Next Article in Journal
Effect of Trace Titanium on Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance of 25Mn High-Manganese Steel
Previous Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Chmielewski et al. Structure and Selected Properties of Arc Sprayed Coatings Containing In-Situ Fabricated Fe-Al Intermetallic Phases. Metals 2018, 8, 1059
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Chromium Ore Reduction Using Complex Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr Alloys

1
Laboratory of Pyrometallurgical Processes, Zh. Abishev Chemical-Metallurgical Institute, Karaganda 100009, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Metallurgy and Mining, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan
3
Laboratory of Metallurgical Melts, Zh. Abishev Chemical-Metallurgical Institute, Karaganda 100009, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2026, 16(5), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/met16050508
Submission received: 7 April 2026 / Revised: 28 April 2026 / Accepted: 4 May 2026 / Published: 8 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

This study investigates the thermodynamic and kinetic features of chromium reduction from chromium ore using complex Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr alloys as reducing agents for the refined ferrochrome production. The thermodynamic probability of Cr2O3 reduction by silicon and aluminum was evaluated using thermodynamic equilibrium calculations based on reference thermodynamic data, including determination of the standard Gibbs free energy change over the studied temperature range. The results showed that both reduction routes are thermodynamically feasible, while aluminum exhibits a higher affinity for oxygen and a greater reducing capacity. The thermal behavior of chromium ore and its mixtures with Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr alloys was studied by differential thermal and thermogravimetric analysis. The use of Al–Si–Cr, especially in briquetted form, was found to shift several thermal transformation stages to lower temperatures and to reduce the apparent activation energy of the high-temperature interaction stages compared with Fe–Si–Cr-containing mixtures. The obtained results indicate that Al–Si–Cr alloy is a promising complex reductant for intensifying chromium recovery and improving process conditions in refined ferrochrome production.

1. Introduction

The production of iron and steel is one of the largest and most resource-intensive areas of the modern metallurgical industry. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the global steel and pig iron production in 2024 reached approximately 3200 million tons (1300 million tons of iron and 1900 million tons of steel) [1]. In 2022, Kazakhstan produced 2.92 million tons of pig iron and 4.15 million tons of raw steel. According to the USGS, JSC ArcelorMittal Temirtau, one of the country’s major steel producers, had an annual production capacity of 5.7 million tons of pig iron and 3.4 million tons of raw steel [2]. At the same time, a stable increase in the production of a number of steels is observed worldwide due to various technical needs [3].
Such production volumes create a high and stable demand for alloying materials. One of the most widely used and important elements for steel alloying is chromium, which, as part of ferrochrome, is used in the production of various steel grades [4].
The primary use of ferrochrome is in the production of stainless steels, which accounts for approximately 80–85% of total ferrochrome consumption [5,6,7]. This is because ferrochrome is the primary industrial source of chromium, which is added to steel to create a complex of valuable performance properties, primarily corrosion resistance, heat resistance, and scale resistance [6,8].
The effectiveness of chromium alloying is determined by its content in the alloy. The chromium concentration has a decisive influence on the formation of a protective oxide film and the metal’s stability in aggressive environments [9]. In general, the higher the chromium content in the alloy, the more heat-resistant and corrosion-resistant it becomes. Various steels can contain from 12 to 35% of chromium. However, excessively high chromium contents may adversely affect certain mechanical properties of the alloy. Therefore, when producing special and stainless steel grades, not only is the total chromium content important, but also the quality of the introduced ferroalloy, including its carbon content and associated impurities [6,9].
The main raw material for the ferrochrome production is chromium ores. Chromium in chrome ores is mainly associated with chromite-type spinels. According to the USGS, 47 million metric tons of chrome ore were mined worldwide in 2024, with total estimated reserves of 1.2 billion metric tons. Kazakhstan is the world leader in chrome ore reserves and one of the leading producers, with production amounting to 6.5 million metric tons in 2024, with 320 million metric tons of reserves in the Republic [10]. Kazakhstan is also the undisputed world leader in ferrochrome production. According to the USGS, in 2022 Kazakhstan produced 1.2 million metric tons of high-, medium-, and low-carbon ferrochrome at the Aktobe and Aksu ferroalloy plants, both part of Eurasian Resources Group LLP JSC TNK Kazchrome [2].
Thus, the presence of a developed raw material base and stable demand for chromium-containing alloys determines the relevance of improving technologies for producing ferrochrome, especially its refined grades intended for smelting high-quality steels.
In the steelmaking industry, refined grades of ferrochrome are used to produce stainless and corrosion-resistant steel grades: carbon-free (less than 0.06% C), low-carbon (0.06–0.50% C) and medium-carbon (0.50–4% C).
Modern steel quality requirements necessitate the production of ferrochrome with minimal carbon and impurity content, significantly complicating the technology of chromium recovery from oxide raw materials. There is increasing emphasis on carbon-free and low-carbon technologies to reduce environmental impacts and greenhouse gas emissions associated with production, and the search for alternative reducing agents is becoming increasingly important [11].
In this regard, processes that reduce carbon content both during alloy production and in subsequent processing stages are particularly important. Stainless steel production using vacuum oxygen and argon-oxygen decarburization is actively being developed in industry. These processes allow for the removal of C and Si during stainless steel production with acceptable Cr losses [6]. However, the use of such technologies does not eliminate the need to obtain the required quality of the starting chromium-containing material. Consequently, the selection of effective reduction processes and reducing agents remains a pressing issue.
Reduction processes for producing carbon-free and low-carbon ferrochrome require the use of reducing agents with high reactivity toward oxygen. Depending on the desired grade of ferrochrome, different types of reducing agents are used. For low-carbon ferrochrome, the process typically involves silicothermic reduction; aluminothermic methods are used less frequently. This preference is largely due to the lower cost of silicon sources and the ease of introducing silicon into the melt [11].
Silicon is typically added as a ferrosilicochrome alloy. Aluminum is typically introduced through recycled aluminum scrap. In the absence of local aluminum production or access to recycled aluminum feedstock, silicon remains the only practically viable reducing agent. It can be produced locally in quantities sufficient to support the production of low-carbon ferrochrome grades [12,13].
Along with technological factors, energy and environmental aspects of production are becoming increasingly important. The carbothermic process has historically been the primary method and is characterized by high energy consumption (up to 4700 kWh/t) and significant direct carbon emissions (up to 5.5 t CO2 eq/t FeCr). Metallothermic (silico- and aluminothermic) methods of chromium production do not directly emit CO2. However, aluminum production is extremely energy-intensive (alumina electrolysis), and aluminothermic methods are only environmentally feasible if inexpensive “green” aluminum or other alternatives are available [13,14,15]. In the context of the current transition to more environmentally friendly technologies, this increases interest in searching for alternative or combined reduction systems.
Due to the limitations of traditional reduction technologies, in recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the development and use of complex silicon- and aluminum-containing reducing agents and alloys that combine several active components. The use of complex reducing agents provides more flexible control over the chemical composition of the metal, helps reduce carbon-containing impurities in the target ferrochrome, and potentially reduces specific energy consumption due to more efficient reduction reactions.
In this regard, the aim of this study was a thermodynamic and kinetic investigation of chromium reduction in systems with a traditional silicon reducing agent and a new complex silicon–aluminum alloy. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the comparative evaluation of the thermodynamic characteristics of the Cr2O3 reduction reactions by silicon and aluminum, as well as in the identification of the characteristics of thermal transformations and changes in apparent activation energy in mixtures of chromium ore with reducing agents, including in the briquetted state.

2. Materials and Methods

This study employed a set of thermodynamic and thermoanalytical methods aimed at assessing the possibility of using complex silicon–aluminum chromium-containing alloys as reducing agents in the production of refined grades of ferrochrome.
The object of the study was chrome ore, the average chemical composition of which is presented in Table 1. These characteristics were obtained in the certified laboratory of Zh. Abishev Chemical-Metallurgical Institute (Karaganda, Kazakhstan) using various analysis methods, including the MAX- GVM X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (SPA “Spectron”, Saint Petersburg, Russia).
The phase composition of the ore sample was analyzed using an Empyrean X-ray diffractometer (Malvern PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands). The phase composition data are presented in Figure 1 and Table 2.
The results show that the main phase is represented by magnesiochromite (MgCr2O4) and chromite (FeCr2O4), as well as the rock-forming minerals serpentine (Mg3Si2H4O9), brucite (Mg(OH)2), sapphirine (Mg3.5Al9Si1.5O20), and spinel (MgAl2O4), which is largely concentrated in the ore.
As reducing agents, complex silicon–chromium-containing alloys were examined, including the conventional ferrosilicochromium (FeSiCr) and a new complex aluminosilicochromium alloy (AlSiCr). The composition of the reducing agents is given in Table 3.
This study involved a thermodynamic evaluation of the reduction reactions of chromium oxide with silicon and aluminum. The overall reactions of silicothermic and aluminothermic reduction were considered as the baseline reactions.
The thermodynamic feasibility of chromium oxide reduction by silicon and aluminum was evaluated using equilibrium thermodynamic calculations performed in HSC Chemistry software (Version 10) over the temperature range of 0–2500 °C. The temperature dependences of standard Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) were analyzed for both reactions.
The kinetic characteristics of thermal transformations in the chrome ore–reducing agent system were also investigated by differential thermal analysis. For this purpose, four charge mixtures with a particle size of 0–0.15 mm were prepared:
  • chromium ore;
  • a mixture of chromium ore and FeSiCr;
  • a mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr;
  • a briquetted mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr.
Briquetting was applied only to the AlSiCr-containing mixture because this complex alloy contains several active reducing components and a more heterogeneous fine particle structure, for which closer interparticle contact is especially important. In contrast, FeSiCr is a conventional dense alloy reductant commonly used without preliminary briquetting; therefore, the briquetting effect was primarily evaluated for the novel AlSiCr system. Prior to briquetting, the powder mixtures were manually mixed to obtain the most uniform possible distribution of components.
Differential thermal analysis was carried out using a Q-1500D MOM thermogravimetric analyzer (derivatograph) (MOM, Budapest, Hungary) based on the Paulik–Paulik–Erdey system in an oxidizing atmosphere over the temperature range of 20–1150 °C. Oxidizing atmosphere ensured stable baseline operation of the derivatograph and reproducible comparison between samples. The oxidizing atmosphere was used to ensure stable baseline conditions and reproducibility of DTA measurements. It allows observation of initial physicochemical transformations (dehydration, phase transitions) prior to the onset of reduction processes. Calcined aluminum oxide was used as the reference material. The sample holder was an inert aluminosilicate ceramic crucible composed mainly of Al2O3 (99.8%) with SiO2, FeO, and MgO impurities, and suitable for derivatographic measurements up to 1200 °C. During DTA recording, sample mass changes were monitored simultaneously. The derivatographic curves include three simultaneously recorded parameters: temperature (T), mass change (TG), and differential thermal effect (DTA), which together reflect the sequence of physicochemical transformations occurring in the sample during heating.
To interpret the derivatographic curves and determine the kinetic parameters, a non-isothermal kinetics approach based on the analysis of the ascending branch of the thermal effect was used. This approach was proposed and described in detail in the authors’ work [16]. When calculating the kinetic parameters, it was taken into account that in the case of exothermic processes, the peak maximum corresponds to a stage close to the completion of the reaction; therefore, a section not exceeding 50% of the peak height was used for processing. For each thermal effect, the baseline was taken as a straight reference line connecting the sections of the DTA curve immediately before the onset and after the completion of the corresponding peak, as shown schematically in Figure 2. The parameter Δt was defined as the vertical distance between the experimental DTA curve and this reference line at a selected temperature point on the ascending branch of the peak. This approach minimizes the influence of instrumental drift and was applied in accordance with the method described in [16].
The kinetic parameters of thermal processes accompanied by the release or absorption of heat were calculated using differential thermal analysis (DTA) curves. The resulting relationships were used to determine the apparent activation energy of the stages of thermal transformation of chrome ore and its interaction with various reducing agents.
Based on the experimental data, dependences were plotted in the coordinates lgΔt − 1/T, where Δt characterizes the deviation of the DTA curve from the specified direction, and T is the absolute process temperature. The apparent activation energies of individual stages of thermal transformations were calculated from the slope of the linear sections of these dependences. The obtained results were used to comparatively assess the influence of the reducing agent composition and the batch preparation method on the temperature ranges of the processes and the energy parameters of component interactions.
The applied approach provides comparative apparent activation energy estimates from non-isothermal DTA data and was used primarily for relative comparison of the studied systems rather than for rigorous kinetic modeling.

3. Results and Discussion

To thermodynamically evaluate the feasibility of metallothermic chromium reduction, the overall reactions of chromium oxide reduction by silicon and aluminum contained in the complex chromium-containing alloys were examined. Silicothermic reduction is described by reaction (1):
Cr2O3 + 3/2Si = 2Cr + 3/2SiO2
The thermodynamic feasibility of reaction (1) was evaluated using equilibrium calculations performed in HSC Chemistry software in the temperature range of 0–2500 °C. The calculated values of standard Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) remain negative throughout the whole investigated range, varying from −231.500 kJ at 0 °C to −188.900 kJ at 2500 °C. This confirms that the reduction of chromium oxide by silicon is thermodynamically feasible under high-temperature conditions.
Next, the possibility of aluminothermic reduction of chromium oxide was considered. The overall reaction of the process is described by the following Equation (2):
Cr2O3 + 2Al = 2Cr + Al2O3
The thermodynamic feasibility of aluminothermic reduction was evaluated in the same manner using HSC Chemistry software. The calculated ΔG° values for reaction (2) remain significantly more negative than those for silicothermic reduction over the entire temperature range, changing from −530.100 kJ at 0 °C to −389.700 kJ at 2500 °C. These results indicate a stronger affinity of aluminum for oxygen and a higher reducing ability toward chromium oxide.
A comparison of the calculated thermodynamic parameters shows that both reactions are feasible in the studied temperature range. However, the aluminothermic route demonstrates markedly lower Gibbs free energy values than the silicothermic route, indicating its superior thermodynamic efficiency.
It should be emphasized that these reactions represent simplified model systems. Real metallurgical processes involve multicomponent oxide and alloy phases, where the Gibbs energy differs from that of pure substances. Therefore, the present thermodynamic analysis is intended for qualitative comparison of reduction tendencies rather than for precise prediction of equilibrium compositions.
Based on the obtained equations, temperature dependences of the change in the standard Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constant were constructed for the reactions of chromium oxide reduction with silicon and aluminum. The corresponding graphical dependences are presented in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, the Gibbs free energy values for both reactions remain negative throughout the studied temperature range. However, the aluminothermic reduction reaction is characterized by considerably lower ΔG° values, indicating a stronger tendency for chromium oxide reduction.
Thus, the results of the thermodynamic analysis show that the reduction of chromium oxide by both silicon and aluminum in the studied temperature range is thermodynamically probable. Moreover, the combined presence of these components in the complex chromium-containing alloy as a reducing agent creates favorable conditions for the reduction processes during the production of refined ferrochrome grades.
However, the thermodynamic probability of the process does not allow for a full assessment of the interactions between the charge components under heating conditions. Therefore, the next stage of the study was to investigate the kinetic characteristics of thermal transformations in the chrome ore-reducing agent system using differential thermal analysis.
The results of derivatographic studies of the studied samples in the temperature range of 20–1150 °C are presented in the derivatograms in Figure 4, and the temperature ranges of the observed thermal effects are indicated in Table 4.
The thermal effects in Table 4 should be regarded as tentative, since DTA/TG data alone do not provide direct phase identification. The interpretation was based on the phase composition of the original chrome ore and known data on the thermal behavior of serpentine-containing and chromite-containing systems. Serpentine minerals are known to undergo dehydroxylation mainly above 500 °C, with characteristic thermal effects commonly observed in the range of approximately 550–800 °C [17,18]. Further heating may promote the formation of olivine/forsterite-type phases [17]. In chromite-bearing systems, high-temperature treatment can be accompanied by oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+, redistribution of Fe- and Cr-bearing oxide phases, and structural transformations of the spinel phase [19]. Therefore, the effects observed at 985–1080 °C were assigned only as possible chromospinel-related transformations.
Analysis of the obtained derivatograms showed that the thermal behavior of the initial chromium ore and charge mixtures is governed by successive dehydration, dehydroxylation, phase reconstruction, and solid-state interaction processes. The low-temperature endothermic effects (140–150 °C) are associated with the removal of physically adsorbed moisture. The intermediate region corresponds mainly to serpentine decomposition and destruction of hydrated silicate phases, accompanied by structural rearrangement of the ore matrix. At higher temperatures (800–1080 °C), exothermic and complex thermal effects are related to olivine formation, spinel restructuring, and intensified interaction between ore components and reducing alloys. The position and intensity of these effects depend on the chemical nature of the reductant and the contact conditions between particles.
For the chromium ore sample (Figure 4a), the initial endothermic effect at 130–150 °C corresponds to the removal of physically adsorbed moisture and is accompanied by a mass loss of about 1 mg (0.05%). A more pronounced mass loss occurs in the temperature range of 615–690 °C, associated with the dehydroxylation of serpentine minerals, reaching up to 40 mg (1.90%). At higher temperatures (800–900 °C), an exothermic effect is observed, which is attributed to the formation of Fe–Cr oxide solid solutions, accompanied by a mass decrease of approximately 50 mg (2.38%).
For the mixture of chromium ore and FeSiCr (Figure 4b), the thermal behavior remains generally similar to that of the initial ore. The low-temperature endothermic effect at 140–160 °C corresponds to moisture removal. However, compared to the pure ore, the main thermal effects are shifted toward higher temperatures. This behavior can be explained by the limited reactivity of FeSiCr under solid-state conditions at relatively low temperatures. Silicon contained in FeSiCr requires higher temperatures to become chemically active and to initiate reduction reactions with chromium oxides. In addition, the interaction between the ore and the alloy is controlled by diffusion processes, which are significantly intensified only at elevated temperatures. As a result, the onset of solid-phase interaction is delayed, leading to a shift in the corresponding thermal effects toward higher temperature regions.
Figure 4c shows the derivatogram of the mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr. The section on the DTA curve from the endothermic effect (140 °C) to the temperatures of the weak exothermic effect of 470–500 °C corresponds to the processes of release of hygroscopic and hydrated moisture, accompanied by a weight loss of 2 mg (0.10%) and 7 mg (0.36%), respectively. The endothermic effect at temperatures of 680–700 °C and the exothermic effect at temperatures of 830–850 °C with a sharp decrease in sample weight by 25 mg (1.29%) and 30 mg (1.56%), respectively, repeat the picture of the previous derivatograms. With a further increase in temperature, a wave of exothermic effects can be detected on the derivatogram: 985 °C, 1000 °C. Presumably, the appearance of these effects is associated with the onset of interaction between the lower oxides of the ore and the reducing agent, as a similar pattern is not reflected in the derivatograms above. These effects are characterized by a smooth increase in weight by 23 mg (1.19%) and 12 mg (0.62%), respectively.
For the briquetted mixture (Figure 4d), a noticeable shift in thermal effects toward lower temperatures is observed compared to the non-briquetted systems. In particular, the effect associated with serpentine decomposition appears at approximately 490 °C, while the exothermic effect corresponding to olivine formation is observed at around 800 °C instead of 835–840 °C. At temperatures above 940 °C, a pronounced exothermic peak at 1080 °C is recorded, accompanied by an additional mass loss of about 7 mg (0.36%), indicating intensified high-temperature reactions. This behavior indicates enhanced interphase interaction due to reduced diffusion distances and improved physical contact between particles after briquetting. As a result, physicochemical processes in the system proceed at lower temperatures and with higher intensity, confirming the effectiveness of briquetting for systems containing complex AlSiCr reducing agents.
The total mass loss across the studied temperature range varies significantly between samples: approximately 7.04% for chromium ore, 5.38% for the FeSiCr mixture, 5.14% for the AlSiCr mixture, and 4.17% for the briquetted system. This trend confirms that the presence of complex reducing agents and especially briquetting leads to more controlled thermal transformations and reduced overall mass loss, indicating more efficient interaction between charge components.
To quantitatively assess the kinetic characteristics of the identified stages, the temperature ranges of individual thermal effects and the magnitude of the deviation Δt from the baseline were determined from the experimental curves relative to the constructed local baseline. Based on this, graphs of the dependence in lgΔt − 1/T coordinates were constructed, which are presented in Figure 5.
The apparent activation energies of the corresponding processes were calculated using the slope of the linear sections. The results are presented in Table 5. It should be noted that the non-linearity of the obtained lgΔt − 1/T plots indicates that the thermal transformations in the studied systems do not follow a single-step mechanism but involve several overlapping physicochemical processes. Therefore, the calculated activation energies should be interpreted as apparent values corresponding to specific temperature intervals rather than true kinetic parameters of a single elementary reaction.
To visually compare the influence of the reducing agent composition and batch preparation method on the energy parameters of thermal transformations, Figure 6 shows the dependence of the apparent activation energy on temperature for all studied systems. This graph summarizes the results presented in Table 5 and allows one to trace the change in the energy barriers of individual process stages depending on the interaction conditions of the components.
As can be seen from Figure 6, the highest apparent activation energy values in the high-temperature region are characteristic of the mixture of chrome ore with FeSiCr. In the range of 800–835 °C, the Eact value for this mixture is 116.218 kJ/mol, which indicates the greatest energetic difficulties in the process. When using AlSiCr in a comparable temperature range of 800–840 °C, the apparent activation energy value decreases to 69.990 kJ/mol. For the briquetted mixture of chrome ore with a silicon–aluminum reducing agent in the range of 770–800 °C, the Eact value is 61.739 kJ/mol, which is the lowest among the high-temperature stages of the studied reducing mixtures. This indicates more favorable kinetic conditions for the interaction of the charge components when using a complex alloy, especially in briquetted form.
Thus, the thermodynamic calculations and thermoanalytical observations show consistent tendencies. While thermodynamic analysis indicates the feasibility of chromium oxide reduction by both silicon and aluminum, the DTA results suggest that AlSiCr-containing systems exhibit earlier and energetically more favorable thermal interaction stages. Additional briquetting of the batch enhances this effect, shifting some of the thermal transformations to lower temperatures and reducing the energy barriers to the process. Taken together, this demonstrates the potential of using AlSiCr alloy in the production of refined ferrochrome grades.

4. Conclusions

A thermodynamic analysis revealed that the reduction of chromium oxide by both silicon and aluminum in the studied temperature range is thermodynamically probable. Moreover, the more negative Gibbs free energy change and the higher equilibrium constant values for the aluminothermic reaction compared to the silicothermic reaction indicate a higher affinity of aluminum for oxygen. This confirms the feasibility of combining silicon and aluminum in a complex chromium-containing alloy for the production of refined ferrochrome grades.
Differential thermal analysis data revealed that thermal transformations in chromium ore and mixtures containing it occur in stages. Systems containing a complex silicon–aluminum reducing agent, unlike mixtures with an FeSiCr reducing agent, typically exhibit additional high-temperature effects in the range of 985–1060 °C, associated with possible redistribution of Fe- and Cr-bearing oxide phases from chromospinel and the onset of lattice restructuring. For the briquetted mixture, a shift in several thermal effects toward lower temperatures was observed, indicating intensified component interactions due to closer contact in the charge.
Calculation of the apparent activation energy showed that the use of a complex silicon–aluminum chromium-containing alloy creates more favorable kinetic conditions for the process compared to a siliceous reducing agent. Thus, in the high-temperature range, the apparent activation energy for a mixture of chromium ore and ferrosilicon chrome is 116.218 kJ/mol, while for a briquetted mixture with AlSiCr, it decreases to 61.739 kJ/mol. This indicates lower energy barriers and earlier interaction between charge components.
Thus, the results of the thermodynamic and kinetic studies are consistent and confirm the potential of using AlSiCr as a complex chromium-containing alloy in the production of refined ferrochrome grades. Additional briquetting of the batch facilitates further process intensification, shifting individual stages to lower temperatures, and reducing the apparent activation energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., A.B. (Alibek Baisanov) and N.V.; methodology, A.A., A.B. (Alibek Baisanov); validation, A.A., A.B. (Alibek Baisanov), B.K. and N.V.; formal analysis, A.A. and N.V.; investigation, A.A., B.K., A.B. (Aidana Baisanova), N.V. and Y.S.; data curation, A.A., N.V. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A. and A.B. (Aidana Baisanova); writing—review and editing, N.V., A.B. (Alibek Baisanov) and B.K.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, A.B. (Alibek Baisanov) and A.A.; project administration, A.B. (Alibek Baisanov). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Committee of Industry of the Ministry of Industry and Construction of the Republic of Kazakhstan under program-targeted funding for scientific research for 2024–2026, BR23991563: “Creation of Innovative Resource-Saving Technologies for Mining and Integrated Processing of Mineral and Technogenic Raw Materials”.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tuck, C.C. Iron and Steel. In Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2025; pp. 94–95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Renaud, K.M. The Mineral Industry of Kazakhstan. In 2022 Minerals Yearbook; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2025; pp. 24.1–24.21. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stainless Steel Melt Shop Production Worldwide 2005–2022. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/223028/world-stainless-steel-production/ (accessed on 22 January 2025).
  4. Van Rooyen, G.T. The Potential of Chromium as an Alloying Element. In Proceedings of the 1st International Chromium Steel and Alloys Congress (INFACON 6), Cape Town, South Africa, 8–11 March 1992; Volume 2, pp. 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sariyev, O.; Tolymbekova, L.; Dossekenov, M.; Kelamanov, B.; Yessengaliyev, D.; Davletova, A.; Abdirashit, A. Analysis and Chromium Recovery from Ferrochrome Waste (Stockpiled Refined Ferrochrome Slags). Metals 2025, 15, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. du Preez, S.P.; van Kaam, T.P.M.; Ringdalen, E.; Tangstad, M.; Morita, K.; Bessarabov, D.G.; van Zyl, P.G.; Beukes, J.P. An Overview of Currently Applied Ferrochrome Production Processes and Their Waste Management Practices. Minerals 2023, 13, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Eric, R.H. Production of Ferroalloys. In Treatise on Process Metallurgy; Seetharaman, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2014; Volume 3, pp. 477–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gasik, M.I. Technology of Chromium and Its Ferroalloys. In Handbook of Ferroalloys; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 265–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, Y.; Shironita, S.; Souma, K.; Umeda, M. Effect of chromium content on the corrosion resistance of ferritic stainless steels in sulfuric acid solution. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Schulte, R.F. Chromium. In Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2025; pp. 58–59. [Google Scholar]
  11. Makhambetov, Y.; Sadyk, Z.; Zhakan, A.; Burumbayev, A.; Kabylkanov, S.; Myrzagaliyev, A.; Aubakirov, D.; Lu, N.; Akhmetov, A. Electric Arc Metallothermic Smelting of FeCr Using FeAlSiCa as a Reductant. Materials 2025, 18, 4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Weitz, H.; Garbers-Craig, A.M. Evaluation of the Furnace Method for the Production of Low Carbon Ferrochrome. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2016, 37, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lian, X.; Gao, H.; Shen, L.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Z. Life Cycle Assessment of Primary Aluminum Production. Processes 2025, 13, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Akhmetov, A.; Zulhan, Z.; Sadyk, Z.; Burumbayev, A.; Zhakan, A.; Kabylkanov, S.; Toleukadyr, R.; Saulebek, Z.; Ayaganova, Z.; Makhambetov, Y. Carbon-Free Smelting of Ferrochrome Using FeAlSiCa Alloy. Processes 2025, 13, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gautam, M.; Pandey, B.; Agrawal, M. Carbon Footprint of Aluminum Production. In Environmental Carbon Footprints; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 197–228. ISBN 9780128128497. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zatsepin, A.F.; Fotiev, A.A.; Dmitriev, I.A. On the assessment of the apparent activation energy of exothermic processes using derivatographic data. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 18, 2883–2885. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dlugogorski, B.Z.; Balucan, R.D. Dehydroxylation of serpentine minerals: Implications for mineral carbonation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Viti, C. Serpentine minerals discrimination by thermal analysis. Am. Mineral. 2010, 95, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Swanepoel, S.; Garbers-Craig, A.M.; de Villiers, J.P.R. The Oxidation Behavior of a Selection of South African Chromites. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 3726–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of chromium ore.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of chromium ore.
Metals 16 00508 g001
Figure 2. Scheme for determining temperature values and the magnitude of deviation of the DTA curve from a given direction [16].
Figure 2. Scheme for determining temperature values and the magnitude of deviation of the DTA curve from a given direction [16].
Metals 16 00508 g002
Figure 3. Dependence of the change in the standard Gibbs energy on temperature for the reactions of chromium reduction with silicon and aluminum.
Figure 3. Dependence of the change in the standard Gibbs energy on temperature for the reactions of chromium reduction with silicon and aluminum.
Metals 16 00508 g003
Figure 4. DTA/TG curves of the studied samples: (a) chromium ore; (b) chromium ore + FeSiCr; (c) chromium ore + AlSiCr; (d) briquetted mixture: chromium ore + AlSiCr.
Figure 4. DTA/TG curves of the studied samples: (a) chromium ore; (b) chromium ore + FeSiCr; (c) chromium ore + AlSiCr; (d) briquetted mixture: chromium ore + AlSiCr.
Metals 16 00508 g004
Figure 5. Semilogarithmic plots of DTA peak height versus reciprocal temperature: (a) chromium ore; (b) a mixture of chromium ore and FeSiCr; (c) a mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr; (d) a briquetted mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr. The numbers under the figures are the peak numbers according to Table 4.
Figure 5. Semilogarithmic plots of DTA peak height versus reciprocal temperature: (a) chromium ore; (b) a mixture of chromium ore and FeSiCr; (c) a mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr; (d) a briquetted mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr. The numbers under the figures are the peak numbers according to Table 4.
Metals 16 00508 g005
Figure 6. Dependence of apparent activation energy on temperature.
Figure 6. Dependence of apparent activation energy on temperature.
Metals 16 00508 g006
Table 1. Chemical composition of the chromium ore.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the chromium ore.
Content of Components, wt %
Cr2O3SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOPS
49.316.24.3110.70.9218.150.0070.01
Table 2. Phase composition data of ore.
Table 2. Phase composition data of ore.
Name of the MineralFormulaContent, %
MagnesiochromiteMgCr2O436.0
ChromiteFeCr2O420.4
SpinelMgAl2O416.1
SapphirineMg3.5Al9Si1.5O2013.1
SerpentineMg3Si2H4O911.3
BruciteMg(OH)23.1
Table 3. Chemical composition of the reducing agents.
Table 3. Chemical composition of the reducing agents.
Reducing AgentsContent of Components, wt %
CrSiAlCFe
AlSiCr36.9225.1114.411.48Rest
FeSiCr35.4034.00-0.2Rest
Table 4. Thermal effects of materials, °C.
Table 4. Thermal effects of materials, °C.
Peak
Number
Materials *Note
1234
1140150140140Removing natural moisture
2615690690490Probable serpentine decomposition
3840835840800Probable olivine formation
4--985-Possible segregation of Fe- and Cr-bearing oxide phases from chromospinel
5--10601080Possible onset of chromospinel lattice restructuring
* Materials: 1—chromium ore; 2—chromium ore + FeSiCr; 3—chromium ore + AlSiCr; 4—briquetted mixture: chromium ore + AlSiCr.
Table 5. Values of the apparent activation energy determined from the slope of the direct dependence of lg Δt − 1/T.
Table 5. Values of the apparent activation energy determined from the slope of the direct dependence of lg Δt − 1/T.
NoMaterialEquationCorrelation Coefficient REact,
kJ/mol
Temperature
Range, °C
1.Chromium orelnΔt = −63.75/T + 3.440.93891.22020–140
lnΔt = −209.22/T + 4.180.89644.006440–615
lnΔt = −1942.28/T + 19.020.958737.190800–840
2.A mixture of chromium ore and FeSiCrlnΔt = −0.13/T + 5.130.97150.00220–150
lnΔt = −1094.09/T + 12.970.969520.949610–690
lnΔt = −6069.44/T + 56.610.9538116.218800–835
3.A mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCrlnΔt = −68.02/T + 3.640.94551.30220–140
lnΔt = −1806.96/T + 19.920.967234.599640–690
lnΔt = −3655.42/T + 34.730.971169.990800–840
lnΔt = −2810.03/T + 23.830.938553.806935–985
lnΔt = −7337.86/T + 56.180.9154140.5051040–1060
4.A briquetted mixture of chromium ore and AlSiCr.lnΔt = −66.08/T + 3.540.94241.26520–140
lnΔt = −831.90/T + 12.080.953415.929430–490
lnΔt = −3224.31/T + 31.190.934661.739770–800
lnΔt = −2700.68/T + 22.340.885351.7121010–1080
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akuov, A.; Baisanov, A.; Kelamanov, B.; Baisanova, A.; Vorobkalo, N.; Samuratov, Y. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Chromium Ore Reduction Using Complex Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr Alloys. Metals 2026, 16, 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16050508

AMA Style

Akuov A, Baisanov A, Kelamanov B, Baisanova A, Vorobkalo N, Samuratov Y. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Chromium Ore Reduction Using Complex Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr Alloys. Metals. 2026; 16(5):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16050508

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akuov, Askhat, Alibek Baisanov, Bauyrzhan Kelamanov, Aidana Baisanova, Nina Vorobkalo, and Yerulan Samuratov. 2026. "Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Chromium Ore Reduction Using Complex Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr Alloys" Metals 16, no. 5: 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16050508

APA Style

Akuov, A., Baisanov, A., Kelamanov, B., Baisanova, A., Vorobkalo, N., & Samuratov, Y. (2026). Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Chromium Ore Reduction Using Complex Fe–Si–Cr and Al–Si–Cr Alloys. Metals, 16(5), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16050508

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop