A Review of the Host Plant Location and Recognition Mechanisms of Asian Longhorn Beetle

Simple Summary The Asian longhorned beetle (ALB), Anoplophora glabripennis Motschulsky, is a destructive pest in its native habitat and one of the most serious invasive alien species in North America and Europe, causing substantial economic and ecological losses. In order to explore effective monitoring and management strategies, we summarize and create a comprehensive list of host plants, including 209 species (cultivars) that have been damaged by ALBs. Thus far, 143 olfactory protein genes have been found in ALBs. Host kairomones were preferentially bound to ALB recombinant odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), but the function of most OBPs is still unclear. Microbial communities may help ALBs degrade host plants. We analyzed the trapping effect of combined host kairomones and sex pheromones and found that trapping numbers are limited in the field. Therefore, we discussed host plant location behavioral processes from new perspectives and found that multiple cues are used to locate and recognize host plants. Overall, we suggest that further research should contribute to understanding the host resistance mechanism, microbial community influence mechanism, and visual cue recognition mechanism of host plants. This research may provide effective monitoring and management strategies for ALBs. Abstract The Asian longhorn beetle (ALB), Anoplophora glabripennis Motschulsky, is a polyphagous xylophage with dozens of reported host tree species. However, the mechanisms by which individuals locate and recognize host plants are still unknown. We summarize the current knowledge of the host plant list, host kairomones, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and microbial symbionts of this beetle and their practical applications, and finally discuss the host localization and recognition mechanisms. A total of 209 species (or cultivars) were reported as ALB host plants, including 101 species of higher sensitivity; host kairomones were preferentially bound to ALB recombinant OBPs, including cis-3-hexen-1-ol, δ-3-carene, nonanal, linalool, and β-caryophyllene. In addition, microbial symbionts may help ALB degrade their host. Complementarity of tree species with different levels of resistance may reduce damage, but trapping effectiveness for adults was limited using a combination of host kairomones and sex pheromones in the field. Therefore, we discuss host location behavior from a new perspective and show that multiple cues are used by ALB to locate and recognize host plants. Further research into host resistance mechanisms and visual signal recognition, and the interaction of sex pheromone synthesis, symbiont microbiota, and host plants may help reveal the host recognition mechanisms of ALBs.


Introduction
Urban landscape and ornamental tree species provide multiple services for city residents, including recreational and tourism opportunities for humans and habitats for diverse biotic communities, promoting biodiversity, climate regulation, and even timber and nontimber production [1]. Insects are the most common organisms in forests, and they play an based trap lures have not achieved operational efficacy in the detection and management of ALB to date (see Section 4.2). Therefore, the mechanism by which ALBs locate host plants requires further clarification from a new perspective.
The aims of this work are (1) to create a comprehensive list of host plants, thus providing a theoretical basis for further research on the interaction of ALBs and host plants, (2) to summarize the relationships between host kairomone types and odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and the interaction between host plants and microbial symbionts of ALBs, (3) to analyze the influence of ALB population density on mixed forests and the effects of host kairomones on the ability to trap this pest, and (4) to provide a new perspective on the behavior used by ALBs for locating host plants. This review will provide a valuable reference and context for understanding the interactions between this beetle and its host plants, as well as new strategies for ALB monitoring and management.

Host Plant Lists
We found that at least 209 species (or cultivars) from 41 genera, 21 families, and 10 orders have been reported as host plants of ALBs in Asia, North America, and Europe [6,17,18, (Tables S1 and S2). ALBs infest broad-leaved tree species mainly in the genera Populus, Acer, Salix, Ulmus, Aesculus, and Betula; approximately 75.12% of the host plant species belong to these six genera, including 41.15% of Populus species, 12.92% of Acer species, 9.56% of Salix species, 5.74% of Ulmus species, 2.87% of Aesculus species, and 2.87% of Betula species (Table S2). In particular, approximately 86 species or cultivars that belong to Populus are susceptible to damage, and 95.35% (82/86) of these Populus species have been recorded in China (Table S2). In China, Populus and Salix are the most commonly infested genera, while Acer is the most commonly infested tree genus in North America and Europe [5,6]. A total of 162, 36, and 26 tree species have been reported as hosts in China, North America, and Europe, respectively. Based on information about the development of adult ALBs on these plants, reported in the literature from 1992 to 2022, which is available in the Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), these tree species were classified into four types: I: High-sensitivity (HS) plant species are those on which the ALB has been reported to complete its life cycle (from oviposition to the emergence of new beetles); these plants were recorded as highly sensitive or very good host plants [21,23,34]. It has been reported that ALBs are able to complete their life cycle on 171 species of plants, including 101 species of highly sensitive host plants, and 70 species of moderate-sensitivity plants (Tables S1 and S2). II: Moderate-sensitivity (MS) plant species are those on which the ALB completes its life cycle but that have not been recorded as highly sensitive or very good host plants.
III: Partial-sensitivity (PS) plant species are those on which the ALB completes part of its life cycle, including feeding and oviposition, but for which exit holes have not been recorded. Tree species classified as PS and S are rarely reported, with 11 and 27 tree species, respectively. IV: Low-sensitivity (LS) plant species are those on which only feeding or oviposition of the ALB has been recorded (without exit holes) [26].
The results showed that 101, 70, 11, and 27 tree species belonged to these four categories, respectively. The host plant species differ significantly by region; for example, 78, 63, 5, and 17 species belonged to the HS, MS, PS and LS categories in China, respectively; 16,9,7, and 4 species were classified into the HS, MS, PS, and LS categories in North America, respectively; and 17, 4, 1, and 4 species were classified into the HS, MS, PS, and LS categories in Europe, respectively (Table S2).
(2) Different concentrations of chemical compounds have different trapping effects in adults; low concentrations (0.0004-0.004 mol/L) may not be attractive to adults, while high concentrations (0.04-2 mol/L) may be attractive; this has been observed for R-α-pinene, S-α-pinene, S-β-pinene, phellandrene, and other compounds [44]. Moreover, a single chemical compound may be an attractant for adults when combined with host odors, whereas when combined with nonhost volatiles, it may be a deterrent, such as β-caryophyllene [67].
(3) The same chemical compounds have different effects on female and male adults; for example, myrcene and 3-carene are not attractive to females at concentrations of 0.0004-2 mol/L but have a positive trapping effect on males when used at concentrations of 0.4 mol/L and 2 mol/L [44].

Odorant-Binding Proteins of ALB to Recognize Host Plants
OBPs play a vital role in the communication between insects and odorant molecules from host plants, conspecifics and environments and are widely used to perceive and carry odorant molecules to odorant receptors in the hydrophilic sensillum lymph [71]. A total of 61 OBP genes have been identified and classified into four types, including 10 AglaOBPs classified as classical OBPs; 29 AglaOBPs lacking C2 and C5, classified as minus-C OBPs; 15 AglaOBPs belonging to Antennae-binding proteins subfamily (ABP II); and 1 AglaOBPs classified as plus-C OBPs based on genome projects and transcriptomic data of ALBs [72]. The number of OBPs is greater than that reported for other species of Coleoptera, including the Cerambycidae M. alternatus Hope, Saperda populnea, M. saltuarius, and the other beetles, D. helophoroides, Dendroctonus ponderosae, and Ips typographus [73][74][75][76]. ALB is a polyphagous species, and its hosts comprise 209 broad-leaved plants (cultivars) ( Table S2). Plants differ in their chemical compounds, and diversified OBPs may contribute to the recognition of various food types using complex chemosensory systems. Twelve AglaOBP genes are expressed specifically in the antennae, including AglaOBP3, AglaOBP4, AglaOBP18, AglaOBP21, AglaOBP33, AglaOBP41, AglaOBP45, AglaOBP46, AglaOBP47, AglaOBP48, AglaOBP50, and AglaOBP53; in particular, AglaOBP3, AglaOBP18, AglaOBP21, AglaOBP33, AglaOBP41, AglaOBP45, and AglaOBP47 are highly expressed in male antennae, and may be used to recognize sex pheromones [72].
The fluorescent competitive binding assay plays an important role in detecting the binding efficacy of OBPs. This can show the conjunction ability of OBPs with the molecules of host kairomones. There is a significant difference in the conjunction ability of different OBPs with the same chemical molecule. Although a total of 61 OBP genes have been found in ALBs, research on the effective binding of OBPs involved only AglaOBP1, AglaOBP12, AglaOBP45, and AglaOBP46 (Tables 2 and S3) [77][78][79]. The results showed that multiple OBPs may be involved in the host location and recognition process. Moreover, the abovementioned four recombinant AglaOBPs show obvious preferential binding to volatiles from host plants of ALBs; for instance, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, δ-3-carene, nonanal, linalool, and β-caryophyllene have been found in the host plants sugar maple, striped maple, and horse chestnut [67].   Table 1 and Table S4.
The trapping effects on ALB of some semiochemical constituents that have higher binding affinities with AglaOBPs, for example, heptanal, and butyl caproate, have not been tested in the laboratory or field. These substances may improve the current situation in which the effect of trap lures is limited to adult ALBs (see Section 4.2) [79]. Therefore, the binding effectiveness of the other AglaOBPs with semiochemicals should be tested using a fluorescent competitive binding assay, and the experimental results may provide a new perspective for the integrated management of ALBs.

Collaboration with Microbes to Degrade Host Plant Tissue
Beneficial gut microbes enhance the fitness of most living organisms, particularly wood-feeding insects [82]. ALBs typically lay eggs along the upper trunk and main branches of a tree. Females usually chew a distinct funnel-shaped and T-shaped oviposition pit through the bark at the phloem-cambium interface, and then inject a single egg into the bark [5]. Larvae create a feeding gallery and oval-shaped tunnel in the phloem and xylem, and all the larval nutrition is derived from the phloem and xylem of the host plant. Glucose is a predominant wood sugar, but it is reserved on the complex polysaccharides in the phloem and xylem, including cellulose, hemicellulose, callose, and pectin, which are suboptimal substrates that are nutritionally deficient and inherently difficult to digest. Nitrogen, fatty acids, sterols, and vitamins are also extremely limited in woody tissues [83,84]. Therefore, it is extremely challenging to acquire sufficient nutrients to complete development when digesting these substances [85]. The midgut transcriptome indicated that ALBs can produce several enzymes associated with cell wall digestion, detoxification, and nutrient extraction, but few transcripts were identified and predicted to encode enzymes of lignin degradation or synthesis of essential nutrients, indicating that other enzymes may be provided by microorganisms in the gut to enable the survival of these larvae in woody tissue [85].
In addition, plant secondary metabolites, such as diterpenic acid, flavonoids, phenols, and alkaloids play an important role in insect resistance [51,86] and the contents and assemblages of these substances vary with plant species. In addition to enzymes produced by the digestive tract, beneficial microbes in the insect gut are associated with the degradation of plant insect-resistant substances [87]. A previous study showed that the contents of flavonoids, simple phenols, coumarin and its derivatives were higher in the xylem of Fraxinus chinensis than in that of F. pennsylvanica [51]. Moreover, when ALB fed on F. chinensis, the intestinal bacterial community of ALB involved in the metabolism of these substances, including Enterococcus and Raoultella, was significantly larger [51]. This suggests that these microbial symbionts in the gut of insects produce a number of enzymes to degrade these toxic substances, thereby improving fitness and expanding the host's ecological niche [88]. ALBs attack and kill healthy trees and have a wide range of host tree species (Table S2) [5]. Sophisticated abilities should have evolved in ALBs to evade host plant defenses and they should possess extensive suites of enzymes involved in digestive proteinase inhibition, detoxification of plant metabolites, and disruption of jasmonic acid signaling pathways [89]. Therefore, to understand the expansion of the ecological niche of ALBs, the important role of microbial symbionts in these metabolic processes and how they lead to the evolutionary success of ALBs with a variety of host plants need to be further researched.

Mixed Forest
Push-pull strategies, in which the behaviors of insect pests and their natural enemies are manipulated using special stimuli, are a useful tool for IPM programs aiming to reduce the use of pesticides [60]. One means of manipulation is to repel pests away from protected crop plants by using plants that are unattractive or unsuitable for the pests. The host plant list of insect pests is a key factor in this strategy. Therefore, an explicit host plant species list provides a strategy for managing the ALB population. In 1999, an ecological management model for the cooperative planting of tree species with different resistance levels was used to manage the population density of ALBs in China [90]. This management method had two main components, including removing pest-infected tree trunk sections and grafting pest-resistant tree species onto the residual root of the infected tree species. Thus, a protection zone was built using ALB-resistant and ALB-tolerant tree species to prevent the diffusion of ALBs, and the percentage of damaged trees was reduced from 98.7% in 1976 to 3.8% in 1999. As a result, the output value of the woodland increased sevenfold.
Bottom-up effects could be mediated by first-trophic-level variables, impacting the survival, development, behavior, and population dynamics of insect pests and crop yield. The use of first-trophic-level variables-that is, a proper configuration of resistant and sensitive plant species-triggered changes in crop diversity, insect pest habitat, fertilization, volatile compounds and other factors, notably influencing pest populations and potentially enhancing pest control [61]. A clarified list of host plants can also be used to select appropriate tree species in mixed forests to decrease the damage caused by ALBs. An investigation showed that the ALB-induced damage rate decreased with an increase in ALB-resistant tree species in a mixed forest, probably because the phenological phase changes in ALB-resistant tree species relative to those of ALB-sensitive trees complicate the background of chemical cues [91]. Moreover, adult ALB mating frequency and landing frequency on host plants decreased in mixed forests composed of Ailanthus altissima and P. bolleana [92].
Although the combination of host volatiles and sex pheromones has been found to attract more ALB adults than the control, the number of traps applied in the field is still limited ( Table 3). The response ratio of adults was approximately 40-90% of the total mean trap catches per week in traps including sex pheromones and/or host kairomones identified using a Y-tube olfactometer in the laboratory; moreover, the mean trap catches per week was approximately 40% of total test insect samples in four traps in a greenhouse [68]. Relative to that in the laboratory and greenhouse, the trapping effect was significantly decreased when male-and female-produced pheromones and/or volatile compounds from host plants were used in the field (Table 3). For example, 42 beetles were trapped by 90 flight intercept panel traps from 23 July to 19 August in Harbin, China [99]. In addition, the recapture rate of adults was 5.14% of the total number of released adults according to the "mark-release-recapture" technique when male-produced pheromones in the 200 m range were used in the field in Hengshui, Hebei Province, China [42]. However, approximately 120 beetles were caught every 3 h by three researchers over a one-week period in high-density populations in Baoding, Shijiazhuang, Cangzhou, and Hengshui, Hebei Province, China. The manual capture of ALBs in the field corresponds with the population size derived from the "mark-release-recapture" technique. Therefore, a highly attractive trapping device for ALBs with an effective trapping lure, shape and color is urgently needed.
In previous studies, limited trapping may have been affected by many factors, such as the test site, the shape and color of the trap, and the composition of the lure.
(1) Due to experimental site selection, the mean number of ALB adults caught may be very low in the same traps. The population density of ALB larvae and pupae varied by location and tree species [103]; for example, the density in Jilin Province was higher than that in Gansu, Shaanxi, Hebei and Beijing [14]. We also found that adult population size exhibited a significantly skewed distribution in the field investigation. The number of captured individuals was higher in the high-density population than in the low-density population in Hebei, China. Therefore, the test site should also be considered in field experiments.
(2) There was a significant difference in the mean trap catch per lure between different types of traps, particularly among traps differing in shape and color. Intercept panel traps caught more adults per week than the other traps, including hand-made screen sleeve traps, Plum curculio traps and Lindgren funnel traps, in greenhouses when baited with male-produced sex pheromone blends and (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, whereas screen sleeve traps were most attractive when baited with (-)-linalool [68]. In addition, the average number of beetles captured by brown traps was significantly higher than that captured by noncolormodified traps when the content of 2-pentanol was increased, but the catch capacities still did not significantly increase [102].
(3) The composition of the lure is also a key factor in trapping ALBs. Although approximately 13 kinds of attractive host plant volatiles and 20 kinds of sex pheromones have been found in recent years [80,81,95,96,98,104,105] (Tables 2 and S4), there is no sufficiently strong attractive chemical available for practical application in the field, similar to observations for other cerambycid species, especially early in the invasion process [105]. For example, long-range female-produced sex pheromones were more significantly attractive to adult ALBs than combinations of host kairomones and linalool oxide [98], but trapping capacities remained limited (Table 3). Therefore, it is necessary to further discuss the host plant location and recognition behavior of ALBs, and this process may be more complicated than previously speculated.

Host Plant Location and Recognition Behavior Hypothesis
Although considerable achievements have been made in chemical ecology research, the host location and recognition mechanisms of ALBs are still unclear. During host location in parasitoids, the host search process is divided into four steps: host habitat location, host location, host acceptance, and host suitability [106]. We suggest that host plant location and recognition in ALBs are also stepwise processes, similar to the process followed by parasitoids. First, adult females and males must identify plant profiles and colors over long distances; then, they must distinguish leaf color and olfactory cues and identify branch bark color and odors at close range. Adults collect bark chemical cues with their legs and deliver bark chemicals from their legs to their antennae and/or taste the bark after they have landed on the tree. Finally, adults decide whether to feed or lay eggs on the plant based on their nutrition after the "try to taste" process ( Figure 1). We suggest that host plant location and recognition in the ALB are incremental and that not only odor cues but multiple types, such as visual, olfactory, gustatory, and even tactile cues, are used. branch bark color and odors at close range. Adults collect bark chemical cues with their legs and deliver bark chemicals from their legs to their antennae and/or taste the bark after they have landed on the tree. Finally, adults decide whether to feed or lay eggs on the plant based on their nutrition after the "try to taste" process ( Figure 1). We suggest that host plant location and recognition in the ALB are incremental and that not only odor cues but multiple types, such as visual, olfactory, gustatory, and even tactile cues, are used. (1) Host plant habitat location: First, adults randomly move or fly to a host plant over a long distance. Subsequently, the outline and color of the plant may be considered important recognition cues when the adult is relatively far away from the plant. In the field, we found that adults could rapidly travel to plants instead of into a lake when host plants were grown near the lake, and adults could fly directly over a road and land on a plant on the other side of the road when host plants were planted on both sides of the road. These observations confirmed that the outline and color of plants play an important role in host plant location over long distances. Li [107] also suggested that the greenness of plants plays an important role in host plant location over long distances. In fact, the influence of the environment on the dispersal of volatiles should be considered, and host recognition by insects via olfactory cues is disrupted by complex volatile backgrounds [108]. (1) Host plant habitat location: First, adults randomly move or fly to a host plant over a long distance. Subsequently, the outline and color of the plant may be considered important recognition cues when the adult is relatively far away from the plant. In the field, we found that adults could rapidly travel to plants instead of into a lake when host plants were grown near the lake, and adults could fly directly over a road and land on a plant on the other side of the road when host plants were planted on both sides of the road. These observations confirmed that the outline and color of plants play an important role in host plant location over long distances. Li [107] also suggested that the greenness of plants plays an important role in host plant location over long distances. In fact, the influence of the environment on the dispersal of volatiles should be considered, and host recognition by insects via olfactory cues is disrupted by complex volatile backgrounds [108]. This phenomenon is often suggested as the reason why visual cues from host plants are more effective than olfactory cues over long distances. Therefore, visual cues may play a more important role than olfactory cues in the process of locating host plants.
(2) Host plant recognition: The host plant habitat, comprising a mixture of host and nonhost plants, is confirmed by adults, but how they differentiate optimal host plants for growth and development from nonhost plants has not yet been clarified. We suggest that ALB first uses a combination of visual and olfactory signals from branches with leaves to locate host plants within an 80 cm range [109]; then, ALB uses combined color and odor cues from branch bark to locate and recognize the host plant [20]. There was no significant difference in the first orientation of adults when comparing visual or olfactory cues from A. negundo and Pinus bungeana branches with leaves; however, there was a significant difference between host and nonhost plants when a combination of visual and olfactory cues was provided for adults in the 80 cm range [109]. This result suggested that the effective attractive range of combined visual and olfactory cues is greater than that of single visual or olfactory cues for adults.
(3) Host plant acceptance: We speculate that a combination of bark color and olfactory cues is used to probe and evaluate the fitness of host plants contacted by adults; afterward, the thoracic legs may receive host bark chemical cues and deliver bark chemicals to antennae and/or taste the bark via gustatory receptors in the palps that contact the substrate [20]. Moreover, we found that the start time of grooming between the antennae and pro-or mesothoracic tarsi lags behind that of the first visit to a host plant, so we suggest that the thoracic legs also receive and transfer chemical cues to antennae or the brain to recognize host plants based on the chemical material collected on the feet [110].
(4) Host plant suitability: We suggested that the physicochemical properties of the host bark and the composition of host secondary metabolites were the key factors determining whether adult ALBs would feed on selected plants after the "try to taste" process using the gustatory sensory system in the final step. In previous research, we found that individual male and female beetles fed on cut branches of A. altissima, and the feeding areas of this species were very small: approximately 0.03-0.04 cm 2 per 12 h, on the branch bark of A. negundo and A. altissima without leaves. However, A. altissima is a resistant species according to the results of Cao et al. [111]. Therefore, we suggest that the "try to taste" process is also a crucial part of host plant recognition.

Further Research Directions on Interaction of ALBs and Host Plants
ALB is a high-risk species in its native and nonnative ranges and seriously endangers the economic and ecological value of forests in North America, Europe, and China [3,5]. ALB have been reported to be capable of attacking 209 species (or cultivars) from different families and exhibit exceptional host adaptability. Among the biochemical defenses, plant secondary metabolites are the most diverse and effective weapons to defend against pest and pathogen damage [112,113]. Phenolic glycosides and flavonoids are important plant secondary metabolites that suppress the foraging and oviposition of pests and strongly influence the growth, development, and behavior of insect herbivores [114][115][116]. However, generalist insects can overcome the effects of phenolic glycosides, even in particular insect species that use phenolic glycosides as feeding and oviposition stimulants [117], such as Galerucella lineola, Lochmaea capreae, Megaselia opacicornis, and Nematus oligospilus [118][119][120]. Furthermore, horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is widely recognized for prokaryotes and eukaryotes and can lead to the exploitation of new resources and niches [121][122][123][124][125][126]. The whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), is extremely polyphagous, with more than 600 reported host plant species [127]; the species has been shown to hijack a plant detoxification gene, BtPMaT1, which enables whiteflies to neutralize phenolic glucosides [114]. ALB is also extremely polyphagous; nevertheless, how this beetle neutralizes plant toxins and host resistance mechanisms remains unknown.
Trapping lures play a crucial role in surveys and management programs for insect pests [94]. To quickly detect the population dynamics of ALB and reduce damage, a highefficiency trapping device and a sustainable management strategy for ALB are urgently needed. At present, semiochemical attractants, including mainly sex pheromones and host kairomones, are used to detect the population dynamics of Cerambycidae [128][129][130][131][132], but the attractant effects on some species are limited. In addition, traps combining femaleproduced aldehydes and host kairomones captured more ALBs than control traps, but the mean trap catches were only 0.7-7 per trap per week [98]. Therefore, some key sex pheromones require identification.
There is a great deal of research indicating that microbial symbionts can directly modulate their host's biosynthesis of pheromones and other chemical components or provisioning of precursors, thus mediating mate choice decisions and some social behavior [133]. Some actions of bacterial manipulators of insect reproduction were observed, such as parthenogenesis, male killing, feminization and cytoplasmic incompatibility, to promote their own spread within a host population, including Wolbachia, Spiroplasma, Cardinium, Rickettsia, and some Bacteroidetes [134]. In the saw-toothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis, the Bacteroidetes symbiont supports cuticle synthesis to influence its cuticular hydrocarbon profile, and hence may modulate the release of sex pheromones [133,135]. After feeding on P. alba var. pyramidalis and S. babylonica, Wolbachia was the predominant bacteria in the gut of larvae, while Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria were predominant in larvae fed on a preferred host (A. saccharum) [136,137]. However, whether Wolbachia and Bacteroidetes influence the synthesis of cuticular hydrocarbons and mating of ALB has yet to be demonstrated. Further research focusing on the interaction of sex pheromone synthesis and symbiont microbiota may contribute to the development of trapping lures.
A total of 143 olfactory-related protein genes, including 61 OBPs, 12 chemosensory proteins (CSPs), 37 odorant receptors (ORs), 4 ionotropic receptors (IRs), 11 gustatory receptors (GRs), 1 odorant-degrading enzyme (ODE), 3 sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs), and 14 pheromone-degrading enzymes (PDEs), were identified by antennal transcriptome analysis [79,138]. This is fewer than the 151 genes in A. chinensis and 166 genes in Semanotus bifasciatus, but greater than the number of chemosensory receptor genes in the other cerambycids [75,76,139,140]. However, the functions of these sensory proteins are still unclear. Fluorescence competitive binding experiments can reveal the specific molecules with which OBPs bind. The results of previous studies suggested that AglaOBP45 can significantly bind with contact and trail pheromones of females (Table 3), but the binding capacity with sex pheromones from males was not reported in previous studies. AglaOBP47, AglaOBP48, and AglaOBP53 were particularly highly expressed in female antennae, and these OBPs may play an important role in the recognition of host plant kairomones, male-produced sex pheromones, mates, and/or suitable oviposition sites by females [72]. Thus, some OBPs that bind to sex pheromones need to be further explored, and the results will likely provide an appropriate lure for trapping ALB in the field.
Color vision is widespread among insects, but species differ in their spectral sensitivities [54]. Cavaletto et al. [141,142] suggested that trap color is also a key visual cue that can strongly increase the attractiveness of baited traps to longhorn beetles. Monitoring programs should not rely exclusively on black traps, and other trap colors can likely strongly improve the chance of trapping native and exotic longhorn beetles [141]. Our study also showed that the combination of bark color and odor cues of branches was used to locate host plants, and forest green paperboard enhanced the attractiveness of host branch volatiles in the laboratory [20]. This result suggested that color is a potential influencing factor in trapping effectiveness. Moreover, flight intercept traps with chemical attractant baits and/or special wavelengths of light are used to survey target native and nonnative forest insects, improving the trapping effect [2,143]. However, there was no significant improvement in the trapping effect when using brown intercept panel traps baited with 1-or 2-pentanol, and the average capture frequency was 1.521 beetles per trap per week [102]. Therefore, whether the capture capacity of semiochemicals (sex pheromones and host kairomones) for ALB adults can be enhanced by green or even other colors needs to be further researched in the field.
Light traps play an important role in pest management and are used extensively in IPM [54,143]. Many pests, especially nocturnal and pollinating insects, exhibit positive phototaxis toward artificial lights in agricultural areas, forests, greenhouses, and granaries at night [143]. For example, two major tea pests, Ectropis obliqua and Empoasca onukii, have strong sensitivity to 385 and 420 nm wavelength light, and their dominant natural insect enemies prefer a wavelength of 380 nm, so light traps with a combination of 385 and 420 nm wavelengths emitted with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been used to control tea insect pests. Indeed, LED light traps trapped more tea pests and fewer natural enemies than control traps fitted with a fluorescent lamp [144]. Cavaletto et al. [142] suggested that non-flower-visiting longhorn beetles were more attracted by dark and long wavelength-dominated colors, such as red and brown. Color is a characteristic that is determined by differing qualities of light being reflected or emitted. However, reports on the phototactic behavior of longhorn beetles are very rare. The maximum number of individuals captured was 12.5 beetles per trap per week when using only sex pheromones in an Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) trapping program, whereas the trapped number significantly increased when green LEDs were added to sex pheromones [145]. The phototactic behavior of agricultural pests has been well recognized, and traps equipped with specific light sources have made great contributions to IPM programs [143,146]. A previous study showed that the percentages of foraging and moving behavior of A. glabripennis at night were significantly higher than those during the day [147], suggesting that a light-trapping strategy may be used to monitor and manage the population density. Therefore, the phototactic behavior of longhorn beetles toward artificial light needs further investigation. Light traps baited with semiochemicals may improve the limited attractiveness of single chemical cues in the field.
In addition, insects usually have three visual opsin proteins (UV, SW, and LW), which form photopigments that are maximally sensitive to ultraviolet, blue, and green wavelengths [54,[148][149][150]. Molecular evidence suggests that opsins, which detect blue wavelengths, were lost approximately 300 million years ago in many beetle lineages, including those containing the ALB, diving beetles (Thermonectus marmoratus), and jewel beetles (Buprestidae) [151]. The opsin family is divided into visual and nonvisual opsin subfamilies [152]. We found that a bark-mimicking color (forest green, CMYK: 54,8,100,30) enhanced the response of adult insects to odor cues from the cut branches of host plants [20]. However, little is known about the opsin types in ALBs. Research on visual opsin types and pathways of visual signals may also provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of ALB trapping and management strategies.