A Method for Predicting the Effects of Specimen Geometry and Loading Condition on Fatigue Strength

Specimen geometry and loading condition usually have a great influence on the fatigue strength of metallic materials, which is an important issue in evaluating the reliability of component parts. In this paper, a rotating bending fatigue test is performed at first on an hourglass specimen and a notch specimen of a high strength titanium alloy. Experimental results indicate that, in terms of local stress, the notch specimen endures higher fatigue strength in comparison with the hourglass specimen due to its relatively smaller control volume. Then, a probabilistic control volume method is proposed for correlating the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength based on Weibull distribution and the concept of control volume. A simple formula is obtained for the fatigue strength in relation to control volumes, in which the parameter is the shape parameter of Weibull distribution of fatigue strength. The predicted results are in good agreement with the present experimental data for high strength titanium alloy and the data for the high strength steel and the full scale EA4T axle in the literature.


Introduction
The effects of specimen size, notch geometry, and loading condition on fatigue behavior of metallic materials are important topics in the fatigue research field, which is of great importance in evaluating the fatigue strength of structure components.
Much research has been carried out on the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on fatigue behavior of metallic materials [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].For example, Furuya [9] investigated the effect of specimen size on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of high strength steels, and showed that large specimens endured lower fatigue strengths due to the appearance of larger inclusions in control volumes (risk volumes).Kuguel [10] introduced a highly stressed volume method for predicting the fatigue strength of notched specimens.In this method, the fatigue notch factor K f and the elastic stress concentration factor K t were correlated by K f /K t = (V n /V s ) a , where V n and V s were volumes (the region no less than 95% of the maximum stress) for the notched and smooth specimens, respectively, and a was a material constant determined by fitting the fatigue strength and the highly stressed volume.Lin & Lee [11] studied the effect of highly stressed volume on the fatigue strength of austempered ductile irons under rotating bending and axial loading fatigue tests, and showed that the highly stressed volume method was able to predict the effects of notch and loading condition on fatigue strength.Leitner et al. [12] investigated the statistical size effects on the fatigue strength of notched electroslag remelted 50CrMo4 steel components under uniaxial and multi-axial loadings.It was indicated that the highly stressed surface concept might be preferably applied in case of surface failure modes, while for the highly stressed volume concept, an upper threshold value was needed in advance x depth from the surface k shape parameter of Weibull distribution χ relative stress gradient K t stress concentration factor γ location parameter of Weibull distribution N number of cycles to failure λ scale parameter of Weibull distribution N 0 number of cycles at the knee point σ stress N f number of cycles to failure σ a stress amplitude N k number of cycles to failure, k = 1, 2, . . ., n σ A fatigue strength of specimen A N k a given number of cycles to failure σ B fatigue strength of specimen B n number of specimens σ C fatigue strength of referring specimen C n A integer part of V A /V C σ(x) maximum principle stress in depth x n B integer part of V B /V C σ k fatigue strength, k = 1, 2, . . ., n R stress ratio σ k fatigue strength S A control surface of specimen A σ max maximum principle stress at the surface S B control surface of specimen B

Experimental Material and Method
The material tested is a high strength titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-3Mo-X.The tensile strength is 1072 MPa, and the yield strength is 978 MPa.Two kinds of specimens are tested, as shown in Figure 1.One is the hourglass specimen, and the other the notch specimen.Before the fatigue test, the surface of the test section is ground and polished to eliminate the machine scratches.The elastic stress concentration factor K t is obtained by the finite element analysis, which is defined as the ratio of the maximum principal stress at the notch root to that of the smallest cross section area in smooth specimen (i.e., nominal stress).The local stress with depth under bending load for both the specimen types is shown in Figure 2. The relative stress gradient χ at the surface is calculated by χ = |dσ(x)/dx|/σ max [12,17], where σ(x) denotes the maximum principle stress in depth x from the surface of the notch root or the smallest cross section of the specimen, and σ max denotes the maximum principle stress at the surface.The values of χ at the surface for both the specimen types are calculated from a fourth order polynomial fit of the stress σ(x) and the depth x in Figure 2, which are 0.83 mm −1 for the hourglass specimen and 2.01 mm −1 for the notch specimen, respectively.= [12,17], where σ(x) denotes the maximum principle stress in depth x from the surface of the notch root or the smallest cross section of the specimen, and σmax denotes the maximum principle stress at the surface.The values of χ′ at the surface for both the specimen types are calculated from a fourth order polynomial fit of the stress σ(x) and the depth x in Figure 2, which are 0.83 mm −1 for the hourglass specimen and 2.01 mm −1 for the notch specimen, respectively.The fatigue test is conducted on a YRB200 rotating bending machine (Yamamoto Metal Technos Co., LTD., Osaka, Japan) at room temperature.The frequency is 50 Hz and the stress ratio R is −1.The fracture surfaces are observed by the JSM-IT300 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Experimental Results and Analysis
The stress-life (S-N) data of the two kinds of specimens are shown in Figure 3.It is seen that the notch has an important influence on the fatigue strength.For the same fatigue life, the notch specimen endures the higher local stress amplitude than that of the hourglass specimen, as shown in Figure 3b.This might be due to the fact that the control volume (the region subjected to no less than 90% of the = [12,17], where σ(x) denotes the maximum principle stress in depth x from the surface of the notch root or the smallest cross section of the specimen, and σmax denotes the maximum principle stress at the surface.The values of χ′ at the surface for both the specimen types are calculated from a fourth order polynomial fit of the stress σ(x) and the depth x in Figure 2, which are 0.83 mm −1 for the hourglass specimen and 2.01 mm −1 for the notch specimen, respectively.The fatigue test is conducted on a YRB200 rotating bending machine (Yamamoto Metal Technos Co., LTD., Osaka, Japan) at room temperature.The frequency is 50 Hz and the stress ratio R is −1.The fracture surfaces are observed by the JSM-IT300 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Experimental Results and Analysis
The stress-life (S-N) data of the two kinds of specimens are shown in Figure 3.It is seen that the notch has an important influence on the fatigue strength.For the same fatigue life, the notch specimen endures the higher local stress amplitude than that of the hourglass specimen, as shown in Figure 3b.This might be due to the fact that the control volume (the region subjected to no less than 90% of the The fatigue test is conducted on a YRB200 rotating bending machine (Yamamoto Metal Technos Co., LTD., Osaka, Japan) at room temperature.The frequency is 50 Hz and the stress ratio R is −1.The fracture surfaces are observed by the JSM-IT300 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Experimental Results and Analysis
The stress-life (S-N) data of the two kinds of specimens are shown in Figure 3.It is seen that the notch has an important influence on the fatigue strength.For the same fatigue life, the notch specimen endures the higher local stress amplitude than that of the hourglass specimen, as shown in Figure 3b.This might be due to the fact that the control volume (the region subjected to no less than 90% of the maximum principal stress [17][18][19] of the specimen) of the notch specimen is relative smaller than that of the hourglass specimen, which reduces the possibility of fatigue failure of the notch specimens.SEM observation indicates that all the hourglass and notch specimens fail from the specimen surface.For both hourglass and notch specimens, single-site crack initiation and multi-site crack initiation are observed at the fracture surface.Figures 4 and 5 show the SEM images of the fracture surface of several hourglass and notch specimens, respectively.SEM observation indicates that all the hourglass and notch specimens fail from the specimen surface.For both hourglass and notch specimens, single-site crack initiation and multi-site crack initiation are observed at the fracture surface.Figures 4 and 5 show the SEM images of the fracture surface of several hourglass and notch specimens, respectively.SEM observation indicates that all the hourglass and notch specimens fail from the specimen surface.For both hourglass and notch specimens, single-site crack initiation and multi-site crack initiation are observed at the fracture surface.Figures 4 and 5 show the SEM images of the fracture surface of several hourglass and notch specimens, respectively.

Method Construction
Considering that the fatigue crack generally initiates at the weakest spot in the most highly stressed region (i.e. the control volume) of specimens or components [17,18], it could be assumed that the fatigue strength is dominated by this stress region.So, a normal specimen A is seen to be composed of a number of reference specimen Cs with very small control volume under the same production procedure through control volume and the fatigue strength of specimen A at a certain fatigue life is taken as the minimum value of the fatigue strength among nA specimen C under the same fatigue life similar to the Weibull weakest-link method, where nA is an integer part of the ratio of VA/VC, VA and VC are control volumes for specimen A and specimen C, respectively.
Further, it is assumed that the fatigue strength C  of the referring specimen C under a certain fatigue life follows Weibull distribution, i.e.
where 0   is the scale parameter, 0 k  is the shape parameter and 0   is the location parameter.
Thus, the cumulative distribution function of the fatigue strength A  for specimen A under the same fatigue life satisfies

Method Construction
Considering that the fatigue crack generally initiates at the weakest spot in the most highly stressed region (i.e., the control volume) of specimens or components [17,18], it could be assumed that the fatigue strength is dominated by this stress region.So, a normal specimen A is seen to be composed of a number of reference specimen Cs with very small control volume under the same production procedure through control volume and the fatigue strength of specimen A at a certain fatigue life is taken as the minimum value of the fatigue strength among n A specimen C under the same fatigue life similar to the Weibull weakest-link method, where n A is an integer part of the ratio of V A /V C , V A and V C are control volumes for specimen A and specimen C, respectively.
Further, it is assumed that the fatigue strength σ C of the referring specimen C under a certain fatigue life follows Weibull distribution, i.e., where λ > 0 is the scale parameter, k > 0 is the shape parameter and γ ≥ 0 is the location parameter.Thus, the cumulative distribution function of the fatigue strength σ A for specimen A under the same fatigue life satisfies Metals 2018, 8, 811 6 of 13 From Equations ( 1) and ( 2), at the same survival probability, we have From Equation (3), the fatigue strength of specimen A and that of specimen C at the same survival probability satisfy Similarly, for the specimen B with control volume V B , the fatigue strength σ B and that of the referring specimen C at the same survival probability satisfy where n B is an integer part of V B /V C presenting the ratio of the control volume of specimen B to that of specimen C. Considering that the control volume of the referring specimen C is assumed to be very small (e.g., 0.1 mm 3 , 0.01 mm 3 ), we have From Equations ( 4)-( 6), we have the relation for the fatigue strength of specimens with different control volumes at the same survival probability, i.e., For the surface induced fatigue failure, it might be more appropriate to take the critical part of the specimen surface (i.e., control surface) with a certain thickness h (e.g., the magnitude of several grains) [19].In this case, Equation (7) becomes where S A and S B denote the control surface of specimen A and specimen B, respectively.As a special case, for the two-parameter Weibull distribution, i.e., the location parameter γ = 0, Equations ( 7) and (8) change to

Analysis and Discussion
From Equation (1), the scatter of fatigue strength decreases with decreasing the scale parameter λ for the same shape parameter k.To predict the fatigue strength of the large specimen through that of the small specimen, we have n A > 1, i.e., λn A −1/k < λ in Equation ( 2).This indicates that the scatter of the fatigue strength for the large specimen is smaller than that for the small specimen.Further, Equations ( 7)- (10) indicate that the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength depend not only the control volume ratio, but also the shape parameter k of Weibull distribution for the fatigue strength.Figure 6 shows the relation between the value of (σ A − γ)/(σ B − γ) and the ratio of control volume V A /V B described in Equation (7) for different shape Metals 2018, 8, 811 7 of 13 parameter k.It is seen that the value of (σ A − γ)/(σ B − γ) decreases with increasing the ratio of control volume, i.e., the fatigue strength decreases with the increase of control volume.For the same V A /V B , the value of (σ A − γ)/(σ B − γ) increases with increasing the shape parameter k, i.e., the decrease of the fatigue strength is reduced with the increase of the shape parameter k.This suggests that the shape parameter k of Weibull distribution of the fatigue strength reflects the degree of influence of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength.Figure 6 also indicates that the value of (σ A − γ)/(σ B − γ) tends to zero when the control volume tends to infinity, i.e., the fatigue strength tends to the minimum value γ in Equation (7).This is in agreement with the fact that fatigue strength cannot decrease infinitely with the increase of the control volume (specimen size).
λ for the same shape parameter k.To predict the fatigue strength of the large specimen through that of the small specimen, we have 1 2).This indicates that the scatter of the fatigue strength for the large specimen is smaller than that for the small specimen.Further, Equations ( 7)- (10) indicate that the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength depend not only the control volume ratio, but also the shape parameter k of Weibull distribution for the fatigue strength.Figure 6 shows the relation between the value of (σA − γ)/(σB − γ) and the ratio of control volume VA/VB described in Equation ( 7) for different shape parameter k.It is seen that the value of (σA − γ)/(σB − γ) decreases with increasing the ratio of control volume, i.e. the fatigue strength decreases with the increase of control volume.For the same VA/VB, the value of (σA − γ)/(σB − γ) increases with increasing the shape parameter k, i.e. the decrease of the fatigue strength is reduced with the increase of the shape parameter k.This suggests that the shape parameter k of Weibull distribution of the fatigue strength reflects the degree of influence of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength.Figure 6 also indicates that the value of (σA − γ)/(σB − γ) tends to zero when the control volume tends to infinity, i.e. the fatigue strength tends to the minimum value γ in Equation (7).This is in agreement with the fact that fatigue strength cannot decrease infinitely with the increase of the control volume (specimen size).It is noted that the present formula Equation ( 9) is of the same form as the highly stressed volume method derived from the empirical equation [10,11,17].The difference is that the present formula is derived based on the statistical theory, and the parameter reflecting the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition could be obtained as the shape parameter of Weibull distribution of the fatigue strength of specimens, while for the existing highly stressed volume method, the parameter needs to be determined by fitting the highly stressed volume and the fatigue strength.The present method is also different from the Weibull weakest-link method.For the Weibull weakest-link method [4,17,20], the effective stress amplitude is related to the volume V of a component and the stress distribution in volume V, which needs to make an integral of the stress in volume V, while for the present method based on the control volume concept, the effective stress amplitude is related to the value of the highly stressed volume and the maximum stress [17].It is noted that the present formula Equation ( 9) is of the same form as the highly stressed volume method derived from the empirical equation [10,11,17].The difference is that the present formula is derived based on the statistical theory, and the parameter reflecting the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition could be obtained as the shape parameter of Weibull distribution of the fatigue strength of specimens, while for the existing highly stressed volume method, the parameter needs to be determined by fitting the highly stressed volume and the fatigue strength.The present method is also different from the Weibull weakest-link method.For the Weibull weakest-link method [4,17,20], the effective stress amplitude is related to the volume V of a component and the stress distribution in volume V, which needs to make an integral of the stress in volume V, while for the present method based on the control volume concept, the effective stress amplitude is related to the value of the highly stressed volume and the maximum stress [17].

Probabilistic Stress-Life (P-S-N) Curve Prediction
For the application of the proposed method (probabilistic control volume method), we need to determine the control volume and the shape parameter of Weibull distribution for the fatigue strength at first.Usually, the fatigue tests are performed for the specimens at different stress levels, and there are not enough fatigue strength data at the same fatigue life for statistical analysis.In this case, the bilinear model for the S-N curve is considered [21,22] where a, A and B are constants, N 0 is the number of cycles at the knee point of the curve.Equation ( 11) could be written as where the values of a, B and N 0 could be obtained by iterative calculation to minimize the value of the following equation where σ k is the fatigue strength, N k is the associated fatigue life, k = 1, 2, . . ., n, and n is the number of specimens used for analysis.By using Equation ( 12), the fatigue strength σ k at an arbitrary fatigue life N k could be transformed to the fatigue strength σ k at a given fatigue life N k , i.e., or Then, the distribution form of the fatigue strength at different fatigue lifetimes could be analyzed and the P-S-N curve is determined.

Comparison with Present Experimental Data
A comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the present experimental data for the hourglass specimen and the notch specimen is shown in Figure 3, in which a = −0.0323,B = 2.740 and N 0 = 7.24 × 10 7 for the hourglass specimen and a = −0.0458,B = 2.623 and N 0 = 4.79 × 10 7 for the notch specimen in Figure 3a, a = −0.0323,B = 2.769 and N 0 = 7.24 × 10 7 for the hourglass specimen and a = −0.0458,B = 2.779 and N 0 = 4.79 × 10 7 for the notch specimen in Figure 3b.Here, the two-parameter Weibull distribution is assumed for the fatigue strength.The scale parameter and the shape parameter are obtained via Matlab software version 7.8.0 (MathWorks, Inc., Novi, Michigan, MI, USA).It is seen that the predicted 50% survival probability curve is, in general, in the middle of the scattered experimental data, and almost all the experimental data are within the predicted 95% and 5% survival probability curves, indicating that the predicted P-S-N curves accord with the experimental data.
Considering that all the specimens fail from the surface for the present titanium alloy, the present method with control surface (i.e., Equation ( 10)) is used for the effect of notch on the fatigue strength.The control surface is taken as the region subjected to no less than 90% of the maximum principal stress [17][18][19] and calculated by finite element analysis, which is 18.78 mm 2 for the hourglass specimen and 4.49 mm 2 for the notch specimen.
Figure 7 shows a comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the present experimental data for the notch specimen by using the fatigue strength data of the hourglass specimen.It is seen that the predicted P-S-N curves accord with the experimental data.
The control surface is taken as the region subjected to no less than 90% of the maximum principal stress [17][18][19] and calculated by finite element analysis, which is 18.78 mm 2 for the hourglass specimen and 4.49 mm 2 for the notch specimen.
Figure 7 shows a comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the present experimental data for the notch specimen by using the fatigue strength data of the hourglass specimen.It is seen that the predicted P-S-N curves accord with the experimental data.

Comparison with Experimental Data of a High Strength Steel
Figure 8 shows the comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data of the hourglass specimen with Ф 3 mm in the minimum gauge section for a high strength steel JIS-SCM440 under ultrasonic fatigue test in literature [23], in which a = −0.0483,B = 2.895 and N0 = 8.71 × 10 7 .Figure 8 shows a good agreement for the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data.

Comparison with Experimental Data of a High Strength Steel
Figure 8 shows the comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data of the hourglass specimen with φ 3 mm in the minimum gauge section for a high strength steel JIS-SCM440 under ultrasonic fatigue test in literature [23], in which a = −0.0483,B = 2.895 and N 0 = 8.71 × 10 7 .Figure 8 shows a good agreement for the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data.The comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data for the effect of specimen size on the fatigue strength is shown in Figure 9, in which the experimental data of the hourglass specimen with Ф 3 mm in the minimum gauge section is used to predict the fatigue strength of the hourglass specimen with Ф 7 mm in the minimum gauge section and the dogbone specimen with Ф 8 × 10 mm in straight section.The control volume (the region no less than 90% of the maximum stress) is used on account of the fact that all the specimens fail from the interior [23], which is 33 mm 3 for the hourglass specimen with Ф 3 mm in the minimum gauge section, 254 mm 3 for the hourglass specimen with Ф 7 mm in the minimum gauge section, and 781 mm 3 for the dogbone specimen with Ф 8 × 10 mm in straight section as given in literature [23].It is seen in Figure 9 that the predicted P-S-N curves for the effect of specimen size on the fatigue strength are in good agreement with the experimental data.The comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data for the effect of specimen size on the fatigue strength is shown in Figure 9, in which the experimental data of the hourglass specimen with φ 3 mm in the minimum gauge section is used to predict the fatigue strength of the hourglass specimen with φ 7 mm in the minimum gauge section and the dogbone specimen with φ 8 × 10 mm in straight section.The control volume (the region no less than 90% of the maximum stress) is used on account of the fact that all the specimens fail from the interior [23], which is 33 mm 3 for the hourglass specimen with φ 3 mm in the minimum gauge section, 254 mm 3 for the hourglass specimen with φ 7 mm in the minimum gauge section, and 781 mm 3 for the dogbone specimen with φ 8 × 10 mm in straight section as given in literature [23].It is seen in Figure 9 that the predicted P-S-N curves for the effect of specimen size on the fatigue strength are in good agreement with the experimental data.
size on the fatigue strength is shown in Figure 9, in which the experimental data of the hourglass specimen with Ф 3 mm in the minimum gauge section is used to predict the fatigue strength of the hourglass specimen with Ф 7 mm in the minimum gauge section and the dogbone specimen with Ф 8 × 10 mm in straight section.The control volume (the region no less than 90% of the maximum stress) is used on account of the fact that all the specimens fail from the interior [23], which is 33 mm 3 for the hourglass specimen with Ф 3 mm in the minimum gauge section, 254 mm 3 for the hourglass specimen with Ф 7 mm in the minimum gauge section, and 781 mm 3 for the dogbone specimen with Ф 8 × 10 mm in straight section as given in literature [23].It is seen in Figure 9 that the predicted P-S-N curves for the effect of specimen size on the fatigue strength are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Comparison with Experimental Data of Full Scale Axles
For a further validation of the proposed probabilistic control volume method, it is used to predict the fatigue strength of the full scale EA4T axles by using the fatigue strength data tested for small specimens in literature.
Figure 10 shows a comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data for the small specimen in literature [24], in which a = −0.0487,B = 2.572 and N 0 = 1.66 × 10 6 .It is seen that, the predicted 50% survival probability curve is generally in the middle of the scattered experimental data, and most of the experimental data are within the predicted 95% and 5% survival probability curves, indicating that the predicted P-S-N curves accord well with the experimental data.For a further validation of the proposed probabilistic control volume method, it is used to predict the fatigue strength of the full scale EA4T axles by using the fatigue strength data tested for small specimens in literature.
Figure 10 shows a comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data for the small specimen in literature [24], in which a = −0.0487,B = 2.572 and N0 = 1.66 × 10 6 .It is seen that, the predicted 50% survival probability curve is generally in the middle of the scattered experimental data, and most of the experimental data are within the predicted 95% and 5% survival probability curves, indicating that the predicted P-S-N curves accord well with the experimental data.
Figure 11 shows the comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data of the full scale EA4T axles [24] by using the fatigue strength data of the small specimen [24].Here, the control surface is considered, which is 9656.84mm 2 for the full scale axle and 227.85 mm 2 for the small specimen.The shape and dimension of the full-scale axle is according to work by Cervello [25], which has the same transition geometry as drawing A1 and subjects to rotating bending loading type.The small specimen is according to work by Filippini et al. [26], which has the same test section and subjects to axial loading.The Young's modulus is 206 GPa and Poisson's ratio is 0.29 in the calculation.It is seen from Figure 11 that the predicted P-S-N curves for the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength accord with the experimental data.In particular, the predicted fatigue strength at 50% survival probability is 328 MPa, which is in good agreement with the average free body fatigue strength (limit) 307 MPa of the full scale axle with standard surface finishing by the stair-case method [25], the relative error of the former to the latter is 6.8%.
It is noted that for the fatigue failure of materials dominated by the multiple crack propagation with mutual interactions and coalescences, the large specimen might endure longer crack propagation life than that of the small specimen [6].In this case, the present method is invalid for the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength.Figure 11 shows the comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data of the full scale EA4T axles [24] by using the fatigue strength data of the small specimen [24].Here, the control surface is considered, which is 9656.84mm 2 for the full scale axle and 227.85 mm 2 for the small specimen.The shape and dimension of the full-scale axle is according to work by Cervello [25], which has the same transition geometry as drawing A1 and subjects to rotating bending loading type.The small specimen is according to work by Filippini et al. [26], which has the same test section and subjects to axial loading.The Young's modulus is 206 GPa and Poisson's ratio is 0.29 in the calculation.It is seen from Figure 11 that the predicted P-S-N curves for the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength accord with the experimental data.In particular, the predicted fatigue strength at 50% survival probability is 328 MPa, which is in good agreement with the average free body fatigue strength (limit) 307 MPa of the full scale axle with standard surface finishing by the stair-case method [25], the relative error of the former to the latter is 6.8%.by using the fatigue strength data from the small specimen [24].

Conclusions
In this paper, the effect of notch on the fatigue behavior of a high strength titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-3Mo-X is studied at first by rotating bending fatigue test.It indicates that the notch has important influence on the fatigue strength but no influence on the crack initiation mechanism.Compared with the hourglass the notch specimen shows the higher local fatigue strength at the same fatigue life.
Then, a probabilistic control volume method is developed for the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength based on the statistical theory and the concept of control volume.By assuming that a normal specimen is seen composed of a number of referring specimens through control volume and that the fatigue strength of the referring specimen follows Weibull distribution, a simple formula is obtained for correlating the fatigue strength of specimens with different control volumes, i.e. (σA − γ)/(σB − γ) = (VA/VB) −1/k , where σ denotes the fatigue strength, V denotes the control volume (e.g. the region no less than 90% of the maximum principal stress), γ and k denote the location parameter and shape parameter of Weibull distribution of the fatigue strength, respectively, and subscripts A and B denote the quantities for specimens A and B, respectively.
The predicted results for the effect of specimen geometry on the fatigue strength accord with the present experimental data for a titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-3Mo-X and the data for a high strength steel JIS-SCM440 in literature.The method is further used to predict the fatigue strength of full scale EA4T axles by using the fatigue strength data tested for small specimens in literature.The predicted fatigue strength at 50% survival probability is in good agreement with the average fatigue strength of the full scale axle by the stair-case method, the relative error of which is 6.8%.
The paper also indicates that for the surface induced fatigue failure, it might be appropriate to use the control surface with a certain thickness in the control volume method, while for the interior  [24] by using the fatigue strength data from the small specimen [24].
It is noted that for the fatigue failure of materials dominated by the multiple crack propagation with mutual interactions and coalescences, the large specimen might endure longer crack propagation life than that of the small specimen [6].In this case, the present method is invalid for the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength.

Conclusions
In this paper, the effect of notch on the fatigue behavior of a high strength titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-3Mo-X is studied at first by rotating bending fatigue test.It indicates that the notch has important influence on the fatigue strength but no influence on the crack initiation mechanism.Compared with the hourglass specimen, the notch specimen shows the higher local fatigue strength at the same fatigue life.
Then, a probabilistic control volume method is developed for the effects of specimen geometry and loading condition on the fatigue strength based on the statistical theory and the concept of control volume.By assuming that a normal specimen is seen composed of a number of referring specimens through control volume and that the fatigue strength of the referring specimen follows Weibull distribution, a simple formula is obtained for correlating the fatigue strength of specimens with different control volumes, i.e., (σ A − γ)/(σ B − γ) = (V A /V B ) −1/k , where σ denotes the fatigue strength, V denotes the control volume (e.g., the region no less than 90% of the maximum principal stress), γ and k denote the location parameter and shape parameter of Weibull distribution of the fatigue strength, respectively, and subscripts A and B denote the quantities for specimens A and B, respectively.
The predicted results for the effect of specimen geometry on the fatigue strength accord with the present experimental data for a titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-3Mo-X and the data for a high strength steel JIS-SCM440 in literature.The method is further used to predict the fatigue strength of full scale EA4T axles by using the fatigue strength data tested for small specimens in literature.The predicted fatigue strength at 50% survival probability is in good agreement with the average fatigue strength of the full scale axle by the stair-case method, the relative error of which is 6.8%.
The paper also indicates that for the surface induced fatigue failure, it might be appropriate to use the control surface with a certain thickness in the control volume method, while for the interior induced fatigue failure, the control volume might be more applicable.
volume of specimen A B parameter V B control volume of specimen B F(x) Weibull distribution function V C control volume of referring specimen C h thickness

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Normalized maximum principle stress with depth from the surface of notch root or the smallest cross section of the specimen.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Shape and dimension (in mm) of fatigue specimens.(a) Hourglass specimen with K t = 1.07;(b) Notch specimen with K t = 1.43.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Normalized maximum principle stress with depth from the surface of notch root or the smallest cross section of the specimen.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Normalized maximum principle stress with depth from the surface of notch root or the smallest cross section of the specimen.

Metals 2018, 8 ,
x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 14 maximum principal stress[17][18][19] of the specimen) of the notch specimen is relative smaller than that of the hourglass specimen, which reduces the possibility of fatigue failure of the notch specimens.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. S-N data of hourglass and notch specimens.(a) Nominal stress amplitude versus fatigue life; (b) Local stress amplitude versus fatigue life, in which the solid curve, dashed curve, and the dot and dash curve denote the predicted S-N curves at 50%, 5% and 95% survival probabilities, respectively.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SEM images of fracture surface for hourglass specimens.(a) and (b) Multi-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σa = 840 MPa and Nf = 1.20 × 10 4 ; (c) and (d) Single-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σa =530 MPa and Nf = 6.87 × 10 6 ; (b) and (d) Magnified view of the rectangular region in (a) and (c), respectively.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. S-N data of hourglass and notch specimens.(a) Nominal stress amplitude versus fatigue life; (b) Local stress amplitude versus fatigue life, in which the solid curve, dashed curve, and the dot and dash curve denote the predicted S-N curves at 50%, 5% and 95% survival probabilities, respectively.

Metals 2018, 8 ,
x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 14 maximum principal stress[17][18][19] of the specimen) of the notch specimen is relative smaller than that of the hourglass specimen, which reduces the possibility of fatigue failure of the notch specimens.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. S-N data of hourglass and notch specimens.(a) Nominal stress amplitude versus fatigue life; (b) Local stress amplitude versus fatigue life, in which the solid curve, dashed curve, and the dot and dash curve denote the predicted S-N curves at 50%, 5% and 95% survival probabilities, respectively.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SEM images of fracture surface for hourglass specimens.(a) and (b) Multi-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σa = 840 MPa and Nf = 1.20 × 10 4 ; (c) and (d) Single-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σa =530 MPa and Nf = 6.87 × 10 6 ; (b) and (d) Magnified view of the rectangular region in (a) and (c), respectively.

Figure 4 . 14 Figure 5 .
Figure 4. SEM images of fracture surface for hourglass specimens.(a) and (b) Multi-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σ a = 840 MPa and N f = 1.20 × 10 4 ; (c) and (d) Single-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σ a =530 MPa and N f = 6.87 × 10 6 ; (b) and (d) Magnified view of the rectangular region in (a) and (c), respectively.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. SEM images of fracture surface for notch specimens.(a) and (b) Multi-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σ a = 550 MPa and N f = 1.64 × 10 5 ; (c) and (d) Single-site crack initiation from the specimen surface at nominal stress amplitude σ a = 520 MPa and N f = 5.21 × 10 6 ; (b) and (d) Magnified view of the rectangular region in (a) and (c), respectively.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with present experimental data for the notch specimen by using the fatigue strength data of the hourglass specimen

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with present experimental data for the notch specimen using the fatigue strength data of the hourglass specimen.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data for a high strength steel JIS-SCM440 in literature [23].

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data for a high strength steel JIS-SCM440 in literature [23].

Figure 9 .
Figure 9.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data in literature [23] by using the fatigue strength data from the hourglass specimen with Ф 3 mm in the minimum gauge section.(a) Comparison for the hourglass specimen with Ф 7 mm in the minimum gauge section; (b) Comparison for the dogbone specimen with Ф 8 × 10 mm in straight section.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data in literature [23] by using the fatigue strength data from the hourglass specimen with φ 3 mm in the minimum gauge section.(a) Comparison for the hourglass specimen with φ 7 mm in the minimum gauge section; (b) Comparison for the dogbone specimen with φ 8 × 10 mm in straight section.

Figure 10 .
Figure10.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data for the small specimen in literature[24].

Figure 10 .
Figure10.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data for the small specimen in literature[24].

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data of full scale EA4T axles[24] by using the fatigue strength data from the small specimen[24].

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Comparison of predicted P-S-N curves with experimental data of full scale EA4T axles[24] by using the fatigue strength data from the small specimen[24].