Depression Mechanism of Strontium Ions in Bastnaesite Flotation with Salicylhydroxamic Acid as Collector

Metal ions are widely present in flotation pulp. Metal ions change solution chemistry and mineral surface properties, consequently affecting mineral flotation. In this work, the effect of strontium ions on bastnaesite flotation with salicylhydroxamic acid (SHA) was investigated by microflotation tests, contact angle measurements, zeta-potential measurements, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. Microflotation tests confirmed that the addition of strontium ions decreased bastnaesite floatability, compared with that in the absence of strontium ions. Contact angle measurements suggested that the pretreatment of strontium ions decreased SHA adsorption. Zeta potential measurements confirmed that the bastnaesite was depressed by the adsorption of positively charged strontium species, and the lower adsorption capacity of SHA onto the bastnaesite surfaces was obtained after modifying with strontium ions. XPS analysis demonstrated that strontium ions adsorbed onto the bastnaesite surfaces through the interaction between strontium ions and oxygen atoms of surface ≡ CeOH0 groups. This occurrence hindered surface Ce sites which chelated with SHA and therefore, decreased bastnaesite floatability.


Introduction
The special electron structure of rare earth elements (REE) leads to their unique fluorescent and chemical properties; therefore, REE play an irreplaceable role in many fields [1].As technology developed, the demand for rare earth elements has increased continuously in recent years, which requires higher recovery efficiency of rare earth ores.
Bastnaesite is the principal source of light rare earth elements, containing the cerium subgroup or lighter rare earth elements [2].Froth flotation is an effective method for separating bastnaesite from gangue minerals [1,3] and has received increasing attention in recent years.Hydroxamic acid is a widely used collector in bastnaesite flotation [4][5][6][7].Compared with fatty acid collectors, hydroxamic acid collectors have the advantage of better selectivity between bastnaesite and alkaline minerals [8], because the specificity of the hydroxamic acid functional group for rare earth cations is higher than alkaline earth cations [6,9].The adsorption of hydroxamic acid collectors on bastnaesite surfaces is attributed to chelation with surface REE [10].Rao studied the octyl hydroximic acid adsorption mechanism on bastnaesite surfaces with FT-IR and XPS measurements; the results showed that there may be only one kind of five-ring member chelate (-C=R-RE-O-N-) existing on the surfaces of bastnaesite [11].The adsorption mechanism of salicylhydroxamic acid (SHA) on bastnaesite surfaces was proved to be chemisorption, by Wang et al. [12].SHA interacts with active cationic sites on bastnaesite surfaces to form a stable five-ring member chelate.
In practical mineral flotation, the pulp contains various metal ions, which are usually referred to as "unavoidable ions".The metal ions inevitably change solution chemistry, mineral surface properties and therefore, affect mineral flotation.The metal ions come from multiple sources, such as mineral dissolution [13][14][15][16] and fluid inclusions [17][18][19].Bastnaesite and common gangue minerals, such as calcite, fluorite, barite and celestite, are typical semisoluble minerals [20], which are characterized by ionic bonding and limited solubility in water.In addition, metal salts may be used as modifying reagents [21].Feng et al. [22] investigated the activation mechanism of lead ions in cassiterite flotation with salicylhydroxamic acid as the collector; the results revealed that lead ions adsorbed onto the mineral surfaces through the interaction between lead species and oxygen sites of cassiterite surfaces to form Sn-O-Pb + .This phenomenon increased the number of active collector adsorption sites and hence, increased the floatability of cassiterite.Aluminium ions were used as depressants in the selective flotation of bastnaesite from monazite; the depressing effect of potassium alum appeared to be due to the preferential adsorption of hydrolyzed aluminum species on monazite, in comparison to bastnaesite [21].Ren J found that the depression of monazite is attributed to the preferential adsorption of Al 3+ on monazite surface PO 3−  4 sites [23].Deng et al. [24] reported that iron ions sharply decreased smithsonite flotation recovery even at a low concentration.The iron ions adsorbed to the mineral surfaces via both chemical and electrostatic interactions.The depression may be attributed to strong oxidation and hydrolysis.Despite these studies, there are still many knowledge limitations with respect to metal ion adsorption mechanism on bastnaesite surfaces and its implications on flotation.
Strontianite and celestite are primary stromtium minerals, and they are important gangue minerals in some rare earth mines.As semisoluble salt minerals, which are characterized by relatively high solubilities, the dissolution behaviors of these minerals have been widely investigated.The implication of strontianite dissolution in an aqueous environment was confirmed by a previous dissolution study [25,26].Celestite has been proven to be highly reactive at room temperature; dissolution of celestite plays an important role in determining the Sr composition in aqueous solution [27][28][29].Therefore, the dissolution of strontium ions into flotation pulp is inevitable.However, minimal information is available in the published literature in regard to the interaction mechanisms involving strontium ions, collectors and bastnaesite surfaces.
In flotation pulp, metal ions are usually adsorbed before the addition of collectors; therefore, it is necessary to consider change in surface potential, atomic compositions and collector adsorption in the presence of strontium ions.In the present work, the influence of strontium ions on bastnaesite flotation with SHA as the collector was exhibited using microflotation experiments, and its mechanism was investigated with contact angle measurements, zeta-potential measurements and XPS analysis.

Materials
The bastnaesite (CeCO 3 F) sample used in all the experiments was derived from Zaozhuang, China.The pure bastnaesite sample was enriched by repeated gravity separation and magnetic separation from grinding products of high grade raw ore.Finally, a bastnaesite sample with a purity above 95% was obtained.The ground products were sieved using a standard screen to achieve a −74 + 25 µm bastnaesite particle fraction.The rest of the sample was ground continuously until a −5 µm fraction was achieved for zeta-potential measurements.
Strontium chloride hexahydrate (SrCl 2 •6H 2 O) was supplied as the strontium ion source, and SHA was employed as the collector.Solution pH values were regulated using 0.1 mol/dm 3 hydrochloric acid and 0.1 mol/dm 3 sodium hydroxide stock solutions.All reagents employed in the present study were of analytical grade, and pure deionized water was used throughout testing.

Flotation Studies
Flotation experiments were conducted at room temperature in a small-scale flotation machine, and 2.0 g of pure bastnaesite samples were added into a 40 cm 3 flotation cell.The mineral suspension was first conditioned with SrCl 2 stock solution before SHA was added, as necessary.Subsequently, SHA was added and conditioned for 5 min before the pulp pH was regulated.After the collected products were filtered and dried, the weight distribution between the floated and unfloated bastnaesite particles was calculated to determine the corresponding recovery.

Contact Angle Studies
The contact angle measurements were conducted using a Drop Shape Analyser (DSA100, KRUSS, Hamburg, Germany) following the pendant droplet method.The samples (−38 µm) of untreated bastnaesite, bastnaesite treated with SHA and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions and SHA were prepared by following the same procedure as for single mineral flotation.

Zeta-Potential Determination
The zeta potential of the bastnaesite samples was determined using a ZetaPlus instrument (Brookhaven, New York, NY, USA).The mineral suspension (0.125% mass fraction) was dispersed and fully vibrated for a desired time by a constant temperature bath oscillator.This step was performed in the presence of desired reagent concentrations at a determined pH.After 30 min of the resultant suspension settling, the pH was measured and recorded, and the fine mineral particles were transferred to measure zeta potentials.

XPS Analysis
XPS were conducted for untreated bastnaesite and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions.The interaction products were examined via ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) with an Al K Alpha source.A survey scan of the analyzed sample was first conducted to detect elemental compositions, and then a precise scan was performed to obtain the XPS spectrum of a specific element.The C 1s spectrum at 284.8 eV was obtained and used as an internal standard to calibrate all of the measured spectra for charge compensation.

Effect of Strontium Ions on Bastnaesite Floatability
Microflotation tests of bastnaesite treated with SHA in the absence and presence of strontium ions at different pH were conducted, to examine the effect of strontium ions on the flotation behavior (Figure 1).As the pH increased, the recovery of bastnaesite increased gradually, reaching a maximum of 72.3% at approximately pH 8.0.The bastnaesite floatability dropped sharply at pH > 9.In an acidic environment, SHA was mainly present in the form of molecules, which limited SHA adsorption.The ionization of SHA incrementally increased with rising pH, leading to the increase of recovery at pH < 8; but in heavy alkaline solution, the competitive adsorption between SHA ions and hydroxyl ions decreased SHA adsorption.Therefore, under acidic and heavy alkaline conditions the bastnaesite obtained poor floatability.In the presence of strontium ions, the recovery decreased over the entire flotation pH range.At pH 8, the flotation recovery decreased to 45.4%; the gap between the two recovery curves was 26.9%, meaning a notable decrease in bastnaesite recovery.In contrast to the experiments in the absence of strontium ions, maximal recovery was obtained at pH 6.5; this may be attributed to surface modification due to the addition of strontium ions.The hydrophobicity of bastnaesite, bastnaesite treated with SHA, and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions and SHA at pH 8 was characterized by contact angle measurements.The results are shown in Figure 2. The contact angle of untreated bastnaesite was 25.5 ± 0.30°, as shown in Figure 2a, indicating a weak hydrophobicity.After being treated with SHA, the contact angle increased to 42.8 ± 0.14° (Figure 2b), meaning SHA could adsorb on bastnaesite surfaces, to increase hydrophobicity.The contact angle of bastnaesite treated with strontium ions and SHA was 38.6 ± 1.51°, as shown in Figure 2c, indicating that the addition of strontium ions decreased the adsorption of SHA on bastnaesite surfaces.The contact angle results show how strontium ions and SHA can change the surface hydrophobicity of bastnaesite surfaces; this is in agreement with the single mineral flotation results, which showed that strontium ions can depress the SHA flotation of bastnaesite.The depression may be attributed to the decrease of SHA adsorption on bastnaesite surfaces.As previously stated, SHA molecules adsorb on bastnaesite surfaces by chelating with surface REE (Ce) sites; after the addition of strontium ions, the number of active REE sites may be decreased and hence, the adsorption of SHA is also decreased.The hydrophobicity of bastnaesite, bastnaesite treated with SHA, and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions and SHA at pH 8 was characterized by contact angle measurements.The results are shown in Figure 2. The contact angle of untreated bastnaesite was 25.5 ± 0.30°, as shown in Figure 2a, indicating a weak hydrophobicity.After being treated with SHA, the contact angle increased to 42.8 ± 0.14° (Figure 2b), meaning SHA could adsorb on bastnaesite surfaces, to increase hydrophobicity.The contact angle of bastnaesite treated with strontium ions and SHA was 38.6 ± 1.51°, as shown in Figure 2c, indicating that the addition of strontium ions decreased the adsorption of SHA on bastnaesite surfaces.The contact angle results show how strontium ions and SHA can change the surface hydrophobicity of bastnaesite surfaces; this is in agreement with the single mineral flotation results, which showed that strontium ions can depress the SHA flotation of bastnaesite.The depression may be attributed to the decrease of SHA adsorption on bastnaesite surfaces.As previously stated, SHA molecules adsorb on bastnaesite surfaces by chelating with surface REE (Ce) sites; after the addition of strontium ions, the number of active REE sites may be decreased and hence, the adsorption of SHA is also decreased.The contact angle results show how strontium ions and SHA can change the surface hydrophobicity of bastnaesite surfaces; this is in agreement with the single mineral flotation results, which showed that strontium ions can depress the SHA flotation of bastnaesite.The depression may be attributed to the decrease of SHA adsorption on bastnaesite surfaces.As previously stated, SHA molecules adsorb on bastnaesite surfaces by chelating with surface REE (Ce) sites; after the addition of strontium ions, the number of active REE sites may be decreased and hence, the adsorption of SHA is also decreased.

Effect of Strontium Ions on Zeta Potential of Bastnaesite
Figure 3 shows the zeta potential of the bastnaesite treated and not treated with strontium ions, as a function of pH, in the absence and presence of SHA.As shown in Figure 3, the isoelectronic point Minerals 2018, 8, 66 5 of 12 (IEP) of the untreated bastnaesite was achieved at approximately pH 9. Hence, the bastnaesite surface was positively charged below pH 9 and negatively charged above pH 9.However, the point of zero charge (PZC) of bastnaesite, reported by Ren et al. [6,21] and Zhang [3], is 8.6; the difference may be due to the different bastnaesite samples used.There are two kinds of broken bonds present on the bastnaesite surfaces: ≡ F − Ce 2+ and ≡ CO 2− 3 [30][31][32].Due to surface protonation, these broken bonds convert into ≡ F − CeOH 0 and ≡ CO 3 H 0 groups in aqueous environment [33,34].For bastnaesite, H + , OH − and CO 2− 3 were found to determine the surface potential [35,36].Therefore, the zeta potential can be influenced primarily by pH.

Effect of Strontium Ions on Zeta Potential of Bastnaesite
Figure 3 shows the zeta potential of the bastnaesite treated and not treated with strontium ions, as a function of pH, in the absence and presence of SHA.As shown in Figure 3, the isoelectronic point (IEP) of the untreated bastnaesite was achieved at approximately pH 9. Hence, the bastnaesite surface was positively charged below pH 9 and negatively charged above pH 9.However, the point of zero charge (PZC) of bastnaesite, reported by Ren et al. [6,21] and Zhang [3], is 8.6; the difference may be due to the different bastnaesite samples used.There are two kinds of broken bonds present on the bastnaesite surfaces: ≡ F − Ce and ≡ CO [30][31][32].Due to surface protonation, these broken bonds convert into ≡ F − CeOH and ≡ CO H groups in aqueous environment [33,34].For bastnaesite, H , OH and CO were found to determine the surface potential [35,36].Therefore, the zeta potential can be influenced primarily by pH.After the mineral surface was treated with strontium ions, the zeta potential of bastnaesite shifted positively across the whole pH range, and the IEP increased from 9 to 9.5.This result indicates the adsorption of strontium ions on bastnaesite surfaces.The strontium ion species distribution in the solution as a function of pH was calculated, to reveal the interaction between strontium ions and bastnaesite surfaces.
Figure 4 plots the diagram of strontium ion species distribution as a function of pH based on solution chemistry calculation [37].It can be seen that across the entire pH range, only cationic strontium ion species are present.The hydrolysis of strontium ions in aqueous solution is quite weak; only monohydroxy complexes form at a high pH.At pH < 10.6, there are only free Sr ions in solution.The percentage of SrOH increases rapidly at pH > 12.
Figures 3 and 4 signify that the positively charged Sr adsorbed onto the mineral surface with a positive charge at pH below IEP; the adsorption cannot be attributed to electrostatic attraction.Therefore, the strontium ions may be adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces due to chemical interaction.At a pH above IEP, the positively charged Sr and SrOH may be adsorbed on negatively charged mineral surfaces due to both electrostatic and chemical interactions.
The influence of SHA on the zeta potential of bastnaesite surfaces in the absence and presence of strontium ion pretreatment is also demonstrated in Figure 3.It can be seen that after treating with SHA, the zeta potential decreased, and the IEP reduced, from 9 to 7.6.This is attributed to the chelating of anionic hydroxyl groups in SHA with REE sites of bastnaesite surfaces.As shown in Figure 3, the addition of strontium ions before SHA diminished the influence of SHA on zeta potential.The zeta potential of bastnaesite shifted less negatively relative to that in the absence of After the mineral surface was treated with strontium ions, the zeta potential of bastnaesite shifted positively across the whole pH range, and the IEP increased from 9 to 9.5.This result indicates the adsorption of strontium ions on bastnaesite surfaces.The strontium ion species distribution in the solution as a function of pH was calculated, to reveal the interaction between strontium ions and bastnaesite surfaces.
Figure 4 plots the diagram of strontium ion species distribution as a function of pH based on solution chemistry calculation [37].It can be seen that across the entire pH range, only cationic strontium ion species are present.The hydrolysis of strontium ions in aqueous solution is quite weak; only monohydroxy complexes form at a high pH.At pH < 10.6, there are only free Sr 2+ ions in solution.The percentage of SrOH + increases rapidly at pH > 12.
Figures 3 and 4 signify that the positively charged Sr 2+ adsorbed onto the mineral surface with a positive charge at pH below IEP; the adsorption cannot be attributed to electrostatic attraction.Therefore, the strontium ions may be adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces due to chemical interaction.At a pH above IEP, the positively charged Sr 2+ and SrOH + may be adsorbed on negatively charged mineral surfaces due to both electrostatic and chemical interactions.
The influence of SHA on the zeta potential of bastnaesite surfaces in the absence and presence of strontium ion pretreatment is also demonstrated in Figure 3.It can be seen that after treating with SHA, the zeta potential decreased, and the IEP reduced, from 9 to 7.6.This is attributed to the chelating of anionic hydroxyl groups in SHA with REE sites of bastnaesite surfaces.As shown in Figure 3, the addition of strontium ions before SHA diminished the influence of SHA on zeta potential.The zeta potential of bastnaesite shifted less negatively relative to that in the absence of strontium ions.Moreover, the IEP only reduced from 9 to 8.1.This may be attributed to the decrease in SHA adsorption when strontium ions are used, and is consistent with the microflotation and contact angle results.strontium ions.Moreover, the IEP only reduced from 9 to 8.1.This may be attributed to the decrease in SHA adsorption when strontium ions are used, and is consistent with the microflotation and contact angle results.

Adsorption Mechanism of Strontium Ions on Bastnaesite Surfaces
Based on the distinctive binding energies of the inner electrons of each element, XPS was used to identify both the chemical compositions and chemical states of the elements on sample surfaces.In this work, XPS was used to characterize the differences between untreated bastnaesite samples and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions.The resulting spectra were analyzed via peak fitting and separation, and the relative concentrations of various components were determined after using MultiPak Spectrum software to remove the portions of the spectra that represented contamination.
The XPS survey spectra of the original bastnaesite, the bastnaesite treated with strontium ions within a binding energy of 1000-0eV, are shown in Figure 5.It can be seen that in both Figure 5a,b, a Sr signal could not be detected, this may be due to the low adsorption capacity of strontium ions on bastnaesite surfaces.As shown in Figure 6, in the high-resolution XPS spectra for the original bastnaesite, Sr spectra also cannot be detected, suggesting high purity of the bastnaesite samples.However, on the bastnaesite surfaces treated with strontium ions (Figure 6), an Sr 3d peak, positioned at 134.6eV, appeared, indicating the adsorption of strontium ions.Metal ions have been proven to be adsorbed on some carbonate minerals, by complexing with surface CO [24,38], while the binding energy of Sr 3d in SrCO3 is 133.2 eV [39], apparently different from that of adsorbed Sr in this work, indicating the strontium ions may not adsorb by complexing with surface CO of bastnaesite surfaces to form SrCO3.
As shown in Figure 7a, the peak positioned at 684.65 eV is ascribed to F 1s of bastnaesite surfaces [40].After treatment with strontium ions, the binding energy of F 1s was still 684.65 eV, as shown in Figure 7b, implying that the chemical surroundings of F have not changed.This suggests that the surface F atom was not involved into the chemical adsorption reaction; therefore, it can be deduced that the surface F atom may not be the chemical adsorption site for strontium ions.

Adsorption Mechanism of Strontium Ions on Bastnaesite Surfaces
Based on the distinctive binding energies of the inner electrons of each element, XPS was used to identify both the chemical compositions and chemical states of the elements on sample surfaces.In this work, XPS was used to characterize the differences between untreated bastnaesite samples and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions.The resulting spectra were analyzed via peak fitting and separation, and the relative concentrations of various components were determined after using MultiPak Spectrum software to remove the portions of the spectra that represented contamination.
The XPS survey spectra of the original bastnaesite, the bastnaesite treated with strontium ions within a binding energy of 1000.0 eV, are shown in Figure 5.It can be seen that in both Figure 5a,b, a Sr signal could not be detected, this may be due to the low adsorption capacity of strontium ions on bastnaesite surfaces.As shown in Figure 6, in the high-resolution XPS spectra for the original bastnaesite, Sr spectra also cannot be detected, suggesting high purity of the bastnaesite samples.However, on the bastnaesite surfaces treated with strontium ions (Figure 6), an Sr 3d peak, positioned at 134.6 eV, appeared, indicating the adsorption of strontium ions.Metal ions have been proven to be adsorbed on some carbonate minerals, by complexing with surface CO 2− 3 [24,38], while the binding energy of Sr 3d in SrCO 3 is 133.2 eV [39], apparently different from that of adsorbed Sr in this work, indicating the strontium ions may not adsorb by complexing with surface CO 2− 3 of bastnaesite surfaces to form SrCO 3 .
As shown in Figure 7a, the peak positioned at 684.65 eV is ascribed to F 1s of bastnaesite surfaces [40].After treatment with strontium ions, the binding energy of F 1s was still 684.65 eV, as shown in Figure 7b, implying that the chemical surroundings of F have not changed.This suggests that the surface F atom was not involved into the chemical adsorption reaction; therefore, it can be deduced that the surface F atom may not be the chemical adsorption site for strontium ions.The C 1s spectrum in Figure 8a exhibited two well-separated peaks at 284.8 eV and 289.6 eV.The components at 284.8 eV were assigned to carbon contamination, while the peak at 289.6 eV was assigned to the C of CO 2− 3 in bastnaesite [40,41].As shown in Figure 8b, after strontium ion adsorption, the binding energy of C 1s in CO 2− 3 was 289.65 eV; this indicates that the chemical surroundings of the C atom in the carbonate group had changed.The C 1s spectrum in Figure 8a exhibited two well-separated peaks at 284.8 eV and 289.6 eV.The components at 284.8 eV were assigned to carbon contamination, while the peak at 289.6 eV was assigned to the C of CO in bastnaesite [40,41].As shown in Figure 8b, after strontium ion adsorption, the binding energy of C 1s in CO was 289.65 eV; this indicates that the chemical surroundings of the C atom in the carbonate group had not changed.As shown in Figure 9a, the O 1s spectrum of the original bastnaesite could be fitted reasonably, with two peaks at 531.57eV and 532.3 eV.The O 1s peak positioned at 531.57eV was attributed to the oxygen in carbonate group of bastnaesite [41], and the other peak positioned at 532.3 eV was related to the oxygen in hydroxyl species (≡ CeOH ) [22,40,42].After the bastnaesite surface was modified by strontium ions, the binding energy of O 1s in the carbonate group barely shifted (Figure 9b), meaning that the chemical surroundings of the O atom in CO of bastnaesite have not changed.Combining the C 1s and Sr 3d binding energy analyses, it can be concluded that the = CO H on bastnaesite surfaces is not the adsorption site for strontium ions.
The surface atomic concentrations of Ce, C, O, F and Sr, determined via XPS, are summarized in Table 1.On the surfaces of untreated bastnaesite, the atomic concentrations of Ce, C, O and F were 6.05%, 19.73%, 59.66% and 14.55%, respectively.After strontium ion adsorption, a Sr 3d signal was detected with a concentration of 0.55%.Compared to the original bastnaesite, the atomic concentration of C in CO decreased dramatically, from 19.73% to 7.97%; this may be attributed to surface CO dissolution by complexing with Sr in solution to form SrCO (aq).The decrease in C atomic concentration contributed to the increase in Ce, O and F atomic concentrations.Overall, after strontium ion adsorption, the elemental and composition of bastnaesite surfaces were changed and a new Sr species formed.As shown in Figure 9, the binding energy of O 1s in the hydroxyl species shifted by −0.42 eV after being treated with strontium ions, meaning that strontium ions may be adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces by interacting with O atoms from surface ≡ CeOH groups.As shown in Figure 9a, the O 1s spectrum of the original bastnaesite could be fitted reasonably, with two peaks at 531.57eV and 532.3 eV.The O 1s peak positioned at 531.57eV was attributed to the oxygen in carbonate group of bastnaesite [41], and the other peak positioned at 532.3 eV was related to the oxygen in hydroxyl species (≡ CeOH 0 ) [22,40,42].After the bastnaesite surface was modified by strontium ions, the binding energy of O 1s in the carbonate group barely shifted (Figure 9b), meaning that the chemical surroundings of the O atom in CO 2− 3 of bastnaesite have not changed.Combining the C 1s and Sr 3d binding energy analyses, it can be concluded that the = CO 3 H 0 on bastnaesite surfaces is not the adsorption site for strontium ions.
The surface atomic concentrations of Ce, C, O, F and Sr, determined via XPS, are summarized in Table 1.On the surfaces of untreated bastnaesite, the atomic concentrations of Ce, C, O and F were 6.05%, 19.73%, 59.66% and 14.55%, respectively.After strontium ion adsorption, a Sr 3d signal was detected with a concentration of 0.55%.Compared to the original bastnaesite, the atomic concentration of C in CO 2− 3 decreased dramatically, from 19.73% to 7.97%; this may be attributed to surface CO  As shown in Figure 9, the binding energy of O 1s in the hydroxyl species shifted by −0.42 eV after being treated with strontium ions, meaning that strontium ions may be adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces by interacting with O atoms from surface ≡ CeOH 0 groups.Figure 10a shows the high-resolution XPS spectra of Ce 3d for untreated bastnaesite and treated with strontium ions.The Ce 3d of untreated bastnaesite was fitted with a double structure with a binding energy of 904.45 eV for the Ce 3d3/2 level and a binding energy of 885.85 eV for the Ce 3d5/2 level [41,43,44].As shown in Figure 10a,b, after treatment with strontium ions, the binding energy of Ce 3d3/2 shifted significantly by −0.9 eV and the binding energy of Ce 3d5/2 shifted by −0.35 eV.This result indicates that the chemical surroundings of the Ce atom on bastnaesite surfaces have changed.Combined with the O 1s binding energy analysis of surface hydroxyl species, it can be concluded that strontium ions adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces by complexing with oxygen atoms of surface ≡ CeOH .

Conclusions
The present work examined the effect of strontium ions on bastnaesite flotation with SHA as the collector.The interaction of strontium ions and SHA with the bastnaesite surfaces was studied by microflotation tests and surface analyses to understand the underlying mechanisms.Given the aforementioned results, the following primary conclusions can be drawn.Figure 10a shows the high-resolution XPS spectra of Ce 3d for untreated bastnaesite and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions.The Ce 3d of untreated bastnaesite was fitted with a double structure with a binding energy of 904.45 eV for the Ce 3d3/2 level and a binding energy of 885.85 eV for the Ce 3d5/2 level [41,43,44].As shown in Figure 10a,b, after treatment with strontium ions, the binding energy of Ce 3d3/2 shifted significantly by −0.9 eV and the binding energy of Ce 3d5/2 shifted by −0.35 eV.This result indicates that the chemical surroundings of the Ce atom on bastnaesite surfaces have changed.Combined with the O 1s binding energy analysis of surface hydroxyl species, it can be concluded that strontium ions adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces by complexing with oxygen atoms of surface ≡ CeOH .

Conclusions
The present work examined the effect of strontium ions on bastnaesite flotation with SHA as the collector.The interaction of strontium ions and SHA with the bastnaesite surfaces was studied by microflotation tests and surface analyses to understand the underlying mechanisms.Given the aforementioned results, the following primary conclusions can be drawn.

Conclusions
The present work examined the effect of strontium ions on bastnaesite flotation with SHA as the collector.The interaction of strontium ions and SHA with the bastnaesite surfaces was studied by microflotation tests and surface analyses to understand the underlying mechanisms.Given the aforementioned results, the following primary conclusions can be drawn.
The floatability of bastnaesite was decreased by the pretreatment of strontium ions with SHA as the collector, and the recovery of bastnaesite decreased from 72.30% to 45.44% at pH 8. Simultaneous contact angles and zeta potential measurements on the bastnaesite surfaces demonstrated that the adsorption of strontium ions decreased SHA adsorption.
The depression mechanism of strontium ions in the bastnaesite flotation might be attributed to the interaction of the strontium species in solution with oxygen atoms from surface ≡ CeOH 0 to form the surface complex, Ce-O-Sr + .This phenomenon may have hindered the chelation of SHA with surface Ce sites, as shown in Figure 11.The floatability of bastnaesite was decreased by the pretreatment of strontium ions with SHA as the collector, and the recovery of bastnaesite decreased from 72.30% to 45.44% at pH 8. Simultaneous contact angles and zeta potential measurements on the bastnaesite surfaces demonstrated that the adsorption of strontium ions decreased SHA adsorption.
The depression mechanism of strontium ions in the bastnaesite flotation might be attributed to the interaction of the strontium species in solution with oxygen atoms from surface ≡ CeOH to form the surface complex, Ce-O-Sr + .This phenomenon may have hindered the chelation of SHA with surface Ce sites, as shown in Figure 11.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Zeta potential of bastnaesite treated and not treated with strontium ions as a function of pH in the absence and presence of SHA.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Zeta potential of bastnaesite treated and not treated with strontium ions as a function of pH in the absence and presence of SHA.

2 − 3 dissolution
by complexing with Sr 2+ in solution to form SrCO 3 (aq).The decrease in C atomic concentration contributed to the increase in Ce, O and F atomic concentrations.Overall, after strontium ion adsorption, the elemental and composition of bastnaesite surfaces were changed and a new Sr species formed.

Figure 12 Figure 9 .
Figure10ashows the high-resolution XPS spectra of Ce 3d for untreated bastnaesite and bastnaesite treated with strontium ions.The Ce 3d of untreated bastnaesite was fitted with a double structure with a binding energy of 904.45 eV for the Ce 3d3/2 level and a binding energy of 885.85 eV for the Ce 3d5/2 level[41,43,44].As shown in Figure10a,b, after treatment with strontium ions, the binding energy of Ce 3d3/2 shifted significantly by −0.9 eV and the binding energy of Ce 3d5/2 shifted by −0.35 eV.This result indicates that the chemical surroundings of the Ce atom on bastnaesite surfaces have changed.Combined with the O 1s binding energy analysis of surface hydroxyl species, it can be concluded that strontium ions adsorbed on bastnaesite surfaces by complexing with oxygen atoms of surface ≡ CeOH 0 .

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Schematic representation of depression mechanism of strontium ions in bastnaesite flotation with SHA as collector.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Schematic representation of depression mechanism of strontium ions in bastnaesite flotation with SHA as collector.

Table 1 .
Atomic concentrations of bastnaesite samples before and after strontium ion treatment.

Table 1 .
Atomic concentrations of bastnaesite samples before and after strontium ion treatment.