Comparison of Friction Properties of GI Steel Plates with Various Surface Treatments

: This article presents the improved properties of GI (hot-dip galvanized) steel plates in combination with a special permanent surface treatment. The substrate used was hot-dip galvanized deep-drawn steel sheets of grade DX56D + Z. Subsequently, various surface treatments were applied to their surface. The coefficient of friction of the metal sheets without surface treatment, with a temporary surface treatment called passivation, and a thin organic coating (TOC) based on hydroxyl resins dissolved in water, Ti and Cr 3+ were determined by a cup test. The surface quality and corrosion resistance of all tested samples were also determined by exposing them for up to 288 h in an atmosphere of neutral salt spray. The surface microgeometry parameters Ra, RPc and Rz(I), which have a significant influence on the pressing process itself, were also determined. The TOC deposited on the Zn substrate was the only one to exhibit excellent lubrication and anticorrosion properties, resulting in the lowest surface microgeometry values owing to the uniform and continuous layer of the thin organic coating compared to the GI substrate and passivation surface treatment, respectively.


Introduction
The formability of steel plates and the shape of the final parts made from them depend on factors such as the material (its mechanical properties and surface microgeometry) [1,2]; the forming die geometry (die clearance, radii of the punch and die) and microgeometry (roughness of contact surfaces) [3][4][5]; the technological parameters (temperature, strain rate, blank holding forces, contact pressure, etc.) [6][7][8]; the properties of the tool's material (hardness, chemical composition, structure) [9]; and the type and amount of lubricant used [10].During the deep drawing process, the individual parameters change and their mutual interaction has an influence on the formability, which is largely influenced by the lubricant or lubrication strategy.Correct selection of the lubricant is therefore one of the fundamental factors that ensures either the quality of the deep drawing process or its result in the form of the stamped part itself [11,12].
The functions of the lubricant in the deep drawing process are usually of a different nature.In general, however, the role of the lubricant is to minimize the friction acting on the contact surfaces of the tool in order to achieve the greatest possible ductility and to take maximum advantage of all of the plastic properties of the material [13].Lubricants must perform other functions, such as the protection of metal sheets against corrosion, easy application and the removal of surfaces when necessary [14].Nowadays, novel tribological systems are being studied, such as using volatile medium-like liquid carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and gaseous nitrogen, directly introduced into the friction zones during deep drawing.These alternatives aim to reduce environmental impacts and eliminate the need for postforming cleaning processes [15].Good adhesion and homogeneity of the lubricant on the surface of the sheet must also be ensured from application through to transport, storage and processing.Lubricants must be stable in the pressing process as well as non-hazardous and their application should be cost-effective [16].
One possible way to obtain these properties for a specific area of the stampings produced is the development of coatings based on a combination of a zinc coating with an applied permanent thin organic coating.Such a coating should be compatible with all Zn coatings and remain on the metal sheets during pressing [17,18].The low coefficient of friction obtained should allow for more uniform reshaping in tooling and for maximum use of the mechanical properties for sharper lines of the stampings [19,20].The dry lubricant on the steel plates should meet the requirement of eliminating coating flaking and the need for additional oil, thus keeping the forming presses (the contact surfaces of the blank holder, punch and die) clean and ready for the next step of production [21].A typical permanent coating consists of a coating-forming material (resin) and different types of additives (forming additives and corrosion inhibitors) [22][23][24] enhancing conductivity and/or corrosion protection [25].
An example of such surface treatment on Zn, Al-Zn, Al-Zn-Si, Mg-Al-Zn and other substrates is a thin organic coating (TOC).The coating contains a limited amount of inorganic Cr 3+ and Ti components [26].After drying, they form a thin dry film with a thickness from 0.8 to 1.7 µm (i.e., 1.0 to 2.0 g/m 2 ).The coating serves as a permanent protection for galvanized sheet metal in transparent and colored versions [26][27][28][29].Steel sheets with a thin organic coating currently provide an effective solution for applications where traditional passivated or oiled galvanized material is used, particularly in corrosion-sensitive conditions.The advantages and functional properties of the coating are excellent corrosion resistance and the absence of hexavalent chromium, which is RoHS-compliant based on Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and the Council [30].The coating improves the formability due to the lower coefficient of friction "f", whose value of less than 0.15 is strictly required by sheet metal fabricators, especially in the white goods sector.When forming sheet metal with such surface protection, there is no need to add any pressing oils as it is also compatible with subsequent joining processes (gluing, welding. ..).A thin organic coating is also characterized by AFP-anti finger print, i.e., fingerprint resistance.In addition, these coated steel sheets are suitable for painting without any pre-treatment, for interior and exterior use, as well as for exposed and unexposed parts of products.This coating has a wide range of applications: construction-profiles, electronics-TV panels and Hi-Fi systems, and others-furniture, air conditioning, appliances, etc. [25][26][27][28][29].
The tribological behavior of TOCs is being tested by different methods to evaluate the friction coefficient in dry/wet contact conditions.The modified scratch test is well suited to serve as a first screening method to compare the tribological performance of different types of thin organic permanent coatings for forming applications [31,32].Pin-on-disc/ballon-disc tests are useful when determining the friction coefficient of organic/inorganic coatings [33,34].While the mentioned tests belong to the basic testing methods performed in laboratory conditions, the bending under tension test allows for the modeling of the friction conditions on the edge of the die [31,35,36].More complex tests, involving real conditions in deep drawing/stretching processes, are the cup test and biaxial stretching test.In [37], the authors tested the formability of organic coated steel sheet metal by using the cup test and biaxial stretching, focusing on the fracture behavior of the coating during forming operations.A biaxial tension state showed a greater effect on the coating compared to a mixed compression-tension state, even if the crack development was demonstrated to be similar.By using the cup test, it is possible to model the stress of the contact surfaces during sheet metal forming [38].The cup test offers a more CF-process-relevant determination approach for the prediction of the technological characteristics of the deep drawing process [39,40].
The aim of this paper is to study the tribological and corrosion properties of a thin organic coating (TOC) based on hydroxyl resins dissolved in water and compare them with a standard Zn coating and a passivated one.All of these coatings were created on a standard drawing quality steel substrate.

Experimental Materials-Substrate and Coatings
This experimental study was carried out on 1.0 mm thick steel sheet specimens of deepdrawn grade DX56D + Z. Tested samples of hot-dip galvanized steel sheet (GI substrate) were used as the reference material with a Zn layer thickness of 80 g/m 2 (40/40 g/m 2 ).Further, for comparison, the same quality hot-dip Zn coating with an applied surface treatment called passivation (based on inorganic substances) and also the same Zn coating with the TOC in a white shade were used.It is a single-component product based on Ti and Cr 3+ .All of these coatings were in the same condition "as delivered" [27].
Figure 1 depicts a selected region of the metallographic section of the sample with the TOC analyzed under an Olympus GX 71 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).The Zn layer thickness was from 5 to 7 µm on both the top and bottom of the steel substrate.The thickness of the organic coating was controlled during its application to the Zn substrate according to the titanium content of the coating and the thickness of the dry film on the surface of the Zn substrate.
relevant determination approach for the prediction of the technological characteristics of the deep drawing process [39,40].
The aim of this paper is to study the tribological and corrosion properties of a thin organic coating (TOC) based on hydroxyl resins dissolved in water and compare them with a standard Zn coating and a passivated one.All of these coatings were created on a standard drawing quality steel substrate.

Experimental Materials-Substrate and Coatings
This experimental study was carried out on 1.0 mm thick steel sheet specimens of deep-drawn grade DX56D + Z. Tested samples of hot-dip galvanized steel sheet (GI substrate) were used as the reference material with a Zn layer thickness of 80 g/m 2 (40/40 g/m 2 ).Further, for comparison, the same quality hot-dip Zn coating with an applied surface treatment called passivation (based on inorganic substances) and also the same Zn coating with the TOC in a white shade were used.It is a single-component product based on Ti and Cr 3+ .All of these coatings were in the same condition "as delivered" [27].
Figure 1 depicts a selected region of the metallographic section of the sample with the TOC analyzed under an Olympus GX 71 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).The Zn layer thickness was from 5 to 7 µm on both the top and bottom of the steel substrate.The thickness of the organic coating was controlled during its application to the Zn substrate according to the titanium content of the coating and the thickness of the dry film on the surface of the Zn substrate.The EDX/SEM analysis of the surface treatment (Figure 2b) confirmed a relatively stable chromium content in the range of 0.3 ± 0.1 wt%, which also corresponded with the required thickness of the coating applied.The uniform distribution of the pigment particles in the TOC after application to the steel sheet was also observed.The analysis was performed using a TESCAN VEGA 3 scanning electron microscope (TESCAN GROUP, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) coupled with an OXFORD Instruments EDS analyzer.The EDX/SEM analysis of the surface treatment (Figure 2b) confirmed a relatively stable chromium content in the range of 0.3 ± 0.1 wt%, which also corresponded with the required thickness of the coating applied.The uniform distribution of the pigment particles in the TOC after application to the steel sheet was also observed.The analysis was performed using a TESCAN VEGA 3 scanning electron microscope (TESCAN GROUP, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) coupled with an OXFORD Instruments EDS analyzer.The chemical composition of the substrate, which meets the prescribed limits of EN 10346 [41] (Table 1), was determined with an OBLF QSG 750 Analyzer (OBLF, Witten, DE, Germany) by using optical emission spectral analysis.

C
Mn Si P S Ti The chemical composition of the substrate, which meets the prescribed limits of EN 10346 [41] (Table 1), was determined with an OBLF QSG 750 Analyzer (OBLF, Witten, DE, Germany) by using optical emission spectral analysis.

Mechanical Properties of Substrate
The mechanical properties were determined by using a Zwick/Roell Z050 machine (Ulm, Germany) in the transversal direction (90 • ) to the rolling direction and meet the limits shown in Table 2.These properties were determined according to EN ISO 6892-1 [42], the normal anisotropy "r" was determined according to EN ISO 10113 [43] and the strain hardening exponent "n" was determined according to EN ISO 10275 [44] on standardized specimens (20 mm in width and 80 mm of original gauge length).The plastic strain ratio was determined at 20% of the engineering strain level and the strain hardening exponent was determined within the strain interval of 5% to uniform elongation A g [42][43][44].

Cup Test
To determine the lubrication properties (the value of the friction coefficient on the contact surfaces of the die and the blank holder), the well-known formability test-the cup test-was used, which simulates the stresses on the material in a real deep drawing process [38][39][40].This test can be used to describe the most frequent contacts in the tribological system between the tool (punch, blank holder, die), friction material (sheet metal specimen/product) and intermediate material (lubricant, oil, foil or permanent special coating on sheet metal)-Figure 3 [12,38].

Cup Test
To determine the lubrication properties (the value of the friction coefficien contact surfaces of the die and the blank holder), the well-known formability t cup test-was used, which simulates the stresses on the material in a real deep process [38][39][40].This test can be used to describe the most frequent contacts in t logical system between the tool (punch, blank holder, die), friction material (she specimen/product) and intermediate material (lubricant, oil, foil or permanen coating on sheet metal)-Figure 3 [12,38].
The friction coefficient "f" of the tested specimens with different surface tre was determined on the basis of the increase in the contact force and the subsequen of the tensile forces.The coefficient of friction generally represents the ratio of tional force between two surfaces (press tool-sheet metal) and the load applied dicular to these surfaces.It should not be overlooked that the coefficient of fric pends not only on the condition of the surface (surface roughness, surface with or lubricant) but also on other boundary conditions such as contact force, drawin etc.The cup test allows for the modeling of the tribological conditions at the con faces of the tribo-system tool-lubricant-material, as they are carried out under s erational deep drawing conditions.Thus, this test is closer to the real deep draw cess and allows us to determine the friction coefficient under the blank holder.The coefficient "f" was determined for each type of surface (GI coating) specified as f Figure 3.The principle of the cup test to determine the friction coefficient: (a) the friction forces during the cup test: T 1i,j is the friction force under the blank holder, T 2i,j is the normal force at the die radius, T 3i,j is the friction force at the die radius and T 4i,j is the friction force at the punch radius; (b) a schematic illustration of the cup test: F N is the blank holder force and F t is the drawing force [12,38].
The friction coefficient "f" of the tested specimens with different surface treatments was determined on the basis of the increase in the contact force and the subsequent results of the tensile forces.The coefficient of friction generally represents the ratio of the frictional force between two surfaces (press tool-sheet metal) and the load applied perpendicular to these surfaces.It should not be overlooked that the coefficient of friction depends not only on the condition of the surface (surface roughness, surface with or without lubricant) but also on other boundary conditions such as contact force, drawing speed, etc.
The cup test allows for the modeling of the tribological conditions at the contact surfaces of the tribo-system tool-lubricant-material, as they are carried out under semioperational deep drawing conditions.Thus, this test is closer to the real deep drawing process and allows us to determine the friction coefficient under the blank holder.The friction coefficient "f" was determined for each type of surface (GI coating) specified as follows: A-Reference GI coating (as supplied); B-Passivated GI coating; C-GI coating with the thin organic coating.
To determine the friction coefficient, a flat-bottomed punch with a diameter of ø 50 mm was used.Circular blanks with a constant diameter of 90 mm were cut out and subsequently subjected to plastic deformation on an Erichsen 145/60 hydraulic testing machine (Erichsen GmbH & Co. KG, Hemer, Germany).The blank holder force F N represented loads of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 kN and the punch speed was kept constant (60 mm•min −1 ) during the test.Ten cups were drawn for each level of the blank holder force.At these holding forces, the maximum drawing force F t required to reshape the blank was recorded from the entire force course.Then, an average value of the drawing force and its standard deviation were calculated.After plotting F t -F N on a graph and interpolating the trend equation over these values, a linear relationship was obtained, where the angle under the curve represents the friction in the contact surfaces between the press tool and the sheet metal specimen.Thus, the evaluation method used a regression analysis where the slope of this linear trend line represents the value of the friction coefficient 'f' [12,40].
During the cup test (Figure 3), each blank holding force F N corresponded to the maximum tensile force F t -Figure 4a.A change in the blank holding force caused the maximum drawing force F t to change.The graph shows that the relationship F t -F N is linearly dependent (curve 1, Figure 4b) and it can be approximated as follows [12,40]: Lubricants 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 14 At these holding forces, the maximum drawing force Ft required to reshape the blank was recorded from the entire force course.Then, an average value of the drawing force and its standard deviation were calculated.After plotting Ft-FN on a graph and interpolating the trend equation over these values, a linear relationship was obtained, where the angle under the curve represents the friction in the contact surfaces between the press tool and the sheet metal specimen.Thus, the evaluation method used a regression analysis where the slope of this linear trend line represents the value of the friction coefficient 'f' [12,40].
During the cup test (Figure 3), each blank holding force FN corresponded to the maximum tensile force Ft-Figure 4a.A change in the blank holding force caused the maximum drawing force Ft to change.The graph shows that the relationship Ft-FN is linearly dependent (curve 1, Figure 4b) and it can be approximated as follows [12,40]: The slope of the curve, given by the angle β1, characterizes the friction conditions between the tool and the blank.Then, the friction coefficient is determined as follows: In the case of a lubricant with improved frictional properties (lower coefficient of friction), we obtain lower drawing forces FTi* for the same blank holding force FNi and thus a new relationship FTi*-FNi (curve 2, Figure 4b).The slope of curve 2 (β2) is less than the slope of curve 1 (β1) and is proportional to the coefficient of friction between the tool and the blank.

Surface Microgeometry
Measuring the roughness parameters was carried out on a roughness measuring device, Hommel Tester T2000 (Hommelwerke, Schwenningen, Germany).Measurements of the roughness parameters Ra (arithmetic mean deviation of profile), RPc (peak count number) and Rz (maximum height of profile) were carried out on all sheet metal specimens from both sides of the blank (A side, B side) at five different points uniformly distributed on each specimen.Then, the average value of each evaluated parameter was cal- The slope of the curve, given by the angle β 1 , characterizes the friction conditions between the tool and the blank.Then, the friction coefficient is determined as follows: In the case of a lubricant with improved frictional properties (lower coefficient of friction), we obtain lower drawing forces F Ti * for the same blank holding force F Ni and thus a new relationship F Ti *-F Ni (curve 2, Figure 4b).The slope of curve 2 (β 2 ) is less than the slope of curve 1 (β 1 ) and is proportional to the coefficient of friction between the tool and the blank.

Surface Microgeometry
Measuring the roughness parameters was carried out on a roughness measuring device, Hommel Tester T2000 (Hommelwerke, Schwenningen, Germany).Measurements of the roughness parameters Ra (arithmetic mean deviation of profile), RPc (peak count number) and Rz (maximum height of profile) were carried out on all sheet metal specimens from both sides of the blank (A side, B side) at five different points uniformly distributed on each specimen.Then, the average value of each evaluated parameter was calculated.

Corrosion Resistance according to ISO 9227
All tested specimens were placed in the SKBW 400 A-TR corrosion chamber (Liebisch GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld, Germany) and tested in an atmosphere of neutral salt spray (NSS) according to ISO 9227 [45].A 5% sodium chloride solution (50 g/L ± 5 g/L of NaCl) was continuously sprayed onto the samples placed in the rack at an angle of 20 • ± 5 • to the vertical direction using an air nozzle at an ambient temperature T = 35 ± 2 • C. The accelerated corrosion test was carried out to detect discontinuous layers, such as pores and other defects, in certain metallic, organic, anodic oxide and conversion specialty coatings.The size of all tested specimens was 210 × 290 mm and the corrosion resistance of the coatings was evaluated based on the time until the appearance of white corrosion, evaluated after 5, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 216 and 288 h spent in the corrosion chamber.

Results
The average values of the surface microgeometry parameters calculated from the five measured values on each side of the specimens are presented in Table 3 for each coating used in the experiment.As it is shown in the table, the reference "as supplied" GI coating showed an Ra value of 1.153 ± 0.170 µm, an Rz value of 7.028 ± 0.878 µm and an RPc value of 50.7 ± 10.0 cm −1 with a low difference when measured on each side of the steel sheet.The same tendency was noted for the GI passivated surface, with average values of Ra = 1.050 ± 0.132 µm, Rz = 6.754 ± 0.453 µm and RPc = 49.2 ± 5.6 cm −1 , and for the GI coating with the TOC, with average values of Ra = 0.934 ± 0.101 µm, Rz = 5.957 ± 0.505 µm and RPc = 48.5 ± 5.681 cm −1 .It can be concluded that the applied organic coating follows the morphology of the substrate surface, and the applied dry film microlayer influences the microgeometry of the coating by decreasing the coating roughness parameters Ra and Rz, while maintaining RPc at almost the same value.
The results of the drawing force measurement in the cup test for each coating are shown in Table 4.When the GI coating was lubricated by the oil during the cup test, the drawing forces ranged from 60.3 to 69.8 kN (Figure 5), with an increasing blank holder force, while the standard deviation was from 0.9 to 1.3 kN.Thus, a linear trend line that approximates the average values of the drawing forces predicts a friction coefficient f GI = 0.119 with a Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.999.The same tendency but a lower friction coefficient was found when the GI coating after passivation was used (dry friction): the drawing forces increased from 52.1 to 59.2 kN, with a standard deviation from 0.7 to 1.0 kN.The friction coefficient was f GIpass = 0.091, with a Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.999.The lowest drawing forces were measured when the GI coating with the TOC was tested: the drawing forces increased from 41.7 to 46.1 kN, with a standard deviation from 2.0 to 2.3 kN.Thus, the lowest friction coefficient was determined as f GI + TOC = 0.053 with a Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.995.For each coating tested, a very good correlation between drawing force and blank holder force was determined.The adhesion of the coating to the substrate was evaluated after the cup test through visual inspection and microscopic analysis.No flaking or separation of the organic TOC from the substrate was observed on the surface of the cups (Figure 6; Canon EOS 100D 18 MPx with EFS 18-55 mm; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) at different FN blank holding force loads.Even at the maximum loading force FN = 50 kN, there was no adhesion of the coating or its elements to the drawing tool's contact surfaces (drawing die radius or blank holder The adhesion of the coating to the substrate was evaluated after the cup test through visual inspection and microscopic analysis.No flaking or separation of the organic TOC from the substrate was observed on the surface of the cups (Figure 6; Canon EOS 100D 18 MPx with EFS 18-55 mm; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) at different F N blank holding force loads.Even at the maximum loading force F N = 50 kN, there was no adhesion of the coating or its elements to the drawing tool's contact surfaces (drawing die radius or blank holder area).Thus, good adhesion of the TOC was observed.The results of the corrosion test after a selected number of hours in the corrosion chamber are shown in Figure 7. Based on the test results, it can be concluded that white corrosion appeared on the surface of the samples with the conventional GI coating without surface treatment during the first hours of exposure to a neutral atmosphere of salt solution.Surface treatment of the GI coating by means of standard passivation showed better corrosion resistance, i.e., the observation of white corrosion started after more than 24 h.The GI coating with the TOC showed the best corrosion resistance in relation to the compared coatings, with no observation of white corrosion for up to 144 h.Since the corrosion resistance limit for the TOC is set at 72 h (customer quality standard), the coated specimens still have a sufficient margin.
Figure 8 illustrates the comparison of time to white corrosion appearance between examined coatings.The results of the corrosion test after a selected number of hours in the corrosion chamber are shown in Figure 7. Based on the test results, it can be concluded that white corrosion appeared on the surface of the samples with the conventional GI coating without surface treatment during the first hours of exposure to a neutral atmosphere of salt solution.Surface treatment of the GI coating by means of standard passivation showed better corrosion resistance, i.e., the observation of white corrosion started after more than 24 h.The GI coating with the TOC showed the best corrosion resistance in relation to the compared coatings, with no observation of white corrosion for up to 144 h.Since the corrosion resistance limit for the TOC is set at 72 h (customer quality standard), the coated specimens still have a sufficient margin.

Discussion
From the perspective of steel sheet surface morphology, it can be concluded that the applied passivation and organic coating follow the morphology of the substrate surface, and the applied dry organic microlayer influences the microgeometry of the coating by

Discussion
From the perspective of steel sheet surface morphology, it can be concluded that the applied passivation and organic coating follow the morphology of the substrate surface, and the applied dry organic microlayer influences the microgeometry of the coating by

Discussion
From the perspective of steel sheet surface morphology, it can be concluded that the applied passivation and organic coating follow the morphology of the substrate surface, and the applied dry organic microlayer influences the microgeometry of the coating by decreasing the coating roughness parameters Ra and Rz.After passivation, the roughness of the passivated GI surface was Ra = 1.050 ± 0.132 µm and Rz = 6.754 ± 0.453 µm, while applying the organic coating decreased the roughness to Ra = 0.934 ± 0.101 µm and Rz = 5.957 ± 0.505.The surface morphology after phosphating depends on the deposition temperature and the concentration of the additives [46,47]; the self-lubricating coating can smooth the surface of the galvanized steel sheet and decrease the surface roughness of the galvanized steel sheet [48].
For all tested samples, GI as supplied, passivated GI and GI + TOC, the value of the friction coefficient determined by the cup test was f < 0.15 (the required parameter f max for final sheet metal processors is 0.15).Thus, for samples without surface treatment (GI), the value 0.119 was reached when oil was used as a lubricant, while for dry friction (no oil used) samples with passivation (GI + passivation), it was 0.091, and for samples with the thin organic coating (GI + TOC), the value was 0.053.
The effect of phosphating on lowering the friction coefficient was proven by Narayanan [49].Shih tested pre-phosphated DDQ and AHSS steels by using the bending under tension test and the results showed much a lower friction coefficient compared to without the pre-phosphated coating [50].But, in a dry condition, phosphate coatings usually do not have inherent low-friction properties and they have no practical effect on the friction coefficient [21,51].Carlsson [31,52] evaluated the friction coefficient of organic permanent coatings by using different basic tests.They achieved the lowest friction coefficient for a pure organic coating in the modified scratch test and pin-on-disc test within the range from 0.06 to 0.11, while in the bending under tension test, the friction coefficient varied from 0.16 to 0.17.Liu et al. [48] also studied self-lubricating coatings from the view of the influence of surface roughness on the friction coefficient and wear.Their results showed that within the range from 0.857 to 1.629 µm of the Ra value, the friction coefficient varied from 0.073 to 0.108 when measured by the reciprocating friction and wear tester.It may be concluded that when comparing the friction coefficient of 0.053 measured by the authors for the TOC (based on hydroxyl resins dissolved in water) by using the cup test, this value is comparable to the results mentioned.Thus, the positive effect of the TOC on lowering the friction coefficient in the deep drawing process can be elucidated.
The corrosion test showed the enhanced properties of the TOC applied on the GI steel compared to the passivated surface.The results are supported by other authors.Podjuklova et al. [53] proved the enhanced short-term corrosion protection of a transparent coating system containing particles of zinc compounds applied on steel sheets for enameling.Sarli et al. [54] applied polyurethane-based polymeric films on pretreated electrogalvanized steel which provided very effective protection against corrosion as a result of their excellent barrier properties.Gao et al. [55] studied acrylic coatings composed of modified MoS 2 nanosheets successfully prepared on the surface of galvanized sheets.Their results showed that modified MoS 2 nanosheets reduced the number of cracks in the coatings and made the coatings more compact.Furthermore, the coating's corrosion resistance was significantly enhanced.Li et al. [56] clarified the roles of titanium-containing materials in improving coatings when studying organic-inorganic hybrid coatings.As Kuznetsov analyzed [57], appropriately selected inhibitors will form a durable protective layer on the surface, preventing the formation of corrosion.

Conclusions
Based on this study's findings, it can be concluded that the tested sheet metal specimens with the TOC based on hydroxyl resins dissolved in water showed the most suitable lubrication properties due to the continuous coating layer compared to the other tested specimens.The lowest friction coefficient when measured by using the cup test in dry conditions resulted in lower drawing forces.
The dependence of the deep drawing force on the blank holding force is linear, and thanks to the special TOC surface treatment, the coefficient of friction was reduced from 0.119 to 0.053, which is more than half.
Good adhesion of the TOC was observed at each level of the blank holding force.No elements of the coating adhered to the drawing tool's contact surfaces.
As proved by the corrosion test, GI + TOC showed enhanced corrosion properties.The time to white corrosion appearance was greater than 72 h, as required by the customer, or more than twice that when compared to the GI passivated surface.
Thus, using GI + TOC based on hydroxyl resins dissolved in water, Ti and Cr 3+ without the addition of pressing oils as a lubricant has several advantages-cost savings, an ecological clean process, savings on pressing tools and equipment, a decreased maintenance time and also much better corrosion resistance.Potential industrial applications of the studied TOC lie in a wide range of industries (construction, electronics, air conditioning, appliances, etc.) where metal sheet processing using stamping operations is involved.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Cross-section of galvanized steel substrate with TOC layer.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Cross-section of galvanized steel substrate with TOC layer.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.The principle of the cup test to determine the friction coefficient: (a) the fricti during the cup test: T1i,j is the friction force under the blank holder, T2i,j is the normal force radius, T3i,j is the friction force at the die radius and T4i,j is the friction force at the punch r a schematic illustration of the cup test: FN is the blank holder force and Ft is the drawing for

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Evaluation of the cup test: (a) determination of the maximum drawing force Ft from the record of the force course; (b) determination of the friction coefficient for different lubricants [12,38,40].

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Evaluation of the cup test: (a) determination of the maximum drawing force F t from the record of the force course; (b) determination of the friction coefficient for different lubricants [12,38,40].

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Regression analysis of measured drawing forces.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Regression analysis of measured drawing forces.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.Comparison of time to white corrosion for examined coatings.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Kinetics of corrosion resistance of different coatings: (a) GI coating as reference one (as supplied); (b) passivated GI coating; (c) GI coating with TOC.

Figure 8
Figure 8 illustrates the comparison of time to white corrosion appearance between examined coatings.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Kinetics of corrosion resistance of different coatings: (a) GI coating as reference one (as supplied); (b) passivated GI coating; (c) GI coating with TOC.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.Comparison of time to white corrosion for examined coatings.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8.Comparison of time to white corrosion for examined coatings.
R p0.2 (YS) is proof strength; R m (UTS) is ultimate tensile strength; A 80 is percentage elongation after fracture; r is plastic strain ratio; n is strain hardening exponent.

Table 3 .
The average values of the surface microgeometry parameters measured at 90 • to the rolling direction.

Table 4 .
The deep drawing forces measured in the cup test for each blank holder force.