Processing and Properties of Aluminum and Magnesium Based Composites Containing Amorphous Reinforcement : A Review

This review deals with the processing and properties of novel lightweight metal matrix composites. Conventionally, hard and strong ceramic particles are used as reinforcement to fabricate metal matrix composites (MMCs). However, the poor mechanical properties associated with the interfacial de-cohesion and undesirable reactions at (ceramic) particle–(metallic) matrix interface represent major drawbacks. To overcome this limitation, metallic amorphous alloys (bulk metallic glass) have been recently identified as a promising alternative. Given the influential properties of amorphous metallic alloys, their incorporation is expected to positively influence the properties of light metal matrices when compared to conventional ceramic reinforcement. In view of this, a short account of the existing literature based on the processing and properties of Aland Mg-matrix composites containing amorphous/bulk metallic glass (BMG) reinforcement is presented in this review.


Introduction
Metallic glasses are novel metallic materials that exhibit superior properties such as high strength (~2 GPa) and elastic strain limit (~2%) [1].Recently, there have been some attempts to use these metallic glasses as reinforcement in metal matrix composites.Conventionally, metal-matrix composites are made by incorporating hard and strong ceramic reinforcement such as Al2O3 or SiC, in the form of fibers, flakes or particles [2].However, the undesirable reactions and the interfacial de-cohesion at the (ceramic) particle-(metallic) matrix interface often result in poor mechanical properties [3].In this regard, considering the metastable nature of the amorphous/metallic glass materials, they are considered viable for use as reinforcement in light metal matrices such as Al and Mg with relatively low melting points.Further, the reinforcement/matrix interface being metallic in nature is expected to negate the adverse effects experienced in conventional ceramic reinforced composites [4].In this respect, the present article will give an in-detail review of the research efforts that have been undertaken so far on the development of amorphous/metallic glass reinforced light-metal matrix composites.In the first section, the preparation and properties of aluminum metal matrix composites containing amorphous reinforcement are presented and the second section deals with that of magnesium matrix composites.

Ni-Based Amorphous/Glassy Reinforcements
Lee et al. fabricated amorphous/glass reinforced Al-composite for the first time, by reinforcing 20 vol% of Ni-Nb-Ta amorphous alloy (in the form of ribbons) in Al-matrix (Al-356 alloy) using the melt infiltration technique [4].In this study, the Al-6.5Si-0.25Mg(wt%) alloy was selected as matrix material and the excellent castability of the selected alloy ensured fabrication of defect-free composites by the infiltration process.Here, the Ni-Nb-Ta based Ni39.2Nb20.6Ta40.2(wt%) alloy with excellent thermal stability against crystallization (crystallization onset temperature = 721 °C, which is higher than the liquidus temperature of the A356 alloy = 613 °C) was carefully chosen as the reinforcing material, so as to retain the amorphous structure of the reinforcement.In the first stage, amorphous ribbons (thickness: ~30 µm, width: ~1 mm) of the above mentioned Ni-Nb-Ta alloy were fabricated using the melt spinning process and then cold-pressed (pressure: 16 MPa) into cylindrical preforms (diameter: 9 mm and height: 15 mm) for composite making.In the next stage, the melt infiltration process involved the heating and pressure infiltration of the molten A356 alloy into the prepared amorphous preform.Upon successful synthesis, the structural, thermal, and mechanical properties of the bulk composites were investigated.The results of optical microscopic analysis (Figure 1a) showed the absence of any macro scale defects and showed a homogenous distribution of amorphous reinforcement.Also, no new additional phases were reported in this study which was attributed to the thermal and structural stability of the amorphous reinforcement.Using X-ray diffraction analysis, the crystallographic properties of the composite samples were studied in comparison to that of the amorphous ribbon and the base Al-alloy.The reported X-ray diffractograms are shown in Figure 1b.They show the retention of the amorphous structure of the Ni-Nb-Ta alloy even after the infiltration process which confirmed the suitability of the infiltration process to fabricate light metal matrix composites containing amorphous particles of high thermal stability.Mechanical property measurements were carried out under indentation and compression loads and the reported properties (Table 1) revealed an increment in strength by amorphous reinforcement addition.Following the work of Lee et al. [4], Yu et al. [5] fabricated Ni70Nb30 metallic glass particle-reinforced Al-metal matrix composite using the powder metallurgy route by sintering below the melting temperature of Al.In this work, the Ni70Nb30 glass particles were prepared by ball milling pure Ni and Nb elemental powders for 20 h.As it is known that most of the metallic glasses have a crystallization temperature lower than the melting point of Al alloys (~933 K), the selection of sintering temperature and time plays an important role in the solid state powder metallurgy processing of bulk metallic glass (BMG) particle reinforced light metal matrix composites.In this study, to avoid the crystallization of amorphous reinforcement, the Al-30 wt% Ni70Nb30 glass particles reinforced composite was compacted at room temperature and sintered at 773 K for 2 h.Microstructural features showed the retention of the amorphous state of the glassy particles after sintering, with no interfacial products.Investigation on the mechanical properties showed an increase in compressive yield and ultimate tensile strengths when compared to pure Al, in addition to a 69% increase in the Young's modulus value.Eckert et al. [6] also used Ni60Nb40 (at%) amorphous powder reinforcement.The amorphous Ni60Nb40 powder (30 wt%) prepared by mechanical alloying was reinforced in pure Al by mixing, sintering, hot pressing, and hot extrusion.Sintering was performed at ~823 K which is below the recrystallization temperature of Ni60Nb40 amorphous powder.Results of X-ray diffraction analysis conducted on the composite specimen confirmed the retention of the amorphous structure of Ni60Nb40 (at%) reinforcement and only the crystalline peaks of Al were present.The results of indentation and compression tests (Table 1) revealed superior mechanical properties (in all conditions), which was attributed to the inherent superior strength of the Ni60Nb40 (at%) amorphous alloy (strength ~2GPa and hardness ~800 Hv).
Recently, Jayalakshmi et al. [7] prepared Al-matrix composites containing different amounts of Ni60Nb40 (at%) amorphous reinforcement using rapid microwave sintering assisted powder metallurgy technique.The amorphous Ni60Nb40 alloy reinforcement required for the study was initially prepared by ball milling the elemental Ni and Nb metal powder in a planetary ball milling machine for 87 h.The ball milling parameters include milling speed of 200 rpm, and ball to powder ratio of 3:1.In the next stage, the required amount (5, 15, 25 vol%) of the prepared amorphous reinforcement was blended with pure Al powder in a planetary ball milling machine (without balls) for 1 h at 200 rpm.The blended composite powder mixture was then cold compacted into a cylindrical billet of diameter 36 mm and height 50 mm.The compacted billets were then sintered using the microwave sintering approach which employed the combined action of microwave and a microwave couple external heating source to rapidly heat the composite materials (to 823 K, which is less than the crystallization temperature of Ni60Nb40 amorphous alloy) in a short period of time (12 min).The sintered billets were then soaked at 673 K for 1 h and hot extruded at 623 K into cylindrical rods of diameter 8 mm on which the structural and mechanical property characterization were performed.The results of structural characterization (SEM microscopy and X-ray analyses) revealed the retention of the amorphous structure and the uniform distribution of the reinforcement without any interfacial reaction products (Figure 2).Structural dilatation and change in the aspect ratio of reinforcement in 25 vol% amorphous particle reinforced composite was also observed.The observed features were attributed to the local stress variations and the temperature gradients within the composite arising in-situ during hot extrusion, due to reduced inter-particle spacing.Electrical resistivity measurements were also conducted on pure Al and its composite samples.The results showed higher resistivity values for composites due to the disordered structure of the amorphous phase.However, these values were found to be less than that of the amorphous Ni-Nb alloys.The reported mechanical properties under indentation, tension, and compression loads are listed in Table 1.When compared to pure Al, the micro-hardness value of 25 vol% composite was increased by ~130%.Compression test results showed ~45%-100% enhancement in compression yield strength without fracture.The reported flow curves are shown in Figure 3. Further, it is also worth mentioning that the long extrusions obtained in this study were sufficient to investigate the tensile properties (gauge length 25 mm, diameter: 5 mm) and the report on the tensile behavior of amorphous alloy/glass-reinforced composites was the first of its kind.It showed that the increment in strengths (both yield strength and ultimate strength) did not follow an increasing trend with reinforcement volume fraction.It showed that a minimum critical volume fraction of reinforcement was required for strength enhancement.A maximum increase in strength by ~60% was obtained in 25 vol% composite.Unlike compression test, the tensile test results showed ductility reduction (however not drastic as ceramic particle reinforced Al-MMCs) due to amorphous particle reinforcement addition.
The microscopic analysis of tension test failed samples (Figure 4) showed prominent ductile features and good interfacial bonding between the matrix and reinforcement.Particle breakage was also reported in 25 vol% composite.

Zr-Based Amorphous/Glassy Reinforcements
Scudino et al. [8] reported the synthesis, structure and compressive behavior of Zr-based metallic glass particle reinforced Al-matrix composites.The Zr57Ti8Nb2.5Cu13.9Ni11.1Al7.5 (at%) BMG reinforcement required for the study was prepared by ball-milling the elemental Zr, Ti, Nb, Cu, Ni, and Al powder for 120 h under argon atmosphere, with a ball to powder ratio of 13:1 and milling speed of 150 rpm.For making the composites, 40 and 60 vol% of the prepared amorphous powder was mixed with pure Al powder and the powder mixture was consolidated by hot pressing followed by hot extrusion.An extrusion ratio of 6:1 was employed and the extrusion was performed under argon atmosphere at a temperature 673 K, which is slightly lower than the crystallization temperature range (716-757 K) of the metallic glass reinforcement.The structural properties of the developed Al/Zr-BMG composites were investigated using X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy.The results of X-ray diffraction studies indicated the presence of only pure Al-crystalline peaks and the retention of the reinforcements' amorphous structure which confirmed that the crystallization of amorphous reinforcement was completely avoided during the hot pressing and extrusion.The SEM micrographs (Figure 5) showed no porosity and uniform distribution of the reinforcement particles.Particle clustering was also seen in the high volume fraction of amorphous reinforcement addition.The results of compressive properties reported in comparison to that of the melt spun Zr57Ti8Nb2.5Cu13.9Ni11.1Al7.5 ribbon and pure Al showed that the composite reinforced with 60% reinforcement exhibited superior strength (however less than the amorphous Zr-based ribbon) and work softening behavior.The microscopic features of the fractured samples investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 6) showed cracks in the reinforcing particles which occurred parallel to the compression direction.However, the Al matrix underwent large plastic deformation and displayed dimple rupture, which are both indicative of ductile fracture.

Cu-Based Amorphous/Glassy Reinforcements
Cu-based glassy material reinforced in Al-A520 alloy were developed by Dudina et al. [9] using high frequency induction sintering.In this study, the Cu54Zr36Ti10 (at%) metallic glass ribbons were prepared bythe arc melting/melt spinning process.The prepared amorphous alloy ribbons were then cut and ball-milled for 24 h.The cut ribbons were then mixed together with the Al-matrix alloy in a vibratory mill for 8 h.The composite powder mixture was processed using high frequency induction sintering at a temperature just below the crystallization temperature of the amorphous alloy.The processed composite materials were subjected to X-ray, electron microscopy and compression analysis.While the results of X-ray diffraction analysis indicated no additional phases and transformation of the amorphous phase, electron microscopic observations revealed uniform distribution of the amorphous phase with no preferred orientation.The compressive stress-strain curves as shown in Figure 7 (properties listed in Table 1) revealed promising strength enhancement by efficient load transfer and grain refinement.This was accompanied by a slight reduction in fracture strain.The fracture morphology of the compression test failed specimen indicated no metallic glass particle de-bonding from the matrix (Figure 7b,c).

Fe-Based Amorphous/Glassy Reinforcements
Fujii et al. [10] fabricated Fe-based (Fe72B14.4Si9.6Nb4)metallic glass particle reinforced Al-based composite materials using the friction stir processing method.The selection of the Fe-based metallic glass particle as reinforcement in this study was based on the fact that the glass transition temperature is relatively higher than the welding temperature (673-723 K) of the Al alloys.For the base matrix material, pure Al plates (1050-H24) with dimension 300 × 70 × 5 mm 3 were used.Structural and mechanical property measurements were performed and the results revealed coarsening of Al-grains due to the dispersion of Fe-based BMG particles.Further, it was also reported that dispersion of Fe-BMG particles had little effect on the hardness, although the results of hardness measurements showed improvement.This was attributed to the formation of Al13Fe4 precipitates in the stir zone due to the reaction between pure Al and Fe based metallic glass.
Aljerf et al. [14] prepared [(Fe0.5Co0.5)75B20Si5]96Nb4amorphous alloy reinforced Al6061 alloy composites using the high frequency induction sintering assisted powder metallurgy method.In this study, Fe-Co based amorphous alloy ribbons of the above mentioned composition were first ball-milled with Al-alloy and the Al/Fe-BMG composite mixture was then densified using induction sintering at 828 K. Similar to earlier studies, DSC and X-ray diffraction analyses were used to comprehend the crystallographic nature of the amorphous reinforcement and the results confirmed the retention of the amorphous structure in the composites (Figure 8).The flow curves under compression (Figure 9) clearly highlight the enhancement in strength properties due to amorphous reinforcement addition.The reported mechanical properties are listed in Table 1.Zheng et al. [11] produced Fe-based BMG particle reinforced 2024 Al-alloy composite using the powder metallurgy method.The Al 2024 alloy matrix and the amorphous Fe73Nb5Ge2P10C6B4 reinforcement materials required, were initially prepared using gas and water atomization respectively.The prepared powders were then ball milled under an argon atmosphere to fabricate the composite powder.Milling parameters include ball to powder ratio of 10:1, sun-disk rotation speed of 280 rpm, planetary-disk rotation speed of 480 rpm, process control agent of stearic acid and argon protective atmosphere.The composite powder mixture was then consolidated and sintered at 823 K, 400 MPa in a 20 mm diameter stainless steel die using induction heating for 30 min.The sintered billet was hot extruded at 823 K at an extrusion ratio of 10:1.Structural characterization showed the distribution of refined amorphous particles and the nanostructure Al-2024 matrix with clear interface between the matrix and amorphous reinforcement (Figure 10).Compression property measurements conducted on the composite samples showed enhanced yield and fracture strength resulting from the nanostructure of the Al-matrix and the uniform distribution of the amorphous reinforcement particles.In a recent study, Marko et al. [12] reinforced Al-2024 alloy with different volume fractions of gas atomized Fe49.9Co35.1Nb7.7B4.5Si2.8glassy particles using the powder metallurgy method by hot pressing (for 10 min at 673 K, 500 MPa) followed by hot extrusion at the same temperature.Given that the crystallization temperature of the glass reinforcement is ~873 K, the sintering temperature was far below the crystallization temperature and avoided crystallization of the glassy particles during sintering.This is yet another work that after ref. [7] investigated the room temperature tensile properties which indicated a 27% and 20% increase in yield and ultimate strengths respectively (listed in Table 1), when compared to the unreinforced alloy matrix.The ductility of the glass particle reinforced composite (range between 5% and 10%) was lower than that of the unreinforced alloy.Nevertheless, the glass particle reinforced composites have a definite advantage over the conventional ceramic reinforced composites, as the conventional composites usually have negligible/no ductility.[11], with permission from © Elsevier).

Mg-Based Amorphous/Glassy Reinforcements
Wang et al. [13] reinforced Mg65Cu20Zn5Y10 (at%) glassy particles in pure Al matrix.Injection cast Mg65Cu20Zn5Y10 metallic glass rods were ball-milled to produce metallic glass powder particles.10 and 30 vol% of the particles were mixed with pure Al powder and ball-milled to form composite powder (for 10 h with a ball-to-powder ration of 10:1).Uniaxial hot pressing was used to compact the composite powder in a vacuum at 453 K (falls in the super-cooled liquid region of the Mg-glassy particles) and 700 MPa.Uniform distribution of the glassy particles and good interfacial characteristics were observed.The room temperature compressive properties showed a yield strength increment by a factor of ~3 (203 MPa) in the 10 vol% composite (when compared to the unreinforced Al), along with a compressive deformation of ~25% (Table 1).Theoretical strength estimation using modified shear lag (MSL) model was used to explain the strengthening effect which showed good agreement with the experimental data.It was concluded that dislocation strengthening was the dominant strengthening mechanism in the developed composites.

Preparation and Characterization of Amorphous/Glass Reinforced Mg-MMCs
Dudina et al. [15] initiated the work on reinforcing amorphous/metallic glass in magnesium matrix.The effect of 15 vol%.Vitraloy 6, i.e., Zr57Nb5Cu15.4Ni12.6Al10amorphous alloy reinforcement in AZ31 Mg-alloy was investigated.The composite materials were prepared by using high frequency induction sintering under pressure.In the first stage, Zr-based metallic glass ribbons (prepared by induction melting followed by melt spinning) were cut into pieces and ball-milled in a low speed vibratory mill to prepare amorphous powder particles.The milling was performed for 15 h under an argon atmosphere.In the next stage, the ball milled Zr-based BMG powder (15 vol%) was mixed and milled with the cut ribbons of Mg-alloy.The milled composite powder mixture was then consolidated by using high frequency induction sintering under pressure (50 MPa) at a temperature of 713 K for 120 s.Similar to Al/BMG metal matrix composites, the selection of the sintering temperature was based on the crystallization temperature of Vitraloy 6 metallic glass reinforcement.The consolidated bulk Mg/Zr-BMG composite materials were then characterized for their structural and mechanical properties.Structural investigations involved X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy analyses.The results (Figure 11) revealed the retention of the reinforcement's amorphous structure and the uniform dispersion of the amorphous reinforcement without any interfacial reaction products or pores.This confirms the sound consolidation of the powder materials.Mechanical property measurements under indentation and compression loads were performed on samples 4 mm long and 2 × 2 mm 2 cross section.The reported results (Table 2) indicated a significant enhancement in strength properties due to the efficient load transfer and dislocation strengthening.Pure Mg-based composite materials reinforced with varying volume fractions of Ni60Nb40 (at%) metallic glass particles were synthesized by Jayalakshmi et al. [16] using the blend-press-sinter based powder metallurgy method.In the first stage, the amorphous Ni60Nb40 reinforcement required for the study was prepared by ball-milling.The processing details were similar to that mentioned in Jayalakshmi et al. [7].In the next stage, the required amount (3, 5, 10 vol%) of Ni60Nb40 BMG reinforcement was mixed with pure Mg powder and the mixture was blended in a planetary ball mill for 1 h.This was followed by the densification of the blended composite powder using uniaxial cold compaction and rapid microwave sintering.A sintering time of 12 min 30 s was selected for microwave sintering so as to reach the sintering temperature of 823 K, which is below the crystallization temperature of the Ni60Nb40 reinforcement.The sintered billets were then hot extruded at 623 K into cylindrical rods of 8 mm diameter on which the structural and mechanical property investigations were performed.The results of structural characterization by X-ray analysis, optical and electron microscopy revealed matrix grain refinement (Figure 12), uniform distribution of reinforcement at low volume fraction and agglomeration at high volume fractions (Figure 13), absence of interfacial reaction production (Figure 13d) and the retention of the reinforcement's amorphous structure at all volume fractions (Figure 14a).The results of X-ray analyses also indicated the influence of the amorphous reinforcement in changing the dominant crystallographic orientation of the Mg-matrix (Figure 14b).It was reported that the basal planes of the composites were not aligned entirely parallel to the extrusion as generally would be in the case of extruded magnesium materials.
The results of micro-hardness and compression tests (listed in Table 2) showed a remarkable increment with increasing amount of amorphous reinforcement.This behavior was attributed to the inherent high hardness, strength and elastic strain limit of the amorphous reinforcement.Recently, pure Mg reinforced with varying volume fractions of Ni50Ti50 (at%) were fabricated using the microwave sintering assisted powder metallurgy technique [17].The Ni50Ti50 amorphous reinforcement used in this study was prepared by ball milling the Ni and Ti powder particles for 55 h in a planetary ball milling machine.The ball milling parameters were similar to those used in reference [16].For composite fabrication, the required amounts (3, 6 and 10 vol%) of the prepared Ni50Ti50 amorphous reinforcement were mixed with pure Mg powder and the composite mixture was then cold compacted in an isostatic press.The compacted billet was then densified using microwave sintering.The sintered composite materials were then hot extruded into cylindrical rods and the samples cut from the cylindrical rods were subjected to X-ray, electron microscopy and mechanical property characterization.The SEM observations indicated a fair distribution of amorphous reinforcements with a clear matrix/reinforcement interface (Figure 15).The reported mechanical properties are listed in Table 2 which indicated superior strength properties due to amorphous Ni50Ti50 reinforcement addition (Figure 16).The tensile properties of such amorphous particle reinforced magnesium composites were reported for the first time in the case of Ni50Ti50 amorphous particles reinforced magnesium composites.The results showed ~98% increase in tensile yield strength and ~50% increase in the ultimate strength.While the tensile ductility was adversely affected, the reported properties were comparable or superior to that of ceramic particle reinforced Mg-MMCs.

Influence of Processing Method on the Mechanical Properties
Figure 18 compares the compressive properties of some of the amorphous alloy/metallic glass reinforced composites produced by different methods (as explained in the preceding paragraphs).Considering that in the graph (y-axis) the strength is normalized, the mechanical properties of the composites seem to be dominated by the processing method.Those composites produced by high frequency induction sintering exhibit the highest strength properties, irrespective of the matrix or reinforcement volume fraction.The high frequency induction sintering method is a rapid sintering method with high-temperature exposure and application of pressure over a short duration of time.Amongst the strength of the three composites produced by the high frequency induction sintering method, composites with Mg-and Fe-based glassy particles exhibit the highest strength, which could be due to the higher thermal stability, and enhanced glass formation characteristics of the alloy that may impart a better structural stability during processing, which would in turn improve the mechanical properties.The next best properties are observed in those composites produced by another unconventional rapid sintering method, i.e., microwave sintering, followed by hot extrusion.The method can also produce composites in larger dimensions such that the tensile behavior of the composites can also be studied.Composites produced by this method also show enhanced mechanical properties.These results highlight the fact that rapid sintering is essential to achieve an improved strengthening effect for composites reinforced with amorphous alloy/metallic glass reinforcements, as they can minimize interaction time with the matrix, promote rapid sintering, reduce porosity/defects, and retain an amorphous structure, resulting in an efficient load bearing capacity of the inherently high strength amorphous alloy/metallic glass reinforcements.Overall, the mechanical properties of the developed new composites are promising and should be designed so as to compensate for the disadvantages faced by conventional MMCs and at the same time utilize the superior properties of the glassy materials.A synergistic effect of superior properties of the matrix and reinforcement is expected to give rise to novel and advanced hybrid materials.

Conclusions
In most of the studies reviewed in this article, the incorporation of metallic glass reinforcement into light metal matrices (Al or Mg) enhanced the mechanical properties.The reported mechanical property enhancement was attributed to the inherent superior mechanical properties of the amorphous/metallic glass reinforcement.Further, the absence of interfacial reaction products (unlike conventional light metal matrix composites) also contributes towards the improvement of the composite properties.The method of processing the composite seems to play an influential role in defining the resulting properties.Composites produced by rapid processing methods such as high frequency induction sintering and rapid microwave sintering showed superior properties to those produced by conventional methods.Hence, by critically designing the nature and incorporation of metallic glass reinforcement with superior properties, the limitations faced by conventional metal matrix composite materials can be overcome.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) Optical micrographs of Ni-Nb-Ta metallic glass ribbon reinforced A356 alloy based composite; (b) X-ray diffractograms of Ni-Nb-Ta metallic glass ribbon reinforced Al-matrix composite in comparison with the melt spun Ni-Nb-Ta amorphous alloy and as-cast A356 alloy (reprinted from Lee et al. 2004 [4], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Results of microstructural (a-d) analyses conducted on Al-matrix composites reinforced with Ni60Nb40 metallic glass powder, Results of X-ray diffraction analyses (e) conducted on Al-matrix composites reinforced with Ni60Nb40 metallic glass powder (reprinted from Jayalakshmi et al. 2014 [7], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. (a,b) Low magnification and (c,d) high magnification fractographs of Al-Ni60Nb40 composites fractured under tensile loads.White arrows indicate better interfacial bonding between particle and matrix with no particle debonding in (a & b), small sized particles remaining intact marked as 'A' in (b & c), high aspect ratio particles undergoing multiple cracking and fracture in (c) and vein patterns caused by strain localization in amorphous particles in (d) (reprinted from Jayalakshmi et al. 2014 [7], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.(a) DSC thermograms and (b) X ray diffractograms of Al matrix composite reinforced with Fe-based metallic glass compared to Al 6061 alloy and the Fe-based metallic glass powder (reprinted from Aljerf et al. 2012 [14], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Compression flow curves of Al matrix composite reinforced with Fe-based metallic glass compared to as cast and heat treated Al 6061 alloy (reprinted from Aljerf et al. 2012 [14], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.SEM micrographs of Al 2024 alloy reinforced with Fe based metallic glass.(a) Low magnification and (b) high magnification; (c) TEM image showing the interfacial characteristics (reprinted from Zheng et al. 2014 [11], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.(a) X-ray diffractograms and (b) SEM micrograph of Zr-based glassy particle reinforced AZ91 Mg-alloy composite prepared by high frequency induction heating under pressure.Metallic glass particles are marked with black arrows in (b) (reprinted from Dudina et al. 2009 [15], with permission from © Elsevier).

**
Number in brackets represents the tensile properties.

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.(a) Grain characteristics of pure Mg, and (b-d) its composite reinforced with different amounts of Ni60Nb40 amorphous reinforcement (reprinted from Jayalakshmi et al. 2014 [16], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.SEM images showing the distribution of Ni60Nb40 amorphous particles in Mg matrix composites.White arrow in (e) represents clustering of particles.(reprinted from Jayalakshmi et al. 2014 [16], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 14 .
Figure 14.(a) XRD diffractograms of Mg-Ni60Nb40 composites showing the retention of amorphous structure at all volume fractions and (b) change in crystal orientation due to amorphous reinforcement addition.(reprinted from Jayalakshmi et al. 2014 [16], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 15 .
Figure 15.SEM micrographs showing the microstructural characteristics of: (a) pure Mg and its composite containing different amounts of Ni50Ti50 amorphous reinforcement (b,c).(reprinted from Sankaranarayanan et al. 2015 [17], with permission from © Elsevier).

Figure 18 .
Figure 18.Compressive properties of amorphous alloy/metallic glass reinforced composites produced by different methods.