Distribution of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Domestic Animals and Their Ticks in the Countries of the Mediterranean Basin between 2000 and 2021: A Systematic Review

Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) include a wide range of bacteria, parasites and viruses that cause a large spectrum of animal, human and zoonotic tick-borne diseases (TBDs). The object of this review was to establish an inventory and an analysis of TBPs found in domestic animals in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin. This geographic area occupies a central position between several continents and is an area of movement for animals, humans and pathogens of interest and their vectors, which is important in terms of animal and human health. In this systematic review, we included a total of 271 publications produced between 2000–2021 concerning TBPs in domestic animals. Among this literature, we found a total of 90 pathogen species (known as TBPs) reported in the 20 countries of the area; these were detected in tick species from domestic animals and were also directly detected in domestic animals. In all, 31 tick species were recorded and 12 domestic animal species, the latter comprising nine livestock and three pet species. More than 50% of the publications were from Western Europe. Island data were extracted and assessed, as islands of the Mediterranean Basin were represented in 16% of the publications and 77.8% of the TBPs reported. Our results show the importance of islands in the monitoring of TBPs, despite the low percentage of publications.


Introduction
Pathogens are one of the largest threats to health worldwide. They can be divided into four main groups: bacteria, parasites, viruses and fungi. These groups are present on all the continents and in the oceans, and target all types of plants and animals as well as humans, depending on their tropism and life cycle [1]. These pathogens have different transmission strategies: (i) direct contact between individuals from the same species or between individuals from different species; (ii) indirect contact through the environment or dissemination in the air; and (iii) through vectors such as hematophagous arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks or sandflies that can transmits pathogens via blood-sucking from one host to another [2,3].
Among the different pathogens, many are zoonotic and are transmitted between animals and humans, while others are non-zoonotic and specifically target either humans or animals. Zoonotic pathogens account for about 60% of pathogens worldwide and are particularly present in emerging diseases [4]. Transmission of these pathogens by hematophagous insects has become one of the main threats to global health in recent decades [4].
Hematophagous arthropod vectors can transmit pathogens called vector-borne pathogens (VBPs), which may be zoonotic or non-zoonotic, from one individual to another. They can transmit bacteria, parasites and viruses [5]. For example, the role of ticks in the circulation of Lyme disease between animal and human populations in North America has

Materials and Methods
We undertook a literature review concerning tick-borne pathogens in all countries of the Mediterranean Basin (n = 20). We followed PRISMA guidelines and used explicit and systematic methods to identify, select and evaluate the studies relevant to the topic [20]. We compiled and evaluated the data from the studies included in this review.
All articles published in English in international journals indexed by PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were considered ( Figure 1). The date range was from 1 January 2000 through 31 February 2021. We used keywords for each country of the Mediterranean Basin, classified in alphabetical order: Albania OR Algeria OR Bosnia-Herzegovina OR Cyprus OR Croatia OR Egypt OR France OR Greece OR Israel OR Italy OR Libya OR Malta OR Monaco OR Montenegro OR Morocco OR Palestine OR Slovenia OR Spain OR Tunisia OR Turkey AND Pathogens AND Ticks, with the option "all fields" to recover articles in which search items appeared in the title, abstract and keywords. First, all papers considered to be "grey" literature, such as literature reviews, case studies, manuscripts and abstracts of posters from conferences and guides from relevant organizations, were excluded. We also discarded clinical descriptions of disease and diagnosis in humans and animals. We selected all papers focusing on the distribution and circulation of tick-borne pathogens and their vectors. We focused on studies dealing with the distribution of these pathogens and ticks in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin and their islands. Second, we excluded duplicate and inaccessible articles (due to language or unavailable full text). We reviewed the titles and abstracts and applied inclusion/exclusion criteria on 1070 articles. Filtering was carried out by responding to the following questions: 1.
Did the study include a country with a Mediterranean coast: Yes/No 2.
Did the study include tick-borne pathogens: Yes/No 3.
Did the study exclude ticks collected in vegetation: Yes/No Only publications considering TBPs in domestic animals and/or TBPs in engorged ticks collected on domestic animals in Mediterranean countries were included. This made it possible to conduct an overview of research about TBPs potentially infesting and circulating in the domestic animal population only. The articles were saved if the answers to the three questions were "yes"; otherwise they were eliminated. For the next step, we reviewed the full-text and entered the information of interest into a database for 299 articles. We also excluded articles that we found did not fit the criteria after reading the full text.
We reviewed the bibliography of each selected article in order to check for new articles to include in the review and relevant articles in the field of research. We followed the same steps as previously described for new articles (n = 81). Only publications considering TBPs in domestic animals and/or TBPs in engorged ticks collected on domestic animals in Mediterranean countries were included. This made it possible to conduct an overview of research about TBPs potentially infesting and circulating in the domestic animal population only. The articles were saved if the answers to the three questions were "yes"; otherwise they were eliminated. For the next step, we reviewed the full-text and entered the information of interest into a database for 299 articles. We also excluded articles that we found did not fit the criteria after reading the full text.
We reviewed the bibliography of each selected article in order to check for new articles to include in the review and relevant articles in the field of research. We followed the same steps as previously described for new articles (n = 81).
For the last step, we excluded articles dealing with wild animals (n = 109) and retained only articles dealing with domestic animals (n = 271). The selection steps are summarized in Figure 1, with an explanation of the inclusion/exclusion of articles for this review.
The data of interest were captured in an Excel table that was tested in advance with 15 articles, and included the following information: 1. Main characteristics of the studies: article ID, years, authors, analytical and statistical methodology For the last step, we excluded articles dealing with wild animals (n = 109) and retained only articles dealing with domestic animals (n = 271). The selection steps are summarized in Figure 1, with an explanation of the inclusion/exclusion of articles for this review.
The data of interest were captured in an Excel table that was tested in advance with 15 articles, and included the following information: 1.
Main characteristics of the studies: article ID, years, authors, analytical and statistical methodology 2.
Pathogen-related information: pathogens screened and detected, species, number of species, zoonotic status, host 3.
Area of interest: country, type of area, number of sampling sites The different outputs of the data worksheet were selected following mutual agreement from all the authors.
The distribution of the publications through the years is shown in Figure 2. During the first decade, the number of papers increased slightly until 2008, with a maximum of 20 publications, and decreased in the years 2009 and 2010 (11 and nine papers, respectively). During the second decade, there was first a low rate of publication, except in 2012, with a peak of 21 publications. Between 2014 and 2021, the mean number of published papers per year was approximatively 20, accounting for 60% of the published papers about tick-borne pathogens on domestic animals, with a peak of 37 papers in 2017. In 2021, the number of papers was low because we stopped the research in February 2021. The rate of publication of research on tick-borne pathogens increased notably during this period. This trend can be explained by different factors: First, there is increased interest from the scientific community due to the importance of this subject in terms of human and animal health.
Second, there is improved accessibility of scientific journals and publications. Third, there have been changes in pathogen detection methodology through the years, and particularly developments in the field of molecular biology. This trend can be explained by different factors: First, there is increased interest from the scientific community due to the importance of this subject in terms of human and animal health.
Second, there is improved accessibility of scientific journals and publications. Third, there have been changes in pathogen detection methodology through the years, and particularly developments in the field of molecular biology.
Concerning this last point, tick-borne pathogens were typically detected using three kinds of methods ( Figure 2). The first category of method was serological analysis, involving detection of pathogens in blood and tissue samples by way of antibodies; such methods include ELISA and immunofluorescence. The second category was the microscopy approach, which is more common for parasites. The third category was molecular biology, which covered techniques involving the detection of pathogen nucleic acids in both tick and animal hosts, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and high-throughput sequencing techniques. Even though researchers may use more than one approach to detect and monitor TBPs, we observed that over the years, molecular biology rapidly became the main analytical approach. The increase in publications over the Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1236 6 of 40 last ten years seems to be linked to the development and accessibility of molecular biology techniques, and to their ability to simultaneously detect a large number of pathogens.
In addition to changes in the amount of data available depending on the year, we can also note variability of these data according to their geographic origin. In total, 271 publications and 20 countries of the Mediterranean Basin were considered in this review. The mean number of publications per country was about 13, and the number of publications varied from 0 to 76, depending on the country (Figure 3). ods include ELISA and immunofluorescence. The second category was the microscopy approach, which is more common for parasites. The third category was molecular biology, which covered techniques involving the detection of pathogen nucleic acids in both tick and animal hosts, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and high-throughput sequencing techniques. Even though researchers may use more than one approach to detect and monitor TBPs, we observed that over the years, molecular biology rapidly became the main analytical approach. The increase in publications over the last ten years seems to be linked to the development and accessibility of molecular biology techniques, and to their ability to simultaneously detect a large number of pathogens.
In addition to changes in the amount of data available depending on the year, we can also note variability of these data according to their geographic origin. In total, 271 publications and 20 countries of the Mediterranean Basin were considered in this review. The mean number of publications per country was about 13, and the number of publications varied from 0 to 76, depending on the country (Figure 3).

Tick-Borne Pathogens in Countries of the Mediterranean Basin
A total of 271 publications were analyzed: 56.5% were about bacteria, 37.7% were about parasites and 5.80% were about viruses. A total of 90 pathogens from 18 genera were detected in domestic animals and their ticks from the Mediterranean Basin: 11 genera of bacteria, four genera of parasites, and three genera of viruses (Table 1). Among these 90 TBPs, 60% were zoonotic and 40% were non-zoonotic or of unknown status (Table 1). Among the 90 TBPs detected, 73.3% were found in ticks and 76.7% were found in animal hosts. Of the TBPs reported, 50% were detected in both (51.1%).

Tick-Borne Pathogens in Countries of the Mediterranean Basin
A total of 271 publications were analyzed: 56.5% were about bacteria, 37.7% were about parasites and 5.80% were about viruses. A total of 90 pathogens from 18 genera were detected in domestic animals and their ticks from the Mediterranean Basin: 11 genera of bacteria, four genera of parasites, and three genera of viruses (Table 1). Among these 90 TBPs, 60% were zoonotic and 40% were non-zoonotic or of unknown status (Table 1). Among the 90 TBPs detected, 73.3% were found in ticks and 76.7% were found in animal hosts. Of the TBPs reported, 50% were detected in both (51.1%).  [189,190,194,197,[199][200][201] Rickettsia  [189,192,193,195,200,209 [119,190,195,212]

Parasites Nematoda
Cercopithifilaria Pathogens in the genus Cercopithifilaria are microfilariae parasites that mainly infect wild and domestic animals. Among the three species Cercopithifilaria grassii, Cercopithifilaria spp. sensu and Cercopithifilaria bainae, only the latter was reported in our research [236]. It was detected in two countries: Greece, with a prevalence of 7% from Rh. sanguineus s.l. collected from dogs; and Italy, at 25.86% from dogs [22,23]. This parasite was found in both ticks and animals, but from two distinct publications. The genus was found in only 0.7% of the publications and 1.9% of the publications concerning parasites.

Babesia
Babesia is a genus of erythrocytic protozoal parasites transmitted by ticks that cause babesiosis in both animals and humans. The main Babesia species transmitted by ticks are B. divergens, B. duncani, B. microti, B. venatorum. B. vogeli and B. canis (responsible for canine babesiosis). Babesia vogeli was the species found in the largest range of countries among the 15 Babesia species found in domestic animals. Babesia vogeli was found in seven countries (Croatia, Cyprus, France, Italy, Palestine, Spain and Turkey) and was not detected in countries of North Africa. Among these seven countries, the highest prevalence of B. vogeli in animals was 14% from dogs in Italy and 10.5% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. ticks collected from dogs in France [56,59]. The next most commonly found species were B. canis and B. ovis. Babesia canis was found in five countries (Croatia, France, Italy, Spain and Turkey). The highest prevalence was 71.4% from dogs in Italy along with 5.65% from Rh. sanguineus s.l. and Dermacentor reticulatus from dogs in France. Babesia ovis was found in five countries (Algeria, Italy, Palestine, Spain and Turkey). The genus Babesia is one of the most frequently screened or found pathogens, along with Rickettsia and Anaplasma, featuring in 17.7% of the publications. It was the most commonly screened or found of the parasites, featuring in 46.2% of the publications concerning parasites. It showed the highest species diversity, just after the genus Rickettsia.
Hepatozoon Parasites in the genus Hepatozoon are intracellular protozoa belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa that infect amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles [237]. Two species were found in domestic animals from countries on the Mediterranean Rim. Hepatozoon canis was found in cats or dogs in eight countries (Croatia, Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy, Palestine, Spain and Turkey). The highest prevalence was 22.3% in dogs along with 20.58% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. from dogs, both occurring in Turkey [80,238]. The second species was Hepatozoon felis, with the highest prevalence found to be 5.1% from cats in Italy and 1.7% from Rh. sanguineus s.l. from dogs in Turkey [75,80]. The genus Hepatozoon was the third most commonly found or screened parasite, featuring in a total of 7% of the overall publications and 18.2% of the publications concerning parasites. Pathogens in the genus Hepatozoon were found only in two pet hosts (cats and dogs).
Theileria Along with Babesia and Hepatozoon, the genus Theileria belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa, and with Babesia, also to the piroplasmids group. Species in this genus infect mammals and have an obligatory cycle in ticks. They cause benign to fatal theileriosis in breeding animals [239]. A total of 11 species were found in domestic animals from the Mediterranean Basin: T. annae, T. annulata, T. buffeli, T. cervi, T. equi, T. lestoquardi, T. luwenshuni, T. orientalis, T. ovis, T. uilenberg and T. sergenti. The species found in the most countries were T. ovis, T. annulata and T. buffeli. T. ovis was found in six countries (Algeria, France, Greece, Palestine, Spain, and Turkey), as was T. annulata (Algeria, Egypt, Italy, Spain, Tunisia and Turkey), while T. buffeli was found in five countries (Algeria, France, Italy, Spain, and Turkey). The highest prevalence of T. ovis was 53.3% in goats and sheep from Algeria, along with 37.35% in ticks from the genus Rhipicephalus taken from goats and sheep in Algeria [44,66]. T. annulata was found in 64% of cattle from Turkey and in 5% of Rh. (Bo.) annulatus collected from cattle, goats and sheep from Algeria [44,92]. The highest prevalence of T. buffeli was 11.56% from cattle in Turkey along with 2.8% in three tick species, I. hexagonus, I. ricinus and Rh. sanguineus s.l., from cattle in Italy [60,240]. Similarly to Babesia, the genus Theileria has widespread distribution in a large number of countries. It was found in 17.3% of the overall publications and 45.2% of the publications concerning parasites.

Bacteria Anaplasma
The genus Anaplasma includes intracellular Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the family Anaplasmataceae from the Rickettsiales order. Most of these bacteria are zoonotic and have a high impact on veterinary health; for instance, Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma bovis and Anaplasma ovis; and also on human health; for instance, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys [241,242]. The most common species is A. platys, responsible for canine cyclic thrombocytopenia, which was found in 11 countries out of 20 in the Mediterranean Basin (Algeria, Croatia, Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Italy, Morocco, Palestine, Spain, Tunisia and Turkey). Six different tick species were found to be positive and to transmit this pathogen, with Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. as the main tick species, and with the highest prevalence in Morocco at 6.25%. The most common host was the dog, with a prevalence of 40.8% and 33% positive blood samples in Italy [72,113,148]. The second most common species is A. phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, found in 10 countries (Algeria, Croatia, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Morocco, Spain, Tunisia and Turkey). Out of six tick species found to be positive for this bacterium, Rh. sanguineus s.l. was the main tick species, especially on dogs. The highest prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in Rh. sanguineus s.l. was 13.7% in Egypt. The main pathogen host was cattle, with a prevalence of 40.6% in blood samples in Algeria [104,130].
As seen above, the Anaplasma genus is both highly represented in the Mediterranean Basin and also highly screened, with detection in more than 25.8% of the publications analyzed and in 44.9% of the publications concerning bacteria. This can be explained by the number of countries (12) and hosts affected (11), and shows the public health and veterinary importance of this genus in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin, especially for the two zoonotic species A. phagocytophilum and A. platys.

Bartonella
Bartonella are Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the family Bartonellaceae from the Rhizobiales order, and half of them are known to be zoonotic. They are responsible for diseases such as trench fever and cat-scratch disease, and frequently cause endocarditis [243]. The most commonly detected species in domestic animals is Bartonella henselae, responsible for cat-scratch disease, detected in five countries (Algeria, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, and Spain). Bartonella henselae were mainly found in Ixodes ricinus, with the highest prevalence in Italy at 5.4% [154]. The ticks reported positive were mainly collected on cats. The host reported with the highest prevalence was the cat, with 83.5% in Italy [151]. The other four Bartonella species detected were observed in only one or two countries, mainly Italy and Spain.
The Bartonella genus is less often screened for and less often found than the previous genus, featuring in only 7.7% of the publications and 13.5% of the publications concerning bacteria. It is mainly screened for in pets (cats and dogs). This genus is mainly transmitted by biting flies and by fleas; however, it is evident that ticks can also be involved [244]. This shows both unequal presence and unequal screening for the Bartonella genus in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin. Veterinary interest in the genus focuses on pets.

Borrelia
The Borrelia genus includes spirochetes bacteria belonging to the family Spirochaetaceae. It is divided into two groups: the Lyme borreliosis group responsible for Lyme disease, which is mainly caused by bacteria of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group, and the relapsing fever group, which includes Borrelia miyamotoi [245]. The main species found in our study were from the B. burgdorferi sensu lato group, with the highest prevalence in animal hosts at 1.47% in dogs from Italy; and in ticks at 53% and 26% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. and Rh. annulatus, respectively, from cattle in Italy. Concerning B. afzeeli, B. garinii and B. valaisiana, the highest occurrence rates in ticks were 4.3%, 4.3% and 6.4%, respectively, from Ixodes ricinus collected from dogs in Spain [51,53,60,127]. The last species detected in the Mediterranean Basin from domestic animals was Borrelia theileri, which is a relapsing fever bacterium responsible for bovine borreliosis [246]. It was detected in goats and sheep with 10.8% and 5.8% prevalence, respectively in Algeria [66].
Borrelia found in domestic animals from the Mediterranean Basin were mainly from the Lyme Borreliosis group, except for Bo. theileri. They were detected in only 4.1% of the publications analyzed and in 7.1% of the publications concerning bacteria. Among these publications, they were more commonly found in ticks (72.7%) than in animal hosts (27.8%). On the basis of these results, research seems to be more focused on the possible circulation of infested ticks than on the potential role of domestic animals as reservoirs of the pathogen. Borrelia is either poorly screened or not common in domestic animals from countries of the Mediterranean Basin.

Chlamydia/Chlamydophila
The genera Chlamydia and Chlamydophila belong to the Chlamydiales, which are Gramnegative bacteria responsible for a wide range of diseases throughout almost the entire animal realm [160]. Recently, a few studies carried out in Italy showed that ticks could be vectors of Chlamydia/Chlamydophila [154,160]. Two bacterial species have been found. The first is Chlamydia abortus, from the genus Chlamydia, with the highest prevalence at 40.5% in Ixodes ricinus from cats in Italy. The second, belonging to the genus Chlamydophila, is Chlamydia psittaci, with the highest prevalence at 4.4% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. from dogs and breeding animals in Italy. No bacteria were found in animal hosts. The Chlamydia genus was found in 0.7% of the overall publications and in 1.3% of the publications concerning bacteria. This shows a possible role of ticks in the circulation of Chlamydia species; however, transmission and circulation in the domestic animal population in the countries of the Mediterranean Rim cannot be confirmed.

Coxiella
Only one pathogen is representative of this genus: Coxiella burnetii, responsible for Q fever, which is transmitted by ticks and affects both humans and animals. This disease has a worldwide distribution and can cause febrile illness, endocarditis, meningoencephalitis or pneumonia in humans, while it is mainly asymptomatic in animals apart from sporadic cases of abortion in pregnant animals [247]. It has been found in nine countries of the Mediterranean Basin (Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Italy, Montenegro, Slovenia, Spain and Tunisia), with the highest prevalence in animals at 71.2% from camels in Algeria and 10.2% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. from goats and sheep in Cyprus [163,177]. This genus was found in 8.9% of the publications and in 15.4% of the publications concerning bacteria. For C. burnetii, most of the publications investigated the ticks as well as their hosts, indicating a level of public health and veterinary interest.

Ehrlichia
Ehrlichia spp. is a genus closely related to Anaplasma spp., and is responsible for human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia canis) and for canine ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis) [248]. The main species in domestic animals from the Mediterranean Basin is Ehrlichia canis, which is responsible for disease in both humans and dogs. It has been detected in 10 countries (Algeria, Croatia, Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Palestine, Spain, and Turkey) and its highest prevalence was found at 48.5% in dogs from Italy and 6.6% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. collected from dogs in Turkey [123,206].
The other four species found in our review, E. equi, E. ewingii, E. minacensis and Candidatus E. urmitei, have a minor health impact and were each found in only one country. The Ehrlichia genus was the third most common bacterial genus found or screened for after Anaplasma and Rickettsia, featuring in 11.8% of the overall publications and 20.5% of the publications concerning bacteria. Among the publications dealing with the Ehrlichia genus, 93.5% concerned E. canis.

Neoehrlichia
Of the four bacteria in this genus, only one is a human pathogen: Neoehrlichia mikurensis, which causes chronic lymphocytic leukemia, for example. Its vectors are from the Ixodes genus, and rodents are the most well-known hosts [249]. In domestic animals, it has been detected only in Spain with 1% prevalence in I. ricinus from cattle [136]. This species was rarely found or poorly screened for, featuring in only 0.4% of the publications and 0.6% of the publications concerning bacteria.

Francisella
Bacteria from the genus Francisella are Gram-negative bacteria with one important species, Francisella tularensis, responsible for tularemia in humans and animals [250]. In the domestic animals of the Mediterranean Basin, only the genus Francisella spp. level was identified. It was found only in Italy, with a prevalence of 66%, 21% and 8% in Hyalomma marginatum, Rh. bursa and Rh. (Boophilus) annulatus from cattle, respectively. As with the Neoehrlichia genus, no Francisella was detected directly in animal hosts [149].

Leptospira
The genus Leptospira includes spirochetes and zoonotic bacteria that are responsible for leptospirosis worldwide. The first case was documented over 100 years ago. The bacteria are usually transmitted by direct or indirect contact with a contaminated element, but can also be found in ticks [251,252]. Again, only the genus Leptospira spp. was detected. It was found in Egypt with a prevalence of 50%, 41%, 40% and 29% from camel, sheep, cattle and buffalo, respectively [184]. Unlike the two previous genera, Leptospira spp. was only found in domestic animals and not in ticks. However, similarly to the two previous genera, it was found in 0.4% of the overall publications and in 0.6% of publications concerning bacteria. Nevertheless, the Leptospira genus has already been found in ticks in Europe [252], but this was not found to be reported in the present review.

Mycoplasma
The genus Mycoplasma is composed of commensal and pathogenic bacteria that can cause anemia in a wide range of mammals [253][254][255]. Mycoplasma haemocanis, My. haemofelis, Candidatus My. haemonutum, Candidatus My. haematoparvum and Candidatus My. turicensis were found, but only My. heamocanis and Candidatus My. haematoparvum were found in two countries (Greece and Turkey). The prevalence of My. haemocanis was 5.6% in dogs from Greece and 26.2% in dogs from Turkey. For Candidatus My. haematoparvum, the prevalence was 4.2% from dogs in Greece and 6.7% from dogs in Turkey [185,186]. The other three species were each found in only one country. As with the Leptospira genus, the Mycoplasma genus was found only in animals in this review. It was found in 2.2% of the publications and in 1.3% of the publications concerning bacteria.

Rickettsia
The genus Rickettsia is one of the most important tick-borne pathogen genera. It is divided into two groups: the spotted fever group (SFG), including Rickettsia conorii, causative agent of Mediterranean spotted fever, and the typhus group (TG), which is less well-known and includes, for example, Rickettsia typhi [256,257]. Seventeen species were detected in domestic animals in this study. Sixteen of these were from the SFG (R. aeschlimannii, R. africae, R. conorii, R. conorii israelensis, R. felis, R. helvetica, R. hoogstraalii, R. massiliae, R. monacensis, R. raoultii, R. rickettsia, R. rhipicephali, R. sibirica mongolotimonae, R. slovaca, Candidatus R. barbariae and Candidatus R. goldwasserii), and one was from the TG: R. typhi. Of these Rickettsia spp., Rickettsia massiliae (SFG group) was the most widespread bacterium and was detected in 10 countries (Algeria, Cyprus, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Lebanon, Palestine, Spain and Tunisia). Its highest prevalence was 40.4% in Rh. sanguineus s.l. collected from cattle, dogs and sheep from Algeria, and 2.7% from camel blood in Tunisia [175,213]. The second most common bacterium was R. africae (SFG group), found in eight countries (Egypt, France, Israel, Italy, Lebanon, Palestine, Tunisia and Turkey), with the highest prevalence at 26.7% in Hyalomma impeltatum collected from cattle and camels in Egypt, and 0.3% in camel blood from Tunisia [194,201]. Rickettsia typhi was the only bacterium from the TG group, detected with a prevalence of 29.7% from cats in Greece [155]. On the Mediterranean Rim, the genus Rickettsia is widespread and diversified in domestic animals and their ticks, and is widely screened; it was found in 25.3% of the publications overall, and in 44.2% of the publications concerning bacteria. This genus is the second most commonly studied after Anaplasma spp. However, the SFG group (98.6% of the publications) was of the greatest scientific interest compared to the TG group (1.4% of the publications).

Viruses Capripoxvirus
This genus includes species that affect a broad range of domestic ruminants and that have a considerable economic impact, especially in Africa and the Middle East. It covers three species: lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV), goatpox virus (GTPV) and sheeppox virus (SPV) [258]. Among these three species, only LSDV was found in ticks from domestic animals in this review. It was found in ticks from the genera Amblyomma, Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus from cattle in Egypt, with a prevalence of 65.5% [224]. It was the least commonly found virus (0.4% of the overall publications and 7.2% of the publications concerning viruses). This genus does not represent a major threat in veterinary health in the countries of the Mediterranean Rim. Nonetheless, it should still be considered a potential threat, considering the range of ticks in which it has been found.

Flavivirus
The flaviviruses are an important part of the arboviruses. They are transmitted by both mosquitoes and ticks. They mainly infect mammals and account for a large proportion of the recent outbreaks of public health and veterinary concern in terms of morbidity and mortality [259]. The most well-known tick-borne flavivirus, tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), was found in two countries in domestic animals: in Greece, with a prevalence of 1.4% from I. ricinus ticks from goats, and in Italy, with a prevalence of 16.43% in goats [224,225]. TBEV was the second most common virus species, found in a total of 0.7% of publications and 14.3% of the publications concerning viruses.

Orthonairovirus
Globally, this genus is mainly represented by one species: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV). This virus is transmitted by ticks, mainly from the genus Hyalomma, causes severe or even fatal human disease across almost all of the Old World, and its range has expanded with climate change [260]. In domestic animals from countries of the Mediterranean Basin, the virus has been found in five different countries (Albania, Greece, Egypt, Spain, and Turkey). The highest rates of occurrence were 90% from sheep in Albania and 6.88% from three tick genera (Hyalomma spp., Rhipicephalus spp. and Ixodes spp.) collected from buffalo, cattle, goats and sheep in Turkey [226,230]. CCHFV was the most commonly screened or found virus, featuring in about 78.5% of the publications concerning viruses and in 4.1% of the overall publications. In order to determine the expansion of the virus, numerous research studies have been performed on the tick species that are potential vectors of the virus.

Ticks Positive for Tick-Borne Pathogens from Domestic Animals in the Mediterranean Basin
In all, 35 tick species from seven genera found on domestic animals in the Mediterranean Basin were positive for TBPs. Out of the seven genera, six belonged to the hard ticks (Ixodidae): Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus. These genera are widely distributed in this region. The last genus, which was collected in Algeria and Egypt, represents the soft ticks (Argasidae): Argas (Table S1). The diversity of tick species positive for TBPs varies between these genera (Figure 4).
Greece, Egypt, Spain, and Turkey). The highest rates of occurrence were 90% from sheep in Albania and 6.88% from three tick genera (Hyalomma spp., Rhipicephalus spp. and Ixodes spp.) collected from buffalo, cattle, goats and sheep in Turkey [226,230]. CCHFV was the most commonly screened or found virus, featuring in about 78.5% of the publications concerning viruses and in 4.1% of the overall publications. In order to determine the expansion of the virus, numerous research studies have been performed on the tick species that are potential vectors of the virus.

Ticks Positive for Tick-Borne Pathogens from Domestic Animals in the Mediterranean Basin
In all, 35 tick species from seven genera found on domestic animals in the Mediterranean Basin were positive for TBPs. Out of the seven genera, six belonged to the hard ticks (Ixodidae): Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus. These genera are widely distributed in this region. The last genus, which was collected in Algeria and Egypt, represents the soft ticks (Argasidae): Argas (Table S1). The diversity of tick species positive for TBPs varies between these genera (Figure 4).

Ixodidae Genus Rhipicephalus
The top-ranking genus in terms of TBP diversity detected in the Mediterranean Basin was the genus Rhipicephalus (Table S1). It has a worldwide distribution and is very broadly present in the Mediterranean Basin, where it can target a large range of wild and domestic animals [261,262]. This genus transmits pathogens that cause diseases with global health impacts, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis and rickettsiosis [261,263]. However, only six species were identified for the detection of 57 pathogenic species in a total of 13 countries: Rh (Bo.). annulatus, Rh. appendiculatus, Rh. bursa, Rh (Bo.). microplus, Rh. pusillus and Rh. sanguineus s.l.. Out of these 57 TBP species, 47 were detected in Rh. sanguineus s.l., which was the tick species with the highest number of pathogenic species found in our review (Figure 4). It is a tick species known for the transmission of a number

Ixodidae Genus Rhipicephalus
The top-ranking genus in terms of TBP diversity detected in the Mediterranean Basin was the genus Rhipicephalus (Table S1). It has a worldwide distribution and is very broadly present in the Mediterranean Basin, where it can target a large range of wild and domestic animals [261,262]. This genus transmits pathogens that cause diseases with global health impacts, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis and rickettsiosis [261,263]. However, only six species were identified for the detection of 57 pathogenic species in a total of 13 countries: Rh (Bo.). annulatus, Rh. appendiculatus, Rh. bursa, Rh (Bo.). microplus, Rh. pusillus and Rh. sanguineus s.l. Out of these 57 TBP species, 47 were detected in Rh. sanguineus s.l., which was the tick species with the highest number of pathogenic species found in our review (Figure 4). It is a tick species known for the transmission of a number of TBPs, such as E. canis, R. conorii and B. canis, f-ound in our review. This tick species is highly present in domestic animals and has a tropism for pets, such as dogs, as well as livestock, such as cattle [261]. This tropism and the TBPs transmitted by this species could be the reasons underlying both the scientific interest in this species and the number of TBPs found in domestic animals.

Genus Ixodes
The second-ranking genus in terms of pathogen diversity was the genus Ixodes (Table S1). This genus is mainly known for the transmission of Lyme disease. The ticks are present mainly in Europe, where due to their pleiotropic feeding, they are responsible for the spread of numerous TBPs [262]. They target a broad range of hosts (ubiquity) and have a high impact on human and animal health [261,263]. Only three species were detected in countries of the Mediterranean Basin: I. hexagonus, I. ricinus and I. ventalloi. A total of 36 pathogens were found on six animal hosts. This genus has the highest number of pathogens detected for the lowest number of tick species, with a total of 36 pathogen species for just three tick species: I. hexagonus, I. ricinus and I. ventalloi. The main species is I. ricinus, in which 34 TBPs were found out of the 36 found in the genus (Figure 4). This species is ubiquitous and can be found on mammals, reptiles and avifauna. Ixodes ricinus is mainly known for the transmission of B. burgdorferi s.l., the causative agent of Lyme disease. However, as shown in our review, it can be positive for a wide range of pathogens. This could be due to the large array of hosts on which this species can feed.

Genus Hyalomma
The genus Hyalomma ranks third in terms of TBPs detected. It is known for the transmission of CCHFV and of bacteria such as Rickettsiae. The ticks are large in size (5-6 mm) with tropism for large mammals upon reaching their adult forms, and for small mammals and birds while in their immature stages. Hyalomma species are mainly distributed in the southern part of the Mediterranean Basin, with a slow increase in range in Western Europe and the Balkans [261,263]. In the Mediterranean Basin, a total of 11 species were found, which is the highest number of species among all the tick genera. They were found on nine hosts in 12 countries and were found to be infected by a total of 25 TBPs (Table S1). The number of hosts, countries and pathogens associated with this genus indicates its public health importance and the considerable threat it poses. Among the 11 species of the genus Hyalomma, the species found positive for the largest number of TBPs was Hy. marginatum ( Figure 4). Out of 25 species found in the genus, a total of 16 TBPs were found. Concerning domestic animals, Hy. marginatum affects a large range of livestock and can be responsible for TBDs of veterinary importance, such as infections with Rickettsia spp., CCHFV, Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. These characteristics, along with the tropism of the immature-stage ticks for birds, could underpin the public health importance of this species.

Genus Haemaphysalis
The genus Haemaphysalis is the fourth most common genus in terms of pathogens detected (Table S1). The ticks are small in size and target mammals upon reaching their adult stage, and a wide array of hosts when still in their immature stages. They are known to have veterinary importance in livestock and are present in Asia [263]. On domestic animals from the Mediterranean Basin, the genus Haemaphysalis was detected in seven different countries, and ticks were positive for 16 TBPs. Five different species were found: H. adleris, H. concinna, H. parva, H. punctata and H. sulcata. Among these, the species found to be positive for the highest number of TBPs was H. parva (Figure 4). This species is mainly distributed in the Mediterranean Basin, with key tropism for domestic ungulates when the ticks are in the adult stage. It can transmit a wide range of TBPs, such as Rickettsia spp., C. burnetii and F. tularensis [264]. Unlike the genus Hyalomma, the pathogen distribution in the different species of Haemaphysalis is more uniform, especially between H. parva, H. punctata and H. sulcata. This could explain the overall interest in the genus Haemaphysalis on domestic animals across the countries of the Mediterranean Basin.

Genus Dermacentor
The genus Dermacentor ranked fifth in terms of TBPs detected (Table S1). Similarly to the genus Ixodes, it is mainly present in Europe, where it transmits a broad range of TBPs [261,262]. The genus is represented by two common species in the Mediterranean Basin: D. marginatus and D. reticulatus. They transmit a wide array of pathogens, including Rickettsia spp. and Babesia spp., which are of veterinary and human health importance. All the development stages were found in six different domestic animals from eight different countries. Twelve pathogen species have been identified in the two tick species. The main species was D. marginatus, which was found to be positive for 9 TBPs (Figure 4). This species is known for its tropism on wild and domestic ungulates, but also for transmission of B. canis and R. slovaca [261].

Genus Amblyomma
The genus Amblyomma was the last-ranking genus of hard ticks in terms of TBPs detected (Table S1). It can be found in nearly all terrestrial animals and occurs mainly in the tropical and sub-tropical areas of Asia, Africa and Oceania [265]. Recently, it appeared in the Mediterranean Basin, for instance in Corsica [199,266]. Due to the geographical distribution of this genus, it was rarely found in the Mediterranean Basin and only two species (A. hebreaum and A. variegatum) have been identified. Positive ticks were only found on cattle. The virus and bacteria detected were lumpy skin disease virus and Rickettsia africae (Table 2, Figure 4).

Argasidae
Among the soft ticks, only one species was found: Argas persicus. This species is mainly found on domestic birds. It is mainly found in the Mediterranean Basin but is primarily involved in the transmission of bird-related pathogens [261,263,267]. In our review, it was found on two hosts, and three pathogen species were found (Table S1, Figure 4). This genus is one of the less commonly collected ticks in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin, along with the genus Amblyomma of the hard ticks group.

Domestic Animal Hosts of Both Positive Ticks and TBPs in the Countries of the Mediterranean Basin
All the information in this part brings together data about domestic animals infested by TBPs and about domestic animal hosts of positive engorged ticks. However, the data about positive engorged ticks do not confirm the vector character of the ticks for the different TBPs. The domestic animals from countries of the Mediterranean Basin identified in this review can be divided into two groups: livestock animals and pets.
Livestock was composed of nine species (Table 2), which were reasonably well studied in the literature under review. It appears that cattle, sheep and goats were studied in more than 13 countries and were the subject of the highest number of studies. This can be explained by the wide range of tick-borne pathogen genera targeting these species (Table 2), and the economic importance of livestock in the countries of this region [268]. Among the 90 TBPs identified in this review, about 59% were found in positive ticks from cattle, with more than 40% found directly on the animal. On the other hand, some species (buffalo, chickens, donkeys and pigs) were well studied, and available data were found in only one or two countries. The number of TBPs detected in these animals or in their ticks is much lower ( Table 2).
The pet group was composed of only three species: cats, dogs and rabbits. Among these three species, the dog was clearly the more commonly studied pet. Available data about the detection of TBPs in dogs (77 studies) and their ticks (63 studies) were found for 14 countries, while cat and rabbit data were found in only five countries and one country, respectively ( Table 2).
Among the 90 TBPs listed in this review (in livestock or pets), 66 were detected in ticks from animals and 69 directly in the animals. The highest number of pathogens was found in ticks on dogs (66.7%) ( Table 2). The list of TBPs reported in each domestic animal host and their ticks is summarized in the Table S2. The research effort, expressed by the number of publications, varies greatly from one animal to another. This is why it is difficult to conclude that an animal, or its ticks, are more or less susceptible to being infected by TBPs. In this sense, Figure 5 shows a positive correlation between the number of studies and the number of TBPs found in animals ( Figure 5B) or in their ticks ( Figure 5A). The very high correlation coefficient (0.95 and 0.98, respectively) expresses a strong correlation between these variables. If we assume that correlation does not imply causation, we can nevertheless observe a correlation between the number of TBPs found and the number of publications focusing on the different domestic animal species, and conclude what may be obvious: the more we seek, the more we find.

Overall Analysis of the Four Main Regions in the Mediterranean Basin
In this section, we divide the countries of the Mediterranean Basin into four different areas to allow for better comparison of the data found. Western Europe is made up of France, Italy, Malta, Monaco and Spain, which represented 45.7% of the publications. North Africa, which includes Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia, had a percentage of 26.1% of the total publications included in this review. The Middle East, which is composed of Cyprus, Israel, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria and Turkey, represented 17.7%. The Balkans area is made up of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Greece, Montenegro and Slovenia, and had 10.33% of the publications. The five countries in which no pathogens were found on domestic animals or their ticks were Bosnia-Herzegovina, Libya, Malta, Monaco and Syria.

Western Europe
In the five countries of this area, tick-borne pathogens on domestic animals were detected in Italy, France and Spain. These are also the three countries with the highest number of publications in the Mediterranean Basin. A total of eight domestic animal species were found to be carriers of positive ticks and pathogens: cats, cattle, dogs, donkeys, goats, horses, sheep and pigs. From our data, six tick genera from domestic animals were found to be positive for TBPs: Amblyomma spp., Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. The most commonly found host was the dog (Figure 6A), which was the main target of the genus Rhipicephalus. In addition, the most predominant tick genus found out of the seven genera collected was Rhipicephalus spp. (Figure 6B), a vector of pathogens, such as B. canis and E. canis. The other main tick genera were Ixodes, a ubiquitous genus, and Hyalomma, mainly found on livestock. Of 68 pathogens detected in this region, five were included in nearly 60% of the publications in Western Europe. They belonged to the bacteria and parasite groups E. canis, A. phagocytophilum, R. conorii, B. canis and R. massiliae ( Figure 6C). It appears that the papers found in Western Europe mainly focused on dogs, which could explain the high percentage of Rhipicephalus ticks found and TBPs related to dogs. This focus can be explained by the central place of the dog in human activities, as pets, hunting dogs or stray dogs.

Western Europe
In the five countries of this area, tick-borne pathogens on domestic animals were detected in Italy, France and Spain. These are also the three countries with the highest number of publications in the Mediterranean Basin. A total of eight domestic animal species were found to be carriers of positive ticks and pathogens: cats, cattle, dogs, donkeys, goats, horses, sheep and pigs. From our data, six tick genera from domestic animals were found to be positive for TBPs: Amblyomma spp., Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. The most commonly found host was the dog (Figure 6A), which was the main target of the genus Rhipicephalus. In addition, the most predominant tick genus found out of the seven genera collected was Rhipicephalus spp. ( Figure 6B), a vector of pathogens, such as B. canis and E. canis. The other main tick genera were Ixodes, a ubiquitous genus, and Hyalomma, mainly found on livestock. Of 68 pathogens detected in this region, five were included in nearly 60% of the publications in Western Europe. They belonged to the bacteria and parasite groups E. canis, A. phagocytophilum, R. conorii, B. canis and R. massiliae ( Figure 6C). It appears that the papers found in Western Europe mainly focused on dogs, which could explain the high percentage of Rhipicephalus ticks found and TBPs related to dogs. This focus can be explained by the central place of the dog in human activities, as pets, hunting dogs or stray dogs.

North Africa
The North Africa area has the largest diversity of domestic animal hosts of pathogens and positive ticks reported in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin, with a total of 10 domestic animal hosts: cats, cattle, chickens, buffalo, dogs, dromedaries, goats, horses, rabbits and sheep. The main animals reported were from the livestock group: cattle, sheep, goats and dromedaries ( Figure 6A). From these hosts, five tick genera were found to be positive for TBPs: Argas spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. Even though the main tick genus reported was the same as in Western Europe (genus Rhipicephalus), it was found both in livestock and pets, with equal importance in terms of health. The other main tick genus was Hyalomma spp. which was mainly found on livestock ( Figure 6B). The main TBPs reported belong to the bacteria and parasite groups: A. marginale, A. phagocytophilum, A. platys, C. burnetii and T. annulata ( Figure 6C). They are mainly related to livestock rather than pets. In North Africa, research seems to be more focused on livestock veterinary health monitoring compared to Western Europe.

The Middle East
In this area, a total of six domestic animals were reported to be carriers of positive ticks and TBPs: cattle, dogs, dromedaries, goats, horses and sheep. Similarly to Western Europe, the main domestic animal host found was the dog, closely followed by cattle, featuring in 66.7% and 62.5% of the total publications in the area, respectively ( Figure 6A). From the domestic animal hosts, five tick genera were reported to be positive for TBPs: Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. As with the two previous areas, Rhipicephalus, which can be found both on livestock and pets, was the main tick genus found. The other main tick genera were Hyalomma and Haemaphysalis, which also infested livestock ( Figure 6B). Of the 45 pathogens found in the Middle East, the most predominant were Anaplasma spp., A. phagocytophilum, Babesia spp., B. ovis and T. annulata. They were identified in 62.5% of the publications in the area ( Figure 6C). In the Middle East, the data available were related to the veterinary health of both pets and livestock to equal extents. However, they were mainly from Turkey (75.5%).

The Balkans
A total of six domestic animal hosts were reported to be carriers of positive ticks and TBPs: cats, cattle, dogs, goats, horses and sheep. Of the six domestic animal hosts reported, the main host was the dog, followed by the goat, which both seemed to be the focus of veterinary research in the four areas, probably due to their economic and social importance ( Figure 6A). Five tick genera were reported to be positive for TBPs: Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. Of the five genera found in the Balkans, the main positive tick genus collected on domestic animals was Rhipicephalus spp., followed by the genera Haemaphysalis, Ixodes and Dermacentor ( Figure 6B). A total of 32 pathogens were found in the seven countries of the Balkans area. The most frequently detected were the bacteria C. burnetii, A. platys and R. massiliae, the parasite B. canis and the CCHF virus ( Figure 6C). These were reported in 90% of the publications. As for the Middle East, these TBPs can be found in livestock and pets.

Focus on Insular Tick-Borne Pathogens in Domestic Animals and Their Ticks
The Mediterranean islands are an important place for animal migrations, human activities and pathogen circulation due to their geographical situation. A total of 44 publications were reported on islands, representing 16% of the publications taken into account in this review. These 44 publications were considered separately from the previous dataset. Out of these 44 publications, most came from the largest islands of the Mediterranean Basin: Sardinia, Sicily, Corsica and Cyprus, while some data were reported from smaller islands, such as the Greeks islands. We decided to split the islands of the western Basin, including the Aeolian islands, Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and Mallorca (36 publications), from the eastern Basin, including Crete, Cyprus, Ios, Mykonos, Santorini, Skiathos, Skopelos and Tinos (8 publications) (Table 3).
On the islands, a total of nine domestic animal hosts were studied: cats, cattle, dogs, donkeys, goats, horses, pigs, rabbits and sheep. Despite this host diversity, the majority of the islands followed the same schema as in the rest of the Mediterranean Basin, with the dog predominating as host of positive ticks and TBPs (43.2% of the island publications), followed by cattle, sheep and goats. We also observed a higher diversity of domestic animal hosts (eight species) in the data reported in the western islands (cats, cattle, dogs, donkeys, goats, horses, pigs and sheep) than in the eastern islands (five species: cats, cattle, dogs, goats and sheep) ( Table 3). In the western islands, most of the publications found were about dogs (44.4%), followed by cattle and sheep (each featuring in 36.1% of the publications). In the eastern islands, the main domestic animal hosts reported were goats and dogs, each featuring in 37.5% of the publications ( Figure 6D).
A total of six hard tick genera, and no soft ticks, were found to be positive in the data from the islands: Amblyomma spp., Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp. and Rhipicephalus spp. (Table 3). Of these genera, the main positive tick genus reported was Rhipicephalus spp., featuring in 43.2% of the island publications. This follows the same schema as the overall data. Nevertheless, the second most common genus reported was Hyalomma. This corresponds to the observations made in North Africa and the Middle East, and differs from Western Europe and the Balkans. This finding could be due to the wide distribution of Hyalomma in the Mediterranean Basin, especially on the south and east borders, with some species also on the north border [261]. This could also testify to the extension of the distribution area of this genus through animal migration and with the facilitation of climate change. This may result in the spread of TBPs, such as the CCHF virus transmitted by these ticks [19,269,270]. In this dissemination, islands may play an important role as places of transition between the different borders of the Mediterranean Basin [271]. This suggests a potential sentinel role of islands when monitoring dissemination of this tick genus and their TBPs on a continental scale ( Figure 6D).   [140,182] In the western islands, TBPs were screened and found in ticks from domestic animals in 63.9% of the papers. Meanwhile, the corresponding value was only 37.5% of the publications in the eastern islands. For both groups of islands, the main positive tick genus found was Rhipicephalus spp., in 69.6% and 100% of the publications, respectively. This shows the importance of this genus on islands across the whole Mediterranean Basin. For both western and eastern islands, this genus was succeeded in prevalence by the genus Hyalomma ( Figure 6D). From the data analyzed, it seems that there was a stronger focus on TBPs in ticks from domestic animals in the western islands than in the eastern islands.
Of the 18 genera of pathogens reported in the data, 14 genera were reported in the islands, representing 77.8% of the total genera ( Table 3). The main TBP genera detected were Anaplasma spp. and Rickettsia spp., reported in 43.2% and 40.9% of the publications concerning islands, respectively. This follows the same schema as the overall data. In the western islands, the 14 TBP genera were reported (66.7% bacteria and 33.3% parasites), while only nine were reported (77.8% bacteria and 22.2% parasites) in the eastern islands. In both groups, the main reported genus was Anaplasma, followed by Rickettsia ( Figure 6D). They were both reported in 41.7% of the western island publications, and in 50% and 37.5% of the eastern island publications, respectively. No viruses were reported in either of the island groups.
Even though few data were reported for the islands (16%), a high diversity of TBPs was reported. This may indicate the importance of islands in the monitoring of TBPs in domestic animals in the Mediterranean Basin.

Conclusions
In this study, 90 TBPs from 18 genera of bacteria, parasites and viruses were reported in domestic animals and their ticks in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin. Most pathogens were bacteria, followed by parasites and viruses. The main genera detected were bacteria: Anaplasma spp. and Rickettsia spp. The data collected reflected a high diversity of TBPs in domestic animals and their ticks in the countries of the Mediterranean Basin, which shows their importance in veterinary and human health. A wide range of pathogens was reported in seven positive tick genera (six hard ticks and one soft tick) and 31 tick species. The most-reported genus was Rhipicephalus spp., a genus found in a large range of domestic animals, from livestock to pets. This genus is also known for the transmission of TBPs from the genera Anaplasma and Rickettsia. These TBPs and positive tick genera were reported in 12 different domestic animal hosts divided into two groups: livestock and pets. The main domestic animal hosts were both dogs and cattle, from which the highest diversity of TBPs was reported. This seems linked to the quantity of data reported for these hosts. In the four areas of the Mediterranean Basin (Western Europe, North Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans), the main studied host was the dog (except in North Africa) and the main positive tick genus was Rhipicephalus. Depending on the area, the second most important genera were Ixodes or Hyalomma. This could be due to the distribution area of Ixodes spp. in Europe and the distribution area of Hyalomma spp. on the south border of the Mediterranean Basin and its expansion through the islands [260,267]. The diversity of the TBPs identified in this review was linked to the domestic animals targeted in the studies and to the animals' veterinary and social importance. In all, 16% of the publications concerned TBPs from domestic animals and their ticks on islands, but high diversity of domestic animal hosts (nine of 12), positive tick genera (six of seven) and TBP genera (14 of 18) was reported for the islands. This shows the importance of the Mediterranean islands in the monitoring of TBPs in this region as sentinel territories. The development of research on the islands could provide a better understanding of their role as a hotspot for the circulation of ticks and tick-borne pathogens.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10061236/s1, Table S1: Positive engorged ticks for TBPs collected on domestic animals and their distribution in the Mediterranean Basin; Table S2: TBP species reported in domestic animals or engorged ticks collected on these animals from the Mediterranean Basin.
Author Contributions: B.D., S.M., V.P. and Y.Q. conceived the scientific ideas. B.D., S.M., V.P. and Y.Q. performed and discussed the work and edited the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and provided critical feedback. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding:
The research work of B.D.: Y.Q. and V.P. was supported by UMR 6134, University of Corsica and the CNRS. B.D. was awarded a grant from the Corsican Regional Council. This study was supported by funding from the French Government and from the Corsican Regional Council (CPER project), and also by the GERHYCO interdisciplinary project dedicated to water management, ecology and hydro-ecosystem services in insular context. S.M.'s research was supported by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES). UMR BIPAR is supported by the French Government's Investissement d'Avenir program, Laboratoire d'Excellence "Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases" (grant No. ANR-10LABEX-62-IBEID).

Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement:
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material. Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.