Compatibility of Bioinsecticides with Parasitoids for Enhanced Integrated Pest Management of Drosophila suzukii and Tuta absoluta

Simple Summary Management strategies targeting invasive pests of agricultural crops have relied heavily on the application of synthetic insecticides. However, sustainable pest management approaches and tools are being effectively implemented. The use of microbials, botanicals, and other natural-based substances alone or in combination with natural enemies is a promising approach. In this context, in the laboratory, we studied the potential synergistic or antagonistic effects in pest control of various biopesticides with Ganaspis kimorum and Necremnus tutae, two major parasitoids of the spotted wing Drosophila and the South American tomato pinworm, respectively. Abstract Drosophila suzukii and Tuta absoluta are successful biological invaders of agroecosystems. Their integrated pest management (IPM) programs involve the release and/or conservation of natural enemies. Among these, Ganaspis kimorum is a major Asian parasitoid of D. suzukii and has been introduced as a classical biological control agent of this pest in Europe and North America, while Necremnus tutae is a key fortuitous parasitoid of T. absoluta in the Mediterranean region. Bioinsecticides represent key alternatives to chemicals for controlling both pests. This study investigated the potential compatibility of both parasitoids with Beauveria bassiana, Bacillus thuringiensis, garlic essential oil (EO), and spinosad, in comparison to two synthetic insecticides, cyantraniliprole and chlorantraniliprole. The results showed that combining each of the tested insecticides with G. kimorum slightly increased pest mortality compared to the insecticide alone. Necremnus tutae had a significant additive effect on host mortality when combined with insecticides. Beauveria bassiana and B. thuringiensis were most compatible with both parasitoid species. Both garlic EO and chlorantraniliprole impaired the survival of immature N. tutae and showed sublethal toxicity on the reproductive and non-reproductive behaviors of N. tutae. Spinosad exhibited high acute toxicity on both juvenile and adult parasitoids of both species. Overall, these findings provide useful insights into insecticide selectivity toward two key parasitoids and offer new knowledge on the potential of combining natural enemies and bioinsecticides for optimized IPM.


Introduction
Biological invasions represent one of the most prominent consequences of globalization as a high number of introduced species have been shown to be harmful to agriculture and native biodiversity in newly invaded regions [1][2][3][4].Arthropod pests are among the major unintentionally introduced species and their invasion trend is projected to increase over time, especially in Europe, where they cause significant economic losses and ecological disruptions [5].Although current guidelines promote integrated pest management (IPM) programs that minimize chemical inputs, insecticides represent the main tool approached by farmers to manage invasive pest infestations [6][7][8].This attitude is largely due to the lack of cost-effective control strategies in the invaded regions [9][10][11] and the effectiveness of chemical insecticides for a quick reduction in pest populations [12,13].
However, the reliance on chemicals comes at a significant cost to the environment and human economy due to pesticide bioaccumulation, slow degradation, and non-target effects [14,15], alongside the low tolerance for pesticide maximum residue limits (MRLs), which strongly affect fruit marketability [10].Moreover, the limited number of chemical molecules registered for invasive species and their routine applications in the field pose additional challenges related to the development of insecticide resistance and the loss of effectiveness of agrochemicals [16].In response to these challenges, biopesticides have emerged as eco-friendly and cost-effective tools for suppressing arthropod pests in conventional and organic farms.Indeed, these products, which derive from naturally occurring living organisms, such as plants (namely, plant extracts and essential oils), microbials (i.e., bacteria, viruses, and fungi), and animals (e.g., arthropod toxins), are thought to have a negligible or low risk of resistance phenomena and few MRLs restrictions [17].
The increased interest of the pesticide industry in developing safer and promising alternatives to control key invasive pests has significantly improved the relevance of biopesticides over time [18][19][20].Notable examples include the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) [21,22], and the South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) [18].These invasive species threaten the worldwide production of soft-skinned fruits and tomato crops, respectively, due to their high reproductive potential and the cryptic nature of their larvae [6,10,23,24].In particular, D. suzukii oviposits on ripe and healthy fruits [25], while T. absoluta mainly infests leaves but also the stems and fruits of tomatoes and other solanaceous crops [13] and was recently confirmed to have an epidemiological role in the spread of a tomato virus [26].
Several bioinsecticides have been tested on D. suzukii and T. absoluta, with spinosad, azadirachtin, and pyrethrins among the most common active ingredients targeting both insect pests.While commonly used bioinsecticides mainly target D. suzukii adults, they can also affect pest immature stages and/or natural enemies because of their broad-spectrum action [10,27,28].Avermectins, essential oils, and microbial-based biopesticides are additional tools for managing T. absoluta in organic contexts [18,[29][30][31].In particular, the use of microbials, such as entomopathogenic bacteria (i.e., Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) var.kurstaki and aizawaii) and entomopathogenic lepidopteran granuloviruses (i.e., members of the genus Betabaculovirus), represents a commonly implemented biological control strategy targeting T. absoluta larvae [13,32,33].However, the combined use of biopesticides with macro-biocontrol agents (including parasitoids) needs to be properly assessed to maximize their biocontrol services and the sustainability of IPM programs.In this context, it is worth noting that the origin of a given agrochemical is not always associated with its toxicological features and safety perception [34,35].
Various studies have shown the non-target impact of insecticides with different origins and Mechanisms of Action (MoA) towards key natural enemies of D. suzukii [28,36] and T. absoluta [37][38][39].However, the potential compatibility of biopesticides with Ganaspis kimorum Buffington (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) and Necremnus tutae Ribes & Bernardo (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), which are among the most important larval parasitoids of D. suzukii and T. absoluta, respectively, is still poorly investigated.Quarantine studies showed the koinobiont endoparasitoid G. kimorum, formerly recognized as G. cf.brasiliensis (Ihering), as the most promising natural enemy for the classical biological control of D. suzukii because of its host-specificity [40,41].Consequently, field releases of this parasitoid are currently ongoing in Europe and the US in the framework of a classical biological control program [42,43].Ganaspis cf.brasiliensis consists of a complex of cryptic species (G1-G5), whose taxonomic identity was recently clarified by Sosa-Calvo et al. [44], who reclassified the G1 lineage of G. cf brasiliensis as G. kimorum sp.nov.Meanwhile, the idiobiont ectoparasitoid N. tutae is among the most abundant and widespread parasitoids of T. absoluta in Europe and Africa [45].Native to the Mediterranean region, N. tutae is a hostfeeding parasitoid of T. absoluta larvae causing both reproductive and non-reproductive host mortality [46,47].These attributes, along with its common occurrence in tomato greenhouses, make this parasitoid one of the most promising biocontrol agents to be integrated into IPM programs [48,49].
This study aimed to investigate the non-target effects of field concentrations of three biopesticides (microbials and botanicals) commonly used in organic and/or conventional agroecosystems affected by D. suzukii and T. absoluta and that of an experimental formulation of garlic essential oil (EO) towards G. kimorum and N. tutae.Specifically, we assessed the acute toxicity (lethal effect) on parasitoid adults and the sublethal effects on their reproductive capacity (fertility) when exposed to pesticide-treated and infested blueberries (for D. suzukii/G.kimorum) or tomato leaves (for T. absoluta/N.tutae), under laboratory conditions.This allowed the simultaneous testing of the lethal and sublethal effects of insecticide residual contact on parasitoids and the combined effect of the insecticide and parasitoid on host mortality.The information may serve as a basis for the potential integration of biopesticides into current biological control strategies against these invasive pests.

Insects
A colony of D. suzukii was initiated from field samplings of wild blackberries (Rubus sp.) in eastern Sicily, Italy (37 • 39 ′ 47.39 ′′ N, 14 • 54 ′ 3.06 ′′ E), in 2015.Adult flies were reared in insect cages (32.5 × 32.5 × 32.5 cm) (BugDorm ® , MegaView, Taichung, Taiwan) under standard laboratory conditions according to Lisi et al. [28] with slight modifications (23 ± 1 • C, 55 ± 10% R.H., 16 h:8 h L:D photoperiod).Plastic Drosophila vials were filled with cornmeal artificial diet prepared according to Dalton et al. [50] and then provided to adult flies inside the rearing cage to allow them to oviposit, with a honey-water (1:1) solution provided as supplemental food for the flies.The initial colony of the larval parasitoid G. kimorum (formerly G1 G. brasiliensis in the previous literature, see Lisi et al. [42]) originated from individuals collected in their native range and emerged from D. suzukiiinfested fruits [51].A colony of the parasitoid was provided to us through the Sicilian Phytosanitary Service (Regione Siciliana) in 2021, in the context of a classical biological control program [42].The parasitoid was reared according to Rossi-Stacconi et al. [52].Briefly, wasps were maintained at 23 ± 1 • C, 60 ± 10% R.H, and a 16 h:8 h L:D photoperiod in a BugDorm ® cage and reared on D. suzukii larvae in infested blueberries.Infested fruits bearing parasitized larvae were incubated for 30 ± 2 days and newly emerged parasitoids were collected for further rearing or experiments.
For the rearing of N. tutae, tomato plants infested by larval instars (L2-L3) of T. absoluta were exposed to the parasitoids (ratio: ten larvae for each parasitoid couple) for three days in BugDorm ® cages (MegaView, Taichung, Taiwan), supplied with honey-water solution (1:1).Following the exposure, tomato plants with parasitized larvae were transferred to other rearing cages for 15 ± 3 days until the emergence of adult wasps.

Lethal and Sublethal Effects of Insecticides on Ganaspis kimorum
Drosophila suzukii adults were provided with fresh, untreated, and healthy blueberries for 6-8 h to allow them to oviposit (as described above for fly rearing).Then, infested berries were checked under the microscope to select fruits bearing 8 ± 2 eggs.The day after (i.e., following the egg-hatching), fifteen infested fruits were dipped for ten seconds in each insecticide solution and distilled water was used as an untreated control.Then, the fruits were left to dry for 30 min inside a laminar flow hood.For each treatment and replicate, one treated blueberry was offered to a pair of G. kimorum (two-to four-day-old males and females) for 72 h inside an experimental arena (Ø × h: 100 × 50 mm) covered with a mesh net lid to ensure proper ventilation and provided with a foam rubber plug soaked in a honey-water solution (1:1) to feed wasps.Two-to four-day-old parasitoid couples were tested at that age because of their reproductive traits.Ganaspis kimorum is a weakly pro-ovigenic species and reaches a peak of mature egg load three to five days after emergence [53].In addition, parasitoid couples were kept continuously in the experimental arena together with host larvae for 72 h (becoming five to seven days old at the end of the experiment), allowing them to successfully parasitize their respective host larvae.Overall, 15 parasitoid couples (i.e., 15 males and 15 females) were tested per treatment.During the exposure time, parasitoid survival was checked at 24, 48, and 72 h.Afterward, surviving wasps were individually transferred to similar experimental arenas and provided with a new healthy untreated blueberry and a honey-water solution twice a week.Ganaspis kimorum mortality was monitored daily for 30 consecutive days or until the wasps died following insecticide exposure.This exposure sequence was kept constant and was chosen to reflect a real field scenario where farmers promptly spray insecticides when D. suzukii infestations occur in crops.Notably, this is the same time frame when the inoculative releases of G. kimorum are performed in the field in the framework of the classical biological control program.
A complementary bioassay consisted of insecticide-and distilled water-treated fruits, without exposure to parasitoids to evaluate the mortality of D. suzukii larvae induced by each tested insecticide.Blueberries of both bioassays (i.e., in the presence and absence of parasitism) were incubated for 30 ± 2 days at 23 ± 1 • C, 60 ± 10% R.H, and 16h:8h L:D photoperiod, and the number of emerged flies and/or parasitoids was counted to assess the G. kimorum apparent parasitism (AP), according to Seehausen et al. [40].The AP was calculated as the proportion of emerged adult parasitoids among the total number of adult insects that emerged from blueberries [40].Both the individual and combined effects of insecticide and/or parasitoid on pest mortality were assessed.

Lethal and Sublethal Effects of Insecticides on Necremnus tutae
For each treatment and replicate, ten second-instar T. absoluta larvae were gently transferred with a soft brush onto a compound tomato leaf consisting of at least five leaflets.The leaf petiole was previously dipped in a vial filled with an agar-water solution at 1% to ensure leaf turgor during the experiments.After all T. absoluta larvae had produced mines in the leaf mesophyll, each infested leaf was dipped into the insecticide solution or distilled water for ten seconds and then left to dry for half an hour inside a laminar flow hood.Each treated leaf was then exposed to a pair of N. tutae (two-to four-day-old males and females) for 72 h inside an arena (length of 130 mm, width of 80 mm, and height of 70 mm) covered with a net lid where the internal surface was sprayed with a honey-water solution (1:1) to provide food for the wasps during the bioassay.The decision to test two-to four-day-old N. tutae pairs was related to the parasitoid reproductive traits.Indeed, this parasitoid species exhibits higher fecundity in its early adult life reaching higher daily mean oviposition rates when five to seven days old [46].In addition, parasitoid couples were kept continuously in the experimental arena together with T. absoluta larvae for 72 h (becoming five to seven days old at the end of the experiment), allowing them to successfully parasitize their respective host larvae.Overall, 15 N. tutae couples (i.e., 15 females and 15 males) were tested per treatment.
The mortality of the parasitoids was checked at 24, 48, and 72 h.To determine the relative importance of non-reproductive and reproductive effects of N. tutae on its host larvae [47], exposed T. absoluta larvae were observed under the microscope at the end of the 72 h of exposure to assess the insecticide effect on the parasitoid-host interactions, i.e., the percentages of (i) parasitized host larvae (parasitism); (ii) killed host through host-feeding (i.e., parasitoid feeding on host hemolymph to continue egg production and maturation) and host-killing (i.e., parasitoid lethally stings host larvae without reproductive output), which are both referred as non-reproductive effects.At the end of 72 h of exposure, surviving wasps were individually moved into similar experimental arenas and provided healthy untreated tomato leaves and a honey-water solution twice a week.The wasps were checked daily for 30 consecutive days or until they died to assess the survival time following the exposure to insecticide residues.In order to evaluate the mortality of T. absoluta larvae induced by each insecticide and distilled water in the absence of parasitism, a complementary bioassay was performed without exposing T. absoluta-infested leaves to parasitoids.
Tomato leaves from both bioassays (i.e., in the presence and absence of parasitism) were incubated in aerated arenas (same as above) for 15 ± 3 days at 26 ± 1 • C, 60 ± 10% R.H, and 14:10 L.D., to count the number of emerged pest and/or parasitoid adults and evaluate the individual or combined effect of insecticides and parasitoid on pest mortality.The parasitoid juvenile survival was also assessed as the proportion of N. tutae offspring that developed from egg to adult on parasitized host larvae [37].

Data Analysis
Differences in G. kimorum and N. tutae survival after 24, 48, and 72 h of contact exposure to insecticide residue and differences in pest mortality at the end of the experiment for each tested insecticide were analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values (p < 0.05) because mortality data did not fulfill the assumptions for the analysis of variance (ANOVA).For each insecticide treatment and tested parasitoid species, differences among treatments in male and female mortality at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).To assess the impact of residual contact exposure to insecticides on the survival of both parasitoid species and estimate median survival times (LT 50 ), time-mortality data were submitted to survival analysis by the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test.Parasitoids alive at the end of the 30-day observations following the insecticide residual contact exposure were treated as censored [54].Spinosad was excluded from the dataset for N. tutae survival analysis because no parasitoid adult survived after 72 h of residual contact exposure to this insecticide (100% adult mortality).In the case of overall log-rank test significance, a paired comparison of any two survival curves was made using the Holm method (p < 0.05) (RStudio 2023.12.1).
Data concerning reproductive mortality, non-reproductive mortality, and juvenile survival of N. tutae, as well as those related to G. kimorum apparent parasitism, were analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
To assess the effect of different treatments (i.e., parasitoid and insecticide alone or their combinations) on the mortality of both pests, the obtained data were previously corrected by means of Abbott's formula using corresponding control mortalities (i.e., pest exposure to distilled water in absence of parasitism) and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc tests (p < 0.05).In each treatment, the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05) was also used to investigate differences in host pest mortality between the insecticide alone or in combination with the parasitoid.The non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted using IBM ® SPSS ® Statistics for Macintosh, Version 23.0.0.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Figure 1.
Cumulative mortality (Mean % ± SE) of Ganaspis kimorum adults evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to each tested insecticide.Different lower-case letters, capital letters, and lowercase italic letters indicate significant differences among insecticides after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected pvalues, p ≤ 0.05).Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences among the three exposure durations (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 2.
Cumulative mortality (Mean % ± SE) of Necremnus tutae adults evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to each tested insecticide.Different lower-case letters, capital letters, and lower-case italic letters indicate significant differences among insecticides after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected pvalues, p ≤ 0.05).Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences among the three exposure durations (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).

Insecticide Effects on Ganaspis kimorum Parasitism
The apparent parasitism of G. kimorum on D. suzukii was significantly affected by the insecticide treatment (H = 11.09;df = 5; p = 0.049).Exposure of the parasitoid to untreated blueberries (control) resulted in an apparent parasitism of 23.2 ± 4.4%.Spinosad was the only compound that significantly reduced the parasitism by 3.46-fold when compared to the control treatment, and there was no significant difference among other insecticide treatments (Figure 3).

Insecticide Effects on Necremnus tutae Parasitism and Host Killing
The non-reproductive mortality (host feeding + host killing) caused by N. tutae on T. absoluta larvae was significantly affected by the treatment (H = 56.190;df = 5; p < 0.001) (Table 1).In particular, it was significantly higher for parasitoids exposed to distilled water

Insecticide Effects on Ganaspis kimorum Parasitism
The apparent parasitism of G. kimorum on D. suzukii was significantly affected by the insecticide treatment (H = 11.09;df = 5; p = 0.049).Exposure of the parasitoid to untreated blueberries (control) resulted in an apparent parasitism of 23.2 ± 4.4%.Spinosad was the only compound that significantly reduced the parasitism by 3.46-fold when compared to the control treatment, and there was no significant difference among other insecticide treatments (Figure 3).

Figure 2.
Cumulative mortality (Mean % ± SE) of Necremnus tutae adults evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to each tested insecticide.Different lower-case letters, capital letters, and lower-case italic letters indicate significant differences among insecticides after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected pvalues, p ≤ 0.05).Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences among the three exposure durations (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).

Insecticide Effects on Ganaspis kimorum Parasitism
The apparent parasitism of G. kimorum on D. suzukii was significantly affected by the insecticide treatment (H = 11.09;df = 5; p = 0.049).Exposure of the parasitoid to untreated blueberries (control) resulted in an apparent parasitism of 23.2 ± 4.4%.Spinosad was the only compound that significantly reduced the parasitism by 3.46-fold when compared to the control treatment, and there was no significant difference among other insecticide treatments (Figure 3).

Insecticide Effects on Necremnus tutae Parasitism and Host Killing
The non-reproductive mortality (host feeding + host killing) caused by N. tutae on T. absoluta larvae was significantly affected by the treatment (H = 56.190;df = 5; p < 0.001) (Table 1).In particular, it was significantly higher for parasitoids exposed to distilled water

Insecticide Effects on Necremnus tutae Parasitism and Host Killing
The non-reproductive mortality (host feeding + host killing) caused by N. tutae on T. absoluta larvae was significantly affected by the treatment (H = 56.190;df = 5; p < 0.001) (Table 1).In particular, it was significantly higher for parasitoids exposed to distilled water (control), B. thuringiensis, and B. bassiana, when compared to the other three treatments, accounting for a high proportion of total host mortality (Table 1).The percentage of T. absoluta larvae killed due to the parasitoid's non-reproductive activity greatly decreased by 2.76-fold, 6.27-fold, and 17.25-fold for chlorantraniliprole, garlic EO, and spinosad, respectively, compared to the untreated control.Similarly, the proportion of parasitized host larvae (reproductive mortality) significantly differed among treatments (H = 41.050;df = 5; p < 0.001).The highest reduction in parasitized T. absoluta larvae occurred when N. tutae was exposed to spinosad (11.50-fold) and garlic EO (4.93-fold) (Table 1).The proportion of N. tutae eggs developed into adults (parasitoid juvenile survival) was also significantly affected by the treatment (H = 23.400;df = 5; p < 0.001) (Table 1).In particular, chlorantraniliprole and garlic EO reduced N. tutae juvenile survival by almost half, while spinosad treatment resulted in no survival of the parasitoid offspring (Table 1).
Table 1.Results (mean % ± SE) of the assessment of the insecticide impact on the host-parasitoid interactions after 72 h of residual contact exposure to treated tomato leaves.Reproductive mortality shows the proportion of parasitized hosts (T.absoluta larvae) with N. tutae eggs in the mines over the total number of exposed hosts.Non-reproductive mortality identifies the proportion of hosts who died of host-feeding and host-killing by N. tutae over the total number of exposed hosts.Parasitoid juvenile survival shows the proportion of N. tutae adults successfully emerged over the total number of parasitized T. absoluta larvae (reproductive mortality).Within each column, different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney pairwise post-hoc test, p ≤ 0.05).

Ganaspis kimorum Survival after Residual Contact Exposure to Insecticides
No significant differences among treatments were found for the survival rates of G. kimorum males and females after insecticide residual contact exposure (log-rank test: males: χ 2 = 2.990, df = 5, p = 0.702; females: χ 2 = 5.980, df = 5, p = 0.308).The lowest LT 50 values for G. kimorum females after insecticide exposure were observed for cyantraniliprole (16.5 ± 2.4 days) and garlic EO (16.9 ± 1.9 days) treatments, while the highest mean survival of parasitoid females was observed for the control group (23.6 ± 1.8 days) (Figure 4A).The estimated LT 50 values of parasitoid males ranged from 13.8 ± 1.6 days after residual exposure to B. bassiana to 17.6 ± 1.5 days after residual exposure to the garlic EO residue, while it was 15.5 ± 1.40 days for parasitoid males from the control group (Figure 4B).

Necremnus tutae Survival after Residual Contact Exposure to Insecticides
The survival analysis of N. tutae females after residual contact exposure to insecticides revealed significant differences between treatments (log-rank test: χ 2 = 14.005, df = 4, p = 0.007), with only garlic EO significantly reducing the parasitoid's mean survival time (8.3 ± 1.2 days) compared to that of the control (14.7 ± 1.0 days) (Holm comparison method: p = 0.024) (Figure 5A).The mean LT 50 values for N. tutae adult females exposed to the other treatments were not significantly different from the control, ranging from 11.8 ± 1.5 days to 13.2 ± 1.4 days and 14.1 ± 1.3 days, for chlorantraniliprole, B. thuringiensis, and B. bassiana, respectively.No significant difference was found in the survival rates of N. tutae males exposed to different insecticides (log-rank test: χ 2 = 2.302, df = 4, p = 0.680).However, mean LT 50 values ranged from 9 to 11 days for all treatments except for garlic EO, which showed the lowest LT 50 (7.36± 1.53 days) (Figure 5B).

Necremnus tutae Survival after Residual Contact Exposure to Insecticides
The survival analysis of N. tutae females after residual contact exposure to insecticides revealed significant differences between treatments (log-rank test: χ 2 = 14.005, df = 4, p = 0.007), with only garlic EO significantly reducing the parasitoid's mean survival time (8.3 ± 1.2 days) compared to that of the control (14.7 ± 1.0 days) (Holm comparison method: p = 0.024) (Figure 5A).The mean LT50 values for N. tutae adult females exposed to the other treatments were not significantly different from the control, ranging from 11.8 ± 1.5 days to 13.2 ± 1.4 days and 14.1 ± 1.3 days, for chlorantraniliprole, B. thuringiensis, and B. bassiana, respectively.No significant difference was found in the survival rates of N. tutae males exposed to different insecticides (log-rank test: χ 2 = 2.302, df = 4, p = 0.680).However, mean LT50 values ranged from 9 to 11 days for all treatments except for garlic EO, which showed the lowest LT50 (7.36 ± 1.53 days) (Figure 5B).

Individual and Combined Insecticide-Necremnus tutae Impact on Pest Mortality
Necremnus tutae alone killed 83.1 ± 3.0% of T. absoluta larvae and significantly increased host mortality in combination with tested insecticides (H = 108.92;df = 10; p < 0.001).In particular, N. tutae increased the pest mortality by 14.1 times, when compared to the mortality caused by B. bassiana alone (U = 225; df = 28; p < 0.001).Chlorantraniliprole and B. thuringiensis alone caused similar mortalities (51.5 ± 3.4 and 61.8 ± 2.8%, respectively), but in combination with the parasitoid, the pest mortalities (88.2 ± 2.7 and 87.5 ± 3.0%, respectively) significantly increased by 1.7 (U = 218; df = 28; p < 0.001) and 1.4 (U = 202; df = 28; p < 0.001) times, respectively.Host mortality caused by garlic EO alone was 83.1 ± 3.9%, which significantly increased up to 94.9 ± 1.8% in combination with N. tutae Figure 6.Individual and combined impacts of Ganaspis kimorum and insecticides on Drosophila suzukii mortality.Data were corrected by means of Abbott's formula using corresponding control mortalities.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, at p ≤ 0.05.Within each treatment, the impact of the insecticide on D. suzukii mortality was statistically similar to that caused by its combination with G. kimorum (Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤

Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the impact of four bioinsecticides compared to a synthetic one on two invasive pests, D. suzukii and T. absoluta, and their major larval parasitoids, G. kimorum and N. tutae, respectively.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the non-target impact and compatibility of B. thuringiensis, B. bassiana, and garlic EO with both parasitoid species.Moreover, we provide the first data on the lethal and sublethal effects of spinosad and chlorantraniliprole on N. tutae.In the current study, the effect of the parasitoids on host mortality results from the survival rate of adult wasps

Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the impact of four bioinsecticides compared to a synthetic one on two invasive pests, D. suzukii and T. absoluta, and their major larval parasitoids, G. kimorum and N. tutae, respectively.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the non-target impact and compatibility of B. thuringiensis, B. bassiana, and garlic EO with both parasitoid species.Moreover, we provide the first data on the lethal and sublethal effects of spinosad and chlorantraniliprole on N. tutae.In the current study, the effect of the parasitoids on host mortality results from the survival rate of adult wasps within the 72 h contact exposure to insecticide residues and the sublethal effects of this exposure on their reproductive behaviors.In addition, parasitoid performance will be also affected by the availability of host larvae following insecticide treatment.In the longer term, the survival of juvenile parasitoids will also have an impact on natural enemy populations.Overall, our results revealed different compatibilities of the tested insecticides with both parasitoids in terms of the non-target effects on the parasitoids and their combined effects on host mortality.
Insecticides alone significantly reduced D. suzukii larvae survival.We found that the combinations of tested insecticides with G. kimorum increased the overall host mortalities by 3.4% to 19.9%, but this result was not statistically significant.The parasitoid contributed more to D. suzukii mortality in combination with the insecticides (both tested microbials and the garlic EO) that had no or the least toxicity to adult wasps during the 72 h of residual exposure.The low contribution by G. kimorum may be due to the low parasitism (24.4%) even on untreated blueberries.In contrast, N. tutae significantly increased the total host mortality in combination with most of the tested insecticides, except for spinosad, which killed all adult wasps after 48 h of exposure.
Necremnus tutae was very effective on T. absoluta, parasitizing and/or killing a high proportion of host larvae on untreated host leaves, causing approximately 82% of pest mortality.The parasitoid killed more hosts by host-feeding or host-killing activity than parasitism when it was tested alone (control group) (Table 1).These results corroborate those reported in previous studies on N. tutae behavioral shift and life history traits and also indicated a higher proportion of killed (non-reproductive effects) than parasitized (reproductive effects) T. absoluta host larvae [47,55,56].
The two entomopathogens (B.bassiana and B. thuringiensis) can be considered safe and compatible with both G. kimorum and N. tutae due to their lack of non-target effects and higher host mortality observed in all microbial-parasitoid combinations compared to the scenario in which they are used alone.Indeed, N. tutae combined with B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis increased T. absoluta mortality by 75.1% and 25.7% (Figure 7), respectively, while G. kimorum increased D. suzukii mortality by 19.9% and 14.6%, respectively, although not significantly (Figure 6).Indeed, both B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis are characterized by poor or low penetration rates into fruits and may have no or minimal toxicity toward immature D. suzukii [57] and developing parasitoid offspring in the host larvae.Indeed, this study showed no effects of the two microbials on the offspring survival of G. kimorum (Figure 3).However, B. thuringiensis was found to impair the fly larval endoparasitoid Leptopilina spp.(Hymenoptera: Figitidae) developing in contaminated Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilidae) larvae, which typically breed on rotten fruits that could be susceptible to insecticide spray drifts [58].This situation would be unlikely to occur for G. kimorum because it parasitizes only D. suzukii larvae developing within fresh fruits on the plant canopy [51].Because B. bassiana exhibits endophytic and epiphytic activity against T. absoluta in tomato crops [59] and B. thuringiensis targets moth larvae, non-target effects would be expected on the survival of immature parasitoids indirectly through affected host larvae.However, no harmful effect of both microbials was found on N. tutae juvenile survival in this study (Table 1).
The selectivity of the two microbial insecticides strongly depends on their main mechanisms of action.Indeed, B. bassiana infects insects percutaneously and conidia germination is typically completed around 20 h after contact.This process is strongly influenced by insect cuticular lipids, which possess antimicrobial properties affecting the attachment of the spores to the cuticle and their germination and penetration into the insect body, where the fungus will also need to overcome the host immune defenses [60].Therefore, B. bassiana was reported to have a minimal or absent impact on non-target organisms [61], especially on adult parasitoids [60].In addition, the host-specificity of B. bassiana is a strain-specific trait, and insects that are infected in the laboratory may not necessarily be infected in nature or under field conditions [60].The effect of B. thuringiensis on natural enemies has been proven to be minimal because of the inadequate midgut environment for successful intoxication [62].In support of these considerations, different studies showed that the integration of B. thuringiensis with Trichogramma spp.egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) significantly decreased T. absoluta infestations in field conditions [63,64].
Garlic EO was safe for G. kimorum but caused sublethal toxicity to N. tutae.Garlic EO is a promising botanical compound against both T. absoluta and D. suzukii [29,65].The current study showed the compatibility of garlic EO with G. kimorum for the first time, as well as the sublethal toxicity of N. tutae.This botanical insecticide impaired adult N. tutae reproductive and non-reproductive behaviors, as well as the survival of immature (Table 1) and adult female wasps following residual exposure (Figure 5).Similarly, Passos et al. [39] and Ricupero et al. [29] found that garlic EO inhibited the behavior and fertility of a key predator of T. absoluta, i.e., Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae).However, more studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the impact of garlic EO on parasitoids.Giunti et al. [35] recently reviewed the non-target impact of essential oil-based biopesticides on natural enemies and showed that their toxicity assessment needs multiple factors including the plant origin, application methods, host and parasitoid species, and stages, as they can affect the results of toxicity assessment of oil-based biopesticides.
In contrast to B. bassiana and B. thuringiensis (which are commonly used) and garlic EO (which is under evaluation for use in the tomato and soft-skinned fruit agroecosystems against other pests), cyantraniliprole and chlorantraniliprole are commonly used synthetic insecticides for the conventional management of D. suzukii and T. absoluta, respectively [6,10].Therefore, the impacts of these two synthetic insecticides on G. kimorum and N. tutae would be highly expected in the field.Cyantraniliprole affected D. suzukii larvae in the fruit [66][67][68] and the key physiological traits of D. suzukii larvae at sublethal doses in the rearing diet [28].It is, thus, very effective for the control of D. suzukii but has been considered a low-risk insecticide for non-target species [69].The current study also showed that cyantraniliprole was effective (alone killed 62.7% of D. suzukii larvae) and had no effect on G. kimorum.Our complementary study indicated that cyantraniliprole LC 50 on G. kimorum was higher than the recommended field dose against D. suzukii and that this synthetic insecticide did not impair the parasitoid survival [70].
Chlorantraniliprole was widely reported to be highly effective against T. absoluta larvae [6].The 51.8% of host mortality found in the current study using the recommended label rate could be related to the widespread resistance of this pest to chlorantraniliprole across the Mediterranean region [6], including Italy where the pest colony used in this study was initiated.Although chlorantraniliprole is generally considered harmless to natural enemies [71,72], several studies also showed negative effects on the parasitoid's reproduction and offspring emergence [73].In this study, chlorantraniliprole was also found to moderately impair the reproductive and non-reproductive behavioral traits of N. tutae, as well as its offspring survival (Table 1).Although the combination of chlorantraniliprole with N. tutae determined a significantly higher host mortality (88.2%) than the insecticide alone (Figure 7), it is not recommended for the combination use of this insecticide with the parasitoid.Still, chlorantraniliprole can be used as part of IPM approaches as this insecticide could also target other key pests in a given crop.
Lastly, spinosad was the most effective insecticide against T. absoluta and D. suzukii but also had the most detrimental effect on N. tutae and G. kimorum.As a consequence, both parasitoids contributed least to their host mortality (4.4% and 2.9%, respectively) in combination with spinosad.Spinosad can be absorbed into the fruit tissues through the oviposition holes made by flies [74].The mortality of immature D. suzukii ranged from 80-90% under laboratory bioassays (e.g., fruit dipping in insecticide solution) [67,68] and field spray applications [66,75].This study showed that spinosad alone killed 86.4% of D. suzukii in the fruits (Figure 6).Spinosad is one of the main tools for the conventional and organic management of T. absoluta due to its high effectiveness in killing larvae in the leaf mines [6,38].It alone killed 95.6% of T. absoluta larvae in the present study (Figure 7).
Spinosad has been classified as moderately harmful or harmful (IOBC classes 3 and 4, respectively) to hymenopteran parasitoids, and thus is questionable regarding its potential compatibility with key biological control agents [34].High acute toxicity of spinosad at label field rates was reported on more than 20 parasitoid species more than a decade ago [34].Not surprisingly, spinosad was found to impair the survival of juvenile and adult G. kimorum in this study (Figures 1 and 3).Even doses more than 10,000 times lower than the label rate against D. suzukii were found to affect this parasitoid's life-history traits [70].Thus, spinosad should not be considered compatible with G. kimorum, as it is with other key D. suzukii parasitoids, such as Pachycrepoideus vindemiae (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), Trichopria drosophilae (Perkins), and T. anastrephae Lima (Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) [28,36,76].Spinosad was extremely toxic to N. tutae, resulting in 100% adult mortality after 48 h of exposure to treated leaves, and significantly impaired the parasitoid's reproductive ability and no offspring could survive (Table 1).Other studies also showed that spinosad impaired the effectiveness of T. absoluta parasitoids [77,78], particularly that of the larval ectoparasitoid Bracon nigricans Szépligeti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), which is among the major natural enemies of T. absoluta in the Mediterranean area [37,79], together with N. tutae [48].However, some studies suggested that parasitoid releases combined with this bioinsecticide have the potential to control T. absoluta infestations in tomato crops in the fields [38,80].Further studies are needed to confirm the impact of this insecticide, as well as of the other tested bioinsecticides, on N. tutae under field conditions.

Conclusions
Ganaspis kimorum did not significantly increase host mortality in combination with tested insecticides and this was likely due to the low parasitism under the current experimental setting, while N. tutae significantly showed an additive effect on host mortality.The two tested entomopathogens can be considered compatible with both parasitoids, and in particular, B. thuringiensis is the most promising biocontrol agent for use in combination with N. tutae due to its importance for the organic management of T. absoluta.Garlic EO is a promising insecticide for controlling both pests, but its use is recommended mainly with G. kimorum because of its non-target effect on N. tutae, as also observed for chlorantraniliprole.Moreover, cyantraniliprole is currently one of the main options for the conventional management of D. suzukii, and our results suggest its suitability for integration with G. kimorum because it did not affect the parasitoid's fitness but provided successful control of D. suzukii larvae in the fruits.Although spinosad is a mainstay of the conventional and organic management of both D. suzukii and T. absoluta, the origin of a given compound does not guarantee its safety and its combination with G. kimorum and N. tutae should be avoided due to the impactful non-target toxicity on both parasitoids.These results provide practical insights into biological control-centered IPM packages targeting these two major invasive pests worldwide.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Cumulative mortality (Mean % ± SE) of Ganaspis kimorum adults evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to each tested insecticide.Different lower-case letters, capital letters, and lower-case italic letters indicate significant differences among insecticides after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences among the three exposure durations (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Insecticide effects on the apparent parasitism of Ganaspis kimorum females parasitizing Drosophila suzukii larvae in a treated blueberry during 72 h of residual contact exposure.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2.Cumulative mortality (Mean % ± SE) of Necremnus tutae adults evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure to each tested insecticide.Different lower-case letters, capital letters, and lower-case italic letters indicate significant differences among insecticides after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences among the three exposure durations (Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni-corrected p-values, p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Insecticide effects on the apparent parasitism of Ganaspis kimorum females parasitizing Drosophila suzukii larvae in a treated blueberry during 72 h of residual contact exposure.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Insecticide effects on the apparent parasitism of Ganaspis kimorum females parasitizing Drosophila suzukii larvae in a treated blueberry during 72 h of residual contact exposure.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, at p ≤ 0.05.

Insects 2024, 15 , x 10 of 19 Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Survival curves of Ganaspis kimorum female (A) and male (B) adults following 72 h of residual contact exposure to different insecticides.The curves were generated through Kaplan-Meier estimators and no significant differences (p < 0.05) were obtained when compared in the log-rank test (p < 0.05).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Survival curves of Ganaspis kimorum female (A) and male (B) adults following 72 h of residual contact exposure to different insecticides.The curves were generated through Kaplan-Meier estimators and no significant differences (p < 0.05) were obtained when compared in the log-rank test (p < 0.05).

Insects 2024, 15 , x 11 of 19 Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Survival curves of Necremnus tutae female (A) and male (B) adults following 72 h of residual contact exposure to different insecticides.The curves were generated through Kaplan-Meier estimators and compared in the log-rank test (p < 0.05).Treatment names with letters identify significantly different curves.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Survival curves of Necremnus tutae female (A) and male (B) adults following 72 h of residual contact exposure to different insecticides.The curves were generated through Kaplan-Meier estimators and compared in the log-rank test (p < 0.05).Treatment names with letters identify significantly different curves.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Individual and combined impacts of Ganaspis kimorum and insecticides on Drosophila suzukii mortality.Data were corrected by means of Abbott's formula using corresponding control mortalities.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, at p ≤ 0.05.Within each treatment, the impact of the insecticide on D. suzukii mortality was statistically similar to that caused by its combination with G. kimorum (Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤ 0.05).Insects 2024, 15, x 13 of 19

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Individual and combined impact of Necremnus tutae and insecticides on Tuta absoluta mortality.Data were corrected by means of Abbott's formula using corresponding control mortalities.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons at p ≤ 0.05.Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences in T. absoluta mortality between the insecticide alone and its combination with N. tutae according to the Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Individual and combined impact of Necremnus tutae and insecticides on Tuta absoluta mortality.Data were corrected by means of Abbott's formula using corresponding control mortalities.Means (±SE) with different letters are significantly different according to Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons at p ≤ 0.05.Within each treatment, asterisks show significant differences in T. absoluta mortality between the insecticide alone and its combination with N. tutae according to the Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤ 0.05.