Insecticidal Activity of a Component, (-)-4-Terpineol, Isolated from the Essential Oil of Artemisia lavandulaefolia DC. against Plutella xylostella (L.)

Simple Summary Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) is the most destructive pest of cruciferous crops around the world. The inappropriate use of insecticides to manage it has brought the development of resistance to several pesticide active ingredients. Keeping in view the resistance problem and long-term application, essential oils of plants may provide an environment-friendly solution to manage pests. Although the essential oil of Artemisia lavandulaefolia DC. was proven to exhibit promising insecticidal activities against P. xylostella, which components have insecticidal activities are unknown. In the present study, four bioactive components were identified from A. lavandulaefolia essential oil by GC/MS, and their insecticidal activities against P. xylostella were also evaluated. Among them, (-)-4-terpineol was proven to be mostly responsible for its insecticidal activity against P. xylostella. This effect was associated with decreased activity of GST, CAT, AChE and Na+/K+-ATPase. Overall, our findings indicated that (-)-4-terpineol may offer an alternative source for the control of P. xylostella. Abstract Plutella xylostella (L.) is one of the most serious pests of cruciferous vegetables. Our previous work demonstrated that the essential oil of Artemisia lavandulaefolia DC. exhibits promising insecticidal activities against P. xylostella. This study further characterizes the key components that are responsible for the insecticidal effect. In total, 47 compounds (96.52% of the total compounds) were identified from the total oil using GC-MS, and the major compounds were eucalyptol (21.57%), D(+)-camphor (17.33%), (-)-4-terpineol (9.96%) and caryophyllene oxide (10.96%). Among them, (-)-4-terpineol showed significantly larvicidal and fumigant activities against P. xylostella. The LD50 of (-)-4-terpineol was 43.15 mg/mL at 12 h and 31.22 mg/mL at 24 h for 3rd instar larvae, and the LC50 for adults was 8.34 mg/mL at 12 h and 7.35 mg/mL at 24 h. In addition, the adults treated with (-)-4-terpineol showed varying degrees of inhibitory activity toward glutathione S-transferase, catalase, acetylcholinesterase and Na+/K+-ATPase at different post-treatment intervals and concentrations. The results indicate that (-)-4-terpineol has promising insecticidal activities against P. xylostella, and it has good inhibitory effects on the four enzymes of P. xylostella adults.


Introduction
The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is the most destructive pest of cruciferous crops around the world, and its control in China costs annually approximately $0.77 billion [1,2]. The extensive use of insecticides to manage it has brought the development of resistance to several pesticide active ingredients [3][4][5]. Keeping in view the resistance problem and sustainability, essential oils of plants may provide an environment-friendly solution to manage pests. Essential oils are by-products of plant metabolism that are now known to interfere with basic metabolic, physiological and behavioral functions of insects [6], thereby having promising insecticidal prospects. The Tanacetum vulgare L., Tagetes patula L. and A. absinthium L. were reported to act as the AChE inhibitor and blocked the Na + /K + -ATPase of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) [39]. From the phenomenon of insect poisoning, the mode of action of essential oil compounds elicits characteristic neurotoxic symptoms including agitation, hyperactivity, paralysis and knockdown. Thus, the objective of our work was to assess the insecticidal activity of eucalyptol, D(+)-camphor, (-)-4-terpineol and caryophyllene oxide against larvae and adults of P. xylostella and also to determine the impact of the active essential oil compound (-)-4-terpineol on the GST, CAT, AChE and Na + /K + -ATPase enzyme activities of the diamondback moth.

Insects
Plutella xylostella was obtained from the experimental field of Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, and then was maintained in a screen cage (43 × 43 × 43 cm). Larvae were reared on Brassica oleracea var. capitata that had never been exposed to pesticides. Enclosed adults were fed on 10% honey water as a nutritional supplement. The setup was arranged in a plant growth chamber at 25 ± 1 • C, 65 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod of 16:8 (light:dark cycle).

Plant Materials and Essential Oil Extraction
The aerial parts of A. lavandulaefolia were previously identified and confirmed by Dr. Tong-Bao Qu (Voucher specimen: JLH 2158), College of Horticulture, Jilin Agricultural University. The aboveground parts, including stems, leaves and flowers, were collected at the end of August 2019 in Changchun (43.8170 • N, 125.3235 • E). The harvested parts were cut into pieces and then dried in the shade for 10 days. Each 1.5 kg of dried plant material was soaked with water for 12 h. Then, the samples were subjected to hydrodistillation for 2 h using plant essential oil extraction equipment (Shanghai Yuyan Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China). The obtained essential oil was stored in amber sealed glass bottles for refrigeration at 4 • C until use.

Identification of Compounds
The A. lavandulaefolia essential oil composition was analyzed by gas chromatography using a GC system (Agilent 6890N, Agilent Technologies Incorporated, Santa Clara, CA, USA). An HP-1 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness) was used with injection in split-ratio mode (40:1). The oven temperature started at 60 • C for 3 min, and then it was increased to 100 • C (10 • C/min). Afterward, it was increased to 180 • C (5 • C/min) and subsequently increased to 280 • C (15 • C/min), and remained for 5 min. The carrier gas was helium at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, and the injection volume used in each analysis was 0.5 µL.
The mass spectrometer (Agilent 5975N, Agilent Technologies Incorporated, Santa Clara, CA, USA) used an electron ionization source with 70 eV ionization energy. The ion source temperature was 230 • C, with a scanning range between 20 and 800 m/z. The temperature of the quadrupole was 150 • C, and the mass spectrum acquisition delay time was 4 min. The constituents were identified based on their retention index and confirmed by the use of mass spectral libraries (National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST databases). In addition, the major oil compounds were identified by co-injection with standards. The relative concentration of each component in the oil was quantified by a peak area normalization method integrated into the analysis.

Toxicity Bioassays of Bioactive Compounds
To assess the insecticidal activity of the identified four main bioactive compounds, insect mortality was determined through contact and fumigant bioassays.

Contact Bioassays
Each main compound and the essential oil were diluted in acetone to yield a concentration of 100 mg/mL, and 1 µL of each preparation was dropped on the dorsal thoracic region of larvae. Treatment with acetone was used as a blank control. Ten larvae (3rd instar) were used for treatment in a glass petri dish (90 × 20 mm in diameter), and five replicates were made. All topically treated individuals were maintained in incubators (25 ± 1 • C, 70 ± 5%, RH, 16 L: 8 D), and larval mortality was recorded after 12 and 24 h. The larvae were judged to be dead if there was no reaction to touching the body with a brush. Cypermethrin served as a positive control.

Fumigant Bioassays
Three-day-old adult insects were assessed for fumigant toxicity. The chemicals and essential oil were prepared at a dose of 15 mg/mL using acetone. Application of acetone was used as a blank control. Dichlorvos was used for positive control. 10 µL of each sample was placed on filter paper (10 × 1.5 cm), which was placed in a 60-mL vial with ten adults, and the solvent evaporated after 15 s. Then, the vial was sealed immediately. All experiments were performed in incubators (25 ± 1 • C, 70 ± 5%, RH, 16 L: 8 D) for observation at 12 and 24 h. Five replicates were conducted. The adults were considered dead if they were unresponsive when the bottles were shaken.

Median Lethal Dose (LD 50 ) and Concentration (LC 50 )
To evaluate the insecticidal activity of (-)-4-terpineol, serial dilutions were prepared at different concentrations (10,20,30,50, 70 mg/mL) using acetone for the contact toxicity bioassay. For the fumigant toxicity bioassay, concentrations of 5, 7, 10, 15 and 30 mg/mL were prepared separately for evaluation. Mortality was determined after 24 h and 48 h. 50 ) of (-)-4-Terpineol 10 µL of (-)-4-terpineol dissolved in acetone was dropped onto filter paper at the LC 30 , LC 50 and LC 80 concentrations. After the solvent evaporated (15 s), they were placed in a 60-mL glass vial that contained ten adults. As controls, ten adults were treated with acetone alone in each case. Insects lying on the bottom that were unable to walk or fly were considered knocked down, and the number of knocked-down insects was registered at every 15 s for 15 min. In general, each replicate was interrupted when >90% of the insects were affected. Five independent replicates were carried out for each concentration.

Enzyme Preparation Method
Among four components, (-)-4-terpineol expressed significant insecticidal activity against P. xylostella adults. Hence, the levels of enzyme activities in adult exposure to (-)-4-terpineol were investigated. In the fumigant bioassays, adults obtained at 0.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h and 12 h post treatment with (-)-4-terpineol at the LC 30 , LC 50 , and LC 80 levels were subjected to enzyme preparation to determine the detoxification and neuron enzyme activities. Ten adults were placed in a glass homogenate tube and homogenized in 2 mL ice-cold normal saline. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4000 rpm (6887 g) for 10 min at 4 • C (centrifuge 5430R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), and the supernatant was used as an enzyme source for enzyme assays.

Protein Assay
The protein concentration was measured using the method of Bradford (1976) by adding 5 µL of adult homogenate to 15 µL phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2), and then 200 µL of Bio-Rad reagent was added in triplicate. After incubation of the mixture for 10 min at room temperature, the absorbance was measured of 200 µL in a 96-well microplate reader (SpectraMax i3x Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 590 nm. A bovine serum albumin standard curve obtained with the same method and reagents were used to convert the absorbance to protein concentration.

CAT Activity Assay
Preparation of H 2 O 2 solution: Firstly, 0.5 mL of 30% H 2 O 2 was taken to 50 mL of distilled water, phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.4) was added to the front-matched solution to measure the absorbance of this solution between 0.5 and 0.55 at 240 nm. Subsequently, the reaction mixtures contained 3 mL of the prepared solution and 20 µL of enzyme solution. The CAT activity of the mixture was recorded for 3 min with a spectrophotometer, and the experiment was performed in triplicate.

Na + /K + -ATPase
Enzyme assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) were used to measure the Na + /K + -ATPase activities of the enzymes. Briefly, the reaction mixtures contained prepared enzyme solution (0.1 mL), distilled water (0.12 mL) and working fluid (0.56 mL). Approximately 0.16 mL distilled water and 0.42 mL working fluid were mixed together to serve as blank controls. After incubating the mixtures at 37 • C for 10 min, the mixtures were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min to obtain a supernatant. The test solution contained 0.3 mL of prepared supernatant, 1.0 mL chromogenic agent and 1 mL working fluid. A total of 200 µL of the solution was added to a 96-well plate in each test, and the absorbance of each well was measured at 636 nm. Each sample, control, standard, and blank measurement was tested in triplicate, and each test was performed in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis
The insect mortality rates were corrected for mortality against the control using Abbott's formula [40], and the LD 50 , LC 50 and KT 50 values of the chemicals were analyzed using probit analysis [41]. All data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The differences between the groups were statistically compared by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at 5% significance. Analysis of 50% mortality (LC 50 , LD 50, and KT 50 ) resulting from treatment with (-)-4-terpineol was calculated by log-probit analysis containing 95% confidence limits. These data were plotted by GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Composition of the Essential Oil
The composition of the extracted essential oil is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Fortyseven compounds were identified, which accounted for 96.52% of the total essential oil. Among them, four major compounds accounted for 59.82% of the total oil by GC-MS analysis, including eucalyptol (21.57%), D(+)-camphor (17.33%), (-)-4-terpineol (9.96%), and caryophyllene oxide (10.96%). Therefore, the biological activities of these four compounds were tested in the next experiment.

Insecticidal Assays
In the assessment of contact activity against the third instar larvae of P. xylostella, the corrected mortality for compounds, essential oil and positive control were determined after 12 h and 24 h. No mortality was observed in the control group. As shown in Figure 2, (-)-4-terpineol showed the best insecticidal activity among the four compounds, which had the same effect as the positive control (cypermethrin). The corrected mortality reached 100% at 12 h post treatment. Furthermore, the insecticidal effect of (-)-4-terpineol was significantly (F = 32.00, df = 5, 16, p < 0.01) better than that of the essential oil.

Insecticidal Assays
In the assessment of contact activity against the third instar larvae of P. xylostell corrected mortality for compounds, essential oil and positive control were determ after 12 h and 24 h. No mortality was observed in the control group. As shown in F 2, (-)-4-terpineol showed the best insecticidal activity among the four compounds, w had the same effect as the positive control (cypermethrin). The corrected mor reached 100% at 12 h post treatment. Furthermore, the insecticidal effect of (-)-4-terp was significantly (F = 32.00, df = 5, 16, p < 0.01) better than that of the essential oil. The insecticidal activity against P. xylostella adults of the four compounds essential oil were also tested by fumigant toxicity bioassays (Figure 3). Similar t results of contact activity, (-)-4-terpineol showed the best insecticidal activity again xylostella adults, which resulted in 100% insect mortality at 24 h. Additionally insecticidal effect of (-)-4-terpineol was significantly (F = 35.56, df = 5, 16, p < 0.01) b than that of the essential oil. The control had no insect mortality, and the positive co (dichlorvos) also exhibited 100% mortality. Meanwhile, the D(+)-camphor recorded insect mortality at 24 h, but it was not significantly different from that of (-)-4-terpin 12 h exposure. During the experiment, it was found that a large number of test a treated with essential oil were knocked down in the early stage, but they mostly wok after 8 h of treatment. Thus, the essential oil showed 41.11% mortality at 12 h. The insecticidal activity against P. xylostella adults of the four compounds and essential oil were also tested by fumigant toxicity bioassays (Figure 3). Similar to the results of contact activity, (-)-4-terpineol showed the best insecticidal activity against P. xylostella adults, which resulted in 100% insect mortality at 24 h. Additionally, the insecticidal effect of (-)-4-terpineol was significantly (F = 35.56, df = 5, 16, p < 0.01) better than that of the essential oil. The control had no insect mortality, and the positive control (dichlorvos) also exhibited 100% mortality. Meanwhile, the D(+)-camphor recorded 100% insect mortality at 24 h, but it was not significantly different from that of (-)-4-terpineol at 12 h exposure. During the experiment, it was found that a large number of test adults treated with essential oil were knocked down in the early stage, but they mostly woke up after 8 h of treatment. Thus, the essential oil showed 41.11% mortality at 12 h.

Toxicity Bioassays
Bioassays of individual compounds revealed that (-)-4-terpineol was significantly more active than the whole essential oil. As for the contact toxicity bioassays, (-)-4terpineol also had promising considerable larvicidal activity against the larvae of P. xylostella with LD50 = 43.15 (36.93 to 50.41) mg/mL at 12 h and 31.22 (24.36-40.00) mg/mL at 24 h post treatment, respectively (Figure 4a,b). The results showed that (-)-4-terpineol was more active against P. xylostella adults in the fumigant bioassays than in the contact toxicity (Figure 4c

Toxicity Bioassays
Bioassays of individual compounds revealed that (-)-4-terpineol was significantly more active than the whole essential oil. As for the contact toxicity bioassays, (-)-4-terpineol also had promising considerable larvicidal activity against the larvae of P. xylostella with LD 50 = 43.15 (36.93 to 50.41) mg/mL at 12 h and 31.22 (24.36-40.00) mg/mL at 24 h post treatment, respectively (Figure 4a,b). The results showed that (-)-4-terpineol was more active against P. xylostella adults in the fumigant bioassays than in the contact toxicity (Figure 4c

Median Knockdown Time (KT 50 ) of (-)-4-Terpineol
After being fumigated by (-)-4-terpineol, the test insects were knocked down firstly and lost their ability to fly normally. The different concentrations showed different levels of bioactivities against the adults (Table 2). After treatment with the LC 30 , LC 50 and LC 80 concentration, the KT 50 values were 9.50, 6.07 and 5.09 min, respectively. Adults in the control group flew normally in the bottle with no knockdown phenomenon. Generally, KT 50 values decreased with increasing (-)-4-terpineol concentration and thus the susceptibility of adult P. xylostella was directly associated with (-)-4-terpineol concentration as well as the time of exposure.

Enzyme Activities Assays
The enzyme activities in P. xylostella adults treated with compound (-)-4-terpineol are presented in Figure 5. The GST enzyme activities of the P. xylostella were significantly decreased when they were treated with (-)-4-terpineol for 2 h, and then they increased after 8 h of exposure. Finally, we found that GST activity in specimens treated with LC 50 and LC 80 was decreased in comparison to the control after 12 h exposure, and the GST levels were 0.64-fold and 0.66-fold, respectively, relative to the control.
terpineol also had promising considerable larvicidal activity against the larvae xylostella with LD50 = 43.15 (36.93 to 50.41) mg/mL at 12 h and 31.22 (24.36-40.00) m at 24 h post treatment, respectively (Figure 4a,b). The results showed that (-)-4-ter was more active against P. xylostella adults in the fumigant bioassays than in the c toxicity (Figure 4c,d), with LC50 values of 8.34 (7.40-9.40) mg/mL at 12 h and 7.35 ( 8.09) mg/mL at 24 h post treatment.   50 : Lethal dosage that kills 50% of the exposed larvae, expressed in mg/mL. LC 50 : Lethal concentration that kills 50% of the exposed adults, expressed in mg/mL. CAT activity did not show any significant inhibition for the first 4 h. After 8 h of exposure, the CAT activities decreased significantly in the different treatments, and the bioactive compound had a greater effect on the enzyme activity as the concentration increased. Moreover, compared with those in the control group after 12 h of application, the CAT expression levels were 0.81-fold, 0.63-fold, and 0.49-fold at concentrations of LC 30 , LC 50 and LC 80 , respectively.
In the first 2 h, compared with the control, the AChE activities showed no effect when treated with (-)-4-terpineol at LC 50 and LC 80 , except the concentration of LC 30 at 0.5 h, which was increased. High-concentration treatment (LC 80 ) had the greatest inhibitory effect on the enzyme viability by 0.22-fold after exposure for 12 h.
The compound (-)-4-terpineol at different concentrations could affect the Na + /K + -ATPase activity of P. xylostella adults via the induction or inhibition of enzyme activities. Those treated with LC 30 showed a significant increase in comparison to the control after 2 h. After 4 h of exposure, all concentration treatments significantly decreased the Na + /K + -ATPase activity. Among the four enzyme activities, (-)-4-terpineol has a high degree of inhibition of Na + /K + -ATPase activity. Likewise, compared with those in the control group after 12 h, the expression levels of Na + /K + -ATPase at LC 30 , LC 50 and LC 80 were inhibited rapidly by 0.62-fold, 0.20-fold, and 0.35-fold, respectively.
CAT activity did not show any significant inhibition for the first 4 h. After 8 h of exposure, the CAT activities decreased significantly in the different treatments, and the bioactive compound had a greater effect on the enzyme activity as the concentration increased. Moreover, compared with those in the control group after 12 h of application, the CAT expression levels were 0.81-fold, 0.63-fold, and 0.49-fold at concentrations of LC30, LC50 and LC80, respectively.
In the first 2 h, compared with the control, the AChE activities showed no effect when treated with (-)-4-terpineol at LC50 and LC80, except the concentration of LC30 at 0.5 h, which was increased. High-concentration treatment (LC80) had the greatest inhibitory effect on the enzyme viability by 0.22-fold after exposure for 12 h.
The compound (-)-4-terpineol at different concentrations could affect the Na + /K + -ATPase activity of P. xylostella adults via the induction or inhibition of enzyme activities. Those treated with LC30 showed a significant increase in comparison to the control after 2 h. After 4 h of exposure, all concentration treatments significantly decreased the Na + /K + -ATPase activity. Among the four enzyme activities, (-)-4-terpineol has a high degree of inhibition of Na + /K + -ATPase activity. Likewise, compared with those in the control group after 12 h, the expression levels of Na + /K + -ATPase at LC30, LC50 and LC80 were inhibited rapidly by 0.62-fold, 0.20-fold, and 0.35-fold, respectively.

Discussion
Essential oils are natural complex secondary metabolites [42]. Most essential oils comprise monoterpenes (C 10 ), sesquiterpenes (C 15 ), and higher terpenes. Previous study showed that essential oils and their constituents have insecticidal properties against diverse pests [43][44][45][46]. For instance, carvone, menthol, cineole [47], thymol, 1,8-cineole, terpineol, carvacrol, linalool [48], and citronellal [10] have been evaluated as fumigants against Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), and cineole also had contact toxicity against this pest [47]. The essential oil from A. lavandulaefolia was isolated in our study. The main components were eucalyptol, D(+)-camphor, (-)-4-terpineol and caryophyllene oxide. To evaluate whether there was insecticidal toxicity of four compounds identified from the essential oil, an experiment using pure samples was carried out. The results revealed that (-)-4-terpineol showed a significantly stronger insecticidal activity against P. xylostella via contact and fumigant toxicity than the other compounds. Also, the D(+)-camphor recorded 100% insect mortality at 24 h by fumigant bioassay. Previous study demonstrated that D(+)-camphor showed strong fumigant toxicity against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [49]. Furthermore, eucalyptol and caryophyllene oxide were less active to P. xylostella; however, it is possible that they may be effective at higher doses. The fumigation effect of the two main constituents from Chenopodium ambrosioides L. essential oil, a-terpinene and p-cymene, against P. xylostella larvae was determined with LC 50 values of 284.6225 and 221.6663 mg/mL, respectively [50]. Our study demonstrated that (-)-4-terpineol showed stronger toxicity in the fumigant bioassay, and the corrected mortality reached 100% at a dose of 15 mg/mL; the LC 50 was 8.34 mg/mL at 12 h of exposure and 7.35 mg/mL at 24 h of exposure. After treatment with the LC 50 concentration, the adults were hyperactive and the KT 50 value was only 6.07 min. To the best of our knowledge, not much work on the insecticidal activities of the (-)-4-terpineol has been performed. Furthermore, in our study, the bioassays of the major component (-)-4-terpineol showed that it was significantly more active than the crude essential oil. Thus, it can be inferred that (-)-4-terpineol may act as the major compound with good insecticidal potential among the four compounds. Consistently, the trans-p-Mentha-1(7), 8-dien-2-ol showed stronger insecticidal toxicity than essential oil and other compounds by contact and fumigant toxicity [51]. Similar observations have been reported by Muturi et al. [52], who found that the single constituent patchouli alcohol, identified from honeysuckle essential oil, was significantly more toxic against Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) than the whole essential oil and its other constituents. However, a variety of documents suggest that complex mixtures would be more efficient and synergistic effects have been reported [53]. It is demonstrated that thymol and α-terpineol synergized the impacts of both linalool and 1,8-cineole, but linalool with 1,8-cineole exhibited only an additive effect against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) [54]. Consequently, future research needs to focus on developing unique mixtures that can serve as acute toxicant. Enzymes in insects play important roles in biochemical reactions and physiological effects in toxicological studies [55]. Therefore, the effects on GST, CAT, AChE and Na + /K + -ATPase were studied based on the highest toxicity of (-)-4-terpineol in this study. Glutathione-S-transferases are well-known detoxification enzymes that metabolize potentially toxic substances to reduce toxicity [56]. In this study, the GST enzyme activity showed a decreasing trend within 2 h exposure, which showed that the detoxification enzyme in P. xylostella started to work after exposure to (-)-4-terpineol, and then it could not be detoxified in the insect body and appeared to be inhibited. Similar results were reported by Liao et al. [57], who found that the activities of GST in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were notably inhibited by Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil compared with the control. This may be due to the low detoxification ability of the pests against these exogenous compounds at the beginning. Afterwards, (-)-4-terpineol induced the detoxification mechanism of P. xylostella after 4 h of treatment, which led to the activity of GST increasing for a short time and then decreasing; the reduced enzyme activity at later stages might be due to the long-term effects of the compound. In another study, the GST activity decreased in P. xylostella larvae that were treated with Chinese chive essential oil at LC 50 concentration after 24 h treatment relative to the controls [36]. Furthermore, catalase (CAT) is an important antioxidant enzyme in insects [37]. In our study, there was no effect on CAT activity in the early stage. However, it was inhibited significantly in different concentrations after 8 h of exposure, and the component used to treat insects notably inhibited the enzyme activity as the concentration increased, which is in alignment with the results of Rajkumar et al. [58] and Kiran and Prakash [59]. A significant decrease in CAT activity was observed for the essential oils of Mentha piperita and Gaultheria procumbens and their major compounds (menthone, menthol and methyl salicylate) when applied to three storage pests [60]. The fumigant toxicity of (-)-4-terpineol may be related to the inhibition of AChE due to the hyperactivity and knockdown effects observed in the experiments. Neural excitation and knockdown effects are the result of impairment in neuromuscular behavior [57]. Monoterpenoids in essential oils inhibited AChE activity, as reported by Miyazawa and Yamafuji [61]. Our current study revealed that the bioactive component (-)-4-terpineol increased the AChE activity of P. xylostella at sublethal concentrations at the early stage, whereas other concentrations made no difference in comparison to the control. Then, they were inhibited later. Higher AChE inhibitory effects were observed in the high-concentration treatment (LC 80 ), which inhibited enzyme viability by 0.22-fold relative to the control after exposure for 12 h. This result implied that the inhibition of AChE may lead to the accumulation of acetylcholine at neuromuscular junctions, which may in turn induce neuronal excitation, hyperactivity, paralysis, and ultimately result in insect death [62]. Furthermore, we investigated the possible involvement of another biochemical target (Na + /K + -ATPase), which is an important enzyme in the insect nervous system. Na + /K + -ATPase is the ion pump of Na + and K + in the epicyte of insects, which plays a crucial role in maintaining the ionic balance and nerve impulse of the insect body [63]. We observed that the insects were flying with excitement and twitching their heels and beaks during treatment. Moreover, our work ascertained that (-)-4-terpineol at different concentrations could significantly inhibit the Na + /K + -ATPase activity of P. xylostella. In particular, the expression level of Na + /K + -ATPase at LC 50 was inhibited rapidly by 0.20-fold compared with those in the control group after 12 h exposure. The implications of these results are that the enzyme inhibitory effect of (-)-4-terpineol may result in nerve aberration, metabolic disturbances, knockdown toxicity and insect mortality. Another study documented that Piper sarmentosum essential oil and myristicin showed a strong inhibiting effect on the activity of Na + /K + -ATPase in Brontispa longissima (Gestro) (Coleoptera: Hispidae) larvae [63]. All nine terpene derivatives identified from Citrus sinensis essential oil caused a pronounced reduction in this enzyme in Callosobrunchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) adults, and the reduction in enzyme activity was in a dose-dependent manner [64]. Although these bioactive compounds have different effects on different enzymes, their effects on the enzyme activities are still very complicated because these components may accumulate together and work synergistically in vivo. Overall, enzymes in pests exposed to (-)-4-terpineol were inhibited. Thus, these findings revealed that the biochemical reaction/physiological disturbances of pests may be involved in the toxic effects of (-)-4-terpineol on insects.

Conclusions
In conclusion, the investigation of chemical components from natural products is vital to the development of new insecticides. Based on the results presented in this work, a bioactive ingredient of A. lavandulaefolia essential oil, (-)-4-terpineol, showed promising insecticidal activity against P. xylostella. This effect was associated with decreased activity of GST, CAT, AChE and Na + /K + -ATPase. In the future, the detailed mechanisms of action of (-)-4-terpineol were necessary to be explored. Also, studies on the insecticidal efficiency of (-)-4-terpineol under the field conditions are needed.