High Temperature and Corrosion Properties of A Newly Developed Fe-Al-O Based OPH Alloy

Fe–Al–O-based materials are currently undergoing a great deal of development because of their many special properties. However, lack of strength at high temperatures, limited ductility at ambient temperatures and corrosion resistance have hindered a wider application of these materials. Recently, a new Fe–Al-based oxide precipitation hardened (OPH) steel was developed by the authors to improve the mechanical properties and oxidation resistance. The new OPH alloys are produced by dissolving a specific amount of oxygen in the matrix during mechanical alloying followed by precipitation of fine dispersion of aluminum or yttrium oxides during hot consolidation. A series of tests was performed to evaluate the thermomechanical properties and corrosion resistance in a 3.5% NaCl solution. The results show improved corrosion resistance, as well as mechanical properties, while the production costs of this material are lower than for traditional materials.


Introduction
In a future environmental, ecofriendly energy industry, it will be necessary to develop new structural materials with excellent properties, including corrosion resistance and relevant high temperature strength [1][2][3]. Two classical groups of these metallic materials are nickel-based superalloys and oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) ferritic steels. The single-crystal superalloys are significant because of excellent creep properties due to their microstructure, which consists of ordered cube-shaped γ'-precipitates, separated by thin channels of the disordered γ matrix. The instability of the γ´-precipitates due to directional coalescence and/or coarsening above 900 • C and enormous costs seem to be the biggest disadvantages of single-crystal super alloys. On the other hand, ODS alloys consist of a matrix strengthened by a rather fine dispersion of stable oxides (usually Y 2 O 3 ) with a typical size of 5-30 nm and with a volume fraction of about 0.5%. They are made from nanocomposite powder produced by mechanical alloying (MA) of the matrix and yttrium powders, which is then hot consolidated [4][5][6][7][8][9]. ODS steels have been developed as one of the best compatible materials for high temperature applications, especially in fusion power plants. Compared with conventional ferritic/martensitic steels, ODS steels have better mechanical properties (tensile and creep strength) and oxidation resistance, thanks to the high number density of nanosized oxide particles with good thermal stability [9][10][11][12]. Such processing could be improved using a controlled thermomechanical treatment, combined with lowering the content of elements such as O, N and C introduced during

Material Preparation
The new Fe-Al-based OPH steel is prepared from metal powders by means of powder metallurgy [22] (Figure 1). In the first step, powders of Fe, Al and other components (Table 1) are mechanically alloyed in a vacuum in a low energy ball mill developed by the authors. The mill is capable of sealing, evacuation or filling by a gas. The mill contains two separate steel containers (each 24 l), which are filled with 200 (100 in each) steel balls with a diameter of 40 mm. The mill allows adjustment of the rotation frequency between 20 min -1 to 90 min -1 . In the present study, a constant frequency of 75 min -1 with milling time of 250 h is used. The mechanical alloying (MA) increases the density of defects in the matrix of the powder and oxygen dissolves in the matrix drastically by being trapped in the defects. The solubility of interstitial oxygen in the heavily deformed matrix seems to be enormous [23]. In the second step, the MA powder is transferred to a low-alloy steel rolling container with a diameter of 20 mm with no contact to the air, evacuated and sealed by welding. Then a hot rolling mill is used to process the prepared materials with three steps of hot rolling. In the first step the container is heated to a temperature of 900 • C and rolled to a thickness of 7.5 mm, and the procedure is repeated for rolling to a thickness of 5 mm and 3.2 mm in the next two steps. All the steps have a rolling speed of 0.2 m/s. An approximately 2.5 mm thick OPH sheet covered on both sides by 0.3 mm thick scale from the rolling container is produced in this way. After the hot rolling the material is separated from the container and annealed at 1200 °C for 20 h, the samples for testing are cut using a water jet and ground. In this study six variants of OPH differing in vol. % of Al (6% to 0.5%) are chosen as shown in Table 1.

Specimen Preparation
In order to optimize the sample preparation process and investigate the corrosion properties of OPH steels, square samples (2 cm × 2 cm) are prepared to fit in the advanced corrosion cell. Moreover, standard micro-tensile samples are cut to cover the mechanical and microstructural tests for all variants of the OPH alloy. A waterjet cutting system is used to cut all the forms of the samples. The samples are cut in a longitudinal direction (parallel to the rolling direction), and the thickness of the specimens is approximately 2 mm after grinding.

Testing Equipment and Procedure
A servo-hydraulic MTS thermomechanical simulator (MTS, Minnesota, USA) and a UHL/VMHT hardness tester (Walter Uhl, Asslar, Germany) are used to carry out the mechanical tests. The purpose-built convertors (UWB, Pilsen, Czech Republic) were manufactured by the authors to hold the samples on the servo-hydraulic MTS. All of the tensile tests are carried out at room temperature (RT) with a constant strain rate of 0.001 s −1 to simulate the static conditions. The hardness tests are performed with a load of 10 kg and loading time of 11 s on the head of the surface of the polished samples. The average value is calculated from three measurements. The hardness is measured on the head of the samples for the tensile test as well as near the fracture, to see if there is a significant difference between the initial state and the deformed state of the materials. However, the values are the same with a tolerance of 0.5%. A scanning electron microscope (SEM), Tescan LYRA 3 (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic), is used for the metallographic analysis of the samples. All the cross sections are prepared using standard grinding and polishing processes. The last polishing step is performed with oxide polishing suspension (OPS). To observe the very fine microstructure, a very high magnification of 50 k× is used.
In order to perform the corrosion resistance evaluation of each oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) sample, square samples with 2 mm thickness are cut, electrically connected with a wire, mounted in epoxy resin, and then mechanically polished with 1200 grit SiC paper. Afterwards, they After the hot rolling the material is separated from the container and annealed at 1200 • C for 20 h, the samples for testing are cut using a water jet and ground. In this study six variants of OPH differing in vol. % of Al (6% to 0.5%) are chosen as shown in Table 1.

Specimen Preparation
In order to optimize the sample preparation process and investigate the corrosion properties of OPH steels, square samples (2 cm × 2 cm) are prepared to fit in the advanced corrosion cell. Moreover, standard micro-tensile samples are cut to cover the mechanical and microstructural tests for all variants of the OPH alloy. A waterjet cutting system is used to cut all the forms of the samples. The samples are cut in a longitudinal direction (parallel to the rolling direction), and the thickness of the specimens is approximately 2 mm after grinding.

Testing Equipment and Procedure
A servo-hydraulic MTS thermomechanical simulator (MTS, Minnesota, USA) and a UHL/VMHT hardness tester (Walter Uhl, Asslar, Germany) are used to carry out the mechanical tests. The purpose-built convertors (UWB, Pilsen, Czech Republic) were manufactured by the authors to hold the samples on the servo-hydraulic MTS. All of the tensile tests are carried out at room temperature (RT) with a constant strain rate of 0.001 s −1 to simulate the static conditions. The hardness tests are performed with a load of 10 kg and loading time of 11 s on the head of the surface of the polished samples. The average value is calculated from three measurements. The hardness is measured on the head of the samples for the tensile test as well as near the fracture, to see if there is a significant difference between the initial state and the deformed state of the materials. However, the values are the same with a tolerance of 0.5%. A scanning electron microscope (SEM), Tescan LYRA 3 (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic), is used for the metallographic analysis of the samples. All the cross sections are prepared using standard grinding and polishing processes. The last polishing step is performed with oxide polishing suspension (OPS). To observe the very fine microstructure, a very high magnification of 50 k× is used.
In order to perform the corrosion resistance evaluation of each oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) sample, square samples with 2 mm thickness are cut, electrically connected with a wire, mounted in epoxy resin, and then mechanically polished with 1200 grit SiC paper. Afterwards, they are cleaned with acetone in an ultrasonic bath and rinsed with deionized water before the corrosion tests.
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) tests are carried out in a 3.5% NaCl solution at 298 K. A flat corrosion cell with three electrodes is used for the electrochemical experiments with a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), a platinum electrode, and the test sample is used as a reference, counter and working electrode, respectively. A sp-150 biologic electrochemical instrument (BioLogic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France) is used for the electrochemical corrosion test. EIS is performed for frequencies between 10 mHz and 100 kHz with alternating current (AC) amplitude of 10 mV at open circuit potential (OCP) after 60 min OCP monitoring. The EIS data are then fitted to the proposed equivalent circuit using EC-Lab V 10.40 software (BioLogic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France).

Metallographic Analysis
In order to check the microstructure of all six variants after rolling, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is used to investigate the effect of aluminum content on the grain size of these OPH alloys. Figure 2 shows the microstructures of the consolidated variants after rolling. The structures obtained are very fine grains without any signs of grain elongation due to rolling. The grains are stabilized by aluminum and Y-based nanoprecipitates [24]. The precipitates are formed during the hot rolling of the container, and/or are already during the heating of the powder to the rolling temperature. The Y-based nano-oxides are under 5 nm, and therefore cannot be seen on the microscope scan. However, it was confirmed that they grow during annealing at 1200 • C. As the nano-oxides are very stable against coarsening up to temperatures of 1000 • C, and their number density is kept very high, the Zener pinning effect is also active at these temperatures. The Zener pinning effect decreases due to the coarsening of nano-oxides at temperatures over 1200 • C, and secondary recrystallization takes place [25].
It is very difficult to measure the grain size with automatic software and therefore the evaluation is done by in-house software according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E112-13, "Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size". The average grain size is evaluated from five images, with 500 intersections measured for each. Figure 3 shows the average grain size versus aluminum contents for all OPH variants. It can be seen that the higher amount of aluminum resulted in coarser grains than the lower one. OP1 (6 wt. % Al) and OP2 (3.5 wt. % Al), with an average grain size of 115 nm, have bigger grains compared to the other percentages of aluminum. On the other hand, all four other variants (OP3, OP4, OP5, OP6) have almost the same average grain size of 103 nm, which is 10% less than OP1 and OP2. This trend confirms the influence of aluminum upon recrystallization. are cleaned with acetone in an ultrasonic bath and rinsed with deionized water before the corrosion tests.
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) tests are carried out in a 3.5% NaCl solution at 298 K. A flat corrosion cell with three electrodes is used for the electrochemical experiments with a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), a platinum electrode, and the test sample is used as a reference, counter and working electrode, respectively. A sp-150 biologic electrochemical instrument (BioLogic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France) is used for the electrochemical corrosion test. EIS is performed for frequencies between 10 mHz and 100 kHz with alternating current (AC) amplitude of 10 mV at open circuit potential (OCP) after 60 min OCP monitoring. The EIS data are then fitted to the proposed equivalent circuit using EC-Lab V 10.40 software (BioLogic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France).

Metallographic Analysis
In order to check the microstructure of all six variants after rolling, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is used to investigate the effect of aluminum content on the grain size of these OPH alloys. Figure 2 shows the microstructures of the consolidated variants after rolling. The structures obtained are very fine grains without any signs of grain elongation due to rolling. The grains are stabilized by aluminum and Y-based nanoprecipitates [24]. The precipitates are formed during the hot rolling of the container, and/or are already during the heating of the powder to the rolling temperature. The Ybased nano-oxides are under 5 nm, and therefore cannot be seen on the microscope scan. However, it was confirmed that they grow during annealing at 1200 °C. As the nano-oxides are very stable against coarsening up to temperatures of 1000 °C, and their number density is kept very high, the Zener pinning effect is also active at these temperatures. The Zener pinning effect decreases due to the coarsening of nano-oxides at temperatures over 1200 °C, and secondary recrystallization takes place [25]. It is very difficult to measure the grain size with automatic software and therefore the evaluation is done by in-house software according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E112-13, "Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size". The average grain size is evaluated from five images, with 500 intersections measured for each. Figure 3 shows the average grain size versus aluminum contents for all OPH variants. It can be seen that the higher amount of aluminum resulted in coarser grains than the lower one. OP1 (6 wt. % Al) and OP2 (3.5 wt. % Al), with an average grain size of 115 nm, have bigger grains compared to the other percentages of aluminum. On the other hand, all four other variants (OP3, OP4, OP5, OP6) have almost the same average grain size of 103 nm, which is 10% less than OP1 and OP2. This trend confirms the influence of aluminum upon recrystallization.   Figure 4 shows the hardness (HV10) test results for different OPH variants before annealing. The results show that the different Al contents in the OPH alloy has no significant effect on the hardness of these materials. The maximum hardness was found to be near 730 HV10 in the range of Al between 1.5 to 3 wt. %, while the average hardness stands near 700 HV10. OP1 (maximum Al content) and OP6 (minimum aluminum content) show the minimum hardness near 670 HV10.  Figure 4 shows the hardness (HV10) test results for different OPH variants before annealing. The results show that the different Al contents in the OPH alloy has no significant effect on the hardness of these materials. The maximum hardness was found to be near 730 HV10 in the range of Al between 1.5 to 3 wt. %, while the average hardness stands near 700 HV10. OP1 (maximum Al content) and OP6 (minimum aluminum content) show the minimum hardness near 670 HV10. Figure 4 shows the hardness (HV10) test results for different OPH variants before annealing. The results show that the different Al contents in the OPH alloy has no significant effect on the hardness of these materials. The maximum hardness was found to be near 730 HV10 in the range of Al between 1.5 to 3 wt. %, while the average hardness stands near 700 HV10. OP1 (maximum Al content) and OP6 (minimum aluminum content) show the minimum hardness near 670 HV10. In order to better understand the mechanical properties of all six variants of OPH, tensile tests at RT are performed. Figure 5 shows the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) for OPH alloys with different percentages of Al after annealing.  In order to better understand the mechanical properties of all six variants of OPH, tensile tests at RT are performed. Figure 5 shows the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) for OPH alloys with different percentages of Al after annealing. Figure 4 shows the hardness (HV10) test results for different OPH variants before annealing. The results show that the different Al contents in the OPH alloy has no significant effect on the hardness of these materials. The maximum hardness was found to be near 730 HV10 in the range of Al between 1.5 to 3 wt. %, while the average hardness stands near 700 HV10. OP1 (maximum Al content) and OP6 (minimum aluminum content) show the minimum hardness near 670 HV10. In order to better understand the mechanical properties of all six variants of OPH, tensile tests at RT are performed. Figure 5 shows the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) for OPH alloys with different percentages of Al after annealing.  The results show that the UTS decreases as Al content increases. Previous experiences of the authors show that the average UTS for such an OPH with similar chemical components is between 800 to 900 MPa [18,26,27], which confirms the measured results. Such a high value of UTS is most probably caused by the rather high number density of oxides in the OPH alloy. The influence of excess oxygen on the tensile strength is also confirmed by previous research [17,18,28], reporting that for a low content of 0.12% oxygen, almost the highest tensile strength is achieved, while higher excess oxygen made the tensile properties deteriorate. The deterioration can, however, be explained by the fact that the excess oxygen is not bound in stable oxides. In all cases, the solubility of oxygen in the matrix is practically zero, and all oxygen is present in the oxides of elements with the highest affinity to oxygen. That is why UTS variation is due to strengthening by oxides, and the different behavior of tensile properties correlates with the different grain and oxide particle distribution, because the hard dispersoids like oxides are bypassed by the formation of Orowan loops. Finer size and a higher number density of oxide particles lead to higher Orowan stress. In addition, uniform distribution of grains and oxide particles also affect the ductility of ODS steels. Moreover, high excess oxygen concentration may cause an inhomogeneous microstructure with a co-existence of fine and coarse oxide particles as well as grains, which could lead to a decrease of UTS.

Mechanical Properties
The aluminum content together with chromium plays a very important role in the high corrosion resistance of ODS steels [29]. Lee et al. reported that ODS steel with chromium content between 14% to 16% should contain aluminum between 3.5% to 4.5% to generate a dense and adherent alumina layer [30]. But the results from tensile testing showed that the increased content of alumina has a negative influence on the mechanical properties and the tensile strength is decreased from 950 MPa to approximately 750 MPa ( Figure 5). This was due to the reaction of alumina with Y 2 O 3 , because the Y 2 O 3 always reacts with alumina and residual oxygen to form coarse Y-Al-O particles (YAP, YAlO 3 and YAG, Y 3 Al 5 O 12 ). Without Al, the Y 2 O 3 can combine with Ti and form finer and more stable Y 2 Ti 2 O 7 nanoparticles [31]. To improve the mechanical properties of ODS steel, the coherent or semi-coherent interface between nanoparticles and the matrix is also important. Therefore also the Y-Al-O particles are not preferable for ODS steel [31]. The results also showed that there is almost no correlation between hardness values and tensile strength. For the hardness measurement, the interface between nanoparticles and the matrix is not so important. But, although the UTS should increase with the decreasing grain size, it seems that the UTS is predominantly determined by the amount of Al in the matrix.
Somehow, a linear correlation between hardness and UTS exists, but cannot be overestimated, since these properties are measurements of different capabilities of the material. UTS comes from tensile strength, which is the ability to resist being tensioned in one direction. The cause for the materials to fail or break when tensioned are the cracks that grow and compromise their integrity. On the other hand, hardness measures the resistance a surface has to being penetrated, which can reflect predominantly the properties from compressive tests. The entire load dispersion in the material is different and the material does not break, but is deformed. That being said, since the mechanisms of deformation and failure are not the same, one cannot directly compare these properties. If cast iron is taken as an example, its hardness is high and its tensile strength resistance is low, showing the independence between parameters. In the case of rather brittle materials the correlation can be rather weak [32,33].

Corrosion Properties
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is measured on OP1 to OP6 after annealing with different aluminum contents. Figure 6a-c show the Nyquist and Bode plots. Each plot consists of two capacitive loops. The large capacitive loop in the high frequency region is related to the double electric layer formed at the electrode/electrolyte interface [34], and the small capacitive loop in the low frequency region is caused by the passive film formed at the electrode surface [35]. Due to the presence of impermeable defects in the oxide surface layer, the capacitive loops are combined in parallel circuit. In the case of the Nyquist curves with two semicircles, the porous film equivalent circuit is often employed.
This circuit, which is equivalent to electrochemical reactions, takes place in the metal-oxide layer interface. The first semicircle (high frequency semicircle), indicates the electrochemical behavior of the outer layer, and the second semicircle (low-frequency semicircle) indicates the reactions occurring in the oxide layer. Many oxide-covered alloys behave like this in chloride-containing solutions [36,37]. The corrosion resistance is measured in the recrystallized state (after annealing), thus the grain size after rolling is irrelevant. The results of corrosion tests indicate that the Al content has a detrimental influence on the corrosion resistance at RT, but its influence can significantly change for corrosion at high temperatures in the presence of oxygen, when the formation of a protective alumina film may play a decisive role.
EIS plots of the OPH alloys are fitted with equivalent circuits shown in Figure 6d, and the EIS fitting results are presented in Table 2. Rs, Rpore and Rct are the solution resistance, passive film resistance, and charge transfer resistance, respectively. The constant phase element (CPE) is employed to evaluate the double electric layer at the electrode/electrolyte interface [36]. The electrical impedance of this CPE can be calculated from Equation (1).
where Q represents the capacitance of the double electric layer/oxide film, respectively, and n shows the closeness to the pure capacitance; for n = 1, CPE can be replaced with a pure capacitor. As it is understood from Figure 6 and Table 2, the accumulative resistances of the samples are increased from OP1 to OP6 while the aluminum content is decreased. Since the aluminum content of the samples is the main difference between the variants, the graph of charge transfer resistance (Rct) versus the aluminum percentage is plotted in Figure 7 as an exponential trend. It is also reported that the aluminum has a great effect on the mechanical behavior and microstructure of steels [38], but there are few reports on the corrosion resistance of steel with a high notable amount of aluminum. Aluminum is frequently used as a deoxidizing agent in steels which forms aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) and takes out the oxygen from the steel to produce deoxidized steel. Aluminum can also react with nitrogen in the melt and form AlN [39]. On the other hand, due to the very negative electrochemical potential of aluminum, more aluminum in the steel produces active phases and increases the corrosion reactions which can clearly be seen in Figure 7. This circuit, which is equivalent to electrochemical reactions, takes place in the metal-oxide layer interface. The first semicircle (high frequency semicircle), indicates the electrochemical behavior of the outer layer, and the second semicircle (low-frequency semicircle) indicates the reactions occurring in the oxide layer. Many oxide-covered alloys behave like this in chloride-containing solutions [36,37]. The corrosion resistance is measured in the recrystallized state (after annealing), thus the grain size after rolling is irrelevant. The results of corrosion tests indicate that the Al content has a detrimental influence on the corrosion resistance at RT, but its influence can significantly change for corrosion at high temperatures in the presence of oxygen, when the formation of a protective alumina film may play a decisive role.  Table 2. Electrochemical parameters of OP samples obtained from fitting the electrochemical impedance spectra in Figure 6.   Table 2. Electrochemical parameters of OP samples obtained from fitting the electrochemical impedance spectra in Figure 6.

ID
Where Q represents the capacitance of the double electric layer/oxide film, respectively, and n shows the closeness to the pure capacitance; for n = 1, CPE can be replaced with a pure capacitor. As it is understood from Figure 6 and Table 2, the accumulative resistances of the samples are increased from OP1 to OP6 while the aluminum content is decreased. Since the aluminum content of the samples is the main difference between the variants, the graph of charge transfer resistance (Rct) versus the aluminum percentage is plotted in Figure 7 as an exponential trend. It is also reported that the aluminum has a great effect on the mechanical behavior and microstructure of steels [38], but there are few reports on the corrosion resistance of steel with a high notable amount of aluminum. Aluminum is frequently used as a deoxidizing agent in steels which forms aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and takes out the oxygen from the steel to produce deoxidized steel. Aluminum can also react with nitrogen in the melt and form AlN [39]. On the other hand, due to the very negative electrochemical potential of aluminum, more aluminum in the steel produces active phases and increases the corrosion reactions which can clearly be seen in Figure 7.

Conclusions
The mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, hardness and microstructure of six different variants of a newly developed Fe-Al-O-based OPH alloy were investigated using a number of different tests. The results show that the aluminum content has a significant role on the mechanical and corrosion properties of these materials while it has less effect on the hardness value. Increasing the aluminum content has a negative influence on the tensile strength which decreased from 950 MPa to approximately 750 MPa. This is due to the reaction of aluminum with Y2O3 as the Y2O3 always reacts with aluminum and residual oxygen to form coarse Y-Al-O particles (YAP, YAlO3 and YAG, Y3Al5O12). On the other hand, the hardness value after rolling was in the range of 650 to 750 HV10 for all tested ODS steels. The results showed no appropriate correlation between hardness values and tensile strength depending on the aluminum content. Besides, the UTS is predominantly determined by the amount of Al in the matrix. A higher amount of aluminum resulted in coarser grains up to 115 nm after hot rolling.
The results of corrosion tests indicate that the Al content has a detrimental influence on the corrosion resistance at RT, but its influence can significantly change at elevated temperatures in the presence of oxygen, when the formation of a protective alumina film may play a decisive role. The corrosion resistance is increased by increasing the amount of aluminum.

Conclusions
The mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, hardness and microstructure of six different variants of a newly developed Fe-Al-O-based OPH alloy were investigated using a number of different tests. The results show that the aluminum content has a significant role on the mechanical and corrosion properties of these materials while it has less effect on the hardness value. Increasing the aluminum content has a negative influence on the tensile strength which decreased from 950 MPa to approximately 750 MPa. This is due to the reaction of aluminum with Y 2 O 3 as the Y 2 O 3 always reacts with aluminum and residual oxygen to form coarse Y-Al-O particles (YAP, YAlO 3 and YAG, Y 3 Al 5 O 12 ). On the other hand, the hardness value after rolling was in the range of 650 to 750 HV10 for all tested ODS steels. The results showed no appropriate correlation between hardness values and tensile strength depending on the aluminum content. Besides, the UTS is predominantly determined by the amount of Al in the matrix. A higher amount of aluminum resulted in coarser grains up to 115 nm after hot rolling.
The results of corrosion tests indicate that the Al content has a detrimental influence on the corrosion resistance at RT, but its influence can significantly change at elevated temperatures in the presence of oxygen, when the formation of a protective alumina film may play a decisive role. The corrosion resistance is increased by increasing the amount of aluminum. Funding: This research was funded by "Grantová AgenturaČeské Republiky (GAČR), The Czech Science Foundation, grant number 17-01641S" and "The APC was funded by 1500 CHF".