A Taxonomic Revision of the East Mediterranean Species of the Crematogaster scutellaris Complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material Examination
2.1.1. Material
2.1.2. Protocol for Morphometric Character Recording
2.2. Multivariate Statistics—Establishing the Morphospecies Hypothesis
2.2.1. Exploratory Analyses Using NC-PART Clustering
2.2.2. Allometric Correction for Principal Component Analyses
2.2.3. Hypothesis Testing Through Confirmatory Analyses
2.3. Visual Analysis and Geographic Distribution
3. Results
3.1. Morphological Pattern Recognition





3.2. Confirmatory Analyses
3.3. Geographic Distribution
| Character | C. ariadnae sp. n. (n = 66) | C. graeca sp. n. (n = 40) | C. ionia (n = 29) | C. schmidti (n = 66) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS | 971 ± 14 [869, 1127] | 1034 ± 17 [942, 1160] | 993 ± 18 [891, 1071] | 974 ± 15 [816, 1136] |
| CL/CW | 0.905 ± 0.005 [0.843, 0.959] | 0.898 ± 0.006 [0.864, 0.963] | 0.900 ± 0.004 [0.884, 0.923] | 0.902 ± 0.004 [0.871, 0.932] |
| POC/CL | 0.295 ± 0.002 [0.278, 0.316] | 0.287 ± 0.003 [0.268, 0.310] | 0.301 ± 0.004 [0.280, 0.324] | 0.298 ± 0.003 [0.280, 0.336] |
| FRS/CS | 0.388 ± 0.003 [0.362, 0.415] | 0.380 ± 0.003 [0.360, 0.396] | 0.366 ± 0.003 [0.347, 0.387] | 0.387 ± 0.003 [0.364, 0.435] |
| SL/CS | 0.787 ± 0.004 [0.758, 0.821] | 0.800 ± 0.005 [0.771, 0.845] | 0.788 ± 0.006 [0.759, 0.813] | 0.784 ± 0.004 [0.750, 0.837] |
| MW/CS | 0.618 ± 0.003 [0.579, 0.653] | 0.622 ± 0.005 [0.594, 0.651] | 0.610 ± 0.008 [0.572, 0.676] | 0.624 ± 0.003 [0.595, 0.663] |
| SPTI/CS | 0.461 ± 0.007 [0.358, 0.528] | 0.467 ± 0.009 [0.416, 0.531] | 0.432 ± 0.011 [0.376, 0.482] | 0.478 ± 0.007 [0.426, 0.554] |
| PEW/CS | 0.365 ± 0.004 [0.316, 0.400] | 0.355 ± 0.005 [0.329, 0.384] | 0.350 ± 0.006 [0.319, 0.389] | 0.374 ± 0.005 [0.345, 0.430] |
| PPW/CS | 0.299 ± 0.003 [0.269, 0.342] | 0.296 ± 0.004 [0.269, 0.320] | 0.291 ± 0.004 [0.273, 0.317] | 0.310 ± 0.003 [0.277, 0.329] |
| ML/CS | 1.087 ± 0.006 [1.020, 1.142] | 1.098 ± 0.007 [1.058, 1.147] | 1.059 ± 0.008 [1.010, 1.104] | 1.083 ± 0.006 [1.029, 1.157] |
| SPST/CS | 0.213 ± 0.003 [0.187, 0.257] | 0.217 ± 0.005 [0.182, 0.244] | 0.205 ± 0.005 [0.176, 0.241] | 0.221 ± 0.003 [0.197, 0.251] |
| NOL/CS | 0.250 ± 0.003 [0.214, 0.280] | 0.243 ± 0.003 [0.222, 0.264] | 0.236 ± 0.004 [0.219, 0.253] | 0.249 ± 0.003 [0.214, 0.272] |
| EL/CS | 0.253 ± 0.002 [0.234, 0.266] | 0.255 ± 0.003 [0.235, 0.273] | 0.247 ± 0.002 [0.236, 0.258] | 0.254 ± 0.002 [0.241, 0.271] |
| PLG/CS | 0.054 ± 0.001 [0.046, 0.064] | 0.063 ± 0.002 [0.050, 0.074] | 0.070 ± 0.002 [0.062, 0.079] | 0.063 ± 0.001 [0.055, 0.073] |
| GHL/CS | 0.088 ± 0.002 [0.072, 0.113] | 0.100 ± 0.003 [0.087, 0.126] | 0.105 ± 0.003 [0.087, 0.121] | 0.100 ± 0.001 [0.090, 0.112] |
| CS | CL/CW | POC/CL | FRS/CS | SL/CS | MW/CS | SPTI/CS | PEW/CS | PPW/CS | ML/CS | SPST/CS | NOL/CS | EL/CS | PLG/CS | GHL/CS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ariadnae-graeca | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| ariadnae-ionia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| ariadnae-schmidti | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||
| graeca-ionia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| graeca-schmidti | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| ionia-schmidti | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

3.4. Key to Workers of the East Mediterranean Species Crematogaster scutellaris Complex
- 1.
- Pubescence and hairs on 1st gastral tergite shorter: PLG/CS = 0.046–0.064, GHL/CS = 0.072–0.113. D1: 0.161 × PLG + 19.633 × SPST/CS + 58.405 × GHL/CS − 19.08 < 0 (error 3.0% in 66 workers and 0.0% in 21 nest means). Color often homogeneously dark brown to blackish, with head only slightly lighter than gaster. So far only known from Crete. ………………………….……………………………………………………. ariadnae sp. n.
- -
- Pubescence and hairs on 1st gastral tergite longer: PLG/CS = 0.050–0.079, GHL/CS = 0.087–0.126. D1 > 0 (error 7.4% in 135 workers and 0.0% in 47 nest means). Color homogeneously brown to blackish, or heterogeneous with lighter reddish-brown head, mesosoma, and waist, and dark brown to blackish gaster. So far not known from Crete. ………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
- 2.
- Distances between frontal carinae and between spine tips smaller: FRS/CS = 347–387, SPTI/CS = 0.376–0.482. Mesosoma shorter: ML/CS = 1.010–1.104. Pubescence on 1st gastral tergite longer: PLG/CS = 0.062–0.079. D2: 58.238 × FRS/CS + 23.193 × SPTI/CS − 145.744 × PLG/CS − 41.552 × POC/CL − 10.299 < 0 (error 0.0% in 29 workers). Color often homogeneously brownish, with head only slightly lighter than gaster. Aegean Islands and Anatolia. ……………………………………………………………………. ionia
- -
- Distances between frontal carinae and between spine tips larger: FRS/CS 360–435, SPTI/CS = 0.416–0.554. Mesosoma longer: ML/CS = 1.029–1.157. Pubescence on 1st gastral tergite shorter: PLG/CS = 0.050–0.074. D2 > 0 (error 5.7% in 135 workers and 0.0% in 36 nest means). Color homogeneously brown to blackish, or heterogeneous with lighter reddish-brown head, mesosoma, and waist, and dark brown to blackish gaster. ……………………………………………………………………………………….… 3
- 3.
- Petiole and postpetiole narrower: PEW/CS = 0.329–0.384, PPW/CS = 0.269–0.320. Postocular distance smaller: POC/CL = 0.268–0.310. Scape longer: SL/CS = 0.771–0.845. D3 = 0.053 × SL + 77.406 × PLG/CS − 0.033 × SPST − 33.516 × FRS/CS − 0.055 × POC − 11.582 > 0 (error 5.0% in 40 workers and 0.0% in 13 nest means). Color homogeneously brown to blackish, or heterogeneous with lighter reddish-brown head, mesosoma, and waist, and dark brown to blackish gaster. Balkans south of 42° N. …………………………………………………………………………………. graeca sp. n.
- -
- Petiole and postpetiole wider: PEW/CS = 0.345–0.430, PPW/CS = 0.277–0.329. Postocular distance larger: POC/CL = 0.280–0.336. Scape shorter: SL/CS = 0.750–0.837. D3 < 0 (error 3.0% in 66 workers and 0.0% in 23 nest means). Color often heterogeneous with lighter reddish-brown head, mesosoma, and waist, and dark brown to blackish gaster. Northwards until 47° N. ………………………………………………… schmidti
3.5. Taxonomy of the East Mediterranean Crematogaster scutellaris Complex


4. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bolton, B. An Online Catalog of the Ants of the World. Available online: https://antcat.org (accessed on 22 May 2026).
- Blaimer, B.B. A Subgeneric Revision of Crematogaster and Discussion of Regional Species-Groups (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 2012, 3482, 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ward, P.S.; Blaimer, B.B. Taxonomy in the Phylogenomic Era: Species Boundaries and Phylogenetic Relationships among North American Ants of the Crematogaster scutellaris Group (Formicidae: Hymenoptera). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2022, 194, 893–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Blaimer, B.B. Acrobat Ants Go Global—Origin, Evolution and Systematics of the Genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2012, 65, 421–436. [Google Scholar]
- Cagniant, H. Les Crematogaster du Maroc. Clé de détermination et commentaires. Orsis 2005, 20, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Arcos, J.; García, F. Hormigas de La Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares; Independently Published: Barcelona, Spain, 2024; ISBN 979-8-8725-7617-4. [Google Scholar]
- Salata, S.; Borowiec, L. Redescription of Crematogaster cypria Santschi, 1930, New Status, with Description of Two New Related Species from Greece and Turkey (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 2015, 505, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Salata, S.; Zięcina, D.; Borowiec, L. Crematogaster ourea sp. nov. a New Ant Species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Greece. Ann. Zool. 2024, 74, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Soulié, J. Les nids et le comportement nidificateur des fourmis du genre Crematogaster d’Europe, d’Afrique du Nord et d’Asie du Sud-Est. Insectes Soc. 1961, 8, 213–297. [Google Scholar]
- Lebas, C.; Galkowski, C.; Blatrix, R.; Wegnez, P. Fourmis d’Europe Occidentale; Delachaux et Niestlé: Paris, France, 2016; ISBN 978-2-603-02430-0. [Google Scholar]
- Gené, G. Memoria per Servire Alla Storia Naturale di Alcuni Imenotteri; Tip. della R. D. Camera: Modena, Italy, 1842. [Google Scholar]
- Way, M.J.; Cammell, M.E.; Paiva, M.R.; Collingwood, C.A. Distribution and Dynamics of the Argentine Ant Linepithema (Iridomyrmex) humile (Mayr) in Relation to Vegetation, Soil Conditions, Topography and Native Competitor Ants in Portugal. Insectes Soc. 1997, 44, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Carpintero, S.; Reyes-López, J.L.; Arias de Reyna, L. Impact of Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile) on an Arboreal Ant Community in Doñana National Park, Spain. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Santini, G.; Ramsay, C.A.; Tucci, L.; Ottonetti, L.; Frizzi, F. Spatial Patterns of the Ant Crematogaster scutellaris (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a Model Ecosystem. Ecol. Entomol. 2011, 36, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bernard, F. Faune de l’Europe et du Bassin Méditerranéen. 3. Les Fourmis (Hymenoptera Formicidae) d’Europe Occidentale et Septentrionale; Masson et Cie Éditeurs: Paris, France, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Kutter, H. Hymenoptera. Formicidae; Insecta Helvetica; Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft: Zürich, Switzerland, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Seifert, B. The Ants of Central and North Europe; Lutra Verlags- und Vertriebsgesellschaft: Tauer, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bračko, G. Atlas of the Ants of Slovenia; Biotechnical Faculty: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2023; ISBN 978-961-6379-69-4. [Google Scholar]
- Atanassov, N.; Dlussky, G.M. Fauna Na Bûlgariya. Hymenoptera, Formicidae; Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Press: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1992; ISBN 954-430-038-4. [Google Scholar]
- Zakharov, A.A. Ants of Forest Communities, Their Life Cycle and Role in Forests; Tovarishchestvo Nauchnykh Publikatsii KMK: Moskva, Russia, 2015. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Radchenko, A.G. The Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Ukraine; Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology: Kiev, Ukraine, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Emery, C. La Vita Delle Formiche; Fratelli Bocca: Torino, Italy, 1915. [Google Scholar]
- Goetsch, W. Ameisen- und Termiten-Studien in Ischia, Capri und Neapel. Zool. Jahrbücher Abt. Syst. Okol. Geogr. Tiere 1951, 80, 64–98. [Google Scholar]
- Goetsch, W. Beiträge zur Biologie spanischer Ameisen. Eos Rev. Esp. Entomol. 1942, 18, 175–241. [Google Scholar]
- Scarano, F.; Giannetti, D.; Trenti, F.; Giacomazzi, F.; Vigna, J.; Guella, G.; Grasso, D.A.; Haase, A. Trail Pheromone Identification in the Ant Crematogaster scutellaris. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Billen, J.P.J. Morphology of the Tibial Gland in the Ant Crematogaster scutellaris. Naturwissenschaften 1984, 71, 324–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kaudewitz, F. Zum Gastverhältnis zwischen Crematogaster scutellaris Ol. mit Camponotus lateralis bicolor Ol. Biol. Centralbl. 1955, 74, 69–87. [Google Scholar]
- Menzel, F.; Woywod, M.; Blüthgen, N.; Schmitt, T. Behavioural and Chemical Mechanisms behind a Mediterranean Ant-Ant Association. Ecol. Entomol. 2010, 35, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stukalyuk, S.; Gladun, D.; Akhmedov, A. Behavioural Patterns and Morphological Advantages Favour Successful Use of Crematogaster schmidti Trails by Camponotus lateralis Workers (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Serangga 2023, 27, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wagner, H.C.; Kraker, F.; Bračko, G.; Schifani, E. Extensive Field Observations Throw Light on the Evolution of Mimicry in Camponotus lateralis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e72530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Soulié, J. La ‘sociabilité’ des Crematogaster (Hymenoptera-Formicoidea). Insectes Soc. 1960, 7, 369–376. [Google Scholar]
- Marlier, J.F.; Quinet, Y.; de Biseau, J.C. Defensive Behaviour and Biological Activities of the Abdominal Secretion in the Ant Crematogaster scutellaris (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). Behav. Process. 2004, 67, 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Daloze, D.; Braekman, J.-C.; Vanhecke, P.; Boevé, J.-L.; Pasteels, J.M. Long Chain Electrophilic Contact Poisons from the Dufour’s Gland of the Ant Crematogaster scutellaris (Hymenoptera, Myrmicinae). Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 432–436. [Google Scholar]
- Daloze, D.; Kaisin, M.; Detrain, C.; Pasteels, J.M. Chemical Defense in the Three European Species of Crematogaster Ants. Experientia 1991, 47, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pasteels, J.M.; Daloze, D.; Boeve, J.L. Aldehydic Contact Poisons and Alarm Pheromone of the Ant Crematogaster scutellaris (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae): Enzyme-Mediated Production from Acetate Precursors. J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15, 1501–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wagner, H.C. Crematogaster scutellaris and Its Putative Mimic Camponotus lateralis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Are Underrepresented in Feces of Ant-Eating South-Alpine Wall-Lizards (Podarcis muralis maculiventris). Myrmecol. News 2025, 35, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraker, F.; Wagner, H.C. Evolutionary Arms Race in Ant-Ant Mimicry: Camponotus lateralis Lags behind in Mimicking Color Patterns and Sizes of Regional Crematogaster Models. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 41076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wagner, H.C.; Csősz, S. The “Chameleon Ant” Colobopsis imitans Adapts Its Mimetic Appearance to Local Model Species across the Mediterranean Basin (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e72674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pérez-Delgado, A.J.; Wagner, H.C. An Ant-Mimicking Ant on an Oceanic Archipelago: Camponotus guanchus Mimics Crematogaster alluaudi—An Analogy with the Situation of Camponotus lateralis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e70113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Olivier, A.G. Encyclopédie Méthodique. Histoire Naturelle. Insectes; Panckoucke: Paris, France, 1792; Volume 6, pp. 369–704. [Google Scholar]
- Mayr, G.L. Einige Neue Ameisen. Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ver. Wien 1853, 2, 143–150. [Google Scholar]
- Scupola, A. Le Formiche del Veneto: Guida Alla Conoscenza Delle Formiche e All’identificazione Delle Specie del Veneto = Ants of Veneto: Natural History of Ants and Identification of the Species from Veneto, Italy; WBA Handbooks: Verona, Italy, 2018; ISBN 978-88-903323-8-8. [Google Scholar]
- Castro-Delgado, S.R.; Colla, A. Diversity, Abundance and Composition of Ant Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Selected Urban Green Areas of Trieste (Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy) in the Year 2018. Atti Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Trieste 2024, 65, 125–158. [Google Scholar]
- Gallé, L.; Kovács, É.; Csősz, S.; Somogyi, A.Á.; Tartally, A.; Báthori, F.; Tánczos, E. (Eds.) Contribution to the Distribution of Ant Species in Hungary; Debrecen University Press: Debrecen, Hungary, 2022; ISBN 978-963-490-996-2. [Google Scholar]
- Markó, B. Six New Ant Species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for the Romanian Myrmecofauna. Entomol. Rom. 1998, 3, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
- Petrov, I.Z. A List of Currently Known Ant Species (Formicidae, Hymenoptera) of Serbia. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2004, 56, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lapeva-Gjonova, A.; Antonova, V. An Updated Checklist of Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Bulgaria, after 130 Years of Research. BDJ 2022, 10, e95599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zimmermann, S. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Ameisenfauna Süddalmatiens. Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 1935, 84, 1–65. [Google Scholar]
- Bračko, G.; Gomboc, M.; Lupše, B.; Marić, R.; Pristovšek, U. New Faunistic Data on Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Southern Part of Montenegro. Nat. Slov. 2014, 16, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bračko, G.; Wagner, H.C.; Schulz, A.; Gioahin, E.; Matičič, J.; Tratnik, A. New Investigation and a Revised Checklist of the Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Republic of Macedonia. North-West. J. Zool. 2014, 10, 10–24. [Google Scholar]
- Borowiec, L.; Salata, S. Additional Data on Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Peloponnese. Ann. Up. Silesian Mus. Bytom Entomol. 2024, 33, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiran, K.; Karaman, C. Additions to the Ant Fauna of Turkey (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zoosystema 2020, 42, 285–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kiran, K.; Karaman, C. Ant Fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Central Anatolian Region of Turkey. Turk. J. Zool. 2021, 45, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bračko, G. New Data on the Ant Fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Azerbaijan. Cauc. Entomol. Bull. 2019, 15, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Paknia, O.; Radchenko, A.G.; Alipanah, H.; Pfeiffer, M. A Preliminary Checklist of the Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Iran. Myrmecol. News 2008, 11, 151–159. [Google Scholar]
- Forel, A.-H. Fourmis Nouvelles Ou Intéressantes. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 1911, 47, 331–400. [Google Scholar]
- Collingwood, C.A. A Comparative Study of the Ant Fauna of Five Greek Islands. Biol. Gallo-Hell. 1993, 20, 191–197. [Google Scholar]
- Salata, S.; Borowiec, L.; Trichas, A. Review of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Crete, with Keys to Species Determination and Zoogeographical Remarks; Monographs of the Upper Silesian Museum: Bytom, Poland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Demetriou, J.; Georgiadis, C.; Ralli, V.; Salata, S.; Borowiec, L. Setting the Record Straight: A Re-Examination of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Cyprus Deposited at the Museum of Zoology of Athens. Zootaxa 2024, 5523, 49–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Borowiec, L.; Salata, S. A Monographic Review of Ants of Greece (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Vol. 2. Review of the Subfamily Myrmicinae Except the Genera Temnothorax and Tetramorium; Natural History Monographs of the Upper Silesian Museum: Bytom, Poland; Department of Natural History Upper Silesian Museum: Bytom, Poland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Csősz, S.; Báthori, F.; Rádai, Z.; Herczeg, G.; Fisher, B.L. Comparing Ant Morphology Measurements from Microscope and Online AntWeb.Org 2D Z-stacked Images. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 13, e9897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Seifert, B.; Ritz, M.; Csősz, S. Application of Exploratory Data Analyses Opens a New Perspective in Morphology-Based Alpha-Taxonomy of Eusocial Organisms. Myrmecol. News 2014, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsen, G.; Borgan, Ø.; Liestøl, K.; Lingjærde, O.C. Identifying Clusters in Genomics Data by Recursive Partitioning. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2013, 12, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Csősz, S.; Fisher, B.L. Taxonomic Revision of the Malagasy Members of the Nesomyrmex angulatus Species Group Using the Automated Morphological Species Delineation Protocol NC-PART-Clustering. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lleonart, J.; Salat, J.; Torres, G.J. Removing Allometric Effects of Body Size in Morphological Analysis. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 205, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tschinkel, W.R.; Mikheyev, A.S.; Storz, S.R. Allometry of Workers of the Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta. J. Insect Sci. 2003, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Molet, M.; Péronnet, R.; Couette, S.; Canovas, C.; Doums, C. Effect of Temperature and Social Environment on Worker Size in the Ant Temnothorax nylanderi. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 67, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Seifert, B. Removal of Allometric Variance Improves Species Separation in Multi-Character Discriminant Functions When Species Are Strongly Allometric and Exposes Diagnostic Characters. Myrmecol. News 2008, 11, 91–105. [Google Scholar]
- Baur, H.; Leuenberger, C. Analysis of Ratios in Multivariate Morphometry. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Seifert, B. Surviving the Winter: Tetramorium sibiricum n. sp., a New Central Siberian Ant Species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Osmia 2021, 9, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Csősz, S.; Fisher, B. Diagnostic Survey of Malagasy Nesomyrmex Species-Groups and Revision of hafahafa Group Species via Morphology Based Cluster Delimitation Protocol. ZooKeys 2015, 526, 19–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Moder, K.; Schlick-Steiner, B.C.; Steiner, F.M.; Cremer, S.; Christian, E.; Seifert, B. Optimal Species Distinction by Discriminant Analysis: Comparing Established Methods of Character Selection with a Combination Procedure Using Ant Morphometrics as a Case Study. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2007, 45, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Auguie, B.; Antonov, A. gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for “Grid” Graphics, R Package Version 2.3. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=gridExtra (accessed on 15 April 2026).
- QGIS Development Team QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. 2019. Available online: https://www.qgis.org (accessed on 13 December 2022).
- Seifert, B. The Gene and Gene Expression (GAGE) Species Concept: An Universal Approach for All Eukaryotic Organisms. Syst. Biol. 2020, 69, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Holm, S. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 1979, 6, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruzsky, M.D. The Ants of Russia. (Formicariae Imperii Rossici). Systematics, Geography and Data on the Biology of Russian Ants. Part I. Tr. Obs. Estestvoispyt. Pri Imp. Kazan. Univ. 1905, 38, 1–800. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Gratiashvili, N.; Barjadze, S. Checklist of the Ants (Formicidae Latreille, 1809) of Georgia. Proc. Inst. Zool. 2008, 23, 130–146. [Google Scholar]
- Borowiec, L.; Salata, S. Review of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Jordan. Ann. Up. Silesian Mus. Bytom Entomol. 2020, 29, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vonshak, M.; Ionescu-Hirsch, A. A Checklist of the Ants of Israel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Isr. J. Entomol. 2009, 39, 33–55. [Google Scholar]
- Bračko, G.; Kiran, K.; Karaman, C.; Salata, S.; Borowiec, L. Survey of the Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Greek Thrace. Biodivers. Data J. 2016, 4, e7945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kiran, K.; Karaman, C. First Annotated Checklist of the Ant Fauna of Turkey (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 2012, 3548, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]


| Abbr. | Verbal Character Definition |
|---|---|
| CL | Maximum cephalic length in median line; head must be carefully tilted to position with actual maximum. Excavations of hind vertex and/or clypeus, if any, reduce CL (Figure 1A). |
| CS | Cephalic size: arithmetic mean of CL and CW. |
| CW | Maximum width of head capsule, measured across eyes (Figure 1A). |
| EL | Maximum diameter of a compound eye (Figure 1B). |
| FRS | Minimum distance between frontal carinae (Figure 1A). |
| GHL | Longest erect hair on 1st gastral tergite, typically found near posterior border of tergite. |
| ML | Mesosoma length from caudalmost point of propodeal lobe to transition point (=point of inflection) between convex anterior pronotal slope and concave anterior pronotal shield in lateral view (Figure 1B). |
| MW | Maximum pronotal width (Figure 1C). |
| NOL | Length of petiolar node, measured in lateral view from petiolar spiracle to the nearest point of the caudal cylinder (Figure 1B). |
| PEW | Maximum width of petiole (Figure 1C). |
| PLG | Arithmetic mean of three longest pubescence hairs on central area of 1st gastral tergite. |
| POC | Postocular distance. Use cross-scaled ocular micrometer and adjust head to CL measuring position. Caudal measuring point: median occipital margin; frontal measuring point: median head at level of posterior eye margin (Figure 1A). |
| PPW | Maximum width of postpetiole (Figure 1C). |
| SL | Maximum straight line scape length excluding articular condyle (Figure 1A). |
| SPST | Distance between center of propodeal stigma and spine tip. The stigma center refers to midpoint defined by outer cuticular ring, but not to center of real stigma opening that may be positioned eccentrically (Figure 1B). |
| SPTI | Distance between spine tips in dorsal view (Figure 1C). |
| Type | ariadnae sp. n. | graeca sp. n. | ionia | schmidti |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| schmidti paratype CASENT0908487 | 0.031 | 0.001 | 0.023 | 0.945 |
| medispina_syntype CASENT0908488 | 0.002 | 0.013 | 0.001 | 0.984 |
| christowitchii MHNG-ENTO-0296684 | 0.379 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.620 |
| christowitchii MHNG-ENTO-0296687 | 0.088 | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.898 |
| ionia syntype FOCOL1448 | 0.011 | 0.130 | 0.711 | 0.148 |
| ionia syntype CASENT0908491 | 0.001 | 0.990 | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| ariadnae sp. n. | graeca sp. n. | ionia | schmidti | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/i | 21/66 | 13/40 | 11/29 | 23/66 |
| ariadnae sp. n. | ||||
| graeca sp. n. | 1.9 (5) | |||
| ionia | 0.0 (2) | 5.8 (4) | ||
| schmidti | 3.0 (7) | 4.7 (5) | 0.0 (8) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Csősz, S.; El-Ghor, L.; Wagner, H.C. A Taxonomic Revision of the East Mediterranean Species of the Crematogaster scutellaris Complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insects 2026, 17, 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060658
Csősz S, El-Ghor L, Wagner HC. A Taxonomic Revision of the East Mediterranean Species of the Crematogaster scutellaris Complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insects. 2026; 17(6):658. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060658
Chicago/Turabian StyleCsősz, Sándor, Laura El-Ghor, and Herbert C. Wagner. 2026. "A Taxonomic Revision of the East Mediterranean Species of the Crematogaster scutellaris Complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)" Insects 17, no. 6: 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060658
APA StyleCsősz, S., El-Ghor, L., & Wagner, H. C. (2026). A Taxonomic Revision of the East Mediterranean Species of the Crematogaster scutellaris Complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insects, 17(6), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17060658

