Effects of Austenitizing Conditions on the Microstructure of AISI M42 High-Speed Steel

: The inﬂuences of austenitizing conditions on the microstructure of AISI M42 high-speed steel were investigated through thermodynamic calculation, microstructural analysis, and in-situ observation by a confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM). Results show that the network morphology of carbides could not dissolve completely and distribute equably in the case of the austenitizing temperature is 1373 K. When the austenitizing temperature reaches 1473 K, the excessive increase in temperature leads to increase in carbide dissolution, higher dissolved alloying element contents, and unwanted grain growth. Thus, 1453 K is conﬁrmed as the best austenitizing condition on temperature for the steel. In addition, variations on the microstructure and hardness of the steel are not obvious when holding time ranges from 15 to 30 min with the austenitizing temperature of 1453 K. However, when the holding time reaches 45 min, the average size of carbides tends to increase because of Ostwald ripening. Furthermore, the value of M s and M f decrease with the increase of cooling rate. Hence, high cooling rate can depress the martensitic transformation and increase the content of retained austenite. As a result, the hardness of the steel is the best (65.6 HRc) when the austenitizing temperature reaches 1453 K and is held for 30 min.


Introduction
High-speed steels (HSS) have been widely used to make engineering cutting tools in quenched and high-temperature tempered conditions due to their high hardness, wear resistance, and favorable high-temperature properties [1][2][3].Among them, AISI M42 HSS is one of the most popular one owing to its excellent combination of hardness and toughness.
The mechanical properties of AISI M42 HSS are determined by the martensitic matrix and distribution of carbides.The cast structure of high-speed steel can be improved by subsequent heat treatment processes such as annealing, quenching, and tempering.Under annealing conditions, high-speed steels have a ferrite matrix with plenty of undissolved carbides.Following quenching, they contain martensite, retained austenite, and undissolved carbides.The final microstructure after tempering, which may occur several times, mainly consists of tempered martensite and well-distributed hard carbides [1,[4][5][6].It is known that microstructural factors like distribution of carbides, as well as characteristics of the martensitic matrix, play important roles in optimizing the properties of high-speed steel such as hardness, wear resistance, fracture toughness, and thermal-fatigue behavior.It is also well known that the martensite morphology of HSS depends on austenitizing temperature and its holding time, prior deformation of the austenite matrix, chemical composition of alloys, and the cooling rate [7,8].A lot of studies have been performed on the effects of austenitizing conditions on the microstructure of high-speed steel.Sarafianos [9] reported that the mechanical properties of high-speed steel can be improved by austenitizing heat treatment at 1463 K for 30 s.The microstructure is altered to a mixture of martensite and retained austenite, and the types of carbides after austenitizing are mainly Mo and W enriched carbides.Hashimoto et al. [10] noticed that the austenitizing time did not significantly change the morphology, size, and distribution of eutectic carbides.Fu et al. [11] investigated the effects of quenching and tempering treatment on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and abrasion resistance of high-speed steel.Their results showed that the hardness of high-speed steel increased with the increase of austenitizing temperature, but decreased while the austenitizing temperature exceeds 1323 K.When the austenitizing temperature reached 1273 K, the metallic matrix all transformed into martensite.Afterwards, the eutectic carbides dissolve into the metallic matrix and their continuous network distribution changed into the broken network.However, Kang et al. [12] reported that the HSS showed the best wear resistance when the austenitizing temperature was 1473 K, because M 6 C phase was dissolved at such a high temperature, only MC carbide could be stable for its property of hindering crack propagation.Accordingly, opinions are divergent on the effective austenitizing temperature and its holding time, which are beneficial to the mechanical property of high-speed steel.
The present work aims to identify the correlation between microstructure and hardness of AISI M42 HSS.It also intends to provide essential conditions for heat treatment by investigating the effects of austenitizing temperature, holding time, and cooling rate on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Materials and Methods
Material used in this investigation was produced and developed at the pilot plant of the Central Irom & Steel Research Institute (Beijing, China).The AISI M42 high-speed steel scrap was melted in vacuum induction furnace and refined through electroslag remelting (ESR) furnace.The ESR ingot was 16 cm in diameter and 100 cm in length.The chemical compositions of the produced ingot were measured by spectrograph and summarized in Table 1.According to this composition, the equilibrium phase diagram was calculated by Thermal-Calc software (Thermal-Calc Software, Stockholm, Sweden) with the TCFE7 database.A thermal dilatometer (DIL, Fuji Electric, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to measure martensite start temperature (M s ), martensite finish temperature (M f ), and simulate the continued cooling transformation (CCT) curve of steel.To examine the correlation between martensitic transformation and cooling rate, the as-cast samples were machined into 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length and heated up to 1473 K (1200 • C) with the heating rate of 10 K/s, maintained for 5 min and then cooled down with a series of cooling rates, such as 20 K/s, 10 K/s, 5 K/s, 1 K/s, 0.5 K/s, 0.1 K/s.The specimens machined into 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm were heated to 1373, 1423, 1453, and 1473 K (1100, 1150, 1180, and 1200 • C) at a rate of 10 K/s, and then held for 15 min followed by oil quenching in a box-type furnace.The specimens which heated to 1453 K (1180 • C) were held for 15, 30, and 45 min.Figures 1 and 2 show the detailed quenching process.In order to avoid the deformation and cracking due to excessive internal stress of the steel, the specimens were preheated at 1123 K for 10 min.The as-cast steel, as well as the quenched specimens, were machined into 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm and polished for microstructural observation using scanning electron microscope (SEM, Carl-Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).The average grain size of the specimens and volume fraction of carbides were counted by Image-Pro Plus software.The final value was the average by measuring 10 photos of each condition.Specimens for grain size measurement were polished and etched using a Nital etchant (Ethanol + 4 vol.% Nitric acid) to reveal the grain boundary, and then measured according to GB/T 6394-2002.Rockwell hardness tests were conducted on these specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm) using a Hardness Tester (TIME, Beijing, China).Impact toughness of the specimens with different austenitizing conditions were measured by Charpy Tester (SANS, Shenzhen, China), the specimens were machined into 10 mm × 10 mm × 55 mm without notch.
In order to observe the evolution of microstructure in situ, a confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM, Lasertec, Yokohama, Japan) equipped with an infrared image furnace was employed in this study.The specimens were heated up to 1473 K (1200 • C) in an alumina crucible, thermal insulated for 15 min, and cooled to room temperature at a cooling rate of 5 K/s and 20 K/s, respectively.The whole process of the experiment was under an ultra-high purity argon gas and the cooling rate was controlled by adjusting nitrogen gas flowrate.
In order to observe the evolution of microstructure in situ, a confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM, Lasertec, Yokohama, Japan) equipped with an infrared image furnace was employed in this study.The specimens were heated up to 1473 K (1200 °C) in an alumina crucible, thermal insulated for 15 min, and cooled to room temperature at a cooling rate of 5 K/s and 20 K/s, respectively.The whole process of the experiment was under an ultra-high purity argon gas and the cooling rate was controlled by adjusting nitrogen gas flowrate.In order to observe the evolution of microstructure in situ, a confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM, Lasertec, Yokohama, Japan) equipped with an infrared image furnace was employed in this study.The specimens were heated up to 1473 K (1200 °C) in an alumina crucible, thermal insulated for 15 min, and cooled to room temperature at a cooling rate of 5 K/s and 20 K/s, respectively.The whole process of the experiment was under an ultra-high purity argon gas and the cooling rate was controlled by adjusting nitrogen gas flowrate.

Phase Transformation and Precipitation Behavior of Carbides
Because the microstructure of as-cast HSS usually consists of ferrite and pearlite, austenitizing and subsequent rapid cooling were employed to improve hardness of the steel.The phase stability diagram of AISI M42 HSS obtained from Thermo-Calc was shown in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, the liquidus temperature and the solidus temperature of present AISI M42 HSS are 1680 K (1407 • C) and 1500 K (1227 • C), respectively.When the steel is slow cooling to room temperature, the carbides of the present steel consisted of M 6 C, M 7 C 3 , and MC.MC starts to precipitate at 1550 K (1277 • C) in the solid-liquid zone, while M 6 C and M 7 C 3 begin to precipitate in the solid phase at 1500 K (1227 • C) and 1140 K (867 • C), respectively.That means when the specimens are heated to the experimental temperatures and rapid cooling, M 7 C 3 have been dissolved into the matrix and the carbides of the present specimens consisted of MC and M 6 C.
The determined CCT diagram of AISI M42 HSS austenitized at 1473 K (1200 • C) was shown in Figure 4.The dotted lines means different cooling rates range from 100 K/h to 30 K/s.The martensite point (M s ), critical temperatures of A c1 and A c3 (the start and end of austenitic transformation on heating) were determined corresponding to a heating (10 K/s) up to 1473 K (1200 • C) and subsequent cooling down (5 K/s) to room temperature.As shown in Figure 4, the pearlitic transformation is only possible when the cooling rate is as slow as 100 K/h.Bainitic transformation occurs at the range from 100 to 1000 K/h.For the cooling rate of 1 to 30 K/s, martensite would precipitate directly and cross the area of pearlite and bainite.

Phase Transformation and Precipitation Behavior of Carbides
Because the microstructure of as-cast HSS usually consists of ferrite and pearlite, austenitizing and subsequent rapid cooling were employed to improve hardness of the steel.The phase stability diagram of AISI M42 HSS obtained from Thermo-Calc was shown in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, the liquidus temperature and the solidus temperature of present AISI M42 HSS are 1680 K (1407 °C) and 1500 K (1227 °C), respectively.When the steel is slow cooling to room temperature, the carbides of the present steel consisted of M6C, M7C3, and MC.MC starts to precipitate at 1550 K (1277 °C) in the solid-liquid zone, while M6C and M7C3 begin to precipitate in the solid phase at 1500 K (1227 °C) and 1140 K (867 °C), respectively.That means when the specimens are heated to the experimental temperatures and rapid cooling, M7C3 have been dissolved into the matrix and the carbides of the present specimens consisted of MC and M6C.
The determined CCT diagram of AISI M42 HSS austenitized at 1473 K (1200 °C) was shown in Figure 4.The dotted lines means different cooling rates range from 100 K/h to 30 K/s.The martensite point (Ms), critical temperatures of Ac1 and Ac3 (the start and end of austenitic transformation on heating) were determined corresponding to a heating (10 K/s) up to 1473 K (1200 °C) and subsequent cooling down (5 K/s) to room temperature.As shown in Figure 4, the pearlitic transformation is only possible when the cooling rate is as slow as 100 K/h.Bainitic transformation occurs at the range from 100 to 1000 K/h.For the cooling rate of 1 to 30 K/s, martensite would precipitate directly and cross the area of pearlite and bainite.

Effects of Austenitizing Temperature on Microstructure and Properties
SEM micrograph of as-cast HSS specimen was shown in Figure 5a.As indicated by arrows, network carbides M2C, and graininess-shaped carbides MC (red circles) were found in the micrograph.However, M2C did not appear in the phase stability diagram because M2C particles are in the metastable phase.MC carbides were dispersed in the matrix and the average size of them was much smaller than M2C carbides.The grains in the as-cast HSS were completely surrounded by the layers of M2C, namely, grain boundaries (GBs) were completely wetted by the second solid phase M2C carbides.Microstructure of AISI M42 HSS specimens oil cooled at different temperatures were shown in Figure 5b-e.The population of the carbides was being steadily reduced with the increase of temperature during austenitization.When the austenitizing temperature was 1373 K (1100 °C), fibrous M2C particles decomposed into M6C and MC particles [13,14].However, the network morphology of carbides still exists as shown in Figure 5b.With the increasing of austenitizing temperature, the continuous network distribution of carbides turn to be broken and scattered as shown in Figure 5c,d.The portion of completely wetted GBs decreased as well.When GBs wetted by a liquid phase (melt), the amount of completely wetted GBs always increases with the increase of temperature due to higher entropy of a melt [15,16].However, when GBs are wetted by a second solid phase, the completely wetted GBs will decrease with the increase of temperature [17,18].Moreover, Ms point will decrease and the stability of austenite will increase because the hightemperature austenite dissolves more carbon and alloying elements with the increase of austenitizing temperature [19,20].When the austenitizing temperature reaches 1473 K (1200 °C), more carbides dissolve into the metallic matrix so that the quantity of carbides reduced rapidly as shown in Figure 5e.No sufficient number of carbides were available to pin down the grain boundaries to prevent grain coarsening, so it is more probable for cracks to be formed [4,9].Besides, austenitizing temperature approaching the melting point of the experimental AISI M42 HSS (1500 K) leads to partial melting and agminate carbide precipitation of the specimen.Figure 6 shows the relationship between the average grain size and austenitizing temperature of the specimens.The average grain size presents a smooth increase with the increase of temperature.However, it shows an impressive   [13,14].However, the network morphology of carbides still exists as shown in Figure 5b.With the increasing of austenitizing temperature, the continuous network distribution of carbides turn to be broken and scattered as shown in Figure 5c,d.The portion of completely wetted GBs decreased as well.When GBs wetted by a liquid phase (melt), the amount of completely wetted GBs always increases with the increase of temperature due to higher entropy of a melt [15,16].However, when GBs are wetted by a second solid phase, the completely wetted GBs will decrease with the increase of temperature [17,18].Moreover, M s point will decrease and the stability of austenite will increase because the high-temperature austenite dissolves more carbon and alloying elements with the increase of austenitizing temperature [19,20].When the austenitizing temperature reaches 1473 K (1200 • C), more carbides dissolve into the metallic matrix so that the quantity of carbides reduced rapidly as shown in Figure 5e.No sufficient number of carbides were available to pin down the grain boundaries to prevent grain coarsening, so it is more probable for cracks to be formed [4,9].Besides, austenitizing temperature approaching the melting point of the experimental AISI M42 HSS (1500 K) leads to partial melting and agminate carbide precipitation of the specimen.Figure 6 shows the relationship between the average grain size and austenitizing temperature of the specimens.The average grain size presents a smooth increase with the increase of temperature.However, it shows an impressive promotion (35 µm) during a period from 1453 to 1473 K. Consequently, an excessive increase in temperature results in increased carbide dissolution and unwanted grain growth.Table 2 presents the corresponding hardness and impact toughness of AISI M42 HSS specimens with different austenitizing temperatures and holding time.The hardness increased with the austenitizing temperature between 1373 and 1453 K, but decreased when the austenitizing temperature reached 1473 K.This phenomenon could be explained by the reducing of well-distribution hard carbides.The hardness of quenched HSS is affected by the microstructure, the quantity of carbides, and alloy elements in the martensite and the retained austenite [21,22].Carbon and alloying elements dissolved into the austenite, and then transferred to martensite by oil cooling, and the quantity increased with the increase of austenitizing temperature.However, when the austenitizing temperature reached 1473 K, there was an excess dissolution of carbon and alloying elements in the austenite.Besides, M s tends to decrease when alloying elements dissolved in the steel at high temperature [21].It lead to excess retained austenite remaining in the microstructure after oil cooling which reduced the hardness of the steel.On the contrary, the impact toughness increased with the increase of austenitizing temperature for the increasing of retained austenite.Consequently, in the experimental temperature range, the tendency of the hardness of the specimens presented a peak, and the impact toughness increased with increasing temperature.

Effects of Austenitizing Time on Microstructure and Properties
The series in Figure 7 represent SEM micrographs of the specimens austenitized at 1453 K for 15 to 45 min.From Figure 7a,b, change on the microstructure of the specimens was not obvious under the austenitizing time ranges between 15 and 30 min, as well as the hardness (Table 2).However, the hardness of the specimen decreased when the holding time up to 45 min.Besides, the average size of the carbides tends to increase but the quantity of carbides seems decrease as shown in Figure 7c.This phenomenon could be explained by the fact of Ostwald ripening.Since carbides with large sizes have a lower interfacial concentration.The resulting concentration gradients give rise to diffusional transport from small carbides to the matrix then to large carbides.Thus, large carbides tend to grow at the expense of the small carbides, the average particle size increases, and the total number of carbides decreases [23,24].The impact toughness of the specimens increased with the increase of holding time.Because more carbides and alloy elements dissolved in the matrix promoted solution strengthening, and made retained austenite stable.Figure 8 is the volume fraction of carbides in the specimens with different holding time and austenitizing temperatures.The blue line means cooling at different austenitizing temperature but with the same holding time-i.e., 15 min.The red line represents cooling with different holding time at the same austenitizing temperature, i.e., 1453 K. Compared with that of the as-cast specimen, the quantity of carbides in AISI M42 HSS after austenitizing reduced greatly.At 1453 K, the quantity of carbides showed a smooth decrease with the increase of holding time.It could be thought that this decrease in the amount of the carbides is due to the dissolution of carbides into austenite matrix phase.Moreover, the decrease of carbides with different holding time is much weaker than that with different austenitizing temperatures.Consequently, the effect of austenitizing temperature on the microstructure and hardness of AISI M42 HSS is more influential than the austenitizing time.

Effects of Cooling Rate on Microstructure and Properties
In order to investigate the effects of cooling rate on the microstructure and observe the phase transformation and precipitation of AISI M42 HSS in situ, CSLM was employed in combination with thermal dilatometer experimental determination.Ms and Mf were measured by a thermal dilatometer and shown in Figure 9.

Effects of Cooling Rate on Microstructure and Properties
In order to investigate the effects of cooling rate on the microstructure and observe the phase transformation and precipitation of AISI M42 HSS in situ, CSLM was employed in combination with thermal dilatometer experimental determination.Ms and Mf were measured by a thermal dilatometer and shown in Figure 9.

Effects of Cooling Rate on Microstructure and Properties
In order to investigate the effects of cooling rate on the microstructure and observe the phase transformation and precipitation of AISI M42 HSS in situ, CSLM was employed in combination with thermal dilatometer experimental determination.M s and M f were measured by a thermal dilatometer and shown in Figure 9.As the cooling rate increases, the value of the Ms and Mf points decrease consequently (Figure 9).When the cooling rate is 5 K/s, the value of Ms and Mf are 448 K (175 °C) and 380 K (107 °C), respectively.When the cooling rate reaches 20 K/s, the value of Ms and Mf decrease to 419 K (146 °C) and 347 K (74 °C), respectively.
Figure 10 shows the sequential image of the in-situ observation on AISI M42 HSS cooling from 1473 K (1200 °C) to room temperature by the rate of 5 K/s.Each image is arranged in the order of the corresponding temperature.Figure 10a,b is magnified 500 times and Figure 10c-f is magnified 1000 times.In the heat up stage, some small carbides precipitated because of the volume contraction caused by austenite transformation (Figure 10a).When the temperature reached 1473 K (1200 °C), an outburst of precipitation and growth of carbides appeared (Figure 10b).At the beginning of cooling, the specimen consisted of austenite and carbides which precipitate on the grain boundaries, and the grain size was about 15 to 25 μm (Figure 10c).When the temperature decreased to 1281 K (1008 °C), acicular ferrite started to transform from austenite (Figure 10d).The martensitic transformation began at about 446 K (173 °C) with a saltatory mode along the grain boundary and the undissolved carbides, as shown in Figure 10e.During the increase of marensite, a position of grain boundaries were replaced by martensite.No pearlite appears in the range from 1281 K (1008 °C) to 446 K (173 °C), which indicates that the cooling rate of 5 K/s is greater than the critical cooling rate of pearlitic transformation (Figure 4).When the temperature dropped to room temperature, martensitic transformation was still underway and there was a small group of retained austenite in the microstructure (Figure 10f).It is worth noting that martensitic transformation is usually finished rapidly in most of low-carbon steels [25,26].However, for the high-carbon steel AISI M42, martensite transformed with a saltatory mode.Martensite still emerged sporadically during in-situ observation when the temperature dropped to room temperature.Because martensitic transformation is affected by shear resistance in kinetics, it could be worth considering that a higher content of carbon would increase the shear resistance of martensitic transformation and slow down the transformation rate.As the cooling rate increases, the value of the M s and M f points decrease consequently (Figure 9).When the cooling rate is 5 K/s, the value of M s and M f are 448 K (175 • C) and 380 K (107 • C), respectively.When the cooling rate reaches 20 K/s, the value of M s and M f decrease to 419 K (146 • C) and 347 K (74 • C), respectively.
Figure 10 shows the sequential image of the in-situ observation on AISI M42 HSS cooling from 1473 K (1200 • C) to room temperature by the rate of 5 K/s.Each image is arranged in the order of the corresponding temperature.Figure 10a,b is magnified 500 times and Figure 10c-f is magnified 1000 times.In the heat up stage, some small carbides precipitated because of the volume contraction caused by austenite transformation (Figure 10a).When the temperature reached 1473 K (1200 • C), an outburst of precipitation and growth of carbides appeared (Figure 10b).At the beginning of cooling, the specimen consisted of austenite and carbides which precipitate on the grain boundaries, and the grain size was about 15 to 25 µm (Figure 10c).When the temperature decreased to 1281 K (1008 • C), acicular ferrite started to transform from austenite (Figure 10d).The martensitic transformation began at about 446 K (173 • C) with a saltatory mode along the grain boundary and the undissolved carbides, as shown in Figure 10e.During the increase of marensite, a position of grain boundaries were replaced by martensite.No pearlite appears in the range from 1281 K (1008 • C) to 446 K (173 • C), which indicates that the cooling rate of 5 K/s is greater than the critical cooling rate of pearlitic transformation (Figure 4).When the temperature dropped to room temperature, martensitic transformation was still underway and there was a small group of retained austenite in the microstructure (Figure 10f).It is worth noting that martensitic transformation is usually finished rapidly in most of low-carbon steels [25,26].However, for the high-carbon steel AISI M42, martensite transformed with a saltatory mode.Martensite still emerged sporadically during in-situ observation when the temperature dropped to room temperature.Because martensitic transformation is affected by shear resistance in kinetics, it could be worth considering that a higher content of carbon would increase the shear resistance of martensitic transformation and slow down the transformation rate.The phase transformation and precipitation behavior of AISI M42 HSS austenitizing at 1473 K (1200 °C) with the cooling rate of 20 K/s was shown in Figure 11.It seems to be very different from that with the cooling rate of 5 K/s.At the beginning of cooling, the specimen also consisted of austenite and carbides (Figure 11a).Acicular and triangular ferrite transformation began at 1323 K (1050 °C) (Figure 11b).The grain size was uneven between 20 and 50 μm.Because the cooling rate (20 K/s) is much greater than the critical cooling rate of pearlitic transformation, no pearlite appeared in the process of cooling (Figure 4).When the temperature decreased to 421 K (148 °C), martensite started to transform from the austenite (Figure 11c).Because there was so little time for martensitic transformation and carbide dissolution, there was still much retained austenite that had not finished the transformation in the microstructure (Figure 11d).Moreover, increasing the cooling rate could decrease Ms and Mf point which narrow the martensitic transformation range (Figure 9).The carbides likewise were hardly dissolved and presented network, which could provide routes for crack propagation and make cracks deeper [27,28].Therefore, it might be worth considering that a high The phase transformation and precipitation behavior of AISI M42 HSS austenitizing at 1473 K (1200 • C) with the cooling rate of 20 K/s was shown in Figure 11.It seems to be very different from that with the cooling rate of 5 K/s.At the beginning of cooling, the specimen also consisted of austenite and carbides (Figure 11a).Acicular and triangular ferrite transformation began at 1323 K (1050 • C) (Figure 11b).The grain size was uneven between 20 and 50 µm.Because the cooling rate (20 K/s) is much greater than the critical cooling rate of pearlitic transformation, no pearlite appeared in the process of cooling (Figure 4).When the temperature decreased to 421 K (148 • C), martensite started to transform from the austenite (Figure 11c).Because there was so little time for martensitic transformation and carbide dissolution, there was still much retained austenite that had not finished the transformation in the microstructure (Figure 11d).Moreover, increasing the cooling rate could decrease M s and M f point which narrow the martensitic transformation range (Figure 9).The carbides likewise were hardly dissolved and presented network, which could provide routes for crack propagation and make cracks deeper [27,28].Therefore, it might be worth considering that a high cooling rate can depress the martensitic transformation and increase the content of retained austenite.Consequently, an exorbitant cooling rate prevents less retained austenite, better microstructure, and higher hardness in AISI M42 HSS.
cooling rate can depress the martensitic transformation and increase the content of retained austenite.Consequently, an exorbitant cooling rate prevents less retained austenite, better microstructure, and higher hardness in AISI M42 HSS.

Conclusions
In this study, effects of austenitizing temperature, holding time, and cooling rate on the microstructure and hardness of AISI M42 HSS were investigated.The conclusions have been drawn as follows: 1.When the austenitizing temperature is 1373 K, the network morphology of carbides could not dissolve completely and distribute equably.When the austenitizing temperature reaches 1473 K, the excessive increase in temperature leads to increased carbide dissolution and unwanted grain growth.1453 K gives the best austenitizing condition on temperature for AISI M42 HSS. 2. The amount of hardness increases with the increase of austenitizing temperature between 1373 and 1453 K, but decreases when the austenitizing temperature reaches 1473 K.The hardness of the AISI M42 HSS does not change much when the holding time is less than 30 min, but decreases when the holding time reaches 45 min because of Ostwald ripening.The impact toughness of the specimens increases with the increase of austenitizing temperature and holding time.3. The value of Ms and Mf decrease with the increase of cooling rate.High cooling rate can depress the martensitic transformation and increase the content of retained austenite, which prevents less retained austenite, better microstructure, and higher hardness in AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Experimental process for the investigation of effect of austenitizing temperature on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Experimental process for the investigation of effect of holding time on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Experimental process for the investigation of effect of austenitizing temperature on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Experimental process for the investigation of effect of austenitizing temperature on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Experimental process for the investigation of effect of holding time on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Experimental process for the investigation of effect of holding time on the microstructure of AISI M42 HSS.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Phase equilibrium diagram of AISI M42 HSS calculated using Thermo-Calc software.A dotted vertical line means the C concentration (1.11 wt.%) of the present steel.The blue lines show the region of four different temperatures.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Phase equilibrium diagram of AISI M42 HSS calculated using Thermo-Calc software.A dotted vertical line means the C concentration (1.11 wt.%) of the present steel.The blue lines show the region of four different temperatures.

3. 2 .
Effects of Austenitizing Temperature on Microstructure and Properties SEM micrograph of as-cast HSS specimen was shown in Figure 5a.As indicated by arrows, network carbides M 2 C, and graininess-shaped carbides MC (red circles) were found in the micrograph.However, M 2 C did not appear in the phase stability diagram because M 2 C particles are in the metastable phase.MC carbides were dispersed in the matrix and the average size of them was much smaller than M 2 C carbides.The grains in the as-cast HSS were completely surrounded by the layers of M 2 C, namely, grain boundaries (GBs) were completely wetted by the second solid phase M 2 C carbides.Microstructure of AISI M42 HSS specimens oil cooled at different temperatures were shown in Figure 5b-e.The population of the carbides was being steadily reduced with the increase of temperature during austenitization.When the austenitizing temperature was 1373 K (1100 • C), fibrous M 2 C particles decomposed into M 6 C and MC particles μm) during a period from 1453 to 1473 K. Consequently, an excessive increase in temperature results in increased carbide dissolution and unwanted grain growth.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Relationships between grain size and austenitizing temperature.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Relationships between grain size and austenitizing temperature.Figure 6. Relationships between grain size and austenitizing temperature.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Relationships between grain size and austenitizing temperature.Figure 6. Relationships between grain size and austenitizing temperature.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.The volume fraction of carbides in the specimens with different holding time and austenitizing temperatures.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.The volume fraction of carbides in the specimens with different holding time and austenitizing temperatures.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.The volume fraction of carbides in the specimens with different holding time and austenitizing temperatures.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Ms and Mf of as-cast AISI M42 HSS under different cooling rates.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. M s and M f of as-cast AISI M42 HSS under different cooling rates.

Table 2 .
Effects of austenitizing conditions on hardness and impact toughness of AISI M42 HSS.