Effects of Al or Mo Addition on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Fe-Rich Nonequiatomic FeCrCoMnNi High-Entropy Alloy

In this work, a Fe-rich nonequiatomic Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 high-entropy alloy was successfully prepared based on phase analysis and cost reduction. Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 high-entropy alloy with a single-phase face-centered cubic (FCC) structure was strengthened by the addition of 11 at.% Al or 10 at.% Mo, and the variations of phase and mechanical properties of the strengthened alloys were subsequently investigated. It has been found that the addition of 11 at.% Al led to the formation of FCC and body-centered cubic (BCC) dual-phase structure in the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, while its yield strength (σ0.2) and tensile strength increased from 158 ± 4 MPa and 420 ± 20 MPa to 218 ± 7 MPa and 507 ± 16 MPa, respectively, as compared to the single-phase FCC structure Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy. The addition of 10 at.% Mo introduced intermetallic compounds of μ and σ phases, which resulted in improved yield strength of 246 ± 15 MPa for the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy. However, the alloy exhibited premature brittle fracture due to the existence of a large number of intermetallic compounds, which led to deteriorated tensile strength of 346 ± 15 MPa. The findings of this work suggest that the introduced secondary phases by the addition of Al and Mo can effectively strengthen the high-entropy alloy; however, the number of intermetallic compounds should be controlled to achieve a combination of high strength and good ductility, which provides a reference for the follow-up study of nonequiatomic high-entropy alloys.


Introduction
The design and research of traditional alloys have long been limited to the idea of using one or two principal elements as the matrix which is supplemented with additional minor elements to adjust the performance [1][2][3][4]. The traditional alloy design concept was challenged since the design concept of high-entropy alloy (HEA) was proposed and the HEA was successfully prepared. Conventional wisdom holds that high-entropy alloys (HEAs) consist of five or more principal elements with each contributing 5 at.% to 35 at.%, usually at an equal atomic ratio or near equal atomic ratio [5][6][7][8][9]. The mixing entropy of the solid solution phase in the high-entropy alloy is much higher than that of the intermetallic compound at elevated temperatures. Therefore, it is easier to form a simple solid solution phase, such as the face-centered cubic (FCC) phase and body-centered cubic (BCC) phase [10][11][12][13][14]. In addition, high-entropy alloys also have delayed diffusion and FeCrCoMnNi high-entropy alloys, in which σ and µ phases are two different intermetallic compounds [49]. The σ phase tends to completely transform into µ phase when further increasing the content of Mo, contributing to an (FCC + µ)-structured alloy, which is consistent with the thermodynamic calculation results by Bae et al. [36]. Shun et al. reported that the strengthening effect of the intermetallic compound µ was approximately two times higher than that of the intermetallic compound σ on the compressive yield strength of the CoCrFeNiMo x high-entropy alloys [30]. Liu et al. found that the compressive yield strength increased from 200 MPa to 300 MPa by the solid solution strengthening and intermetallic compound strengthening when the Mo content was increased [50]. However, the formation of intermetallic compound µ when further increasing the Mo content could increase the compressive yield strength to~1000 MPa. Through thermodynamic calculations, Liu et al. reported that the CoCrFeNiMo x alloy was composed of FCC + σ + µ at the Mo content of 5.44 at.% [51]. Wu et al. performed thermodynamic calculations on CoCrFeNiMo x alloys at 900 • C and found that the intermetallic compounds µ together with FCC matrix existed when the Mo content was close to 10% and the Cr content was as high as 15% [49]. These findings are consistent with the experimental work by Ming et al. who determined the disappearance of intermetallic compounds σ when the Mo content was increased to 10 at.% for the CoCrFeNiMo x alloys [6]. Based on the above analysis, the content of Al could be controlled at~11 at.% to introduce sufficient strengthening-phase BCC while preventing the formation of brittle B2 phase. The content of the Mo element could be controlled at 10 at.% to make sure the σ phase is completely transformed into the µ phase to fully utilize the strengthening effect of the latter on the yield strength. Moreover, the research on the tensile properties of single-µ-phase-containing high-entropy alloys is scarcely found even though their compressive properties are commonly reported [30,50]. The addition of Al or Mo will inevitably reduce the contents of other elements in the alloy. As suggested above, the precious metal Co could be reduced by using Ni with a relatively low price and a similar effect for the stability of the FCC phase instead. The element Mn can easily burn during the melting process and it is detrimental to the stability of the FCC phase [38]. Therefore, priority should be given to reducing the contents of Co and Mn while keeping the content of Fe, Cr, and Ni unchanged for the addition of the Al and Mo to strengthen the prepared high-entropy alloys.
Based on the literature review and analysis, it is convincing that the preparation of the nonequiatomic FeCrCoMnNi system alloys with a high content of Fe and a low content of Cr, Co, and Mn is highly possible and cost-efficient. The aim of this investigation is therefore proposed as follows: (1) Try to experimentally prove it is feasible to prepare Fe-rich nonequiatomic FeCrCoMnNi single-phase FCC-structured high-entropy alloys; if so, the preparation of the alloys with a high content of Fe (for instance 40%) and a low content of Cr, Co, and Mn would reduce the cost. (2) Strengthening studies will be conducted using Al and Mo for the cost-efficient Fe-rich nonequiatomic FeCrCoMnNi alloys. However, the investigations on the preparation and characterization of Fe-rich nonequiatomic FeCr-CoMnNi single-phase high-entropy alloys and the strengthening studies with the addition of Al and Mo, which is critical to the follow-up research of cost-efficient nonequiatomic high-entropy alloys, are scarcely reported.
In this investigation, a Fe-rich nonequiatomic Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 high-entropy alloy was successfully prepared based on the above phase analysis and the cost reduction, and then 11 at.% Al or 10 at.% Mo was added on this basis to obtain the strengthened Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 or Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 nonequiatomic high-entropy alloys. The effect of Al or Mo on the microstructure, Vickers hardness and tensile properties of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy was investigated by metallographic microscope, X-ray diffractometer (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), Vickers hardness tester, and universal testing machine. The variations of microstructure and mechanical properties were analyzed, which could provide a reference for the follow-up study of nonequiatomic high-entropy alloys.

Materials
Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 , Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 , and Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 high-entropy alloys were prepared by melting and casting in an intermediate frequency induction furnace. The purity of all raw materials was ≥99.9%. Mo and Cr were replaced by MoFe and CrFe alloys to lower the melting point, and they were washed several times by using 5% acetic acid solution and ethanol. Before smelting, argon was used to flush the furnace several times and then evacuated to 10 −1 Pa. Finally, an ingot with a diameter of 55 mm was obtained. The composition of the cast ingot was analyzed by using an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) installed on the ZEISS EVO MA15 scanning electron microscope (SEM). Each EDS measurement was conducted on the polished sample surface with an area of~0.0625 mm 2 (250 µm × 250 µm). For each high-entropy alloy, at least six repeated measurements were performed on three polished samples to ensure reliability. The composition of the ingot is shown in Table 1.

Microstructure Observation and Phase Analysis
XJP-3C metallurgical microscope, ZEISS EVO MA15 scanning electron microscope (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to analyze the microstructure of the material. The size of the sample for microstructural analysis was 10 mm × 9 mm × 2 mm, and the sample was polished with 400-2000# sandpaper in turn and then mechanically polished on cloth using diamond paste. Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy was electrolytically etched in a 10% oxalic acid solution with a 6 V DC power supply for 40-80 s. Afterwards, the microstructure was observed using an optical microscope and SEM. The other two high-entropy alloys with Al or Mo were etched by aqua regia with a corrosion time of 4-8 s. X Pert PRO MPD X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Cu target, wavelength λ = 1.5418 Å) with a step size of 0.0167 • was used to characterize the phase composition of the high-entropy alloys.

Mechanical Properties
An HVS-1000 digital display microhardness tester was used to measure the Vickers hardness with the testing load of 200 g and duration at the maximum load of 15 s. The Vickers hardness was obtained by averaging the values of 20 points made on the sample surface with an equal interval of 0.5 mm. A WDW-100E universal testing machine was employed to test the tensile properties of the alloy with the crosshead velocity of 0.25 mm/min. The gauge length of the tensile samples was 17 mm, and the thickness and width of the gauge were 2 mm and 3.5 mm, respectively. Note that the strain of the tensile samples was calculated by the recorded crosshead displacement and the gauge length since no extensometer was used during the test. For each condition, three repeated measurements were conducted to ensure reproducibility. After the test, the elongation at fracture (A) and reduction of area (Z) of the fractured samples were measured. The fracture surface of the tensile samples was then observed by using the aforementioned SEM.

X-ray Diffraction
The XRD patterns of the three high-entropy alloys in the as-cast state are shown in Figure 1. It reveals that the three alloys all contain FCC-structured matrix, i.e., (Fe, Ni) phase, according to the JCPDS card 23 alloy, the diffraction peaks of µ phase were observed in addition to the FCC phase, which possesses a structure similar to that of rhombohedral Co 7 Mo 6 phase (JCPDS card 29-0489) [53]. The lattice parameter of the FCC matrix for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy, a, is 3.60465 Å.

X-ray Diffraction
The XRD patterns of the three high-entropy alloys in the as-cast state are shown in Figure 1. It reveals that the three alloys all contain FCC-structured matrix, i.e., (Fe, Ni) phase, according to the JCPDS card 23-0297. For the Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy, it is composed of a single FCC phase (The lattice parameter of the FCC phase, a, is 3.58420 Å). For the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, weak diffraction peaks of a BCC-structured phase could be detected (JCPDS card 34-0396) besides the FCC phase [52]. The lattice parameter of the FCC matrix for the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, a, is 3.60273 Å. For the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy, the diffraction peaks of μ phase were observed in addition to the FCC phase, which possesses a structure similar to that of rhombohedral Co7Mo6 phase (JCPDS card 29-0489) [53]. The lattice parameter of the FCC matrix for the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy, a, is 3.60465 Å. Compared with the diffraction pattern of the Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy, Al or Mo elements cause the diffraction peaks to slightly shift to the left with smaller 2θ values, as shown in Figure 2. According to Bragg lattice equation (Equation (1) [54]), interplanar spacing d increases with decreasing the incident angle θ since the wavelength λ is constant. It indicates that the addition of Al or Mo element causes the FCC-structured lattice to expand.   [30,55].
The lattice parameters can also be calculated by Vegard's law, which is an approximate empirical rule for solid solution lattice parameter calculation, as shown in Equation (2) [56]: where a cal is the calculated lattice parameter; c i is the molar percentage; and a i is the lattice constant of each composition. The molar percentage for each composition can be obtained by EDS results (Tables 2-4 3.66169 Å, and 3.58698 Å, which are slightly different from the measured lattice parameter and with the relative errors of 1.272%, 1.637%, −0.490%, respectively. The relative errors between calculated values and the experimental data are caused by the approximate empirical characteristic of Vegard's law which ignores the change of atomic radius during solid solution formation, the atomic outer electron density, and cohesive energy of the chemical compositions [56,[58][59][60][61][62][63].  The FCC matrix for the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 (3.60273 Å) and Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 (3.60465 Å) alloys both have larger lattice parameter comparing to the Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy (3.58420 Å), as indicated by the above XRD analyses. This lattice expansion phenomenon is caused by the fact that the atomic radii of Al (1.43 Å) and Mo (1.39 Å) are larger than those of other base elements (Fe (1.26 Å), Cr (1.28 Å), Co (1.25 Å), Mn (1.26 Å), and Ni (1.24 Å)) [30,55].
The lattice parameters can also be calculated by Vegard's law, which is an approximate empirical rule for solid solution lattice parameter calculation, as shown in Equation (2) [56]: where is the calculated lattice parameter; is the molar percentage; and is the lattice constant of each composition. The molar percentage for each composition can be obtained by EDS results (Tables 2-4). The lattice constant of each composition ( ) used in this investigation is Fe (3.6468 Å), Cr (3.6526 Å), Co (3.544 Å), Mn (3.8624 Å), Ni (3.5238 Å), Al (4.0495 Å), and Mo (3.147 Å), respectively [57]. The calculated lattice parameters for the FCC matrix of Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20, Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11, and Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 are 3.62980 Å, 3.66169 Å, and 3.58698 Å, which are slightly different from the measured lattice parameter and with the relative errors of 1.272%, 1.637%, −0.490%, respectively. The relative errors between calculated values and the experimental data are caused by the approximate empirical characteristic of Vegard's law which ignores the change of atomic radius during solid solution formation, the atomic outer electron density, and cohesive energy of the chemical compositions [56,[58][59][60][61][62][63].     (Table 3)) in the FCC matrix of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy, which reduces the lattice expansion extent. This phenomenon can be understood via Vegard's law [56]. Assuming the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy contains single FCC solid solution and the molar percentage for each composition is obtained by EDS result from the overall surface of the alloy (see Table 3), the calculated lattice parameter for the assumed FCC solid solution is 3.67231 Å. This value is much larger than the calculated lattice parameter for the actual FCC matrix of Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 (3.66169 Å), suggesting the lattice expansion extent could be reduced by the formation of the BCC phase. Similar trends are reported elsewhere [29,30].

Metallographic Morphology
To understand the phase variations caused by the addition of Al or Mo, metallographic analysis of the three high-entropy alloys was performed, as shown in Figure 3. The metallographic structure of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy is shown in Figure 3a. It has a single phase with a dendritic structure, which is consistent with the XRD analysis. With the addition of the Al, the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy consists of a brighter matrix and darker secondary phases located along grain boundaries ( Figure 3b). These dark secondary phases are associated with the BCC-structured phase, as suggested by the XRD analysis. After the addition of Mo, the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy exhibits distinguished features, as shown in Figure 3c. Long strip and short rod-shaped intermetallic compounds not only distribute along the grain boundaries but also disperse within the crystal grains. These secondary phases should be the intermetallic compounds according to the XRD analysis.

Scanning Electron Microscopy
SEM observation revealed that Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy is a single-phase matrix accompanied by a certain number of spherical structures, as shown in Figure 4. EDS results ( Table 2) indicate that the composition of the FCC-structured matrix (region A) is similar to the overall content of the cast ingot, whereas a higher content of Mn and Ni are detected near the grain boundary (region 3). This is because the melting temperatures of Mn and Ni elements are relatively low, which leads to the segregation during the solidification process [64]. The bright round features (e.g., regions 1 and 2) are cavities which could be formed during the process of alloy preparation. These findings agree well with the research results of Ye et al. [65].
For the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy, brighter secondary phases are visible along grain boundaries, as shown in Figure 5a,b. Among them, long strips and rectangular granular structures are observed, as shown in the positions of points 4 and 5 in Figure 5b, respectively, which contain similar compositions and are all rich in Al and Ni as indicated by the EDS results ( Table 3). The matrix appears dark in contrast (region B), which contains a lower amount of Al and Ni but more Fe as compared to the brighter secondary phases. According to XRD analysis and metallographic observation, the brighter secondary phases are BCC-structured secondary phases while the darker matrix is the FCC-structured phase [66]. The morphology of the BCC-structured secondary phases is also observed by a backscattered electron image as shown in Figure 5c. It exhibits a fine-scale structure containing alternating bright and dark interconnected phases, which has been reported to be formed due to the large negative mixing enthalpy of Al and Ni facilitating the formation of the Al-Ni rich phases during solidification [48,67,68]. Metals 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 25

Scanning Electron Microscopy
SEM observation revealed that Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy is a single-phase matrix accompanied by a certain number of spherical structures, as shown in Figure 4. EDS results ( Table 2) indicate that the composition of the FCC-structured matrix (region A) is similar to the overall content of the cast ingot, whereas a higher content of Mn and Ni are detected near the grain boundary (region 3). This is because the melting temperatures of Mn and Ni elements are relatively low, which leads to the segregation during the solidification process [64]. The bright round features (e.g., regions 1 and 2) are cavities which could be formed during the process of alloy preparation. These findings agree well with the research results of Ye et al. [65].  For the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, brighter secondary phases are visible along grain boundaries, as shown in Figure 5a,b. Among them, long strips and rectangular granular structures are observed, as shown in the positions of points 4 and 5 in Figure 5b, respectively, which contain similar compositions and are all rich in Al and Ni as indicated by the EDS results ( Table 3). The matrix appears dark in contrast (region B), which contains a lower amount of Al and Ni but more Fe as compared to the brighter secondary phases. According to XRD analysis and metallographic observation, the brighter secondary phases are BCC-structured secondary phases while the darker matrix is the  Table 4. It reveals that the FCC-structured matrix (region D) shows similar composition as that of the cast ingot, while the brighter region (region F) adjacent to the grain boundaries contains a higher amount of Mo as compared to the matrix (region D), which should be attributed to the Mo segregation during the solidification process [30]. The secondary phases (regions E and G) within grains and along grain boundaries are found to be enriched in Mo and Cr, while the content of the Mo is approximately 4 times higher than the FCC matrix, which is reported to be typical (Mo, Cr)-rich intermetallic compound (µ) with Mo content greater than Cr [69]. For the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, brighter secondary phases are visible along grain boundaries, as shown in Figure 5a,b. Among them, long strips and rectangular granular structures are observed, as shown in the positions of points 4 and 5 in Figure 5b, respectively, which contain similar compositions and are all rich in Al and Ni as indicated by the EDS results (Table 3). The matrix appears dark in contrast (region B), which contains a lower amount of Al and Ni but more Fe as compared to the brighter secondary phases. According to XRD analysis and metallographic observation, the brighter secondary phases are BCC-structured secondary phases while the darker matrix is the FCC-structured phase [66]. The morphology of the BCC-structured secondary phases is also observed by a backscattered electron image as shown in Figure 5c. It exhibits a finescale structure containing alternating bright and dark interconnected phases, which has been reported to be formed due to the large negative mixing enthalpy of Al and Ni facilitating the formation of the Al-Ni rich phases during solidification [48,67,68]. For the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy with 10 at.% Mo addition, a large number of secondary phases are present predominantly along the grain boundaries and marginally within the grains, as shown in Figure 6. The EDS results of different regions in the alloy are shown in Table 4. It reveals that the FCC-structured matrix (region D) shows similar composition as that of the cast ingot, while the brighter region (region F) adjacent to the grain boundaries contains a higher amount of Mo as compared to the matrix (region D), which should be attributed to the Mo segregation during the solidification process [30]. The secondary phases (regions E and G) within grains and along grain boundaries are found to be enriched in Mo and Cr, while the content of the Mo is approximately 4 times higher than the FCC matrix, which is reported to be typical (Mo, Cr)-rich intermetallic compound (μ) with Mo content greater than Cr [69]. In addition, a trace of white phases with their morphology completely different from that of the intermetallic compound (µ) are occasionally found at the grain boundaries, as shown in Figure 7. EDS results, as listed in Table 5, reveal that these white phases are slightly enriched in Cr and Mo, and the content of Cr is greater than that of Mo. It suggests the white phases are a (Cr, Mo)-rich σ intermetallic compound, which is consistent with previous results [69]. Note that the (Cr, Mo)-rich σ intermetallic compound is not identified from the XRD analysis, because its content is lower than the detection limit of the XRD. It has been reported that the σ phase in high-entropy alloys tends to transform into µ phase to release the larger lattice strain caused by Mo [30,50]. The σ phase could be completely converted to µ phase when the content of Mo is high [6]. Therefore, the trace of σ phase found in the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy should be the residual phases as a result of the phase transformation. composition as that of the cast ingot, while the brighter region (region F) adjacent to the grain boundaries contains a higher amount of Mo as compared to the matrix (region D), which should be attributed to the Mo segregation during the solidification process [30]. The secondary phases (regions E and G) within grains and along grain boundaries are found to be enriched in Mo and Cr, while the content of the Mo is approximately 4 times higher than the FCC matrix, which is reported to be typical (Mo, Cr)-rich intermetallic compound (μ) with Mo content greater than Cr [69].  In addition, a trace of white phases with their morphology completely different from that of the intermetallic compound (μ) are occasionally found at the grain boundaries, as shown in Figure 7. EDS results, as listed in Table 5, reveal that these white phases are slightly enriched in Cr and Mo, and the content of Cr is greater than that of Mo. It suggests the white phases are a (Cr, Mo)-rich σ intermetallic compound, which is consistent with previous results [69]. Note that the (Cr, Mo)-rich σ intermetallic compound is not identified from the XRD analysis, because its content is lower than the detection limit of the XRD. It has been reported that the σ phase in high-entropy alloys tends to transform into μ phase to release the larger lattice strain caused by Mo [30,50]. The σ phase could be completely converted to μ phase when the content of Mo is high [6]. Therefore, the trace of σ phase found in the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy should be the residual phases as a result of the phase transformation.

Vickers Hardness
The Vickers hardness of the three high-entropy alloys is shown in Figure 8. The results reveal that the single-phase Fe 40

Vickers Hardness
The Vickers hardness of the three high-entropy alloys is shown in Figure 8. The results reveal that the single-phase Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy possesses the lowest Vickers hardness of 148.2 ± 5.9 HV. After the addition of Al or Mo, the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 and Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloys exhibit the Vickers hardness of 165.6 ± 24.2 and 208.1 ± 20.5 HV, respectively. It suggests the addition of the Al or Mo may have caused second phase strengthening and solid-solution strengthening, which improves the Vickers hardness of the high-entropy alloys. The increase in the Vickers hardness as a result of Al and Mo addition is, respectively, 17.45 and 59.92 HV, suggesting the strengthening effect is more pronounced when Mo is employed as compared to Al.

Tensile Strength and Plasticity
The stress-strain curves of the three high-entropy alloys are shown in Figure 9. It reveals that the single-phase Fe 40  Note that many researchers focused on the compressive properties of the FeCrCoMnNiMo system high-entropy alloys rather than the tensile properties due to the existing brittle intermetallic compounds [30,50,70,71]. In this investigation, we report the tensile properties as they are of great significance for practical engineering applications.
After the test, the elongation at fracture (A) and reduction of area (Z) were measured by using the fractured samples and summarized in Figure 10a,b. The single-phase FCC-structured Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy shows excellent ductility with the elongation at fracture and reduction of area of 53.4 ± 3.4% (A) and 40.5 ± 0.2% (Z), respectively. For the dual-structured Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy, the elongation at fracture and reduction of area are 42.3 ± 0.4% (A) and 26.4 ± 1.6% (Z), respectively, which is slightly lower than that of the single-phase Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy. With the addition of Mo, the ductility of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy significantly deteriorates. Its elongation at fracture and reduction of area are only 7.0 ± 0.6% (A) and 6.0 ± 0.8% (Z), respectively, which is much lower than the other two high-entropy alloys. In addition, necking was observed during the tensile tests, especially for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy because of its superior ductility (Figure 11c). The necking is less pronounced for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy (Figure 11d). However, the necking phenomenon can hardly be seen for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy due to the deterioration in the ductility (Figure 12d). These findings are consistent with the results of the reduction of area (Z) of the three high-entropy alloys. It is speculated that the formation of a large number of intermetallic compounds should be responsible for premature fracture and deteriorated tensile strength.

Tensile Strength and Plasticity
The stress-strain curves of the three high-entropy alloys are shown in Figure 9. It reveals that the single-phase Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy has a yield strength (σ0.2) of 158 ± 4 MPa and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 420 ± 20 MPa. For the Al-strengthening FCC/BCC dual-structured Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, the σ0.2 and UTS are increased to 218 ± 7 and 507 ± 16 MPa respectively. However, the Mo-containing Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy exhibits a UTS of 346 ± 15 MPa, even though it has a higher σ0.2 of 246 ± 15 MPa. Note that many researchers focused on the compressive properties of the FeCrCoMnNiMo system high-entropy alloys rather than the tensile properties due to the existing brittle intermetallic compounds [30,50,70,71]. In this investigation, we report the tensile properties as they are of great significance for practical engineering applications. After the test, the elongation at fracture (A) and reduction of area (Z) were measured by using the fractured samples and summarized in Figure 10a,b. The single-phase FCCstructured Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy shows excellent ductility with the elongation at fracture and reduction of area of 53.4 ± 3.4% (A) and 40.5 ± 0.2% (Z), respectively. For the dual-structured Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy, the elongation at fracture and reduction of area are 42.3 ± 0.4% (A) and 26.4 ± 1.6% (Z), respectively, which is slightly lower than that of the single-phase Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy. With the addition of Mo, the ductility of the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy significantly deteriorates. Its elongation at fracture and reduction of area are only 7.0 ± 0.6% (A) and 6.0 ± 0.8% (Z), respectively, which is much lower than the other two high-entropy alloys. In addition, necking was observed during the tensile tests, especially for the Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy because of its superior ductility (Figure 11c). The necking is less pronounced for the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy ( Figure 11d). However, the necking phenomenon can hardly be seen for the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy due to the deterioration in the ductility (Figure 12d). These findings are consistent with the results of the reduction of area (Z) of the three highentropy alloys. It is speculated that the formation of a large number of intermetallic compounds should be responsible for premature fracture and deteriorated tensile strength.   (Figure 11a). For the latter, slightly less and shallower ductile dimples and their surrounding tearing edges can be identified even though the fracture mechanism remains the same comparing to the former (Figure 11b). Moreover, a few granular phases in and around the ductile dimples appear on the fracture surface of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloys, which are determined to be Al-rich granular phases (Table 6).   For the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy, its UTS and elongation are significantly degraded, even though the hardness and σ 0.2 are improved by the formation of µ and σ intermetallic compounds resulting from the addition of Mo. Figure 12 shows the fracture surface of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy. A river-like pattern without apparent ductile dimples is observed on the fracture surface, which is a typical feature of brittle fracture, as shown in Figure 12a. Moreover, numerous fine particles distribute on the fracture surface, as shown in the high-magnified image (Figure 12b), which are the intermetallic compounds µ and σ according to the EDS results (Table 7). Further, multiple cracks appear on the fracture surface (Figure 12c).   Figure 11 shows the fracture surfaces of the Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 and Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloys. For the former, a large number of deep ductile dimples accompanied by many tearing edges around the dimples are observed on the fracture surface, which is a typical characteristic of ductile fracture (Figure 11a). For the latter, slightly less and shallower ductile dimples and their surrounding tearing edges can be identified even though the fracture mechanism remains the same comparing to the former (Figure 11b). Moreover, a few granular phases in and around the ductile dimples appear on the fracture surface of the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloys, which are determined to be Al-rich granular phases (Table 6). For the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy, its UTS and elongation are significantly degraded, even though the hardness and σ0.2 are improved by the formation of μ and σ intermetallic compounds resulting from the addition of Mo. Figure 12 shows the fracture surface of the Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloy. A river-like pattern without apparent ductile

Phase Formation, Stability, and Transition
The five-component Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 nonequiatomic high-entropy alloy shows a single-phase FCC structure, which does not conform to the Gibbs phase law under constant pressure [72], i.e., F = C − P + 1, in which F represents the degree of freedom, C represents the number of the component, and P represents the number of phases. This phenomenon is generally reported to be associated with the high-entropy effect [73]. According to Gibbs free energy formula (Equation (3) [15]), the increase of mixing entropy would reduce the Gibbs free energy of mixing, which is beneficial to the formation of a single-phase solid solution. In the formula, ∆G mix is the Gibbs free energy of mixing, ∆H mix is the enthalpy of mixing, and ∆S mix is the entropy of mixing.
The formula of mixing entropy (Equation (4) [74]) reveals that when the multiple principal elements are in equimolar or near-equimolar ratios, the mixing entropy increases with increasing the number of components, which assists the formation of a single-phase structure. In this formula, R is the gas constant, and n is the number of the principal elements.
The above discussion suggests that the high mixing entropy of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy has a positive effect on the formation of a single-phase solid solution, which is well acknowledged by many researchers at present [75]. However, the explanation has its limitations as several researchers pointed out that mixing enthalpy also had an important effect on the phase structure. For instance, Otto et al. and Singh et al. [76,77] both reported that mixing enthalpy showed a similar effect on the formation of solid solution phases for high-entropy alloys as compared with the mixing entropy. Tsai et al. suggested that the competition between entropy and enthalpy determined the phase formation [73].
For the phase stability of FeCrCoMnNi system high-entropy alloys, it is generally accepted that reducing the content of Cr and Mn to a suitable level is beneficial to avoid the formation of σ phase and improve the stability of the FCC phase, whereas properly increasing Co and Ni will not only assist the formation of the FCC phase but also inhibit the appearance of the secondary phases [37][38][39][40]. He et al. studied the Co-Cr-Fe-Ni system high-entropy alloys using the CALPHAD method and experimental verification [37]. They found that the Co-Cr-Fe-Ni single-phase FCC high entropy alloy was stable when the contents of the Co, Fe, and Ni elements ranged from 20% to 40%. However, the molar fraction of Cr should be lower than 25% to maintain the single FCC phase [37]. Bracq et al. investigated the phase stability of the FCC solid solution in the Co-Cr-Fe-Mn-Ni system using the Calphad approach [38]. It was found that the increasing contents of Mn and Cr destabilized the FCC solid solution, which was different from Ni and Co [38]. Recently, Cao et al. reported that the thermodynamic properties of the AlCoCrFeNi x (1.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.8) were improved when the content of Ni was increased [39]. Zhu et al. studied the phase stability of (FeNiCrMn) (100−x) Co x (x = 5, 10 and 20) high-entropy alloys using XRD, SEM and TEM techniques [40]. They found that all the alloys possessed a single FCC phase in the as-cast state, while the FCC phase stability was higher when x = 20 as compared to x = 5 and 10 [40]. Regarding the phase stability in the presence of Fe, Lee et al. reported that the addition of Fe stabilized the FCC phase in the Al 0.5 CoCrFe x NiTi 0.5 high-entropy alloys [78]. Zhang et al. analyzed the phase formation and transition of Fe x CoCrNiMn high-entropy alloys [79]. The single FCC structure was determined with the Fe content of 10-60%, while a BCC structure appeared when the Fe content was greater than 62%. A similar phase transition trend was also reported by Qiu et al., for the Fe-containing high-entropy alloys [80]. The literature review suggests the stability of a single FCC structure could be achieved with a wide range of Fe content, whereas high contents of Co and Ni and low contents of Cr and Mn could be appropriate for the FCC phase stability. Moreover, the effect of Ni and Co on the formation of the FCC phase is similar and Ni has a stronger ability to form the FCC phase as compared to that of Co [41,42]. Hsu et al. constructed approximate phase diagrams for Al-Co-Cr-Fe-Mo-Ni system high-entropy alloys according to the results of SEM, TEM, XRD, and DTA analyses [81]. The phase diagrams demonstrated that the stabilized FCC solid solution can be formed when the content of Co was approaching 30%, while the same effect was found for Ni at a lower content of~20%. The above literature review supports that the design of cost-efficient nonequiatomic FeCrCoMnNi single-phase FCC high-entropy alloy can be achieved by increasing the contents of Fe and Ni and decreasing the contents of Co, Cr, and Mn, which has been experimentally proved in this work.
According to the valence electron concentration (VEC) method proposed by Guo and Liu [82], the phase stabilization in high-entropy alloys could be predicted. The high-entropy alloy favors the formation of FCC-type solid solutions when VEC ≥ 8, while it favors the formation of BCC-type solid solutions when VEC < 6.87 [83]. The VEC for high-entropy alloys can be defined as:  [53]. Thus, the addition of Al causes lattice distortion in the FCC phase as a result of the solid-solution strengthening effect [84]. The diffraction peaks of the FCC phase after adding Al are all shifted slightly to the negative direction with smaller 2θ, suggesting the increased lattice constant after the Al addition, which has been verified by the analysis using the Bragg lattice equation (Equation (1) [54]). The calculated lattice parameter of the FCC matrix for Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 (3.60273 Å) is increased as compared to the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy (3.58420 Å). In addition, the BCC structure is more suitable to accommodate larger solute atoms such as Al, because the BCC structure has a lower atomic packing density (68%) as compared to that of the FCC structure (74%) [29]. Therefore, it is rationalized that the addition of Al promotes the appearance of the BCC phase in the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy.
For the Mo-containing Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy, it consists of an FCC-structured matrix, a large number of µ-(Mo, Cr) phases, and a small number of σ-(Cr, Mo) phases. It is reported that the addition of Mo together with Cr would readily cause the saturation of Mo in the FCC solid solution and lead to the formation of intermetallic compounds, which well explains the phase formation in this work [35,51]. Even though the atomic radius of Mo (1.39 Å) is slightly smaller than Al (1.43 Å), its radius is larger than the other five elements in the system [53]. Thus, the diffraction peaks for the FCC matrix slightly shift to the left as expected, similar to that of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy (Figure 2). The lattice parameter of the FCC matrix for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 (3.60465 Å) alloy is found to be larger than that of Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 (3.60273 Å), suggesting a strong solution strengthening effect by the addition of Mo [30]. In addition, the σ-(Cr, Mo) phase tends to transform into µ-(Mo, Cr) phase to release the larger lattice strain caused by Mo when the content of Mo is high [6,30,50]. Generally, the phase transformation in the FeCrCoMnNiMo system high-entropy alloys is in the sequence of FCC→FCC + σ→FCC + σ + µ [49] when increasing the content of Mo. In this work, the results reveal that the secondary phases are mainly µ-(Mo, Cr) phase accompanied by a small amount of σ-(Cr, Mo) phase, suggesting the occurrence of σ→µ phase transformation.

Vickers Hardness
Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy possesses a single FCC solid solution phase, which can be easily deformed when external stresses are applied [85], leading to lower hardness. After adding Al or Mo, the FCC-structured alloy could be strengthened via solid-solution strengthening, precipitation strengthening, etc. [86][87][88]. For the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy, the FCC/BCC dual-phase structure greatly enhances its hardness due to the strong deformation resistance of the BCC phase [89]. Joseph et al. [46] conducted nanoindentation tests on Al 0.6 CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy and found that the hardness of the BCC phase was about 1.5 times higher than that of the FCC matrix, suggesting that the incorporation of harder BCC phase to the FCC matrix would largely enhance its hardness. Further, the results of XRD reveal that the addition of Al has a solution strengthening effect, leading to additional improvement in the hardness of the alloy. Regarding the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy, the formation of intermetallic compounds µ and σ are prevalent along grain boundaries and in the interior of grains. It has been well studied by Liu et al. [50] that the microhardness of the µ and σ phases is five to six times higher than that of the FCC phase. Consequently, the substantial increase in hardness of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy is mainly related to the precipitation of the harder intermetallic compounds in addition to the solid-solution strengthening [86,90].

Tensile Properties
For the tensile properties, the ductility of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy is outstanding, although the σ 0.2 and UTS were relatively lower as a result of its single-phase FCC structure. The σ 0.2 (158 ± 4 MPa), UTS (420 ± 20 MPa), and elongation at fracture (53.4 ± 3.4%) for the as-cast Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy are comparable and even superior to many of the traditional high-cost equiatomic FeCrCoMnNi high entropy alloys reported in the literature [85,89,[91][92][93]. For the duplex FCC plus BCC structured Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy, the σ 0.2 and UTS were remarkably improved, which is similar to the hardness, resulting from the incorporation of the harder BCC phase into the FCC matrix. Its ductility was only slightly reduced as a result of the presence of the secondary phases. This viewpoint has been confirmed by the Al-rich granular particles and shallower ductile dimples observed on the fractured surface of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy (Figure 11b).
As for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy, the addition of Mo introduces a large number of brittle intermetallic compounds such as µ and σ phases into the FCC matrix. This is detrimental to the ductility of the high-entropy alloy even though its yield strength could be improved because of the strong restriction of the dislocation movement by the existing intermetallic compounds. Qin et al. [70] reported that a large number of secondary phases would be formed in the (CoCrFeMnNi) 100−x Mo x high-entropy alloys when the Mo content was high than 8%. The volume fraction of the secondary phases can be as high as 66% at the Mo content of 16%. The yield strength of the alloy was found to improve due to the solution strengthening effect of the Mo element and the formation of secondary phases [70]. Since the intermetallic secondary phases are brittle in nature, the mechanical strength of the high-entropy alloy could be compromised as a result of the deteriorated ductility by increasing the volume fraction of the secondary phases. Liu et al. suggested that a suitable amount of Mo addition could obtain the best mechanical properties of the FeCoCrNiMo alloy with balanced achievement of strength and ductility [50]. However, a large amount of Mo addition would result in a severe degradation in the mechanical performance due to the overly high-volume fraction and brittle nature of µ precipitates [50]. In this work, the severe cracking observed on the fractured surface is attributed to the high-stress concentration at the interface of the secondary phase/FCC matrix where the dislocation accumulation is high during the tensile testing ( Figure 12) [94,95]. The cracking of the brittle intermetallic compound should not be ignored, which would act as the preferential sites for crack nucleation and lead to premature fracture of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy [51,88,95]. These findings collaboratively support that the premature brittle fracture and deteriorated tensile strength were attributed to the existence of excessive intermetallic compounds and their resultant microcrack nucleation in the alloy. Thus, the addition of Mo should be controlled at a suitable amount by which the tensile strength can be improved through solution strengthening and precipitation strengthening while its ductility can be largely maintained.
It is well acknowledged that the mechanical properties of the high-entropy alloys are highly dependent on their microstructures. The formation of secondary phases in the FCC matrix by the addition of Al and Mo has greatly improved the hardness and yield strength of the prepared alloys. In order to further understand the relationship between the microstructure and mechanical properties, the volume fractions of the secondary phases were evaluated using Photoshop software, as shown in Figures 13 and 14. At least three different SEM images were used to obtain the average value of the volume fraction. The estimated volume fractions of the secondary phases for Fe 40  matrix by the addition of Al and Mo has greatly improved the hardness and yield strength of the prepared alloys. In order to further understand the relationship between the microstructure and mechanical properties, the volume fractions of the secondary phases were evaluated using Photoshop software, as shown in Figures 13 and 14. At least three different SEM images were used to obtain the average value of the volume fraction. The estimated volume fractions of the secondary phases for Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 and Fe40Cr15Co10Mn5Ni20Mo10 alloys are 9.0 ± 1.0% and 15.8 ± 0.9%, respectively.  For the duplex FCC plus BCC structured AlxFeCrCoMnNi high-entropy alloys (Al content is 8-11 at.%), the strength or hardness generally linearly increases with the increase of the volume fraction of BCC [29,44,48,84]. The strength of the alloys can be estimated by the simple rule-of-mixture [29], i.e., σ = σ * (5)), in which V FCC +V BCC =1, σ * FCC and V FCC are the strength and volume fraction of the FCC phase, σ * BCC and V BCC are the strength and volume fraction of the BCC phase, respectively. Note that the BCC phase is much stronger than the FCC phase (i.e., σ * BCC − σ * FCC > 0), suggesting the strength linearly increases with the volume fraction of BCC (V BCC ) as per Equation (5). In this work, the estimated volume fraction of BCC for Fe40Cr15Co10Mn4Ni20Al11 alloy is 9.0 ± 1.0%, while its yield strength and tensile strength are increased from 158 ± 4 MPa and 420 ± 20 MPa to 218 ± 7 MPa and 507 ± 16 MPa, respectively, as compared to the single-phase FCC structure Fe40Cr15Co15Mn10Ni20 alloy. This indicates the formation of the BCC phase by the addition of Al can remarkably strengthen the prepared high-entropy alloys. For the duplex FCC plus BCC structured AlxFeCrCoMnNi high-entropy alloys (Al content is 8-11 at.%), the strength or hardness generally linearly increases with the increase of the volume fraction of BCC [29,44,48,84]. The strength of the alloys can be estimated by the simple rule-of-mixture [29], i.e., σ = * * = * ( * − * ) (Equation (5)), in which + =1, * and are the strength * Qin et al. determined that the simple rule-of-mixture can still be used to describe the strength of the CoCrFeMnNiMox high-entropy alloys (Mo content is 0-16 at.%), i.e., σ = σ * FCC + σ * i − σ * FCC V i (Equation (6)) [70]. In this equation, σ * FCC and σ * i are the strength of the FCC and intermetallic compounds, V i stands for the volume fraction of the intermetallic compounds. Similar to the analysis of the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy, the strength should linearly increase with the volume fraction of the intermetallic compounds as long as the intermetallic compounds are stronger than the FCC phases (i.e., σ * i − σ * FCC > 0). In this investigation, the estimated volume fraction of the intermetallic compounds for the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy is 15.8 ± 0.9%. Its yield strength is 246 ± 15 MPa, which is much higher than the single-phase FCC structure Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 alloy (158 ± 4 MPa) and the FCC + BCC structure Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy (218 ± 7 MPa). However, its tensile strength is only 346 ± 15 MPa, which is lower than both the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 (420 ± 20 MPa) and Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 (507 ± 16 MPa). It suggests that the formation of intermetallic compounds could significantly improve the yield strength, which is consistent with Equation (6). However, the tensile strength cannot be evaluated by Equation (6), which might be attributed to the fact that the intermetallic compounds are too brittle to be deformed under tensile loading.
It is generally acknowledged that the single-phase FCC-structured high-entropy alloys exhibit excellent ductility with low strength whereas single-phase BCC-structured high-entropy alloys show high strength with low ductility [96,97]. The combination of ductile FCC-matrix and a suitable amount of strong BCC phases would be a good strategy to design high-entropy alloys with high strength and good ductility [98]. Many researchers are designing and fabricating high-entropy alloys consisting of a principal FCC phase with strong secondary phases, such as BCC-phases, nano precipitates, etc., which could remarkably increase the mechanical strength and maintain a good ductility [67,99]. The results of this work support that incorporating a small amount of strong BCC-structured secondary phases into the ductile FCC matrix could achieve the optimized strength/hardness and ductility, such as the Al-reinforced Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy. However, a large number of strong secondary phases, especially those brittle intermetallic compounds, such as the µ and σ intermetallic compounds in the Mo-containing Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy as reported herein, are detrimental to the improvement of the mechanical properties. The findings of this investigation are not only beneficial to the research of traditional high-entropy alloys but also critical to the follow-up studies of the newly designed nonequiatomic high-entropy alloys.

Conclusions
In this work, a Fe-rich nonequiatomic Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 high-entropy alloy was successfully prepared, and the influence of Al or Mo addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties was investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn.
(1) Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 high-entropy alloy was a single-phase face-centered cubic (FCC) structure, whereas the Al-containing Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy was a duplex FCC plus BCC structure owing to the lattice distortion as a result of the incorporation of Al. With the addition of Mo, a large number of (Mo, Cr)-rich µ phases and few (Cr, Mo)-rich σ phases were introduced to the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy.
(2) The Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 15 Mn 10 Ni 20 nonequiatomic high-entropy alloy exhibited moderate strength and excellent ductility owing to its single-phase FCC structure. After the addition of Al, the formation of less deformable BCC phases in the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 4 Ni 20 Al 11 alloy remarkably increased its hardness, yield strength (σ 0.2 ), and UTS, without compromising its ductility significantly. For the Fe 40 Cr 15 Co 10 Mn 5 Ni 20 Mo 10 alloy, the existence of a large number of intermetallic compounds (mainly µ phase and a small amount of σ phase) significantly deteriorated its UTS and ductility, even though the hardness and σ 0.2 could be improved. Therefore, it is crucial to control the quantity of the brittle intermetallic compounds to develop high-entropy alloys with high strength/hardness and good ductility.