1. Introduction
In recent virtual/augmented reality (VR/AR) interfaces and teleoperation environments, haptic feedback has attracted significant attention because it can provide rich tactile information through skin contact without increasing the visual load on the user. The presentation of directional information, typified by navigation and operation guidance, is particularly effective in situations where visual information tends to become overloaded. During vehicle driving or AR content use, for example, interfaces are required that can direct the user’s attention without demanding additional eye movements. The importance of information presentation through non-visual modalities is therefore growing. Such applications demand an actuator that is compact while being capable of presenting multidirectional tactile cues.
Among the many tactile presentation methods, including those based on pressure and friction, vibration-based tactile displays are the most widely used. A variety of vibrawoo tors have been developed for this purpose, differing mainly in how they convert input signals into motion, and they have been incorporated into interfaces ranging from handheld devices whose whole body oscillates to wearable systems with many small elements across the skin [
1]. Representative examples include eccentric rotating mass (ERM) vibrators, linear resonant actuators (LRAs), and piezoelectric actuators (PZAs). Each of these, however, has its own strengths and limitations in terms of compactness, response speed, and controllability. ERM vibrators are low in cost but respond slowly and couple frequency and amplitude to the applied voltage, limiting the range of presentable patterns [
2,
3]. LRAs respond faster but, being driven at resonance, lose output away from the resonant frequency and exhibit residual vibration [
2,
3]. PZAs offer fast, wideband vibration but require a high driving voltage and a dedicated driving circuit [
2,
3].
Shape-memory alloys (SMAs) have been used as a compact and lightweight actuation source in a wide range of fields, from aerospace mechanisms, such as a passive lock-and-release actuator driven by solar radiation [
4], to medical and wearable devices, and they have also been increasingly applied to haptic interfaces [
5]. SMA wires have been investigated as an actuation source [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10]. Because an SMA wire is actuated by Joule-heating-induced phase transformation, it requires neither an electromagnetic motor nor a resonance mechanism, offering the potential to control vibration frequency and amplitude with a simple driving configuration. Several implementations have been reported, including directly transmitting the micro-vibration of an SMA wire to the skin [
7], delivering stimuli through a pin mechanism driven by an SMA wire [
6,
8,
9], and arranging multiple vibration units on eyeglasses or a headband to present tactile sensations around the face [
10]. We have also developed a vibrator that delivers vibration through a moving element driven by an SMA wire, demonstrating that an SMA wire can serve as a practical actuation source [
11].
Using these actuators, two main approaches have been studied for presenting direction with vibrators: waveform-based approaches, which drive a single vibrator with asymmetric vibration waveforms to indicate a direction [
12,
13,
14,
15,
16], and spatial-arrangement approaches, which arrange multiple vibrators at different locations [
17,
18,
19,
20,
21]. In waveform-based approaches, a vibrator is driven by an asymmetric acceleration waveform, which is perceived as a continuous pull in a specific direction owing to the nonlinear characteristics of human tactile perception. Amemiya et al. established this principle using a single ungrounded vibrator [
12,
13], and subsequent studies reproduced the same effect with compact voice-coil vibrators and examined its dependence on driving conditions such as frequency [
14,
15,
16]. While a single vibrator can indicate a direction in this way, it conveys only one axis, such as left–right motion; presenting additional directions requires multiple vibrators, which increases the volume, mass, and complexity of the device and makes planar directional presentation difficult.
In spatial-arrangement approaches, multiple vibrators are placed at different locations and driven sequentially so that the perceived position of vibration shifts across the body to indicate a direction. This principle has been applied to various body sites and form factors, including a glove that guides the hand in three-dimensional space [
17], a layout that presents rotational patterns around the hand [
19], and a head-mounted device for navigation cues [
21]. The number of directions that such layouts can present is fundamentally limited by how closely vibrators can be placed while remaining distinguishable, which depends on factors such as vibrator type and vibration intensity [
18,
20]. Consequently, presenting more directions requires more vibrators and a larger device, while keeping the device compact entails a more complex internal structure and control system. As a result, presenting two-dimensional directional vibration with a single compact vibrator remains challenging.
To overcome these limitations, a different approach has recently been explored, in which directional acceleration is generated within a two-dimensional plane using a single device [
22]. However, this device produces a single-shot impact rather than continuous vibration, and thus does not function as a vibrator. Moreover, controlling the magnitude of the generated acceleration remains difficult. The significance of generating directional acceleration is supported by the close relationship between acceleration and vibrotactile perception: the perceived intensity of vibrotactile stimuli has been shown to increase monotonically with the acceleration amplitude of the vibration [
23]. Therefore, generating directional acceleration in a controlled manner is itself meaningful for vibrotactile presentation.
We previously developed a compact vibrator that drives a moving element with an SMA wire and a tension spring, and measured the acceleration it generated [
11]. However, extending this device to two-dimensional directional control posed a problem: the tension spring, which was required to restore the wire, biased the generated acceleration toward a single direction and broke the structural symmetry of the device, making two-dimensional directional presentation difficult.
To address this problem, this paper proposes a directional vibrator using SMA wires. In the proposed structure, a weight is suspended by four SMA wires arranged along the diagonals of a square and driven by pulse-width-modulated (PWM) current signals. This symmetric, spring-free configuration enables the generation of two-dimensional directional acceleration with a single compact device. A prototype was fabricated, and driving experiments were conducted under three different driving frequencies. The results demonstrate that the device generates directional acceleration and that its magnitude can be adjusted by changing the driving conditions. The perceptual evaluation of the presented direction is left for future work using user experiments.
4. Results
This section presents the experimental results obtained using the measurement system described in
Section 3.
To characterize the device’s dynamic response, the acceleration waveform from a single driving pulse and the frequency response obtained by FFT analysis are first examined.
The directional characteristics of the generated acceleration are then evaluated by measuring the in-plane acceleration under single-pulse driving at 1 Hz and continuous driving at 20 Hz and 50 Hz, and projecting the acceleration vector onto the phase plane.
Finally, the relationship between the duty ratio and the peak acceleration magnitude is investigated.
4.1. Time-Domain Response and Frequency Characteristics Under Single-Pulse Driving
The SMA wires were driven by a single pulse at 1 Hz with a 1.0% duty ratio, and the acceleration was measured at a 30 μs sampling interval. Data were obtained for all eight target directions of 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, 315°, and 360°.
Figure 12a,b show the time-series acceleration for two representative driving directions, with shaded regions indicating the ON interval of the pulse signal.
As seen in
Figure 12, the first rise occurs within 2 ms, and the maximum acceleration is reached approximately 14 ms after the start of energization. However, there is an approximately 1 ms interval before the rise during which the acceleration changes little. In addition, the device vibrates both during and after energization rather than simply contracting and relaxing.
To characterize the frequency response of the device structure itself, the power spectra of the accelerations
and
in the
x- and
y-axes directions for each driving direction condition are shown in
Figure 13. These results show that the structure has peaks near 343 Hz and near 450 Hz. This indicates that the device does not behave as a simple first-order system.
4.2. Directional Characteristics of Generated Acceleration
The acceleration was measured under three driving frequencies: 1 Hz with a single pulse, and 20 Hz and 50 Hz with repeated pulses. The duty ratio ranges were 0.3–1.5% in increments of 0.1% for 1 Hz, 0.5–1.5% for 20 Hz, and 0.5–1.8% for 50 Hz, with the same increment applied throughout. The sampling interval was 30 μs for all conditions. For each driving frequency, a representative duty ratio is selected to evaluate the directional characteristics of the generated acceleration across all target directions.
The acceleration is obtained as time-domain waveforms of the orthogonal components
x and
y. While the time-domain waveform under the 1 Hz condition was shown in
Figure 12,
Figure 14 shows examples of the time-domain waveforms under the 20 Hz and 50 Hz driving conditions, where the shaded regions indicate the energized intervals. Each energized interval is followed by a rise in acceleration and a subsequent decaying oscillation, and this response is repeated in synchronization with the pulses.
To examine the direction of the generated acceleration, these time-domain data are converted into points on the x–y plane following the procedure described in
Section 3.3.
Figure 15 shows the results for the 1 Hz driving condition at a duty ratio of 1.0%, with the plotted accelerations color-coded by energized and non-energized states using a color map. As shown in
Figure 15a, we clearly distinguish “the target direction”, which denotes the specific orientation toward which the moving part is intended to be driven, from “the axis of the target direction”, the straight line passing through this direction and its opposite.
The acceleration during energization is distributed along this axis in
Figure 15. However,
Figure 15c,e,g show that the vibration of the non-energized state deviates from the axis.
Figure 16 shows the results for the 20 Hz driving condition at a duty ratio of 1.5%, with the plotted accelerations using a color map. In every case, acceleration is generated along the axis of the target direction. In
Figure 16c,g, acceleration that is not aligned with this axis is also generated. In addition, in
Figure 16b,f,h, the acceleration is slightly inclined from the axis of the target direction.
Figure 17 shows the results for the 50 Hz driving condition at a duty ratio of 1.8%, with the plotted accelerations using a color map. In every case, acceleration is generated along the axis of the target direction with little off-axis component.
Figure 18,
Figure 19 and
Figure 20 show histograms of the angular error with respect to the target direction, aggregated over all eight target directions, measured when the in-plane acceleration magnitude reaches its first peak value and when it reaches its maximum value, under driving conditions of 1 Hz at a duty ratio of 1.0%, 20 Hz at 1.5%, and 50 Hz at 1.8%, respectively. The histograms use a bin width of 45°, spanning 0° to 315°. In each figure, the energized and non-energized intervals are shown separately, each at the first peak and at the maximum value. It should be noted that because the fixed part is accelerated by the reaction force of the moving part, its acceleration is ideally oriented in the direction opposite to that of the moving part.
In
Figure 18a, the first peak during energization is oriented opposite to the target direction, indicating that the moving part is accelerated in the target direction.
Figure 18b,c show that the measured fixed-part acceleration is concentrated at 0° and 180° relative to the target direction, distributed across both sides rather than biased toward one side. This indicates that although the acceleration is aligned with the axis of the target direction, its orientation is not distinguished. In
Figure 19a,c and
Figure 20a,c, there is no angular directionality. On the other hand, the first peak in the non-energized interval, as shown in
Figure 19b and
Figure 20b, is oriented opposite to the target direction, indicating that the moving part is accelerated in the target direction.
4.3. Control of Acceleration Magnitude via Duty Ratio and Driving Frequency
This section examines how the duty ratio d and the driving frequency f affect the magnitude of the generated acceleration. To this end, the peak acceleration magnitude is measured as a function of the duty ratio at three driving frequencies, 1 Hz, 20 Hz, and 50 Hz.
The acceleration was measured under three driving frequencies: 1 Hz with a single pulse, and 20 Hz and 50 Hz with repeated pulses. The duty ratio ranges were 0.3–1.5% at 1 Hz, 0.5–1.5% at 20 Hz, and 0.5–1.8% at 50 Hz, in increments of 0.1%. The sampling interval was 30 μs for all conditions. For each driving frequency and duty ratio condition, acceleration data were collected for all eight target directions.
Figure 21 shows the relationship between the duty ratio and the peak acceleration magnitude for each driving frequency, separately for the energized (SMA ON) and non-energized (SMA OFF) intervals, with the mean across all eight target directions plotted as the marker and the standard deviation as the error bar.
Figure 21a shows that, at 1 Hz, the maximum acceleration during energization increases with duty ratio from 0.3% to 0.7%, then becomes constant regardless of duty ratio. At 20 Hz and 50 Hz, the maximum acceleration during energization does not change with duty ratio.
Figure 21b shows that the maximum acceleration increases with the duty ratio for all three frequencies, and that a lower driving frequency yields a higher maximum acceleration under the same duty ratio.
These results show that, at a fixed driving frequency, the magnitude of the generated acceleration can be adjusted by varying the pulse current duty ratio in the non-energized interval.
5. Discussion
In this study, we proposed a directional vibrator in which a weight is suspended by four SMA wires arranged along the diagonals of a square and driven by PWM current signals.
Here we discuss the dynamic behavior of the device observed under single-pulse driving. The time-domain response showed that the device continued to vibrate not only during energization but also after the pulse ended, rather than simply contracting and relaxing once. This behavior cannot be explained by the contraction of the SMA wire alone, which would produce a single rise and decay following the pulse. Instead, it indicates that the suspended weight and the SMA wires together form an oscillatory system that behaves like a second-order system. This interpretation can be supported by the frequency spectra, which exhibited clear peaks near 343 Hz and 450 Hz; these peaks correspond to the natural frequencies of the structure, confirming that the device possesses inherent oscillatory modes rather than responding as a simple first-order element.
In addition, the acceleration showed almost no change during approximately the first 1 ms after the onset of energization, before the clear rise began. This initial delay is attributed to the time required for the SMA wire to take up its slack and reach its transformation temperature before generating a clear reaction force. Until the wire begins to contract and transmit force to the weight, no appreciable acceleration is produced, which accounts for the short interval observed before the response.
We next discuss the directional characteristics of the generated acceleration. The behavior differed between the energized and non-energized states. The energized-state acceleration was distributed along the axis of the target direction, whereas the non-energized state sometimes deviated from it, as observed under the 1 Hz and 20 Hz conditions. This difference arises because the SMA wire actively generates force through contraction during energization, while in the non-energized state it relaxes and returns passively toward its structural equilibrium; the latter motion is therefore governed by the structure rather than by the intended driving direction.
In addition, under the 20 Hz condition, the acceleration was slightly inclined from the axis of the target direction in
Figure 16b,f,h. This inclination is considered to originate from structural imperfections, such as asymmetry in the weight geometry or imbalance in the wire tension.
Under the 50 Hz condition, in contrast, the acceleration was aligned with the axis of the target direction in all eight directions with a minor off-axis component. This frequency dependence is explained by the length of the non-energized interval relative to the decay time of the structural vibration. As the driving frequency increases, the non-energized interval becomes shorter, and under the 50 Hz condition the wire begins to contract under the next pulse before the vibration excited by the previous pulse has attenuated. As a result, the passive structural vibration that causes off-axis acceleration has less influence, and the acceleration remains aligned with the axis of the target direction.
We further discuss the orientation of the generated acceleration evaluated from the angular histograms. The orientation of the acceleration showed a clear frequency dependence. At the low driving frequency of 1 Hz, the acceleration was aligned with the axis of the target direction at both the first peak and the maximum value, in both the energized and non-energized intervals. At the higher driving frequencies of 20 Hz and 50 Hz, however, the acceleration in the energized interval showed no clear angular directionality, whereas that in the non-energized interval remained aligned with the axis of the target direction.
The absence of angular directionality in the energized interval at higher frequencies is considered to be because the energized interval is too short for the device to begin effective motion; during this interval the acceleration changes little, so no clear orientation appears. In the non-energized interval, by contrast, the moving part is released and accelerated toward the axis of the target direction.
Finally, we discuss how peak acceleration depends on the duty ratio at a fixed driving frequency. We examine the energized interval shown in
Figure 21a and the non-energized interval shown in
Figure 21b in turn.
In the energized interval, the maximum acceleration did not increase with the duty ratio, but the underlying mechanism differed between the low- and high-frequency conditions. At 1 Hz, the acceleration first increased with the duty ratio and then saturated. This saturation can be attributed to the onset of stress-induced martensitic transformation in the SMA wire. Because the wire is subjected to a constant tensile bias load, a temperature rise promotes not only thermally driven but also stress-induced martensitic transformation beyond a certain duty ratio. Once this occurs, the apparent tangent modulus of the wire decreases under tensile stress, as reported by Šittner et al. [
25], which limits any further increase in the contraction force of the wire. Meanwhile, the opposing bias tension continues to rise as the wire contracts, so the two forces approach a balance beyond which the acceleration no longer increases. At 20 Hz and 50 Hz, by contrast, the acceleration did not increase with the duty ratio at all, because the energization duration, approximately 0.75 ms at 20 Hz and 0.36 ms at 50 Hz, is shorter than the roughly 1 ms delay observed before the onset of wire contraction in
Figure 12. Within such a short energized interval, the wire has not yet begun to contract, so no effective motion is generated regardless of the duty ratio. Controlling the acceleration during the energized interval would therefore require a control method that also accounts for the stress-induced transformation.
In the non-energized interval, the maximum acceleration increased with the duty ratio at all three frequencies, and a lower driving frequency yielded a higher acceleration under the same duty ratio. Both trends can be understood in terms of the heat supplied to the wire by a single pulse. From Equations (1) and (2), at a fixed frequency f, a larger duty ratio d corresponds to a longer pulse width W. Also, when the duty ratio is fixed, decreasing the frequency lengthens the pulse width W. A longer pulse width means greater Joule heating per pulse, which leads to a greater degree of thermally induced transformation toward the austenite phase during energization. Upon de-energization, the austenite reverts to martensite and releases the accumulated transformation strain. Because a greater proportion of austenite is presumed to have formed under a longer pulse width, the released strain becomes larger, and the resulting displacement of the vibrator increases, producing a higher acceleration.
These results indicate that, in the non-energized interval, the acceleration magnitude can be adjusted through the duty ratio at a fixed driving frequency, and is also affected by the driving frequency at a fixed duty ratio. Because both parameters act on the wire through the supplied Joule heat, they are thermally coupled rather than independent. A quantitative characterization of this thermal control by the two parameters in the present device is left for future work.
Finally, we note several aspects that were not investigated experimentally in this study. Power consumption was estimated only for the instantaneous and average values, and the precise power consumption under continuous operation was not quantified. Because the wire resistance varies with temperature and the average power depends on the driving conditions, an accurate measurement under continuous operation remains to be carried out. In addition, the long-term durability and the repeatability of the SMA wires under repeated driving were not evaluated, so the fatigue behavior and the stability of the generated acceleration over extended operation remain to be confirmed. These aspects are left for future work, in which thermal behavior, power consumption during continuous operation, and durability under repeated driving will be examined to provide data for practical design.