Endophytic Fungi Inoculation Reduces Ramulosis Severity in Gossypium hirsutum Plants

Biotic stress in cotton plants caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides triggers symptoms of ramulosis, a disease characterized by necrotic spots on young leaves, followed by death of the affected branch’s apical meristem, plant growth paralysis, and stimulation of lateral bud production. Severe cases of ramulosis can cause up to 85% yield losses in cotton plantations. Currently, this disease is controlled exclusively by using fungicides. However, few studies have focused on biological alternatives for mitigating the effects of contamination by C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides on cotton plants. Thus, the hypothesis raised is that endophytic fungi isolated from an Arecaceae species (Butia purpurascens), endemic to the Cerrado biome, have the potential to reduce physiological damage caused by ramulosis, decreasing its severity in these plants. This hypothesis was tested using plants grown from seeds contaminated with the pathogen and inoculated with strains of Gibberella moniliformis (BP10EF), Hamigera insecticola (BP33EF), Codinaeopsis sp. (BP328EF), G. moniliformis (BP335EF), and Aspergillus sp. (BP340EF). C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides is a leaf pathogen; thus, the evaluations were focused on leaf parameters: gas exchange, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and oxidative metabolism. The hypothesis that inoculation with endophytic strains can mitigate physiological and photochemical damage caused by ramulosis in cotton was confirmed, as the fungi improved plant growth and stomatal index and density, increased net photosynthetic rate (A) and carboxylation efficiency (A/Ci), and decreased photochemical stress (ABS/RC and DI0/RC) and oxidative stress by reducing enzyme activity (CAT, SOD, and APX) and the synthesis of malondialdehyde (MDA). Control plants developed leaves with a low adaxial stomatal index and density to reduce colonization of leaf tissues by C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides due to the absence of fungal antagonism. The Codinaeopsis sp. strain BP328EF can efficiently inhibit C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides in vitro (81.11% relative inhibition), improve gas exchange parameters, reduce photochemical stress of chlorophyll-a, and decrease lipid peroxidation in attacked leaves. Thus, BP328EF should be further evaluated for its potential effect as a biological alternative for enhancing the resistance of G. hirsutum plants and minimizing yield losses caused by C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides.


Introduction
Plants under biotic stress experience metabolic disturbances induced by pathogenic microorganisms [1].These disturbances can lead to diseases with a variety of symptoms, including chlorosis, wilting, localized lesions, and large necroses.Currently, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is one of the most affected crops by biotic stress, as many pests, such as insects and phytopathogenic microorganisms, attack plants throughout their cycle, causing damage to different plant parts and resulting in significant economic losses [2].Cotton is the world's leading source of natural fibers, with an estimated planted area of more than 32 million hectares in the 2023-2024 crop season [3], although the negative impacts of pathogen attacks gradually increase global production costs [4].Bacteria and fungi that attack leaves, stems, roots, and fruits are among the most important causes of cotton diseases.
The main cotton-producing regions in South America are affected by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides.Severe outbreaks cause significant reductions in production, often associated with meristem necrosis, excessive sprouting, branching, and stunting [11].This fungus infects leaves, petioles, and stems, hindering bract formation and, consequently, cotton yield [12]. Damage caused by ramulosis to cotton crops varies from 20% to 30%, reaching 85% in severe cases [13].This disease has been exclusively controlled using chemical products, which leads to disease outbreaks by promoting pathogen resistance.Persistent challenges associated with the use of traditional fungicides also include toxicity to humans and non-target organisms, as well as environmental pollution [14].Thus, the development of biological alternatives for ramulosis management in cotton plantations has been encouraged.In this context, the use of endophytic fungi is a promising option, as several species act as biocontrol agents against pests and diseases, enabling a sustainable suppression of phytopathogens [15][16][17].Many endophytic fungi are potential resources for biocontrol, as they reduce the effects or prevent diseases in plants not only through direct or indirect antibiosis but also by promoting growth and improving resistance in host plants [18].On the other hand, tests need to be seriously conducted, as endophytic isolates can, under some conditions, exert negative effects on the host plant [19].
Endophytic fungi have been tested for biocontrol of important cotton diseases such as Verticillium wilt e.g., [20][21][22] and root rot e.g., [23].However, few studies have been conducted under in vitro conditions, focusing on the biological control of C. gossypii [24,25], and even fewer under greenhouse or field conditions.Investigations into alternative biological perspectives for controlling C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides are also scarce e.g., [26].
Studies have shown that C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides is transmitted externally and internally by seeds, which are the most efficient dissemination agents.Seeds carry this pathogen over short and long distances, leading to the introduction of ramulosis in new areas [27].Therefore, cotton seeds were infected by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides to test the hypothesis that endophytic fungi isolated from an Arecaceae species (Butia purpurascens), which is endemic to the Cerrado biome [28], have the potential to mitigate physiological damage caused by ramulosis, decreasing its severity in G. hirsutum plants.The present study contributes to the search for conservation strategies based on the use of available biodiversity resources.In this context, the Cerrado biome has been an important source of microorganisms of biotechnological interest that can establish symbiotic relationships with agricultural species [29,30].The use of strains from the Cerrado microbiota for producing biocontrol agents promotes the valorization of the biome's biodiversity and awareness for its conservation.
C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides is a hemibiotrophic pathogen that initially infects through a biotrophic stage, associated with large primary intracellular hyphae, and subsequently in the necrotrophic stage, when the fungus causes significant changes in the cotton physiology due to secretion of lytic enzymes and nonspecific toxins [12], as narrower secondary hyphae spread throughout the host's tissues [31].From a physiological perspective, photosynthetic processes such as gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence are among the most damaged by pathogens that infect leaves, such as C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides [32].Several studies have shown that pathogen infections lead to reduced photosynthesis [33][34][35] and changes in photosystems [36].These plants are affected by mesophyll cell damage, colonization of intra-and intercellular spaces, and stomatal closure, affecting transpiration, CO 2 influx, and photosynthetic rate [37,38].Thus, cotton plants biotically stressed by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides and, consequently, exhibiting ramulosis symptoms were chosen for evaluation to better understand the effects of inoculation with endophytic fungi on the physiology of these plants.
Besides the biocontrol of cotton diseases, endophytic fungi can increase the availability of organic cotton in the market, whose production is encouraged by consumer interests and industry certification standards [39].Organic fibers are used in several products, and organic cottonseeds are utilized in animal feed and organic oil manufacturing.Therefore, induced resistance and biological control resulting from inoculation are expected to minimize impacts caused by biotic stress in cotton plants, as it is a key practice in sustainable agriculture, not only to control diseases caused by phytopathogens but also to reduce production costs [40].Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the effect of endophytic fungi inoculation on plant growth, gas exchange, photochemistry, and oxidative stress of G. hirsutum plants infected by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides and, therefore, ramulosis exhibiting symptoms.This study focused on developing an alternative for minimizing losses caused by C. gossypii in cotton yield by improving plant performance under biotic stress.

Isolated Fungi and Seeds Contaminated with C. gossypii var. cephalosporioides
Tests were conducted using root-endophytic strains isolated from Butia purpurascens (Arecaceae).These strains are currently part of the culture collection at the Agricultural Microbiology Laboratory of the Federal Institute Goiano, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil.The strains were cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar medium (infusion of 200 g of potato, 20 g of dextrose, and 15 g of agar) for 7 days at 30 • C to obtain replicates of each culture.The evaluated strains were: BP10EF (Gibberella moniliformis), BP33EF (Hamigera insecticola), BP328EF (Codinaeopsis sp.), BP335EF (Gibberella moniliformis), and BP340EF (Aspergillus sp.).These strains were chosen because they exhibited antibiosis to C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides in previously conducted tests (see Section 2.2).
Cotton seeds contaminated with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides were obtained through phytosanitary quality tests.Seeds of the variety TMG47-B2RF/2021 from 4 seed lots, free from treatment with fungicide or insecticide, were evaluated on germination paper.They were arranged on paper sheets moistened with distilled water, covered with plastic film, and placed in a BOD chamber, where they remained for 4 days at 35 • C (Figure 1a).Infestation with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides was confirmed in 63% of the seeds, and one of the seed lots was used for the in vivo experiment.
Three seeds contaminated with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides were aseptically placed on a plate containing PDA medium.These seeds were used to establish fungal cultures, which were purified and taken to the Biological Institute of São Paulo for molecular identification (Figure 1b,c).All cultures were molecularly identified as belonging to the species C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides.The identification was performed by partial sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer and the calmodulin and β-tubulin genes.For this, amplicons of 575, 532, and 478 nucleotides were obtained for these respective genes.Sequencing was performed using the Sanger method; for phylogenetic inference, sequences were paired by similarity to sequences in GenBank using BLASTn while considering homology greater than 99%.Three seeds contaminated with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides were aseptically placed on a plate containing PDA medium.These seeds were used to establish fungal cultures, which were purified and taken to the Biological Institute of São Paulo for molecular identification (Figure 1b,c).All cultures were molecularly identified as belonging to the species C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides.The identification was performed

In Vitro Antibiosis Tests
In vitro antibiosis tests using the paired culture technique were performed to better understand the interaction between C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides and the endophytic strains tested.Thus, 5-cm-diameter mycelial discs of the phytopathogen and endophytic fungi were placed equidistantly on plates containing BDA medium.These plates were then incubated at 30 • C and left to rest for 72 h, when the diameters of colony halos were measured.Plates with the phytopathogen, without inoculation with the endophytic strains, were used as controls.
The test was conducted in triplicate for each endophytic strain tested, and the data were used to estimate the percentage of inhibition of phytopathogenic fungus growth induced by the endophytic strains.This was calculated through the relative inhibition index (RII): where RC = radius of the phytopathogen colony in the control treatment; and RX = radius of the phytopathogen colony paired with the endophytic strain.

Preparation of the Plant Substrate and Seed Planting
The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at the Tissue Culture Laboratory of the Federal Institute Goiano, in Rio Verde, GO, Brazil, from June to August 2022, at mean air temperature of 30.26 • C and relative air humidity of 29.43%.
The seeds were sanitized before planting through the asepsis process described by Reis et al. [41] to remove epiphytic microorganisms and ensure that only the endogenous contaminant C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides remained.The seeds were left to rest for 30 min and then planted in 3-kg pots containing a mixture of soil and nutritional substrate (Bioplant Garden ® , Bio Plant Life, Santa Ana, CA, USA) at concentrations of 70% and 30%, respectively.This mixture was previously sterilized at 121 • C for 30 min to avoid interaction of seeds with microorganisms and subsequently kept in impermeable bags; it was placed in the pots only at the time of planting.
Five seeds were sown per pot, arranged in 3-cm-deep furrows; 5-mm-diameter mycelial discs of the tested endophytic fungi were inoculated directly onto the seeds to provide a simultaneous development of hyphae and radicles (Figure 1d,e).
The plants were evaluated daily for visual symptoms of ramulosis up to the V2 developmental stage.Some plants presented disease symptoms at the V0 stage (cotyledon) 14 days after planting, presenting small, dark, circular necrotic lesions, like those described by Talhinhas and Baroncelli [31] for lesions caused by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides in the early stages of cotton development.Most plants presented differentiated leaf development and wrinkling of leaf blades 21 days after planting.Thinning was carried out at this time, maintaining only seedlings with ramulosis symptoms in the pots (two plants per pot) (Figure 1f,g).Emergence of leaf lesions, followed by a halt in branch growth, as well as emergence of new lateral buds, were found 30 days after planting.These new branches tended to form clusters characterized by an excess of nodes and internodes, resulting in plants with a bushy appearance, consistent with those described by Araújo [27] for infections by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides in cotton plants.Thus, the occurrence of ramulosis was confirmed in all evaluated plants.The plants were irrigated daily according to their needs over the experimental period.

Biometric, Gas Exchange, and Chlorophyll-a Fluorescence Evaluations
Biometric and physiological evaluations were performed 30 days after planting, when ramulosis symptoms were confirmed in all cotton plants, at the vegetative phenological stage.Data on plant height (cm), stem diameter (cm), number of leaves, and shoot fresh and dry weights (g) were obtained.Dry weight was obtained after drying the plants in a forced air circulation oven at 65 • C until constant weight.
Physiology and antioxidant metabolism analyses were performed when the plants reached the V5 stage.Gas exchanges were evaluated using an infrared gas analyzer equipped with a fluorometer (LI-6400xt; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) to determine net photosynthetic rate (A; µmol m −2 s −1 ); intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci); stomatal conductance of water vapor (gs); transpiration rate (E mmol m −2 s −1 ); and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO 2 concentration (Ci/Ca).Measurements were always made on the youngest fully expanded leaf facing the sun, between 08:00 h and 11:00 h, using constant photosynthetically active radiation (1000 µmol photons m −2 s −1 ), with records of atmospheric CO 2 concentration, relative air humidity, air temperature, and radiation.The carboxylation efficiency of plants was calculated using A/Ci.
The OJIP chlorophyll-a fluorescence was estimated using a portable fluorometer (Flu-orPen FP 100; Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech Republic).The fourth leaf of all sampled units was previously dark-adapted for 30 min for complete oxidation of the photosynthetic electron transport system and then subjected to a 3000 µmol m −2 s −1 pulse of blue light to measure the minimum fluorescence (F 0 ) at 50 µs, when all photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers are open and defined as step O, followed by step J (2 ms), step I (30 ms), and maximum fluorescence (F M ), when all PSII reaction centers are closed, known as step P.These values were used to estimate several bioenergetic indices of PSII, according to Strasser et al. [42].
The parameters estimated were: relatively low values of specific light absorption flux per active reaction center (ABS/RC); trapped per reaction center (TR 0 /RC); electron transport flux per reaction center (ET 0 /RC); specific energy dissipation flux at the antenna chlorophyll level (DI 0 /RC); photosynthetic performance index (PI ABS ), which incorporates the cascade of energy events from initial absorption to PQ reduction; maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (PHI P0 ); quantum yield of energy dissipation (PHI D0 ); and quantum yield of electron transport (PHI E0 ).

Extraction and Activity of Antioxidant Metabolism Enzymes and Malondialdehyde (MDA)
The activity of enzymes from the antioxidant and lipid peroxidation systems was quantified.Samples were collected, placed in liquid nitrogen, and stored in an ultrafreezer at −80 • C.
Enzyme extraction was carried out as follows: 200 mg of leaf tissues were macerated in liquid nitrogen with 50% PVPP and following the extraction protocol proposed by Biemelt et al. [43], with an extraction buffer composed of 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM ascorbic acid.The extract was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 10 min at 4 • C, and the supernatant was used to evaluate the activity of catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD).
CAT activity was evaluated according to the methodology proposed by Havir and McHale [44]: An aliquot of the enzyme extract was added to an incubation medium containing 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) and 12.5 mM hydrogen peroxide.Enzyme activity was determined based on the consumption of H 2 O 2 every 15 s for 3 min at 240 nm in a spectrophotometer.The molar extinction coefficient used was 36 mM −1 cm −1 .CAT activity was expressed as µmol H 2 O 2 min −1 mg −1 protein.
APX activity was evaluated using the methodology of Nakano and Asada [45], considering an ascorbate oxidation rate of 290 nm every 15 s for 3 min.An aliquot of the enzyme extract was added to a medium containing 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, and 0.1 mM peroxide of hydrogen.The molar extinction coefficient used was 2.8 mM −1 cm −1 .APX activity was expressed as µmol AsA min −1 mg −1 protein.
POD activity was evaluated using the methodology of Fang and Kao [46], considering the formation of tetraguaiacol by the increase in absorbance.An aliquot of the enzyme extract was added to a medium containing 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 0.13% guaiacol; 0.15% H 2 O 2 was added before the spectrophotometric readings at 470 nm for 3 min.The molar extinction coefficient used was 26.6 mM −1 cm −1 .POD activity was expressed as µmol H 2 O 2 min −1 mg −1 protein.Proteins from leaf samples were quantified according to the Bradford method [47].The absorbances were read at 595 nm, and the final data were used to express the enzyme activities.
SOD activity was determined based on the methodology of Giannopolitis and Ries [48], considering the enzyme's ability to inhibit photoreduction of nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT).An aliquot of the extract was incubated in a medium containing 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.8), 14 mM methionine, 0.1 µM EDTA, 75 µM NBT, and 2 µM riboflavin.The samples, along with the incubation medium, were illuminated with a 20-W fluorescent lamp for 7 min.Readings were taken with a spectrophotometer at 560 nm.SOD activity was expressed as U mg −1 protein (1U = quantity of enzymes needed to inhibit NBT photoreduction by 50%).
Malondialdehyde (MDA) was quantified by macerating 200 mg of leaf tissue in liquid nitrogen and PVPP, followed by homogenization in 0.1% (m v −1 ) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifugation at 10,000× g for 15 min at 4 • C. The amount of MDA was determined using the methodology proposed by Buege and Aust [49].

Experimental Design and Statistical Analyses
The in vitro antibiosis experiment was conducted in a completely randomized experimental design with 5 treatments (exposure of the phytopathogen to five endophytic fungal strains), and the greenhouse experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with 6 treatments (5 endophytic fungal strains and a control).Plants inoculated with culture medium discs without mycelium were used as controls.The experiments were conducted with five replications per treatment, considering two plants per pot as one replication, totaling 60 units.The data obtained for the treatments were subjected to a one-way ANOVA to evaluate the effect of inoculation with endophytic strains.When the effects were significant, the means were evaluated by Tukey's test at a 5% significance level.Subsequently, all variables that showed significant differences were jointly evaluated in a correlation matrix and connected by means of principal component analysis (PCA).Considering that these variables had different units of measurement, PCA was recovered using standardized data to obtain a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.The number of principal components was defined according to eigenvalues (>1.0) and variance explained (>70%).The statistical tests were conducted using the R 4.3.2program [50].
The similarity matrix was developed to estimate similarities or differences among plants from different treatments.The similarity index was obtained using the Pearson correlation coefficient, with values of r transformed into d = (1 − r) × 100 to estimate the distance (d).A dendrogram was then recovered using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA), with an adjustment between the distance matrix and the dendrogram estimated by the cophenetic correlation coefficient [51].This analysis was conducted using the DendroUPGMA program [52].

Antibiosis of Endophytic Strains of Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides
The antibiosis test showed expressive mycelial development of all endophytic fungal strains in relation to the phytopathogen, which resulted in the inhibition of growth of C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides (Figure 2a-e).The estimated relative inhibition index (RII) confirmed the potential of all endophytic strains to inhibit the in vitro growth of C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides, as the mean RIIs found were, in general, higher than 72% (Figure 2b).However, the comparison of strains showed that BP328EF (Codinaeopsis sp.) and BP335 (Gibberella moniliformis) were more effective in inhibiting the phytopathogen, showing the highest RII means (81.11% and 79.81%, respectively).gossypii var.cephalosporioides (Figure 2a-e).The estimated relative inhibition index (RII) confirmed the potential of all endophytic strains to inhibit the in vitro growth of C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides, as the mean RIIs found were, in general, higher than 72% (Figure 2b).However, the comparison of strains showed that BP328EF (Codinaeopsis sp.) and BP335 (Gibberella moniliformis) were more effective in inhibiting the phytopathogen, showing the highest RII means (81.11% and 79.81%, respectively).

Growth and Physiology of Cotton Plants Infected by Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides and Subjected to Inoculation with Endophytic Strains
In general, the inoculation with endophytic fungi positively affected the development of cotton plants infected with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides.Control plants presented a lower mean height (17.31 cm) than plants inoculated with BP10EF (24.17 cm) (Figure 3a).Stem diameter was also affected by fungal treatments; the highest means were found for plants inoculated with BP33EF (0.20 cm) (Figure 3b).Shoot fresh weight (33.50 g) and shoot dry weight (6.42 g) of control plants were also lower than those of inoculated plants; the highest means were found for plants inoculated with BP33EF (51.50 and 12.82 g, respectively) (Figure 3c,d).

Growth and Physiology of Cotton Plants Infected by Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides and Subjected to Inoculation with Endophytic Strains
In general, the inoculation with endophytic fungi positively affected the development of cotton plants infected with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides.Control plants presented a lower mean height (17.31 cm) than plants inoculated with BP10EF (24.17 cm) (Figure 3a).Stem diameter was also affected by fungal treatments; the highest means were found for plants inoculated with BP33EF (0.20 cm) (Figure 3b).Shoot fresh weight (33.50 g) and shoot dry weight (6.42 g) of control plants were also lower than those of inoculated plants; the highest means were found for plants inoculated with BP33EF (51.50 and 12.82 g, respectively) (Figure 3c,d).
Inoculation with endophytic fungi had no effect on the stomatal index or stomatal density on the adaxial surface of cotton leaves affected by ramulosis; however, on the adaxial surface, control plants had the lowest percentage of stomata (14.96%).However, plants subjected to the different endophytic strains did not show any difference in adaxial stomatal index (Figure 4a).Stomatal density showed similar results, with lower means in control plants (12.87) and in plants inoculated with BP340EF (20.72) (Figure 4b).
The inoculation treatments had no effect on intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci), which showed similar means to the control; however, Ci tended to increase in plants inoculated with BP33EF (268.24µmol (CO 2 ) m −2 s −1 ) and decrease in plants inoculated with BP340EF (241.49µmol (CO 2 ) m −2 s −1 ) (Figure 5a).Stomatal conductance (Gs) was higher in plants inoculated with BP328EF and BP335EF (respectively 0.30 and 0.26 mol (H 2 O) m −2 s −1 ) compared with control plants (0.23 mol (H 2 O) m −2 s −1 ) (Figure 5b).Carboxylation efficiency (A/Ci) was also affected by inoculation with endophytic strains, tending to be higher in plants inoculated with BP328EF (0.07) and lower in control plants (0.05).Inoculation with endophytic fungi had no effect on the stomatal index or stomatal density on the adaxial surface of cotton leaves affected by ramulosis; however, on the adaxial surface, control plants had the lowest percentage of stomata (14.96%).However, plants subjected to the different endophytic strains did not show any difference in adaxial stomatal index (Figure 4a).Stomatal density showed similar results, with lower means in control plants (12.87) and in plants inoculated with BP340EF (20.72) (Figure 4b).
Regarding gas exchanges, fungal inoculation, in general, tended to improve the net photosynthetic rate (A) in plants affected by ramulosis; however, higher A means were found for plants inoculated with BP328EF (19.53 µmol (CO2) m −2 s −1 ) (Figure 4c).Inoculation with BP328EF, however, significantly increased the transpiration rate (4.36 mmol (H2O) m −2 s −1 ); control plants had the lowest water loss (2.90 mmol (H2O) m −2 s −1 ) (Figure 4d).The inoculation treatments tended to reduce the light absorption flux per active reaction center (ABS/RC) of chlorophyll-a, as this index was high only in control plants (2.53) and in plants inoculated with BP33EF (2.58) (Figure 6a).The electron transport flux per reaction center (ET 0 /RC) was also higher in control plants (1.22), but was significantly lower in plants inoculated with BP328EF (1.07) (Figure 6b).The results found for the trapped energy flux per reaction center (TR 0 /RC) were similar to those of ET 0 /RC, with higher means in control plants (1.88) and lower in plants inoculated with BP328EF (1.78) (Figure 6c).The results found for the specific energy dissipation flux at the antenna chlorophyll level (DI 0 /RC) were identical to those found for ABS/RC, denoting higher energy dissipation as heat in control plants (0.55) and plants inoculated with BP33EF (0.54) (Figure 6d).The inoculation treatments had no effect on intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), which showed similar means to the control; however, Ci tended to increase in plants inoculated with BP33EF (268.24µmol (CO2) m −2 s −1 ) and decrease in plants inoculated with BP340EF (241.49µmol (CO2) m −2 s −1 ) (Figure 5a).Stomatal conductance (Gs) was higher in plants inoculated with BP328EF and BP335EF (respectively 0.30 and 0.26 mol (H2O) m −2 s −1 ) compared with control plants (0.23 mol (H2O) m −2 s −1 ) (Figure 5b).Carboxylation efficiency (A/Ci) was also affected by inoculation with endophytic strains, tending to be higher in plants inoculated with BP328EF (0.07) and lower in control plants (0.05).Inoculation with endophytic fungal strains maintained higher levels of maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (PHIP0) in cotton plants compared with control plants (0.78), except for plants inoculated with BP33EF (0.78) (Figure 7a).The quantum yield of energy dissipation (PHID0), however, showed opposite results, with the highest means in these same treatments, i.e., plants inoculated with BP33EF and control plants (0.21 and 0.20, respectively) (Figure 7b).However, the highest quantum yield of electron transport (PHIE0) was found in plants inoculated with BP340EF (0.49) (Figure 7c).The photosynthetic performance index (PIABS) was lower for chlorophylls of plants inoculated with BP33EF (2.07) and control plants (2.08) (Figure 7d).Inoculation with endophytic fungal strains maintained higher levels of maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (PHI P0 ) in cotton plants compared with control plants (0.78), except for plants inoculated with BP33EF (0.78) (Figure 7a).The quantum yield of energy dissipation (PHI D0 ), however, showed opposite results, with the highest means in these same treatments, i.e., plants inoculated with BP33EF and control plants (0.21 and 0.20, respectively) (Figure 7b).However, the highest quantum yield of electron transport (PHI E0 ) was found in plants inoculated with BP340EF (0.49) (Figure 7c).The photosynthetic performance index (PI ABS ) was lower for chlorophylls of plants inoculated with BP33EF (2.07) and control plants (2.08) (Figure 7d).Endophytic fungi inoculation in cotton plants exhibiting ramulosis symptoms considerably decreased CAT synthesis in leaf tissues; the highest mean CAT activity was found in control plants (260.27µmol (H2O) min −1 mg −1 protein) (Figure 8a).The enzyme POD showed opposite results, with lower mean activity in control plants (26,795.18µmol (H2O) min −1 mg −1 protein) and in plants inoculated with BP33EF (26,212.17µmol (H2O) min −1 mg −1 protein); this enzyme showed the highest mean activity in leaves of plants inoculated with BP335EF (85,554.79µmol (H2O) min −1 mg −1 protein) (Figure 8b).
The activity of the enzymes SOD and APX was similar to that found for CAT; it was stimulated mainly in control plants (0.010 U mg −1 protein for SOD and 3309.91 µmol AsA min −1 mg −1 protein for APX).However, plants in the different inoculation treatments showed no significant differences in the activity of these enzymes (Figure 9a,b).Lipid peroxidation (given by the amount of MDA) in control plants and plants inoculated with BP340EF tended to be higher (179.28 and 165.60 ηmol g −1 , respectively) (Figure 9c).Endophytic fungi inoculation in cotton plants exhibiting ramulosis symptoms considerably decreased CAT synthesis in leaf tissues; the highest mean CAT activity was found in control plants (260.27µmol (H 2 O) min −1 mg −1 protein) (Figure 8a).The enzyme POD showed opposite results, with lower mean activity in control plants (26,795.18µmol (H 2 O) min −1 mg −1 protein) and in plants inoculated with BP33EF (26,212.17µmol (H 2 O) min −1 mg −1 protein); this enzyme showed the highest mean activity in leaves of plants inoculated with BP335EF (85,554.79µmol (H 2 O) min −1 mg −1 protein) (Figure 8b).
The activity of the enzymes SOD and APX was similar to that found for CAT; it was stimulated mainly in control plants (0.010 U mg −1 protein for SOD and 3309.91 µmol AsA min −1 mg −1 protein for APX).However, plants in the different inoculation treatments showed no significant differences in the activity of these enzymes (Figure 9a,b).Lipid peroxidation (given by the amount of MDA) in control plants and plants inoculated with BP340EF tended to be higher (179.28 and 165.60 ηmol g −1 , respectively) (Figure 9c).Principal Components 1 and 2 together explained 99.0% of the data variance.This analysis confirmed the trend that oxidative metabolism (activity of enzymes CAT, APX, and SOD) and the cell damage caused by it, given the MDA production, were more active in control plants (Figure 10a).Similarly, control plants and plants inoculated with the endophytic strain BP33EF showed higher results for chlorophyll-a fluorescence parameters (ABS/RC, ET 0 /RC, TR 0 /RC, and DI 0 /RC), which are indicators of photochemical stress.Plants inoculated with BP33EF showed the best plant growth performance (stem diameter and shoot fresh and dry weights).Plants inoculated with BP10EF, BP328EF, BP335EF, and BP340EF showed the best photosynthetic indices and photochemical yields.The treatment with BP328EF explained the largest variations in the means of A, E, Gs, and A/Ci.The cluster analysis showed two stable clusters, confirming the efficiency of fungal inoculation and isolated control plants in the individual cluster (Figure 10b).The similarity between BP328EF and BP10EF grouped these plants in the same cluster, connected to BP33EF.However, divergent means of plant growth and photochemical variables found for BP33EF resulted in a slight separation.Another grouping was established by the similarity between the means found for BP335EF and BP340EF.
bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).
Principal Components 1 and 2 together explained 99.0% of the data variance.This analysis confirmed the trend that oxidative metabolism (activity of enzymes CAT, APX, and SOD) and the cell damage caused by it, given the MDA production, were more active in control plants (Figure 10a).Similarly, control plants and plants inoculated with the endophytic strain BP33EF showed higher results for chlorophyll-a fluorescence parameters (ABS/RC, ET0/RC, TR0/RC, and DI0/RC), which are indicators of photochemical stress.Plants inoculated with BP33EF showed the best plant growth performance (stem diameter and shoot fresh and dry weights).Plants inoculated with BP10EF, BP328EF, BP335EF, and BP340EF showed the best photosynthetic indices and photochemical yields.The treatment with BP328EF explained the largest variations in the means of A, E, Gs, and A/Ci.The cluster analysis showed two stable clusters, confirming the efficiency of fungal inoculation and isolated control plants in the individual cluster (Figure 10b).The similarity between BP328EF and BP10EF grouped these plants in the same cluster, connected to BP33EF.However, divergent means of plant growth and photochemical variables found for BP33EF resulted in a slight separation.Another grouping was established by the similarity between the means found for BP335EF and BP340EF.

Inoculation with Endophytic Fungi Mitigates Physiological and Photochemical Damage by Ramulosis in Cotton Plants
The results corroborate those presented by several studies in the literature, confirming the ability of some endophytic fungi to reduce lesions caused by pathogens through direct antibiosis, production of lytic enzymes, or activation of hormones [1].However, beneficial microorganisms compete strongly with pathogens for niche colonization and nutrient acquisition [53].Therefore, endophytic fungal strains can assist in the development of resistance to pests and diseases by affecting the pathogen's development or reproduction.Studies have confirmed that these fungi can activate ISR (induced systemic resistance) and ASR (acquired systemic resistance) by activating microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) [54][55][56].These patterns result in the production of signaling molecules, such as salicylic acid and ethylene.Thus, the colonization of endophytic fungi causes a first activation, making plants more capable of responding to phytopathogenic microorganisms and nematodes [57].However, the endophytic relationship possibly confers additional defense mechanisms to modulate the plant immune system because of the manipulation of antimicrobial metabolites, either directly, such as alkaloids, or indirectly, such as phytohormones, jasmonic acid, or salicylic acid [55].
The present study confirms the potential of endophytic fungi, biotrophic fungi, and/or necrotrophic fungi to mitigate the biotic stress caused by ramulosis in cotton.The tested strains BP10EF and BP335EF of G. moniliformis (Fusarium verticillioides anamorph) can switch from biotrophic to necrotrophic states, as the biotrophic state can encompass an endophytic condition.Many studies have reported the occurrence of G. moniliformis with an endophytic habit [58,59] and confirmed the biotechnological potential of endophytic strains of this species, including for biocontrol [60,61].The efficacy of BP10EF and BP335EF in controlling ramulosis can be explained by the synthesis of metabolites such as trioleoylglycerol (triolein), naphthoquinone (lawsone), and tricarballylic acid (Fumonisin A-C and P) [60,62].
The strains BP340EF (Aspergillus sp.) and BP335EF (G.moniliformis) showed similar behavior, forming one cluster.Endophytic Aspergillus species also produce active molecules associated with the biocontrol functional trait, such as butyrolactones, stigmasterol derivatives, and meroterpenoids e.g., [63,64].El-hawary et al. [65] reported that different Aspergillus species can produce secondary metabolites, including butenolides, alkaloids, terpenoids, cytochalasins, phenalenones, ρ-terphenyls, xanthones, steroids, diphenyl ether, and anthraquinone derivatives, with diverse biological activities, including antifungal and antibacterial effects.Verma et al. [66] indicated that the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using an endophytic strain of Aspergillus clavatus produces an efficient fungicidal compound for the control of Candida albicans, thus reaffirming the importance of species of this genus in biocontrol processes.
The potential of lesser-known fungi was also evaluated.The endophytic strain BP328EF (Codinaeopsis sp.) showed a relative inhibition of in vitro growth of C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides by 81.11%.The genus Codinaeopsis encompasses soil fungi capable of synthesizing polyketide codinaeopsin.This metabolite contains an unusual heterocyclic unit that binds indole and decalin fragments and exhibits antimalaria activity [67,68].Little is known about the effects of inoculating agronomically important plants with fungi of this genus.However, the Hamigera insecticola strain (BP33EF) showed potential as a growth promoter in cotton plants, considering its effect on the evaluated biometric characteristics.
Studies have confirmed the antifungal potential of species in this genus due to the synthesis of hamigerone and dihydrohamigerone metabolites [69] and silver nanoparticles produced from Hamigera terricola, which showed antifungal potential against phytopathogenic species [70].
Besides biocontrol processes and the induction of resistance, studies have confirmed that endophytic fungi can improve plant growth and development [71,72].Russo et al. [73] showed that species of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi can exhibit traits resulting in the promotion of soybean (Glycine max) growth, improving plant biometric development, and increasing grain yield under field conditions.Galeano et al. [74] indicated that the potential of Aspergillus species to promote plant growth should be considered.Hamayum et al. [75] showed that Aspergillus flavus can mitigate the effects of biotic stress from high temperatures on soybean and sunflower plants; they found significant quantities of indoleacetic acid (IAA), salicylic acid (SA), flavonoids, and phenolic compounds in cultures of this fungus; inoculated plants showed higher dry weight accumulation and chlorophyll contents and lower quantities of abscisic acid (ABA) and proline.This species can mitigate the effects of stress from high salt concentrations and high temperatures on soybean and sunflower plants by regulating endogenous hormones and the antioxidant system [76,77].Gibberellins produced by Aspergillus fumigatus significantly increased shoot length, fresh and dry weights, leaf area, chlorophyll contents, and photosynthetic rate of soybean plants under salt stress [78].Additionally, Saxena et al. [79] showed that Aspergillus niger can promote the growth of G. max through phosphate solubilization.In contrast to its saprophytic and pathogenic identity, the ability of filamentous Aspergillus fungi to solubilize insoluble phosphates, such as Ca, Fe, and Al phosphates, has stood out [80].Similarly, Radhakrishnan et al. [81] highlighted the potential of G. moniliformis to promote plant growth through phosphate solubilization.They showed that soybean plants inoculated with G. moniliformis and subjected to salt stress became more resistant, as this fungus solubilized large quantities of phosphates, reducing oxidative damage and ABA concentrations in leaves, and increasing salicylic acid contents.This explains the growth promotion effects found using the strain BP340EF, mainly in terms of shoot dry weight, stomatal index, carboxylation efficiency, and photochemical yield, as well as the strains BP10EF and BP335EF, mainly in terms of the activation of oxidative stress enzymes.
Fungal inoculation increased stomatal index and density on the adaxial surface of cotton leaves affected by ramulosis, resulting in increased net photosynthetic rate, transpiration, and stomatal conductance with greater carboxylation efficiency.This occurs because stomata serve as an innate immune barrier against infections [82].Thus, stomatal closure and decreased stomatal index and density are plant strategies to minimize pathogen infection e.g., [83].Decreases in stomatal density and/or size can significantly affect photosynthesis; thus, plants seem to have a compensation system involving the advantages of reducing gas exchange to prevent the penetration of pathogens [84].Therefore, as the seeds used in the present study were infected with C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides, control plants developed leaves with a low stomatal index and density to decrease the possibility of colonization of leaf tissues by C. gossypii or other pathogens, which could make the situation of a plant affected by ramulosis even more critical.

Endophytic Fungi Differentially Affect Growth, Gas Exchange, and Primary Photochemistry of Cotton Plants Affected by Ramulosis
These results enable discussions about specific functional traits expressed by different lines.Considering the widespread use of biological products to improve disease control and yield in agriculture, species of interest still need to be evaluated and utilized, considering their specific biological functionality, for a better understanding of the effect of mechanisms underlying microbial activity on the plant-microorganism interaction.For instance, the potential of the H. insecticola strain BP33EF to promote plant growth was evaluated in the present study.This strain, however, did not alleviate the primary photochemical stress induced by ramulosis in cotton leaves, showing similar ABS/RC and DI 0 /RC to those found in control plants.Consequently, photosynthetic performance (PI ABS ) was low in these plants.In such cases, compensation studies should be conducted to assess the actual yield gain when using growth-promoting strains that either trigger or do not mitigate metabolic stress processes.Promising results were found for the use of the Codinaeopsis sp.strain BP328EF to mitigate the effects of ramulosis in cotton plants.This genus is not reported in the literature as associated with phytopathogenic characteristics or pathogenicity in animals.Codinaeopsis (=Codinea) is a polyphyletic genus encompassing phialidic and dematiaceous hyphomycetes [85], known for their intriguing morphology and turbulent taxonomic history.Codinaea and its segregates thrive on decomposing plants, rarely occurring as endophytes or plant pathogens.Environmental DNA and ITS sequences indicate their common occurrence in bulk soils.These fungi evolved mainly in Eurasia and the Americas, with subsequent transitions to Africa and Australasia [86].Little is known about the effects of fungi in this genus on plant growth promotion and stress mitigation.However, the results found in the present study are confirmed by those found by Reis et al. [41], who not only evaluated the potential of Codinaeopsis sp. to promote plant growth but also its ability to improve nutrient absorption by G. max plants; plant responses regarding chlorophyll index, shoot dry weight, and nutrient concentration (N, P, and Mg) were similar to those of plants treated with a commercial product (Biomaphos ® , Bioma SA, Quartino, Switzerland) composed of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.Similarly, an endophytic strain of Codinaea sp.significantly affected the elongation of rooted cuttings from different cranberry cultivars [87].
Therefore, field tests should be conducted to assess the effects of applying Codinaeopsis sp. to inhibit ramulosis occurrence in cotton plantations.This study contributes new approaches, proposing a biological alternative to improve G. hirsutum plants and minimize yield losses due to colonization by C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides.Thus, mitigating damage caused by endophytic fungi in ramulosis-affected plants encourages the use of new sustainable management practices regarding phytopathogen control in cotton fields.However, the results presented in this study are expected to stimulate prospective studies of endophytic microorganisms in endemic plants of the Cerrado biome, opening prospects for new applications for biological control of pests and diseases in cotton and other important agricultural crops.

Conclusions
The hypothesis that inoculation of cotton plants with endophytic fungi can attenuate the physiological and photochemical damage caused by ramulosis was confirmed.Overall, endophytic fungi improved plant growth, stomatal index and density, net photosynthetic rate, and carboxylation efficiency while decreasing photochemical and oxidative stresses.Control plants developed leaves with a low adaxial stomatal index and density as a strategy to reduce the likelihood of colonization of leaf tissues by Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides due to the absence of fungal antagonism.The effects of relative inhibition of in vitro growth of C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides by the activity of the Codinaeopsis sp.strain BP328EF were explained as improvements in gas exchange parameters and reductions in chlorophyll-a photochemical stress and lipid peroxidation in cotton plants.This study aims to contribute to the development of biological alternatives for improving resistance in cotton (G.hirsutum) plants and minimizing yield losses caused by colonization by C. gossypii.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Procedures used to obtain Gossypium hirsutum plants with ramulosis symptoms and inoculated with endophytic fungal strains.Obtaining seeds colonized by Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides (a); isolation and identification of the phytopathogen (b,c); cultivation of endophytic fungal strains (d); exposure of Gossypium hirsutum seeds to endophytic fungi (e); obtaining seedlings (f); and selection of symptomatic seedlings for ramulosis (g).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Procedures used to obtain Gossypium hirsutum plants with ramulosis symptoms and inoculated with endophytic fungal strains.Obtaining seeds colonized by Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides (a); isolation and identification of the phytopathogen (b,c); cultivation of endophytic fungal strains (d); exposure of Gossypium hirsutum seeds to endophytic fungi (e); obtaining seedlings (f); and selection of symptomatic seedlings for ramulosis (g).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Compatibility between Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and the endophytic fungi: BP10EF: Gibberella moniliformis (a), BP33EF: Hamigera insecticola (b), BP328EF: Codinaeopsis sp.(c), BP335EF: Gibberella moniliformis (d), and BP340EF: Aspergillus sp.(e).Antibiosis of endophytic fungi to C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides in the paired colony test (a) and relative inhibition index (%) (f).In (a-e), the colonies on the left are the endophytic fungi, and those on the right are the phytopathogens.In (f), black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Compatibility between Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and the endophytic fungi: BP10EF: Gibberella moniliformis (a), BP33EF: Hamigera insecticola (b), BP328EF: Codinaeopsis sp.(c), BP335EF: Gibberella moniliformis (d), and BP340EF: Aspergillus sp.(e).Antibiosis of endophytic fungi to C. gossypii var.cephalosporioides in the paired colony test (a) and relative inhibition index (%) (f).In (a-e), the colonies on the left are the endophytic fungi, and those on the right are the phytopathogens.In (f), black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Microorganisms 2024 , 22 Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Growth of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Plant height (cm) (a); stem diameter (cm) (b); shoot fresh weight (g) (c); and shoot dry weight (g) (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Growth of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Plant height (cm) (a); stem diameter (cm) (b); shoot fresh weight (g) (c); and shoot dry weight (g) (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Stomatal parameters on the adaxial leaf surface and gas exchanges in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Stomatal index (%) (a); stomatal density (mm 2 ) (b); net photosynthetic rate: A (c); and transpiration rate: E (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 4 . 22 Figure 5 .
Figure 4. Stomatal parameters on the adaxial leaf surface and gas exchanges in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Stomatal index (%) (a); stomatal density (mm 2 ) (b); net photosynthetic rate: A (c); and transpiration rate: E (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).Microorganisms 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 22

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Gas exchange parameters in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Intercellular CO 2 concentration:

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Primary photochemistry by chlorophyll-a fluorescence in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Light absorption flux per active reaction center (ABS/RC) (a); electron transport flux per reaction center (ET0/RC) at t = 0 (b); trapped energy flux per reaction center (TR0/RC) at t = 0 (c); specific energy dissipation flux (DI0/RC) (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Primary photochemistry by chlorophyll-a fluorescence in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Light absorption flux per active reaction center (ABS/RC) (a); electron transport flux per reaction center (ET 0 /RC) at t = 0 (b); trapped energy flux per reaction center (TR 0 /RC) at t = 0 (c); specific energy dissipation flux (DI 0 /RC) (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.Primary photochemistry by chlorophyll-a fluorescence in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry: PHIP0 (a); quantum yield of energy dissipation: PHID0 (b); quantum yield of electron transport: PHIE0 (c); and photosynthetic performance index: PHIABS (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.Primary photochemistry by chlorophyll-a fluorescence in Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry: PHI P0 (a); quantum yield of energy dissipation: PHI D0 (b); quantum yield of electron transport: PHI E0 (c); and photosynthetic performance index: PHI ABS (d).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Activity of enzymes of oxidative metabolism in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Catalase: CAT (a); and peroxidase: POD (b).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Activity of enzymes of oxidative metabolism and lipid peroxidation in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Superoxide dismutase: SOD (a); ascorbate peroxidase: APX (b); and malondialdehyde: MDA (c).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical

Figure 8 . 22 Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Activity of enzymes of oxidative metabolism in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Catalase: CAT (a); and peroxidase: POD (b).horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Activity of enzymes of oxidative metabolism and lipid peroxidation in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Superoxide dismutase: SOD (a); ascorbate peroxidase: APX (b); and malondialdehyde: MDA (c).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Activity of enzymes of oxidative metabolism and lipid peroxidation in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum plants under attack of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides and inoculated with endophytic fungi.Superoxide dismutase: SOD (a); ascorbate peroxidase: APX (b); and malondialdehyde: MDA (c).Black horizontal bars within the boxplots represent the median.Vertical bars show the maximum and minimum values, and the points outside the box are outlier values.Equal letters above the boxes represent statistically equal means (Tukey's test, p < 0.05).

4. 3 .
The Codinaeopsis sp.Strain BP328EF Inhibits the In Vitro Growth of Colletotrichum gossypii var.cephalosporioides, Positively Affects Gas Exchange, and Reduces Chlorophyll-a Photochemical Stress and Lipid Peroxidation