Relationship and Mechanism Analysis of Soft-Melt Dropping Properties and Primary-Slag Formation Behaviors of the Mixed Burden in Increasing Lump Ore Ratio

: At present, cost reduction and environmental protection are the mainstream of blast furnace (BF) development and the high lump ore ratio is an e ﬀ ective means. Therefore, it is signiﬁcant to explore the relationship and mechanism of burden soft-melt dropping and its primary-slag formation behaviors under increasing lump ore ratio. In this paper, the melt–drop test is carried out on the single ore and mixed burden, and obtained primary-slag properties are subjected to analysis. The experimental results show that the primary-slag of lump ore contains a large amount of FeO and SiO 2 , so it simply produces many low melting point compounds, which cause terrible soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors. Notably, mixing with sinter and pellet can e ﬀ ectively improve both the properties. With the increase in lump ore ratio, the CaO in the primary-slag decreases, FeO and SiO 2 increase, resulting in the melting temperature of the primary-slag sequentially decreasing and the cohesive zone moves to the low temperature zone. In addition, the maximum pressure di ﬀ erence increases, and the gas permeability deteriorates. Increasing the sinter ratio can overcome the defect of high lump ore ratio that can e ﬀ ectively improve the poor softening performance, melting performance and the position and thickness of the cohesive zone. However, because of the pulverization performance, the maximum pressure di ﬀ erence and gas permeability of the burden become worse.


Introduction
At present, blast furnace (BF) is a high-efficiency mainstream ironmaking process that cannot be replaced and the problems it faces mainly include cost and environmental protection. The reasonable burden structure and BF slag system optimization play significant roles in stabling BF operation, reducing the production cost and improving the level of productivity [1][2][3][4]. However, increasing the ratio of lump ore into the BF can effectively reduce costs and pollution [5][6][7][8]. However, during the conversion of ferric oxide to trioxide, the unit cell will expand by 21%, resulting in pulverization, which will affect the permeability by increasing the lump ore ratio. What is more, the reduction in high sinter ore ratio will certainly affect the soft-melt dropping behaviors.
The ratio of lump ore used by companies in Japan and other Asian countries generally exceeds 15% and some even exceed 20%, which fully demonstrates that the ratio of high-quality lump ore into the furnace between 10% and 20% will not have a large impact on the operation of the BF. It further proves the feasibility of the high-ratio lump ore into the furnace [5][6][7][8]. In Baosteel and Shougang, the ratio of lump ore directly entering the BF can reach 20%. However, some other domestic BFs find it difficult to reach 15% and some even produce full clinker smelting [9][10][11]. This is due to the lack of high-grade lump ore in our country. In recent years, the quality and grade of imported ore have also decreased, which leads to the reduction in the smelting economy of lump ore resources.
The ratio of lump ore has an important influence on the metallurgical properties of the burden and BF operation. In recent years, there are a large number of researchers exploring the function mechanisms of lump ore on softening-melting behaviors of mixed burden. Wu et al. considered that different types of lump ore have different effects on the soft-melt dropping properties and high-quality lump ore has a small impact on the soft-melt dropping properties of the mixed burden. Simultaneously its high temperature metallurgy can meet the requirements of the BF [12,13]. Zhang et al. found that, compared with a single burden, the reduction properties and low-temperature reduction pulverization properties of the mixed burden are superimposed, but the soft-melt dropping properties are not superimposed. In addition, a proper amount of high-quality lump ore ratio will not have a large impact on the ironmaking process [14][15][16]. Naito et al. revealed that raw materials smelting has a terrible impact on the BF operation, but the metallurgical properties can meet the requirements of BF smelting [17]. Besides, some researchers deem that the temperature range of the single ore primary-slag is wide and the interaction between mixed burden can improve the primary-slag formation behaviors. In addition, others explored the influence of different chemical components on the metallurgical properties of slag [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, predecessors have not conducted a comprehensive study on the relationship between softening-melting and primary-slag formation behaviors on the cohesive zone under high lump ratio.
It is of great significance to explore the high-temperature metallurgical properties under high ratio lump ore ratio. This work systematically analyzes the soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors of the charge under the condition of increasing the lump ore ratio and further analyzes their internal relations and the mechanism. It mainly uses large-scale soft-melt dropping equipment to select lump ore ratios of 15%, 20% and 25%, respectively. Then the obtained primary slags are subjected to chemical composition, slag phase composition and melting properties. Finally, the soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors are explored, as well as their internal connections. This will provide a theoretical basis for exploring the influence of the ratio of lump ore on the whole BF ironmaking process.

Materials
The iron ores in the experiment are used in actual BF production, including sinter (S-1) with basicity of 1.80, pellet (P-1) and lump ore (O-1). The specific chemical compositions of the samples are shown in Table 1. The Fe T mass fraction of S-1 is 58.51% and SiO 2 mass fraction is only 4.84%, which is a typical sinter with high iron, low silicon and high basicity. In addition, for P-1 with the contents of Fe T , SiO 2 mass fraction sets as 66.54% and 2.03%, respectively. What is more, the Fe T mass fraction of O-1 is 63.38% and the content of SiO 2 is 3.14%, which has high quality and can satisfy the normal smelting requirements.

Experimental Procedure
The test uses a large-capacity iron ore soft-melt dropping detection device with independent intellectual property rights, which is shown in Figure 1. At present, the method for measuring iron ore high temperature load reduction soft-melt dropping properties (GB/T 34211-2017) only regulates the relevant operations and parameters of the experimental process of small drip equipment (500 g); this article, however, refers to large drip equipment (2000 g). The experimental dosage is more, the experimental results are more representative, and the reproducibility is better [26]. The test conditions are determined as follows: The specification of graphite crucible is ϕ95 mm × 210 mm and loads 1 kg/cm 2 of iron-bearing burden. In addition, 80 g of coke is laid under the burden layer, 60 g of coke is laid above and the full particle size is 8-12 mm. The heating system and ventilation system of the equipment are shown in Figure 2.

Experimental Procedure
The test uses a large-capacity iron ore soft-melt dropping detection device with independent intellectual property rights, which is shown in Figure 1. At present, the method for measuring iron ore high temperature load reduction soft-melt dropping properties (GB/T 34211-2017) only regulates the relevant operations and parameters of the experimental process of small drip equipment (500 g); this article, however, refers to large drip equipment (2000 g). The experimental dosage is more, the experimental results are more representative, and the reproducibility is better [26]. The test conditions are determined as follows: The specification of graphite crucible is φ95 mm × 210 mm and loads 1 kg/cm 2 of iron-bearing burden. In addition, 80 g of coke is laid under the burden layer, 60 g of coke is laid above and the full particle size is 8-12 mm. The heating system and ventilation system of the equipment are shown in Figure 2.

Melting and Dropping Test Schemes
According to the actual production of BF burden alkalinity (w(CaO)/w(SiO2) is generally 1.3-1.5 [27,28], the melt-drop experiment scheme selected in this work is shown in Table 2. Schemes 1-3 are three kinds of single ore. Schemes 4-6 are the mixed burdens with the sinter ratio unchanged, the

Experimental Procedure
The test uses a large-capacity iron ore soft-melt dropping detection device with independent intellectual property rights, which is shown in Figure 1. At present, the method for measuring iron ore high temperature load reduction soft-melt dropping properties (GB/T 34211-2017) only regulates the relevant operations and parameters of the experimental process of small drip equipment (500 g); this article, however, refers to large drip equipment (2000 g). The experimental dosage is more, the experimental results are more representative, and the reproducibility is better [26]. The test conditions are determined as follows: The specification of graphite crucible is φ95 mm × 210 mm and loads 1 kg/cm 2 of iron-bearing burden. In addition, 80 g of coke is laid under the burden layer, 60 g of coke is laid above and the full particle size is 8-12 mm. The heating system and ventilation system of the equipment are shown in Figure 2.

Melting and Dropping Test Schemes
According to the actual production of BF burden alkalinity (w(CaO)/w(SiO2) is generally 1.3-1.5 [27,28], the melt-drop experiment scheme selected in this work is shown in Table 2. Schemes 1-3 are three kinds of single ore. Schemes 4-6 are the mixed burdens with the sinter ratio unchanged, the

Melting and Dropping Test Schemes
According to the actual production of BF burden alkalinity (w(CaO)/w(SiO 2 ) is generally 1.3-1.5 [27,28], the melt-drop experiment scheme selected in this work is shown in Table 2. Schemes 1-3 are three kinds of single ore. Schemes 4-6 are the mixed burdens with the sinter ratio unchanged, the pellet ratio decreased, and the lump ore ratio increased. Schemes 7 and 8 keep the lump ore ratio constant at 25% and change other burdens' ratios. Shrinkage occurs in the softening process of the burden and the shrinkage rate of the burden can be calculated by Equation (1).
where ∆H is the shrinkage rate of the burden at a certain temperature, %; H T is the displacement of the displacement sensor at a certain temperature, mm; H 0 is the original height of the burden, mm.
The changes in the softening properties of the burden under different burden are shown in Figure 3.
Comparing the shrinkage curves a, b and c in Figure 3a, it can be seen that for the single ore, the T 0 (temperature at which the burden begins to shrink) and T 10 (the temperature at which the burden shrinks 10% of the lump O-1) and T 40 (the temperature at which the burden shrinks by 40%) are the smallest, and ∆T (the softening temperature range of the burden, ∆T = T 40 − T 10 ) is the widest at 169 • C. In comparison, T 0 and T 10 of sinter are the largest, T 40 is similar to pellet at 1300 • C and ∆T is the narrowest at only 94 • C. Pellet has the highest T 40 at 1302 • C and T 0 , T 10 and ∆T are between the other two types of single ore. In summary, the softening properties of sinter is the best, pellet is second and lump ore is the worst. This is because lump ore is mainly composed of limonite with loose structure and higher crystal water content. At the same time, it contains higher Al 2 O 3 , which causes it to soften at a lower temperature [24]. High-basicity sinter and self-dissolving pellet have excellent metallurgical properties, strong resistance to deformation and relatively high softening temperature [27].
Comparing the shrinkage curves d, e and f in Figure 3b, when the S-1 ratio is constant: the O-1 ratio increases from 15% to 20%; T 0 increases by 9 • C; T 10 decreases from 1172 • C to 1161 • C; T 40 increases from 1290 • C to 1315 • C; ∆T increases by 36 • C. When the O-1 ratio increases from 20% to 25%: T 0 rises to 1099 • C; T 10 , T 40 , ∆T all decrease, but the change value is small. In summary, as the ratio of lump ore increases, the T 0 increases and T 10 decreases in turn. Under the influence of lump ore, the softening properties first deteriorate sharply and as the ratio of lump ore further increases, its influence gradually weakens. The first reason is that as the high softening temperature pellet ratio decreases and the low softening temperature lump ore ratio increases; the second is that the SiO 2 content of the lump ore is higher. The increasing ratio makes it easier to react with FeO at lower temperatures and generate a large amount of low melting point compounds, resulting in a decrease in the T 10 of the mixed burden [22,28].  Comparing the shrinkage curves g, h and i in Figure 3c, it can be seen that when the O-1 ratio is 25%: the S-1 ratio increases from 55% to 65%; T0 changes little; T10 increases by 11 °C; T40 of both is 1305 °C; ΔT is narrowed by 11 °C. When the S-1 ratio increased from 65% to 75%: T0 rises to 1099 °C; T0 drops 7 °C; T10 only increased 3 °C; T40 decreases 14 °C; ΔT reduces from 136 °C to 119 °C. In summary, as the sinter ratio increases successively, the T0 of the mixed burden decreases, but the amplitude is not large; T10 increases; T40, ΔT decreases. Properly increasing the sintering ratio can effectively improve the softening properties of the high lump ore ratio burden. The reason may be that as the high softening temperature sinter increases, the lower softening temperature pellet ratio decreases. The second is that the sinter phase is mainly calcium ferrite, which has better reduction properties. With the increase in its ratio, the FeO content is reduced. At the same time, the sinter contains higher MgO and CaO that can form a large number of high melting point compounds, which leads to the increase in the T10 of the mixed burden [20][21][22]28].
In summary, due to its own defects, lump ore has a lower softening temperature, a wide softening range and poor softening performance. However, the performance can be effectively improved by mixing ores, because the interaction between the burden has a positive effect on the softening performance [12,13]. As the lump ore ratio increases, the T10 gradually decreases due to the Comparing the shrinkage curves g, h and i in Figure 3c, it can be seen that when the O-1 ratio is 25%: the S-1 ratio increases from 55% to 65%; T 0 changes little; T 10 increases by 11 • C; T 40 of both is 1305 • C; ∆T is narrowed by 11 • C. When the S-1 ratio increased from 65% to 75%: T 0 rises to 1099 • C; T 0 drops 7 • C; T 10 only increased 3 • C; T 40 decreases 14 • C; ∆T reduces from 136 • C to 119 • C. In summary, as the sinter ratio increases successively, the T 0 of the mixed burden decreases, but the amplitude is not large; T 10 increases; T 40 , ∆T decreases. Properly increasing the sintering ratio can effectively improve the softening properties of the high lump ore ratio burden. The reason may be that as the high softening temperature sinter increases, the lower softening temperature pellet ratio decreases. The second is that the sinter phase is mainly calcium ferrite, which has better reduction properties. With the increase in its ratio, the FeO content is reduced. At the same time, the sinter contains higher MgO and CaO that can form a large number of high melting point compounds, which leads to the increase in the T 10 of the mixed burden [20][21][22]28].
In summary, due to its own defects, lump ore has a lower softening temperature, a wide softening range and poor softening performance. However, the performance can be effectively improved by mixing ores, because the interaction between the burden has a positive effect on the softening performance [12,13]. As the lump ore ratio increases, the T 10 gradually decreases due to the increase in low melting point compounds. Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, increasing the high alkalinity sinter ratio can effectively suppress the disadvantages of lump ore.

Analysis of the Melting Behaviors
The changes in melting properties of the three single ore are shown in Figure 4a. O-1 has the lowest T s (pressure difference steep rise temperature) and T d (temperature at which the slag and iron drips), which are 1247 • C and 1358 • C, respectively. Additionally, ∆Tds (burden melting temperature range, The maximum T s of P-1 is 1321 • C, ∆T ds is only 69 • C and T d is between the other two. The T d of S-1 is as high as 1439 • C, ∆T ds is the largest and T s is second only to pellet. Lump ore containing low melting point compounds has a lower melting temperature [11,16]. Thus, the charge melts at a lower temperature and blocks the gap of the material layer, causing the pressure difference to rise sharply at a lower temperature. At the same time, the high melting point compounds contained in it make its dropping temperature higher, so its melting range is wider. However, sinter and pellet containing a large amount of high melting point have a higher melting temperature and narrow melting range.
Metals 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 14 increase in low melting point compounds. Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, increasing the high alkalinity sinter ratio can effectively suppress the disadvantages of lump ore.

Analysis of the Melting Behaviors
The changes in melting properties of the three single ore are shown in Figure 4a. O-1 has the lowest Ts (pressure difference steep rise temperature) and Td (temperature at which the slag and iron drips), which are 1247 °C and 1358 °C, respectively. Additionally, ΔTds (burden melting temperature range, ΔTds = Td − Ts) is 111 °C. The maximum Ts of P-1 is 1321 °C, ΔTds is only 69 °C and Td is between the other two. The Td of S-1 is as high as 1439 °C, ΔTds is the largest and Ts is second only to pellet. Lump ore containing low melting point compounds has a lower melting temperature [11,16]. Thus, the charge melts at a lower temperature and blocks the gap of the material layer, causing the pressure difference to rise sharply at a lower temperature. At the same time, the high melting point compounds contained in it make its dropping temperature higher, so its melting range is wider. However, sinter and pellet containing a large amount of high melting point have a higher melting temperature and narrow melting range.   The lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 25% and the melting characteristics of the mixed burdens are shown in Figure 4b. When the O-1 ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the Ts of the mixed burden decreases by 33 °C, the Td decreases from 1430 °C to 1418 °C, the ΔTds increases by 21 °C. Meanwhile, the O-1 ratio increased from 20% to 25%, Ts dropped to 1285 °C, Td dropped by 16 °C, ΔTds dropped from 117 °C to 106 °C. As the proportion increases, due to the increase in low melting point compounds, the melting start temperature decreases and the temperature at which molten iron appears is lower, which in turn leads to lower dropping temperature.
The sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the melting characteristics of the mixed burden are shown in Figure 4c. When the S-1 ratio increases from 55% to 65%, the Ts of the mixed burden rises from 1285 °C to 1302 °C, Td increases by 12 °C, ΔTds decreases by 5 °C and the melting properties improve. When the S-1 ratio increased from 65% to 75%, Ts increased by 13 °C, Td rose to 1417 °C, The lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 25% and the melting characteristics of the mixed burdens are shown in Figure 4b. When the O-1 ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the T s of the mixed burden decreases by 33 • C, the T d decreases from 1430 • C to 1418 • C, the ∆T ds increases by 21 • C. Meanwhile, the O-1 ratio increased from 20% to 25%, T s dropped to 1285 • C, T d dropped by 16 • C, ∆T ds dropped from 117 • C to 106 • C. As the proportion increases, due to the increase in low melting point compounds, the melting start temperature decreases and the temperature at which molten iron appears is lower, which in turn leads to lower dropping temperature.
The sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the melting characteristics of the mixed burden are shown in Figure 4c. When the S-1 ratio increases from 55% to 65%, the T s of the mixed burden rises from 1285 • C to 1302 • C, T d increases by 12 • C, ∆T ds decreases by 5 • C and the melting properties improve. When the S-1 ratio increased from 65% to 75%, T s increased by 13 • C, T d rose to 1417 • C, ∆T ds only increased by 1 • C. With the increase in sinter with greater high melting point compounds, the melting temperature and dropping temperature of the mixed charge likewise increased.
In summary, the lump ore phase is complex, and the melting points of the compounds contained are quite different, so it has a lower T s and a wider ∆T ds . Further, mixed charge can also effectively improve its performance. When the O-1 ratio increases, the ∆T ds moves to the low temperature area and the melting temperature interval becomes wider. This may be due to the decrease in P-1 with better melting properties and the formation of a large amount of low melting compounds. Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, appropriately increasing the sinter ratio can improve the melting properties of the mixed burden to a certain extent. This may be because the increase in S-1 has better melting properties. At the same time, the sinter contains higher MgO and CaO, forming a large amount of high melting point compounds, which leads to the increasing T d of the mixed burden [27].

Analysis of the Maximum Pressure Difference
The change of ∆P max (maximum pressure difference) of different burdens is shown in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5a, the ∆P max of lump ore is as high as 12.93 kPa, followed by sinter and pellet, which are the smallest at only 3.02 kPa. The thermal explosion performance of lump ore and the low-temperature reduction and pulverization performance of sinter are poor, resulting in more powder produced during the high-temperature reduction process, which seriously affects the air permeability of the ore layer. Meanwhile, the self-dissolving pellet has better metallurgical properties and strong toughness. ΔTds only increased by 1 °C. With the increase in sinter with greater high melting point compounds, the melting temperature and dropping temperature of the mixed charge likewise increased. In summary, the lump ore phase is complex, and the melting points of the compounds contained are quite different, so it has a lower Ts and a wider ΔTds. Further, mixed charge can also effectively improve its performance. When the O-1 ratio increases, the ΔTds moves to the low temperature area and the melting temperature interval becomes wider. This may be due to the decrease in P-1 with better melting properties and the formation of a large amount of low melting compounds. Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, appropriately increasing the sinter ratio can improve the melting properties of the mixed burden to a certain extent. This may be because the increase in S-1 has better melting properties. At the same time, the sinter contains higher MgO and CaO, forming a large amount of high melting point compounds, which leads to the increasing Td of the mixed burden [27].

Analysis of the Maximum Pressure Difference
The change of ΔPmax (maximum pressure difference) of different burdens is shown in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5a, the ΔPmax of lump ore is as high as 12.93 kPa, followed by sinter and pellet, which are the smallest at only 3.02 kPa. The thermal explosion performance of lump ore and the lowtemperature reduction and pulverization performance of sinter are poor, resulting in more powder produced during the high-temperature reduction process, which seriously affects the air permeability of the ore layer. Meanwhile, the self-dissolving pellet has better metallurgical properties and strong toughness.  As shown in Figure 5b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the ΔPmax of the mixed burden only increases by 0.69 kPa; while the lump ore ratio rises to 25%, the ΔPmax of the mixed burden further increases by 1.93 kPa. As the lump ore ratio increases, the powder produced by thermal explosion increases, which blocks the gaps in the material layer and increases the maximum pressure difference.
The control of the lump ore ratio at 25%, the sinter ratio increasing from 55% to 75% and the change of the mixed burden ΔPmax is shown in Figure 5c. When the sinter ratio increased from 55% As shown in Figure 5b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the ∆P max of the mixed burden only increases by 0.69 kPa; while the lump ore ratio rises to 25%, the ∆P max of the mixed burden further increases by 1.93 kPa. As the lump ore ratio increases, the powder produced by thermal explosion increases, which blocks the gaps in the material layer and increases the maximum pressure difference. The control of the lump ore ratio at 25%, the sinter ratio increasing from 55% to 75% and the change of the mixed burden ∆P max is shown in Figure 5c. When the sinter ratio increased from 55% to 65%, ∆P max increased from 7.04 kPa to 9.45 kPa. However, as the sinter ratio continues to increase to 75%, the change range of ∆P max becomes smaller-only 0.61 kPa. As the ratio of sinter increases, the powder produced by low-temperature reduction and pulverization increases, which blocks the gaps in the material layer and increases the maximum pressure difference.
To sum up, due to its poor thermal explosion performance, lump ore produces more powder in the high-temperature reduction, resulting in a larger maximum pressure difference. However, the mixture can effectively reduce the maximum pressure difference. As the lump ore ratio increases, more powder is produced by high-temperature reduction and the maximum pressure difference increases sequentially. As the sinter ratio increases, the powder produced by low-temperature reduction powder further increases and the maximum pressure difference further increases.

Analysis of the Comprehensive Air Permeability
The comprehensive air permeability of the cohesive zone can be expressed by its index (S) and its calculation formula is as shown in Equation (2): where ∆P T is the pressure difference at temperature T and ∆P s is the pressure difference at temperature T s . The change of the comprehensive air permeability index of different burdens is shown in Figure 6. The S value of the three kinds of single ore is shown in Figure 6a. The maximum S value of lump ore is 680 kPa· • C; the air permeability is the worst. The S value of pellet is only 221 kPa· • C; the air permeability is the best, and sinter is located between pellet and lump ore. Lump ore has a large ∆P max , while its melting temperature is low and the interval is wide, so its S value is large. Although the ∆P max of sinter is second only to lump ore, it has a higher T s , T d and a narrow ∆T ds , so its S value is smaller than that of lump ore. However, the ∆P max of pellet is smaller, the melting performance is higher, and the gas permeability is the best.
As shown in Figure 6b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the S value changes little, which has little effect on its air permeability. When the lump ore ratio increases from 20% to 25%, the S value increases from 273 kPa· • C to 434 kPa· • C and the air permeability becomes worse. According to the above, as the lump ore ratio increases, the maximum pressure difference increases successively, the melting performance successively deteriorates, and the S value successively increases.
The lump ore ratio is controlled to be 25%, the sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the change of the S value of the mixed burden is shown in Figure 6c. When the sinter ratio increased from 55% to 65%, the S value increased by 93 kPa· • C. As the ratio increases to 75%, the S value continues to increase to 613 kPa· • C. According to the above, as the sinter ratio increases, although the melting performance becomes better, the change range is smaller than the pressure difference and the air permeability worsens.
In summary, because lump ore has a larger pressure difference, a lower melting temperature and a wider melting range, its air permeability is poor. Being mixed with sinter and pellet can effectively improve its air permeability. With the increase in lump ore ratio, the pressure difference gradually increases, the melting temperature decreases, the interval becomes wider and the air permeability becomes worse. When the sinter ratio increases, its influence on the maximum pressure difference is greater than that on the melting performance, so the gas permeability worsens.
6. The S value of the three kinds of single ore is shown in Figure 6a. The maximum S value of lump ore is 680 kPa °C; the air permeability is the worst. The S value of pellet is only 221 kPa °C; the air permeability is the best, and sinter is located between pellet and lump ore. Lump ore has a large ΔPmax, while its melting temperature is low and the interval is wide, so its S value is large. Although the ΔPmax of sinter is second only to lump ore, it has a higher Ts, Td and a narrow ΔTds, so its S value is smaller than that of lump ore. However, the ΔPmax of pellet is smaller, the melting performance is higher, and the gas permeability is the best.

Analysis of the Cohesive Zone Position
The position change of the cohesive zone in different burdens is shown in Figure 7. The position of the cohesive zone of the three single ore is shown in Figure 7a. The cohesive zone of the lump ore is the thickest, up to 260 • C. Further, it is in a very low temperature zone, so its air permeability of the burden is very poor. In comparison, the cohesive zone of sinter ranges from 1206 • C to 1439 • C and the temperature zone of the cohesive zone is the highest with a thickness of 233 • C. The cohesive zone of pellet is the thinnest, with a temperature range of 1179 • C−1390 • C and the melting temperature range that has the greatest influence on gas permeability is the smallest and has the best gas permeability. Based on the above, it can be seen that the lump ore contains more complex compounds, has a lower T 10 and a higher T d , so the thickness of the cohesive zone is wider.
As shown in Figure 7b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the thickness of the cohesive zone changes very little. However, the range of melting temperature increases, the air permeability worsens and the cohesive zone moves to the low temperature area. When the lump ore ratio increased from 20% to 25%, although the thickness of the cohesive zone decreased by 24 • C, it moved further to the low temperature zone. As the lump ore ratio increases, due to the increase in low melting point compounds, the T 10 is lower. Additionally, the sinter and pellet play leading roles in the T d , so the variation range of T d is less than the T 10 and the cohesive zone becomes thicker.
is the thickest, up to 260 °C. Further, it is in a very low temperature zone, so its air permeability of the burden is very poor. In comparison, the cohesive zone of sinter ranges from 1206 ℃ to 1439 ℃ and the temperature zone of the cohesive zone is the highest with a thickness of 233 ℃. The cohesive zone of pellet is the thinnest, with a temperature range of 1179 ℃−1390 ℃ and the melting temperature range that has the greatest influence on gas permeability is the smallest and has the best gas permeability. Based on the above, it can be seen that the lump ore contains more complex compounds, has a lower T10 and a higher Td, so the thickness of the cohesive zone is wider.  The control of the lump ore ratio is 25%, the sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the change in the mixed burden cohesive zone temperature range is shown in Figure 7c. When the sinter ratio increases from 55% to 65%, the thickness of the cohesive zone changes very little and the melting temperature range only narrows by 5 • C, and the whole cohesive zone moves to the high temperature zone by 8 • C. While the sinter ratio increases to 75%, although the cohesive zone thickens by 11 • C, its melting temperature range only increases by 1 • C, T d increases by 14 • C and the cohesive zone moves to the high temperature zone. Increasing the sinter ratio, the softening performance and melting performance improve, so the performance of the cohesive zone likewise improves.
In summary, the lump ore has a lower soft-melt temperature and a thicker cohesive zone. Mixed charge can effectively improve the performance of lump ore cohesive zone. As the lump ore ratio increases, the performance of the cohesive zone worsens, and increasing the sinter ratio has a certain positive effect on the formation of the cohesive zone.

Analysis of Primary-Slag Formation Behavior of Iron-Bearing Burden after Increasing Lump Ore Ratio
In order to further explore the change and mechanism of the soft-melt dropping properties of the mixed burden with increasing lump ore ratio, the maximum pressure difference and the temperature at the maximum pressure difference are determined according to the above-mentioned test. Then the test is stopped at this temperature and the graphite crucible is dissected to extract the primary slag. The dissecting result is shown in Figure 8. We used Rigaku D/MAX-2500 X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) to analyze its mineral composition; the results are shown in Figure 9. The XRF-1800 X-ray fluorescence analysis equipment is used for chemical composition analysis. The results of the chemical composition of the primary slag formed by six groups of burden are shown in Table 3. At the same time, the melting point was detected by the HRHN-5F melting point equipment. The melting process is shown in Figure 10. Among them, deformation temperature is the temperature at which the tip end of the cone is rounded or the cone begins to tilt; the softening start temperature is when the tip of the cone becomes curved; hemispherical temperature is the time when the cone turns into a hemisphere; when the cone reaches the flow temperature, it is completely flat on the cone holder with no obvious shape. The results of the melting properties are shown in Table 4. primary slag. The dissecting result is shown in Figure 8. We used Rigaku D/MAX-2500 X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) to analyze its mineral composition; the results are shown in Figure 9. The XRF-1800 X-ray fluorescence analysis equipment is used for chemical composition analysis. The results of the chemical composition of the primary slag formed by six groups of burden are shown in Table 3. At the same time, the melting point was detected by the HRHN-5F melting point equipment. The melting process is shown in Figure 10. Among them, deformation temperature is the temperature at which the tip end of the cone is rounded or the cone begins to tilt; the softening start temperature is when the tip of the cone becomes curved; hemispherical temperature is the time when the cone turns into a hemisphere; when the cone reaches the flow temperature, it is completely flat on the cone holder with no obvious shape. The results of the melting properties are shown in Table 4.             temperature, thicker cohesive zone, larger maximum pressure difference, poor air permeability and poor melting performance of the primary slag. On the other hand, by being mixed with sinter and pellet, all the properties can be effectively improved.

2.
With the increase in lump ore ratio, the CaO in the primary slag decreases, and FeO and SiO 2 increase, resulting in the decrease in high melting point compounds in the primary slag. The melting temperature of the primary slag sequentially decreases, resulting in the softening temperature and melting temperature being reduced. The cohesive zone moves to the low temperature zone. Meanwhile, the maximum pressure difference increases, and the gas permeability deteriorates.

3.
Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, increasing the sinter ratio can raise the high melting point compounds produced during the high temperature reduction process, so it can effectively improve the poor softening performance, melting performance and the position and thickness of the cohesive zone. However, due to its own metallurgical properties that easily produce a large amount of powder, which leads to the deterioration of the maximum pressure difference and gas permeability of the burden.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.