Hardening Embrittlement and Non-Hardening Embrittlement of Welding-Heat-Affected Zones in a Cr-Mo Low Alloy Steel

The embrittlement of heat affected zones (HAZs) resulting from the welding of a P-doped 2.25Cr-1Mo steel was studied by the analysis of the fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs simulated under a heat input of 45 kJ/cm with different peak temperatures. The FATTs of the HAZs both with and without tempering increased with the rise of the peak temperature. However, the FATTs were apparently lower for the tempered HAZs. For the as-welded (untempered) HAZs, the FATTs were mainly affected by residual stress, martensite/austenite (M/A) islands, and bainite morphology. The observed embrittlement is a hardening embrittlement. On the other hand, the FATTs of the tempered HAZs were mainly affected by phosphorus grain boundary segregation, thereby causing a non-hardening embrittlement. The results demonstrate that the hardening embrittlement of the as-welded HAZs was more severe than the non-hardening embrittlement of the tempered HAZs. Consequently, a post-weld heat treatment should be carried out if possible so as to eliminate the hardening embrittlement.


Introduction
2.25Cr-1Mo steel, with a high temperature creep resistance, is one of the most important Cr-Mo low alloy steels, and is widely used in the power industry, where high temperatures and pressures are involved [1].Owing to the high capacity of power plants, the pressure vessel should be made of the steel with a thick wall.Therefore, a high heat input welding needs to be employed to ensure high efficiency during the manufacturing of pressure vessels [2].Unfortunately, the embrittlement of the weld joint induced by high heat input welding is a serious problem [2,3].The performance of the fusion zone may be improved by metallurgy during welding, but this is impossible for the heat-affected zone (HAZ) [4].Consequently, close attention should be paid to the embrittlement of HAZs in 2.25Cr-1Mo steel.
The combined hardening and non-hardening embrittlement of interstitial-free steel has been investigated in a previous study [5].The research shows that the brittleness of the steel is related to its yield strength, grain size and the grain boundary segregation of impurity atoms.In addition, a recent investigation concerning the embrittlement of quenched and tempered 2.25Cr-1Mo steel [6] demonstrated that the fracture appearance transition temperature (FATT) of the steel was directly correlated to the yield strength and impurity grain boundary segregation.The prior austenite grain size was not directly linked to the FATT, but it influenced both the yield strength and impurity grain boundary segregation.It can be reasonably anticipated that the embrittlement of HAZs is in correlation to hardening, microstructure coarsening and impurity boundary segregation, which could be affected by the welding thermal cycle and the subsequent service condition [2,[7][8][9][10][11]. Hence, the toughness of HAZs could be deteriorated by both hardening embrittlement and non-hardening embrittlement.Hardening embrittlement is caused by hardening, such as strain hardening, solid solution hardening, and precipitation hardening, which increases with the increasing yield strength of the material.Non-hardening embrittlement is induced by the grain boundary segregation of some impurities such as P, Sb, Sn and As.This embrittlement becomes more and more serious with the enhancement of the impurity grain boundary segregation.
Some studies have indicated that the peak temperature of the welding thermal cycle is related to the distance from the HAZ to the fusion line [8,[12][13][14].Hence, there should be different combinations of microstructure, residual stress, grain size, and impurity boundary segregation in the HAZs at different positions.The objective of the present work is to systematically study the toughness deteriorations of as-welded and tempered HAZs in a 2.25Cr-1Mo steel, simulated with a constant high input but with different peak temperatures.The embrittlement mechanisms will be clarified by analyzing the microstructures, hardness, and phosphorus segregation of the HAZs.

Experimental Procedure
The experimental steel was prepared by vacuum induction melting and the ingot (50 kg) was hot rolled into a plate 16 mm in thickness.The chemical composition of the steel is shown in Table 1.Blocks with a size of 12 mm × 12 mm × 75 mm were machined from the plate, and then austenitized at 960 • C and oil quenched, followed by tempering for 2 h at 650 • C. Therefore, the material had the unified microstructure of tempered martensite before weld thermal cycling.After the above heat treatment, all blocks were machined into specimens with a size of 11 mm × 11 mm × 70 mm for subsequent welding thermal simulations.A Gleeble-1500D thermal simulator was employed to simulate the welding thermal cycles with a fixed heat input of 45 kJ/cm at several peak temperatures (1000 • C, 1100 • C, 1200 • C, and 1320 • C).This heat input was used to characterize the submerged arc welding [2], and the different peak temperatures were selected to simulate different distinct regions of the HAZ [8].Although the thermal simulation is hard to simulate due to the temperature gradient in a HAZ, it is still an optimal method to study some local regions of the HAZ.The thermal cycling simulations were performed according to the Rokalin-two dimension mode and the obtained thermal curves are shown in Figure 1.As can be seen, when the heat input was fixed, the thermal cycles almost had the same cooling rate, i.e., the cooling times from 800 to 500 • C (t 8/5 ) were all approximately 27 s under different peak temperatures.After the thermal simulations, half of the specimens were tempered for 800 h at 520 • C.
The metallographic structures of the HAZs were observed after polishing and chemical etching.The average grain sizes were determined by the linear intercept method.A Vickers hardness tester was employed to measure the hardness of the specimens.
A grain boundary microanalysis was performed with the use of a field emission gun scanning transmission electron microscope (FEGSTEM, JEM-2100F, JOEL CO., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Oxford INCA, Oxford, UK). Figure 2 shows a typical image of a grain boundary analyzed by FEGSTEM-EDS.Obviously, there was no precipitate present around the grain boundary and meanwhile the incident electron beam was well parallel to the boundary, which is necessary for grain boundary microanalysis.However, as the special resolution of FEGSTEM-EDS (often greater than 2 nm [15]) rarely approximates the grain boundary thickness (less than 1 nm [16]), the measured result should be a convolution value of the actual compositional distribution near the grain boundary.For this reason, the measured results were corrected by a convolution method and the details of the correction for the measured values can be seen elsewhere [17][18][19].
Metals 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 12 (less than 1 nm [16]), the measured result should be a convolution value of the actual compositional distribution near the grain boundary.For this reason, the measured results were corrected by a convolution method and the details of the correction for the measured values can be seen elsewhere [17][18][19].The fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs were determined by Charpy impact tests combined with fracture appearance observations with the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI S4700, Tokyo, Japan).The mini-Charpy specimens, 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm × 55 mm in dimension, with a 0.8 mm-deep sharp V-notch were adopted to measure the FATTs.The V-notches were located in the simulated HAZs.The mini-Charpy impact test was performed at different temperatures and the FATT was determined by analyzing the fracture surfaces, which corresponds to 50% brittle fracture.For each FATT, about 16 specimens were used.(less than 1 nm [16]), the measured result should be a convolution value of the actual compositional distribution near the grain boundary.For this reason, the measured results were corrected by a convolution method and the details of the correction for the measured values can be seen elsewhere [17][18][19].The fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs were determined by Charpy impact tests combined with fracture appearance observations with the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI S4700, Tokyo, Japan).The mini-Charpy specimens, 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm × 55 mm in dimension, with a 0.8 mm-deep sharp V-notch were adopted to measure the FATTs.The V-notches were located in the simulated HAZs.The mini-Charpy impact test was performed at different temperatures and the FATT was determined by analyzing the fracture surfaces, which corresponds to 50% brittle fracture.For each FATT, about 16 specimens were used.The fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs were determined by Charpy impact tests combined with fracture appearance observations with the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI S4700, Tokyo, Japan).The mini-Charpy specimens, 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm × 55 mm in dimension, with a 0.8 mm-deep sharp V-notch were adopted to measure the FATTs.The V-notches were located in the simulated HAZs.The mini-Charpy impact test was performed at different temperatures and the FATT was determined by analyzing the fracture surfaces, which corresponds to 50% brittle fracture.For each FATT, about 16 specimens were used.

Microstructure and Hardness
Figure 3 shows the metallographs of the as-welded and tempered HAZs simulated with different peak temperatures.Figure 3a,c,e,g correspond to the as-welded specimens simulated with the peak temperatures of 1000 • C, 1100 • C, 1200 • C, 1320 • C, respectively.The corresponding tempered microstructures are shown in Figure 3b,d,f,h, respectively.As can be seen, the microstructures of the as-welded HAZs consisted of allotriomorphic ferrite (AF), granular bainite (GB) and lath bainite (LB), while some of the bainite dissolved into the matrix after tempering.There was more granular bainite in the HAZs with lower peak temperatures (1000 • C and 1100 • C), whereas the lath bainite was preferentially formed in the as-welded HAZs with higher peak temperatures (1200 • C and 1320 • C).Nevertheless, the tempered HAZs almost had a uniform microstructure no matter how high the peak temperature.

Microstructure and Hardness
Figure 3 shows the metallographs of the as-welded and tempered HAZs simulated with different peak temperatures.Figure 3a,c,e,g correspond to the as-welded specimens simulated with the peak temperatures of 1000 °C, 1100 °C, 1200 °C, 1320 °C, respectively.The corresponding tempered microstructures are shown in Figure 3b,d,f,h, respectively.As can be seen, the microstructures of the as-welded HAZs consisted of allotriomorphic ferrite (AF), granular bainite (GB) and lath bainite (LB), while some of the bainite dissolved into the matrix after tempering.There was more granular bainite in the HAZs with lower peak temperatures (1000 °C and 1100 °C), whereas the lath bainite was preferentially formed in the as-welded HAZs with higher peak temperatures (1200 °C and 1320 °C).Nevertheless, the tempered HAZs almost had a uniform microstructure no matter how high the peak temperature.Figure 4 shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) morphologies of the as-welded and tempered HAZs with different peak temperatures.The specimen condition for each image in Figure 4 is the same as that in Figure 3.A study by Zheng et al. [2] confirmed the existence of martensite/austenite (M/A) islands in coarse-grained HAZs with some high heat inputs (36-60 kJ/cm) for 2.25Cr-1Mo steel.The TEM morphologies of the M/A islands were in accordance with those shown in Figure 4a,c,e,g.It was found that the M/A islands became bigger when the welding thermal cycle had a higher peak temperature.On the other hand, all the M/A islands disappeared after tempering for 800 h at 520 °C, as shown in Figure 4b,d,f,h.Meanwhile, some fine carbide particles precipitated from the matrix in the tempered HAZs. Figure 4 shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) morphologies of the as-welded and tempered HAZs with different peak temperatures.The specimen condition for each image in Figure 4 is the same as that in Figure 3.A study by Zheng et al. [2] confirmed the existence of martensite/austenite (M/A) islands in coarse-grained HAZs with some high heat inputs (36-60 kJ/cm) for 2.25Cr-1Mo steel.The TEM morphologies of the M/A islands were in accordance with those shown in Figure 4a,c,e,g.It was found that the M/A islands became bigger when the welding thermal cycle had a higher peak temperature.On the other hand, all the M/A islands disappeared after tempering for 800 h at 520 • C, as shown in Figure 4b,d,f,h.Meanwhile, some fine carbide particles precipitated from the matrix in the tempered HAZs. Figure 4 shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) morphologies of the as-welded and tempered HAZs with different peak temperatures.The specimen condition for each image in Figure 4 is the same as that in Figure 3.A study by Zheng et al. [2] confirmed the existence of martensite/austenite (M/A) islands in coarse-grained HAZs with some high heat inputs (36-60 kJ/cm) for 2.25Cr-1Mo steel.The TEM morphologies of the M/A islands were in accordance with those shown in Figure 4a,c,e,g.It was found that the M/A islands became bigger when the welding thermal cycle had a higher peak temperature.On the other hand, all the M/A islands disappeared after tempering for 800 h at 520 °C, as shown in Figure 4b,d,f,h.Meanwhile, some fine carbide particles precipitated from the matrix in the tempered HAZs.Previous investigations indicated that the prior austenite grain size of some low alloy steels was related to its austenitizing temperature [20][21][22].In the same way, the grain size of the HAZ could be affected by the peak temperature during the welding thermal cycle [14].Figure 5 shows the metallographs of HAZs prepared after grain boundary etching.Clearly, the prior austenite grain size increased with the rise of the peak temperature, which were, as determined by the linear intercept method, approximately 9 μm, 18 μm, 40 μm, and 59 μm for the peak temperatures of 1000 °C, 1100 °C, 1200 °C, and 1320 °C, respectively.Previous investigations indicated that the prior austenite grain size of some low alloy steels was related to its austenitizing temperature [20][21][22].In the same way, the grain size of the HAZ could be affected by the peak temperature during the welding thermal cycle [14].Figure 5 shows the metallographs of HAZs prepared after grain boundary etching.Clearly, the prior austenite grain size increased with the rise of the peak temperature, which were, as determined by the linear intercept method, approximately 9 µm, 18 µm, 40 µm, and 59 µm for the peak temperatures of 1000  Previous investigations indicated that the prior austenite grain size of some low alloy steels was related to its austenitizing temperature [20][21][22].In the same way, the grain size of the HAZ could be affected by the peak temperature during the welding thermal cycle [14].Figure 5 shows the metallographs of HAZs prepared after grain boundary etching.Clearly, the prior austenite grain size increased with the rise of the peak temperature, which were, as determined by the linear intercept method, approximately 9 μm, 18 μm, 40 μm, and 59 μm for the peak temperatures of 1000 °C, 1100 °C, 1200 °C, and 1320 °C, respectively.Table 2 shows the Vickers hardness values of the as-welded and tempered HAZs simulated with different peak temperatures.It is obvious that the hardness is independent of the peak temperature for both the as-welded and tempered HAZs.In general, the welding residual stress, grain size, and microstructure could have affected the hardness of the HAZs.Although the welding residual stress, the proportion of lath bainite, the prior austenite grain size as well as the M/A island size all increased with the increasing peak temperature, they had different effects on the hardness of the HAZs.Firstly, the residual stress was positively related to the hardness [10,23].Secondly, the lath bainite had a higher dislocation density compared to the granular bainite, so that the lath bainite was a harder phase [24,25].Thirdly, according to the Hall-Petch relation [26,27], the finer grains yielded a higher strength, leading to a higher hardness.Finally, the M/A islands, which acted like precipitates, influenced the hardness by means of the precipitation hardening mechanism.A previous study showed that the precipitation strengthening effect decreased with increasing precipitate size if the precipitate radius was large enough (>10 nm) [28].Therefore, the finer the M/A islands, the stronger the precipitation hardening effect in the HAZs.In summary, the welding residual stress and lath bainite had positive effects, while the grain and M/A island sizes had a negative influence on the hardness of the HAZs.From this point of view, the hardness of the HAZs without tempering could be kept constant under the combined influence of these factors.On the other hand, the residual stress can be relieved during tempering.Besides, the M/A islands were almost fully dissolved in the tempered HAZs (see Figure 4).However, the grain size increased apparently with increasing peak temperature (see Figure 5) and the lath structure was faintly visible in the HAZs with higher peak temperatures (see Figure 3).As the effects of these two factors on the hardness were opposite, the hardness of the tempered HAZs also remained independent of the peak temperature.
Furthermore, the fact that the hardness values of the tempered HAZs were much lower than those of the untempered HAZs should be due to the disappearance of some hardening factors (residual stress, M/A islands, supersaturated dislocations) in the tempered HAZs.Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the difference in yield strength may be more remarkable than that in hardness for low alloy steels [5].Hence, the Vickers hardness is not a unique indication of the hardening (or strengthening) effect of the steel.Table 2 shows the Vickers hardness values of the as-welded and tempered HAZs simulated with different peak temperatures.It is obvious that the hardness is independent of the peak temperature for both the as-welded and tempered HAZs.In general, the welding residual stress, grain size, and microstructure could have affected the hardness of the HAZs.Although the welding residual stress, the proportion of lath bainite, the prior austenite grain size as well as the M/A island size all increased with the increasing peak temperature, they had different effects on the hardness of the HAZs.Firstly, the residual stress was positively related to the hardness [10,23].Secondly, the lath bainite had a higher dislocation density compared to the granular bainite, so that the lath bainite was a harder phase [24,25].Thirdly, according to the Hall-Petch relation [26,27], the finer grains yielded a higher strength, leading to a higher hardness.Finally, the M/A islands, which acted like precipitates, influenced the hardness by means of the precipitation hardening mechanism.A previous study showed that the precipitation strengthening effect decreased with increasing precipitate size if the precipitate radius was large enough (>10 nm) [28].Therefore, the finer the M/A islands, the stronger the precipitation hardening effect in the HAZs.In summary, the welding residual stress and lath bainite had positive effects, while the grain and M/A island sizes had a negative influence on the hardness of the HAZs.From this point of view, the hardness of the HAZs without tempering could be kept constant under the combined influence of these factors.On the other hand, the residual stress can be relieved during tempering.Besides, the M/A islands were almost fully dissolved in the tempered HAZs (see Figure 4).However, the grain size increased apparently with increasing peak temperature (see Figure 5) and the lath structure was faintly visible in the HAZs with higher peak temperatures (see Figure 3).As the effects of these two factors on the hardness were opposite, the hardness of the tempered HAZs also remained independent of the peak temperature.

Grain Boundary Segregation of Phosphorus
Furthermore, the fact that the hardness values of the tempered HAZs were much lower than those of the untempered HAZs should be due to the disappearance of some hardening factors (residual stress, M/A islands, supersaturated dislocations) in the tempered HAZs.Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the difference in yield strength may be more remarkable than that in hardness for low alloy steels [5].
Hence, the Vickers hardness is not a unique indication of the hardening (or strengthening) effect of the steel.

Grain Boundary Segregation of Phosphorus
The analysis results of phosphorus grain boundary segregation in the HAZs are illustrated in Figure 6.As can be seen, the segregation concentrations in the tempered HAZs were much higher than those in the untempered HAZs.A study by Zheng et al. [18] showed that the phosphorus segregation during the welding thermal cycle was not apparent due to the very short cooling time.The segregation in the untempered HAZs was mainly non-equilibrium segregation and increased somewhat with the increasing welding peak temperature, as shown in Figure 6 [29].In contrast, the segregation in the tempered HAZs reached equilibrium after the long-term treatment (800 h) at 520 • C [30].The equilibrium segregation level usually increased with the increasing grain size [31] and normally the equilibrium segregation at lower temperatures was much larger than the non-equilibrium segregation (see Figure 6).The analysis results of phosphorus grain boundary segregation in the HAZs are illustrated in Figure 6.As can be seen, the segregation concentrations in the tempered HAZs were much higher than those in the untempered HAZs.A study by Zheng et al. [18] showed that the phosphorus segregation during the welding thermal cycle was not apparent due to the very short cooling time.The segregation in the untempered HAZs was mainly non-equilibrium segregation and increased somewhat with the increasing welding peak temperature, as shown in Figure 6 [29].In contrast, the segregation in the tempered HAZs reached equilibrium after the long-term treatment (800 h) at 520 °C [30].The equilibrium segregation level usually increased with the increasing grain size [31] and normally the equilibrium segregation at lower temperatures was much larger than the non-equilibrium segregation (see Figure 6).

Hardening Embrittlement and Non-Hardening Embrittlement of As-Welded and Tempered HAZs
The fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs are shown in Figure 7.As seen, the FATT increased with the increasing peak temperature for both the as-welded and tempered HAZs.Besides, the FATTs of the as-welded HAZs were always higher than those of the tempered HAZs for the same peak temperature.

Hardening Embrittlement and Non-Hardening Embrittlement of As-Welded and Tempered HAZs
The fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs are shown in Figure 7.As seen, the FATT increased with the increasing peak temperature for both the as-welded and tempered HAZs.Besides, the FATTs of the as-welded HAZs were always higher than those of the tempered HAZs for the same peak temperature.
For the as-welded (untempered) HAZs, the FATTs were mainly affected by the microstructure and welding residual stress.It has been reported that the lattice mismatch between the M/A island and the surrounding ferrite matrix acts as an initiation of the stress concentration when the steel suffers from an impact load [32,33].Moreover, the high welding residual stress was another cause for the deterioration of the toughness [10].In contrast, the opposite influence of the grain coarsening on the toughness of the HAZs was rather weak.Consequently, the FATT had the same variation tendency with the M/A size and residual stress in the as-welded HAZs.The embrittlement mechanism can be reflected by the fracture appearance.The fractographs in Figure 8 show the fracture surface of an as-welded HAZ broken by impact at the temperature close to its FATT.As seen, the brittle part of the fracture was absolutely the cleavage type, indicating that the embrittlement was mainly in connection with some strain barriers.Therefore, the toughness of the as-welded HAZ deteriorated mainly due to hardening embrittlement.

Hardening Embrittlement and Non-Hardening Embrittlement of As-Welded and Tempered HAZs
The fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the HAZs are shown in Figure 7.As seen, the FATT increased with the increasing peak temperature for both the as-welded and tempered HAZs.Besides, the FATTs of the as-welded HAZs were always higher than those of the tempered HAZs for the same peak temperature.For the as-welded (untempered) HAZs, the FATTs were mainly affected by the microstructure and welding residual stress.It has been reported that the lattice mismatch between the M/A island and the surrounding ferrite matrix acts as an initiation of the stress concentration when the steel suffers from an impact load [32,33].Moreover, the high welding residual stress was another cause for the deterioration of the toughness [10].In contrast, the opposite influence of the grain coarsening on the toughness of the HAZs was rather weak.Consequently, the FATT had the same variation tendency with the M/A size and residual stress in the as-welded HAZs.The embrittlement mechanism can be reflected by the fracture appearance.The fractographs in Figure 8 show the fracture surface of an as-welded HAZ broken by impact at the temperature close to its FATT.As seen, the brittle part of the fracture was absolutely the cleavage type, indicating that the embrittlement was mainly in connection with some strain barriers.Therefore, the toughness of the as-welded HAZ deteriorated mainly due to hardening embrittlement.For the tempered HAZs, the FATTs were mainly affected by the grain boundary segregation of phosphorus.After tempering, the residual stress and some microstructures that were detrimental to the toughness were removed.Hence, the embrittlement of the tempered HAZs originated mainly from the grain boundary segregation of phosphorus.It is well known that the segregation of phosphorus can weaken grain boundaries and lead to the intergranular embrittlement of some low alloy steels [34,35].This embrittlement mechanism could be verified from the fractographs shown in Figure 9.It is obvious that the brittle part of the tempered HAZ fracture surface belonged to the For the tempered HAZs, the FATTs were mainly affected by the grain boundary segregation of phosphorus.After tempering, the residual stress and some microstructures that were detrimental to the toughness were removed.Hence, the embrittlement of the tempered HAZs originated mainly from the grain boundary segregation of phosphorus.It is well known that the segregation of phosphorus can weaken grain boundaries and lead to the intergranular embrittlement of some low alloy steels [34,35].This embrittlement mechanism could be verified from the fractographs shown in Figure 9.It is obvious that the brittle part of the tempered HAZ fracture surface belonged to the intergranular mode, which was different from that of the as-welded HAZs, as shown in Figure 8. Consequently, the embrittlement of the tempered HAZs was mainly non-hardening embrittlement.
Furthermore, Figure 7 illustrates that the embrittlement of the as-welded HAZs was much more serious than that of the tempered HAZs in each case.This means that the hardening embrittlement caused by some harmful microstructures (M/A islands and lath bainite) plays a dominant role in deteriorating the toughness of the HAZs for the 2.25Cr-1Mo low alloy steel.Therefore, if possible, a post-weld heat treatment should be conducted before service to enhance the toughness of the steel.

Conclusions
Hardening embrittlement induced by some deleterious microstructures occurred in the as-welded (untempered) HAZs of the experimental 2.25Cr-1Mo steel.The fracture appearance transition temperature (FATT) of the as-welded HAZs increased with the increasing peak temperature, which was mainly attributed to the coarsening of the M/A islands and the increasing of the lath bainite.On the other hand, the deterioration of the toughness of the tempered HAZ results were mainly from the grain boundary segregation of phosphorus and thus it belonged to non-hardening embrittlement.Moreover, the hardening embrittlement of the HAZs was apparently more severe than the non-hardening embrittlement.Therefore, a post-weld heat treatment is necessary for the secure service of the steel.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Thermal curves with different peak temperatures.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. FEGSTEM image showing a typical grain boundary analyzed.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Thermal curves with different peak temperatures.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Thermal curves with different peak temperatures.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. FEGSTEM image showing a typical grain boundary analyzed.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. FEGSTEM image showing a typical grain boundary analyzed.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Phosphorus grain boundary segregation concentrations in the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures, determined by FEGSTEM-EDS microanalysis (error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Phosphorus grain boundary segregation concentrations in the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures, determined by FEGSTEM-EDS microanalysis (error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Phosphorus grain boundary segregation concentrations in the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures, determined by FEGSTEM-EDS microanalysis (error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Fracture appearance transition temperatures (FATTs) of the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Fractographs of the as-welded HAZ obtained with a peak temperature of 1320 °C and broken by impact at −20 °C: (a) the whole section; (b) the local ductile part; (c) the local mixed brittle-ductile part; and (d) the local brittle part.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Fractographs of the as-welded HAZ obtained with a peak temperature of 1320 • C and broken by impact at −20 • C: (a) the whole section; (b) the local ductile part; (c) the local mixed brittle-ductile part; and (d) the local brittle part.

Metals 2018, 8 ,
x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 12 caused by some harmful microstructures (M/A islands and lath bainite) plays a dominant role in deteriorating the toughness of the HAZs for the 2.25Cr-1Mo low alloy steel.Therefore, if possible, a post-weld heat treatment should be conducted before service to enhance the toughness of the steel.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Fractographs of the tempered HAZ obtained with a peak temperature of 1320 °C and broken by impact at −45 °C: (a) the whole section; (b) the local brittle part; (c) the local mixed brittle-ductile part; and (d) the local ductile part.

Table 1 .
The chemical composition of the experimental 2.25Cr-1Mo steel.

Table 2 .
Vickers hardness values of the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures.

Table 2 .
Vickers hardness values of the as-welded and tempered heat-affected zones obtained with different peak temperatures.