Effect of Melt Overheating on Structure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Mg-Si Cast Alloy

: The paper discusses the complex effect of melt overheating with subsequent fast cooling down to the pouring temperature on the crystallization process, microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Mg-Si aluminum alloy. The results obtained facilitated the establishment of rational modes of melt overheating, leading to a signiﬁcant change in the dispersion and morphology of structural components. In particular, with an increase in the melt overheating temperature to 900 ◦ C with holding and subsequent rapid cooling to the casting temperature, a decrease in the average size of dendritic cells of the aluminum solid solution from 39 µ m to 13 µ m was observed. We also noticed the reﬁnement of eutectic inclusions of the Mg 2 Si phase with compact morphology. An increased level of mechanical properties was noted; the maximum values of tensile strength and elongation reached 228 MPa and 5.24%, respectively, which exceeded the initial values by 22.5% and 52.3%, correspondingly. The microhardness of the aluminum solid solution sequentially increased from 38.21 to 56.5 HV with an increase in the temperature during melt overheating. According to the EDS linear scanning, an increase in the superheat temperature of the melt is accompanied by an increase in the degree of saturation of the solid solution with magnesium.


Introduction
It is well known that the quality of cast products made of aluminum alloys is largely determined by their structure.In particular, the mechanical and operational properties of aluminum alloys significantly depend on such structural factors like morphology, size, and distribution of structural components, including grains of an aluminum α-solid solution and various primary crystallizing phases [1][2][3].In this regard, the formation of a finegrained structure in castings is one of the ways to increase their properties and improve the quality of products from aluminum alloys [4][5][6].The problem of creating resource-efficient technologies for modifying casting alloys is exacerbated by the fact that the growing requirements for castings in terms of physical, mechanical, and operational properties have to be met under conditions of a continuous increase in the amount of using secondary charge materials [7].These trends in the use of scrap and waste as a charge materials not only reduce the cost of cast materials, but also contribute to reduce the extraction of virgin ores on a global scale, preserving reserves of natural raw materials [8].
Advances in the development of the theory of the structure of metal melts contributed to the development of new promising methods for processing melts, which make it possible to achieve a modified structure without introducing expensive (and not always effective and convenient in use) additive elements [9].These methods include various physical effects on metal melts during melting and crystallization, such as overheating (so called thermal-temporal and thermal-rate treatment) [10][11][12], electrical and electromagnetic treatment [13,14], ultrasonic treatment [15,16], vibration treatment [17] and many others.In industrial conditions, from the point of view of technological implementation, the most convenient treatment is the processing of melts during melting [18].
Numerous studies confirm the relationship between melt structure and modified alloy structures in the solid state.At present, it is generally accepted that atomic clusters are retained in the structure of metal melts under certain conditions [19,20].Recently, there have been many theoretical concepts and hypotheses about the structural components in melts, all of them have one or another argument in their favor; however, there is still no unified and universal concept of the structure of metallic melts [21].The same applies to the influence of the high-temperature state of the melt on the structure of alloys in the as-cast state.It is assumed that overheating of melts to high temperatures increases the degree of their homogeneity due to the intensification of the thermal motion of atoms, which leads to a decrease or destruction of atomic clusters [22,23].
Thus, the search for rational parameters for the processing of melts by overheating is closely related to the issues of the influence of melt homogeneity on solidification microstructure and properties.Investigations in this direction have been actively carried out since the 1970s.Recent studies have shown that the destruction of microinhomogeneities during overheating of metal melts leads to an increase in supercooling before the start of nucleation [24].In particular, in [25], direct experimental confirmation of the effect of the melt superheating on the nucleation undercooling was given, and it was shown that an increase in the overheating temperature of melts of the Al-Si system significantly reduces the size of primary crystals.It was shown that an increase in undercooling could lead to the activation of small inclusions, which under normal conditions do not participate in nucleation processes, as well as to homogeneous nucleation throughout the entire volume of the undercooled liquid.
The high-temperature type of short-range order (SRO) structure of the melt can be fixed by rapid cooling of the melt before pouring [26], since the rate of structural transformations in the liquid phase is rather low, despite the relatively high rates of diffusion processes.Due to the low rate of structural changes in the liquid phase, rapid cooling of the melt can largely suppress the transformation of clusters and other various atomic groups [27,28].Due to this, by the use of overheat treatment with fast melt cooling, it is possible to fix to a certain extent the high-temperature type of structure of the liquid phase at the time of pouring the melt into the mold.Thus, obtaining a fine-grained structure of a cast alloy by high-temperature overheating followed by fast melt cooling is an important promising reserve for increasing the level of mechanical and operational properties of castings from various alloys.
In recent years, the method of melt overheating has been most successfully tested on aluminum alloys of various systems.Confirmed effects of such processing include, for example, the columnar to equiaxed transition in Al-Cu and Al-Cu-Si alloys [29], a significant refinement of grains of the primary solid solution in hypoeutectic Al-Si alloys [30] and primary silicon crystals in hypereutectic Al-Si alloys [31].A transition from dendritic grains to globular grains was also noted during thermal-rate processing of the aluminum alloy Al-9Si-0.5Mg[32].It was observed that superheat treatment helped to reduce the harmful effects of iron impurities in Al-Si alloys due to its transfer to a more favorable morphology [27].Certain successes were achieved in the modification of magnesium-based alloys by melt overheating [33].However, the literature contains very limited information on the use of melt overheating technique on alloys of the Al-Mg and Al-Mg-Si systems.At the same time, casting alloys based on the Al-Mg-Si system, belonging to the AA 5xx.x series (Aluminum Association, Arlington, VA, USA), have significant potential for application in the automotive, shipbuilding and aerospace industries, therefore, the search for effective ways to obtain a modified structure in them is an industrially significant task [34].At present, alloys of this system are mainly modified with expensive additives of transition metals such as Zr, Hf, Nb, Sc, etc. [35].Nonetheless, these methods do not always lead to the desired result and entail technological difficulties associated with the need for accurate metering of the amount of modifier when introduced into the melt.It also produces undesirable accumulation of modifiers in the alloys in the form of impurities in the event of the involvement of scrap and waste of these alloys as the secondary materials with multiple reuse.
Thus, the aim of this work is to study the effect of different levels of the melt overheating with subsequent fast cooling down to the pouring temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cast aluminum alloys based on the Al-Mg-Si system (for example, of the industrial aluminum casting alloy of the AA 511 grade).

Materials and Methods
Pure components were used as initial materials for the preparation of experimental alloys: aluminum (≥99.99%Al), magnesium (≥99.9%Mg), silicon (≥99.0%Si).The chemical composition of the alloys was determined using ARL ADVANT'X X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).The standard chemical composition of the alloy and the actual averaged composition of the samples obtained at different temperatures of melt overheating are presented in Table 1.Melting was carried out in a shaft electric resistance furnace with a crucible capacity of 20 kg for aluminum.Before melting, all charge materials were thoroughly cleaned and heated to a temperature of 150 • C.After melting the aluminum, gaseous technical argon (99.98% Ar) was fed into the furnace at the mirror of the melt, and the supply was continued until the end of melting.At a temperature of 720-740 • C, silicon was added to the melt according to the calculation of the charge.After complete dissolution of silicon, magnesium wrapped in aluminum foil was added at 720-740 • C and thoroughly mixed with a graphite rod.The melt was kept for 10 min at a given superheat temperature (750, 800, 850 and 900 • C).Upon completion of the exposure, rapid cooling to the pouring temperature was carried out by adding unheated aluminum ingots into the melt.In all series of experiments, samples were obtained at the same pouring temperature of 720 • C and mold preheating temperature of 200 • C. The cooling rate to the casting temperature was 70-90 • C/min.Immediately after reaching the required temperature, the melt was poured into a cylindrical steel mold with an inner diameter of 30 mm and a height of 100 mm.Samples were cut from the obtained ingots to study the microstructure and distribution of alloying elements.Samples for mechanical tests were machined from ingots cast into a steel mold with a diameter of 35 mm and a height of 220 mm.The study of the microstructure of the samples was carried out on a digital metallographic microscope MICRO 200 (Optoelectronic Systems OJSC, Minsk, Belarus) on thin sections in the as-cast condition.To ensure comparability, all samples obtained at different temperatures of melt overheating were cut at the same distance of 15 mm from the bottom of the ingot and prepared in accordance with standard metallographic sample preparation procedures.The IM4000 Ion Milling System (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to prepare the sections.Metallographic images were taken at the same distance from the edge of the sample, which was the same for all studied samples.Average sizes of dendritic cells were quantified using the Abrams circular intercept technique according to ASTM E112.For measurements, ImageJ v.1.53software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used.To quantify the average sizes of dendritic cells, at least five analysis zones were selected for each sample.
The study of microhardness was carried out on samples prepared for metallographic observations.A Shimadzu HMV-G device (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to measure the microhardness.Microhardness indices were calculated according to the standard procedure.The nominal value of the test force was 9.807 mN (HV0.001),exposure 15 s, a Vickers-type diamond pyramid was used as an indenter, and measurements were made in accordance with ISO 6507-1: 2018.Each reported microhardness value is the arithmetic mean of at least ten measurements taken.
The tensile strength was determined at a speed of 3 mm/min on samples with a working section length of 150 mm and a diameter of 15 mm using a Shimadzu AG-X Plius machine (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).The measured values in each case are obtained as average over the test results of five specimens that do not have any obvious casting defects on the fracture surface.
X-ray spectral microanalysis to determine the content of elements in various structural components of alloy was carried out on an SU-70 apparatus (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with attachments for energy-dispersive analysis (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ultra Dry), wave elemental micro-X-ray spectral analysis (Thermo Fisher Scientific MagnaRay) and microphase analysis by reflected diffraction electrons (Thermo Scientific QuasOR).The microheterogeneity of the distribution of elements in the metal base in selected areas of the sample in reflected electrons in phases along the selected profiles was estimated.
Thermodynamic calculations of the equilibrium phase diagram of Al-Mg-Si and prediction of the evolution of the fraction of solid phases during crystallization were performed in the Thermo-Calc software package (version 3.1, TTAL5 Al-based alloy thermodynamic database, Thermo-Calc Software AB, Stockholm, Sweden) using the CALPHAD approach.Due to the fact that only pure components were used in the preparation of experimental alloys, the calculations did not consider the possible effect of low concentrations of impurity elements in the alloy.

Results and Discussion
As is known, AA 511 alloy is a low-concentrated alloy based on the Al-Mg-Si ternary system; therefore, the thermodynamic parameters of the components and formed phases in the equilibrium state are widely available and presented in the corresponding databases.Figure 1 shows the isothermal section of Al-Mg-Si phase diagram at 25 • C in the Al-rich corner and polythermal section at 0.5 wt.% Si and up to 5.0 wt.% Mg.The dashed line Figure 1a indicates the standardized composition range of magnesium and silicon in AA 511 alloy.According to the thermodynamic calculations, in the cast state, the structure of the alloy in the considered range of concentrations of alloying elements after complete solidification should be represented by the phases Al 3 Mg 2 + FCC + Mg 2 Si.perature of 588.3 °С.The second intermetallic phase Al3Mg2 precipitated at a temperature of 450 °C.It is obvious that the solidification of an alloy of this composition should end in the three-phase region (Al) + Mg2Si + Al3Mg2.Thus, during the thermal-rate processing of AA 511 alloy melts, an important task is to search for modes that provide a modifying effect on both the dendritic cells of the α-solid solution and the excess phases of crystallization origin.Representative metallographic images of the AA 511 alloy structure under various modes of melt heat treatment are shown in Figure 3. Metallographic studies of alloy samples in the as-cast state, obtained at different temperatures of melt overheating, confirmed the modifying effect on the dispersion and morphology of structural components in the Al-Mg-Si system.In particular, judging by the obtained micrographs, an increase in the overheating temperature of the melt was accompanied by the refining of dendrites of the aluminum solid solution and eutectic inclusions of the Mg 2 Si phase.Additionally, a change in the morphology of the Mg 2 Si from skeleton-like to a more compact one was also observed.Obviously, the best structural and morphological parameters of the processed alloys in the performed series of experiments were achieved at overheating temperature 900 • C. Representative metallographic images of the AA 511 alloy structure under various modes of melt heat treatment are shown in Figure 3. Metallographic studies of alloy samples in the as-cast state, obtained at different temperatures of melt overheating, confirmed the modifying effect on the dispersion and morphology of structural components in the Al-Mg-Si system.In particular, judging by the obtained micrographs, an increase in the overheating temperature of the melt was accompanied by the refining of dendrites of the aluminum solid solution and eutectic inclusions of the Mg2Si phase.Additionally, a change in the morphology of the Mg2Si from skeleton-like to a more compact one was also observed.Obviously, the best structural and morphological parameters of the processed alloys in the performed series of experiments were achieved at overheating temperature 900 °C.In the structure of the alloy obtained without melt overheating, the average size of dendritic cells was 39.12 µm.An increase in the overheating temperature during the melt processing to 800, 850 and 900 • C was accompanied by a sequential decrease in the average size of dendritic cells to 22.06 µm, 17.65 µm and 13.01 µm, respectively.
For all melt treatment options, EDS line scans were used to study the distribution of alloying elements and impurities over the sample cross-section.Figure 4 shows the distribution of Al, Mg, Si and Fe in the cast samples of the AA 511 alloy at different temperatures of melt overheating in comparison with the corresponding SEM images for which they were obtained.
The analysis of the SEM microstructures in reflected electrons showed that the alloy of AA 511 grade in the cast state consisted of an α-solid solution of magnesium in aluminum and a pseudo-eutectic, in which Si and impurity elements (in particular, Fe) were dissolved.According to the results of the analysis of the elements in the structural components of AA 511 alloy, depending on the overheating temperature, it was shown that with an increase in the overheating temperature during isothermal holding of the melt, the solubility of Mg in the α-solid solution over the cross section of the sample increases.In particular, in the initial sample, the averaged magnesium content in the α-solid solution was 2.76 ± 0.16 wt.%.An increase in the overheating temperature to 800, 850, and 900 • C was accompanied by a sequential increase in the magnesium content in the α-solid solution to 3.25 ± 0.18 wt.%, 3.76 ± 0.16 wt.%, and 4.21 ± 0.19 wt.%, respectively.In this case, the overheating temperature during isothermal holding in the studied temperature range has practically no effect on the solubility of silicon in a solid solution.The average values of solubility were obtained for at least ten points of analysis.In the structure of the alloy obtained without melt overheating, the average size of dendritic cells was 39.12 μm.An increase in the overheating temperature during the melt processing to 800, 850 and 900 °C was accompanied by a sequential decrease in the average size of dendritic cells to 22.06 μm, 17.65 μm and 13.01 μm, respectively.
For all melt treatment options, EDS line scans were used to study the distribution of alloying elements and impurities over the sample cross-section.Figure 4 shows the distribution of Al, Mg, Si and Fe in the cast samples of the AA 511 alloy at different temperatures of melt overheating in comparison with the corresponding SEM images for which they were obtained.Figure 5 shows the averaged measured values of the microhardness of the structural components of the alloy samples obtained at different temperatures of melt overheating.It can be seen from the obtained measurements that the microhardness of the aluminum solid solution sequentially increased with an increase in the overheating temperature and demonstrated the highest value upon overheating to 900 • C (56.50 ± 4.46 HV), while the microhardness of intergranular intermetallics remained practically at the same level upon overheating to 750, 800 and 850 • C, slightly increasing with overheating to 900 • C (90.94 ± 4.77 HV).The observed increase in the microhardness of the solid solution can be associated with an increased saturation of aluminum with alloying elements, primarily magnesium.At the same time, the melt overheating had no significant effect on the microhardness of the resulting intergranular intermetallics.demonstrated the highest value upon overheating to 900 °C (56.50 ± 4.46 HV), while the microhardness of intergranular intermetallics remained practically at the same level upon overheating to 750, 800 and 850 °C, slightly increasing with overheating to 900 °C (90.94 ± 4.77 HV).The observed increase in the microhardness of the solid solution can be associated with an increased saturation of aluminum with alloying elements, primarily magnesium.At the same time, the melt overheating had no significant effect on the microhardness of the resulting intergranular intermetallics.Figure 6 shows the mechanical properties (tensile strength and elongation) of the AA 511 alloy at different overheating temperatures.The results demonstrated that when the melt overheated to 800 °C, an increase in tensile strength was recorded on average from 186 to 200 MPa with a slight increase in plasticity (from 3.44% to 3.76%).An increase in the overheating temperature to 850 °C had practically no effect on the change in strength compared to overheating to 800 °C; however, it significantly increased the ductility of the Figure 6 shows the mechanical properties (tensile strength and elongation) of the AA 511 alloy at different overheating temperatures.The results demonstrated that when the melt overheated to 800 • C, an increase in tensile strength was recorded on average from 186 to 200 MPa with a slight increase in plasticity (from 3.44% to 3.76%).An increase in the overheating temperature to 850 • C had practically no effect on the change in strength compared to overheating to 800 • C; however, it significantly increased the ductility of the alloy (up to 4.27%, which is 24% higher than in the initial state).The subsequent increase in the temperature of overheating of the melt to 900 • C lead to a significant increase in tensile strength (up to 228 MPa, which is 22.5% higher than the strength of the original alloy) and ductility of the alloy, the latter increasing by 52.3% in comparison with the untreated alloy.An increase in the mechanical properties of the alloy after the melt overheating with fast cooling down to the pouring temperature can be a consequence of the refining and compacting of particles of eutectic precipitates.The morphology of these inclusions will have a strong influence on the mechanical properties as well as the reduction in the average size of the dendritic cells.Thus, the melt overheating treatment can be considered as an effective way to increase the strength and plastic properties of alloys of the Al-Mg-Si system.
The mechanism of the influence of the processing of melts by overheating on the structure of the cast alloy is still controversial and is closely related to the concepts of the structure of metal melts.The effect of the melt overheating with subsequent fast cooling down to the pouring temperature on the structure and mechanical properties of alloys, apparently, can be defined by the fact that a fine-grained structure is formed due to a change in the degree of undercooling of a more homogeneous melt, which determines the character of crystallization of the melt.These assumptions are based on the concept of the initial structural and phase inhomogeneity of aluminum alloys of the Al-Mg-Si system, which are due to the coexistence of an α-solid solution and intermetallic phases Mg 2 Si and Al 3 Mg 2 , as well as phases formed due to the presence of impurity elements.In a melt of this composition, microgroups of atoms can exist that retain the elements of the shortrange order structure, and are the carriers of the characteristics of the above-mentioned excess phases.Numerous studies on temperature dependences of density, viscosity, surface tension, resistivity and other structure-sensitive properties of metal melts indicated the occurrence of some structural rearrangements when overheated above the liquidus temper-ature to certain critical values [36][37][38].After reaching the critical temperature, the values of which will depend on the chemical composition of the alloy, irreversible destruction of atomic segregations can occur and the melt approaches a microhomogeneous equilibrium state.Homogenization of the melt at a high superheat temperature is accompanied by dissolution of clusters, leading to higher undercooling [39].Thus, an increase in the degree of microhomogeneity of the melt changes the thermodynamic conditions of crystallization, resulting in the production of an alloy with a more ordered phase and structural composition.In addition, an increase in undercooling leads to the formation of a supersaturated solid solution in terms of the content of alloying elements.With an increase in the overheating temperature, thermally-induced diffusion processes intensify contributing to a more uniform distribution of alloying elements [40] and thereby affecting undercooling.
Metals 2021, 11, 1353 10 of 14 alloy (up to 4.27%, which is 24% higher than in the initial state).The subsequent increase in the temperature of overheating of the melt to 900 °C lead to a significant increase in tensile strength (up to 228 MPa, which is 22.5% higher than the strength of the original alloy) and ductility of the alloy, the latter increasing by 52.3% in comparison with the untreated alloy.An increase in the mechanical properties of the alloy after the melt overheating with fast cooling down to the pouring temperature can be a consequence of the refining and compacting of particles of eutectic precipitates.The morphology of these inclusions will have a strong influence on the mechanical properties as well as the reduction in the average size of the dendritic cells.Thus, the melt overheating treatment can be considered as an effective way to increase the strength and plastic properties of alloys of the Al-Mg-Si system.The mechanism of the influence of the processing of melts by overheating on the structure of the cast alloy is still controversial and is closely related to the concepts of the structure of metal melts.The effect of the melt overheating with subsequent fast cooling down to the pouring temperature on the structure and mechanical properties of alloys, apparently, can be defined by the fact that a fine-grained structure is formed due to a change in the degree of undercooling of a more homogeneous melt, which determines the character of crystallization of the melt.These assumptions are based on the concept of the initial structural and phase inhomogeneity of aluminum alloys of the Al-Mg-Si system, which are due to the coexistence of an α-solid solution and intermetallic phases Mg2Si and Al3Mg2, as well as phases formed due to the presence of impurity elements.In a melt of this composition, microgroups of atoms can exist that retain the elements of the shortrange order structure, and are the carriers of the characteristics of the above-mentioned excess phases.Numerous studies on temperature dependences of density, viscosity, surface tension, resistivity and other structure-sensitive properties of metal melts indicated the occurrence of some structural rearrangements when overheated above the liquidus temperature to certain critical values [36][37][38].After reaching the critical temperature, the values of which will depend on the chemical composition of the alloy, irreversible destruction of atomic segregations can occur and the melt approaches a microhomogeneous equilibrium state.Homogenization of the melt at a high superheat temperature is accompanied by dissolution of clusters, leading to higher undercooling [39].Thus, an increase in the degree of microhomogeneity of the melt changes the thermodynamic conditions of crystallization, resulting in the production of an alloy with a more ordered phase and In addition to the described effects associated with high-temperature overheating and isothermal holding of the melt, in practice, the implementation of such treatment leads to an increase in the cooling rate of the melts.This is due to the following effects: additives of a certain amount of unheated solid materials having the same composition as the alloy introduced into the superheated melt and being melted, acting as melting microcoolers, and by creating a modifying effect for the structure, introducing a large number of potential crystallization centers [41].In the ideal case, when using the technology of thermal-rate processing to fix the effect of overheating, it is advisable to use additives of fine-grained materials, for example, waste and return of die casting of an alloy of the appropriate composition, or a specially prepared charge blank.In this case, smallscale microheterogeneities contribute to the intensification of the process of obtaining fine-grained structural components of the alloy.
In addition, high-temperature overheating and isothermal holding can lead to the activation of various insoluble particles (for example, oxide inclusions of Al 2 O 3 and MgO, spinels, etc.), which are always present in aluminum melts in certain quantities and are not wetted by melts under normal melting and casting conditions.In particular, overheating increases the wettability of alumina particles [42], which allows them to act as a substrate for the nucleation of crystals of α-solid solution.An increase in the wettability of oxide inclusions can also be caused by polymorphic transformations of aluminum oxide.At temperatures above 800 • C, aluminum oxide undergoes polymorphic transformations from γ-Al 2 O 3 to δ-Al 2 O 3 [43].Thus, aluminum oxide, together with other insoluble particles, can be involved in the crystallization process, although under normal conditions of melting and casting, it does not participate directly in it.The stated assumptions lead to the conclusion about the possibility of a complex effect of overheating on the state of metal melts.
Thus, overheating treatment with rapid melt cooling is one of the most simple and effective ways to obtain a fine-grained cast structure of alloys with a more uniform distribution of alloying elements, which has a positive effect on the micro-and macrostructure of castings and, as a consequence, on the resulting level of mechanical properties.Despite some limitations associated with an increase in energy consumption, an increase in the duration of the technological cycle and a reduction in the service life of the crucible, the effectiveness of the modifying effect on the structure of alloys during overheat treatment in many cases is not lower than when using traditional grain refiners of chemical action, which is confirmed by the results of early studies, for example [32].In addition, the modifying effect of the overheat treatment is especially relevant for improving the quality of alloys when using their return, scrap and waste, and secondary charge materials.However, despite numerous scientific results, many questions remain regarding the mechanisms of the effect of high-temperature overheating on the structure and properties of aluminum casting alloys.Therefore, it is necessary to continue comprehensive research in this direction, including those promoting the development of a general theory of modification of alloys and its relationship with the representations about the structure of metal melts.

Conclusions
Experimental studies have made it possible to establish the effect of different levels of melt overheating with subsequent fast cooling down to the pouring temperature on the formation of a cast microstructure and mechanical properties of AA 511 aluminum alloy, which belongs to the Al-Mg-Si system.Metallographic studies of alloy specimens in the cast state, obtained at different temperatures of the melt overheating, have confirmed the strong modifying effect on the dispersion and morphology of structural components.In particular, an increase in the temperature of the melt overheating to 900 • C was accompanied by refining of dendrite cells of an aluminum α-solid solution on average to ~13 µm (more than three times in comparison with the initial state).It was also followed with a decrease in the size of eutectic inclusions of the Mg 2 Si phase and a change in their morphology to more compact.Analysis of the distribution of elements according to EDS line scans showed an increase in the degree of saturation of the aluminum matrix with magnesium with an increase in the overheating temperature.The application of the melt overheating technique and fast melt cooling contributed to a significant increase in the mechanical properties of AA 511 alloy.In particular, the maximum values of tensile strength and elongation reached 228 MPa and 5.24%, respectively, when the melt was overheated to 900 • C.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Calculated isothermal section of Al-Mg-Si phase diagram at 25 °С in the Al-rich corner (a) and polythermal section at 0.5 wt.% Si and up to 5.0 wt.% Mg (b).Figure 1. Calculated isothermal section of Al-Mg-Si phase diagram at 25 • C in the Al-rich corner (a) and polythermal section at 0.5 wt.% Si and up to 5.0 wt.% Mg (b).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Calculated isothermal section of Al-Mg-Si phase diagram at 25 °С in the Al-rich corner (a) and polythermal section at 0.5 wt.% Si and up to 5.0 wt.% Mg (b).Figure 1. Calculated isothermal section of Al-Mg-Si phase diagram at 25 • C in the Al-rich corner (a) and polythermal section at 0.5 wt.% Si and up to 5.0 wt.% Mg (b).To assess the change in the mass fraction of solid phases during the crystallization of the AA 511 alloy, calculations were performed based on the Scheil-Gulliver solidification model implemented in the Thermo-Calc program.The content of the main alloying elements in the alloy was taken according to the average value of the regulated concentration range.According to the solidification curve Figure 2, crystallization of an alloy containing 4.0 wt.% Mg and 0.5 wt.% Si begins at 638.1 • C with the formation of dendrites of the α-solid solution.The beginning of the formation of the Mg 2 Si phase corresponded to a temperature of 588.3 • C. The second intermetallic phase Al 3 Mg 2 precipitated at a temperature of 450 • C. It is obvious that the solidification of an alloy of this composition should end in the three-phase region (Al) + Mg 2 Si + Al 3 Mg 2 .Thus, during the thermal-rate processing of AA 511 alloy melts, an important task is to search for modes that provide a modifying effect on both the dendritic cells of the α-solid solution and the excess phases of crystallization origin.Representative metallographic images of the AA 511 alloy structure under various modes of melt heat treatment are shown in Figure3.Metallographic studies of alloy samples in the as-cast state, obtained at different temperatures of melt overheating, confirmed the modifying effect on the dispersion and morphology of structural components in the Al-Mg-Si system.In particular, judging by the obtained micrographs, an increase in the overheating temperature of the melt was accompanied by the refining of dendrites of the aluminum solid solution and eutectic inclusions of the Mg 2 Si phase.Additionally, a change in the morphology of the Mg 2 Si from skeleton-like to a more compact one was also observed.Obviously, the best structural and morphological parameters of the processed alloys in the performed series of experiments were achieved at overheating temperature 900 • C.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SEM images and corresponding EDS line scans of AA511 aluminum alloy showing element distributions at different levels of the melt overheating: 750 (a), 800 (b), 850 (c) and 900 °С (d).The line with an arrow in the SEM images shows the scanning direction.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SEM images and corresponding EDS line scans of AA511 aluminum alloy showing element distributions at different levels of the melt overheating: 750 (a), 800 (b), 850 (c) and 900 • C (d).The line with an arrow in the SEM images shows the scanning direction.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Microhardness of structural components of AA 511 aluminum alloy in as-cast state at different temperatures of the melt overheating.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Microhardness of structural components of AA 511 aluminum alloy in as-cast state at different temperatures of the melt overheating.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Tensile strength (MPa) and elongation (%) of the AA 511 alloy in the as-cast state at different temperatures of melt overheating.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Tensile strength (MPa) and elongation (%) of the AA 511 alloy in the as-cast state at different temperatures of melt overheating.

Table 1 .
The standard and averaged actual chemical compositions of 511.0 alloy samples obtained at different levels of melt overheating (Aluminum Association, USA).