Next Article in Journal
Effects of Intermittent Neck Cooling During Repeated Bouts of High-Intensity Exercise
Previous Article in Journal
Differences in Spatial Physical Activity Patterns between Weekdays and Weekends in Primary School Children: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Accelerometry and Global Positioning System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Rowers’ Perceptions of On-Water Stroke Success to Evaluate Sculling Catch Efficiency Variables via a Boat Instrumentation System
Article

America’s Cup Sailing: Effect of Standing Arm-Cranking (“Grinding”) Direction on Muscle Activity, Kinematics, and Torque Application

1
Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), School of Sport and Recreation, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1020, New Zealand
2
Queensland Academy of Sport, QLD Sport & Athletics Centre, Kessels Rd, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia
3
High Performance Sport New Zealand, PO Box 302 563, North Shore 0751, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eling Douwe de Bruin
Sports 2016, 4(3), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports4030037
Received: 2 February 2016 / Revised: 6 June 2016 / Accepted: 8 June 2016 / Published: 27 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Boat-Based Sports Biomechanics)
Grinding is a key physical element in America’s Cup sailing. This study aimed to describe kinematics and muscle activation patterns in relation to torque applied in forward and backward grinding. Ten male America’s Cup sailors (33.6 ± 5.7 years, 97.9 ± 13.4 kg, 186.6 ± 7.4 cm) completed forward and backward grinding on a customised grinding ergometer. In forward grinding peak torque (77 Nm) occurred at 95° (0° = crank vertically up) on the downward section of the rotation at the end of shoulder flexion and elbow extension. Backward grinding torque peaked at 35° (69 Nm) following the pull action (shoulder extension, elbow flexion) across the top of the rotation. During forward grinding, relatively high levels of torque (>50 Nm) were maintained through the majority (72%) of the cycle, compared to 47% for backward grinding, with sections of low torque corresponding with low numbers of active muscles. Variation in torque was negatively associated with forward grinding performance (r = −0.60; 90% CI −0.88 to −0.02), but positively associated with backward performance (r = 0.48; CI = −0.15 to 0.83). Magnitude and distribution of torque generation differed according to grinding direction and presents an argument for divergent training methods to improve forward and backward grinding performance. View Full-Text
Keywords: yachting; biomechanics; movement analysis; performance yachting; biomechanics; movement analysis; performance
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pearson, S.N.; Hume, P.A.; Cronin, J.; Slyfield, D. America’s Cup Sailing: Effect of Standing Arm-Cranking (“Grinding”) Direction on Muscle Activity, Kinematics, and Torque Application. Sports 2016, 4, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports4030037

AMA Style

Pearson SN, Hume PA, Cronin J, Slyfield D. America’s Cup Sailing: Effect of Standing Arm-Cranking (“Grinding”) Direction on Muscle Activity, Kinematics, and Torque Application. Sports. 2016; 4(3):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports4030037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pearson, Simon N., Patria A. Hume, John Cronin, and David Slyfield. 2016. "America’s Cup Sailing: Effect of Standing Arm-Cranking (“Grinding”) Direction on Muscle Activity, Kinematics, and Torque Application" Sports 4, no. 3: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports4030037

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop