Balticalcarus archibaldi Simutnik Gen. et sp. n. (Chalcidoidea, Encyrtidae) with the Unusually Small Mesotibial Spur from Baltic Amber

Balticalcarus archibaldi Simutnik, gen. et sp. n., is described and illustrated based on a female specimen from late Eocene Baltic amber. The new genus is characterized by the absence of a filum spinosum, a “boat”-shaped hypopygium enclosing the ovipositor, reaching far past the apex of the syntergum, the presence of a line of long setae along the entire costal cell of the hind wing, and a transverse line of thickened setae alongside the hyaline spur vein. Moreover, like most previously described Eocene Encyrtidae, the new taxon differs from the majority of the extant ones by a number of morphological features. The new fossil differs from most extant and all known fossil Encyrtidae by its unusually small, thin, smooth (without microsetae) mesotibial spur.

The earliest known Encyrtidae were described from middle Eocene Sakhalinian amber [7,12,14,15]. All of these are characterized by their cerci located at the gastral apex and possession of a long, thick, and setose mesotibial spur. A new fossil with an unusually small, bare (without microsetae) mesotibial spur and cerci advanced is described here.
The studied specimen is part of the unbiased PIN-964 Baltic amber collection of the Borissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (PIN). This material was collected in 1948 by A.G. Sharov directly in the amber processing factory in the Yantarnyi settlement, Kaliningrad Oblast [25].
The specimen was examined using the equipment and techniques described in Simutnik et al. [9]. Photographs were taken using a Leica Z16 APO stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC 450 camera and processed with LAS Core and Adobe Photoshop software (brightness and contrast only).
The terminology and abbreviations follow Sharkov [26], Gibson [27], and Heraty et al. [28]. We use the following abbreviations: F1, F2, etc. = funicular segments 1, 2, etc.; LOL = minimum distance between the anterior ocellus and a posterior ocellus; OOL = minimum distance between an eye margin and the adjacent posterior ocellus; OCL = minimum distance between a posterior ocellus and the occipital margin; POL = minimum distance between the posterior ocelli. Etymology. The name of the genus is a combination of the words "Baltic" and "calcar". The new genus is distinguished by an unusual mesotibial spur (Latin: calcar = spur). The genus name is a masculine noun.

Systematic Paleontology
Diagnosis. Female. Body compact, not flattened, with large, hypognathous head and large eyes; F1 shorter than broad; mandible, probably 2-dentate ( Figure 3A); filum spinosum absent; covering setae present; postmarginal vein longer than marginal vein; costal cell of hind wing with line of long setae, the longest of which is located alongside parastigma ( Figure 4B: ls); row of thickened setae present alongside hyaline spur vein of hind wing ( Figure 3C: ls; Figure 4B); mesotibia almost without extension to apex; mesotibial spur very small, thin, bare, slightly curved inwards; mesobasitarsus relatively short ( Figure 1B); cerci located in apical third of metasoma; hypopygium "boat"-shaped and enclosing the ovipositor, its apex reaching far past apex of last gastral tergum ( Figure 4D).
Male. Unknown. Remarks. Placement of the Balticalcarus archibaldi gen. et sp. nov. in Tetracneminae is supported by the absence of the filum spinosum of the linea calva, its bidentate mandibles, and the hypopygium reaching far past the apex of the syntergum. However, the connection of Mt8 and the outer plates of the ovipositor by the paratergites (the presence of which is one of the main features of Tetracneminae, see Trjapitzin [29]) are not distinctly visible in the type specimen. The structure labeled Mt8 and indicated by an arrow in Figure 4B might be the paratergite running anteriorly to the outside of the cercal plate.
Such a small mesotibial spur has never been recorded before in fossil encyrtids and is rare among extant ones (e.g., in Trjapitzinellus Viggiani, 1967; Platyrhopus Erdös, 1955 (Encyrtinae); and some genera of Miraini Ashmead, 1900 sensu Trjapitzin [29] (Tetracneminae)). However, the mesotibial spur of these extant genera is usually straight, thick, and densely covered with microsetae; the apex of the mesotibia is also considerably thickened and the basitarsus elongated.
The hind wing of the new genus has a single line of long setae along the entire costal cell ( Figure 4B: ls) as in most extant Tanaostigmatidae, extinct Leptoomus janzeni ( Figure 2E in [4]), and some extant genera of Bothriothoracini Howard, 1895 (Encyrtinae) [8,30]). The longest of these setae are located along the parastigma. In fossil Encyrtidae, the same line of long setae has been recorded in late Eocene Eocencnemus sugonjaevi Simutnik, 2002, Sulia glaesaria [8], and Electronoyesella [11], which do not belong to Encyrtinae. A line of long, but sparser and more or less equal in length setae along the costal cell of the hind wing is also present in the earliest known, middle Eocene encyrtids from Sakhalinian amber and the extant genus Ericydnus Walker, 1837 [11].
A transverse row of thickened setae alongside the spur vein of the hind wing ( Figure 3C: ls, Figure 4B: spv) has been also found in late Eocene Electronoyesella only [11]. It is absent in all known extant encyrtids, tanaostigmatids, late Eocene Leptoomus, and Eocencnemus, Sulia, as well as in all middle Eocene encyrtids from Sakhalinian amber.
Balticalcarus Coloration. Body black-brown; antenna unicolorous, dark brown; venation brown; mesotibial spur and tarsi pale yellowish-brown; surface of frontovertex, thorax (part), and legs appear shiny due to a thin layer of air, but without visible metallic shine.
Head. Lenticular, slightly wider than thorax in dorsal view ( Figure 2B,D and Figure 4D), broader and then long; occipital margin sharp, but not carinate, with row of short black setae ( Figure 3B); eyes bare, without visible setae (Figure 2A-D), inner orbits parallel; frontovertex slightly longer than broad, minimum distance between eyes about 0.37× head width; ocelli forming a slightly <90 • angle; anterior ocellus closer to upper margin of scrobal depression than to occipital margin; posterior ocelli elliptical in dorsal view, located closer to eye margin than to occipital margin; OOL about 0.5× ocellar diameter; OOL:POL:LOL:OCL about 1:10:7:3; eye reaching occipital margin ( Figure 2B); antennal scrobes as in Figure 3A,B, poorly visible, but meeting dorsally, not extended to anterior ocellus, in dorsal view anterior ocellus approximately three times closer to upper margin of scrobal depression than to occipital margin; interantennal prominence as in Figure 3A; antennal toruli located closer to mouth margin than to level of lower margin of eyes, separated from mouth margin by distance slightly less than their own width ( Figure 3A); malar space with complete malar sulcus, about 0.3× height of eye.
Antenna. Geniculate, with six funicular segments and three-segmented clava; radicle short, about 1.5× as long as broad ( Figure 3A); antennal scape including radicle~7× as long as broad, flattened, reticulate; pedicel conical, about as long as first two funicular segments combined, longer than any funicle segment; F1 slightly shorter than broad, F2 and F3 subquadrate, F4-F6 distinctly broader than long; width of flagellomeres slightly increases toward apex; at least F2-F6, and basal segment of clava with mps; clava as long as F3-F6 combined, without oblique truncation ( Figure 3A,B), flattened, much wider than F6; flagellum and clava clothed in short setae.
Wings. Fully developed, hyaline; linea calva closed ventrally, with well-developed line of long setae alongside its basal margin ( Figure 3C: cs); parastigma thickened ( Figure 4C), hyaline break (unpigmented area) present; marginal vein about 5× as long as broad; stigmal vein as long as marginal, with long uncus ( Figure 4C); postmarginal vein almost 2× as long as marginal vein, enlarged seta marking apex of postmarginal vein absent (as long as others on this vein); setae of marginal fringe short; hind wing with basal part of submarginal vein strongly swollen ( Figures 3B and 4C: smv).
Male. Unknown. Genus composition. Type species only.

Discussion
According to the modern molecular and intricate combined analyses of Munro et al. [31] and Cruad et al. [32] (and references therein), the evolutionary history of Encyrtidae began over 100 million years ago during the Cretaceous, when Chalcidoidea underwent

Discussion
According to the modern molecular and intricate combined analyses of Munro et al. [31] and Cruad et al. [32] (and references therein), the evolutionary history of Encyrtidae began over 100 million years ago during the Cretaceous, when Chalcidoidea underwent a rapid radiation. Along with several other families of "soft bodied" chalcidoids of the "Tiny Wasp clade", Encyrtidae diverged soon after. The first lineages to diverge (Mymaridae, Baeomorphidae (Rotoitidae), and "Tiny Wasp clade") were likely first oophagous and later associated mostly with hemipteran hosts [32].
According to all molecular analyses, both subfamilies of Encyrtidae (Encyrtinae and Tetracneminae) were in existence by the second half of the Cretaceous.
The earliest reliable morphological evidence for the existence of both extant encyrtid subfamilies were in the late Eocene [1,11]. The filum spinosum is the short and thickened setae on the apical margin of the linea calva that function as a part of the wing-coupling mechanism at the moment of jumping and takeoff. This is one of the main features of the extant Encyrtinae: Trjapitzin [41]. The filum spinosum was only reported since the late Eocene, not in middle Eocene Sakhalinian amber [12]. The oldest known encyrtine is a late Eocene fossil of the genus Glaesus Simutnik, 2014 in Baltic amber, and then several other genera with the filum spinosum were reported in Danish and Rovno ambers.
The presence of paratergites between the syntergum and the outer plates of the ovipositor is one of the main features of Tetracneminae [41]. We have only recently found this sclerotized, ribbon-like structure in a Rovno amber encyrtid wasp for the first time [11] (Figure 7). However, there are several taxa lacking the filum spinosum, and paratergites are unknown among them. Therefore, it would be premature to classify them as members of the Tetracneminae and their taxonomic placement within the family remains uncertain.
A reliable fossil of the extant genus is recorded in the Miocene [13]. The phylogenetic relationships of late Eocene encyrtids to extant genera and tribes remain unresolved. Most described Eocene Encyrtidae differ from the majority of extant ones by their long forewing veins including the marginal vein, a distinctly thickened, but not triangular parastigma, a seta marking the apex of the postmarginal vein is not any longer than others on this vein, and a very short radicle. They have poorly differentiated sculpture and are always fully winged, which are without distinct infusions, stripes, or patterns. Almost all retain the apical or subapical positions of their cerci. Cerci that are extremely advanced to the base of the metasoma, as in many extant members, are unknown in Eocene Encyrtidae.
Almost certainly Balticalcarus also possess paratergites (see Mt8 in Figure 4B) and belong to Tetracneminae. According to J.S. Noyes [30], the new taxon is probably very close to the common ancestor of the group of genera near the extant Clausenia Ishii, 1923, Mohelencyrtus Hoffer, 1969, and maybe the whole lineage that includes Charitopus Förster, 1856. Its "boat-shaped" hypopygium that encloses the ovipositor is very reminiscent of Charitopus, Lyka Mercet, 1921, etc., and the forewing venation is very similar to that of Clausenia and Moraviella Hoffer, 1954, and perhaps Mohelencyrtus. Its short mesotibial spur is also characteristic of this group. Apparently, all of these genera (including those of the tribe Miraini sensu Trjapitzin [29]) could be placed in the Tetracnemini Howard, 1892, because their ovipositor structures are so characteristic of the group [30]. However, the short antenna of Balticalcarus is not typical of this group and the mesotibial spur of all of these extant genera is usually straight, thick, and densely covered with microsetae. In any case, the discovery of this fossil is the next small step towards understanding the evolution of encyrtids.