MediumSources or Compositions (g/L)
LB liquid mediumGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangzhou, China) Co., Ltd.
LB agar mediumGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
Potato dextrose broth (PDB)Guangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
Potato dextrose agar (PDA)Guangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
LB liquid medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL kanamycinGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
LB liquid medium supplemented with 15 μg/mL chloramphenicolGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
LB agar medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL kanamycinGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
LB agar medium supplemented with 15 μg/mL chloramphenicolGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
LB liquid medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillinGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
LB agar medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillinGuangdong Huankai Microbial Science & Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.
Growth mediumtryptone 10, yeast extract 5, NaCl 10, sorbitol 0.5 mol
Electroporation buffersorbitol 0.5 mol, mannitol 0.5 mol, glycerol 10%.
Electroporation recovery mediumtryptone 10, yeast extract 5, NaCl 10, sorbitol 0.5 mol, mannitol 0.38 mol
Table 3. PCR primer information.
Table 3. PCR primer information.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence (5′→3′)
TanLpl-FATGAGTAACCGATTGATTTTTGA
TanLpl-RTCATTGGCACAAGCCATCAATCC
TanLpl-p43-FGGTACCAAGAGAGGAATGTACACATGAGTAACCGATTGATTTTTGA
TanLpl-p43-RGATTACGCCAAGCTTTTATCATTGGCACAAGCCATCAATCC
p43NMK-hindIIIFAAGCTTGGCGTAATCATGGTC
pHT43-hindIIIFCCAAGCTTAAAGGAGGACACGCATGAGTTC
p43-RTGTACATTCCTCTCTTGGTACCGCTATCACTTTATATT
p43NMK-FGTATGTTTTCGCTTGAACTTTTA
p43NMK-RAGCTGGCACGACAGGTTTCCCGA
pHT43-FTTGCGGTTTCAGCGTATTG
pHT43-RGGCTCAGCGCCTGTTCTT
Table 4. PCR amplification system.
Table 4. PCR amplification system.
Composition Components in Molecular Biology ProtocolsVolume Specifications in Molecular Biology Protocols
2 × pfu PCR mix25 μL
Upstream primer2 μL
Reverse primer2 μL
DNA template2 μL
ddH2O19 μL
Total reaction volume50 μL
Table 5. Seamless clone link reaction system.
Table 5. Seamless clone link reaction system.
Composition Components in Molecular Biology ProtocolsVolume Specifications in Molecular Biology Protocols
5 × seamless cloning mix2 μL
Gel-purified TanLpl amplicon fragment6 μL
p43NMK backbone fragment2 μL
Total reaction volume10 μL
Table 6. PCR amplification system.
Table 6. PCR amplification system.
Composition Components in Molecular Biology ProtocolsVolume Specifications in Molecular Biology Protocols
2 × Taq PCR mix10 μL
Upstream primer0.5 μL
Reverse primer0.5 μL
Monoclonal bacterial culture0.5 μL
ddH2O8.5 μL
Total reaction volume20 μL
Table 7. Seamless clone link reaction system.
Table 7. Seamless clone link reaction system.
Composition Components in Molecular Biology ProtocolsVolume Specifications in Molecular Biology Protocols
5 × seamless cloning mix2 μL
Gel-purified TanLpl amplicon fragment6 μL
pHT43 backbone fragment2 μL
Total reaction volume10 μL
Table 8. Plasmid loss rates of recombinant bacteria (%).
Table 8. Plasmid loss rates of recombinant bacteria (%).
GenerationsBS168(p43NMK)BS168(pHT43)WB600(pHT43)p-Value
12.52 ± 0.449 c6.55 ± 0.310 b8.69 ± 0.958 a<0.001
25.33 ± 0.109 c6.57 ± 2.710 b8.82 ± 1.012 a<0.001
38.05 ± 4.942 a6.77 ± 0.882 b7.69 ± 2.027 c<0.001
412.06 ± 0.251 a11.92 ± 2.111 a9.31 ± 3.863 b<0.001
524.05 ± 3.163 a13.86 ± 3.093 b9.92 ± 0.009 c<0.001
628.03 ± 2.133 a16.53 ± 0.049 b14.72 ± 0.161 c<0.001
731.44 ± 3.098 a18.85 ± 0.629 c19.14 ± 0.489 b<0.001
855.37 ± 2.109 a25.75 ± 3.768 c27.27 ± 3.843 b<0.001
993.07 ± 1.916 a37.84 ± 1.308 b30.81 ± 2.189 c<0.001
1098.72 ± 1.443 a44.88 ± 3.117 b 42.11 ± 2.189 c<0.001
Note: Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same column differ significantly (at p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant difference.
Table 9. Enzyme activities of recombinant bacteria under optimal conditions.
Table 9. Enzyme activities of recombinant bacteria under optimal conditions.
Strain DesignationTannase Activity (U/mL)
BS168(p43NMK)68.81 ± 3.16 c
BS168(pHT43)397.36 ± 29.33 b
WB600(pHT43)461.12 ± 10.01 a
p-value<0.001
Note: Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same column differ significantly (at p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant difference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, Y.; Hu, C.; Wei, W.; Urjid, D.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Guo, G.; Wang, S.; Tian, F.; et al. Construction and Evaluation of High-Efficiency Tannase-Producing Strains. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061233

AMA Style

Gao Y, Hu C, Wei W, Urjid D, Hu Y, Zhao X, Liu Y, Guo G, Wang S, Tian F, et al. Construction and Evaluation of High-Efficiency Tannase-Producing Strains. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(6):1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Yuan, Chenguang Hu, Wurilege Wei, Delhei Urjid, Yuchao Hu, Xiaojuan Zhao, Yang Liu, Guoqing Guo, Surigalatu Wang, Feng Tian, and et al. 2026. "Construction and Evaluation of High-Efficiency Tannase-Producing Strains" Microorganisms 14, no. 6: 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061233

APA Style

Gao, Y., Hu, C., Wei, W., Urjid, D., Hu, Y., Zhao, X., Liu, Y., Guo, G., Wang, S., Tian, F., Liang, J., Li, J., Jin, H., & Xue, S. (2026). Construction and Evaluation of High-Efficiency Tannase-Producing Strains. Microorganisms, 14(6), 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061233

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop