Shrinkage and Consolidation Characteristics of Chitosan-Amended Soft Soil—A Sustainable Alternate Land ﬁ ll Liner Material

: Ku tt anad is a region that lies in the southwest part of Kerala, India, and possesses soft soil, which imposes constraints on many civil engineering applications owing to low shear strength and high compressibility. Chemical stabilizers such as cement and lime have been extensively utilized in the past to address compressibility issues. However, future civilizations will be extremely dependent on the development of sustainable materials and practices such as the use of bio-en-zymes, calcite precipitation methods, and biological materials as a result of escalating environmental concerns due to carbon emissions of conventional stabilizers. One such alternative is the utilization of biopolymers. The current study investigates the e ﬀ ect of chitosan (biopolymer extracted from shrimp shells) in improving the consolidation and shrinkage characteristics of these soft soils. The dosages adopted are 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%. One-dimensional ﬁ xed ring consolidation tests indicate that consolidation characteristics are improved upon the addition of chitosan up to an optimum dosage of 2%. The coe ﬃ cient of consolidation increases up to seven times that of untreated soil, indicating the acceleration of the consolidation process by incorporating chitosan. The shrinkage potential is reduced by 11% after amendment with 4% chitosan and all the treated samples exhibit zero signs of curling. Based on the ﬁ ndings from consolidation and shrinkage data, carbon emission assessments are carried out for a typical land ﬁ ll liner amended with an optimum dosage of chitosan. In comparison to conventional stabilizers like cement and lime, the results indicate that chitosan minimized carbon emissions by 7.325 times and 8.754 times, respectively.


Introduction
Soft soil deposits pose severe constraints to the infrastructural development of any region.Some of these deposits undergo excessive settlements owing to their poor geotechnical characteristics [1].The Kuttanad region is a stretch of low-lying land on the west coast of India and comprises silt and clay fraction [2].A major portion of the region remains submerged during the monsoon season every year [3].The behavior of these soft soils is predominantly dependent on the mineral type and microstructural arrangement.The unique structure developed by the insitu soil depends on the depositional environment and post-diagenetic process, which contribute additional strength and stiffness in comparison to remolded soil [4].Amelioration with chemical amendments such as fly ash, cement, lime, nano calcium silicate, coal gangue, ground granulated blast furnace slag, nano-chemicals like terrasil, and fiber-reinforced lime has proven their effectiveness in improving the properties of soft soils globally [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].
Several studies in the past have established the presence of organic matter in the deposits found in the Kuttanad region [20,21].The studies have confirmed the presence of montmorillonite, hydromica, kaolinite, quartz, and possibly traces of gibbsite, chlorite, feldspar, and amphibole in the soil [21].From a geotechnical standpoint, these clays are unfavorable due to their high compressibility, low shear strength, high permeability, and high proportion of organic content [22].Lack of proper engineering judgment in the past has led to the collapse of embankments and bridges in this region [23].Consequently, indepth research on organic clays is necessary to successfully address unfavorable ground conditions.The inclusion of coir geotextile accelerated the consolidation in a shorter period and reduced the chances of premature failure [24].Other techniques attempted to stabilize and mitigate the vulnerability of these deposits comprise the precompression techniques [25], stone columns [26], lime columns [27], and fiber reinforcement [28].Amendments with lime, fly ash [29], and cement [21] have also modified the engineering properties of Kuttanad soil considerably.
The consolidation and shrinkage characteristics of organic soils bear significance in the performance of the soil.There have been studies conducted to assess the consolidation characteristics of soft soils using biopolymers.Tests conducted on montmorillonite and kaolinite using 1% and 1.5% of xanthan gum revealed the formation of new cementitious products formed as a result of the interaction between xanthan gum and soil particles.This led to the bridging between soil particles and the strengthening of bonds.The extended curing period of 90 days led to a reduction in compression and swelling indices by more than 50% [46].The amendment of clayey soil with low plasticity using carboxyl methyl cellulose reduced the void ratio from 0.6 to 0.2 at a dosage of 5% [47].Another issue that persists in a compacted clay liner is desiccation cracking due to internal and external circumstances in the final cover system, which leads to rainfall infiltration and affects the structural integrity.The permeability of the system increases by three orders of magnitude in such cases and leads to inefficiency.The soil may even exhibit curling up (convex) or curling down (concave) behavior during the process of shrinkage or desiccation cracking, especially in remolded conditions.A non-homogeneous distribution of particles, layer thickness, liquid limit, plastic limit, hydraulic conductivity, lift-off height, curvature, and soil type will influence the curling characteristics [48].Amendments such as lime and cement have been introduced to fine-grained soil in the past to satisfy strength, and settlement criteria and offer resistance against cracking.However, the performance of these materials has been insufficient in satisfying the desired requirements.Recently, biopolymers have been incorporated to control desiccation cracking in soft soils.Low and high plastic clays amended with guar gum and xanthan gum have reduced the shrinkage potential [38,49].
Another novel material named chitosan is derived from the exoskeleton of marine waste and has been widely employed in the field of geoenvironmental engineering.Chitosan has exhibited a remarkable performance in heavy metal retainment and has served as an effective adsorbent in soil and water remediation [50][51][52].Recent works using chitosan have explored the possibility of soil amelioration [53].Chitosan has proved to be an efficient amendment for the long-term strength of sand and the short-term strength of clay.While the mechanism of improvement for the chitosan-clay mix can be attributed to the electrostatic force of attraction, the sandy soils are bridged by the chitosan gel formed between them [54].The dissolution of chitosan in acetic acid renders it cationic and cohesive in nature.The chitosan hydrogel formed will dehydrate to form fibers with time and bridge the soil particles, leading to a stable clayey structure [55].The aggregated and flocculated structure induced by chitosan in kaolinite creates a rigid structure and leads to an elevated strength performance.However, higher dosages facilitate lubrication among particles and reduce cohesion, leading to a reduced compressive strength [56].The literature review on chitosan-amended soils revealed that most of the studies evaluated the strength characteristics of cohesionless and cohesive soils.Seldom researchers have investigated the modification in compressibility and shrinkage properties of fine-grained soils utilizing chitosan [57].
The goal of the United Nations to integrate the 17 Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 has prompted geotechnical engineers to undertake the sustainability assessment for the works being carried out.Seldom works in the field of geotechnical engineering have conducted carbon emission analysis.In this regard, it becomes imperative to critically evaluate the carbon footprint of the various materials utilized in ground improvement works.The current study investigates the influence of a polysaccharide-based biopolymer derived from shrimp shells, named chitosan, on the consolidation characteristics of soft soil.At the onset, the material properties of soil and chitosan have been discussed.The latter part of the manuscript details the one-dimensional consolidation tests conducted on soils amended with various chitosan dosages of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%.The effect of the aforementioned dosages on the coefficient of consolidation, compression index, swelling index, and coefficient of permeability has been discussed along with the mechanism causing the variation.Cracking in soils is a common phenomenon under soil-atmosphere interaction in clayey soils.Additionally, evaporation has a profound influence on the thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior and engineering properties of soils, and hence the potential of untreated and treated soils against shrinkage cracking was evaluated by bar linear shrinkage tests.To assess the contribution of chitosan to greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint analysis (CFA) of a typical landfill liner section amended with chitosan has been carried out in the current study.

Soil
Soil excavated from Kuttamangalam, Kuttanad, Kerala, India (9°29′14.9"N 76° 23′25.1"E) from a depth of 2 m was used for the study.The basic properties of the soil were determined based on relevant ASTM codes.The physical properties of the soil are presented in Table 1, and the particle size distribution is shown in Figure 1.Chitosan, an extract from crab or shrimp shells or any other crustacean shells, is the second-most prevalent biological macromolecule after cellulose.It is white in color and flaky in texture.Its nomenclature is 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-α-D-glucose-(N-acetylglucosamine).The chitosan used in the study was purchased from Swakit Biotech Private Limited.It is a flexible, naturally occurring hydrophilic polymer.The polysaccharide chitin, which is present in the exoskeleton of shrimp, lobster, and crabs and the cell mass of numerous parasites, is converted to biopolymer chitosan through N-deacetylation.Chitosan also has applications in the food industry as a thickening agent, manufacturing eco-friendly fertilizers, etc. Chitosan has improved strength by 85% for earthen construction materials [63].Several studies on soil rejuvenation have confirmed the positive influence of chitosan on the strength characteristics of fine-grained soils [55,64].It is also proven that the incorporation of chitosan in sandy soils improved the cohesion and other mechanical properties of the soil [54].The chitosan procured from Swakit Biotech appeared in the form of flakes, with a moisture content and degree of acetylation of 6-8% and greater than 88%.The viscosity is reported in the range of 75-150 csp with a density of 0.25 g/cm 3 .The procured soil was treated with various doses of chitosan for the current experimental investigation.

Sample Preparation
The soft soil was oven-dried for 24 h and pulverized to fines and the soil passing through a 425 µm sieve was collected for performing the tests.The dry mixing method was adopted for the current study wherein chitosan was added as a percentage of the dry weight of soil.The dosages selected were 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%.

One-Dimensional Consolidation Test
The incremental loading method of a one-dimensional consolidation test was adopted for testing the remolded and chitosan-admixed soil samples in a conventional consolidometer apparatus following ASTM D2435 [65].The procedure is illustrated in Figure 2. The one-dimensional consolidation test examines the pace and degree of soil settling with lateral confinement and vertical loading.The soil was mixed at an optimum moisture content of 23.6% and the mixture was compacted into consolidation rings of 60 mm diameter and 20 mm height by pressing and kneading to avoid air entrapment.The samples were not subjected to any curing periods for the tests conducted and were immediately subjected to testing.The sample surface was trimmed off to ensure the exact volume of the mold.The ring was placed in the consolidation apparatus and the accessories were fixed thereafter.It was then connected to the outlet with pipe and the sample was arranged for loading.The loading range selected was 12.5 kPa-800 kPa and the load increment ratio was fixed as 1.A seating stress of 6.25 kPa was applied initially to ensure the proper seating of the load and the cell alignment.Each load was maintained for approximately 24 h.The coefficient of consolidation was calculated using the logarithm of the time-fitting method using the time-settlement plot.Using the values of the coefficient of consolidation (Cv), the coefficient of volume compressibility (mv), the unit weight of water (ɣw), and the void ratio (e), the hydraulic conductivity (k) of untreated and amended soils was calculated.

Bar Linear Shrinkage Tests
Bar linear shrinkage tests were performed following BS 1377: Part 1-1990 [66] on the chitosan-treated soil.The adopted water content was equivalent to the liquid limit of the chitosan-soil mix for performing the shrinkage tests.A brass mold (141 mm x 20 mm x 12.5 mm) was fabricated for placing the chitosan-soil mix.Free shrinking was allowed by applying a thin layer of silicon grease to the inner sides of the mold.Air pockets were removed by tapping the mold and the mix was leveled along the top of the mold.Air drying of the specimen was allowed until the specimen shrunk and deformed away from the walls of the mold.Natural shrinkage was simulated by exposing the specimen to an atmospheric temperature.A high-resolution camera was fixed from a height to capture the shrinkage process at regular intervals.The tests were conducted twice for the repeatability of results.Equation ( 1) can be used for computing the linear shrinkage.
where Li = initial length of specimen (mm) and Ld =dried length of specimen (mm).

Scanning Electron Microscopy
The microstructures of soft soil amended with chitosan were studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).The air-dried samples were analyzed utilizing TESCAN VEGA 3 LMU high-performance, Variable Pressure Analytical SEM with LAB6 having a high resolution of 2 nm.

Carbon Footprint Analysis (CFA)
The various stages involved in a material or service, such as its production, transportation, and field application, directly or indirectly release various gases into the environment, which may have an impact on the global warming crisis.The extent of the impact of these gases is defined by the term "Carbon Footprint".The global mean temperatures are on the rise due to the increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere over the years.The consideration of all the gases in analyzing the carbon footprint of a project is a comprehensive procedure.A parameter called CO2 equivalent was introduced by [67,68] to convert the effect of each gas into a single unit for easier comparison and analysis.The equivalent unit of CO2 is named as embodied carbon equivalent factor (ECF).The current study utilized the normalized ECFs to calculate the carbon emissions released throughout the different phases.
The carbon emission analysis is divided into 3 phases: 1. Consideration of materials required for the project.
2. Acquisition and haulage of materials.
3. Site operations in the project site.

Effect of Chitosan on Compression Index (Cc) and Swelling Index (Cs)
Consolidation experiments demonstrated the soil-biopolymer mix's compressibility in the presence of water.The changes in void ratio with varying consolidation pressures for different chitosan dosages are displayed in Figure 3.The volume change occurring within the untreated soil matrix during the loading stage is primarily due to the slipping of the particles.These particles do not regain their original positions upon the removal of the load increment.The marginal rebound occurring upon unloading is due to the elastic compression of the adsorbed water around the particles and is a peculiarity of kaoliniterich soils [69].The compressibility curves of the chitosan-treated soils took a downward shift compared to the untreated soil.This indicates that the void ratio of the treated soils reduced considerably from 1.0 to 0.3 up to a dosage of 2%.The final equilibrium void ratio for the treated soils up to a 2% dosage has been reduced for the loading duration compared to untreated soil.For all dosages, it can be noted that the void ratio change is marginal at lower consolidation pressure of 25 kPa.The lower pressure is insufficient to cause pore water expulsion, leading to minimal volume change in the untreated and treated soils.The compressibility achieved can be due to the shearing resistance at the near contact points and the change in the volume of the soil sample as a result of shear displacement [70].However, the 4% dosage led to an increase in void ratio as exhibited in Figure 3.
Chitosan can act as a flocculating agent, causing soil particles to aggregate and form larger particles.This can reduce the overall surface area of the soil and decrease the void ratio.The higher strength and stiffness imparted by the flocculation phenomena lead to an increased resistance against compression [71].At higher dosages of 4%, there is the formation of clumps, which occupy the soil matrix and lead to an increase in voids, which aids in the removal of pore water upon application of surcharge loads.The trend observed for the compression index and swelling index of the soil upon interaction with chitosan particles has been discussed (Figures 4 and 5).The compressibility index (Cc) denotes the change in void ratio with regard to the rise in effective stress.Upon an increase in pressure, electrostatic forces that hold water are not sufficient and lead to the expulsion of water [34].The compressibility of the soil increased with a rise in consolidation pressure for the untreated and amended soils due to a decrease in soil thickness.Under the influence of lower loads for 0.5%, the increase in the diffused double layer of the soil increases its thickness, leading to a drop in Cc, especially at 25 kPa and 50 kPa.This positive modification in Cc is more beneficial than the xanthan-gum-treated kaolinite wherein the compressibility further increased at the same dosage of 0.5% [72][73][74].The modification in Cc due to different biopolymers on kaolinite is presented in Table 2.The situation can be further aggravated in kaolinite in the presence of organic content.The high water-holding capacity of the organic matter and xanthan gum will further elevate the porosity of the xanthan gum-soil mix, leading to higher compressibility [75].Hence, the detrimental effect of xanthan gum on organic soils can be mitigated by the inclusion of polysaccharide biopolymers as indicated in the present study.The Cc value continued to drop with an increase in chitosan dosage compared to unamended soil.A marginal increase in Cc was observed beyond 2%, owing to the agglomeration of particles into clumps and eventually decreasing the void ratio.This can be attributed to soil grain binding via hydrogen bonding between the OH group of chitosan and the positively charged edges of clay particles [76].Generally, the untreated soil exhibited negligible rebound upon unloading (load decrement ratio of 4).The same trend was exhibited by the soil treated with different dosages of chitosan.The swelling index (Cs) decreased from 0.015 for untreated to 0.007 for the 2% dosage, beyond which the swelling index slightly increased to 0.011 for 4% at 200 kPa.At lower stresses of 12.5 kPa and 50 kPa, the swelling indices initially dropped with an increase in chitosan dosage and rose to a maximum at 4% dosage.The reduced swell values of the treated soils indicate that chitosan addition subdues the swelling capacity of the soil, which can be beneficial during and after construction.The reduction in the compressibility and swelling of kaolinitic soils using chitosan is higher than that of xanthan-gum-treated kaolinite [46].

Effect of Chitosan on Coefficient of Consolidation (Cv) and Hydraulic Conductivity (k)
The coefficient of consolidation (Figure 6) and hydraulic conductivity (Figure 7) were calculated for every dosage of chitosan.The Cv values for untreated soil decreased as the pressure increased from 100 to 800 kPa owing to pore water ejection, which affected the soil structure and resulted in a decrease in the void ratio.At 100 kPa, the untreated soil possessed a coefficient of consolidation of 6.24 m 2 /year, which increased with an increase in the dosage of chitosan, i.e., 10.08 m 2 /year for 0.5%, 19.28 m 2 /year for 1%, and a maximum value of 43.32 m 2 /year for 2%, which is nearly seven times that of untreated soil, and then decreased again to a value of 10.74 m 2 /year for the 4% chitosan dosage.This indicates that the addition of chitosan accelerated the consolidation process up to a dosage of 2% in a shorter duration and then decelerated.A similar increase in Cv has been reported for low organic soil treated with nano calcium carbonate [76].However, the rate of increase in Cv is lower compared to chitosan-amended soil.The non-cohesiveness of chitosan promoted an easy expulsion of free water [57].At all dosages, the Cv values were higher than that of untreated soil.The addition of chitosan in the soil causes the aggregation of soil particles by being a lightweight and voluminous filler material as depicted in Figures 8 and 9.This mechanism results in a reduction in the number of contact points and thus increases the flow path for the pore water expulsion.This leads to a marginal increase in hydraulic conductivity value (k) upon 0.5% of chitosan inclusion within the soil matrix at 100 kPa.With an increase in consolidation pressure, there was more expulsion of water, resulting in a reduced void ratio and hydraulic conductivity.This trend was observed for untreated and chitosanamended soils.At 1% and 2%, the hydraulic conductivity increased by 1.74 times and 4.14 times compared to untreated soil.The increase in hydraulic conductivity in such low organic soils during the earlier curing period has been observed after amendment with nano calcium carbonate [76].Nano calcium carbonate and chitosan serve as fillers within the matrix of organic soils, leading to the agglomeration of particles.Dosages beyond 2% lead to a drop in the void spaces and hydraulic conductivity of the chitosan-soil matrix.The addition of a dosage beyond the optimum facilitates cluster formations between soil lumps causing the blockage of the flow path.The blockage created within the structure resulted in a decrease in the rate of pore water expulsion, causing a dip in the coefficient of consolidation and hydraulic conductivity for the 4% dosage.Another factor responsible for the reduction in the value of the coefficient of consolidation is the hydrophilic nature of the chitosan, which holds the pore water and does not allow it to expel out, leading to decreased k values.

Shrinkage Phenomena in Chitosan-Soil Mix
The samples for the different dosages were prepared at the liquid limit.The liquid limit was conducted as per ASTM D4318-17e1 [59].The values of liquid limits were estimated as 55.73%, 58.50%, 64.64%, 68.85%, and 68.82% for 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4% of chitosan.The addition of chitosan leads to the modification of the electrical double layer and specific area of kaolinite by creating interparticle voids.This phenomenon increases the volume of water held in the soil matrix, leading to an increase in the liquid limit [56].The soil prepared for shrinkage tests were subjected to drying by exposing to natural conditions, leading to a volume change.The performance of soil during the shrinkage process can be evaluated by considering the change in length, amount of lift, or surface characteristics, such as the curling or cracking of the samples [77].The linear shrinkage for the untreated soil is estimated to be 14.18%.The reduction in moisture content led to a reduction in height and detachment of the sample from the sides of the mold.The test setup for observing the shrinkage phenomena is presented in Figure 10.   3. Following the detachment from the mold, the samples started to shrink in all directions.The deformation was higher in the longitudinal direction for all the treated samples.The lowest shrinkage was noted for the highest dosage (4%) adopted for the study.The untreated and treated samples did not exhibit any curling or cracking during the process of shrinkage.

Environmental Impact of Chitosan
The environmental impact of a material has to be assessed from cradle to grave.Due to the escalating global warming crisis, it is important to ascertain the contribution of any civil engineering material or work to climate change issues.Since its inception, any material plays an important role in the release of greenhouse gases.In this regard, chitosan has been resourced from marine waste, ensuring its recyclability.Previous studies have proved that chitosan's contribution to the carbon footprint is much lesser than traditional chemical materials such as cement and lime [71].Contrary to the detrimental effects on flora and fauna by chemical stabilizers, chitosan has been shown to promote vegetation effectively and sustain microbial life within the soil [78,79].Chitosan can thus be a promising alternative to chemical stabilizers for soft soil amelioration from a geotechnical and environmental point of view.

Recommended Application from the Results
The hydraulic conductivity of the liner is a significant parameter in the selection of liner material.Due to the non-availability of low permeable soils, soil amendment becomes imperative for achieving the desired properties of a liner.The performance of a liner requires the assessment of the hydro-mechanical behavior of a material [80].The current study evaluated the efficacy of a polysaccharide biopolymer named chitosan in addressing the compressibility and desiccation cracking of amended clayey soil.Chitosanamended soils have modified the soil fabric to achieve reduced values of hydraulic conductivity [81].The hydraulic conductivity of the soil obtained at a 4% dosage is much less than that required for a landfill liner (10 −7 cm/s) [82].At all dosages, the hydraulic conductivity satisfied the minimum criteria to be fulfilled by the landfill liner.The evaporation of water in soil upon drying leads to volumetric shrinkage and differential movement, resulting in structural damage.In landfills, desiccation cracking will lead to the leakage of landfill liners and affect the integrity of the liner system.The promising results obtained from the shrinkage study revealed that desiccation cracking can be effectively controlled by the inclusion of chitosan.Thus, chitosan-amended soft soil can be recommended as a landfill liner.

Carbon Emissions Resulting from the Construction of a Landfill
A landfill is considered for the study to serve a community of one lakh population for a design period of 50 years.As shown in Figure 12, the landfill has a width of 600 m with a side slope of 1.5:1 below the ground level and 3:1 above the ground level.The compacted clay liner (CCL) at the base with a thickness of 1 m is provided and the liner in the soil cover is provided with 0.5 m thickness.From the preliminary results of the study, the soil was compacted to a uniform density of 1.48 g/cm 3 (or t/m 3 ), and a moisture content of 23.6% was added with a 2% dosage of chitosan.

Phase 1: Calculating Embodied Carbon Emissions from the Materials
The materials considered for the analysis included soil, chitosan, and the required quantity of water.The ECF values of these materials were taken from [67,68,[83][84][85] to indicate the embodied carbon emissions.The dimensions of the landfill were fixed based on the general design guidelines.Based on the dimensions, the volume of soil required for the construction of the landfill liner components was estimated.The weight of chitosan and water was estimated as a percentage of the total weight of the estimated soil quantity.The weights multiplied by the respective ECF values determined the carbon emissions contributed by soil, chitosan, and water.Table 4 displays the values of Phase 1 carbon emissions.The calculations are presented in Appendix A. The second phase involves the quantification of carbon emissions from the material's acquisition and delivery to the site.The machines considered were a heavy-duty dumper with a 25 t/L capacity for hauling and a pickup excavator with a 10 t/L capacity for procurement.To make quantification easier, the to and fro haulage distance was set at 1 km.The gasoline needed for these cars, which was derived from [84,86,87], had its ECF values taken into account.The values of the embodied carbon emissions caused by the material's acquisition and transportation are shown in Table 5.The hauling distance, vehicle capacities, and fuel types utilized by the vehicles had a significant impact on the emissions from this phase.The site operations contributing to the carbon emissions were considered and analyzed in Phase 3. A bulldozer with a 10 t/L capacity for spreading soil, a slurry mixer with a 0.5-t capacity for mixing chitosan, a distributor truck with a 7000 L capacity for spraying chitosan, a sheep foot roller with a 12 t/L capacity for compacting soil in the baseliner, a smooth wheel roller with a 12 t/L capacity for compacting the final cover, and a slope compactor roller with a 9 t/L capacity for compacting soil in the side liner were considered in the analysis.Table 6 presents the carbon emissions evaluated during Phase 3. The vehicle capacities and the number of trips affected the total carbon emissions in Phase 3, similar to Phase 2. The calculations and total carbon emissions from all three phases are reported in Appendix A and Table 7, respectively.With optimal dosages of 4% and 6%, respectively, the carbon emissions for the planned landfill with cement and lime employed as amendments were studied; these emissions are presented in Table 8 [88,89].Phase 1 alone was considered to make a direct comparison.Only Phase 1 was taken into consideration for the comparison to consider the impact of the various materials.Phases 2 and 3 were omitted for comparison because of the influencing factors, such as the vehicle capacity, fuel type, and haulage distance.As indicated in Figure 13, the carbon emissions with 4% cement and 6% lime contributed 45.376% and 54.451% of the total emissions, respectively, whereas chitosan provided 0.173%.The ECF values of lime and cement were found to be 0.76 and 0.95, respectively [67,68].

Conclusions
The utilization of marine waste in enhancing the engineering properties of soft soil deposits is gaining popularity as it addresses the issue of waste management and disposal and negates harmful effects on the environment.The following conclusions are drawn from the study, which evaluated the consolidation characteristics, shrinkage phenomenon, and sustainability factor of chitosan-treated soft soil:  The role of chitosan as a flocculating agent caused the flocculation of soil particles and reduced the overall surface area of the soil, and decreased the void ratio by 70% up to an optimum of 2%.The untreated and treated soils exhibited negligible swelling upon unloading at a load decrement ratio of 4.


The addition of chitosan quickened the consolidation process by allowing for easy pore water expulsion by seven times compared to untreated soil up to a 2% dosage, owing to its non-cohesive nature.


With a dosage more than the optimum, flow paths are blocked due to the formation of clusters aggravated by the presence of chitosan fillers, thus resulting in a decrease in pore water expulsion that, in turn, decreased the value of the coefficient of consolidation and hydraulic conductivity  The inclusion of chitosan in soil showed tremendous improvement in the reduction in shrinkage.The untreated and treated samples did not exhibit desiccation cracking and a maximum reduction in shrinkage by 11% was achieved with a 4% dosage.


The CFA carried out for a typical landfill liner revealed that the addition of chitosan to the studied soil can reduce the associated carbon emissions by 8.754 and 7.325 times compared to traditional stabilizers like lime and cement, respectively.
The amelioration of soft soil with chitosan is a promising alternative to other chemical stabilizers and biopolymers as it accelerates the consolidation process in addition to being environmentally friendly.Additionally, chitosan has proven its efficacy in controlling desiccation cracking.The sustainability assessment of chitosan-amended soft soil revealed that the carbon footprint can be significantly reduced and can easily replace the other stabilizers employed in ground improvement works.The only limitation is the high cost of chitosan (1300 Rs/kg), which can be solved by expanding the market through widespread implementation.One of the main reasons for the increased rate of chitosan is due to limited application in the geotechnical engineering field compared to other fields such as medicine, cosmetics, and the food industry.Due to the promising results observed in the current study, this amendment can be applied to liner systems built in any geoenvironmental application involving soft soil.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Particle size distribution for the soil.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Consolidation procedure undertaken for the study.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of chitosan inclusion on the volume change behavior.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Variation in compression index with an increase in dosage of chitosan.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Variation in swelling index with an increase in dosage of chitosan.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Variation in coefficient of consolidation with an increase in dosage of chitosan.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Variation in hydraulic conductivity with an increase in dosage of chitosan.

Figure 11
Figure 11  displays the shrinkage phenomena captured for the untreated and chitosan-treated samples.The treatment with chitosan led to a reduction in the linear shrinkage of the soil samples as indicated in Table3.Following the detachment from the mold, the samples started to shrink in all directions.The deformation was higher in the longitudinal direction for all the treated samples.The lowest shrinkage was noted for the highest

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Schematic diagram of landfill with CCL treated with chitosan.

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.Comparison of carbon emission of chitosan with lime and cement.

Table 1 .
Index and geotechnical properties of studied soil.

Table 2 .
Effect of different biopolymers on the compressibility index of kaolinite soils.

Table 7 .
Total embodied carbon emissions from the three phases considered.

Table 8 .
Embodied carbon emission comparison of chitosan with lime and cement.

Embodied carbon emissions from Phase 2 (Procurement and Haulage)
.A pickup excavator of 10 t/L capacity for procurement and a heavy-duty dumper of 25 t/L capacity for haulage were considered.The haulage distance was considered to be 1 km (to and fro) for easy quantification.

emitted from Phase 2 318,877.00 t Embodied carbon emissions from Phase 3 (Site operations)
.A bulldozer of 10 t/L capacity for spreading soil, a distributor truck of 7000 L capacity for spraying chitosan, a sheep foot roller of 12 t/L capacity for compaction of the base liner, a slope compactor roller of 9 t/L capacity for compaction of side slopes both above and below ground level, and a smooth wheel roller of 12 t/L capacity for compaction of soil on the final cover were considered.